Wanting to defend Americans from jihad massacres makes Trump a “piece of s**t,” and “embarrassment to America,” a “stain on the presidency,” and an “embarrassment to humankind.”
Reza Aslan has never used such strong language against, say, Islamic jihad mass murderers. Seven people are dead and twenty wounded at the hands of Islamic jihadists in London tonight, but to Reza Aslan, it is President Trump who is the piece of s**t. The jihadis are not, evidently, pieces of s**t or embarrassments to anyone. What is embarrassing is wanting to resist jihad attack. Surrender, as far as this fashionable young Islamic supremacist cannibal is concerned, is so much cooler.
Robert Lippincott says
INTERESTING – Did you know?
To:
Oh By The Way …………………..
Wouldn’t it be interesting if, at some point during the Presidential campaign, one of the candidates asked, “Oh, by the way, has anyone in Washington DC ever heard of the McCarran-Walter Act Of 1952?
I did not know of this Act until recently, but it has been a law for almost 65 years.
Here are the historic facts that would seem to indicate that many, if not most, of the people we elect to work for us in Washington DC do not have the slightest idea of what laws already exist in OUR country.
After several terrorist incidents were carried out in the United States, Donald Trump was severely, criticized for suggesting that the U.S. should limit or temporarily suspend the immigration of certain ethnic groups, nationalities, and even people of certain religions (Muslims).
The criticisms condemned such a suggestion as, among other things, being Un-American, dumb, stupid, reckless, dangerous and racist. Congressmen and Senators swore that they would never allow such legislation, and our President called such a prohibition on immigration unconstitutional.
As Gomer Pyle would say, “Well, Surprise, Surprise!” It seems that the selective immigration ban is already law and has been applied on several occasions.
Known as the McCarran-Walter Act, the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 allows for the “Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by the President, whenever the President finds that the entry of aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States. The President may, by proclamation, and for such a period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or non-immigrants, or impose any restrictions on the entry of aliens he may deem to be appropriate.”
And who do you suppose last utilized this process? Why it was president Jimmy Carter, no less than 37 years ago, in 1979, to keep Iranians out of the United States.
But he actually did more. He made ALL Iranian students, already in the United States, check in with the government. And then he deported a bunch of them. Seven thousand were found in violation of their visas, and a total of 15,000 Iranians were forced to leave the USA in 1979.
So, what say you about all of the criticism that Donald Trump received from the Democrat Senators, Representatives and the Obama Administration?
Additionally, it is important to note that the McCarran-Walter Act also requires that an “applicant for immigration must be of good moral character and in agreement with the principles of our Constitution.”
Therefore, one could surmise that since the Quran forbids Muslims to swear allegiance to the U.S. Constitution, technically, ALL Muslims should be refused immigration to OUR country.
Authenticated at: http://library.uwb.edu/static/” href=”http://library.uwb.edu/static/” target=”_blank”>http://library.uwb.edu/static/ USimmigration/1952_immigration _and_nationality_act.html Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 http://library.uwb.edu/” href=”http://library.uwb.edu/ ” target=”_blank”>library.uwb.edu US immigration legislation online : 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act, a.k.a. the McCarran-Walter Act (An act to revise the laws relating to immigration .
jihad3tracker says
Thank you, Mr. Lippincott, for this excellent post.
Robert Lippincott says
You are so welcome and I would bet Most members of Congress and all Americans do not know we have this Law. This shows once again how Congress Passes Laws and then never Enforces them. So Sad, We are in the Swamp for sure.
gravenimage says
True, Robert–many people are not aware of this. These court blocks to Trump’s ban are not even legal.
p says
Ask Waters about this. CNN on London jihad attacks: we don’t know “their motives”
What a pile from our muslim media..
https://twitter.com/thepatriot143/status/871532827145375747?t=1&cn=ZmxleGlibGVfcmVjc18y&iid=0205e875b71645f6a0cd2f419020e5f4&uid=1590754878&nid=244+281088008
jihad3tracker says
Do you want to tell Reza what we think of him? Here is an email path: reza.aslan@ucr.edu.
For a look at his ultra-high maintenance “WIFE” — Jessica Jackley, do a Google search.
My crystal ball reveals that Reza has been an embarrassment to Jessica for about 10 years, and the cat fights over who is a prettier femme goes on night by night.
TheDane says
Interesting! I stumbled across this article, where the moslem scumbag, Azlan, praises his ‘interfaith marriage’ with the so-called Christian woman, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/susan-katz-miller/reza-aslan-and-jessica-ja_b_3671342.html
I doubt that she is a Christian, because how can light have any fellowship with darkness, as it says in the Bible?
Ascender says
Thanks! I just wrote him to tell him he called the president a piece of shit for suggesting an action that happens to already be a law, cited the law, and told him that HE is the piece of shit.
abad says
Maybe Trump can deport Reza Ali back to Tehran.
My college Persian language professor made a number of Reza Ali jokes – saying it’s like being called “Jim Bob” here in the USA.
LMFAO
gravenimage says
TheDane wrote:
Interesting! I stumbled across this article, where the moslem scumbag, Azlan, praises his ‘interfaith marriage’ with the so-called Christian woman…
……………………..
This is not “interfaith”–Muslim men have always been able to marry–and just rape–Infidel women.
Ask Aslan if he is OK with Infidel men marrying Muslim women…
Katnis says
+1 – Awesome post! Thank you.
p says
Tell him you are marrying a muslim, and you will covert her to Judaism, then do the rest of her family. Ask him the best way to do it, and forward the results to the women’s groups media.
David says
Yes an excellent post. Political correctness seems to have replaced common sense and progressives refusal to acknowledge reality is getting scary. They seem willing to destroy our culture rather than “offend” Muslims.
I read that there was a freeze on immigration in the nineteen-twenties until 1965 to give the thousands/millions of immigrants time to assimilate to our culture.
Muslims have no intention of doing so. Some are “radicals” and others wait until they outnumber us. They worship the same Bible, the Quran and believe in the same god, Allah.
I read that Poland and Slovenia have little to no terrorism because they don’t accept Muslims into their country, smart.
Obama has planted Muslims all over the country and nothing good can come of it. It’s reported that they are multiplying 4 times as fast as Americans.
Kathy Brown, Esq. says
I just posted the text of McCarran-Walter on a UK site reporting the London massacre. Stellar post Sir.
If we do not FINALLY say what must be said, that ALL MUSLIMS must be banned from the USA under this act (and several more, dating from 1790), we will not stop the slaughter.
My late husband was an Englishman, and I love the UK as I love-almost-my own country. But more than that even: I cannot stand to see these vermin cause death and mayhem all over the world, wherever they draw [wasted] breath.
Wellington says
I too, Kathy, am for a total ban on further Muslim immigration to America but the elites still have their head up their ass. First thing that must be done is to once and for all describe Islam, ALL OF IT, in the negative. Can’t really go anywhere, constitutionally or legally, until this occurs. Utilizing something like the McCarran Act could provide some tactical victories here and there but this falls far short of any grand strategy.
