• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Facebook says Muslim’s rape threat against ex-Muslim doesn’t violate its “community standards”

Jul 15, 2017 10:29 am By Robert Spencer

Maryam Namazie is a Marxist, which means that her opposition to Islam is just a matter of wanting to exchange one form of violent authoritarianism for another. She is a vicious Jew-hater who has spread “Palestinian” jihad propaganda. Namazie is also a liar, as she claims here that Pamela Geller and I have accused her of practicing taqiyya, and she has published an entire report defaming and libeling us in numerous ways.

None of this, of course, means that she should be raped, or that rape threats against her should go unnoticed. Facebook’s refusal to act on this is yet another example of its determination to implement Sharia blasphemy norms and silence all criticism of Islam, as Facebook’s Vice President recently assured Pakistani authorities that it would do. Jihad Watch’s referrals from Facebook dropped 90% in mid-February and never recovered: reporting about the jihad threat apparently does violate Facebook’s “community standards.”

And now Facebook is even tolerating jihadist threats against ex-Muslims.

What makes this outrageous is that Facebook controls so much of the public discourse today. As long as its influence remains so large, it has to be opened up to legal challenge.

“Facebook Says Rape Threat Against Ex-Muslim Activist Doesn’t Violate Standards,” by David G. McAfee, Patheos, July 14, 2017 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

Maryam Namazie, a political activist who frequently criticizes Islamism, received a graphic rape threat from a violent Muslim. Unfortunately, according to Facebook, the message didn’t violate any of their “specific community standards.”

I have received a lot of hate mail over the years, but this is something extraordinary. His threat is clear and specific… and disturbing. So, be warned.

This is violent and graphic, so keep that in mind.

Namazie shared some screenshots from the conversation on Twitter to protest Facebook’s censorship policies. She pointed out that pages get shut down regularly because they criticize Islam, yet the company seems not to care about graphic threats. This is something I have experienced, as well, so I’m happy people are finally paying attention to this double standard….

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Featured, Internet jihad Tagged With: Facebook, Maryam Namazie


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Peter Buckley says

    Jul 15, 2017 at 10:45 am

    Whatever your own opinions about Namazie’s politics, the fact is, for the UK at least, she represents the first generation of former muslims, breaking out even in countries which were thought to be virtually 100% muslim:

    https://www.facebook.com/Exmuslims.ma

    She and her colleagues are helping to break the back of Islam, and should be supported.

    • gravenimage says

      Jul 15, 2017 at 8:46 pm

      No one should receive violent threats like this. I am not a personal fan of Namazie’s politics, but that is not an issue here.

    • BC says

      Jul 16, 2017 at 4:33 am

      Completely agree I have long supported her and her organisation. Mr Spencer and Pamela G would do well to meet with her and discuss their differences, whatever they may be. They should regard her as ally and fellow fighter against Islamism

      • Peter Buckley says

        Jul 16, 2017 at 5:16 am

        I believe her equivalent in the US is Sarah Haider. I have no idea what her politics are, and they don’t really interest me. Her mere existence is a “good thing”.

        The point is, these people, more than anyone else, are breaking the back of Islam. Probably the best speaker on Islam in the UK is Douglas Murray. And he recognised this a long time ago:

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nKijc-oARKU

      • Robert Spencer says

        Jul 16, 2017 at 4:19 pm

        You have things the wrong way around. She attacked us gratuitously. If she wants to talk, it’s easy to find me. But let’s just say I’m not waiting by the phone.

        • Peter Clemerson says

          Jul 16, 2017 at 7:25 pm

          Like BC, I support her financially because what she is doing is so much more important than her views of capitalism and Israel, with which I disagree. It is sad to see the courageous opponents of Islam such as yourselves at each others’ throats.

  2. Santa Voorhees says

    Jul 15, 2017 at 11:14 am

    Fakebook’s ummah standards suck. Period.

