“Google’s first page results for searches of terms such as ‘jihad’, ‘shariah’ and ‘taqiyya’ now return mostly reputable explanations of the Islamic concepts. Taqiyya, which describes the circumstances under which a Muslim can conceal their belief in the face of persecution, is the sole term to feature a questionable website on the first page of results.”
“Reputable” according to whom? “Questionable” according to whom? Google is bowing to pressure from Muslim such as Omar Suleiman without considering whether those who are demanding that the search results be skewed in a particular direction might have an ulterior motive. Could it be that those who are pressuring Google want to conceal certain truths about Islam that they would prefer that non-Muslims not know?
This is a real possibility, but of course Google executives would have to study Islam themselves in order to determine whether or not these Muslims who are pressuring them are misleading them, and that’s not going to happen. Still, they could have done a bit more due diligence, and made some efforts to determine whether those being tarred as “hate groups” really deserved the label, whether the Southern Poverty Law Center was really a reliable and objective arbiter of which groups were and weren’t “hate groups,” and whether the information that Google was suppressing was really inaccurate. Instead, Google seems to have swallowed uncritically everything Omar Suleiman and the others said.
Suleiman, however, still isn’t satisfied: “One leading activist in favor of Google modifying its results told Anadolu Agency he noticed the updated search results and thanked the company for its efforts but said ‘much still needs to be done.'” He claimed that Google has a responsibility to “combat ‘hate-filled Islamophobia’ similar to how they work to suppress extremist propaganda from groups like Daesh and al-Qaeda.”
This should have made Google executives stop and think. The Islamic State (Daesh) and al-Qaeda slaughter people gleefully and call openly for more mass murders. There is no firm evidence that anyone has ever been killed by a “hate-filled Islamophobe,” and the claim that Hamas-linked CAIR and the SPLC make in this article, that this supposed “Islamophobic” rhetoric has led to a rise in hate crimes against Muslims, is supported by not a scintilla of evidence. Suleiman is equating critical words with murderous deeds, and Google should have realized at that point that he had an agenda and wasn’t being honest.
“Suleiman said Google should differentiate between ‘criticism of Islam and hate-filled Islamophobia’, emphasizing the religion should not be infringed upon.”
That’s not clear. He apparently is saying that there is acceptable criticism of Islam that is not “hate-filled Islamophobia,” but if that is so, then the religion can be “infringed upon,” at least by this legitimate criticism, no? Or if the claim that Islam must not be “infringed upon” means that it cannot be criticized, why is that so of Islam but not any other religion?
Suleiman says: “I don’t think Google has a responsibility to portray Muslims positively. I think Google has a responsibility to weed out fear-mongering and hate groups but I don’t want Google to silence critique of Islam, or critique of Muslims.”
The problem with this is that neither Suleiman, nor Hamas-linked CAIR, nor anyone else who has ever said that there was a distinction between legitimate criticism of Islam and “hate-filled Islamophobia” has ever identified anyone he thinks is a legitimate critic of Islam who is not “Islamophobic.” Over 16 books now, as well as thousands of articles and over 45,000 blog posts, I have attempted to present a reasonable, documented, fair and accurate criticism of Islam and explanation of the jihad doctrine. Nevertheless, I’ve been tarred as a purveyor of “hate-filled Islamophobia” by groups and individuals that have never given my work a fair hearing, but have read it only to search of gotcha!-quotes they could wrench away from their obvious benign meaning in order to claim I was saying something hateful. And this isn’t just me — this happens to anyone and everyone who dares to utter a critical word about Islam or jihad, wherever they are on the political spectrum.
This experience, reinforced countless times over a decade and a half, makes me extremely skeptical when Omar Suleiman says that he doesn’t want Google to silence critique of Islam. If he could produce some critique of Islam that he approved of, my skepticism might lessen. But he won’t, and can’t. It seems much more likely that he pressured Google to skew its results so as to deep-six criticism of Islam, but knowing that he couldn’t tell them that he was trying to bring Google into line with Sharia blasphemy laws forbidding criticism of Islam, he told them instead that he wasn’t against criticism of Islam as such, but only against “hate-filled Islamophobia.”
