You can set your watch to it. In the wake of very jihad terror attack, no matter how heinous and horrifying, in come the washerwomen with buckets of dirty water working double time to scrub and censor the motive from the attack. Once the stage is sufficiently washed and prepped, in march the jihadis in the information battle-space, silver-tongued snakes selling Islam-is-peace snake oil to an over-eager media audience braying for more.
CNN stages a fake Muslim protest (watch):
WATCH. @CNN scripting a narrative. Right before your eyes. pic.twitter.com/rdRbQzbqgy
— Katie Hopkins (@KTHopkins) June 4, 2017
CNN had to stage it. Because there are never any Muslim protests against jihad or female genital mutilation or gender apartheid or creed apartheid or Islamic antisemitism. I have yet to see CNN, BBC or any of the enemedia news outlets go to the hospitals and interview the victims or speak to the mutilated, maimed, deformed little girls with holes in their faces who attended the Manchester pop concert.
No matter the monstrosity, nothing changes. If the torn, dismembered bodies of little girls at an Ariana Grande concert were not a game-changer, then nothing will move the conquered and the unmovable. Not only do we, the victims, have to clean up the flesh and bone and blood running down the pavement, we must subject ourselves to endless dawah (proselytizing) for Islam on mind-numbing news shows on the BBC, CNN, MSNBC, and the like. FOX is lost. Sunday morning, Fox and Friends had on liar and deceiver Mubin Shaikh (Robert Spencer debated him here), Shaikh said “we must never equate Islam and terrorism.” The hosts nodded gravely. There is nowhere on TV you can get reality.
Teddy bears, candlelight vigils and hashtags will not defeat jihad.
Islamic terror-tied groups like CAIR rub their hooves in glee in the wake of every Islamic attack. After the body count, it’s their turn to wage jihad in the information battle-space.
One of the jihadis said, “I’m ready to do whatever I need to do in the name of Allah. I am ready in the name of Allah to do what needs to be done, including killing my own mother.”
What further proof does anyone need? Why the madness and irrational denial? Sixteen years after 9/11 and over thirty thousand deadly Islamic attacks, this is where we are? Yes, deliberate delusion and collusion continues. As I have so often lamented, in the wake of horrific jihad terror comes the post-jihad dawah (proselytizing for Islam). While jihadis scream “Allahu akbar” and “takbir,” elites in the media and academia assure us it is not about Allah or Islam.
As for the Muslims laughing and shouting “Allahu akbar!” in the wake of the attacks, you won’t ever read about that in the enemedia.
Nor will you hear much about these scenes from the London jihad slaughter (as reported in the Guardian):
–“He just stepped outside the bar for a second and a man ran up to him and said: ‘This is for my family, this is for Islam’, and stuck a knife straight in him. He’s got a seven-inch scar going from his belly round to his back,” Elizabeth O’Neill told reporters outside King’s College hospital.
–The van was “probably travelling at about 50 miles an hour” and hit “five or six people.”
–According to another witness, Eric, the men inside jumped out once the van crashed and “ran towards the people that they nearly ran over”. “[Then] they literally just started kicking them, punching them, they took out knives… it was a rampage really,” he said.
One man, Gerard, told the BBC he saw a woman being stabbed “10 or 15 times” by men shouting “This is for Allah.”
Nor will you hear much about the words spoken to a mother in London before a jihadi plunged a knife into her son’s stomach: “This is for Islam.”
Will we ever learn their motive?
One of the other jihadis who attacked London with two coreligionists before being shot dead by police deceived his neighbors into thinking he was a great guy, a good neighbor. He played football with their children on the nearby field. Secretly, he had a devout, destructive hatred, and he frequently changed his appearance in preparation of unleashing a deadly Islamic attack on the capital city, during which seven people died and up to 50 were injured last night. How many other “moderates” are in our midst? More than you can imagine.
Prime Minister Theresa May and every major media news outlet insists jihadis have “perverted” and/or “hijacked” Islam? How have they perverted it? They cite Quranic texts and teachings chapter and verse. They follow the hadith, Muhammad’s example.
