These Muslim fanatics believe that “allah” will reward them with 72 Virgins & they could Not be more Wrong! Mohammad was a Dyslexic & misread the Quran! It says, “With 27 Virgins will I reward You, BUTT YOU won’t know if they are Male or female, until You get here SUCKERS”!!!
Phil Copsonsays
“These Muslim fanatics believe that “allah” will reward them with 72 Virgins & they could Not be more Wrong! Mohammad was a Dyslexic & misread the Quran!”
Indeed – a sex-crazed dyslexic whose vision of Paradise was a gigantic warehouse………
Andysays
Linda Sarsour: The Enemy of HUMANITY!
Emilie Greensays
Muslim Americans?
Like unicorns, they don’t exist. Neither do Muslim British, or Muslim Canadians, or Muslim French, and so forth. So maybe they have in hand all the paperwork of superficial citizenship, but all of that would have been falsely, fraudulently, obtained through lying.
Muslims prove this point over and over again. And they state it over and over as well. Namely, that they are loyal only to Islam, and to nothing else. Just listen to this Sarsour character (with emphasis on the “sour” part). Affirmed by the Orlando shooter, by the Fort Hood murderer, by the Boston Bombers, by the Paris Bombers, by the 911 hijackers, and on and on. Explaining why Muslims can never be trusted and never be considered loyal Americans, British, Canadians, French, Italian, Australian, and so forth. They represent an enemy living among us.
Here in America, as elsewhere, Muslims are out for colonization and conquest. They cannot be considered Americans because of their adoption of Islam, and their wish to impose it on us. By force, since they will follow their 1400-year practice, should we decline their we-won’t-be-taking-no-for-an-answer “offer” to adopt Islam. Shariah (total government) and American constitutional principles (government contained/controlled by the people) couldn’t be farther apart. To the Muslim no man-made law could ever be superior to the Shariah considered by them to come directly from their Allah.
Is it possible to conceive of a Muslim American? No way. At best and at most they can only be described as “Muslims who live in North America,” but they are not Americans in the heart, where it counts. I’m gladdened to see more and more real Americans are seeing Muslims for the danger that they are.
Davidsays
Good points.
gravenimagesays
Spot on.
Jean Terrysays
There are reformists like Zhudi Jasser, but he and those who agree with them are persecuted by other Muslims.
gravenimagesays
Even if he is sincere, he has virtually *no* Muslim followers. He has not even found a Mosque that will allow him to worship–not that agrees with him, mind you, but that will even allow him in the door. His only audience is hopeful Infidels.
JawsVsays
“Sarsour” means “cockroach” in Arabic. And she’s proud of it! (easy to find on ‘net)
Anti-jihadsays
Anni nails it every time! Thumbs up!
Voytek Gagalkasays
Linda Sarsour: a vile laying demagogue. Every statement she ever pronounces serves one purpose and one purpose only: to confuse. It makes me wonder only who is the boss in her own house when, after each harangue, she returns there and must face portion of Islam from her “loving” husband… Does she beat him for “disobedience,” contrary to sharia and “prophet’s traditions,” or vice versa? I would love to see how tough she is living day in and out under full onslaught of that barbaric law, how much her own “hijab” is just propaganda mask?
William James Rowansays
Seems to me her speech was an incitement to violence.
gravenimagesays
Yes, it was.
Moshesays
Mr. Spencer and Ms. Cyrus have misunderstood Linda’s intersectional use of the progressive term “Jihad.” According to friends and colleagues in the Muslim-American community, this term may refer only to a spiritual struggle. Examples include “my Jihad against obesity” or “my Jihad against opioid abuse.”
Renowned for her leaderhip of the women’s movement in America, Linda is surely using this term as meaning a spiritual resistance to the policies or rhetoric of the Trump Administration. This is not a call for violence.
It is the same thing for “Allahu akbar,” which may be shouted merely as an expression of joy, in the same sense as basketball fans may scream “Go Cavs” when LeBron makes a tripple-double.
It is important to understand the nuance of language.
ploomesays
jihad =the struggle to make islam supreme IN ANY AND ALL WAYS
“Allahu akbar”= allah is greater, sort of like “in the name of Jesus”
The singular exception to the majority opinion was that of Imam Shafi`i, who contended the verses [9:5] and [9:29] support the condition of jihad being a continual war upon the non-Muslims until they repent and accept Islam or else pay jizya [referred to as polltax].” However the majority of jurists argued against this position, citing the succeeding verses as evidence “and if anyone of the polytheists seeks your protection then grant him protection…” [9:6]. The other Imams argued from this that as long as they are submissive and willing to live peacefully among the believers our divine obligation is to treat them peacefully, despite their denial of Islam. The next verse [9:7], is instruction to keep treaty obligations with meticulous care, and not to break them unless the unbelievers break them first, reiterated in the following verse [9:8], in which Allah orders us not to make a treaty with unbelieving enemies who break their oaths and whose intention is to overpower the Muslims. Had jihad’s objective been to fight all unbelievers, then there would have been no need for treaties and no differentiation between polytheists who remain loyal and faithful to their word and those who are treacherous. Based on these arguments of the scholars, the majority concluded that physical fighting is not a permanent condition against unbelievers, but only when treaties are broken or aggression has been made against Muslim territory (dar al-Islam) by unbelievers.
