Back in January, Khan demanded the cancellation of Trump’s state visit to UK, stating that he was “quite clear, this ban is cruel, this ban is shameful, while this ban is in place we should not be rolling out the red carpet for President Trump.”
Instead Khan would rather see the red carpet rolled out for his jihadist chums:
Khan was reported by the UK’s Spectator to have known links to “extremists”: “Some of these associations date back to his time as a director of Liberty and a human rights lawyer – trying to get the UK to lift its ban on the American Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, who has described Jews as ‘blood-suckers’ and called Hitler ‘a very great man,’ and speaking at the same conference as Sajeel Abu Ibrahim, a member of the now proscribed Islamist organisation that trained the 7/7 bomber Mohammad Sidique Khan.
Yet Khan, as expected, played the usual victim card, stating: “If you somehow think it is not possible to be a Muslim and a proud westerner I am happy to disabuse you of that idea.” Given his unsavory company, how proud a Westerner can Khan really be? Shall we put this one to a vote?
“London Mayor Says There Should Be ‘No Red Carpet for Trump’, Claims President Insulted Muslims”, by Virginia Hale, Breitbart, July 18, 2017:
London Mayor Sadiq Khan has said it would not be “appropriate” for Donald Trump to make a state visit to the UK, claiming that Britons oppose the U.S. President’s policies.
“State visits are different from a normal visit and at a time when the President of the USA has policies that many in our country disagree with, I am not sure it is appropriate for our government to roll out the red carpet,’ the mayor of London told CNN.
Prime Minister Theresa May offered the U.S. leader a state visit to Britain seven days after his presidential inaugural, when she became the first foreign leader to visit the White House, which last week confirmed that the visit will take place in 2018.
Khan did not rule out meeting President Trump if given the opportunity, having lashed out at the U.S. premier on several occasions, telling CNN: “If someone has views that I think can be changed I am ready to play my role.
“If you somehow think it is not possible to be a Muslim and a proud westerner I am happy to disabuse you of that idea, whether you are a reporter for CNN or Donald Trump.”
Khan previously demanded Trump’s state visit be cancelled after the president slammed London’s Muslim mayor last month for telling residents of the city there is “no reason to be alarmed” following the London Bridge terror attack which killed seven and injured dozens more.
Speaking to Channel 4 News, Khan said the president’s policies — his then-proposed temporary travel ban on immigration from six nations in the Middle East and North Africa on grounds of securing the safety of American citizens — “go[es] against everything we stand for”.
On a tour of North America last September, two months before the presidential election, Khan said he was a “big fan” of Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, and claimed that Trump’s views on Islamic terror attacks “play into the hands” of the Islamic State……
Peter Buckley says
It is worth noting that when under pressure and in the public gaze, Sadiq Khan has renounced his muslim identity and declared himself “agnostic”. Watch what he says around 4 mins 30 secs:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5YQajsBFJMU
Keys says
Thanks for the video, Peter.
Kahn says “…I’m an agnostic…”
1. He could be telling the truth, for now.
2. He could be lying; very subtly, but pre-meditatively slipping that in, so as not to be associated with the evil many muslims do in the name of Allah.
3. He could be telling the truth about being an agnostic, but also is a “cultural” muslim for power and control purposes, and/or to support his cultural roots. (Similar to 25% of people identifying as Jewish do not “believe in God” according to a fairly recent US poll on religion.)
4. He could be lying as part of Islam’s infiltration plan to destroy us he West from within.
5. What else ?
But who cares why he said it, he still supports the Muslim cause – world domination.
His comment about disabusing those who think Islam is incompatible with the West is taqiya, and he knows it.
RodSerling says
He was responding directly to a question specifically on his position on the burqa. He said he was agnostic, which could mean he is agnostic on the issue. It’s not a precise use of the word agnostic, but it is a common usage.
Whatever Khan believes, he does appear to be acting on the side of the Muslim ummah and its goal of defeating and “humiliating” Western civilization.
Keys says
Could be he meant he was “agnostic on the issue”.
Good point.
Keys says
“Prime Minister Theresa May offered the U.S. leader a state visit to Britain seven days after his presidential inaugural…”
When a Muslim is Prime Minister, and this will happen if things do not change in Britain, the the Muslim mayor of London will not be so non-commital about the burqua issue.
mortimer says
I agree with RodSerling’s suggestion that Khan is ‘an agnostic’ about whether the full Islamic veil is required, but his wife wears a veil, so we can rule out the idea he isn’t a devout Muslim.
mortimer says
correction: actually Saadiya Khan (a lawyer) does not wear a veil. She may also be ‘an agnostic’.