Should proper assessment of Islam occur, i.e., it is malevolent and inimical to liberty, then I think we could finagle around the First and Fourteenth Amendments by placing national security above an evil religious ideology, though I know you as a lawyer know only too well how religious freedom and equality under the law will not be easy to put in a secondary place but I would argue that there is a compelling national interest which makes it imperative we do just this with Islam. You can still be a Muslim and practice your wretched faith here in America but Islam needs to be looked upon by most everyone as a spiritual version of Nazism. Muslims should be looked upon with about as much favor as members of the Ku Klux Klan. Not there yet. Not sure we ever will be. Still a long way to go. Long way.
Marc says
Need to enlighten the populace. Copy & paste everywhere:
Give a good listen on youtube to Christopher Hitchens & all he had to say about Islam. Then listen to Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Sam Harris, Douglas Murray, Tarek Fatah, Brigitte Gabriel, Dr. Bill Warner, JajaborTheNomad (ex-Muslim preacher), Pat Condell. Get a hold of “The People Vs. Muhammad” and “Muslim Mafia.”
We are not racists or bigots. We are truth-seekers-tellers.
Michael Poulin says
The bigger problem is un-elected Federal judges legislating from the bench, and an out-of-control Federal bureacracy
The time has come for the States to hold a constitutional convention to restrict the Federal over-reach. That means:
1. no federal judges decision takes effect until 80% of the state legislatures sign on to it. This would start the flow of power back to the states and the people where it belongs.
2. the States need to decide what powers the Federal government will have, not the other way around.. .
Washington needs to feel the wrath of the 10th Amendment.
Shmooviyet says
Thumbs up, Kathy Brown.
Your comment on your English husband hit home. My mother is British, suffering dementia, and it is a strange ‘relief’ that she has only good memories of her early English life. It would crush her, and so many of her generation, to realize what’s happened to their beloved England and its citizens.
gravenimage says
Hear, hear, Kathy!
p says
Close, but not quite right. They are anti-american culture, and need to ALL go home. People born in the US following Islam are seditionists and should be offered the choice of emigrating or Gitmo
gravenimage says
Exactly, Robert.
mortimer says
JUDGES who did not KNOW the McCarran-Walter Act Of 1952 or who did not SEARCH AND FIND the McCarran-Walter Act Of 1952 SHOULD BE RELIEVED of their jobs.
It is obvious that the McCarran-Walter Act Of 1952 gives the president to restrict any alien from entering by HIS DECREE.
Zub says
This act isn’t the first of its kind. Look up the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, and the Geary Act of 1892 & 1902. If the US didn’t halt the huge amounts of immigration coming from Asia, we all might be speaking Cantonese as the official language.
DV says
Very interesting, R. Lippincott. I saw a Feb. 10, 2017 blog post under the name of Olive Oyl (http://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2017/02/the-mccarran-walter-act-of-1952.html) that you have repeated in large part almost verbatim. Are you also Olive Oyl?
In any case, the act is well-known to those involved with Trump’s Executive Order, and the more liberal courts are relying on so-called exceptions to banning entire members of a religious group to rule against the order. Carter rejected Iranians whereas it is maintained by various judges et al. that Trump’s intention is to ban an entire religious group. This is bogus, but such is the excuse used to reject the Trump Executive Order, and such will remain to block the order until the Supreme Court ultimately decides that Trump does indeed have the power (both Constitutionally and under the McCarran-Walter Act) to name any group, including alleged or actual religious groups.
Demsci says
Great great post. Gives us a good, reasonable, I think actionable rudimentary idea for finally doing something about the threat of a (big) part of Islam and a (big) part of the Muslims. I mean I suppose Islam has some good and harmless parts and accruements and there are a lot of decent peaceful Muslims.
But it is no longer reasonable to give Muslims unlimited freedom of religion and to forbid discrimination on grounds of religion, as religion must be considered a choice, a responsibility.
I don’t know how exactly the authorities can hold Muslims accountable and monitor them MORE than all other citizens. But yes, DISCRIMINATION on grounds of religion, this huge taboo, must sooner or later be adopted by Democratic Nations.
Now? Authorities may not even ASK about someone’s primary loyalties for laws and nations, without being accused of Discrimination. Extra monitoring on grounds of religion is also prohibited by law.
WPM says
There good germens during World War 2 we were at war we did not let them immigrate rightfully the only move with a country we are at war with. We did not let them come here because we were at war and could not trust them, we are at war with Islam they have many times in from many different countries declare war on us , have attack us ,Us being all the Middle Eastern, Asian, Africa, European, North ,South ,Central Americas who are not Islamic. It is not just a religion that the progressives just keep the MSM yamming about ,we on this site know it is a Nazi mind set. It has never excepted any other beliefs ,or governments laws outside of its own. It is the school yard bully, the jack boot Nazi, and worst the mad religious people bend on murder , because Islamics think it pleases there god. There ticket to there heaven is murder, crushing the spirts souls and beliefs of everyone even there own kind.
carol says
WPM..you’re so correct, which is why it is so ludicrous to see nations lumbering behind this vile behemoth trying to get a grasp on its tail.
Budvarakbar says
” I mean I suppose Islam has some good and harmless parts and accruements and there are a lot of decent peaceful Muslims.”
The EXACT same comment was true of Germans and Nazis — Hitler’s major mistake was being too honest in not claiming a visit from the angel Gabriel while he was in prison and then claiming divine inspiration for his book – Mein Kampf – “My Struggle” — more accurately translated to “My JIHAD”!
Pong says
“…there are a lot of decent peaceful Muslims”.
There are none.
Ask christian in Iraq. They will tell you about “decent and peaceful” moslems, their neighbors, with whom they shared meals, looked after each other children, borrowed money (no interest charged), went to each other weddings and funerals. They couldn’t believe that the same people started to rob, rape and kill them, as soon as sharia came to the neighborhood.
Decency and moslem is an oxymoron. Mostly durty, uneducated, low IQ, lazy and indecent in every respect, they have audacity to think of themselves as the best of people (koran says so).
Every moslem carries islam in his mind and personality. Try to make a list of things, which make us call someone a human. No moslem can fit such a list.
Forget about decency, they cannot be considered humans according to accepted standards.
One of the biggest problem we face is that too many people think that there is something good about islam and moslems. There isn’t.
Some of the post use words like death and killing in connection to moslems. It is most unfortunate. Let them do whatever they want with their beliefs and their life, but not in our countries. If they want to stay or immigrate, only apostates should be admitted.
don vito says
I am so glad you posted this, I, too, remember reading what the kufr victims of Islamic aggression said of their moslem neighbors turing jihadi when having the chance. You have written it very well, congrats, well done.
gravenimage says
All grimly true, Pong.