On the other hand, the call to Islam, is a continuous jihad, per the hadith “I have been ordered to fight the people until they declare that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is His Messenger, establish prayers, and pay zakat. If they perform all that, their blood and property are guaranteed protection on my behalf except when justified by Islamic laws. Then their accounts will be done by Allah.” (Bukhari and Muslim). Said Ramadan Buti in “Jihad in Islam”, explains this hadith in detail, showing that contrary to the minority opinion, fighting here does not refer to combat but to struggle, including within it da`wah, preaching, exhortation and establishment of the state apparatus whereby Islamic preaching is protected; not forcing anyone to become Muslim at the point of a sword. Many examples from the Prophet’s r life history show he never forced conversion, nor did his Successors. He explains that the linguistic scholars of hadith showed that the word used by the Prophet (saws) means “fight”, not “kill”. Its Arabic usage denotes defense against an attacker or oppressor; not to attack or assail.
No, in fact she believes in a third interpretation of jihad, one put forward by “the progressive Muslims” (see book of the same name), which is tied to the ideal of social justice. So it is not the same as inner or spiritual jihad. Not at all. The “progressive” version of jihad is in alliance with the version that sanctions defensive violence of Islam in the following sense: it is about undermining Western values of equality, democracy, and individual rights, and replacing it with neo-Marxism. Except that Linda Sarsour is actually a double-agent for violent Islam, I believe, and is merely using neo-Marxist third-wave feminism to advance the hegemony of the Islamic state. Why else would she try to soft-sell sharia law, which is manifestly inegalitarian? Her followers are the very definition of Lenin’s “useful idiots.” The progressive form of jihad is about eroding the West from within, softening it up for the violent form of jihad to follow, once there are enough Muslims to carry out the latter. There are in fact a number of women like Sarsour around, advancing a mix of Islam, feminism, and anti-Western “progressive” ideology. She is just the most well known. They have infiltrated gender studies over the last 15 or so years. Gender and race studies must be understood as propaganda meant to undermine Western culture from within by brainwashing young people to hate their own culture and work towards a utopian society. Of course, as with all utopian dreams it will end up in a nightmare of violence, and those who promoted it will realize their mistake too late.
Enoch was rightsays
The point of the above statements on Trudeau are to point out that he is also a useful idiot for some very violent people, people who have no compunction about destroying Canada. He is for egalitarian values and diversity and the kind of saccharin worldview in which everyone should just hug and love each other and be happy. He is like many progressives: a dreamer, a fool. The world is a harsh and unrelenting place full of evil men, men who have no hesitation to murder and rape and impose themselves as tyrants. This happened in Iran in 1979, and in many other places since. The strategy in Europe and Canada is to take over through reproduction, to amass an army of believers through which Islam can spread. Islam has spread throughout the world for 1400 years in this way. There are a number of dreamers and useful idiots within the faith as well, who advance progressive Islam (e.g. pro-LGBTQ, pro-feminist), thinking that that will somehow replace Islamism. But the latter is stronger and will prevail if it gets a foothold. Trudeau should be more like Churchill – defending the West from those force that threaten it – not blindly accepting the Trojan horse of violent jihadism into Canada. There are legitimate refugees from Syria and elsewhere and Canada should give them asylum, but it’s important to distinguish them from the Islamists. There should be a stronger vetting system in place than now exists. Trudeau is a populist who just wants to be liked. He is a fool. He is laying the foundation for the destruction of Canada, against the wishes of many refugees who have faced these horrors and know all too well what is going on. He should listen to people like Tarek Fatah. But he is a globalist and utopian. There is a rich irony in the fact that he uses these terms at a pride parade while gay people are being thrown from the roof and stoned in Islam theocracies.
Allahu Akbar shouted after a goal is scored in a sports game is a form of joyous expression;, but when these words are exhorted as the shootings and stabbings begin, there can be no doubt that a terrorist act is in play.
Jerrysays
…It is the same thing for “Allahu akbar,” which may be shouted merely as an expression of joy…
Shouting “Allahu akbar” may be an expression of joy, but it’s also an expression of allegiance to his criminal and bigoted teachings, too. Allah teaches murder and hatred against non-muslims solely for their religious convictions, a clear human rights violation and a crime. Your basketball analogy is feeble and false as it does not consider the underlying factors that motivate basketball players and muslims. Muslims worship and revere a god that teaches this violence while basketball players try to score points and win games. A clear difference that renders your analogy false and babyishly ignorant.
According to friends and colleagues in the Muslim-American community, this term may refer only to a spiritual struggle.
You can try to mitigate jihad’s ugly connotation by characterizing it as spiritual struggle, but the sad truth, spiritual struggle in islam includes murder, enslavement, and torture. I know this because that’s what allah teaches. The spiritual heart of islam has always been overcoming the “unbelief” and “idolatry” of others, and to do that allah condones crimes against humanity. So when someone like Sarsour calls for jihad against our president we can safely assume she ain’t talking about fatness. The open-ended nature of the term has always included terror and murder against non-muslim people and states. In light of the mass violence muslims now commit for their religion, and considering their centuries old commitment to that ideology, I think it’s reasonable to interpret her words as a veiled threat. After all, spiritual struggle in islam was never really about obesity and drugs. It was about killing or conquering the infidel for allah. That’s the spiritual heart of islam, and that’s the spiritual heart of “jihad.”
gravenimagesays
Moshe was being sarcastic, guys.
Jerrysays
“Moshe was being sarcastic, guys.”
Considering the idiocy that comes out of some people’s mouths in defense of islam ya can’t be sure when they’re serious or just clowning. What Moshe has there ain’t any dumber than calling islam a “religion of peace,” and we got practically every western politician doing that.
gravenimagesays
That’s why I always use the “sarc” tag, myself. Irony can be difficult to read.
Lorsays
Trudeau did come across very odd when he threw in “Allah Pride” in commenting in the LGBTQ Pride Day. I did find it rather amusing recently where a group of transvestites protected a mosque during another gay pride event.
Lastly, Annie brings up clear points well taken but distracts (in my opinion) with her hair tossing and such.