Harun Khan, who leads the Muslim Council of Britain, said, “I am appalled and angered by the terrorist attacks at London Bridge and borough market, in my home city. These acts of violence were truly shocking and I condemn them in the strongest terms.” Is that so. What have Khan and his coreligionists who allege that this is a misunderstanding of Islam done to combat it? There is, for example, not a single program in any mosque or Islamic school in the UK (or the UK) to teach young Muslims to reject the Islamic State’s understanding of Islam. With the Islamic State energetically recruiting young Muslims in the US, that is a significant omission.
The Sun says that Ramadan is meant for devotion and peace. Since when? As Robert Spencer has noted: “A jihad group explained it back in 2012: ‘The month of Ramadan is a month of holy war and death for Allah. It is a month for fighting the enemies of Allah and God’s messenger, the Jews and their American facilitators.’ Referring to a jihad attack that happened at that time, the message continued: ‘One of our groups aided by Allah managed to bomb a bus full of Jewish tourists, plunderers of holy lands, after careful tracking. The holy war is not confined to a particular arena and we shall fight the Jews and the Americans until they leave the land of Islam.’”
All this dawah and whitewashing makes one thing clear. Terrorism works. In the wake of every jihad attack come sharia-backed policies, legislation, and submission. Freedom of speech is not the problem. Free exchange of ideas is not the problem. Islamic texts and teachings that exhort to jihad is the problem.
Yet Theresa May says the internet must now be regulated following the London Bridge terror attack. Of course, good folks will say, well, that makes sense, because they don’t know better. But let me assure you, these measures will be used to silence my colleagues and me. The left has already proved to be too fearful of Islam to take real action against jihadis. And if my colleagues and I were not blacklisted and invited to debate these ideas in the national conversation, good people would see this for exactly what it is.
The West means to roll back technology, silence the mechanism, in which those religious teachings are shared? That is a primitive as jihad savagery.
As long as Quranic texts and teachings are seen as legitimate and holy, Muslims will share them, preach them, and act on them with or without the internet. What is May going to do, ban WhatsApp and Telegram, the dark web? She banned my colleagues and me, not jihad preachers or these Muslim terrorists who slaughtered Brits in the homeland. She equates those of us who oppose jihad (extremists) to the jihadis (extremists). If Theresa May were serious, she would lift the ban on Robert Spencer and me.
Like every bad left-wing idea, this steaming pile of dung is packaged in a blue Tiffany box. Remember how they sold “hate crime” “legislation” using the brutal beating of a gay man, Matthew Shepard (when actually it was just a drug deal gone bad). Hate crime legislation was officially criminalizing thought. Thought crime.
The internet is the last place for informed citizens to get news and information the sharia-compliant elite media won’t cover. Online is the last frontier for truth and free speech, and the left is going after that as well, enforcing the blasphemy laws under the sharia. Facebook has blocked my content from close one million followers.
If Theresa May wants to turn things around, the first thing she can do is lift the ban on Spencer and me — if for no other reason than to show that she finally understands that the problem is not those who oppose jihad, but jihad.
Instead, the dawah and whitewashing will continue.
Pamela Geller is the President of the American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI), publisher of the Geller Report and author of The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration’s War on America and Stop the Islamization of America: A Practical Guide to the Resistance. Follow her on Twitter here. Like her on Facebook here.
Pal says
“He has always been pleasant to our family”
“How it could have been him”
Those pleasant radicals…
http://news.sky.com/story/london-bridge-victims-stabbed-in-the-throat-by-attackers-10904176
Adrian says
Of course all the media “reports” are scripted…
But also, following Joe Biden’s meeting with Hollywood filmmakers, don’t hold your breathe for any honest films about terrorists or Islam…. quite the contrary, I am sure – just more high tech apologia from the Hollywood “washerwomen”
Adrian says
sorry, I meant John Kerry’s meeting:
http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/envelope/cotown/la-et-ct-john-kerry-hollywood-isis-20160216-story.html
Rick Spencer says
Caught in the act of making more FAKE news!
WPM says
You are right they do not get it as seen in the last few elections in Europe . The leaders first order of business should be protecting normal people going about there normal lives. This appeasement did not work with Hitler about 85 years ago in Europe and it will not work now. P.M. May has dug a big deep hole the British have a choice on 6/8/2017 to elect someone else going into a different direction then May or climb into the hole and let the Islamics bury you alive. May will not lift the ban she will push threw more laws on what you can say on the internet in England ,the truth hurts her keeps her from digging the hole.
