Of course she knows what every school of Sunni jurisprudence says about jihad. My latest in PJ Media:
The hijabbed feminist heroine Linda Sarsour is in the center of another controversy, and the Leftist establishment media is again rushing to defend her. This time, she called for “jihad” against President Trump.
The whole controversy, says Sarsour and her defenders, is just another indication of conservatives’ ignorance and “Islamophobia.”
But it isn’t: she really did incite violence.
Sarsour’s call for jihad came in the midst of her denunciation of the Trump administration at the annual convention of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) over the July 4 weekend. Sarsour said:
Why, sisters and brothers, why are we so unprepared? Why are we so afraid of this administration and the potential chaos that they will ensue on our community?
Invoking Muhammad, she said:
A word of truth in front of a tyrant ruler or leader, that is the best form of jihad.
She added:
I hope that when we stand up to those who oppress our communities, that Allah accepts from us that as a form of jihad, that we are struggling against tyrants and rulers not only abroad in the Middle East or the other side of the world, but here in these United States of America, where you have fascists and white supremacists and Islamophobes reigning in the White House.
She not only denounced Trump, but the idea that Muslims in America should assimilate:
Our number one and top priority is to protect and defend our communities. It is not to assimilate and to please any other people in authority … Our top priority, even higher than all those priorities, is to please Allah, and only Allah.
The establishment media rushed to defend her. Time explained: “Women’s March Organizer Linda Sarsour Spoke of ‘Jihad.’ But She Wasn’t Talking About Violence.” The Wrap published a piece titled: “3 Things Conservatives Got Very Wrong About Linda Sarsour’s Speech.” The Huffington Post gloated: “Linda Sarsour Said ‘Jihad’ In A Speech And Conservatives Freaked Out.” ThinkProgress mocked those ignorant, racist conservatives: “A Muslim activist referenced jihad and the right freaked out because they don’t know what it means.” CNN commentator Marc Lamont Hill tweeted: “The people disagreeing with @lsarsour clearly don’t understand what Jihad means.”
Sarsour herself took to the Washington Post to explain:
[I] sent not a call to violence, but a call to speak truth to power and to commit to the struggle for racial and economic justice.
…
I was speaking to an all-Muslim audience; as an American, I should be free to share and discuss scripture and teachings of my beloved Prophet.
Worst of all to her was the sullying of the reputation of “jihad”:
Most disturbing about this recent defamation campaign is how it is focused on demonizing the legitimate yet widely misunderstood Islamic term I used, “jihad,” which to majority of Muslims and according to religious scholars means “struggle” or “to strive for.” This term has been hijacked by Muslim extremists and right-wing extremists alike, leaving ordinary Muslims to defend our faith and in some cases silenced.
Linda Sarsour is not stupid, and likely knows what Islamic tradition actually has her “beloved Prophet” saying: “I have been made victorious through terror” (Bukhari 4:52.220). Muhammad told his followers to offer non-Muslims three choices: conversion to Islam; subjugation to Islamic hegemony, as signified by the payment of a poll tax (jizya); or death:
Fight against those who disbelieve in Allah. Make a holy war … When you meet your enemies who are polytheists, invite them to three courses of action. If they respond to any one of these you also accept it and withhold yourself from doing them any harm. Invite them to (accept) Islam; if they respond to you, accept it from them and desist from fighting against them. … If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the Jizya. If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah’s help and fight them. (Muslim 4294)
Islamic tradition also depicts Muhammad saying:
I have been commanded to fight against people so long as they do not declare that there is no god but Allah, and he who professed it was guaranteed the protection of his property and life on my behalf except for the right affairs rest with Allah. (Muslim 30)
If one does not profess belief in Allah, his property and life are not protected.
Sarsour also must know that there is an entire chapter of the Qur’an entitled “Booty,” or “The Spoils of War” (al-Anfal). What spoils ensue from “a word of truth spoken in front of a tyrant ruler or leader”? If jihad is simply a word of truth spoken in front of a tyrant, how is a Muslim supposed to make Jews and Christians “pay the jizya with willing submission and feel themselves subdued” (Qur’an 9:29)? If jihad means only to “struggle” or “strive,” why have millions of Muslims worldwide joined violent jihad groups?
Why are there any violent jihad groups at all? Why is this misunderstanding of jihad so widespread?
A professedly devout and knowledgeable Muslim, Linda Sarsour must know about all the many exhortations to violent in the Qur’an and Sunnah, and the doctrines of jihad warfare taught by all the schools of Sunni jurisprudence. When Sarsour says that “this term has been hijacked by Muslim extremists and right-wing extremists alike,” she is attempting not just to intimidate people into dismissing the idea that jihad involves violence for fear of allying with hated “right-wing extremists,” but also to liken foes of jihad terror to its proponents, thereby stigmatizing resistance to jihad terror as “far-right extremism.”