Mr. Suleiman, if you and your colleagues hadn’t spent years tarring rational criticism of Islam that was accurate and presented in good faith as “hate-filled Islamophobia,” I might have believed you. But as one of your primary victims, I don’t.
I discuss the Islamic supremacist initiative to compel the West to accept Sharia blasphemy laws under the guise of stamping out “hate speech,” an initiative that is now galloping forward and achieving immense success, in my new book The Complete Infidel’s Guide to Free Speech (and Its Enemies).
“US Muslim groups welcome changes to Google results,” by Michael Hernandez, Anadolu Agency, July 26, 2017:
Queries about Islam and Muslims on the world’s largest search engine have been updated amid public pressure to tamp down alleged disinformation from hate groups.
However, activists who have worked to bring about the changes say more work remains.
In the past, users on Google seeking information about the religion or its adherents would be presented prominently with what many criticized as propaganda from hate groups.
That has recently changed.
Google’s first page results for searches of terms such as “jihad”, “shariah” and “taqiyya” now return mostly reputable explanations of the Islamic concepts. Taqiyya, which describes the circumstances under which a Muslim can conceal their belief in the face of persecution, is the sole term to feature a questionable website on the first page of results.
Google did not confirm to Anadolu Agency the changes but said it is constantly updating its algorithms.
The search giant referred the agency to a recent blog post in which it said it was working to push back on what it called “offensive or clearly misleading content”.
“To help prevent the spread of such content for this subset of queries, we’ve improved our evaluation methods and made algorithmic updates to surface more authoritative content,” it said.
Combatting Islamophobia
One leading activist in favor of Google modifying its results told Anadolu Agency he noticed the updated search results and thanked the company for its efforts but said “much still needs to be done”.
Imam Omar Suleiman, who has been at the forefront of efforts to combat misleading information about his faith on the web, argued that Google and companies like it have a responsibility to combat “hate-filled Islamophobia” similar to how they work to suppress extremist propaganda from groups like Daesh and al-Qaeda.
Suleiman said Google should differentiate between “criticism of Islam and hate-filled Islamophobia”, emphasizing the religion should not be infringed upon.
“Google does not need to silence criticism of Islam and honest discussions about Islam, but heavily funded hate groups that are able to work the SEOs to get their websites showing up on the first, second page – I think that’s deeply problematic,” the popular imam said, referring to search engine optimization — the way in which websites are able to improve their placement in search engine results.
The task of sorting out legitimate criticism or debate about Islam from misleading information will not be easy, particularly in societies that value freedom of speech — a fact Suleiman, who is the founder and president of the Yaqeen Institute for Islamic Research, acknowledged.
Google told Anadolu Agency it does not seek to remove content from its platform simply because it is unsavory or unpopular, but does its best to prevent hate speech from appearing.
One way it is working to improve on the effort is by providing users with a mechanism in autofill suggestions that would allow users to alert the company when an offensive term appears.
Amid a nationwide increase in hate crimes targeting Muslims, the effort to combat misinformation is more imperative than ever, Muslim group said.
Hate crimes against Muslims
The Council on American-Islamic Relations, the U.S.’s largest Muslim advocacy group, said it tracked a 584 percent increase in anti-Muslim hate crimes from 2014 to 2016.
The group is not the only one to find such numbers. The Southern Poverty Law Center tracks hate incidents and groups in the U.S. and said it found hate groups increasing in number for the second consecutive year in 2016, fueled largely by a near-tripling of anti-Muslim groups.
“The growth has been accompanied by a rash of crimes targeting Muslims,” the center said in its annual report.
Information people receive from a variety of sources — television, radio and the Internet — no doubt plays a role in fomenting hatred among some of those who perpetrate attacks but could also be used to stop them.