Mockingjaysays
– I must say find the “hair-tossing” to be a nice contrast to the swaddled muslima behind her, and a highly symbolic act in a way – the physically – and mentally – free ex – muslim, and then this cockroach woman that seems to barely be able to move her head independently from her neck – that’s how tight this “hijab” obviously is wrapped.
She will be elected to Congress or the Senate in Minnesota or Michiganistan.
Hindu Americansays
Linda Sarsour was born in Brooklyn but she has a middle eastern accent.
Tangatasays
Time for Americans to stand up for America and to call out Muslims of America to take a stand… Stand for America or to stand for the Linda Sarsours of the Islamists of America, and hold them to account.
pennant8says
My favorite way to describe Muslims like Linda Sarsour is to call them grifters. That’s what she and the dozens and dozens of alphabet soup Islamic organizations that have set up shop here in the US are, they’re just grifters. But unlike most grifters who try to scam us out of our cash, these grifters are trying to scam us out of our culture.
Why does she keep saying ‘in this United States of America’? why not say the United States of America?
Mockingjaysays
– Because “this United States of America” is not the United States of America that SHE aspires to, I would say…
And btw – isn’t it THESE United States of America?
lasslaxsays
This Linda Cockroach makes me puke
Mockingjaysays
– Hey I’ve got a question that I’ve only just thought of:
– WHY would the cockroach use the word “jihad” AT ALL in a speech?
– She could’ve used ANY other (leftist) term to instigate “defiance” against Trump – but she PURPOSELY chose the word “jihad” for it, out of ALL other possible words that she could have used.
– Of course it tells you everything you need to know that amongst the media outlets defending her using THAT particular LOADED term, NOT ONE asked this really VERY obvious and pressing question.
Why did you pick that term, linda (and what kind of a name is Linda for an islamist muslim anyway?) – what were you trying to communicate, and what were you trying to instigate?
“Just” some more contempt for and “resistance” against president Trump? Or, in reality, something very, very much more sinister?
TheBuffstersays
Mockingjay – THAT is a very interesting question. I didn’t think of it, and yet now that you’ve pointed it out is seems so glaringly obvious. “Jihad” is a supremely loaded word and everyone – including Sarsour, knows it. She wanted to stir up controversy and strife.
Mockingjaysays
– Yes, exactly, Buffster.
Sometimes the most obvious will escape us because we’ve become too used to it.
We’ve become too used to the word “jihad” and now we collectively don’t even notice that muslims use this word ON PURPOSE to manipulate us.
– See, In the end, it’s quite irrelevant whether “jihad” can mean “other things” too – the fact that it is ALSO and even PRIMARELY used to identify violent warfare on non-muslims CAN and HAS been widely proven – for example in Roberts’ latest piece on Sarsour’s speech – and EVEN if it would also mean MANY other things, like. say, “using the bathroom” (toilet jihad!), that would still not undo the primary meaning it came to have for the Western world, and it would be wise for any muslim to be a bit more considerate and modest with the use of this term.
– Of course, it’s not in a muslim’s nature to be considerate and modest toward non-muslims, but apart from that, I think that using this word here as Sarsour does is COMPLETELY AND UTTERLY INTENTIONAL.
TheBuffstersays
Here is a video by David Wood revealing the nature of the man that Sarsour claims as a friend and *mentor*, Imam Siraj Wahhaj.
She speaks of Wahhaj in glowing terms. So who is he? What’ *his* jihad?
Thanks for the link to the incomparable David Wood, Buffster.
Note that this means that Sarsour is saying that Trump is “oppressive” because he is not allowing Muslims to destroy democracy and replace it with Islam.
Notice that he never actually says that he wasn’t involved in the 1993 WTC bombing, nor that he opposes such Jihad terror.
He says that Islam is “great for America” because a convicted murderer wants to teach gangs about Islam. He is proud of the numbers of Muslims in prison, and gloats over them getting out every day.
He sneers at Infidels who consider Shari’ah to be “cutting off the hand” and “stoning someone to death”, but that they “don’t see the beauty of Islam”. These horrors are what pious Muslims consider “beautiful”. *Ugh*.
LOCK HER UP! Linda Sarsour, the darling of the Islamist/Leftist consortium of anarchists currently trying to overthrow the United States government is at it again. In a stunning seditious address to the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) she unapologetically and emphatically called on Muslims to wage jihad in America against duly elected President Trump and the White House by saying:
“We (Muslims) are struggling against tyrants and rulers not only abroad . . . but here in the United States of America, where you have fascists and white supremacists and Islamophobes reigning in the White House. . . . Our number one and top priority is to protect and defend our community. It is not to assimilate and to please any other people in authority. And our top priority . . . is to please Allah, and only Allah.”
Linda Sarsour is openly fomenting insurrection and allegiance to Allah in pursuit of the Islamic goal to re-establish the Islamic caliphate and impose sharia law worldwide. Why hasn’t Linda Sarsour been arrested and charged with treason??
It seems the noisy Brooklyn born Palestinian-American Muslim needs a refresher course in American democracy. In America we are still ruled by secular American laws and the United States Constitution. We are not ruled by religious Islamic sharia law. So, if Linda Sarsour prefers an Islamic government she is free to live in any one of a number of Islamic theocracies in the world. The tolerance that American democracy has extended to multiculturalism reaches its tipping point when Islamists, whether foreign born or natural born like Sarsour, demand that America submit to religious sharia law and become dhimmis in their own country.
All across Europe the consequences of Western nations tolerating intolerant Muslims are manifest. It is cultural suicide to import masses of Muslim immigrants with hostile cultural norms. It is a fiction of the Left that Muslim immigrants will assimilate. To the contrary, the mass immigration of Muslims into Europe and America is HIJRAH – a form of population jihad that is endorsed, encouraged, and rewarded by Islamic sharia law. Sharia compliant protesters like Sarsour are advancing Islam in America in an effort to replace American democracy with religious sharia law. Her allegiance is to Allah and not to America – she is an enemy of the state.
