President Trump has taken London Mayor Sadiq Khan to task for his grossly insensitive statement about the London jihadist attack:
“At least 7 dead and 48 wounded in terror attack,” the president wrote on his personal Twitter account, “and Mayor of London says there is ‘no reason to be alarmed!’”
Only a “leader” with either an unsound mind or an unsavory agenda could utter such bizarre words following a gruesome jihad rampage (within two weeks of the one Manchester) that began with the mowing down of innocent civilians and continued with a 12-inch blade “knife frenzy.” All the while, the jihadis shouted “this is for Allah.”
Khan’s words start to look more sinister than obtuse when one considers his own jihadist connections. He was reported by the UK’s Spectator to have known links to “extremists”:
Some of these associations date back to his time as a director of Liberty and a human rights lawyer – trying to get the UK to lift its ban on the American Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, who has described Jews as ‘blood-suckers’ and called Hitler ‘a very great man, and speaking at the same conference as Sajeel Abu Ibrahim, a member of the now proscribed Islamist organisation that trained the 7/7 bomber Mohammad Sidique Khan.
It doesn’t stop there:
in 2004 he appeared on a platform with five Islamic extremists at a conference in London organised by Al-Aqsa, a group that has published works by the notorious Holocaust denier Paul Eisen….In the same year, Khan was the chair of the Muslim Council of Britain’s legal affairs committee and was involved in defending the Muslim scholar Dr Yusuf Al-Qaradawi.
Qaradawi is no “moderate.” As reported by Jihad Watch in February:
Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, the most renowned and prominent Muslim cleric in the world, has stated: “The Muslim jurists are unanimous that apostates must be punished, yet they differ as to determining the kind of punishment to be inflicted upon them. The majority of them, including the four main schools of jurisprudence (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi’i, and Hanbali) as well as the other four schools of jurisprudence (the four Shiite schools of Az-Zaidiyyah, Al-Ithna-‘ashriyyah, Al-Ja’fariyyah, and Az-Zaheriyyah) agree that apostates must be executed.”
In September, Khan stated that it was necessary for Westerners to be careful not to insult Muslims and to affirm that Muslims can hold Western values, otherwise they would join jihad groups. In other words, Khan was warning non-Muslims to beware of insulting Muslims, otherwise they would kill you.
Also, it did not matter that jihad attacks in Britain tripled in five years: Khan boasted in March that he planned on bringing in 1,500,000 more migrants.
Khan should have never become Mayor of London in the first place, given his unsavory background. His plan to bring 1,500,000 more migrants to London will further expose London to jihad attacks and infiltration.
The West is in a self-induced crisis and needs to end the practice of putting political correctness before the wellbeing of its own citizens.
“Donald Trump berates London mayor over response to terror attacks”, by Martin Pengelley, Guardian, June 4, 2017:
Donald Trump has criticised the mayor of London, hours after seven people were killed and 48 injured in a terror attack in the centre of the city.
“At least 7 dead and 48 wounded in terror attack,” the president wrote on his personal Twitter account, “and Mayor of London says there is ‘no reason to be alarmed!’”
In response, a spokesman for Sadiq Khan said the mayor had “more important things to do than respond to Donald Trump’s ill-informed tweet that deliberately takes out of context his remarks”.
Khan commented on the attacks in a statement overnight and in a television interview earlier on Sunday. In the interview, he said there was “no reason to be alarmed” by an increased and armed police presence in the city that day.
In his statement on Saturday night, issued as the London Bridge attack unfolded, Khan said: “Metropolitan police are responding to the horrific terrorist attack at London Bridge and Borough Market.” He added: “My thoughts are with everyone affected, and I’d like to thank the brave men and women of our emergency services who were first on the scene and will be working throughout the night.
“This was a deliberate and cowardly attack on innocent Londoners and visitors to our city enjoying their Saturday night,” he said. “I condemn it in the strongest possible terms. There is no justification whatsoever for such barbaric acts.”
In the television interview on Sunday morning, Khan said the UK general election, scheduled for Thursday, should go ahead as planned. He added: “There aren’t words to describe the grief and anger that our city will be facing today. I’m appalled and furious that these cowardly terrorists would deliberately target innocent Londoners.
“There can be no justification for the acts of these terrorists and I am quite clear that we will never let them win.
“My message to Londoners and visitors to our great city is to be calm and vigilant today. You will see an increased police presence today, including armed officers and uniformed officers. There is no reason to be alarmed by this. We are the safest global city in the world. You saw last night as a consequence of our planning, our preparation, the rehearsals that take place, the swift response from the emergency services tackling the terrorists and also helping the injured.”