Tom says
God please let it NOT be the ultra left wing labour party. Talk about appeasers, those guys will welcome millions more and make sure that they are given full social and medical benefits before the actual Brits. Corben is a communist in disguise.
fcs says
Very true article. The evil is Islam itself not some mythical radicalization of it. ISIS, in truth, is the true face of Islam because they are only following the commands of the Koran and Mohammad.
John A. Marre says
Pamela and Robert. I agree fully with what you are saying. You are absolutely right.
utis says
ISIS takes credit for it. Let Trump bomb the crap out of the caliphate and see if the “moderates” protest . Then throw them out of the country.
Andre Paul says
Unfortunately, you are right. Those Mohamed followers are the cancer of our society.
Tom says
People should just say “Nope !!! Not gonna stand for it any more. If muslims won’t get their radicals outed to the authorities then too bad so sad if your community gets blamed.” ENOUGH of the VICTIM bull***t. They have cried wolf once too often.
thomas says
Do you know how much these actors were paid?
WPM says
They paid them with cheap beer and ham sandwiches.
berserker says
Not only are Westerners parasitized by political correctness but they are also over-civilized. By that I mean it is simply not possible for them to put themselves in the minds of the savages. They cannot comprehend something like “killing one’s mother because of religious conviction” ; there is a failure of imagination.
Tom says
It is a failure of education.
Teachers and professors are the tools of the left and sculpt the minds of our young into a distorted sociopathic mentality that cannot handle facts and can only deal with feelings and empathies.
The world of many of our young people is upside down, illogical and emotion driven.
It is going to take one huge shake of their collective heafs to bring them down to reality. When that happens, probably in the form of a mass killing by Islamists on a scale not yet seen, they will be in such shock and denial as to be considered walking dead for all useful purposes.
Carolyne says
It is neither the failure of education or imagination. It is simply the faithful following the dictates of Mohammed and the Koran. It is pure Islam in its original form which, according to the tenets, can never be changed.
Michelle Ricciardone says
These real news articles are great . The truth is refreshing, no matter how disturbing it is! I applaud Gihad Watch and try and share what I learn here! No where do you get straight talk like this ! Keep it up GW. And everyone should try and share the news ! !
Steve Klein says
I watched Fox News contributor Katie Pavlich debating Mary Anne Marsh (America Newsroom) on President Trump’s proposed travel ban. Katie Pavlich (like most conservatives) is saying the ban has NOTHING to do with Islam; or religion. Is this a smart strategy? Of course we know it has EVERYTHING to do with religion / ideology. Why the duplicity? She said there are Christian refugees who will be affected by the travel ban. Christians should not be affected by the ban, should they?
JayT says
Why the duplicity? Because any mention of a travel ban specifically aimed at Muslims will invite the courts to deny it based on discrimination. I’m not a lawyer, but doesn’t that just beg the next question of why would U.S. Constitutional rights such as discriminating based on religion apply to those who aren’t citizens and aren’t in U.S. territory? Just plain weird. Does person A living in Timbuktu have all constitutional rights afforded American citizens? So person A can tell their gov’t they can own a firearm under the 2nd amendment regardless if their own gov’t outlaws owning a firearm? How much fun it is to sink into a quagmire of chaotic logic.
The real question that should be asked is how effective is such a travel ban? Was it not mentioned this would be for six countries and the ban is for 120 days or so? So a dedicated Jihadist wouldn’t be able to stay on a waiting and vetting list for more than 120 days?
You know, Trump, if you’re going to go for the win then don’t do a Homer Simpson (“You don’t call out sick from work, just show up and do a half-ass job), state the ban is permanent and when those six countries whine and complain, you tell them after you clean house – if you can – and no more Jihadists are coming to the U.S. from your countries, then the ban can be revisited.
As for Christian refugees, why bother worrying about how a travel ban would affect them? If George (dimwit tool of CAIR) Bush can simply deposit tens of thousands of Muslim Somalis in Minnesota without any sort of a process, and Obama (never met an American-Christian tradition he didn’t despise) can import Muslims willy-nilly into the U.S., then Trump can simply scoop up groups of willing Christians and deposit them into the U.S. as well (assuming any significant numbers are left alive in the Middle East).