Of course, the centrality in Islamic law of jihad as warfare against unbelievers does not in itself mean that Sarsour was inciting violence against Trump. But Sarsour certainly knows what Muslims are doing in the name of jihad around the world today. When she says, “I hope that when we stand up to those who oppress our communities, that Allah accepts from us that as a form of jihad,” she may mean a non-violent standing up, but she has to know that when other Muslims who know the real meaning of jihad in Islam hear that, they will hear it as a call to violence….
Read the rest here.
Halal Bacon says
Why doesn’t she wear the full face eye slit get up?
WorkingClassPost says
I don’t usually go for those full face slitty things, but in her case it would be a big improvement.
They were probably invented for the likes of her!
KRJ says
The only improvement would be for her to GET THE HELL OUT and STAY OUT.
abad says
The niqab?
My guess is that this “feminist” does not feel it fits in with her brand of Islam. After all Sarsour is trying to make Islam as appealing as possible.
But unbeknownst to her, us smarter ones at JW know full well that real feminism and Islam are incompatible.
mortimer says
Threatening the President of the United States is a class E felony under United States Code Title 18, Section 871.[1][2][3] It consists of knowingly and willfully mailing or otherwise making “any threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon the President of the United States”.
Threatening the President is considered a political offense. Immigrants who commit this crime can be deported.
mortimer says
Threatening the President of the United States is a class E felony under United States Code Title 18, Section 871. It consists of knowingly and willfully mailing or otherwise making “any threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon the President of the United States”.
Threatening the President is considered a political offense. Immigrants who commit this crime can be deported.
Frank Cicero says
Can’t wait for the news headlines that states Miss Jihad is dead. I’m surprised she lasting this long and where is the FBI ??
balam says
Because ,this Muslim lady terrorist prefers ‘SLIT CONDOM’ over her face .She is a ‘SNAKE’ with her belly full of VENOM or something else.
infidel numero uno says
Why is she still walking around as free as a bird?
Godwin says
The CIA should get her arrested n charged.
Guest says
Trump has been going very easy on huge amounts of defamation, threats against him and fake news. He probably knows that the MSM would just love it if he took action against any of these idiots.
Or even smarter: give them enough rope to hang themselves?
Grendel's mother says
I would agree with you on that. Right now, it seems that this Sarsour creature is drunk on the media coverage she’s getting. Just let her yap on and on. She’s digging her own hole. Hell, she’s not even original. “Speak truth to power” indeed! How very 1960s!
Andy says
Linda Sarsour ENEMY OF HUMANITY!
Don Foss says
The Neo-Left appeasers are as well.
Diane Harvey says
Muslims say they won’t become Americans, and that’s exactly how they behave. Their loyalty is to their Allah and the ummah.. I heard Sarsour very clearly say they will not assimilate,“Our [Muslims’] No. 1 and top priority is to protect and defend our community; it is not to assimilate and to please any other people in authority. Our obligation is to our young people and to our women, [garbled] our women are protected in our community.”
You too can hear her say it at 08:36. And as she said this, she received applause. Applause!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ckQDoVe4JgE&t=18s
Yeah, they really want to become Americans. They really do!
And didya notice the use of the word “our” throughout her talk? “Our” as in Muslims’ interests to the exclusion of others. We’re catching on to your tricks and double-talk.
Only Muslims have no-go zones which they use as their base camps to plan and launch their attacks on us.
Shmooviyet says
“And didya notice the use of the word “our” throughout her talk?”
Yes, her message was loud & clear– I’m surprised she didn’t use that “1.7 billion worldwide” figure these supremacists are so fond of pitching in their attempts to intimidate.
I say again, this Sarsour madwoman is the real BIGOT who doesn’t give a rip for “women” or “communities”– she only wants bloody streets. And not just from some poor, shredded halal beasts.
Tom says
This cannot be emphasized enough and is constantly thrown into our faces, yet many refuse to see it.
“Assimilation is a crime against humanity. There is no moderate or immoderate Islam, Islam is Islam. The mosques are our barracks, The minorets are our bayonets, The cupolas our helmets, and the faithful our soldiers.” Tyyip Erdogan, President of Turkey
Mark Swan says
Absolutely Tom.
andra says
And you forgot: and democracy is the train we will use for the take-over.
It is always the same. Muslims Caim they are victims but in reality they are the ones that demand, demand and demand until all other cultures will have disappeared.
And as resistance grows al over the West against Islamisation the demands get more and more aggrssive and the take-over is speeding up with every day.