After Trump’s tweet, a spokesperson for Khan said: “The mayor is busy working with the police, emergency services and the government to coordinate the response to this horrific and cowardly terrorist attack and provide leadership and reassurance to Londoners and visitors to our city.
“He has more important things to do than respond to Donald Trump’s ill-informed tweet that deliberately takes out of context his remarks urging Londoners not to be alarmed when they saw more police – including armed officers – on the streets.”…
Halal Bacon says
Are Khans dues up to date with the muslim brotherhood?
Marc says
https://youtu.be/MmWJMuC_Jx8
Fred says
As a student of history I recall that the British people have in the past had a number
of uprising when their freedoms and rights were being violated. Most of the time it
was against a ruler who was violating them. Its time that they recall a little of their
history and do something about it. Anglo Saxons are generally slow to anger but can
be swift and ruthless when pushed too far. Its time for the British people to explain
in the most forceful manner just what they expect of the people living on their island
Malcolm (South Afric) says
In a tweet, Mr. Trump seized on comments by London Mayor Sadiq Khan, who said Britons should not be alarmed to see more police in the streets after three men drove a van into pedestrians on London Bridge before stabbing others nearby.
“At least 7 dead and 48 wounded in terror attack and Mayor of London says there is ‘no reason to be alarmed!’” Mr. Trump tweeted.
Good on you President Trump
BLC says
President Trump is right about Sadiq Khan. Khan is a radical sympathizer/supporter.
Wakeup says
After the Manchester bombing Trump said the only effective thing out of all the comments. He said “they are losers remember that” rather deflating they won’t like that. Maybe the world is starting to wake from its Stockholm syndrome, I hope.
gee says
They are not losers. They are very religious Islamofascists and the rest of the cult holds them in very high regard.
The only solution is to keep them isolated in their own countries where they cannot get to innocent people. Then they only harm each other
Shmooviyet says
Khan ducks the inconvenient fact that London NEEDS all the preparation planning and rehearsal he’s boasting of.
How reassured Londoners must feel to hear that their city is the safest in the world– after the mass butchering has begun.
He might just as well say it “could have been worse”.
Dacritic says
Khan ducks the more inconvenient fact that London needs to ban Islam… and therefore him.
Mac-101 says
YA, git used to the “New Normal”. I’d rather NOT!
common sense says
Khans words against the attacks are hot air, he is clealry a political jihad war pig. So glad Trump questioned is agenda and mental health. 1A right.
Carolyne says
I think that Khan, as mayor of London, has just a part of greater London as his domain. I don’t know how or why he was elected, but it was really dumb. In England, is the Mayor of a city allowed to set foreign policy for the country to bring in more foreigners? Isn’t that the province of the national government?
Fusilli Jerry says
This Londoner finds Sadiq Khan’s rise a cause for concern, not least because of the ease with which his campaign people spun the issue of his having shared platforms with jihadists, into a false but vote-winning accusation of racism against his main opponent in the 2016 London mayoral election. However the indispensable work that Jihadwatch does is undermined by its unquestioning advocacy of all things Trump.
Which has more meaning: Trump talking tough on Islam when he was courting votes, or his actions once he got those votes? Saudi Arabia, with its total ban on churches and all other places of non-Muslim worship, and its death penalty for apostasy, lends home-of-Mecca legitimacy to the notion that infidels must be eliminated. This is the same Saudi Arabia that Trump is desperate to further arm to the teeth.
Kay says
I don’t think JW has unquestioning advocacy of all things Trump; certain posters do but not the website.
lebel says
The tweet was taken out of context but it does not matter because what matters to jwatchers is who said it not what is said
Khan is a Muslim and therefore evil, end of story. No matter what he says it will be evil
Khan: “No need to be alarmed by the police presence”
jwatch: “you terrorist!”
Khan: “kill all ISIS”
jwatch: “Taqqiya!”
To be fair, this is no just jwatch, go to extremist muslim boards (or any extremist sites) and you’ll find a similar attitude.
StacyGirl says
Hardly. The tweet was dead on if you don’t mind the pun. The presence of police is an issue for the Muslims crawling all over Britain. No cause for alarm says mayor muzzle as the guns are safely stored. After the first bridge massacre, any prudent mayor would have armed guards on every bridge and no sane person in Britain would walk across even then. Who will you be voting for?
Anne Smith says
Teresa May ( who is becoming ever more batty on a daily basis) has spoken to support Khan and to say that he is doing a good job.
We have no-one to represent us to vote for in this coming election.
gravenimage says
Repulsive apologist for Muslim savagery lebel wrote:
The tweet was taken out of context but it does not matter because what matters to jwatchers is who said it not what is said
Khan is a Muslim and therefore evil, end of story. No matter what he says it will be evil
……………………………
What absolute claptrap. The appalling Sadiq Khan has regularly minimized Jihad terror attacks. He dismissively said that Jihad terror attacks are “part and parcel of living in a big city”–never mind that this was hardly true before Muslims began flooding into Britain.