AnneM says
Better to have those Christians that are left be allowed to come in and that be it.
StacyGirl says
The logic employed by the Trump Admn was following the precedent set by the former president: travelers from countries having no stable governing offices to produce proper passports, records, etc would temporarily be banned from entering. Now SCOTUS will decide. It would affect Christians, sadly, but once a ban is in place it could be expanded, and in the case of Christians, exceptions. Fake passports and identities are already being used but imagine all the new “converts” we’d see! Churches in the ME are excellent archives but most have been destroyed by the Muslims. Islam is responsible for the longest offensive against humanity, yes?
common sense says
9-11 cracked the shell followed by jihad attacks and setting up jihadi cells while the MSM Gestapo and Muslim advocacy groups twist a narrative that actually will embrace more attacks and infiltration. JIHAD attacks that have increased in frequency, tempo and severity since Hedbo and Paris. Just after the Iran nuke deal went through and Hussein’s illegal funding of extremist groups with hard cash and pulling back our own security forces off point and opening our borders to any and all. “Come getchya some it’s your nation now even if your not a citizen, spread that American wealth around even if you earned none of that wealth, embrace perversity”. Of course remeber MSM, Hollywood and the brain washed left have their algorithms of hate in full swing saying we are the bigots for speaking truth based on simple to understand, provable, empirical data and evidence. All on Cameron, Hollande, May, Merkel, MSM, the DC lobbyist cronies that won’t end the war and Obama
“Despite the constant negative press covfefe.” = “IN THE END WE WIN”.
common sense says
S/be- “Hebdo”
Malcolm (South Afric) says
Here is CNN staging the above narrative. Damn what fake News.
Carolyne says
I saw that last night on FOX. The CNN people were even giving them chalk marks on which to stand and orchestrated when the shouting and moving would begin.
cathyleeman@yahoo.com says
The comments from Mayor Khan of London are not based on facts, he is claims that that the coward attackers were disgusting and vile , and does not represent Islam, his religion. Apparently he does not know his Quran that have command to slay for Allah.
But he is following the command to protect the doctrine from being exposed as the root of Islam terror by denial of doctrine, so out come the veiled woman to bring flowers, sorrowful faces and appear peaceful to confuse the target groups and not appear as the enemy. There is no radical form of Islam …Islam is Islam and calls for jihad,.that is violent and taught in the mosques.
This article explains it, the curtain is rising…Islam I think should be redefined…as now it is hiding under the term religion that hides it is not peaceful.
Steve Klein says
This MEMRI piece looks to be worth reading:
‘….Contrary to the approach of the Western leaders, who blame the evil character of the perpetrators while absolving the faith they follow, the truth is that these perpetrators, by the standards of their own belief, are virtuous people who follow the directives of the Koran [48:29]: “Be fierce towards the infidels, merciful towards each other.” The problem lies not in the perpetrators’ innate character but in some of the core values of their religious belief system. Indeed, their faith – any faith – includes elements that are beautiful alongside elements that are malevolent. Denying that these malevolent elements are part of the faith, as the Western leaders do, is wrong. It is such denial that is unhelpful; in fact, it is self-deception….
https://www.memri.org/reports/they-are-neither-losers-nihilists-worshipers-death-nor-sick-cowards%E2%80%93-rather-believers-and
They Are Neither ‘Losers,’ ‘Nihilists,’ ‘Worshipers Of Death,’ Nor ‘Sick Cowards’– But Rather Believers And Idealists Who Commit Horrific Murders For A Cause And Sacrifice Their Lives For A Utopian Future: A World Ruled By Their Faith
By: Yigal Carmon
underbed cat says
please remove email
underbed cat says
Please remove my post .
underbed cat says
Please remove my comment
Ace-of-Clubs says
Pam is right about the media telling us little or nothing about how the victims of the Manchester attack are recovering, I for one would like to know if they are all making good recoveries, at least physically. There is an obsession with Islam not being the enemy, when we all know it is. 9/11 should have been the turning point. Over 3000 people from dozens of countries murdered by Muslim terrorists, much of it witnessed all around the world on TV. That should have been a big wake-up call.
Tom was right earlier on in the comments when he speaks of a useless, ill-educated younger generation in Britain, most of them brainwashed by their left-wing teachers who have trained at the left-wing teacher training colleges which have been left of centre for decades. I doubt they are taught anything positive about Britain and its history, and few get a chance to go back further than WW2.