Sven Oljaski says
This is true. The Taqiya is so thick it’s sickening. We have a DUTY to become educated about the Quran, and SWIFTLY. Throw out the Muslim school textbook moderators that subdue their filthy lies. Refuse to entertain anything they they say until they answer the questions without attempting to twist and side step them. FORCE THEM like all the rest of us to live within OUR LAWS. That means they must practice their law of DARURA which states they MUST obey the laws and customs of the land in which they inhabit (until such time that they can practice jihad). The Burkah is a form of forcing Sharia upon us. Fine, wear it at home, but in airports and other sensitive places, there are laws that require ID. The west is so congested with their own self involvement that they cannot see the snake slipping in and preparing to strangle. They think the bites they take from the snake (of Islam) are the love taps from misunderstandings. There is only ISLAMO-IGNORANCE. End the Ignorance, and end Islam. It’s a cult that has become far too rampant and needs to be stopped for its slavery, torture, rape and human trafficking and murder. There’s a reason whey there are no Muslims in Star Trek. They can’t exist in a society that believes in human dignity, collaboration, decency, and progress.
Rosewood11 says
Yes, please do arrest her!!!
And when Madonna, Ashley Judd, Miley Cyrus, etc. come out and say this is islamophobia because she didn’t say anything worse than they did themselves, you can throw their *sses in the slammer along with her!!!
Law enforcement, we’re with you and honor you, but for God’s sake grow a pair, and arrest these people!!!
Buford says
Lock the Bitch up & throw the key away
Kevin says
Linguistically, the Arabic word “jihad” means a striving or a struggle, no one really disputes that fact. Do they?
But Ms. Sarsour was at the ISNA convention, and clearly seemed to be speaking as a believing pious Muslim in her speech, and not, per se, as a linguist. So that alone, in and of itself, is more than reason enough to examine the theocratic component of “jihad”. Leading one to seek clarification and further context of the word, examining the religious constructs, and cultural concepts behind it. Sources that can be used to help us accomplish that task are dictionaries, encyclopedias, and research universities. Jihad is also found clearly described in codified Islamic sources, Quran, hadith, legal text sharia/ fiqh (the reliance of the traveller), and various religious discourses published by widely recognized religious authorities within the community of belief itself.
Definition of jihad Webster’s dictionary
1: a holy war waged on behalf of Islam as a religious duty; also: a personal struggle in devotion to Islam especially involving spiritual discipline
2: a crusade for a principle or belief
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/jihad
Definition of jihad Oxford dictionary
1 A struggle or fight against the enemies of Islam.
‘he declared a jihad against the infidels
’mass noun ‘the importance of jihad as a uniting force’
1.1also greater jihad The spiritual struggle within oneself against sin.
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/jihad
The ” personal struggle” or “greater jihad” is from a hadith classified as Maudu (fabricated, forged) and as such, it can not be found in any of the “Al-Sihah al-Sittah”, which translates as “The authentic six” in Sunni Islam.
https://kpr37.newsvine.com/_news/2017/07/09/37941877-linda-sarsours-call-for-a-jihad-in-a-religious-context-as-opposed-to-a-linguistic-context
Mark Swan says
If this is such a benign word, why does it need these concocted defenses of it ?
It does not have a past or present better meaning, that stands out, more than warfare.
Islamic Jihad has amounted to more than 31,163 attacks since September 11, 2001,
the numbers of individuals killed and wounded is in the hundreds of thousands.
The number murdered in Islamic Jihad on September 11, 2001 was nearly 3,000.
The tens of thousands killed and wounded in two wars in Muslin countries, the
Multiple trillions of dollars, the total and absolute disruption of our way of life,
our safety, our sense of well being, our economy, our entire world has
been effected by Jihad.
It is known all too well what Jihad means to hundreds of millions of
the followers of Allah.
Using this word so flagrantly, by an anyone that wants to push it as far as it can
be pushed, may actually get this word examined, helping people to realize it means
only bad things for anyone it is used against, in this case the President of the United
States is singled out, along with his administration—it should be taken seriously.
gravenimage says
Good points, Mark.
Mark Swan says
Thank you gravenimage.
Jean Terry says
If she thinks Mr. Trump is a tyrant, she should move to Saudi Arabia, Iran or North Korea, etc. She would not even be able to speak in those countries. I do not get how she can say such crazy things as she is intelligent and must know that this is not true. I wish she would move to Saudi Arabia or elsewhere. She is spreading poison. But, this is a free country.
Tom says
And that is why the likes of this woman and many of her Islamic ilk are here, to use our freedom of speech and assembly against us in order to bring down our society.
Our freedoms are becoming our Achilles Heel
Jean Terry says
They are indeed. We conservatives understand this but it is the liberals who do not face this fact. We are certainly in a war right now between honest and right and dishonesty and evil. Or against Satan.