Again I ask, Why hasn’t Linda Sarsour been arrested and charged with treason??
Immigration without assimilation is invasion. Americans have been duped by the left-wing liberals and the colluding mainstream media into believing that the worldwide refugee “crisis” is a humanitarian calamity. The only humanitarian calamity is the stunning willingness of the West to be duped, invaded, submit to Islam, and become dhimmis in their own countries.
How did America reach the point where an Islamist like Linda Sarsour can publicly address a Muslim group also seeking to conquer the West and openly call for jihad against the President of the United States without being arrested and charged with treason??
The answer is that for two generations Americans have been indoctrinated in left-wing liberal tenets of political correctness, moral relativism, and historical revisionism brought to America courtesy of Tavistock Institute in a deliberate effort to destroy American democracy and American dominance in the world.
Since the end of WWII the globalist elite of the world have been colluding to internationalize the world and create an unimpeded global marketplace to enrich themselves and further their goal of imposing one-world government. Described unapologetically by aristocrat Lord Bertrand Russell sixty-five years ago in his 1952 book The Impact of Science on Society, one-world government is a binary socio-political system of elite rulers and an enslaved population who serve them. The United States emerged from WWII as the dominant military, political, and economic force in the world – invincible, impenetrable, and impregnable – and the single greatest obstacle to one-world government.
The destruction of America was impossible from the outside in – it would have to be accomplished from the inside out. Tavistock Institute was exported to the United States from England to accomplish psychologically what was impossible to accomplish militarily – the destruction of America from within. Islamists were exposed as having the same goal in papers found in the home of Ismael Elbarasse, a founder of the Dar Al-Hijrah mosque in Falls Church, Virginia, during a 2004 search:
“The process of settlement is a ‘Civilization-Jihadist Process’ with all the word means. The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers…”
Ex-president Barack Obama became a radical Leftist tutored in the value of community organizing by radical socialist Saul Alinsky. Obama entered the world stage as the face of globalism and an internationalized world. His disingenuous campaign of hope and change were code words for destroying American democracy and replacing it with socialism. Hillary Clinton, also a radical left-wing socialist follower of Saul Alinsky, was to be Obama’s third term.
The destruction was envisioned sequentially: Public indoctrination toward collectivism through education and mainstream media -> break down of established morality and cultural norms of behavior -> create social chaos -> impose martial law -> impose socialism -> internationalize police force -> impose one-world government.
Independence of any kind, particularly critical thinking skills, poses a threat to tyranny – the goal was complete passivity and dependence upon the government because a dependent population is easily manipulated. This explains Obama’s anti-American policies that crushed the economy, weakened the military, incentivized government assistance, and indoctrinated American children toward socialism. It also explains Hillary Clinton’s stunning remark that “we (Democratic Party) need an unaware and compliant population.”
The Obama Leftists and the Islamists joined forces to bring down America from within – and then came President Donald Trump who shocked the Left by beating Hillary in the presidential election. President Trump is an unapologetic American patriot who believes in American sovereignty, American exceptionalism, and making America great again. He is the existential threat and enemy of one-world government today just as America was the existential threat and enemy of one-world government after WWII.
The Islamists and radical Left have common cause to destroy American democracy. What both are too arrogant to understand is that the globalist elites who fund the Left consider both parties to be useful idiots whose sole purpose is to create overwhelming social chaos. The globalist elite have every intention of eliminating or enslaving both the Islamists and the Leftists as soon as the police force is internationalized. The globalist elites have no use for social chaos makers in their one-world government.
President Donald Trump is the only force standing between democracy and the return to a world of masters and slaves.
FYIsays
Linda needs to wear the full burqa.She simply MUST cover up.
For allah hates a stupid muslima woman with a weird face.
It’s a sin against allah.
“For allah hatheth all women with facial hair and who listen to the song of a songstress;I will pour molten lead down the throat of such a muslima”
We know who our friends are and we also know who is our enemy. WE ARE AT WAR WITH MUSLIMS AND THEIR DEMONIC POLITICAL CULT….Send them all back to the Middle East….evict them…they are not happy here. They are on a mission to quietly multiply and infiltrate (DAWA) all facets of our society…..the radicals are openly aggressive and violent. The moderates who appear to be “nice” “peaceful” people will show us just how nice and peaceful they are when they are in control, in power…..SEND OUR ENEMY TO THEIR OWN BACK YARDS AND GET THEM OUT OF OURS….WE DON’T WANT THEM HERE AND IN FACT, THEY ARE NOT ELIGIBLE TO BE HERE BECAUSE THEY DO NOT WANT TO BE AMERICAN AND ASSIMILATE INTO OUR CULTURE…THEY DO NOT BELONG HERE…GET THEM OUT..EVICT THEM NOW!!!!
Jacqueleensays
Thank you, Anni for speaking out…..May you be forever blessed with courage and God’s protection.
Discover more from
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
Buford says
SHE IS A HOG & A DEMONIC P O S
Andy says
Maybe she should get on board the TRUMP TRAIN! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qSNpxvn8TH0&t=5s
Tonny says
Acording to christanprince on youtube Muslims have funny names her name means “cockroach”, Muhammad last name means “Dog”
Timothy McAlee, Sr. G.eD. says
These Muslim fanatics believe that “allah” will reward them with 72 Virgins & they could Not be more Wrong! Mohammad was a Dyslexic & misread the Quran! It says, “With 27 Virgins will I reward You, BUTT YOU won’t know if they are Male or female, until You get here SUCKERS”!!!
Phil Copson says
“These Muslim fanatics believe that “allah” will reward them with 72 Virgins & they could Not be more Wrong! Mohammad was a Dyslexic & misread the Quran!”