More:
Khan: “No need to be alarmed by the police presence”
jwatch: “you terrorist!”
Khan: “kill all ISIS”
jwatch: “Taqqiya!”
……………………………
What crap–when did he ever say any such thing as “kill all ISIS”?
“The bus driver’s son who became London’s first Muslim mayor: How ex-human rights lawyer Sadiq Khan has been dogged by links to extremists…”
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3575614/Introducing-London-s-Muslim-mayor-Sadiq-Khan-bus-driver-s-son-human-rights-lawyer-dogged-links-extremists-claims-moderate-loves-manicures-wooed-wife-McDonald-s.html
In fact, Khan has stood with Sulaiman Ghani even though cleric ‘supports ISIS’–how does that square with lebel’s implication that Khan has been calling for all members of ISIS to be killed?
Or perhaps lebel is just sneering that ‘even if’ Khan were actually staunchly against Jihad terror that no one here would believe him, just because he is Muslim?
Try again, creep.
More:
To be fair, this is no (sic) just jwatch, go to extremist muslim boards (or any extremist sites) and you’ll find a similar attitude.
……………………………
How many times have we heard this grotesque implication–that if we dare point out the savagery of Islam that we are no better than murderous Jihadists.
That would be like saying that Winston Churchill was just like Hitler for noting that Fascists are violent, and that the Nazis genocidally hate Jews.
p says
how is infidels dying a problem for any muslim? It is Ramadan you know. They simply are expressing islam in simple terms. You get extra points for killing during the blood fest of ramadam.
Sadist Khan is no different than any jihader, and is offended you don’t understand conquering England is the goal. Of course, who will pay their welfare? Without it, they would certainly integrate, go to work, or go home.
If Trudeau was there the victims could be arrested for islamophobia. See?
http://pamelageller.com/2017/04/landlord-must-pay-muslim-couple-12000-failing-accommodate-religious-practices.html/
\
Carolyne says
I expect that the bouncer at the bar who was throwing things at the Jihadist will be arrested any day now for “Islamophobia.” That’s how it works in Western Europe.
gee says
Too bad he never does say anything remotely close to that. Instead he constantly justifies ISIS and all other Islamofascist terrorists
Stan Lee says
Perhaps Londoners who voted for Khan lacked the foresight of possible jihad attacks. Khan also is very evasive concerning his belief in Islam, but in the final analysis he is still a worshipful Muslim who will not defend all Londoners against Muslim terrorism. He would point to Muslim “extremism” which can happen with most Muslims after they’re sufficiently motivated against non-Muslims. Their koran directs jihad, and especially during their “high holiday” Ramadan.
Obviously, it is simple for British politicians to speak with forked tongues when their sole interests are winning elections, and it is even more obvious that (in this case) Londoners were maneuvered to vote for Khan, which was also a vote for “political correctness”, the fallacy that causes any people rigidly observing “political correctness” to elect individuals incapable of protecting the entire electorate. When “push comes to “shove”, Mayor Khan is always going to take his side with Islam, and anyone critical of that can take it or leave it.
The British appear to favor Socialists (who could be masquerading Communists), and haven’t even a choice to select a true Conservative. They are stuck between one leftist or another, and more than likely would not support anyone except moderate leftists to extreme leftists.
They may have missed the fact that they have discovered who their enemy is, and that enemy is themselves..
StacyGirl says
Britain is hard to pity. Their keystone cops, their hag leader in a headscarf, and their muzzle London mayor. I wonder how much target practice their cops take after shooting that American in the head. Oh yes, guns are bad and must be locked away. They are indeed their own enemy. America has elected Trump and we still have our guns. Britain is gone.
p says
LOndon muslims voted him in. Where is the problem?
Carolyne says
There used to be a cartoon swamp creature who would say, “We have met the enemy and it is us.” Appropriate for the Brits.
shosh7154 says
From the mayor’s point of view, all is well since only the infidels are dying, no reason for alarm
Katnis says
Maybe police and armed military should wear t-shirts that day, “Don’t be alarmed.” Maybe that would provide some comfort. Throw in some billboards and splashy bus signage and all will be well.
People killing citizens randomly… No reason to be concerned!
alex smythe says
dont worry be happy
Tjhawk says
Khan is trying to spin the context to make it seem that he was saying people should not be alarmed at the increased police presence and not that the attack itself didn’t deserve some alarm. Even if that’s the case, it’s still an idiotic thing to say after an attack like this. Of course people should be alarmed at the increased police presence!! Everyone knows why there is a heavy police presence. It seems to me like the context doesn’t make his statement any less offensive.