WorkingClassPost says
Looks like there’s something in this business about being ‘culturally incompetent’.
The term was made for her.
JawsV says
Her surname “Sarsour” means “Cockroach” in Arabic.
mohamonator says
“mohamedan feminist”, eh? Wonder how long she would last in Pakistan? Or Afghanistan? Or Iraq? Or Syria? Or…..? Got a stopwatch?
Jean Terry says
Isn’t that the truth. She wants to destroy what she has here for a misguided belief system.
Carolyne says
Or Detroit.
Georg says
Islam is sooooooooooooooo progressive. Didn’t you know?
Islamic Mirror says
72 Virgins , 28 Boys and 80,000 servants
Muslims are motivated to terrorism because the Quran tells them that fighting non-believers is a duty of every Muslim and the only way to be certain of going to heaven to enjoy untold sensual pleasures is to die fighting in the cause of Allah.
If they can make it to heaven, one of the rewards all Muslims are promised is 72 virgins. The number of virgins is not specified in Quran, it comes from a quotation of Muhammad recorded in one of the lesser known Hadith. (“Hadith” is an Arabic word meaning traditions. After Muhammad’s death, several collections of his deeds and sayings were assembled. These collections are called Hadith and form the second most authoritative document is Islam, right after the Quran.)
VIRGINS (Houris):
Mohammed knew that sex would sell very well among the group of his followers who were motivated to fight battles by the promise of sex slaves and booty. By constantly emphasizing to his followers that they would get untouched virgins in Paradise, Mohammed is clearly expressing his “high” opinion of the institution of marriage and his fairness to women. Once the followers go to heaven, they can conveniently ditch their wives for the fresher and more pleasurable sexual encounters with ‘Houris’ (beautiful virgins). The poor wives who gave up their virginity for the pleasure of their husbands do not get anything. But wait, Allah is all merciful! He gives the wives the rare honour of watching their husbands deflower those 72 Houris (virgins) and 28 young pre-pubescent boys.
The specific Hadith in which the number of virgins is specified is Hadith Al-Tirmidhi in the Book of Sunah (volume IV, chapters on The Features of Paradise as described by the Messenger of Allah, chapter 21, About the Smallest Reward for the People of Paradise. The same hadith is also quoted by Ibn Kathir in his Quranic commentary (Tafsir) of Surah Al-Rahman:
“The Prophet Muhammad was heard saying: ‘The smallest reward for the people of paradise is an abode where there are 80,000 servants and 72 wives, over which stands a dome decorated with pearls, aquamarine, and ruby, as wide as the distance from Al-Jabiyah [a Damascus suburb] to Sana’a [Yemen].”
(QURAN 37:40-4 : “In the Gardens of Paradise, Facing one another on thrones, Round them will be passed a cup of pure wine; White, delicious to the drinkers, Neither they will have any kind of hurt, abdominal pain, headache, or sin, nor will they suffer intoxication from it. And with them will be chaste females, restraining their glances, with wide and beautiful eyes.”
(QURAN 44:51-55): “Verily! The righteous will be in Paradise. Among Gardens and Springs; Dressed in fine silk and also in thick silk, facing each other, and We shall marry them to Houris with wide, lovely eyes.”
(QURAN 52: 17-20): “Verily, for those who fear Allah there will be Gardens in Paradise, filled with Delight. Enjoying in that which their Lord has bestowed on them, and the fact that their Lord saved them from the torment of the blazing Fire. The Lord will say: ‘Eat and drink with happiness because of what you used to do’. They will recline with ease on thrones arranged in ranks. And We shall marry them to Houris with wide lovely eyes.”
(QURAN 55:54-59): “Reclining upon the couches lined with silk brocade, and the fruits of the Gardens will be near at hand. Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you deny? Wherein will be those houris, restraining their glances upon their husbands, whom no man or jinn has opened their hymens with sexual intercourse before. Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you deny? In beauty they are like rubies and coral. Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you deny?”
(QURAN 55:70-77): “Therein gardens will be fair wives good and beautiful; Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you deny? Houris restrained in pavilions; Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you deny? Whom no man has opened their hymens with sexual intercourse before. Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you deny? Reclining on green cushions and rich beautiful mattresses. Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you deny?”
(QURAN 56:37-40): “…We created the houris and made them virgins, loving companions for those on the right hand….”
(QURAN 78:31-34): “As for the righteous, they shall surely triumph. Theirs shall be gardens and vineyards, and high-bosomed virgins for companions: a truly overflowing cup.”
