Yes, they wrote “your,” not “you’re.” They’re too busy cracking down on the freedom of speech to bother with basic grammar. They’re too busy policing what people say (no doubt with stamping out “Islamophobia” as their first and highest priority) to devote any significant energy and resources to tracking down those who commit female genital mutilation. They’re too busy making sure that the British people observe politically correct speech restrictions to stop Muslim rape gangs. They’re too busy making sure “right-wing extremists” aren’t typing something naughty to conduct proper surveillance of the numerous known jihad terrorists who are walking around free in Britain.
They’ve never tweeted any warnings about that their “boys & gals in blue” would ever find any of those people. Only this.
Britain is finished.
Lawrence says
Come and find me you bastards. In my country we fight and die for the freedom of expression. Thank God we revolted against the British.
BC says
Robert should check his own knowledge of English grammar. ‘Your emergency’ is quite correct in fact. The error is in the missed apostrophe in ‘Whats’, which should read ‘What’s’ for a contraction of What is?.
They also missed the question mark> The English are very careless with apostrophes, even officials!
Barguest says
BC Robert was referring to “your spewing”, which really should read *you’re* spewing – the contracted form of “you are”. So Robert’s entirely correct to highlight this. It raises the question: what, if any, are the literacy standards required to be a plod in the UK these days? Perhaps adherence to The Narrative is preferred over a good command of the Queen’s English.
patriotliz says
Thank you…Barguest…I too was puzzled w/ —what is wrong w/ “your” emergency?
In any event the twitter page of the Wiltshire Police has lots of “spewing” of criticism of their police and their Gestapo-like “hate crime” crack down. Join in the fun @wiltshirepolice.
Anne Smith says
Thanks for the info Patriotliz. The Twitter page makes wonderful reading – I was laughing out loud.
It seems the British have not lost their sense of humour but are well aware of the real danger facing our once great country. It is amazing how people are waking up to reality. It is also amazing that the Police Forces are so consumed with :PC as to be incapable of preventing crime and enforcing the law, or indeed even understanding what actually constitutes a crime rather than an emotion.
Phil Copson says
“Robert should check his own knowledge of English grammar. ‘Your emergency’ is quite correct in fact. The error is in the missed apostrophe in ‘Whats’, which should read ‘What’s’ for a contraction of What is?.
They also missed the question mark> The English are very careless with apostrophes, even officials!”
————————————————————————————————————————————-The twitter message from Wiltshire Police reads “You can’t hide from us if your spewing abuse from behind a computer screen. Our boys& gals in blue will find you.”
The first sentence even appears in bold print as part of the heading of this article, so it has been made obvious that it is the message that Robert is referring to – (“your spewing”) – and not the Hashtag “WhatsYourEmergency”.
I also object to “boys & gals” since (1) there is no such expression, and (2) it contains an ampersand substituted for the word “and”; two errors in only 9 characters is going some….
Ampersands are all well and good in company names such as “Matthew & Son” but lazy and ridiculous in a sentence – who is so pressed for time that they need to save two letters ?
All in all, that message was offensive both in it’s threatening tone and in revealing that our taxes are being used to employ dim-wits.
Misuse of apostrophes – right with you – most people seem unable to see an “s” without putting an apostrophe in front of it.
Rickytee says
BC it is you who is incorrect – because in fact you didn’t (did not) read the heading or the tweet, as printed, correctly. “If you’re spewing abuse” It was meaning “if you ARE spewing abuse.” So what Bequest has written is entirely correct, as is Robert.
Actually, this contracted form of “you are” which is frequently incorrectly used as *your* is far too prevalent – and not only in Britain, but in posts around many of the English speaking countries.
As is the incorrect use of apostrophes. I believe the blame for this incorrect grammar (and also with incorrect spelling) must lie with faulty and poor education of English in our schools. One thing that really annoys me is the very poor use of tenses…few people these days seem to know the correct past tense of many verbs….spit and fit come to mind…to spit, have spat, to fit have fitted etc., I don’t go along with the argument that “it’s the modern trend.” or some other idiotic excuse which, apart from being nonsensical is simply against correct usage of our language. Period.
Phil Copson says
“One thing that really annoys me is the very poor use of tenses…few people these days seem to know the correct past tense of many verbs….”
The inability to speak and pronounce basic English appears to be a essential requirement of employment at the BBC, together with an eager willingness to adopt the latest fashion in sentence construction or mispronunciation.