“We are seeing a rise in hate crimes towards Muslims, and there is a direct connection between this demonization of Islam and Muslims and the hate crimes that are being perpetuated against Muslims in the United States,” Suleiman said.
Still, he maintained that such voices should not be censored but “should not be featured prominently as authoritative voices.”
Suleiman added: “I don’t think Google has a responsibility to portray Muslims positively. I think Google has a responsibility to weed out fear-mongering and hate groups but I don’t want Google to silence critique of Islam, or critique of Muslims…
Yes, you do.
Dan says
Well I use DuckDuckGo for my searches and as of 5 minutes ago, the top 5 results,(Didn’t check any further) are still bring up Mr. Spencer and Ms. Geller’s versions of taqiyya.
I’ve NEVER used google except as a last, last last resort, and in the past six or seven years, that’s been MAYBE a half dozen times.
Can’t even remember if I used, or was happy, with the results.
Skywatcher247 says
I also use duckduckgo, and have for a few years. I’ve had no problems with it. It’s the only search engine I use.
Joe says
As of one minute ago on reading this article, I’m THROUGH WITH GOOGLE!
It’s DuckDuckGo for me from now on! I’m boycotting google search from now on!
John Forbes says
HOW on earth is this happening & WHY ??? The WEST seems to have given in already to this ideology ???
SEEMS like all countries are in for a ROUGH RIDE very soon. HITCHENS warned repeatedly that there would be BIG issues with ISLAM in the future & IMPLORED all to NOT BOW to ISLAM or FREE SPEECH would go as well as many other democratic rights & Choices .
WAKING the PUBLIC is now the BIG ISSUE & cutting through APATHY & the LIES of the MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD will be the challenge
carpediadem says
i just Googled jihadwatch and the first page featured all proper refs except for a loonwatch one and a quora question about Robert.
In general, I don’t think censorship contributes to the customer experience.
RichardL says
I love DuckDuckGo because it is not censored AND it gives better results. Search for yourself and compare results.
Jihad gives you one website suggestion: JW
Maria smith says
You are aware DuckDuckgo is Google right !!!???
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
Technology at work. Maybe it’s time for Clock Boy to emerge as the technical genius his dad is selling him as. Or, maybe it’s time for a major Moslem leader to vault up in American politics, and begin laying the formal groundwork for Sharia in this country. And Canada.
Pml says
Like if ex prez obummer weren’t?
Amy Smithe says
Are you mad? None of them should be anywhere in our government, but they are! They ARE laying groundwork for the future when ‘muslims rule the world ‘ and make us all into their surfs or are dead because we will not! Stand up NOW and stop them before they get a foot hold, for once that happens
it will be daily blood inthe streets and a land that looks like theirs over there now!
Dan says
Went a bit further. Here wast 8th listing on DuckDuck
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6F4wBeshTsw
Flavius Claudius Iulianus says
LOL! I love Doctor Dave; he’s an awesome source of information and entertainment!!
So from now on when I hear this music I will be shouting out: “Taqiyya!!”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MDD21ZJF3mI
jack grandville says
Methinks there are great many sources that claim ‘hate mongering,’ and how it is unacceptable. I must admit that prior to the influx of Muslims into both Canada and the U.S. that such accusations have grown exponentially. Perhaps, if there were less calling for death to people who indicate they do not want to conform to the Muslim ‘way,’ by the ‘leaders’ of the Muslim communities, there would be less to complain about. Notwithstanding the record of death and destruction caused by said Muslims around the world daily, accompanied by brutality just for the sake of brutality, their comments might have a touch of sincerity which, by its consistency, gives rise to a large degree of trust in their motives. I feel that, like guests to one’s home, immigrants who, for whatever reason do not wish to conform to the standards of the host, are free to leave at any time. That would solve the problems — real or imagined.
mohamonator says
A modest proposal: Although we can probably all agree that what Google is doing IS censorship, the term “censorship” is now so overused that lots of folks tune it out and don’t pay attention. Kind of the “boy who cried wolf” problem. I propose the term “search laundering”, by analogy with money laundering.