Two points need to be noted. First, there is no mention anywhere in the Quran of the actual number of virgins available in paradise, and second, the dark-eyed damsels are available for all Muslims, not just martyrs. It is in the Islamic Traditions that we find the 72 virgins in heaven specified: in a Hadith (Islamic Tradition) collected by Al-Tirmidhi (died 892 AD) in the Book of Sunan (volume IV, chapters on The Features of Paradise as described by the Messenger of Allah [Prophet Muhammad], chapter 21, About the Smallest Reward for the People of Paradise, (Hadith 2687). The same hadith is also quoted by Ibn Kathir (died 1373 CE ) in his Quranic commentary (Tafsir) of Surah Al-Rahman (55), verse 72: “The Prophet Muhammad was heard saying: ‘The smallest reward for the people of paradise is an abode where there are 80,000 servants and 72 wives, over which stands a dome decorated with pearls, aquamarine, and ruby, as wide as the distance from Al-Jabiyyah [a Damascus suburb] to Sana’a [Yemen]’.”
An Hamas spokesman correctly uses the word martyr (shahid) and not suicide bomber, since those who blow themselves up almost daily in Israel and those who died on September 11 were dying in the noblest of all causes, Jihad, which is an incumbent religious duty, established in the Quran and in the Traditions as a divine institution, and enjoined for the purpose of advancing Islam. While suicide is forbidden, martyrdom is everywhere praised, welcomed, and urged: “By the Being in Whose Hand is my life, I love that I should be killed in the way of Allah; then I should be brought back to life and be killed again in His way…”; “The Prophet said, ‘Nobody who enters Paradise will ever like to return to this world even if he were offered everything, except the martyr who will desire to return to this world and be killed 10 times for the sake of the great honour that has been bestowed upon him’.” [Sahih Muslim, chapters 781, 782, The Merit of Jihad and the Merit of Martyrdom.]
Eternal erection and virginity
Modern apologists of Islam try to downplay the evident materialism and sexual implications of such descriptions, but, as the Encyclopaedia of Islam says, even orthodox Muslim theologians such as al Ghazali (died 1111 AD) and Al-Ash’ari (died 935 AD) have “admitted sensual pleasures into paradise”. The sensual pleasures are graphically elaborated by Al-Suyuti (died 1505 AD), Quranic commentator and polymath. He wrote: “Each time we sleep with a houri we find her virgin. Besides, the penis of the Elected never softens. The erection is eternal; the sensation that you feel each time you make love is utterly delicious and out of this world and were you to experience it in this world you would faint. Each chosen one [ie Muslim] will marry seventy [sic] houris, besides the women he married on earth, and all will have appetising vaginas.”
BOYS.
Homosexuality was and is widely practised in Islamic countries. To please the homosexuals among his followers he promised them pre-pubescent boys in Paradise. So after committing plunder, loot, rape and murder in this life, the followers of Islam get “rewarded” by untouched virginal youths who are fresh like pearls.
(QURAN 52:24): “And there will go round boy-servants of theirs, to serve them as if they were preserved pearls.”
(QURAN 56:17): “They will be served by immortal boys.”
(QURAN 76:19): “And round about them will (serve) boys of everlasting youth. If you see them, you would think them scattered pearls.”
It is common in Arabic poetry to glorify homosexuality, take their famous poet Abu Nuwas:
O the joy of sodomy!
So now be sodomites, you Arabs.
Turn not away from it–
therein is wondrous pleasure.
Take some coy lad with kiss-curls
twisting on his temple
and ride as he stands like some gazelle
standing to her mate.
A lad whom all can see girt with sword
and belt not like your whore who has
to go veiled.
Make for smooth-faced boys and do your
very best to mount them, for women are
the mounts of the devils
It seems then that this promise of sensual happiness and sexual bliss in paradise, not only is the motivator for the Islamic terrorists but it may even be a motivator for our secular evolutionists to join the rank of Islam.
Jerry says
Rest assured when Sarsour is talking about jihad against the president she’s not talking about ones struggle to lose weight or overcome drugs. The ultimate jihad “struggle” for muslims has always been to overcome the unbelief of others, and historically, acts of terror and murder have been employed to achieve that end. It certainly explains why so many muslims are committing terror these days. Sarsour is a muslim, so we can safely assume her political discourse is ensconced in the supremacist ideology of islam. So it would be childishly naive to dismiss her harsh words as merely a call to angelic spiritual betterment. We all know what she meant because she’s speaking as a muslim to muslims. And I think we know the kind of fanaticism she’s trying to whip up, and in light of the bloody facts I think we’re safe in assuming it probably ain’t of the peaceful kind.