  3. utis says

    Jul 15, 2017 at 12:25 pm

    With such a finely tuned set of “standards,” Facebook needs to make them explicit. If criticizing passages in the Koran or the Umdat al-Salik violates Facebook standards, yet a vicious, sick verbal threat on an individual does not, Facebook needs to describe its “standards” in detail.
    And if Zuckerberg is almost literally kowtowing to Pakistan, won’t this eventually lead to banning women from Facebook? If sharias rule the day, even cyberspace sex-mixing will be haram.

  4. Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY) says

    Jul 15, 2017 at 1:47 pm

    I am unfamiliar with Facebook. I would be grateful if someone would please explain the following:

    [1] “Jihad Watch’s referrals from Facebook dropped 90% in mid-February”: What is a referral from Facebook?

    [2] Facebook has “community standards”. Where can the text of these community standards be found?

    [3] What is this community? How does one become a member? Is this a democratic community, whose standards are determined by majority vote? Are community members ever expelled, and if so, how?

    • Brit says

      Jul 15, 2017 at 9:16 pm

      Facebook is one of the most , if not the most dominant photo/video/chat sharing sites. I am not a member but I have looked at some of the pages. Anyone can become a member. I dont know how their community standards work but Im almost certain its not democratic. I magine a referral from facebook is when someone who is currently on facebook clicks a link to jihad watch.

  5. Verity Pink says

    Jul 15, 2017 at 3:22 pm

    The post should be banned on the grounds of plain ordinary indecency, regardless of which faith community is or is not thought to be represented here. And Facebook should inform the Police, and give them any assistance needed in tracing IP addresses.

  6. gravenimage says

    Jul 15, 2017 at 8:43 pm

    Facebook says Muslim’s rape threat against ex-Muslim doesn’t violate its “community standards”
    ………………………

    What “community” is Facebook using–a Muslim No Go Zone?

    So threatening to rape apostates is fine, but don’t dare say anything true about the savagery of Islam–Facebook does not allow that.

  7. Flavius Claudius Iulianus says

    Jul 15, 2017 at 10:11 pm

    Facebook. Why would anyone sign up to a company that takes your personal info in order to create content to sell advertizing?

  8. mortimer says

    Jul 15, 2017 at 10:24 pm

    Maryam Namazie should not be subjected to these salacious death threats. FACEBOOK has a moral obligation to help the authorities locate anyone who makes DEATH THREATS… Such threats may be carried out.

    Maryam Namazie has the right to lie and others have the right to expose her falsehoods. It’s a matter of time before she discredits herself. She will eventually discredit herself and then she will be dismissed by all honest people.

    If you are in the public eye, the spotlight can be harsh, but truthfulness is the main weapon of everyone in debate.

    • gravenimage says

      Jul 15, 2017 at 10:28 pm

      Spot on, Mortimer.

  9. Chad Miller says

    Jul 15, 2017 at 10:38 pm

    This is typical of Facebook’s “community standards”.
    I’ve dealt with them myself more than once and it’s a disturbing trend, but then what isn’t it when it comes to Leftist fruitcakes?

  10. Andy says

    Jul 15, 2017 at 10:39 pm

    From what I heard of facebook I’m glad I didn’t sign up to get it now.

    No facebook for this guy. never had it, never will. I don’t want to be part of something that tries to censor the truth. Let people see and hear for themself all points of an argument and let them decide for themself.

    STOP ALL CENSORSHIP Especially MOSLEM CENSORSHIP!

    Ex-Muslim group slams Facebook censorship of its views

    http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/digital/exmuslim-group-slams-facebook-censorship-of-its-views/news-story/b88b893bde33de97f31f336e90b87180

  11. somehistory says

    Jul 15, 2017 at 10:41 pm

    What standards? They don’t have any, They just have decided that anything they like is acceptable and anything they don’t like, doesn’t meet what they don’t have…standards.

    I didn’t read all of what she said the son of demons said to her, but what little I did, reads like violent porn.

    Never booked my face….never want to. The site has shown me over and over, my standards are way too high to lower them there.

  12. Lydia says

    Jul 16, 2017 at 12:27 am

    They are showing themselves for the lowlifes that they are.
    Does any of that sound ‘holy’ to anyone?
    It is vile, filthy, dirty, profane, and violent, threatening someone with a sexual assault of rape.
    And the low lifes on facebook back it up because they are all birds of a feather now.