Carolyne says
I, too, believe there are no peaceful Muslims. IMO every Muslim is secretly proud today of last night’s events in London.
abad says
Christians want to convert you.
Muslims want to kill you.
That is the primary difference between Christianity and Islam.
It cannot be put in a more simple way.
Myron J. Poltroonian says
¡Yo! ¡Yo Bad! You forgot to mention one other minor detail regarding “Conversion” (since the Reformation). “Christians” want to “Convert” you by sending “The God Squad” dressed in white sport shirts, slacks and with clean haircuts, around to your door on Saturdays with pamphlets, smiles words and and such. Muslims seem to want to convert you “By the Sword”, or else.
Alexander says
Indeed, thank you. Knowing the facts will bring us victory over Islam-Ideology..
Kim Bruce says
The law repealed the last of the existing measures to exclude Asian immigration, allotted each Asian nation a minimum quota of 100 visas each year, and eliminated laws preventing Asians from becoming naturalized American citizens.
ninetyninepct says
Please pass this on to every politician you can.
Carolyne says
I knew there was such a law and I knew it had been implemented before but I did not know it’s name. However, I do remember when the US had quotas for each country from which immigrants could come, giving preference to those from Western Europe, which had the highest quota. To liberals, of course, Saint Jimmy could d ono wrong so his banning Iranians was OK for him, but not for President Trump.
I am tired of liberals objecting to every move which Mr. Trump makes and this Aslan person, obviously a Middle-Eastern name, has no right to say such things as he is likely from the Middle East cesspool and his parents were most likely first cousins, which would account for his low intelligence. “Aslan” in Turkish means “Lion,” and I believe Reza to be an Iranian name. How dare he disrespect the office of the President of the United States. Muslim trash.
abad says
Reza is a very common name for guys in Iran this dude was born in Tehran I have NO idea what he is doing in the United States to begin with.
And the Looney Left cannot even argue that “Oh he was born here” BS because he WASN’T.
Aslan is a foreigner, a religious alien (Islam needs to be treated as an alien element of society and I don’t mean the kind from outer space!) and if he doesn’t watch out he’ll have his butt deported back to Tehran courtesy of Trump.
Sons of Liberty says
Exactly ! Not only that law ,..but the US Constitution clearly places national defense in the Executive Branch ,..under the Commander in Chief . President Trump has the right to do what is necessary to protect the citizens of the United States . The Founding Fathers certainly did not want the defense of our Country being decided by a bunch of unelected judges. This case will decide whether the US Supreme Court will uphold the Constitution .
Mike says
I’m very happy to see R. A is angry. It means things doesn’t work out as he wish. Thanks Trump ! Go ahead and double -down !!!!
A Woman says
Thanks for posting this–I thought I was the only one who knew about this.
R Cole says
It is almost certain that Trump’s travel ban would be backed by the Supreme Court. The reason for the lower courts overturning it was based on what Trump said in the campaign, but the executive order is a separate legal document and has constitutional backing. Trump needs to rubber stamp this no matter how long it takes.
Not doing so could open the door to foreign influence over American’s national security. You could see foreign agents acting to through US courts, to overturn future executive orders, which seek to ban certain dangerous groups from entering.
Tradiguy says
Unfortunately for the peaceful Muslims and I understand there are some, the only way to completely protect our Christian way of life is to eject every single one from western nations. We cannot have these Satan believers in our midst. Not possible? Then the blood will continue to flow!!! Until we realise that we are at war and that the devil is on the march against Christianity nothing will change WAKE UP!! Or as surely as the sun will rise tomorrow we will continue to see atrocities that we used to see only in Islamic countries. Islam is a satanic death cult and unless we protect ourselves we will continue to roll over and die. Do not suck in all the propaganda from the various MSM. Do not believe we are not cowed, Do not believe that we are united and that we stand together. Do not believe that things will get better- they won’t! The devil wants you dead! He hates hates hates and his troops are the devil infested muslims who swear allegiance to that Satanic crap- the Koran. The cowards will continue to kill us as we are unarmed and virtually helpless. Your leaders are to blame for this apocalypse and we need to kick them out to a man and start again – not possible? I say again – Christian blood will continue to flow which is exactly what those bastards want. Trump is, without doubt, someone who appears to care for the lives of his countrymen- that’s why the braindead liberal left continue to attack him unabated. They will not escape either!
Jan III Sobieski says
Aslan is becoming more upset because the travel ban will make it more difficult to get more Jihadists into the US. Aslan is a clear and present danger to Western Civilization.
MacUalraig says
Yes. Trump is a POS because he wants to defend natural human rights from the jihadis.
Naturally Asian has a problem with that.
Westman says
Has anyone noticed that Aslan’s behavior is getting more instable; approaching that of Kathy Griffin? What a poor reflection on the UC education system that employs him.
abad says
Of course he is.
How much you wanna bet his green card expired three decades ago.
Tradiguy says
Here here !!
BLC says
It sounds like projection to me.
jihad3tracker says
If Jihad Watch readers do not already know of closeted-gay coward Reza Aslan, Robert has posts up about him. Use the search box to find them.
common sense says
Hear hear Robert! I’m sure Aslan will get plenty more well deserved backlash.
Richie says
Notice how leftists just using gutter level profanity?
Westman says
It’s amazing how their claim of, “they go low, we go high”, is such a disaster. Maher drops the N- word, Griffin drops the head, Baldwin flips his wig, Aslan cries sh–t, Sarsour defends FGM, and Amy Schumer vomits vulgarity while giving lessons on anatomy.
The left’s role models…
Shmooviyet says
@Richie: Agreed.
These kinds of childish “nyaah” attacks make them look ridiculous and show increasing desperation. The charges of ‘racism’ and ‘phobia’ are getting boring and ineffective at shutting down truth speech. Frustrated leftists and islamapologists are left with dumb adolescent language; the stuff they likely used as teen bullies.
chuck de gaul says
My observations on the demoncratic communist leftist are that they have never matured past their teen years or so. Still gotta be part of the group… Leftist educators never have gotten away from the culture of children and act like it. Very sad its not an act. Its all about me!
Carolyne says
Yes, I’ve noticed the lack of vocabulary of liberals and their inability to not refrain from obscenity. It is all they know. The English language has more words than any other language and these idiots are so limited in their intelligence they cannot express themselves without obscenity.
Mr. Aslan should be familiar with pieces of “Sh*t,” since he is one himself. He needs to learn more acceptable Anglo-Saxon words.
Dave says
Not to worry, he is a moderate.
David says
Yes…as moderate as Genghis Khan.
Dee Miller says
Thus continues the disturbing trend of the lef degrad8ng and demonizing those with which they disagree. Even worse when it is POTUS, I predict evil times ahead….
KP says
For singing to the tune of “Onward Christian Soldiers”:
Onward Kafir Soldiers! Marching as to war!