If any attempt against President Trump’s welfare is made then people like Sarsour should be first on the list for investigation. Her use of the term “jihad” in a political context against the president strikes me as a veiled threat or worse. She speaks of “truth” as a kind of jihad. But to faithful muslims “truth” means I am worthy of death for my unbelief as their god teaches. I don’t trust Sarsours “truth.” I trust the truth embodied in our constitution and its ideals of equality and freedom for all. Islam has never really been about “truth.” It’s more about violent men wanting to control and abuse others in the name of god. That ain’t my truth and it never will be.
Voytek Gagalka says
She knows very well and she means precisely what she means: Yes, VIOLENT jihad against non-believers, counting only on widespread ignorance about nature of Islam plus intimidation of so called “Islamophobia” to laugh straight into faces of all those ignorant “infidels” (kuffar). I don’t doubt even for a moment that she means that form violent jihad when she talks about it. That is open declaration of war! But who will dare to challenge her and throw her into the dungeon as an enemy of the state? WHO?
gravenimage says
Robert Spencer: Yes, Linda Sarsour Did Incite Violence Against President Trump
…………………
Of course she did, the evil bint.
Georg says
Not even a “dog whistle”, just a call to violence — aka “jihad” — which is violent violence. I’ve been on this rock long enough to know what “jihad” is.
mortimer says
Threatening the President of the United States is a class E felony under United States Code Title 18, Section 871. It consists of knowingly and willfully mailing or otherwise making “any threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon the President of the United States”.
Threatening the President is considered a political offense. Immigrants who commit this crime can be deported.
Yokel says
Just out of curiosity, is she right to use as her “witnessing finger” the index finger of the hand she wipes her behind with after going to the toilet? I would have thought it should have been her clean hand.
John A. Marre says
Yuck! She is ugly! I’ve seen prettier faces in pig farms.
davej says
“Our beloved Prophet”
Oh you mean that self declared hater, sadistic murderer, thief and evil pedophile?
Linda Sarsour is insane.
Will says
There is barking-neurotic & then there is Linda Sarsour , exemplifying the built up of a feral anger of being duped in believing in a failed totalitarian ideology, that has damaged her to the core. her rage is palpable …… she is damaged goods ! Her ability to experience sexual pleasure likely sliced from her ….
That pathologically, demented & devout muslima makes Abū Bakr al-Baghdadi seem like a pragmatic progressive ……..
Hindu American says
Aha! Invoking Muhammad, she said:”A word of truth in front of a tyrant ruler or leader, that is the best form of jihad.”
Ironical if mo actually said that. If mo did say that, then why do the muslims get all riled up if us islamophobes utter “a word of truth”?. Can’t stomach that jihad, eh?
Mark Swan says
I would think everyone who ever told the class A tyrant Muhammed any truth to his face,
learned the true meaning of Jihad, quick enough.
Eagle Nest says
Question: Should Linda Sarsour be charged with a hate crime?
Richie says
you know the rules, Muslims are always victims- even when they rape and kill
Guest says
Let her carry on: the WaPo’s best liked comments show that people aren’t buying it. True liberals are commenting like this: “To be blunt, she’s a fraud. As a liberal, I’m not falling for it.”
Guest says
Another good one:
” As a liberal I am astounded that other liberals are silent on the cognitive disconnect of welcoming people in to our societies who hate and literally kill gays, Christians, women, apostates, and really anybody who disagrees with their regressive theology. “
Jean Terry says
It certainly is amazing to me. Not to mention that liberal feminists have nothing to say about how women are treated in the Muslim world.
gravenimage says
Great to see, Guest.
Mark Swan says
If being liberal means broad-minded, tolerant of different views and standards of
behavior in others, generous, and considerate.
I admire and respect anyone who strives to live by those ways.
Sadly, that is not its standard usage anymore.
gravenimage says
Yes–I considered myself liberal for many years. It is only in recent years that it has come to mean anything *but* liberal.
Mark Swan says
Yes–many good words have become the exclusive term for questionable groups.
gravenimage says
True.
R Cole says
Linda Sarsour has the Left wrapped around her ISIS finger.
Don’t think she could do anything wrong, in their opinion.
She could say, ‘I love ISIS!’ The only response from the Left would be, ‘is expressing love for IS racist? Okay, then, you’re a bigot and an Islamophobe!!’
::
Sarsour looks to be a confidence trickster. When you’re being suckered like the Left, you might see red flags, but to entertain any doubt about the person is to disbelieve everything.
Linda, how many Muslim women are named Linda? Diabolical!
The only these guys want from the Left is Islamic law. Notice, the Left gets the Muslims who want Islamic law. And on the right, there are the Muslim reformers and the former Muslims who are opposed to Sharia law. But no one can tell the Left, they’re convinced this is all about racism. That this is a battle between Islamic factions, between the maintenance of liberty and an illiberal theocracy, hadn’t occurred to them.