End search laundering–boycott Google!
Alien Republican says
What you search is not what you get. Isn’t that the end of any search engine ?
mortimer says
THERE IS NO ‘ACCEPTABLE’ CRITIQUE OF ISLAM IN SHARIA LAW:
From Islamic Commentaries:
-“Insulting the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) is one of the worst of forbidden actions… whether done seriously or in jest. The one who does that is to be EXECUTED even if he repents and whether he is a Muslim or a kaafir.” – Ruling on one who insults the Prophet, Shaykh al Munajid, Islam Q&A, Fatwa No. 22809
– “The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) sometimes chose to forgive those who had insulted him, and sometimes he ordered that they should be executed, if that served a greater purpose. But NOW HIS FORGIVENESS IS IMPOSSIBLE because he is dead, so the EXECUTION of the one who INSULTS him remains the right of Allaah, His Messenger and the believers, and the one who deserves to be executed cannot be let off, so the punishment MUST be carried out.” – Al-Saarim al-Maslool, 2/438
-as-Suyuti writes: “(If they break their oaths…) This ayah (K. 9:11-12) is used as a proof by those who say that if a dhimmi attacks Islam (VERBALLY) or the Qur’an or MENTIONS the Prophet in a bad manner, HE IS KILLED, whether he has broken a treaty or not. Those who say that his repentance is accepted use as a proof, ‘hopefully they will stop.’”
Debi Brand says
I expect this too will likely be “Censored”:
( OpposingIslam Tillerson’s Folly (“The Bliss of a Martyr”)
Tillerson’s Folly (“The Bliss of a Martyr”)
dlbrand July 26, 2017OpposingIslam
By Debi Brand
Read the essay at http://www.debibrand.org/tillersons-folly-bliss-martyr/
Johan Elzinga says
For a very brief moment I didn’t believe you. A few seconds, almost eternity, because I know that you don’t spread lies, dear mr Spencer, of course you were right. I realised that even before I tried google with the word jihad. Increadible. Google getting in the way of what jihad means to everyone of us. I’m thinking about linking a few secondary search engines to my web pages. And, of course, jihadwatch is a site that I consult every day now. From the Netherlands. That used to be a country that cared about free speech.
John A. Marre says
A person could easily be led to think that there is a conspiracy to bring Muslims in to the USA, and to give them power over the people who don’t marry 9 year-olds, rape infidels, burn their cars, and cut their heads off.
Google, Facebook, Twitter all are using their computing power to the takeover.
JF says
I wish there was a discussion here by some tech savvy individuals as to how to combat this. Running off to another search engine does not solve anything if most people still use Google.
What if a group of Jihad Watch readers used the new “report inappropriate search terms” to report pro-Islamic sites?
For instance, typing “Muslim” brings up the Yasir Qadhi affiliated magazine, “Muslim Matters” on the Google search results. Why don’t a dozen of us here object to that result. He has called non-Muslims “filthy” and said he is entitled to make them slaves.
I would participate. I will do it now in fact.
carpediadem says
i just Googled jihadwatch and the first page featured all proper refs except for a loonwatch one and a quora question about Robert.
In general, I don’t think censorship contributes to the customer experience.
Joe says
I don’t see the censorship. My search of Google bring the expected results. For example, “Jihad”, brings up a couple of dictionary definitions and then this website, “Jihad Watch”. “Sharia Law” is similar.
Google pioneered backlinks as a search engine, and then they have been messing with an increasing number of other criteria for years. For example, mobile friendly sites are suppose to be more likely to show.
In the last several years, Google has used artificial intelligence which is actually an optimization of coefficients on an infinite series. They don’t specify which infinite series they use. With this type of technology, they can’t predict what will show, and that has been causing them problems.
Of course, they can “hard code” a specific search. For example, they could block “Jihad Watch” from the result by writing code that specifically does that. But, it doesn’t seem that they have done that.
AzB says
yeah i can’t see much changes.