Indeed – a sex-crazed dyslexic whose vision of Paradise was a gigantic warehouse………
Andy says
Linda Sarsour: The Enemy of HUMANITY!
Emilie Green says
Muslim Americans?
Like unicorns, they don’t exist. Neither do Muslim British, or Muslim Canadians, or Muslim French, and so forth. So maybe they have in hand all the paperwork of superficial citizenship, but all of that would have been falsely, fraudulently, obtained through lying.
Muslims prove this point over and over again. And they state it over and over as well. Namely, that they are loyal only to Islam, and to nothing else. Just listen to this Sarsour character (with emphasis on the “sour” part). Affirmed by the Orlando shooter, by the Fort Hood murderer, by the Boston Bombers, by the Paris Bombers, by the 911 hijackers, and on and on. Explaining why Muslims can never be trusted and never be considered loyal Americans, British, Canadians, French, Italian, Australian, and so forth. They represent an enemy living among us.
Here in America, as elsewhere, Muslims are out for colonization and conquest. They cannot be considered Americans because of their adoption of Islam, and their wish to impose it on us. By force, since they will follow their 1400-year practice, should we decline their we-won’t-be-taking-no-for-an-answer “offer” to adopt Islam. Shariah (total government) and American constitutional principles (government contained/controlled by the people) couldn’t be farther apart. To the Muslim no man-made law could ever be superior to the Shariah considered by them to come directly from their Allah.
Is it possible to conceive of a Muslim American? No way. At best and at most they can only be described as “Muslims who live in North America,” but they are not Americans in the heart, where it counts. I’m gladdened to see more and more real Americans are seeing Muslims for the danger that they are.
David says
Good points.
gravenimage says
Spot on.
Jean Terry says
There are reformists like Zhudi Jasser, but he and those who agree with them are persecuted by other Muslims.
gravenimage says
Even if he is sincere, he has virtually *no* Muslim followers. He has not even found a Mosque that will allow him to worship–not that agrees with him, mind you, but that will even allow him in the door. His only audience is hopeful Infidels.
JawsV says
“Sarsour” means “cockroach” in Arabic. And she’s proud of it! (easy to find on ‘net)
Anti-jihad says
Anni nails it every time! Thumbs up!
Voytek Gagalka says
Linda Sarsour: a vile laying demagogue. Every statement she ever pronounces serves one purpose and one purpose only: to confuse. It makes me wonder only who is the boss in her own house when, after each harangue, she returns there and must face portion of Islam from her “loving” husband… Does she beat him for “disobedience,” contrary to sharia and “prophet’s traditions,” or vice versa? I would love to see how tough she is living day in and out under full onslaught of that barbaric law, how much her own “hijab” is just propaganda mask?
William James Rowan says
Seems to me her speech was an incitement to violence.
gravenimage says
Yes, it was.
Moshe says
Mr. Spencer and Ms. Cyrus have misunderstood Linda’s intersectional use of the progressive term “Jihad.” According to friends and colleagues in the Muslim-American community, this term may refer only to a spiritual struggle. Examples include “my Jihad against obesity” or “my Jihad against opioid abuse.”
Renowned for her leaderhip of the women’s movement in America, Linda is surely using this term as meaning a spiritual resistance to the policies or rhetoric of the Trump Administration. This is not a call for violence.
It is the same thing for “Allahu akbar,” which may be shouted merely as an expression of joy, in the same sense as basketball fans may scream “Go Cavs” when LeBron makes a tripple-double.
It is important to understand the nuance of language.
ploome says
jihad =the struggle to make islam supreme IN ANY AND ALL WAYS
“Allahu akbar”= allah is greater, sort of like “in the name of Jesus”
jihad- http://islam.uga.edu/jihad.html
http://www.islamicsupremecouncil.org/understanding-islam/legal-rulings/5-jihad-a-misunderstood-concept-from-islam.html?start=10
The singular exception to the majority opinion was that of Imam Shafi`i, who contended the verses [9:5] and [9:29] support the condition of jihad being a continual war upon the non-Muslims until they repent and accept Islam or else pay jizya [referred to as polltax].” However the majority of jurists argued against this position, citing the succeeding verses as evidence “and if anyone of the polytheists seeks your protection then grant him protection…” [9:6]. The other Imams argued from this that as long as they are submissive and willing to live peacefully among the believers our divine obligation is to treat them peacefully, despite their denial of Islam. The next verse [9:7], is instruction to keep treaty obligations with meticulous care, and not to break them unless the unbelievers break them first, reiterated in the following verse [9:8], in which Allah orders us not to make a treaty with unbelieving enemies who break their oaths and whose intention is to overpower the Muslims. Had jihad’s objective been to fight all unbelievers, then there would have been no need for treaties and no differentiation between polytheists who remain loyal and faithful to their word and those who are treacherous. Based on these arguments of the scholars, the majority concluded that physical fighting is not a permanent condition against unbelievers, but only when treaties are broken or aggression has been made against Muslim territory (dar al-Islam) by unbelievers.
On the other hand, the call to Islam, is a continuous jihad, per the hadith “I have been ordered to fight the people until they declare that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is His Messenger, establish prayers, and pay zakat. If they perform all that, their blood and property are guaranteed protection on my behalf except when justified by Islamic laws. Then their accounts will be done by Allah.” (Bukhari and Muslim). Said Ramadan Buti in “Jihad in Islam”, explains this hadith in detail, showing that contrary to the minority opinion, fighting here does not refer to combat but to struggle, including within it da`wah, preaching, exhortation and establishment of the state apparatus whereby Islamic preaching is protected; not forcing anyone to become Muslim at the point of a sword. Many examples from the Prophet’s r life history show he never forced conversion, nor did his Successors. He explains that the linguistic scholars of hadith showed that the word used by the Prophet (saws) means “fight”, not “kill”. Its Arabic usage denotes defense against an attacker or oppressor; not to attack or assail.
and of course the ‘stages of jihad’
https://ctc.usma.edu/posts/understanding-history’s-seven-stages-of-jihad
Mike9a says
You live on what planet?