Raja says
Mortimer,
With all respect to you..
The whole thing could be the business of taqqiya.
Veil or no veil Muslims all over shed crocodile tears when someone gets killed by a terrorist but always revere a terrorist whether slain and alive (in mosque)
Anti-jihad says
When you have to wonder what he really meant, he’s practising taqiyya.
Judge Smales says
Listen to how Khan’s voice pitch rises sharply when he says “I’m agnostic”.
DiMu says
It seems the Mayor of London is now running the UK, which gives us a taste, if you missed the impact of Obama, what life will be like under the Muslim minaret. It will be vile.
Jayell says
Correction. The current ‘Mayor of London’ would LIKE to run the UK and is currently throwing his weight around in anticipation to show everyone what a ‘Big Guy’ he is. Such is his bigotted lack of awareness that he fails to realise that the Englishman on the Clapham omnibus absolutely distrusts and detests ‘Big Guys’ of any ilk especially if one suspects that they’re not batting for one’s own side. Perhaps Kahn is banking on there not being many Englishmen left on the omnibuses in Clapham, or indeed anywhere else in London. He must have inside information since his father was a London his driver.
John Forbes says
AMAZING that the MUSLIM MAYOR of LONDON NOW RUNS the UK ?????
Where is TERESA the FOREVER UNREADY in this ?????
Has the HOUSE of COWARDS already been SURRENDERED & the CHAMBERS been CHANGED to PRAYER ROOMS with KIBLATS in the ceilings ???????
COWARDS in FULL VIEW !!! Those who would never surrender to HITLER – NOW BOW DOWN to ISLAM in their OWN CAPITAL CITY ????
Brian Hoff says
All the party in parliament want the PM to cancel the state visit of trump.
Wakeup says
Hiding his true colours will eventually become impossible for him, the voters of London really made a big mistake not bothering to vote. The Tory party also made a big mistake putting forward such a weak candidate to oppose him. I would suggest Jeremy Paxman next time.
pdxnag says
Would Mohammad get the red carpet? Which of his many violent deeds against non-Muslims makes him most worthy?
gravenimage says
The color would hide all the blood…
Westman says
..Khan said the president’s policies — his then-proposed temporary travel ban on immigration from six nations in the Middle East and North Africa on grounds of securing the safety of American citizens — “go[es] against everything we stand for”.
Hello, Bill Clinton-esque. It depends on what the definition of “we” is. Who, exactly, is “we”? Perhaps a better description comes from Pogo – “We have met the enemy and he is us.”
It is a sad fact that the UK has no Constitution document and so “everything we stand for” is a weak phrase.
This must have been the sorry state of Rome when its bureaucracy became infused with “barbarians”. The highly-talented, politically-placed among them likely refused to admit that some of their “brothers” had the intention of destroying the empire.
Khan’s message seems to be that a some mayhem from jihadists is just business as usual and should be tolerated – nothing to see here but some mutilated corpses and shattered lives. It seems, “We”, rule by statistics and polls and couldn’t care less about individuals.
Got it. Got Khan, got Jihad. Should we be rolling out the carpet for him?
John A. Marre says
The fact that he was elected means that England has no future.
gravenimage says
There are still some patriots in Britain.
utis says
Let the real Brits welcome Trump on their own. Sadiq is just a mayor. Vox populi vox dei.
HugoHackenbush says
Is it just me or does he resemble Ricardo Montalban? KHAANNN!!! Trump should send him the film.
Keys says
He resembles Khanan, the Barbarian.
Mike Proulx says
The London Mayor rolls the carpet out for murderers and not for Trump upside down world we live in. Speaks volumes about what he is all about.
mortimer says
Khan is a silent supporter of Islamic supremacism which is not a ‘Western’ idea. I don’t see how anyone can count Khan as a ‘proud Westerner’. To the contrary, he is an Islamic fifth columnist pretending to be Western.
carol says
Right, Khan reeks of a supremacist attitude and is not a Westerner but a usurper via a stacked deck. These people do not think as we do. As Stefan Molyneux might say, “we are individualists and they are collectivists”. The video link below provides food for thought on the matter of some primary differences between the Christian/Western mindset and the Islamic one:
The Seven Deadly Sins of Christianity and Islam, Compared
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXa80iqZQqI
gravenimage says
Excellent piece.