WorkingClassPost says
Another case of Trumpophobia:-
https://primaryaccount.blogspot.co.uk/2017/07/us-sickness-of-mind.html
Joe says
“Why, sisters and brothers, why are we so unprepared? Why are we so afraid of this administration and the potential chaos that they will ensue on our community?”
Because Trump and his admin is doing exactly the right step, one after another, to defeat this evil!
Pong says
In present climate of change, people like her is a blessing for America. 6 months ago on JW I made a prediction that the domocrats will become kind of a regional party. The last hose elections supported my view. In the next presidential election it will be even more so, as greens will take more votes than they did in the last election and those votes will come from the democrats. The left is making a big mistake praising Linda. Her message might go well with moslems, but they vote democrats anyway. Many democrats will not be comfortable with her standing for sharia and not to assimilate. She is a foreign body and a malignant one for everyone to see.
Michael Copeland says
“Where is your weapon? Where is your weapon? Come to the jihad!”
Omar Bakri
Linda Goudsmit says
Linda Sarsour: LOCK HER UP! Linda Sarsour, the darling of the Islamist/Leftist consortium of anarchists currently trying to overthrow the United States government is at it again. In a stunning seditious address to the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) she unapologetically and emphatically called on Muslims to wage jihad in America against duly elected President Trump and the White House by saying:
“We (Muslims) are struggling against tyrants and rulers not only abroad . . . but here in the United States of America, where you have fascists and white supremacists and Islamophobes reigning in the White House. . . . Our number one and top priority is to protect and defend our community. It is not to assimilate and to please any other people in authority. And our top priority . . . is to please Allah, and only Allah.”
Linda Sarsour is openly fomenting insurrection and allegiance to Allah in pursuit of the Islamic goal to re-establish the Islamic caliphate and impose sharia law worldwide. Why hasn’t Linda Sarsour been arrested and charged with treason??
It seems the noisy Brooklyn born Palestinian-American Muslim needs a refresher course in American democracy. In America we are still ruled by secular American laws and the United States Constitution. We are not ruled by religious Islamic sharia law. So, if Linda Sarsour prefers an Islamic government she is free to live in any one of a number of Islamic theocracies in the world. The tolerance that American democracy has extended to multiculturalism reaches its tipping point when Islamists, whether foreign born or natural born like Sarsour, demand that America submit to religious sharia law and become dhimmis in their own country.
All across Europe the consequences of Western nations tolerating intolerant Muslims are manifest. It is cultural suicide to import masses of Muslim immigrants with hostile cultural norms. It is a fiction of the Left that Muslim immigrants will assimilate. To the contrary, the mass immigration of Muslims into Europe and America is HIJRAH – a form of population jihad that is endorsed, encouraged, and rewarded by Islamic sharia law. Sharia compliant protesters like Sarsour are advancing Islam in America in an effort to replace American democracy with religious sharia law. Her allegiance is to Allah and not to America – she is an enemy of the state.
Again I ask, Why hasn’t Linda Sarsour been arrested and charged with treason??
Immigration without assimilation is invasion. Americans have been duped by the left-wing liberals and the colluding mainstream media into believing that the worldwide refugee “crisis” is a humanitarian calamity. The only humanitarian calamity is the stunning willingness of the West to be duped, invaded, submit to Islam, and become dhimmis in their own countries.
How did America reach the point where an Islamist like Linda Sarsour can publicly address a Muslim group also seeking to conquer the West and openly call for jihad against the President of the United States without being arrested and charged with treason??
The answer is that for two generations Americans have been indoctrinated in left-wing liberal tenets of political correctness, moral relativism, and historical revisionism brought to America courtesy of Tavistock Institute in a deliberate effort to destroy American democracy and American dominance in the world.
Since the end of WWII the globalist elite of the world have been colluding to internationalize the world and create an unimpeded global marketplace to enrich themselves and further their goal of imposing one-world government. Described unapologetically by aristocrat Lord Bertrand Russell sixty-five years ago in his 1952 book The Impact of Science on Society, one-world government is a binary socio-political system of elite rulers and an enslaved population who serve them. The United States emerged from WWII as the dominant military, political, and economic force in the world – invincible, impenetrable, and impregnable – and the single greatest obstacle to one-world government.
The destruction of America was impossible from the outside in – it would have to be accomplished from the inside out. Tavistock Institute was exported to the United States from England to accomplish psychologically what was impossible to accomplish militarily – the destruction of America from within. Islamists were exposed as having the same goal in papers found in the home of Ismael Elbarasse, a founder of the Dar Al-Hijrah mosque in Falls Church, Virginia, during a 2004 search:
“The process of settlement is a ‘Civilization-Jihadist Process’ with all the word means. The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers…”
Ex-president Barack Obama became a radical Leftist tutored in the value of community organizing by radical socialist Saul Alinsky. Obama entered the world stage as the face of globalism and an internationalized world. His disingenuous campaign of hope and change were code words for destroying American democracy and replacing it with socialism. Hillary Clinton, also a radical left-wing socialist follower of Saul Alinsky, was to be Obama’s third term.