Currently, in any sentence requiring the word “has”, the modish BBC presenter will immediately substitute the words “is” or “are”, so that we are constantly advised that “It is been decided….” / “The Government are announced….” etc. The word “currently” will be mispronounced as “carrantly”, and “Government” will pronounced “guvvermunt”. “Secretary of State” gives them the chance to try out various options, such as “secker-tree” and “secker-terry”, but never, of course, the right one – after all, it might be “elitist”…..
The word “the” is normally pronounced as either “thuh” or “thee” depending on the first syllable of the next word – you wouldn’t say “thee ship” and you wouldn’t say “thuh exit”, but such conventions don’t weigh with the BBC; absolutely everything has to have a “thuh” sound plonked where it doesn’t belong, so that news reports are an ugly succession of “thuh interest rate” / “thuh ISIS-held town” / “thuh economy” etc.
The idea that words are pronounced slighty differently depending on whether they are employed as a noun or an adjective, has passed the BBC by completely. If you say that “There has been an increase in public spending.” then most people would get it right, with the stress on “in”. But asked to read out the words “Public spending has increased.” they have no idea that the stress should now be on the second syllable “creased”. (Similarly with “a protest”/ “a proTESTer”, “a survey” / “to surVEY” etc – after all nobody in their right mind would refer to someone as a “SURveyor”, rather than as a “surVEYor”.)
The letter “T” has been practically banned altogether – presumably as a cost-saving measure – so that BBC Radio 4 news is studded with “wha'” “tha'” and “bu’ in place of “what”, “that” and “but”. The habit even spread to coverage of Wimbledon, where we assured that such-and-such a match was taking place on “Centre Cour'”. There really is almost no limit to the spread of demotic yob-speak – when Government ministers can utter such a ghastly mangled mess as “Wha’-weer-gunner-raff-tuh-doo” (ie – “What we are going to have to do”) and babble that “Government spending must be bargainful” then what hope is there for literacy in this strange new country they call “Grey Bri’unn” ?
Does it matter ? Yes – because people with so little character that they instantly adopt whatever speech-patterns they hear about them, obviously have no independence of thought either, and are as ready to throw away core principles such as the freedom of speech and national sovereignty as they are to discard correct pronunciation.
Bindon Blood says
Have you noticed how many people on T.V and radio and on the street are saying “Haitch” instead of the correct pronunciation,”Aitch” This is getting to be too common to be coincidence; it is being taught.Also the expression “try AND do it” instead of “try To do it” “educated” people say this. Perhaps it is me.
Bindon Blood says
The Colonists WERE British!!. Britain did not have this nonsense then. it’s not so different in the US,don’t pretend it is.You don’t think the English people support this sort of speech control,surely?
Kepha says
Point well taken, Bindon. I gather you’re British?
A historian named John Pocock once wrote a book entitled _Three British Revoliutions_, in which he discusses the revolutions of 1638, 1689, and ours in 1776. An earlier generation of Americans were also very much aware of how “British” or “English” they were in their political and legal thinking. I admit so myself, even though my own heritage is “British” chiefly through cultural osmosis.
gravenimage says
True, Bindon and Kepha. The American colonists were not anti-British–they were angry because they were not being afforded full rights as Britons.
Tom says
So what about the hate being spewed from behind the mask of religion by those called imams? Are they not going to be sought with every fibre of resource that is at the disposal of the British police?
Of course we only expect the jackboot tactics from the official blueshirts of the British government to be directed at those standing up for freedom and free speech who may hurt the feelings of muslims.
john spielman says
according the this police communique ALL THE MOSQUES SHOULD E SHUT DOWN !
gravenimage says
Spot on, Tom.
AzB says
Very true. And its only thanks to the conservatives that “hate within religion” didn’t become completely protected, while “hate outside religion” was possible to prosecute.
labour actually wanted to give religion absolute protection. they nearly passed that but were outvoted and forced to amend wording.
David says
Wiltshire Police: “You can’t hide from us if your spewing abuse from behind a computer screen. Unless if you’re [your] a radical, anti-Western, terrorist-supporting Muslim, then you will be given carte blanche as well as our full support.”
Stonewall says
Dave you nailed it…
Wiltshire Police: “You can’t hide from us if your spewing abuse from behind a computer screen. Unless if you’re [your] a radical, anti-Western, terrorist-supporting Muslim, then you will be given carte blanche as well as our full support.”
That is what they meant to write.
They can’t write that just yet. Not for a few more years. not until the full Jihad begins in the U.K..
When that day comes, Britons will be attacked by Muslims and their own government,. openly…
marblenecltr says
From the land of Malthus, Darwin, the Huxleys, Cecil Rhodes and his Scholarship, London School of Economics, H. G. Wells, G. B. Shaw and Fabians, Orwell, … World, you have been warned, the loonies have taken over the asylum and taken more residents. National Health Hospital poorly staffed in the Philosophical Sanity wing.