There is very little that is moral in Islam.
Even the reference to orphans is equivocal, since one thing a Muslim in charge of an orphan’s wealth can do is force the child to marry him.
One very small point–George W. Bush did not coin “Islam is a religion of peace”. It was a bit of Taqiyya from India in the 1930s–but it has been ludicrously popularized of late, and the first time most people in the West heard it was indeed from President Bush in the wake of 9/11.
Lucia Bartoli says
Last time I checked the evilcultist mayor is not the chief of British protocol. The only good thing I can say is that this satanic spawn will go straight to Hell. The only downside is: not soon enough
Bring back the Crusades!!
Paul F Austin says
I have said before and I repeat it here. They moved too soon! In their eagerness to subvert they have shown their hand. The public (man in the Clapham omnibus!) has fallen in to the meaning now of the Muslim Taqiyya system of lies to protect their actual fundamental Islamic beliefs. If you really WANT to learn the truth of Sadie Khan then promote a discussion between Sadie and Nigel – THEN you will discover how the weasel words of Khan can be destroyed. Will you see it happen? Sadie will run from it like he would a bacon sarnie. ‘Fraud’ positively OOZES out of him.
Jayell says
Khan….“If you somehow think it is not possible to be a Muslim and a proud westerner I am happy to disabuse you of that idea.”
Since Khan is not strictly a Westerner and does not seem to adhere properly to Western values, why is anyone supposed to give so much as an ounce of credence on the subject, about which is knowledge appears to be limited? Or on any subject? Who does he think he is? And if we’re talking about ‘disabusing’ people, perhaps Khan might care to consider the vast catalogue of ‘abuse’ (without the ‘dis’) that his co-religionists have inflicted on their British hosts in terms of their rampant disrespect and fraudulent exploitation of tolerance that they have received as well as the sheer criminality of their appalling behaviour.
Tom says
Never have liked Khan and what I have seen and heard from him in the last year has confirmed, for me at least, and despite his attempts to look otherwise, seems to promote Islam through his political position as Mayor of London.
kevin says
How can a simpleton like this become a PM, well in brain dead multicultural, Christianaphobe, anti freedom of speech Canada its not hard. We were stupid enough to vote in his idiot dad so why not a PM who supports jihadi warriors with Canadian tax dollars. I am so ashamed to be Canadian, I want to say I’m sorry to the widow of Kadrs killing and others wounded by this murderer. Please don’t take this as a sign that all Canadians are like Trudeau, he doesn’t represent most of Canada. He’s not even from Canada, he’s from Quebec. I hope he shot himself in the political foot,
gravenimage says
London’s Muslim mayor says there should be “no red carpet for Trump”: he insulted Muslims
……………………….
As Khan would have it, the prime focus of Britain should now be on kowtowing to Mohammedans.
As how did Trump “insult” Muslims? By trying to protect Americans from violent Jihadists. *Very* telling.
Malcolm Jackson says
“” If you want to piss Sadiq Kahn off, come along to this. Please share. You don’t have to be ex-forces.
Veterans against Terror. Parliament Square, Saturday, 5th August. Time to take back our country. See Veterans against Terrorism FB page.
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10155354994035242&set=a.10151794132320242.1073741825.727450241&type=3&theater “”.
Dacritic says
If I were Trump, I wouldn’t visit the UK. Who am I going to meet there? Khan? Theresa May? Alex Ferguson?
I wouldn’t be bothered. The UK can sink into the sea with its homegrown Islamic pests for all I care.
Brian Hoff says
trump was wrong to say anything about the mayor of London. UK police donot go around arm with gun like america police. People in the UK get scare when they see arm police.It only the racist islamoprobic rightwing who think overwise.
gravenimage says
“Brian Hoff”–really, “DefenderofIslam”–doesn’t believe that a “filthy Infidel” like Donald Trump should be allowed to say anything critical of any Muslim–after all, this is not allowed under Shari’ah law.
As for British police, he is thrilled that Jihadists have been able to slaughter as many people as they have in Britain, and yearns for the day when there are as many regular Jihad terror attacks in the US.
Likely that beheading of a British soldier in the street was a high point for him.