Life, love, truth and reason going on before.
With true words and righteous might set all people free.
Forward into battle! On to victory!
Onward Kafir Soldiers! Marching as to war!
Life, love, truth and reason going on before.
“Onward Christian Soldiers” was President Eisenhower’s favorite hymn.
Bill says
I guess that CNN is ISIS.
Don McKellar says
Reza Asslan is desperate for attention from his left-fascist enablers and promoters. You know what you might try, Reza? Why don’t you do a Kathy Griffin style photo shoot? That will get you all the attention you could hope for.
underbed cat says
I wonder who recruited the Griffen to do this photo shoot, which is like the signs isis carries…..does she not get it. This happens in sharia promoting terror groups and on the streets of Europe, and even in this country at job sites, I think Kansas…to one woman and another survived. It is what Trump is trying to ban, a growing population of potentials that get pious…not hijacked as Rez tries to promote as he shows his bad manners and uses free speech to do it, which ironically is just the silencing of the truth by his religion requires, no truth about the doctrine.
gravenimage says
A Muslim beheaded a woman at work in Oklahoma. There may have been other murders.
Oliver says
Perhaps he could do it on himself. Or any lefty in Congress. Or the judges in the 4th and 9th circuits.
Be doing the country a favor
mortimer says
Robert Spencer shrewdly observes, “Reza Aslan has never used such strong language against, say, Islamic jihad mass murderers”.
No! Reza Aslan is A JIHADIST who APPROVES of JIHAD. Reza Aslan LOVES jihad.
Reza Aslan will NOT condemn the JIHADISTS or SWEAR AT THEM. Reza Aslan privately LOVES ISLAMIC TERRORISM while publicly VIRTUE-SIGNALLING.
Reza, it’s wearing thin.
gravenimage says
Yes–very telling.
No Fear says
I call on Reza Aslan to call Mohammed a “piece of shit”.
Mohammed and his ideology are behind the terror attacks, not Trump.
Come on Reza, repeat after me: “Mohammed is a piece of shit, Mohammed is a piece of shit , Mohammed is a piece of shit…..”.
See. It’s easy when you try.
Demsci says
Yes, by all means compare Donald Trump with Mohammed. As David Wood did. Then note that Trump want to ban citizens of a specific group of countries coming into America.
Mohammed? He wanted all Jews out of Arabia, including long time resident Jews. Much worse attitude and law.
Rena’s double standards are appalling.
Oh, he can fall back on the excuse that Mohammed’s actions and laws were 7th century time-bound, but then what is and what is not still operational in Islam? And he then certainly will be contradicting many Tafsirs and Islamic Scholars!
No Fear says
“Death to Amerika, of course” – Ayatollah Khamenei
Dara Smythe says
:>)) ?
Heather says
No Ham & Mad or Mad Mo preferred males.
gary fouse says
The Sh– is what jihadists did in London. And Aslan goes after Trump? What a jerk!
WPM says
Asian does what Islamics were bought up to say and do blame the Kaffar for Islamics killing the Kaffar.The Kaffer can not have houses bigger then Islamics the Kaffar can not worship in front of Isamics .The Kaffar should not drink or eat in front of Islamics when the Islamic fast. The Kaffar should not enjoy music in front of Islamics it all there in the holy Koran ,Hadiths. The MSM are perfect Dhimms for the Islamics, cowards who are willing to sell there children and grand children to not offend Islamics and risk the losing the next talk show on cable they so much need to fill there ever expanding ego.
Dawn says
Blaming Trump agsin , stop blaming him blame those who let the Islamist terrorist in your country.
Kay says
Really offensive. But I see he got lots of “likes” and retweets. Disgusting.
tgusa says
This foreigner presumes to tell us what America stands for? Reza we don’t need or want you here. Leave, get out, go home. And soon, please.
Dara Smythe says
???
No Fear says
A group of muslims kill UK citizens while shouting “This is for Allah” and somehow Trump is a “P.O.S.” because he wants to enforce border control? FFS.
David says
Robert Spencer, could you please start an online petition to send Reza Aslan to Guantanamo Bay? I would be more than happy to give my vote.
Dara Smythe says
ME2!!!
Katnis says
Reza Aslan – Who do you think you are? You weren’t put into office to protect citizens of the United States. Clearly, that’s the last thing on your mind. You seem more content passing judgement on our elected leadership and barking out nonsensical tweets while jihadis slaughter innocents. Look in the mirror. You’re the embarrassment.
Dara Smythe says
EXACTLY!
No Fear says
Close the borders. Then deport all who profess allegiance to Mohammed. Send them all to Islamic countries to fight ISIS themselves rather than expecting Americans or French or British to fight for them. Any muslim who will sign a waiver disavowing their allegiance to Mohammed can stay. Anyone who pretends to hold up the severed head of the President or calls the President a POS can be deported as well. Make them fight ISIS. Westerners should NOT even have to fight ISIS.
The Mayor says
Unfortunately, taqiyya allows muslims to act dishonestly to further the aims of islam, so, any waiver that a muslim would sign would not be done in good faith.
Budvarakbar says
“Any muslim who will sign a waiver disavowing their allegiance to Mohammed can stay.”
That would be an extremely FATAL mistake !
Carolyne says
Fatal for whom?
Demsci says
the waiver you mention should at least be about comparison and first and subsequent loyalties.
Muslims may have allegiance to relative harmless Islamic commands and have relatively neutral loyalties.
But when they have to choose between contradicting laws of Islam and of Western Democratic Nations they must sign to favor the latter over the former. Likewise if the interests of Islamic countries and groups (or their Russian and other allies) contradict with those of Western Democratic Nations, they must sign that they hold loyalty to the latter higher than to the former.
To many of us this indeed seems an exercise in futility, because even if Muslims sign off on this, we know that most are lying or that most will renege.
But that is not the point, as I see it. This “waiver” or loyalty declaration is only meant to satisfy the fence sitters, the undecided waverers among us.
As we explain to these waverers that there IS genuine contradiction between the commands of Islam, according to the Islamic texts and scholars and hundreds of Millions of Muslims, and the basic tenets and values of Western Democratic Nations.
And we can cater to the needs of our own “waverers” to be fair and impartial by pointing out that:
If the countless Islamic, political and media descriptions of Islam were true (which I reject) even then we from the counterjihadist perspective have so much evidence of the other highly popular Islam-interpretation still is detrimental to our values and tenets and safety. Meaning that the confusion inside Islam alone warrants a special attention on Muslims and their choices, loyalties and responsibilities.
the whole exercise of the waiver you mention should be about finally getting majorities in parliament, which then finally will allow laws to hold Moslims accountable, monitor them more, reject them more for immigration than all other citizens and immigrants. In order words; to finally to not forbid, but allow discrimination on grounds of religion.