This head-in-the-san says
The UK is in its death throes. At this time, the UK is on life-support, death will be its eventuality because the priority is to expunge freedom of speech and thought from law-abiding citizens. More consideration and justice is handed to the Islamist Jihadists bent on the UK’s annihilation than the aforesaid citizenry. Weak-kneed, gutless politicos, and midget minded bureaucrats are treasonous to the Union and the law-abiding citizens.
One imagines that Sir Winston S. Churchill is now turning over in his grave. “Now, this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning.”
Unfortunately, this great leader’s voice is history. History holds no weight or importance to the self-anointed Overlords and their tag-along minions. If it weren’t for the likes of Churchill and the sacrifice of others during WWII, Great Britain would have expired long ago.
Several generations onward the UK is in freefall, because of the appeasers mirroring Neville Chamberlain, not the great leaders of the past.
Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning.
Read more at: https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/w/winstonchu163144.html
Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning.
Read more at: https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/w/winstonchu163144.html
gravenimage says
There are still patriots in Britain. Don’t give up yet.
Fatts says
The Wiltshire Police, the Metropolitan Police and other police departments in once great Britain are now in the business of enforcing sharia, specifically blasphemy laws.
Any person in British territory who dares malign muslims, islam or the so-called prophet, Muhammad, will be hunted down and cast into prison. Hell, anything less than complimentary or praise-filled comments on Muhammad will probably be quickly erased from the internet if the website’s hosts are located in Britain.
Of course these fools will be caught flatfooted the next time some raghead decides to commit mass murder in the name of islam. Who can blame them though? They have other priorities.
Santa Voorhees says
“You can’t hide from us if your spewing abuse from behind a computer screen”
Guess who will spew abuse towards you when the UK goes full Sharia you retards!
RonaldB says
The sort of focus described here is pretty typical of police in third-world countries.
Every country, almost without exception, has strong laws on its books. The problem is to enforce them.
Generally, the police are afraid to mess with real violent criminals. So, they focus all their attention on basically law-abiding citizens, who present very little physical danger when being harassed.
And example comes from Jamaica a few decades ago. They had a big problem with violent street gangs, they they passed an ordinance requiring prison for anyone caught with any ammunition, no appeal.
The police weren’t about to go harass violent street gangs who would shoot at them, so they ended up sending to prison an American businessman who came to Jamaica on business and had a .22 bullet wedged in his luggage. So, it was a plus-plus for everyone except the businessman and the non-criminal Jamaicans. The cops got their stats, the gangs were unmolested, but of course, the crime rate was pretty much unaffected.
Westman says
Britain isn’t really finished, though it may appear that way. The government is simply making a mistake, under control of a Western Oligarchy, similar to the French aristocracy before the French revolution.
When the citizens have had enough they will throw government aside. Government currently has neither the will or capacity to even stop Muslims from rioting. Exactly how will government be relevant when the citizens, including its own armed forces, react with their own violence on a national scale? Send in the Wiltshire Police?
The longer the constituents of Western Oligarchy push Islamic migration and globalism the greater will be a reaction that might go so far as to strip them of their wealth and position. They are experimenting with citizens lives to fuel their industries and investments. However, unlike inanimate capital equipment, the human beehive can erupt.
These citizens are of a stock that survived Hitler. They will also survive Islam, with or without, the self-supposed masters.
AzB says
Exactly. A very significant percentage of the international speaking circuit on Islamic and multiculti related issues are British speakers. Dawkins Hitchins Murray Yanoupoulis and youtube activists like PJ Watson Sargon of Assad Thunderf00t. Plus the very strident tone of the press on all this. We have a mix of papers and outlets which run 90% negative stories on Islam, Mail Sun etc, compared to left wing ones, which are torn between positive stories about progressive values, and negative stories about abuse by muslim leaders , regimes, or individuals. And they tend to run a mixture of both (they do actually care about hte “human rights within the minority”. And you see even most of the left wing comments in articles in places such as teh guardian are at the very least WARY of the islamic issues at this point. Wary and sceptical. Probably critical of UK government ties to Saudi Arabia. that’s rising up the political agenda now for sure.
Also i think in terms of even BBC debates, there’s too many cases now where an audience boo’ed a speaker maybe in 2008 for saying something that sounded racist – about rape gangs or whatever, or honour killings, or shame culture, or something of this nature – and then there were more and more stories, and reports on failings by authorities, and then perhaps a few muslim women would “courageously speak out about it”. And suddenly the tone is changing because people remember they previously boo’ed someone for saying it.