His BS is deep and wide. Forget the hip boots, the people of London had better get a boat. When Sadiq Khan says ‘stay calm’ ‘don’t be alarmed’ it reminds me of when Atta told the passengers of the plane to ‘stay calm and stay in your seats, and nobody will get hurt’.
underbed cat says
Islam is Islam, which seeds terror with it’s doctrine, ie sura’s. Khan is pretending and protecting the doctrine…so he must know it. Very clever but not factual that Islam is radicalized by terrorist who carry out the commands.
Tjhawk says
Oh, and let’s not forget his little gem after the Westminster attack. ‘ This is part and parcel of living in a major city’ What a sphincter muscle!
gravenimage says
Yes–just repulsive.
Antony says
Hi. Libtard here. Appalled, devastated Londoner too.
Can you please try and tone down the comments? I came to this site because I want a solution to the disastrous problems of islamist terrorism as we all do, surely, and I want to get out of me left wing bubble. Could it possibly be conceivable that if we started to work together, left and right, on what’s we can all agree on, which is a surprising amount, we would get far more done? Our leaders in the UK, the US etc benefit so much from the incredibly fractured debate and we all suffer! Thore in charge piss us all off because we all, by our binary camps, screaming at each other let them gel aways with it. Surely we all want the same thing? Liberty, gainful employment, food in our bellies, good education for our kids, dignity in old age etc.
Please try and see the consequences of comments above, such as that they well respected mayor of London is a “jihad war pig” for example.
Can we try and start speaking to each other, both left and right?
We are not going to solve our problems with “love”. There IS a problem with islamism.
Equally, how can one debate with people who advocate a Muslim holocaust, killing literally millions as someone suggested earlier to me!
Am I nuts? Would love to talk with you guys more about this?
Tjhawk says
Hi Antony, I’m an unapologetic liberal, with liberty very much at the core of my beliefs. Freedom of speech and conscience are foundational building blocks. Life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, you know, all the good stuff. Another thing true liberals can’t abide is submission to some unreasonable authority. There is NOTHING that screams SUBMISSION like islam. I will be forever resistant to islam because there is not a single thing about it that is compatible with my values. I’m confident that any liberal who makes even the tiniest effort to learn will come to the same conclusion Don’t call yourself a libtard if your values are sound.
When posters here make comments about libtards and the like, I suspect they really mean Lefttards. Now a post modern, morally relative, leftist is something that I am most definitely NOT. I still find it possible to discriminate against bad ideas, whereas leftists think any discrimination is oppressive and evil.
There are some rough edges here, but if you toughen up and keep your mind focused on learning about and weakening islam, then you can find a home here. Stay with it, there are some brilliant minds here, even if you might not hold every political stance in common.
Tjhawk says
Antony says:
Equally, how can one debate with people who advocate a Muslim holocaust, killing literally millions as someone suggested earlier to me!
Antony, nobody who is here regularly advocates a muslim holocaust, and if they do, they aren’t here long. Now, there are people who wish for the disappearance of the ideology that inspires death and conquest, but that’s not the same as being a proponent of a muslim holocaust. Destruction of this violent ideology could be done on a battlefield of ideas if only the government and media would allow our intellectual warriors to meet there.
Kepha says
Antony:
I’ll taker the opportunity to extend condolences to London and the UK as a whole, where I have visited and for which I have fond thoughts. My prayers are with you and other British people in this time of grief.
Uncle Kepha
gravenimage says
Antony wrote:
Can you please try and tone down the comments?
………………………….
You believe that we are speaking too critically of savage Jihadists slaughtering innocent Londoners? I have to say that I am unapologetic for condemning this bloody barbarism.
More:
Please try and see the consequences of comments above, such as that they well respected mayor of London is a “jihad war pig” for example.
………………………….
Anthony, are you aware of the Jihad terror links of this “well respected” Muslim?
“The bus driver’s son who became London’s first Muslim mayor: How ex-human rights lawyer Sadiq Khan has been dogged by links to extremists…”
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3575614/Introducing-London-s-Muslim-mayor-Sadiq-Khan-bus-driver-s-son-human-rights-lawyer-dogged-links-extremists-claims-moderate-loves-manicures-wooed-wife-McDonald-s.html
The Daily Mail is a pretty mainstream newspaper.
Khan also tried to get the UK to lift its ban on the American Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, who has described Jews as ‘blood-suckers’ and called Hitler ‘a very great man’–he also spoke at the same conference as Sajeel Abu Ibrahim, a member of the now proscribed Islamist organisation that trained the 7/7 bomber Mohammad Sidique Khan.