Only, for the benefit of the waverers we should give Muslims pro forma a chance. Which they will largely blow of course, but this we can then show to these waverers, who now are still so ignorant,confused and stubborn.
Jack Diamond says
Regarding such waiver, keep in mind:
A hadith says “Hakaj ibn ‘Aalat told: ‘O Prophet of Allah: I have in Mecca some excess wealth and some relatives, and I would like to have them back; am I excused if I bad-mouth you (to fool non-Muslims)? The Prophet excused him and said ‘Say whatever you have to say.’”
Surah 16:106: “The nonbelievers arrested `Ammar Ibn Yasir and tortured him until he uttered foul words about the Prophet (Muhammad), and praised their gods and idols; and when they released him, he went straight to the Prophet. The Prophet said: “Is there something on your mind?” `Ammar Ibn Yasir said: “Bad news! They would not release me until I defamed you and praised their gods!” The Prophet said: “How do you find your heart to be?” `Ammar answered: “Comfortable with faith.” So the Prophet said: “Then if they come back for you, then do the same thing all over again.” Allah at that moment revealed the verse: “….except under compulsion, his heart remaining firm in faith…”
Ibn Kathir: “This refers to a group of people who were oppressed in Mecca and whose position with their own people was weak, so they went along with them when they were tried by them… Allah tells them that after this, meaning after their giving in (to the non-Muslims by denying their faith) when put to the test, He will forgive them and show mercy to them when they are resurrected. ”
You don’t depend on Muslims to “moderate” themselves, you impose it on them.
Jack Diamond says
first commentary from Sirah al-Halabiyyah v3 p.61
16:106 “Whoever disbelieves in Allah after his belief… except for one who is forced [to renounce his religion] while his heart is secure in faith…”
Demsci says
Most interesting Jack. Impressive your knowledge of Islam. And I mean of: Quran-Sira-Hadith, but also the Tafsirs. And I suspect you know a lot about the 4 schools of thought; Shafi-Hanafi-Hanbali-Maliki, and about Al Azhar, and sundry Islamic Scholars. And perhaps also about the real history of Islam as told by Robert Spencer, Tom Holland, Jay Smith.
we are in agreement; begging Muslims to change and reform Islam is 100 % useless. No, we need a majority of 51 % of our own citizens to impose rules and controls on them.
But I suppose we could use what Islam-apologists tell US all the time. whether they lie or not, they keep telling us interpretations of Quran-Sira-Hadiths that are at odds with various Tafsirs and Islamic Scholars. Only they don’t mention them. But we can and point out how leading knowledgeable Muslims, apologists and Tafsirs/ Islamic scholars, contradict each other, in the way that they all follow Quran-Sira-Hadith, which are supposed to be divine, but not the Tafsirs and Islamic scholars, who are only human.
The apologists, lying or not, go against taking Mohammed’s commands as prescriptive (and only descriptive) and abrogation of peaceful verses for example.
the big corpus of Islam, which seems so massively clear, is therewith reduced to a multi-interpretable confusing and dangerous collection.
Maybe we can use that to our advantage, in our negotiations with our own fence-sitters.
No Fear says
I don’t like who got voted in but I also don’t like the excessively derogatory comments about the man who was voted President. That is why I said what I said. We are lucky to have democracy.
Henner720 says
Oh oh… revieled . Globalist elite advantages world wide travel and luxury, prize being jihadist oilmoneysponsered in your backyard. After suffering death, you have to accept the wrath of globalists like reza. Im dumb and stupid.but bit by bit my patience wears off.
Guest says
Some said the exact same thing about Obama
Susan B says
In the case of obama, they were speaking the truth. Check out who supported his fellow jihadist and open borders.
Carolyne says
“Some said the same thing about Obama.” So?
Philo sophy says
To reject religion is not racist. Better late than never; Decide to make American totally free from all religion, includes Islam. No mosques–No religious book-Quran–No preachers,….hold all religion as threat to Nation, threat to Civilization….threat to citizen. It is state’s duty as well as right to make citizen safe from religious violence and hatred.
Budvarakbar says
Islam is NOT a religion — screw off a$$hole!
Carolyne says
I am an Atheist. I would never wish to ban all religions, only those which have violence at its core. BTW, there is only one which qualifies.
I understand that most religions are a civilizing influence and a comfort to their adherents. I would not try to take that away from them so long as it does not affect me adversely.
gravenimage says
Thank you, Carolyne.
gravenimage says
So you want to crush all religious freedom, including those which values represent the moral basis of this nation–because Muslims, who represent less than 1% of the population, adhere to an ugly creed?
Somehow I very much doubt that opposing the threat of Islam is your goal here at all.
JC Court says
@ Rezla Azlam. Islamic Jihadists (who kills innocents) are an embarrassment to humankind. Thanks.
Joy D. Brower says
WOW! I knew Aslan was a hypocrite & coward, but the “closet gay” part was new to me! No wonder he won’t, can’t or doesn’t want to go to Iran, his ancestral home! He’s such a POS – and, from what little I know about him, HE’S the embarrassment to just about anything or anyone with whom he associates. I get angry just thinking that he’s allowed to live in the same COUNTY (Riverside) that I do! i pity the poor students who are getting a first-class brainwashing from this piece of crap!
Koosemo says
Aslan=Vermin
SPIT
J. Walker says
What would have happened in the 40s, 50s or 60s if you had publicly called the President of the United States a piece of shit ???
How is it that this can happen nowadays and go totally unpunished ???
Gen Jones says
Unpunished? This isn’t Iran or North Korea. We can say what we like about our leaders. Common courtesy and social mores of the past were usually enough to prevent this type of direct vulgarity but this is a free speech issue and Reza is well within his right to call Trump anything he wishes. This proves the point that allowing free speech is better than banning hate speech because the character of the speaker is revealed. The punishment, if it comes, is when CNN and UC Riverside decide that keeping Reza as their pet spokesperson isn’t worth falling viewers and condemnation by the general public. Even people who despise Trump felt Kathy Griffin went too far and the reply by CNN was swift. Reza will overstep and fall from grace soon as well.
gravenimage says
Agreed, Gen. The best thing to do with Aslan is expose his ugly agenda–particularly his apologia for Jihad.
Jayke says
This type of terrorism will be a problem until the people who believe in the Koran are a distant memory.
Jessica says
Dear Robert,
Ed Milliband, of Labour, is saying he will make Islamophobia a criminal offence, adding to the law in 2006, the incitement against religious and racial hatred thing that has prevented anyone from saying anything about how bad Islam is and as a result we had all those rapes and so on. He and Labour will, by this new law, create a Sharia-governed state. Please help. Someone came canvassing on the part of Labour and I said, ‘you want an Islamic invasion and I’m only voting for someone who will shut our borders and make Islam illegal’ and she whined – white, British – I hate them all. I think Tony Blair, Theresa May, Ed Milliband and everyone who has ever said either that Islam is a religion of peace or that to critique it is Islamophobic taken to a public place, tied to a stake and left there for Muslims who want to follow the directives of their faith to kill them as non-believers or hypocrites or have the lot departed or imprisoned as traitors to our country which is a vast number either dying or leaving the UK to go to sharia dominated countries. They have chosen this – I have not.