It is almost impossible to debate Islam in the UK now online or in public. Thank God for JW, where we can still express our views and not hold back. It is good to know that there are others out there with the same views. But most Europeans are sleep walking towards disaster, too wrapped up in their own lives, the appalling dire popular culture, rampant consumerism. The march of Islam has happened just at the time when Christianity has lost its hold in Europe. Even the Pope seems reluctant to defend Christian values.
Europe is doomed I fear. The Muslim population in the UK doubled between 2001 and 2011, so it’s a question of “do the maths” in the end.
A Lee says
Is it possible that these are Amahdi Muslims? All the same, the obviously staged filming is contrived.The CNN reporters are clearly telling the people where to stand. Another website pointed out that all of the white police officers left the scene while the non-white officers posed with this tiny group. We don’t know who made the signs that they’re holding. If these women and children are indeed Amahdi Muslims, CNN has put them in danger by doing this. With Clinton News Network, of course, it’s always about the narrative.
Guest says
Pamella Geller I salute you
underbed cat says
I agree with you ace of clubs….but as we know the experts who were not connected to mosques or Islam had all this information about the Quran, Mohammed’s life, and sharia law… after 9/11, which should have been enough to restrict the influence but that was considered “racist”, there was a complete ignorance about it as the organizations and mosques that had grown across the country before and after 9/11. Authorities had little interest in the facts and turned to the enemy to explain,advise and construct the narrative. The two parties still fighting over power, pursued favor and the wrong solution to a problem they could not even see. Which can only be a insurgency to establish influence and control of a country by sharia. And they still are trying as they buy influence of media and shame and silence. Trump opened the subject and now they scramble to learn and discredit.
Matthieu Baudin says
“…Yet Theresa May says the internet must now be regulated following the London Bridge terror attack. Of course, good folks will say, well, that makes sense, because they don’t know better. But let me assure you, these measures will be used to silence my colleagues and me…”
Macron and May will probably lead the way in internet censorship attempting to ‘put a lid on it’ by blocking both Violent Jihad Sites and also Independent Anti Jihad Forums. This will have the appearance to the gullible of even-handedness in line with the theme of moral equivalence. The main reason that these leaders find themselves choosing this particular policy direction is that they won’t countenance the incarceration or deportation of known militant sympathisers or enact temporary immigration bans. So this is what is likely on the way from these twins on either side of the Channel – a two pronged policy against ‘violent extremism’ consisting of increased dependence upon the security and law enforcement personnel to ‘put out fires’ together with broad ranging internet censorship. Law abiding citizens across Western Europe will need to stand up for themselves in what promises to be a very difficult struggle. Fortunately we have a solid and vocal community of voices from Central Europe to count on and of course that great pillar of freedom, the people of the United States.
AnneM says
Any efforts will fail to censor the internet thanks to one person: President Donald J. Trump. He is NOW the leader of the free world and of the west. Rather he would be for taking the fight to the ISLAMOfacists.
FYI says
Cue the placard bearing muslims trying to say this is simply the work of ISIS.
Actually,ISIS are faithful to the koran.They are simply emulating their mass murdering “prophet” muhammed.
It is mainstream islam behind this terror.
It is allah himself who sanctions “the slaying of the unbelievers”k2:191.
It is the koran that sanctions the mass murder of the “unbelievers”.
Valkyrie Ziege says
; Sorry, folks, the reality is that Matthew Shepard was murdered because he, very unwisely, flashed cash money in front of meth addicts. Question – What was he doing being buddies with meth addicts to begin with? Answer – because It’s a known fact that male homosexuals use meth in epidemic proportions. Another good question is Muhammadans murder homosexuals because ”Allah” reasons, so why are homosexuals endorsing Muhammadanism?
solange silverman says
I really don’t know how much more of the lies I can take. It is all just too much to watch those we know, and those we don’t know continue to blindly absorb and regurgitate the insane lies they are told. I guess it just shows that what Joseph Goebbels said is true. So many, so very brain washed and too lazy to research and to find out the truth for themselves. It is very disheartening when not even an attack like this one, actually, multiple attacks like this one around the world can wake them from their stupor.