Khan was the chair of the Muslim Council of Britain’s legal affairs committee and was involved in defending the Muslim scholar Dr Yusuf Al-Qaradawi, whom the MCB described as ‘a voice of reason and understanding’. At the time, the MCB issued a press release blaming the ‘smear campaign’ against Qaradawi on ‘the Zionist lobby’. Khan himself gave evidence to the House of Commons Home Affairs Select Committee in which he said ‘there is a consensus among Islamic scholars that Mr Al-Qaradawi is not the extremist that he is painted as being’.
But this Muslim shcolar, among other things, is the author of a book called “The Lawful and Prohibited in Islam” in which he justifies wife beating and discusses whether homosexuals should be killed. Even more notoriously, he condones ‘martyrdom operations’–that is, Jihad suicide attacks just like the one at London Bridge.
More:
Equally, how can one debate with people who advocate a Muslim holocaust, killing literally millions as someone suggested earlier to me!
………………………….
Well, this is just calumny–the idea that is one is opposed to Muslims slaughtering us, that we mush–somehow–be in favor of genocide. *Ugh*.
Carolyne says
Antony, coming to an internet website in hopes of solving the problem of terrorist attacks is a rather unrealistic expectation. The entity you should be going to is your own government which is allowing barbarians to stream into your country, kill, rob, rape and be given free housing, food, etc. for their trouble.
If I had the power to settle the problem by the mere fact of being a member of this forum, I would deport all Jihadists and ban the entry of any more Muslims into my country. But, alas, I do not have that power nor does this forum.
And I agree that Sadiq Khan is a Jihadist pig.
Ace-of-Clubs says
What’s that old Chinese proverb about the fish rotting from the head down ? Grim times for non-Muslim Londoners when you have a Muslim mayor. He will practice taqiyya of course and always put Muslim interests first. Less than 48 per cent of Londoners now are white British. In the two boroughs with the highest numbers of Muslims, there are lots of health problems due to in-breeding ie cousins marrying cousins. Jihadist flags are sometimes seen flying from buildings and Sharia law is being covertly practised. What a hell-hole that part of London must be.
commonsense says
Khan repeatedly refers to the terrorists’ attacks as targeting people who are innocent. But he as a Muslim likely knows that the attackers did not consider their victims to be innocent, as they, as Britons, had already been invited to Islam – repeatedly – through social media, Muslim advocacy organizations as well as individual Muslims such as Anjem Choudhury who routinely receive traditional types of media coverage, and, in many cases, Muslim neighbors and shopkeepers. The Muslim presence in Britain is so ubiquitous that a great many Muslims must believe that their sheer numbers and the power of their message, whether taking the forms of explicit da’wa or being largely indirect, through terrorism, could hardly have escaped notice of indigenous, non-Muslim Britons. And these indigenous Britons, having rejected, or merely ignored, this endlessly repeated invitation to Islam, have therefore incurred the just and vengeful wrath of the minions of Allah and Muhammed, and must face the consequences. It is they, the Britons, the stiff-necked, obstinate worshipers of the cross, along with all the other groups guilty of ignoring the call to Islam, who are the true aggressors, as they oppose and cause to slow the inexorable advance of the House of Islam. Furthermore, these aggressors are committing offenses because they hold attitudes and engage in activities which Muslims find repellent, such as living under a legal system based upon man-made laws as opposed to the Shari’a, enjoying music, socializing in mixed company, eating pork, drinking alcohol, and so forth – such behavior cannot be permitted, in accordance with the Muslim precept of Al-wara w’al-bara.
StacyGirl says
Khan knows exactly why these attacks happen especially during Ramadan. He will be at 10 Downing St sooner than later. Let’s all stand in the shape of a heart and wait for the next van to cross the bridge.
Carolyne says
Don’t forget the tea lights, teddy bears and bouquets.
gravenimage says
All true, commonsense–no Infidel is considered innocent.
OT–commonsense, another poster said that you were in the San Francisco Bay Area–is this correct? Davegreybeard and I are going to be meeting again in Oakland soon, and would love to see you. If you return to this thread, please let me know if you would be interested. 🙂
commonsense says
gravenimage:
No, I’m nowhere near the West Coast. Meeting you and Davegreybeard would have been nice, however. Please stay safe.