  13. Sarah says

    Jul 16, 2017 at 3:04 am

    It’s always a bloody Mohammed, isn’t it? Given how they breed like flies in their miserable world, there are an awful lot of boys being born and apparently, an awful lot of them are all called Mohammed.

    It must get very confusing for their calenders. They must have at least three ‘Remember its Mohammed’s birthday!’ reminder note’s on their calender each week. How exhausting. I’d hate to see giving gifts at Eid. It’d be a right confusing mess with 50+ presents scattered about, all tagged to ‘Mohammed’.

    You’d have to treat it like some kind of Islamic Secret Santa. (Mysterious Mohammed? That just makes it more confusing) Generic gifts for all the Mohammed’s to share. That’s easy enough. You could just wrap up 50 shiny new machetes and stick a Mohammed label on them all. What a great way to cut down on time spent, shopping for presents!

    Still, you’d save a fortune on clothing labels and such. There’s got to be a label company out there that sells Mohammed labels in bulk for these giant Muslim families with all their Mohammed’s spread amongst them. Wouldn’t want to take the wrong person’s jacket home after prayers, or grab the wrong Tupperware container after a lounge-room sermon session with your local JIhadi-preaching Imam.

    I wonder what they do in Madrassas? Just create a Mohammed class and whack all the boys named Mohammed into one room and put the other boys in another? Otherwise, you’d have 60% of the classroom responding to you, whenever you announced ‘Mohammed!’

    I’m frankly amazed that the trash underclass in the Muslim world hasn’t started riffing for uniqueness when naming their boys and using Demmahom or Mo-Hamm-Erd or Mow-Humm-Ahrd as ‘edgy’ alternatives. You know, to separate the special wheat from the chaff. The Lebanese should get right on Demmahom, that’s right up their alley, so classy and all. They can drape little Demmahom in solid gold chains and hand him a pistol and a Lambo. Just bringing along the next generation!

    It’d sure be an easy to way for any Western government, should any of them grow a pair and decide to expel all Muslims – to find them all. Just check the welfare rolls for any Mohammed’s. Then follow the gravy train to find the numerous wives attached to each and the unending number of kids they’ve bred.

    Since they all intermarry and enclave within their own communities in our nations – you could unravel every single one of them and flush them out of their hidey holes just by tracking all the Mohammed’s in the system. God knows just rounding up every person named Mohammed will take care of around 60% of all Muslim males in any given nation.

    Yes, I’m bored today. Its Sunday and its freezing here in Melbourne. And frankly, I have no sympathy for any idiot who thinks Facebook is supposed to provide them with a safe space in their free platform.

    What do these people who use Facebook think? That Zuckerberg (an Anti-Christ figure if I’ve ever seen one before) dreamt up Facebook and offered it to the world, for free, out of the kindness of his little shriveled black heart?

    Get off social media full stop. There are numerous ways to spread the word around the world if you have a message that you need to get out, that do not include Facebook and Twitter. And for Pete’s sake, stop giving Zuckerberg all this free information about you – what do YOU think he’s going to do with it? Create unicorns and rainbows for everyone? Come on.

    Social Media as a platform is a quagmire comprised of the very worst filth of human nature. Just stay the hell away from it. Its ludicrous to look to Facebook to act as some kind of moral guardian over us all (which is truly, the last thing we really need, if they were to ever gain that much control over our culture’s).

    • Verity Pink says

      Jul 16, 2017 at 7:13 pm

      Reminds me of a joke I read a while back. Apparently there was a lady living in a run-down area who was interviewed by a reporter following the birth of her latest son.
      Reporter “What are you calling him?”
      Interviewee: “Wayne.”
      Reporter “Is that a family name?”
      Interviewee: “Yes, I’ve named all my boys Wayne. That way, when I want to call them in from playing out, I can just stand on the step and shout “Wayne!” and they all come in.
      Reporter: “What about when you only want one of your sons?”
      Interviewee: “Ah, well then I’d use his surname.”