The destruction was envisioned sequentially: Public indoctrination toward collectivism through education and mainstream media -> break down of established morality and cultural norms of behavior -> create social chaos -> impose martial law -> impose socialism -> internationalize police force -> impose one-world government.
Independence of any kind, particularly critical thinking skills, poses a threat to tyranny – the goal was complete passivity and dependence upon the government because a dependent population is easily manipulated. This explains Obama’s anti-American policies that crushed the economy, weakened the military, incentivized government assistance, and indoctrinated American children toward socialism. It also explains Hillary Clinton’s stunning remark that “we (Democratic Party) need an unaware and compliant population.”
The Obama Leftists and the Islamists joined forces to bring down America from within – and then came President Donald Trump who shocked the Left by beating Hillary in the presidential election. President Trump is an unapologetic American patriot who believes in American sovereignty, American exceptionalism, and making America great again. He is the existential threat and enemy of one-world government today just as America was the existential threat and enemy of one-world government after WWII.
The Islamists and radical Left have common cause to destroy American democracy. What both are too arrogant to understand is that the globalist elites who fund the Left consider both parties to be useful idiots whose sole purpose is to create overwhelming social chaos. The globalist elite have every intention of eliminating or enslaving both the Islamists and the Leftists as soon as the police force is internationalized. The globalist elites have no use for social chaos makers in their one-world government.
President Donald Trump is the only force standing between democracy and the return to a world of masters and slaves.
Mark Swan says
Linda Goudsmit, thank you for what you wrote here.
Peter says
Two words summarize her agenda:
SEDITION and TREASON.
zoniek says
Guess she is pissed off that she didn’t get to attend iftar at the WhiteHouse this year.
nabi ZK (pbum)
Don Carlos says
The hypocrisy of “the left” in labeling any dissent against their orthodoxy and agenda as “fascists” is boundless. This was particularly evident after viewing “Nazi Jihad” on the A.H.C. (“American Heroes Channel”) cable channel on 7 / 10. One of the major takeaways from this production is the role of Otto Skorzeny, a.k.a. “Hitler’s Commando”, in establishing what we now know as “Islamic” terrorism and coordinating terrorist attacks against Israel well into the 1960’s. Among others, both Saddam Hussein and Moammar Khaddafi were taught directly by Otto Skorzeny early in their career trajectories. Of particular interest to followers of Jihad Watch, this production deserves much wider dissemination as an antidote to the C.A.I.R. approved talking points about ‘the religion of peace” being taught in the public school systems nationwide.
Victory in Christ says
Clearly what Linda said was a call to violence against the Unites States by way of The President. This is a felony as others have posted. When Nancy Griffin held up a plastic head of Trump there was no “intellectual debate.” Linda is someone that firmly stands against our nation and is instructing others not to assimilate, to resist my nation. This speech of hers needs to be focused on even more so than Nancy’s actions. The non-fake conservative media need to keep after her and demand an accounting. So far much of what I see is how she is the victim as she explains it. Islam keeps muddying the debates with cries of racism, bigots and anything else they can throw to shout down the truth about Islam and the plans for the United States. As Mohammed did state he is victorious through terror. Why has this women not been charged with sedition? I should be hearing mention of deportation.
Jacqueleen says
I agree. EVERY MUSLIM MUST BE EVICTED AND SENT BACK TO THE MIDDLE EAST…ISOLATED FROM SOCIETY. This is the only way to deal with our enemy. Inviting them to live in our neighborhoods is INSANE. ISOLATION IS KEY. THEY MUST BE EVICTED AND BANNED FROM RE-ENTRY AND THAT GOES FOR AMERICAN MUSLIMS AS WELL. They do not deserve to live in a civilized nation but rather in a desert in tents and caves where the uncivilized belong. Let Saudi finance their multiplied families (DAWA) in their own land…..not ours! Let them fight among themselves and not kill their benefactors.
Enough is enough! WE ARE SICK AND TIRED OF POLITICAL CORRECTNESS. EVICT THE LEFT ALONG WITH THE MUSLIMS.
ron says
whats happening on the planet is beyond diabolical. islam will stop at nothing. rev. 20 verse 4. i saw the souls of those who had been beheaded for the testimony of jesus and for the word of god. if you watched the news in the last few yrs. its clear to see who’s cutting the heads off.