Enoch was right says
No, in fact she believes in a third interpretation of jihad, one put forward by “the progressive Muslims” (see book of the same name), which is tied to the ideal of social justice. So it is not the same as inner or spiritual jihad. Not at all. The “progressive” version of jihad is in alliance with the version that sanctions defensive violence of Islam in the following sense: it is about undermining Western values of equality, democracy, and individual rights, and replacing it with neo-Marxism. Except that Linda Sarsour is actually a double-agent for violent Islam, I believe, and is merely using neo-Marxist third-wave feminism to advance the hegemony of the Islamic state. Why else would she try to soft-sell sharia law, which is manifestly inegalitarian? Her followers are the very definition of Lenin’s “useful idiots.” The progressive form of jihad is about eroding the West from within, softening it up for the violent form of jihad to follow, once there are enough Muslims to carry out the latter. There are in fact a number of women like Sarsour around, advancing a mix of Islam, feminism, and anti-Western “progressive” ideology. She is just the most well known. They have infiltrated gender studies over the last 15 or so years. Gender and race studies must be understood as propaganda meant to undermine Western culture from within by brainwashing young people to hate their own culture and work towards a utopian society. Of course, as with all utopian dreams it will end up in a nightmare of violence, and those who promoted it will realize their mistake too late.
Enoch was right says
The point of the above statements on Trudeau are to point out that he is also a useful idiot for some very violent people, people who have no compunction about destroying Canada. He is for egalitarian values and diversity and the kind of saccharin worldview in which everyone should just hug and love each other and be happy. He is like many progressives: a dreamer, a fool. The world is a harsh and unrelenting place full of evil men, men who have no hesitation to murder and rape and impose themselves as tyrants. This happened in Iran in 1979, and in many other places since. The strategy in Europe and Canada is to take over through reproduction, to amass an army of believers through which Islam can spread. Islam has spread throughout the world for 1400 years in this way. There are a number of dreamers and useful idiots within the faith as well, who advance progressive Islam (e.g. pro-LGBTQ, pro-feminist), thinking that that will somehow replace Islamism. But the latter is stronger and will prevail if it gets a foothold. Trudeau should be more like Churchill – defending the West from those force that threaten it – not blindly accepting the Trojan horse of violent jihadism into Canada. There are legitimate refugees from Syria and elsewhere and Canada should give them asylum, but it’s important to distinguish them from the Islamists. There should be a stronger vetting system in place than now exists. Trudeau is a populist who just wants to be liked. He is a fool. He is laying the foundation for the destruction of Canada, against the wishes of many refugees who have faced these horrors and know all too well what is going on. He should listen to people like Tarek Fatah. But he is a globalist and utopian. There is a rich irony in the fact that he uses these terms at a pride parade while gay people are being thrown from the roof and stoned in Islam theocracies.
jesse says
It is wayyyyyy more important to understand Islam and jihad than it is to understand the “nuances of language”.
JawsV says
It’s my take that Moshe was being sarcastic.
David says
Allahu Akbar shouted after a goal is scored in a sports game is a form of joyous expression;, but when these words are exhorted as the shootings and stabbings begin, there can be no doubt that a terrorist act is in play.
Jerry says
…It is the same thing for “Allahu akbar,” which may be shouted merely as an expression of joy…
Shouting “Allahu akbar” may be an expression of joy, but it’s also an expression of allegiance to his criminal and bigoted teachings, too. Allah teaches murder and hatred against non-muslims solely for their religious convictions, a clear human rights violation and a crime. Your basketball analogy is feeble and false as it does not consider the underlying factors that motivate basketball players and muslims. Muslims worship and revere a god that teaches this violence while basketball players try to score points and win games. A clear difference that renders your analogy false and babyishly ignorant.
According to friends and colleagues in the Muslim-American community, this term may refer only to a spiritual struggle.
You can try to mitigate jihad’s ugly connotation by characterizing it as spiritual struggle, but the sad truth, spiritual struggle in islam includes murder, enslavement, and torture. I know this because that’s what allah teaches. The spiritual heart of islam has always been overcoming the “unbelief” and “idolatry” of others, and to do that allah condones crimes against humanity. So when someone like Sarsour calls for jihad against our president we can safely assume she ain’t talking about fatness. The open-ended nature of the term has always included terror and murder against non-muslim people and states. In light of the mass violence muslims now commit for their religion, and considering their centuries old commitment to that ideology, I think it’s reasonable to interpret her words as a veiled threat. After all, spiritual struggle in islam was never really about obesity and drugs. It was about killing or conquering the infidel for allah. That’s the spiritual heart of islam, and that’s the spiritual heart of “jihad.”
gravenimage says
Moshe was being sarcastic, guys.
Jerry says
“Moshe was being sarcastic, guys.”
Considering the idiocy that comes out of some people’s mouths in defense of islam ya can’t be sure when they’re serious or just clowning. What Moshe has there ain’t any dumber than calling islam a “religion of peace,” and we got practically every western politician doing that.
gravenimage says
That’s why I always use the “sarc” tag, myself. Irony can be difficult to read.
Lor says
Trudeau did come across very odd when he threw in “Allah Pride” in commenting in the LGBTQ Pride Day. I did find it rather amusing recently where a group of transvestites protected a mosque during another gay pride event.
Lastly, Annie brings up clear points well taken but distracts (in my opinion) with her hair tossing and such.
