Britain already has a serious enough problem with Muslims being unable to assimilate, Muslims from Britain fighting for the Islamic State and then returning home, the large-scale cover-up of sex assaults by Muslim rape gangs (otherwise known as “grooming” gangs), and Sharia courts returning women to abusive husbands. Now Britain is headed for even more trouble.
The UK will struggle to control immigration after Brexit as it does not have the capacity to measure numbers arriving, leaving, and staying, a parliamentary report has acknowledged.
But the problem is not Brexit. What Britain needs is strong leadership that will close Sharia courts, tighten immigration policy, and stop kowtowing to Muslims and treat them as equals.
“Parliament Report Admits Migrant Data ‘Woefully Inadequate’ and ‘Flawed’”, by Liam Deacon, Breitbart, July 22, 2017:
The UK will struggle to control immigration after Brexit as it does not have the capacity to measure numbers arriving, leaving, and staying, a parliamentary report has acknowledged.
The report, by the House of Lords Economic Affairs committee, blasted the insufficient information collection, and called for a comprehensive overhaul of the current immigration system, calling it “woefully inadequate”.
The document slams the “flawed” sample surveys used to calculate net migration, which means ministers risks formulating policy “in the dark”.
“The available data on migration are extremely poor. They fail to provide an accurate number of migrants entering or leaving the country or the number of migrants in work”, it reads.
In May 2016, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) was forced to admit European Union (EU) immigration into Britain was nearly 1.5 million higher as previously thought.
The number had been underestimated after “short term” migrants were not properly included in estimations….
Halal Bacon says
They only count the when they go BOOM!
Aardvark says
mohammedans are not UNABLE to integrate – they just refuse to do so.
Lynn says
Back in 1972 my husband and I along with another couple visited Britain on vacation. My husband was working but I had just finished graduate school and we didn’t have much money. I was admitted without any questions but my husband was stopped by immigration and was required to show the officer his travelers’ checks and his return plane ticket before being allowed to enter the country. We all teased him by saying that he must look like a deadbeat but most likely it was because he was a naturalized US citizen born in Eastern Europe while the rest of us were born in the US. How times have changed! Apparently Britain will let anyone in without regard to whether they can support themselves as long as they are Muslim.
gravenimage says
My husband was an exchange student at Oxford in the 1980s before we met. He had to prove that he was enrolled at university, that he maintained minimum grades, and that he had the means to support himself while there.
He stayed on another six months after graduation–he had to prove he had a job, and that his employers were satisfied with his work. When he changed jobs a couple of months in, he had to produce written letters from both his old and his new employers, and was told that not more than a week could elapse between employment. He had to report when he moved, and make sure authorities had his current address. He had to maintain a clean record. Had he committed a crime–even most low level misdemeanors–he would have been immediately deported.
He actually had to check in at the police station every week, and would have been put on the next plane for America if he had missed a check in.
To say times have changed is an understatement…
gravenimage says
UK Parliament report admits data on Muslim migrants “woefully inadequate” and “flawed”
…………………….
No sh*t. Just glad to see someone in Parliament noticing this.
John Forbes says
The MUSLIM CHILD RAPING industry is another HORRIBLE illustration of what Governments with the help of Councils & the POLICE will do to protect a failed ideology they implimented with NO VOTE & NO CONSULTATION & now have no idea as to what to do to control this & all they can come up with is go AFTER those who expose the MESS !! Robinson & Watson & Anne Marie Waters to name 3 !
The FOLLOWERS state on the STREETS in full VIEW that DEMOCRACY is IMMORAL & that MUSLIMS will not integrate with the KUFAR but they will gleefully rape their CHILDREN !
The DIDSBURY MOSQUE regularly hands out leaflets RUBBISHING BRITISH DEMOCRACY & the POLITICIANS protect their right to do this & the CLERGY ( Archbishop) actually suggested that SHARIA be allowed ????
IDIOTS at the TOP all over the place !!
The Arrogance of the ELITE & the POLITICIANS in this is a DISGRACE !
stan lee says
The present P.M. of UK, P.M. May, was the high government officer where “the buck stopped” concerning the underwriting of Muslims allowed entry into UK. She undersigned the orders before becoming the UK P.M.
Either she threw caution to the winds, in an attempt to maintain political correctness with her “Labour Party” political adversaries, or she is far less conservative about immigration than imagined.
Once again, P.C. pressure from the EU, plus an overall P.C. indoctrination of the entire UK government, regardless of political party, plus little to no resistance from the UK public, is what positions U.K. politics in its unenviable condition today. They have all fallen for the Islamic “Trojan Horse” presented to them.
gravenimage says
Theresa May was “vigilant” about keeping Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller out of Britain, though…
Anne Smith says
Stan Lee you are too kind about May. She is known by many of us as Sharia May and has been assiduous in kowtowing to the Saudis.
Under her rule as Home Secretary she enabled Sharia Courts so much that they quadrupled in numbers. She has done nothing to ensure the rights of women who have been double crossed by these “courts”.