Anyhows take a look at Milliband and Labour for your next piece as this is a government who won’t just ban you but anyone saying anything.
I don’t weep for my country. I detest it. I hate everyone who called Trump Hitler – as far as I’m concerned from the moment Labour got in in 1997 genocide was inflicted on the people of Britain by forcing them to accept mass immigration from people with a mandate to murder them and to love them too, on pain of being declared racist. That is genocide isn’t it? Like feeding everyone a new health drink that will kill them, and also making them pay over the odds for it and it being mandatory for them to drink it?
Can anyone marry me to get me a visa to get me out?
Jessica
Robert Lippincott says
Every Word You Say is True. The problem is that if we don’t unite to fight these Fools we will be taken over by them (They are winning now) and our countries and Politics are such a bunch of “Wussies” and afraid of their own shadows. (Bring Back The Crusaders and kick their asses back to those sand dunes. ) Thanks for Your Post.
Demsci says
Unite enough as in getting 51 % majorities, supporting finally acting and effective governments.
But for that to happen, I think we should sort of negotiate. Not with ANY Muslims, but with largely well meaning, fair minded, Islam-ignorant, or even disinterested, Western Democratic Citizens.
You see, a main concern of a large group of Western Democratic Citizens is global warming. I don’t believe in this problem as they do, BUT I for one would like our leaders to negotiate quid pro quo’s;
– If you help us with safety measures against Islam and violent supremacist Muslims, then we will concede what you ask from us for decreasing CO2-emission, in like measure.
– but not before, if so many of you refuse to take us serious and block and mock us all the way, OKay, then we will block and mock YOUR CONCERNS.
I mean, when first Islam conquers and destroys big parts of our world as we know it, what do we care if subsequently global warming causes other catastrophes?
Carolyne says
If I were not a woman, Jessica, I would marry you. Oh, wait a minute!!!!!! This could be an interesting test case.
The last time I was in London, and I DO mean the last time, I got on a tube at the Gloucester Street Station and at the next station, a young middle-eastern man got on and leaned a back pack against a pole atthe back exit. I got off at the next station because of this, but I did not report it because I know of the consequences in England if one mentions Islam in the same sentence as terrorist. I did not want to spend the rest of my vacation locked behind bars in an English jail.
As it happened, it was not an explosive and I am glad, but with the restrictions on free speech and the coddling of Muslims in England, I will never return.
Ace-of-Clubs says
Well said, Jessica. I too despair at the state of Britain now. I pray that Corbyn and his lefty loonies don’t get voted in on Thursday, they have all the support of the biased BBC of course, but I reckon they will fall short. Immigration rocketed under Blair as you rightly say, he wanted them for the votes as much as anything else. I detest the Labour party, the world’s worst appeasers of Islam.
gravenimage says
Don’t give up, Jessica!
Here’s more on the egregious Ed Miliband:
“Britain’s Labour Party Vows to Ban Islamophobia”
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/5665/uk-islamophobia-ban
“We are going to make it [Islamophobia] an aggravated crime. We are going to make sure it is marked on people’s records with the police to make sure they root out Islamophobia as a hate crime.
“We are going to change the law on this so we make it absolutely clear of our abhorrence of hate crime and Islamophobia. It will be the first time that the police will record Islamophobic attacks right across the country.”
Yes–this would be a full-blown “blasphemy” law. Just terrifying.
Tradiguy says
The Labour Party are morally bankrupt anyway- perfect bed fellows if you ask me. The only problem is that one of them will have a 10″ blade! Do these idiots really think that by protecting murdering, raping scum that they will somehow be spared from their savagery- just goes to show you that they live in cloud cuckoo land. Do you all remember Enoch Powells”rivers of blood” speech- European blood has started to flow and with idiots like Ed Milliband it will only increase to a tidal wave. God help us.
gravenimage says
Yes–they would be even worse than the feckless “conservatives” now.
Tradiguy says
I agree that there is no party with the balls to combat this evil. What ever happened to our British Character? It will be down to the ordinary folk to combat this evil. I would rather die than live under the yoke of Satan. Blair and his obnoxious henchmen have blood a plenty on their hands. I hated the man from the start and my instinct was right – he is an enemy of the state. Corbin is just an old fashioned communist with less of an idea than a cabbage – Blair knew exactly what he was doing!!
Mockingjay says
CNN = ISIS
Mockingjay says
CNN = ISIS
Mockingjay says
CNN = ISIS
Mockingjay says
REPEAT
socladdi@yahoo.ca says
No Reza, you with your reptilian brain and the likes of you are an embarrassment to humankind.
Alexander says
The european media call Trump`s tweet about immigration ban embarrassing. Does anybody see any logic in tnat? A President makes a suggestion how to protect citizens while the european leaders whine how tragic and sad yet another jihadi-attack is, instead of proposing a solution to deal with the mess we have in Europe due to immigration from islamic countries.
Robert Lippincott says
INTERESTING – Yes, I Know I have said this before and will keep saying till more People Understand that America is/ or supposed to be a Country of “LAWS”.
Did you know?
To:
Oh By The Way …………………..
Wouldn’t it be interesting if, at some point during the Presidential campaign, one of the candidates asked, “Oh, by the way, has anyone in Washington DC ever heard of the McCarran-Walter Act Of 1952?
I did not know of this Act until recently, but it has been a law for almost 65 years.
Here are the historic facts that would seem to indicate that many, if not most, of the people we elect to work for us in Washington DC do not have the slightest idea of what laws already exist in OUR country.
After several terrorist incidents were carried out in the United States, Donald Trump was severely, criticized for suggesting that the U.S. should limit or temporarily suspend the immigration of certain ethnic groups, nationalities, and even people of certain religions (Muslims).
The criticisms condemned such a suggestion as, among other things, being Un-American, dumb, stupid, reckless, dangerous and racist. Congressmen and Senators swore that they would never allow such legislation, and our President called such a prohibition on immigration unconstitutional.
As Gomer Pyle would say, “Well, Surprise, Surprise!” It seems that the selective immigration ban is already law and has been applied on several occasions.
Known as the McCarran-Walter Act, the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 allows for the “Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by the President, whenever the President finds that the entry of aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States. The President may, by proclamation, and for such a period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or non-immigrants, or impose any restrictions on the entry of aliens he may deem to be appropriate.”
And who do you suppose last utilized this process? Why it was president Jimmy Carter, no less than 37 years ago, in 1979, to keep Iranians out of the United States.