Mockingjay says
– I must say find the “hair-tossing” to be a nice contrast to the swaddled muslima behind her, and a highly symbolic act in a way – the physically – and mentally – free ex – muslim, and then this cockroach woman that seems to barely be able to move her head independently from her neck – that’s how tight this “hijab” obviously is wrapped.
And apart from that – Anni ‘s got GREAT hair!
gravenimage says
Agreed, Mockingjay.
David says
She will be elected to Congress or the Senate in Minnesota or Michiganistan.
Hindu American says
Linda Sarsour was born in Brooklyn but she has a middle eastern accent.
Tangata says
Time for Americans to stand up for America and to call out Muslims of America to take a stand… Stand for America or to stand for the Linda Sarsours of the Islamists of America, and hold them to account.
pennant8 says
My favorite way to describe Muslims like Linda Sarsour is to call them grifters. That’s what she and the dozens and dozens of alphabet soup Islamic organizations that have set up shop here in the US are, they’re just grifters. But unlike most grifters who try to scam us out of our cash, these grifters are trying to scam us out of our culture.
African American says
Why does she keep saying ‘in this United States of America’? why not say the United States of America?
Mockingjay says
– Because “this United States of America” is not the United States of America that SHE aspires to, I would say…
And btw – isn’t it THESE United States of America?
lasslax says
This Linda Cockroach makes me puke
Mockingjay says
– Hey I’ve got a question that I’ve only just thought of:
– WHY would the cockroach use the word “jihad” AT ALL in a speech?
– She could’ve used ANY other (leftist) term to instigate “defiance” against Trump – but she PURPOSELY chose the word “jihad” for it, out of ALL other possible words that she could have used.
– Of course it tells you everything you need to know that amongst the media outlets defending her using THAT particular LOADED term, NOT ONE asked this really VERY obvious and pressing question.
Why did you pick that term, linda (and what kind of a name is Linda for an islamist muslim anyway?) – what were you trying to communicate, and what were you trying to instigate?
“Just” some more contempt for and “resistance” against president Trump? Or, in reality, something very, very much more sinister?
TheBuffster says
Mockingjay – THAT is a very interesting question. I didn’t think of it, and yet now that you’ve pointed it out is seems so glaringly obvious. “Jihad” is a supremely loaded word and everyone – including Sarsour, knows it. She wanted to stir up controversy and strife.
Mockingjay says
– Yes, exactly, Buffster.
Sometimes the most obvious will escape us because we’ve become too used to it.
We’ve become too used to the word “jihad” and now we collectively don’t even notice that muslims use this word ON PURPOSE to manipulate us.
– See, In the end, it’s quite irrelevant whether “jihad” can mean “other things” too – the fact that it is ALSO and even PRIMARELY used to identify violent warfare on non-muslims CAN and HAS been widely proven – for example in Roberts’ latest piece on Sarsour’s speech – and EVEN if it would also mean MANY other things, like. say, “using the bathroom” (toilet jihad!), that would still not undo the primary meaning it came to have for the Western world, and it would be wise for any muslim to be a bit more considerate and modest with the use of this term.
– Of course, it’s not in a muslim’s nature to be considerate and modest toward non-muslims, but apart from that, I think that using this word here as Sarsour does is COMPLETELY AND UTTERLY INTENTIONAL.
TheBuffster says
Here is a video by David Wood revealing the nature of the man that Sarsour claims as a friend and *mentor*, Imam Siraj Wahhaj.
She speaks of Wahhaj in glowing terms. So who is he? What’ *his* jihad?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0DOo8-_mlzo
gravenimage says
Thanks for the link to the incomparable David Wood, Buffster.
Note that this means that Sarsour is saying that Trump is “oppressive” because he is not allowing Muslims to destroy democracy and replace it with Islam.
Here’s another hideous video from Siraj Wahhaj:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLvpx_a9M0c
Notice that he never actually says that he wasn’t involved in the 1993 WTC bombing, nor that he opposes such Jihad terror.
He says that Islam is “great for America” because a convicted murderer wants to teach gangs about Islam. He is proud of the numbers of Muslims in prison, and gloats over them getting out every day.
He sneers at Infidels who consider Shari’ah to be “cutting off the hand” and “stoning someone to death”, but that they “don’t see the beauty of Islam”. These horrors are what pious Muslims consider “beautiful”. *Ugh*.
gravenimage says
Thank you, Anni Cyrus!
scherado says
I prefer “irrational fear” to “fear of something that doesn’t exist.”
Linda Goudsmit says
LOCK HER UP! Linda Sarsour, the darling of the Islamist/Leftist consortium of anarchists currently trying to overthrow the United States government is at it again. In a stunning seditious address to the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) she unapologetically and emphatically called on Muslims to wage jihad in America against duly elected President Trump and the White House by saying:
“We (Muslims) are struggling against tyrants and rulers not only abroad . . . but here in the United States of America, where you have fascists and white supremacists and Islamophobes reigning in the White House. . . . Our number one and top priority is to protect and defend our community. It is not to assimilate and to please any other people in authority. And our top priority . . . is to please Allah, and only Allah.”
Linda Sarsour is openly fomenting insurrection and allegiance to Allah in pursuit of the Islamic goal to re-establish the Islamic caliphate and impose sharia law worldwide. Why hasn’t Linda Sarsour been arrested and charged with treason??
It seems the noisy Brooklyn born Palestinian-American Muslim needs a refresher course in American democracy. In America we are still ruled by secular American laws and the United States Constitution. We are not ruled by religious Islamic sharia law. So, if Linda Sarsour prefers an Islamic government she is free to live in any one of a number of Islamic theocracies in the world. The tolerance that American democracy has extended to multiculturalism reaches its tipping point when Islamists, whether foreign born or natural born like Sarsour, demand that America submit to religious sharia law and become dhimmis in their own country.