I think the hate sites which are removed are probably the ones by kind of neonazi groups consisting of nothing but pictures of muslims butchering people
with some kind of immediate + urgent call to arms for patriots
cos that’s gonna happen aswell, just as much as the ISIL side to things will.
Feeds highlighting collections of news stories about migration related crimes and qu’ran text analysis i doubt and definitely hope will not be removed any time now or in future.
AzB says
I do personally think the role of traditional fiqh in restraining the types of excesses we see from some of the radical and splinter groups is downplayed on this site; the degree to which “mercy” has been implemented down the ages is not mentioned (i think the ottoman empire went 500 years and only stoned one recorded person for example).
So i find some of what is attributed to “islam” is more like “theoretical or very retrograde islam” –
or splinter or radical or extreme orthodox (saudi) – etc. The more i read the more SURE i am that the saudi variant they have been propogandizing is responsible for really upgrading the degree of “kuffar hatred” compared to anything traditional. I think they’ve got a lot to answer for actually.
But that’s what the comments section is for to talk about and argue it.
AzB says
Yeah that’s a good idea.
Absolutely no reason why such characters should get a free pass to proffer their bullshit claims on page 1 of google.
Hate censorship goes two ways muslims.
mohamonator says
Google is following the Golden Rule–you know “Whoever has the gold–makes the rules”. They don’t want their site to be blocked in Turkey, or Pakistan, or the Gulf states, and they really, really, REALLY don’t want to be blocked in India. They are probably already blocked in Iran, but so is the rest of the Western Internet. Pissing off a few thousand truth seekers means nothing to them. NOTHING. Sorry.
Tony says
There is nothing good from the koran. It is a comic book.
john says
Hate speech is a totalitarian scam, to shut down honest debate. Canada has this.
Google should be sued for breech of the first amendment. Corporations are individual entities just like every person that is held to account by the laws in the constitution
Amy Smithe says
GOOGLE NEEDS TO BE BOYCOTTED and all of us stop using them for anything! Make them sit up and hear what we have to say to them! They are ignorant if they are not standing for America!, just like the Democrats are not! The lefters want America to be a socialist state, which fits right into what Islam wants, but what the stupid Dems do not get is once the muslims are in enough numbers they will behead Democrats too, just like all the rest that do not bow down to their idiotic life style! And they wonder why most of the world says they are out of their minds! Muslims really believe that they are something special and how they live the ONLY way!!! Well God, the REAL one, will have something to say about that and He will NOT let this insanity continue. Especially if man is that dumb and lost after all this time of the truth being out there! Those that have turned their backs on faith and God are asking for destruction on America! Faith is to honor, the truth is the truth and the Bible is the Word of God. Jesus, His Son and our Savior died for all sin, for all man, for all time, period. There has to be one truth folks….there has to be right and there is wrong! There are rules to follow because mankind has failed miserably at being what God created us to be, but He loves us anyway and forgives us! All He asks is
for us all to believe and seek Him! We can no longer just keep making things up as we go along and wonder why things are in such a mess world wide!! And who is in the middle of all the evil; muslims and those that are taking us all into the end times fight for truth!…you know, like Soros, the Obama’s, the Clinton’s, the Dems, the One World Order folks of the UN the gays, the lefters and many others………..
SK says
This Suleman guy, man.
Is this guy uncomfortable with the idea of suppressing critics? Kashif Chaudhry(, one of those Ahmadi guys) pays the same lip service to the idea of “legitimate criticism”, but I doubt it means anything in practice.
Speaking the truth about their beliefs in love is not wrong.
Also, that shooting in Quebec might be an example they might use for “evidence that anyone has ever been killed by a “hate-filled Islamophobe,” “
Flavius Claudius Iulianus says
I think google is ripe for going the way of Alta Vista.
Barry Sommer says
If you have to use Google to lookup any word such as jihad or sharia, just change it slightly. I tried “the sharia law” and got both the benign (Huffpo) and the truthful (jihadwatch, etc). Same thing with “lesser jihad” and “kitman and taqiyya”. We can do a run-around if needed, but DuckDuckGo is pretty good.