But he actually did more. He made ALL Iranian students, already in the United States, check in with the government. And then he deported a bunch of them. Seven thousand were found in violation of their visas, and a total of 15,000 Iranians were forced to leave the USA in 1979.
So, what say you about all of the criticism that Donald Trump received from the Democrat Senators, Representatives and the Obama Administration?
Additionally, it is important to note that the McCarran-Walter Act also requires that an “applicant for immigration must be of good moral character and in agreement with the principles of our Constitution.”
Therefore, one could surmise that since the Quran forbids Muslims to swear allegiance to the U.S. Constitution, technically, ALL Muslims should be refused immigration to OUR country.
Authenticated at: http://library.uwb.edu/static/” href=”http://library.uwb.edu/static/” target=”_blank”>http://library.uwb.edu/static/ USimmigration/1952_immigration _and_nationality_act.html Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 http://library.uwb.edu/” href=”http://library.uwb.edu/ ” target=”_blank”>library.uwb.edu US immigration legislation online : 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act, a.k.a. the McCarran-Walter Act (An act to revise the laws relating to immigration .
Jerry says
That’s some important historical facts, but islam’s leftists allies don’t care about facts. They are more concerned about their own agenda of destroying our freedoms for muslims’ religious perversions. It’s war, facts are suppressed for their multicultural propaganda to serve unicultural islam. And if thousands of our citizens must be slaughtered in the streets and our kids and women raped, then oh well, that’s the price we must pay to appease allah. And that really is their attitude about it. We must all acquiesce for their evil and violent religion even if it kills us. I’m sure this is why so many people turn to Spencer and Geller, and wilders too, for guidance. Because we know they teach life-saving truths about islam’s jihad agenda. They are the heroes for good morals and humanity. They should be honored, not vilified like racist bums.
Tradiguy says
The ‘Elite’ are using Islam for their own ends. They want the world population subjugated. They don’t want people to think. Thinkers can cause trouble! They want a ‘one world state’ and if a few million westerners have to die-?so what? We need people like the Don as we do oxygen and that’s why they are trying all they know to get rid of him – he is a danger to their agenda by giving freedom and prosperity back to the world. All good men should come to the flag- if we stand together to fight this evil called Islam, then God will help us in our quest,
Richard Paulsen says
What mankind? Who is an embarrassment. What is? Having my own ideas. Not alone.
Peacemaker says
Why don’t they blame Allah instead of Trump ?
Quran 9:73 – “O Prophet! against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be unyielding to them; and their abode is hell, and evil is the destination.”
So Allah call for “strive hard” in wake of London jihad attacks.
VRWC member77 says
Reza,
You’re a literal piece of sh*t, BAR NONE staining “humankind” for engaging in *** CANABILISM ****
Will says
The sewers Reza loves to wallow in makes him an expert on pieces of shit , izzlam being the biggest piece
Jerry says
Reza is one of those idiots that thinks it’s better that Americans should continue to lose their rights and security than to act responsibly to the muslim threat In his mind it makes more sense that we should punish ourselves than to attack the problem with pro-active solutions. We’re expected to sacrifice more with costly and inconvenient security, murdered innocents, raped women and children, dangerous enclaves, and cultural annihilation.
But my feeling is this, if someone has to suffer for muslims’ demon of death I want it to be them. No more of this f*cking hanging out waiting to be murdered or raped by muslims who think we’re just dhimmis for enslavement. I want the President to do what he promised, put an end to muslim immigration and get rid of the illegals and build that wall. We got hard working Mexicans getting deported but we let muslims import their totalitarian culture of death and oppression–and we’re dying for it. And that’s no defense of illegal Mexicans, I’m just saying this doesn’t make sense. Muslims bring their violent agenda and death wherever they go, the proof is in the news every f*cking day. It would be unethical and traitorous for Trump to ignore the grave threat muslims bring to our nation. He is legally and constitutionally bound to protect America and her people from foreign threats. I say, the best solution to that threat is to attack those who are causing the problem and stop attacking the victims. I’m pretty sure that’s war tactics 101.
gravenimage says
Jerry, Reza Aslan is not a clueless Leftist–he is a Muslim Taqiyya artist.
Matthieu Baudin says
Temporary Travel Bans – bring them on; deportations for (criminal) law breaking foreign nationals – bring them on. Military Trials with the possibility of the firing squad for militants who have murdered civilians – bring them on. Long Term Incarceration for known supporters of terrorist groups – thousands in the U.K. alone – let’s see the authorities start rounding them up first thing tomorrow. Reza who?
Robert Lippincott says
We already Have A LAW To Deal With and I Bet Most if not ALL Congress knows it.
Did you know?
To:
Oh By The Way …………………..
Wouldn’t it be interesting if, at some point during the Presidential campaign, one of the candidates asked, “Oh, by the way, has anyone in Washington DC ever heard of the McCarran-Walter Act Of 1952?
I did not know of this Act until recently, but it has been a law for almost 65 years.
Here are the historic facts that would seem to indicate that many, if not most, of the people we elect to work for us in Washington DC do not have the slightest idea of what laws already exist in OUR country.
After several terrorist incidents were carried out in the United States, Donald Trump was severely, criticized for suggesting that the U.S. should limit or temporarily suspend the immigration of certain ethnic groups, nationalities, and even people of certain religions (Muslims).
The criticisms condemned such a suggestion as, among other things, being Un-American, dumb, stupid, reckless, dangerous and racist. Congressmen and Senators swore that they would never allow such legislation, and our President called such a prohibition on immigration unconstitutional.
As Gomer Pyle would say, “Well, Surprise, Surprise!” It seems that the selective immigration ban is already law and has been applied on several occasions.
Known as the McCarran-Walter Act, the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 allows for the “Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by the President, whenever the President finds that the entry of aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States. The President may, by proclamation, and for such a period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or non-immigrants, or impose any restrictions on the entry of aliens he may deem to be appropriate.”
And who do you suppose last utilized this process? Why it was president Jimmy Carter, no less than 37 years ago, in 1979, to keep Iranians out of the United States.
But he actually did more. He made ALL Iranian students, already in the United States, check in with the government. And then he deported a bunch of them. Seven thousand were found in violation of their visas, and a total of 15,000 Iranians were forced to leave the USA in 1979.
So, what say you about all of the criticism that Donald Trump received from the Democrat Senators, Representatives and the Obama Administration?
Additionally, it is important to note that the McCarran-Walter Act also requires that an “applicant for immigration must be of good moral character and in agreement with the principles of our Constitution.”
Therefore, one could surmise that since the Quran forbids Muslims to swear allegiance to the U.S. Constitution, technically, ALL Muslims should be refused immigration to OUR country.