gravenimage says
Thanks for the reply, commonsense. It would have nice to meet you, as well. 🙂
Walter Sieruk says
The Muslim mayor of London said “Those terrorist attacks on London were performed by men [the terrorists] who were trying to justly their action by the religion I belong to …their ideology is a perversion [ of Islam ] and has no place in Islam” The Muslin mayor, Sadiq Khan, of the capital city of England further said that he is “Outraged at those who try to hide their evil with Islam.” He could be in a genuine mental state of denial about the violent and deadly of many of the parts of Islam or by contrast he might know and is attempting to cover up the truth about the violent essence of Islam. Likewise, the prime minster of England, Theresa May, when make public statements about those violent and vicious terrorist attacks on London Bridge and nearby Borough Market. She has declared this heinous religious terror attack as the outcome of “an ideology that is a perversion of Islam,” That statement shows that she didn’t do her homework. For those jihadist Muslims were putting in the practice the instruction of real, actual, non-watered down hard core Islam. As the Quran in, for example, Surah 9:123 instructs “O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you…” Also Surah 9:111 teaches “The believers fight in Allah’s Cause, they slay and are slain, they kill and are killed…” The whole foundation for the ideology of Islamic terrorism is the theology of the Quran. As seen in those two, just sited, verses from the Quran and other verses well, such as, Surah 4:89. 5:33 47:4. Teresa May also denounced “Extremism.” This type of “Extremism” is based on the Quran.
Richie says
Does Sadiq Khan’s loyalties lie with the people of London, or with Islam? Which one will he be first to defend? Im wondering if he;s a sleeper agent for Jihad, feeding intel to Isis
Wolverine says
The latter is correct.
Khan is an adept jihadist,
He has Londoners eating out of the palm of his hand.
carol says
Here is a video of Khan’s brother-in-law (’til 2011 anyway). In the last minute or so he almost cries when he rants against Westerners and their awful slave trading (see for yourself!):
Meet London Mayor Sadiq Khan’s Ex Brother-In-Law Makbool Javaid
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ziZo3xycoZg
gravenimage says
Thanks for posting the link, Carol.
Sam says
Trump is the only world leader who is telling (not %100) the truth about Islam and the whole world is against him including the scum bag mayor of London.
Sick of liberals and Muslims.
carol says
Mayor Khan probably secretly delights at Trump’s slight skew on his comment as it distracts from the actual bridge attack and gives him an excuse to try to chase Trump away.
He knows Trump will make hay of ALL the RamadamaDINGDONGfestivities during his visit and will say what has to be said and thus give rationality and support to poor squelched Brits.
in reply to Anthony I wish the candidate for anything and everything was not chitchat but this guy:
Paul Weston Calls For Total Ban Of Islam
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmgFnVXL_24
carol says
The problem for the common citizen (aside from dysfunctional leaders and globalists) is probably WHERE do you strike? HOW do you gather forces? and WHOM do you strike among this loose, widespread amalgam of “religious” fruitloops with a grudge?
Men like Trump and Watson seem to recognize the answer – you forget any SUICIDAL POLITICAL CORRECTNESS and you evict your enemy – you unashamedly go for the jugular while you can still wield a knife. There is nothing so worthwhile as Western civilization and it is now entrusted to YOU. Realistic self-protection and isolationism in the face of a sly, slippery (oily) enemy may for now be the only tangible tool and TARGET that we have e.g. bombing Al Azhar probably isn’t a plan.
The enemy obviously has a deep appreciation of how PC sensibilities act as their vital shield against common sense – which is why they and their “sensitive” minions preach it nonstop.
Isabellathecrusader says
What’s all the fuss? Sadiq Khan told us we would have to get used to more and more terror attacks in major cities around the world. We’ve continued to place flowers and Teddy bears on the sites where these attacks have taken place. Sadiq Khan is obviously the supremacist overlord of infidels in London and he is acting as Muslim overlords have acted for centuries. Which part don’t we get?
Wolverine says
Precisely.
Kahn is pure evil genius.
London it appears is completely screwed.
If anyone doubted it before the evidence is mounting.
The staph infection they once had is now a metastaticising tumor.
John says
It’s all very well for him to advise us not to be alarmed. His name is Khan. He is a Muslim. He is not a member of their target group !
Lioness says
He is not worried. But British infidels should be afraid, very afraid.
Brenda Buruma says
What’s with the surname ‘Khan?’ I think the gold star father that spoke at the Democratic National Convention was named Khan. I couldn’t stand listening to him run down President Trump, then presidential candidate Trump. Khan was literally yelling, telling Trump to read the US constitution. He even held up a copy of it.
Later, When Trump was asked what he thought of Khan’s ranting at convention Trump asked why his wife (Khan’s) didn’t speak. (She was standing beside him wearing her hijab, not saying a word). I can’t remember how Trump worded the question but I know he was insinuating that was she not allowed because she was a Muslim woman? Khan said his wife was too emotional to speak as there was a big picture of their son close by at the time. But I saw him and his wife interviewed later on during the week and again, she said nothing and he did all the talking and there was no picture this time.