All across Europe the consequences of Western nations tolerating intolerant Muslims are manifest. It is cultural suicide to import masses of Muslim immigrants with hostile cultural norms. It is a fiction of the Left that Muslim immigrants will assimilate. To the contrary, the mass immigration of Muslims into Europe and America is HIJRAH – a form of population jihad that is endorsed, encouraged, and rewarded by Islamic sharia law. Sharia compliant protesters like Sarsour are advancing Islam in America in an effort to replace American democracy with religious sharia law. Her allegiance is to Allah and not to America – she is an enemy of the state.
Again I ask, Why hasn’t Linda Sarsour been arrested and charged with treason??
Immigration without assimilation is invasion. Americans have been duped by the left-wing liberals and the colluding mainstream media into believing that the worldwide refugee “crisis” is a humanitarian calamity. The only humanitarian calamity is the stunning willingness of the West to be duped, invaded, submit to Islam, and become dhimmis in their own countries.
How did America reach the point where an Islamist like Linda Sarsour can publicly address a Muslim group also seeking to conquer the West and openly call for jihad against the President of the United States without being arrested and charged with treason??
The answer is that for two generations Americans have been indoctrinated in left-wing liberal tenets of political correctness, moral relativism, and historical revisionism brought to America courtesy of Tavistock Institute in a deliberate effort to destroy American democracy and American dominance in the world.
Since the end of WWII the globalist elite of the world have been colluding to internationalize the world and create an unimpeded global marketplace to enrich themselves and further their goal of imposing one-world government. Described unapologetically by aristocrat Lord Bertrand Russell sixty-five years ago in his 1952 book The Impact of Science on Society, one-world government is a binary socio-political system of elite rulers and an enslaved population who serve them. The United States emerged from WWII as the dominant military, political, and economic force in the world – invincible, impenetrable, and impregnable – and the single greatest obstacle to one-world government.
The destruction of America was impossible from the outside in – it would have to be accomplished from the inside out. Tavistock Institute was exported to the United States from England to accomplish psychologically what was impossible to accomplish militarily – the destruction of America from within. Islamists were exposed as having the same goal in papers found in the home of Ismael Elbarasse, a founder of the Dar Al-Hijrah mosque in Falls Church, Virginia, during a 2004 search:
“The process of settlement is a ‘Civilization-Jihadist Process’ with all the word means. The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers…”
Ex-president Barack Obama became a radical Leftist tutored in the value of community organizing by radical socialist Saul Alinsky. Obama entered the world stage as the face of globalism and an internationalized world. His disingenuous campaign of hope and change were code words for destroying American democracy and replacing it with socialism. Hillary Clinton, also a radical left-wing socialist follower of Saul Alinsky, was to be Obama’s third term.
The destruction was envisioned sequentially: Public indoctrination toward collectivism through education and mainstream media -> break down of established morality and cultural norms of behavior -> create social chaos -> impose martial law -> impose socialism -> internationalize police force -> impose one-world government.
Independence of any kind, particularly critical thinking skills, poses a threat to tyranny – the goal was complete passivity and dependence upon the government because a dependent population is easily manipulated. This explains Obama’s anti-American policies that crushed the economy, weakened the military, incentivized government assistance, and indoctrinated American children toward socialism. It also explains Hillary Clinton’s stunning remark that “we (Democratic Party) need an unaware and compliant population.”
The Obama Leftists and the Islamists joined forces to bring down America from within – and then came President Donald Trump who shocked the Left by beating Hillary in the presidential election. President Trump is an unapologetic American patriot who believes in American sovereignty, American exceptionalism, and making America great again. He is the existential threat and enemy of one-world government today just as America was the existential threat and enemy of one-world government after WWII.
The Islamists and radical Left have common cause to destroy American democracy. What both are too arrogant to understand is that the globalist elites who fund the Left consider both parties to be useful idiots whose sole purpose is to create overwhelming social chaos. The globalist elite have every intention of eliminating or enslaving both the Islamists and the Leftists as soon as the police force is internationalized. The globalist elites have no use for social chaos makers in their one-world government.
President Donald Trump is the only force standing between democracy and the return to a world of masters and slaves.
FYI says
Linda needs to wear the full burqa.She simply MUST cover up.
For allah hates a stupid muslima woman with a weird face.
It’s a sin against allah.
“For allah hatheth all women with facial hair and who listen to the song of a songstress;I will pour molten lead down the throat of such a muslima”
Actually that teaching of allah is made -up.
But then so is the koran.
Danusha Goska says
Please check out this Patheos article attempting to redefine jihad
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/askamuslim/2017/07/linda-sarsour-dreaded-j-word-jihad/
Jacqueleen says
We know who our friends are and we also know who is our enemy. WE ARE AT WAR WITH MUSLIMS AND THEIR DEMONIC POLITICAL CULT….Send them all back to the Middle East….evict them…they are not happy here. They are on a mission to quietly multiply and infiltrate (DAWA) all facets of our society…..the radicals are openly aggressive and violent. The moderates who appear to be “nice” “peaceful” people will show us just how nice and peaceful they are when they are in control, in power…..SEND OUR ENEMY TO THEIR OWN BACK YARDS AND GET THEM OUT OF OURS….WE DON’T WANT THEM HERE AND IN FACT, THEY ARE NOT ELIGIBLE TO BE HERE BECAUSE THEY DO NOT WANT TO BE AMERICAN AND ASSIMILATE INTO OUR CULTURE…THEY DO NOT BELONG HERE…GET THEM OUT..EVICT THEM NOW!!!!
Jacqueleen says
Thank you, Anni for speaking out…..May you be forever blessed with courage and God’s protection.