Authenticated at: http://library.uwb.edu/static/” href=”http://library.uwb.edu/static/” target=”_blank”>http://library.uwb.edu/static/ USimmigration/1952_immigration _and_nationality_act.html Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 http://library.uwb.edu/” href=”http://library.uwb.edu/ ” target=”_blank”>library.uwb.edu US immigration legislation online : 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act, a.k.a. the McCarran-Walter Act (An act to revise the laws relating to immigration
carol says
“Ground control to Major Tom…”
Mike says
I am astounded by the lack of courage our leaders here in Europe display. I am astounded how a man such as Reza Aslan can be allowed to say the things he does unchecked and unhindered.
Norger says
Unfortunately I don’t think this country, or the U.K., will identify the threat and take decisive action against it until there is a jihad terrorism attack in a major city with casualties numbering in at least hundreds of thousands. And that day is clearly coming. It’s only a matter of time.
underbed cat says
Norger, I fear that also…it is a major threat that found out how to reproduce itself thru population growth, wars, migration, deception and shaming but not without first modeling the characteristics of the target country it want to deceive and invade. Using the plan to silence the truth and put on a charitable face, acquiring skills of the perfect con to bring jihad and sharia.
It’s all in the doctrine…
Valkyrie Ziege says
; Many countries, especially Germany, have laws for immigration bans on anyone who is anti-Jewish, as well as laws for deportation of anyone who is anti-Jewish, so, why are all those countries letting in the Muhammadans whose doctrines are openly, and loudly, anti-Jewish. Hypocrisy, much?
johnnybigtime says
Hi Valkyrie.
I believe that everyone should have free speech and free religious beliefs; providing that they do not seek to harm anyone else, or advocate such behaviour.
Only the Muslim religion seeks to maim, mutilate and murder other people; there are 22 such passages in the Koran and 6 in the Hadith; exhorting its followers to physically harm others.
Therefore the Koran should be banned, and all the mosques closed or razed to the ground.
I would be happy if more people would promote this viewpoint, which is the only way to address the problem of Muslim evil.
Regards
johnnybigtime says
The pathetic ignoramus Reza Aslan should read the Bible, which was a completed book 700-1000 years before the Koran was cobbled together by satanically inspired murderers.
Allah does not exist; he was a fictitious moon god called Hubal, later changed to Allah; hence the crescent moon and star on their emblems.
Muslims claim that Moses was a prophet; yet he brought the ten commandments down from Mount Sinai; which state ‘Thou Shalt Not Kill’
Murderers (some Muslims) and unbelievers (all Muslims) shall have their portion in the lake which burns with fire and brimstone, which is the second death (Revelation 21).
1st death physical.
2nd death spiritual.
Tradiguy says
This Asan bloke? What a twat! Good job I’m not in charge you fucking arsehole- your feet wouldn’t have touched until you landed after being parachuted into ISIS territory! You are as bad as any Isis supporter, a brain dead jerk off!
Kiki says
The Supreme Court is expected to make a decision soon on the travel-ban. I STRONGLY urge everyone on here to contact them, and/or their gov representatives, and push for them to support it.
The more people who call for better protection against terrorism, the less the government will be able to dismiss them.
unbeleiver1 says
The Muslim mayor of London said there is no need for alarm.One would think that after previous attacks there would reason enough for alarm.I guess this mayor Khan would like to minimize these incidents because the perpetrators are of his faith.
AnneM says
God Bless President Trump!
Robert Lippincott says
YES, YES, YES.
Joseph says
Why pick on Reza Aslan? Every commentator in the liberal main-stream media thinks exactly the same way… as does everybody in the Democrat Party and all the people who support their views. The overwhelming majority of academics in the liberal/progressive K through 12 and university systems are Reza Aslan clones too. One example: I was watching MSNBC about a half hour ago and that one-time presidential hopeful, Howard Dean, was spewing the same disrespectfully seditious crap as Reza Aslan does. It’s all the very same brainless garbage. Look around you, because this is how advanced societies rot-out and collapse: first from within and then from without via all the many violent parasites that are always out there… waiting… like vultures. It’s the diversity of contagious diseases.
gravenimage says
I take your point, but Aslan is a Muslim specifically working for an enemy state in order to further the cause of our destruction. Pointing this out is not “picking on him”.
Joseph says
Your point is well stated. I agree with you on this…
gravenimage says
Thank you, Joseph.
Jayell says
When you haven’t got an argument but you like the sound of your own voice and you haven’t got the sense to shut up, you resort to insults. If you’re a bit uncouth and you haven’t got the brain to think of something clever or witty for your verbal barbs, you resort to vulgar expletives like a brainless yob with a verbal aerosol can. And if you’re even more stupid, you then sit back and imagine that everyone thinks you’re ‘big’. Which seems to be Reza Aslan’s style.
gravenimage says
Reza Aslan: Trump “piece of s**t” for calling for travel ban in wake of London jihad attacks
……………………..
So you are an “embarrassment to humankind” for trying to prevent more people from being attacked and murdered? Aslan reveals how truly repulsive–and truly Islamic–he is.
Of course, the idea is that Trump should not have “politicized” things in the wake of a “tragedy”–but how many actually buy that?
Georg says
What more do you expect from someone who idolizes a man who’d throw him off a building?
Ace-of-Clubs says
I checked Aslan’s Facebook page and he was getting massive criticism for his POS remark about Donald Trump. Good to see. Wish they could just parachute him into some Muslim hell-hole and see how he likes life.
gravenimage says
Good.
Stan Lee says
It’s too bad that Reza Asslan is here, rather than in Russia. After his remark about Trump, if Trump had been instead Putin, Asslan’s life-span would have only a few days for him to make “final” arrangements.
Joeyn says
Islam is grossly evil and is the problem. Many Muslims if not most are victims because they have been possessed by this evil from a very young age. Thus we cannot hate Muslims but only Islam. We need to help these Muslims be released from this evil by speaking the truth about Islam. This is called tough love. By being politically correct we are actually being unloving to these Muslims. We are also being unloving to these Muslims by continuing to allow them to victimize other Muslims and non-Muslims. President Trump’s immigration ban is a very wise and loving thing to do although I think it should be expanded to include other Islamic countries as well. I really hope other political leaders wake up and follow President Trump’s example.
billybob says
Reza Aslan is a piece of shit.
Catherine says
President Trump’s direct and logical message is that of a leader concerned for the safety of his nation’s citizens in the wake of yet another jihadist atrocity.
As for Reza Aslan’s obscene overreaction, who cares what he thinks?
p says
Resla Ass-lan is Anti American murder hungry hater of western culture, with the inbred IQ of about 60.
He can run for London mayor, or be head of North Korea. He make Jeffrey Dahmer look like a boy scout.
As an extremest he needs to be thrown out of the west..
He is American as Attila the Hun, and I would watch my car keys around that one, and put a burkha on my dog.
He wins the pork sandwich award
R Cole says
Reza Aslan a cannibal!!
Probably fit in well with the hierarchy of the Democrats. As Podesta explains it – it’s better to be the one with the fork.
They’re supremacists.