Strong Aingel says
The MAIN issue here is why do muh need all this global protection? They declare a war on the West, and magically arrange to pour millions of their brothers and sisters into every square mile of every non muh Nation. Meanwhile Christians and others are being unceremoniously murdered in muh States and the hamas Authority labelled Palestine. Google and others, by persistently pandering to muh whim, which is in fact tactical politics, are in effect acting Treacherously toward the rest of us. A few millionaire computer sluts are assisting the Politically Correct narrative we all know is ludicrously skewed in favour of our very demise, and apparent replacement with inbred vermin. This as the news bleats out we are becoming impotent, or don;t know our gender or some other such bs. Jihad Watching is no longer viable. Nor is it reasonable to put your browsing experience over and above the future well being of your generations in the making. Fuqaha Google .. and the rest of the rich boys who have little concern about their Soul let alone ours, busy as they are on Playboy Arabs yachts in all those nice locations actual muh let their hair down and forget the boring Ummah shit they live off.
Singh the Sikh says
Google needs to read this to knock some sense into it:
http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/i-cannot-recall-a-time-when-muslims-were-suspected-en-masse-of-being-unpatriotic-naseeruddin-shah/story-L4xVpcVEluGV3fRmoEsSvN.html
gravenimage says
Google bows to Muslim pressure, changes search results to conceal criticism of Islam and jihad
…………………
Just repulsive.
AzB says
Search “jihad” in Google.
You’re still in the first page of results lol.
Most of the links still refer to the fighting part of the definition.
AzB says
The search result from islamicsupremecouncil website is still kind of misleading. It’s not that far off but all of these sources should be more specific about exactly how and when the military part kicks in.
Most definitely it is a lie to say , as that site does say, “jihad is not a violent concept”.
its a warrior code concept. So therefore it is violent. It depends on the conditions to establish a legitimate jihad as to whether that is a type of violent concept which we would put into line with other similar codes to fight in other situations (like in self-defense or declaring a war against an enemy aggressor state).
it would be more helpful to understanding the various factions – salafism, radicalism, islamism, and mainstream law – if such definitions and websites would explain exactly how each group is giving the various traditions, or possibly distorting them, in pursuing jihad of various kinds.
So in other words the first page of results isn’t very helpful still because it fails to explain what is going on in the world right now. Its approximately true to say that the warrior code would limit the majority of situations of initiating violence, but not all, a couple are worth knowing and being honest about, and some are adaptations going against the grain of the mainstream, in some cases, due to quite complex chains of philosophical reasoning and justification that until recently did not exist at all.
Jihad is a big subject. “It’s not violent” is way too simplistic.
Green infidel says
Well, my first page google.com search results for Taqiyya include The Religion of Peace, Raymond Ibrahim and the Gatestone Institute… not your typical PC sources 😉 but then maybe results also vary by user?
SuchindranathAiyerS says
What are the alternate search engines? Google probably accepted a hefty bribe in Petro Dollars.
Robert John Bennett says
Well, I suppose we should be grateful that Google hasn’t eliminated Jihad Watch completely. When I do search, it comes up on the second page, after all of the “explanations” of what “jihad” “really” means.
Still, I’ll try using DuckDuckGo from now on for my web searches.
Jacqueleen says
Google indeed is spying on our emails and blocking those that google disagrees with…GOOGLE NEEDS TO GO BANKRUPT. I have had more emails “undeliverable” until I change the subject line and many more that I did not receive….THANKS TO THE LIBERAL GOONS AT GOOGLE. BTW, the same thing happens with the other servers…..They think it is their job to police the Internet.