I love how un politically correct Trump is. I was thinking the same thing at the time, as to why the wife said nothing.
gravenimage says
“Khan” means ruler, and is a common Mohammedan name.
abad says
That is why I support Trump; he tells it like it is, the truth hurts oh and yes, neither can the liberal elite nor the Muslims handle the truth
Enough said.
gravenimage says
Trump berates London’s Muslim mayor over response to jihad attacks in London
……………………..
Good for the American president! This vile Muslim mayor is making light of his coreligionists slaughtering the very people this thug was elected to protect. *Ugh*.
Joe says
As muslim the mayor of Londonistan is part of their problem. It is beyond my understanding why the citizens would elect a muslim as mayor. But him saying they had to live with the terror and other ridiculous things would be a reason to step down.
Lioness says
Just wait for him to run for PM in 4 years, and probably win.
Wolverine says
Khan is vile human.
First digging into Trump, when that’s the last thing you would think he would be doing.
Make NO MISTAKE Khan is practicing jihad 101.
Notice his speech today in London.
He slowly states:
“We. wont. Let. you.WIN”
In my estimation the SLOW deliberate manner in which he specifically states the phrase is such that you almost forget what he’s talking about until he say WIN!
and makes it a point to end the phase with the word”WIN” wherein he puts strong emphasis on the last word. “WIN”
Find a video and listen to it Robert.
Tell me what you think.
Wolverine says
Is khan surreptitiously talking in code to the worldwide jihadist movement?
carol says
Yup, I think he’s saying “Despite your actions we will carry on as tho nuttin hoppen…so there!!”
ibrahim itace muhammed says
look at mad devil trump a brain damaged baboon referring to the energetic mayor of London to be talking out of sense for assuring Londoners that measures are being taken to ensure their safety and as such not be alarmed with the presence of heavy security agents.This remark by mad trump shows that he is irresponsible bigoted muslim hater.His only concern is how
to commit armed robbery to fill American Treasury with ill gotten wealths as he decently intimidated stupid Saudi monarchs to surrender more one hundred billion dollars to evil United states to be supplied with obsolete weapons to fight Iran and wicked Americans
i
.
ibrahim itace muhammed says
look at mad devil trump a brain damaged baboon referring to the energetic mayor of London to be talking out of sense for assuring Londoners that measures are being taken to ensure their safety and as such not be alarmed with the presence of heavy security agents.This remark by mad trump shows that he is irresponsible bigoted muslim hater.His only concern is how
to commit armed robbery to fill American Treasury with ill gotten wealths as he decently intimidated stupid Saudi monarchs to surrender more one hundred billion dollars to evil United states to be supplied with obsolete weapons to fight Iran and wicked Americans
i
.
gravenimage says
The appalling ibrahim itace muhammed wrote:
look (sic) at mad devil trump a brain damaged baboon referring to the energetic mayor of London to be talking out of sense for assuring Londoners that measures are being taken to ensure their safety and as such not be alarmed with the presence of heavy security agents.This remark by mad trump (sic) shows that he is irresponsible bigoted muslim (sic) hater.
………………………………..
How *dare* Trump want to protect Londoners from being slaughtered by ibrahim itace muhammed’s pious coreligionists? What a “bigot”…
Also note: being “energetic” is not a positive thing if it spouting apologia for Jihad terrorists, as Khan has done many times.
More:
His only concern is how
to commit armed robbery to fill American Treasury with ill gotten wealths (sic) as he decently intimidated stupid Saudi monarchs to surrender more one hundred billion dollars to evil United states (sic) to be supplied with obsolete weapons to fight Iran and wicked Americans
………………………………..
Wait–I thought Donald Trump’s only concern was bigotry against muslims?
Really, muhammed should make up his mind…
ibrahim itace muhammed says
Gravenimage,so you are happy with that day light armed robbery by your evil and fraudulent United.states on saudi Arabia ?At any rate judeochristian values mean theft and deceits to misapproriate properties of other.nations without blame, because they are automatically saved according to
pauline law of grace,which is a lie inspired by the Satan.All economic growths being recorded by the united state have been achieved through fraudulent economic dealings with weak nations.where any leader of such weak nations dares resist the fraudulent economic
dealings,CIA and MoSSAd agents will be despatched to topple him or support rebellion to destablise him.The emergence of
China with faire economic dealings is now threatening this wicked hegemony of the United States
.
Carolyne says
I don’t know how Gravenimage feels about it, but yes, I am happy with armed robbery–especially of Muslims, since that is their specialty. Turn about is fair play.
You are a funny man, Ibrahim.
gravenimage says
The witless ibrahim itace muhammed wrote:
Gravenimage,so (sic) you are happy with that day light armed robbery by your evil and fraudulent United.states (sic) on saudi (sic) Arabia ?