She believes Islam has cultural relativism with Christianity. She also treasures trade with Saudia Arabia and fawns over the Saudis.
She is either stupid woman or a devious uncaring bitch who knows which side her personal bread is buttered. Either way she is a rotten PM.
Barguest says
Agreed about Teresa May, she’s a hopeless PM. But she is, at least, the lesser of two evils despite her manifold faults. Had Labour won Corbyn would’ve been even worse, so I think we dodged a bullet on that one. Or perhaps I should say we only got hit with a .22 and not a .45 hollow point.
But I do wonder if we’ll ever again see a leader of the calibre of Churchill or Thatcher. Or are those days behind us never to return?
Strong Aingek says
Decrepit Governance when we are engaged in a War, which Islam, via the #OIC declared on 05 November 2002 … Treason is as treason does ..
Westman says
“…(EU) immigration into Britain was nearly 1.5 million higher as previously thought.” “short term” migrants were not properly included in estimations….
Short timers? Another cover-up euphemism for “It’s out of control. We don’t know who they are, where they are, or, if they will ever leave.”
Stately succoring socialist suckers succombing senilely.
John A. Marre says
The border controls are really working well for Spencer and Savage. The UK keeps those two out, but freely and willingly admits millions of people whose sworn ideology is incompatible with what the UK was.
Guest says
Look Brexit is helping England already
Jayell says
“What Britain needs is strong leadership…….and stop kowtowing to Muslims and treat them as equals…”
But the UK Government is not treating muslims just as ‘equals’, more like SUPERIORS, hence all the kowtowing. They are (I believe) only about a 4-5% segment of the population yet they are apparently being given all the special consideration and deference normally due to a much larger established proportion, if not a majority. The only parallel I can think of would be the ‘conquest’ scenario, where an invading power exercises control over a defeated population, taking over the media and civic establishments and placing their agents and quisling collaborators in key positions to dominate, control and stamp their identity on their new subjects. This is exactly what would have happened in 1940 if the Nazis has invaded – in fact, the German invasion plans are available in print, translated into English – and it seems to be pretty well exactly what the muslims are up to in the UK now. That they never had any intention to be content to exist as a small unrepresentative minority was evidenced even in the very early days of the invasion when, as a 1-2% minority (or less?), they started voicing ‘demands’ to have their Islamic holidays included in the official national calendar. THAT should have been a warning that they had ideas above their station.
What is needed in the UK is a properly democratic leadership that respects its established indigenous majority by affirming the cultural standards and identity that made the UK what it is – or has been, should I say? That means banning all practices (in public or with public consequences, at least) that contradict/undermine/offend against established UK principles of law, morality and social acceptability, and punishing those who try to impose these practices. So:-
(a) Sharia law and practices become illegal and their practitioners punished as being in contempt of the will of the people in Parliament;
(b) all face-coverings become illegal except for medical or safety reasons (e.g., motor cycle helmets when actually riding);
(c) any form of polygamy or polyandry, no matter how and when contracted, to be prosecuted under existing anti-polygamy legislation;
(d) any form of abuse of the established principles of democratic and responsible universal suffrage to be prosecuted under law, whether this be in the form of unacceptable coercion within families or religious communities, or outright electoral fraud;
(e) any form of abuse of the individual’s right to religious or political freedom of choice to be prosecuted (which would, of course, entail outlawing Islamic teachings on apostasy);
(f) any form of coercion or threat of criminal action against a person, or conspiracy to the same, where this infringes the liberty and civic rights of the person as defined in UK law, to be prosecuted with the full
force of the law; (this would effectively tackle the scourges of ‘honour killings’, forced marriages and FGM);
(g) likewise, any form of attempted unlawful coercion or interference with the rights of individuals in public places to be prosecuted under law with the threat of imprisonment; (this would deal with ‘sharia patrols’);
(h) in order to show some fundamental level of respect to animals, strict standards of animal welfare according to established UK standards of acceptability to be enforced in relation to slaughter houses, and all practices that do not meet these standards to be banned and their practitioners prosecuted; (this should make pre-stunning mandatory, which would render halal practices illegal);
And I could go on. No doubt some scurrilous (‘human righjs’?) lawyer could shoot a few holes in that lot, but it all basically summarises what Mr/Mrs/ Ms Average in the UK regard as what they generally stand for, and they are the ones who, in the spirit of Magna Carta, are supposed to be calling the shots in the UK. So if anyone in the UK wishes to disagree, what the hell are THEY doing in the UK?
Robeaver says
Or civil war. Coming soon to a country near you, or around you, or beside you. Like a forest needs a fire.
billybob says
How hard can it be to control the borders? England is an island for god’s sake.We probably do a better job in Canada and the USA in spite of having thousands of miles of border to protect.
IanB says
In order to understand what is happening in the UK you need to know of the influence of an organisation named Common Purpose (CP).
Google “Common Purpose exposed” to learn disturbing truths.
rabrooks says
OK, so until you get proper information don’t let them in! Why is that so hard to comprehend?