Amy Smithe says
Muslims have no right to tell anyone anything…this is America and we can condemn anything that is evil wrong against our country and against what WE believe. How ignorant can a group of people be to do what they do…this is not what our nation is about and it is time that EVERYONE stand up against these brainless evil satanic people; muslims and shut them up! They either become one with us or get out of OUR country!!…Just who do they think they are to tell us how to be in OUR nation! They can take those turbans and shove them deep into their mouths because we do not want to hear a thing from them unless they speak of truth, freedom, justice and the right of everyone to say as they chose to and live according to the Constitution and the laws of America. If muslims can’t, they need to get out and we will gladly slam the door as they do….or send them otherwise, if that is what they chose for keeping it up and making us take action against them! What an ignorant and stupid bunch of excesses for humans. It is like they have been hiding under a rock all this time and have no idea how the rest of the world lives and believes…it sure is not how they do! They are wrong and we need to put them in their place. If they are the way they are then they ALL need to remove themselves to the Middle East and stay there because they are at odds with all the rest of humanity…no one wants to live as they do unless they are as ignorant and evil as the rest of them are. Muslims are not stopping because no one is standing up to them and telling them we do NOT HAVE TO LISTEN TO THEM or listen to their crap and we do not believe like they do, which is of satan. We believe as Christians do or those of us that have any sense do that is!!
Amy Smithe says
They are alkllowed tolie to anyone they want to until; they gain their trust or take over; whichever is first. That is why they put out these kumbyyah type meetings of churches together becausse they are ‘so peaceful and want to be understood’….Liek heck they do; they are totalitarian and expect everyone to accept them or else…they demand that people accept their ways and live as they do and if to that is what jihad is all about killing the infidels, which are anyone that is not like them and believes as they do out of their books and revere the terrorist Muhammad, who was a murdering terrorist all through the counties he ruled. THEY ARE NOT A RELIGION; THEY ARE A SYSTEM OR CULT THAT USES ANYTHING THEY CAN TO GET WHAT THEY WANT;….THAT IS SATANIC. THERE IS NOTHING PEACEFUL ABOUT THEM; LOOK HOW THEY TREAT AND SUBJUGATE THEIR WOMEN, CHILDREN AND EACH OTHER! Islam IS A GROUP of people who live in INSANITY AND EVIL! There is nothing good about who, what or how they think- live or believe. We are in the war of good verses evil and they are evil. Read in their own books as to who and what they are….it is sickening, wrong and against all civil humanity! IT IS WAY PAST TIME TO STAND UP TO THEM AND TELL THEM TO ASSIMILATE OR GET THE H*** OUT OF AMERICA AND TAKE ANYONE THAT THINKS LIKE THEY DO WITH THEM!!
ISLAM AND MUSLIMS ARE NOT WANTED HERE BECAUSE THEY ARE TOTALLY OPPOSITE TO ALL WE ARE AND OUR WAY OF LIVING AND WE DO NOT HAVE TO OR WANT TO BE LIKE THEY ARE EVER! When they start spouting all their nonsense we should set them straight and tell them how we believe and what we stand for here in America, so they will stop trying to get us to be as they are…..
WE ARE NOT STANDING UP FOR AMERICA AND WE HAVE TO!
Gregory Brittain says
It hasn’t taken effect yet. I just searched “jihad” on Google. 1st page results included JihadWatch.org
BTW, conservatives should use https://duckduckgo.com/ as primary search engine and not support liberal Google
dave says
Googled “jihad” again, and Jihadwatch.org appeared on the first page. Last time, in response to a similar article, it appeared on the second page. Hardly demonstrates censorship. I live in Idaho. It would be useful to compare searches from different locations. Where does searching Google for “jihad” list jihadwatch farther down?
Sonny's Mom says
Dave: I searched on “jihad” from an Android phone (7/30/17, Boston area). Several tomes I closed out of Google too soon, so I reopened Google and searched again.
And guess what happened: with each new search, or if the page auto-refreshed, the order of results would change! Pro-jihad results would move higher on the list. Or new items would appear, bumping neutral items further down the list, or off page 1 to page 2. One time the original order got restored.
Does The Great Google think that by scrambling results they can keep everybody happy? Or is this just an Android artifact? Haven’t tried a hardwired device yet, but I plan to.
August says
Stop using Goggle they will k themselves.