……………………………….
Actually, I believe that we should have minimal diplomatic and economic dealings with Dar-al-Islam, and that selling Muslims weaponry is especially foolish–all the more so considering the Saudis role in 9/11.
I think our best model was the US policy of isolating the appalling Islamic Republic of Iran from 1979 until Obama broke this with his suicidal nuclear deal.
That being said, the idea that free trade is “robbery” shows just how incapable of rational thought pious Muslims are–the Saudis were not forced to buy weapons from us–it is something they wanted to do.
The fact that ibrahim itace muhammed has no understanding of free trade explains why so many Muslim nations have such hopeless economies.
More:
At any rate judeochristian (sic) values mean theft and deceits to misapproriate (sic) properties of other.nations (sic) without blame, because they are automatically saved according to
pauline law of grace,which (sic) is a lie inspired by the Satan.
……………………………….
What ludicrous projection–it is Muslims who believe that they have the rights to everyone else’s property, and that Infidels have no rights. The “Prophet” himself was a caravan raider, a kidnapper, a pirate, and a slaver. Jesus, needless to say, was none of these things.
I won’t even get into muhammed’s misunderstanding of the Christian concept of grace.
More:
All economic growths being recorded by the united (sic) state (sic) have been achieved through fraudulent economic dealings with weak nations.where (sic) any leader of such weak nations dares resist the fraudulent economic
dealings,CIA (sic) and MoSSAd (sic) agents will be despatched (sic) to topple him or support rebellion to destablise (sic) him.The (sic) emergence of
China with faire Sic) economic dealings is now threatening this wicked hegemony of the United States
……………………………….
What a load of tripe. No nation is forced to trade with the United States. Those that do so trade with us because it is *mutually* economically advantageous for them to do so.
No surprise that someone who adheres to a creed that disdains productive labor and lauds brigandage would be incapable of grasping this simple concept.
Alexander says
Applying Takiya, huh? The Mayor is a lier and so r u…
ibrahim itace muhammed says
applauded him for that
stephen burgess says
KHAN IS ONLY IN THE JOB BECAUSE WE PUT PEOPLE LIKE HIM ABOVE OUR OWN IN A LOT OF JOBS,HE IS A REVOLTING PIECE OF SCUM,HE IS LIKE A LOT OF THE SCUM HE REPRESENTS,A LOT WORSE TO COME IF WE DONT START DEALING WITH KNOWN SCUM,AND STOP IMPORTING MORE OF THE SAME BRITISH HATEING FILTH.
Alexander says
There u have it: a Trojan Horse. A muslim Mayor who says it is not a drama that infidels loose their lives, who wants to bring more of those jihadis into the country, who has ties to terrorist groups and so on. Some say Britain is finished. I slowly come to believe that it is true..
Valkyrie Ziege says
; Typical Muhammadan = (c)an’t (u)nderstand (n)ormal (t)houghts. As Obama will be America’s last black president, because he didn’t end all the riots, this Muhammadan Mayor will be the last Muhammadan mayor.
gravenimage says
I would have no problem with another Black president, as long as it was someone like Allen West.
The problem with Obama was not that he was Black–which is only half true, in any case–but that he was a socialist enabler of Jihad.
Lorensacho says
What a stupid move by Trump. He should have offered support and sympathy not condemnation.
Carolyne says
He offered support (Anything they need) and sympathy. He asked God to bless them. He also is trying to protect America. Try to keep up, Lorensacho.
gravenimage says
Trump should have offered support and sympathy of London’s appalling, terrorist-linked Muslim mayor? *Whatever for?*
Ace-of-Clubs says
Muslim mayors and councillors in a number of British towns colluded with Pakistani-origin men who were grooming and raping young white girls in their thousands. This was all happening from the late 1980s onwards but police and social services chose to turn a blind eye because they did not want to be termed “racist” or Islamophobic. Thousands of white girls, and a smaller number of Sikh girls too, were sacrificed on the altar of political correctness. Four girls lost their lives. Only a fraction of the men responsible have been jailed, and none of the corrupt officials have been punished. Muslim mayors and councillors were in on this, so-called official, always Labour party. It is a national disgrace which is minutely examined in a book called Easy Meat by Peter McCloughlin. There has been little coverage in the media even now. This is what Muslims do when they get into power. The Muslim population in Britain is over 3 million now, which might not sound much, but it doubles every ten years so you can see that we are doomed in the long run, unless we start fighting back now.
shosh7154 says
As a deplorable in a basket, I am happy to say that Americans have concealed carry licenses and now many of them can openly carry. Just a friendly reminder to allah and his happy attendants.