  14. Tom says

    Jul 16, 2017 at 10:46 am

    I have been shut down on facebook simply for criticising the main stream media and their hypocracy regarding their lack of coverage of the genocide of christians in the middle east.

    Facebook has no problem finding reasons in their “community standards” to shut down free speech but will not shut down a direct threat to the safety of a woman.

    This shows just how pathetic facebook really is when a threat to someones safety is less serious than mere criticism of the main stream media.

  15. staffsgt7 says

    Jul 16, 2017 at 11:30 am

    My guess is that Zuckerberg is a head banger and is only trying to be a good widdle moslem with his blasphemy laws on facebook, and his care less attitude about threats to apostates.

  16. Felix Quigley says

    Jul 16, 2017 at 3:27 pm

    There are major problems with how Robert Spencer treats these issues.

    As for the smears of Pamela Geller regarding Obama, and of Pamela and me regarding defending Serbian war criminals, Pamela Geller ably answers them here, and I have more on the Serbs and related matters here. For dishonest people and jihad-supporters, opposition to the jihad in the Balkans and skepticism about some of the charges made of Serbian war crimes equals support for Serbian war crimes. That is absurd and baseless.
    https://www.jihadwatch.org/2011/08/maryam-namazie-antisemitic-supporter-of-jihad-against-israel-claims-to-be-anti-jihad-lies-about-spen

    Serbia was attacked on all fronts including by Islamic Jihadists. It was entitled to defence by all means which it decided to use.

    So what war crimes were the Serbs guilty of as Robert Spencer intimates?

  17. Felix Quigley says

    Jul 16, 2017 at 3:48 pm

    Robert Spencer writes in defence of the right to fight Jihad and Islam:

    “None of this, of course, means that she should be raped, or that rape threats against her should go unnoticed. Facebook’s refusal to act on this is yet another example of its determination to implement Sharia blasphemy norms and silence all criticism of Islam, as Facebook’s Vice President recently assured Pakistani authorities that it would do. Jihad Watch’s referrals from Facebook dropped 90% in mid-February and never recovered: reporting about the jihad threat apparently does violate Facebook’s “community standards.”

    And now Facebook is even tolerating jihadist threats against ex-Muslims.

    What makes this outrageous is that Facebook controls so much of the public discourse today. As long as its influence remains so large, it has to be opened up to legal challenge.”

    In describing what is happening Spencer is right. The massive facebook organization is organizing Sharia Law. Absolutely totally right.

    But what to do? This is the critical question, just as critical as seeing the danger. Spencer does see the danger and given due credit for that. But his answer is at least inadequate and possibly dangerous.

    I think that Spencer leads the jihad movement into certain defeat if he takes that route, and only that route of legal cases against the likes of Facebook, which he intimates. I am not of course opposed to the taking of legal action to defend the rights of free speech. Not at all. I would support each and every such action and fight it through the bourgeois courts.

    But in the way that the bourgeois court system has been able to do way with its own system against Trump is a severe warning – that the way of Spencer as suggested above will lead the anti-Jihadist movement to certain defeat.

    If the capitalist (bourgeois) system is proved to be rotten from the top to bottom as the war conducted against Trump shows then the capitalist system as a whole is rotten from top to bottom and must be removed, as painlessly as possible, but removed nevertheless.

    This is the REAL meaning of Facebook promoting Sharia Law.

    It poses socialist revolution not toying around with law cases. You see the war against Trump has proved that the whole system including the law courts is corrup tto the core. Only revolution is the answer.

  18. Krazy Kafir says

    Jul 17, 2017 at 4:30 pm

    Quisling dhimmis are not interested in protecting those who fight Islam.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • gravenimage on Iranian top dogs approve bill to end UN nuclear inspections, increase enrichment
  • OLD GUY on Biden vows to surrender to Iran, then negotiate
  • Peter Clemerson on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • Meena on India: Police make first arrest for ‘love jihad’ under new law
  • gravenimage on Uighur leader: ‘We’re actually quite worried’ about what Biden might let China get away with

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.