Like Saira Khan who flatly denied any misogyny issues in community and orchestrate a studio boo’ing for Tommy Robinson some years back. But then herself appear on Loose Women and admit it is a massive problem, that she had been abused by a family member, that it was incredibly painful and hard to talk about it, and the act of talking about it had set off a chain reaction not just for her family in britain but for her family in pakistan aswell. Explaining exactly as to why people do not talk about these things!
So it’s gradually coming out. There’s a growing sense of the issues and dangers. And only a few weeks back, one of these aggressive “representatives of the muslim community” went on BBC calling Douglas Murrah an islamophobe far right extremist. And Nawzi Maajid aswell
Well the BBC had to apologise for the language “far right” and “extremist”. They put out a statement doing so. So that balance is shifting most certainly. The label was attempted to stick on. But was resisted and rejected.
As for hate speech laws: The police are kind of making a fool of themselves often with this law. Becoming a bit of a laughing stock. they arrest a bloke for a youtube video of his dog doing a nazi salute. They arrest a 15 year old kid for holding up a placard “scientology is a cult”. They arrested a boy from a school referred by his teachers to the radicalisation “prevent” program because he said he might vote for UKIP when he was older and made a joke about Caitlin Jenner. But in the meantime they ignore 100,000s of tweets daily abusing everyone on every side. What they gonna do. Turn off the internet??
Such actions by the coppers lose the support of working middle AND upper class. There’s that hard progressive left but they are much noisier due to constantly mobilising into a mob – they seem stronger than they are. Because of their dynamics as a group. ON street and online.
the reality is the vast majority of hate abuse – over 70% – before elections, was targeted at right wing MPs. And Owen Jones writes his irate piece about the abuse to the right wing. And defends Diane Abbott from the “vicious torrents of abuse to a woman of colour” etc.etc. But then the statistics reveal she got less than 15% as much abuse as Tim Farron.
These “progressives” are the new “extremists”. they used to be talking genuine civil rights and that’s good, but the balance has shifted now; blacks actually do equally well to whites in terms of salaries aross most city professions in UK now. By contrast, working class white background offer the least opportunities of all. Something the labour leader Corbyn now fully accepts and his langauge on migration has changed. He almost sounds…shock horror…”far right”!
lol
Pumbar says
Good post mate!
AzB says
Also if you get charged in a hate speech law case and its obviously ridiculous, just go public with it, will get huge support and legal fund assistance from wider public. Probably become a bit of a folk hero. You can have a good laugh about it down the pub .
No one minds if someone gets arrested for sending genuinely vicious death threats to people. It seems sensible to arrest them.
it’s this other stuff which becomes a pure satire, and because of that, it undermines the very framework of manners they are seeking to enforce.
AzB says
I checked up btw and those same laws DO include nationality. I though nation was left out.
So technically it would be hateful to abuse a “patriotic englishman” for waving an England flag around.
If you call them a racist idiot etc – that’s kind of hate speech under the very same law.
Pretty sure the left isn’t aware of that one. But yep. Nation is in there … it’s in the list. 😉
Pumbar says
+1
Benedict says
At some point a police force in a democracy turns from being legitimate upholders of law and order into being subversive quislings. When that happens Civil War is waiting in the wings, and then some boys & gals in blue, who put their money on the wrong horse, might regret their decision.
DRHazard says
All you have to do is make a YouTube video containing nothing but quotes from the Quran and Hadith.
They are filled with hate speech. Here are a few examples of Muhammad speaking about women:
Sahih Bukhari (6:301) – “[Muhammad] said, ‘Is not the evidence of two women equal to the witness of one man?’ They replied in the affirmative. He said, ‘This is the deficiency in her intelligence.'”
Al-Tirmidhi 3272 – “When Allah’s Messenger was asked which woman was best he replied, ‘The one who pleases (her husband) when he looks at her, obeys him when he gives a command, and does not go against his wishes regarding her person or property by doing anything of which he disapproves’.” (See also Abu Dawud 1664)
Ishaq 969 – “Lay injunctions on women kindly, for they are prisoners with you having no control of their persons.” – This same text also says that wives may be beaten for “unseemliness”.
Tabari Vol 9, Number 1754 – “Treat women well, for they are [like] domestic animals with you and do not possess anything for themselves.” From Muhammad’s ‘Farewell Sermon’.
To get the attention of the police the video should have a title like:
“Muslims lie about Islam being good for women”
“Muhammad’s seventh century views on women”
“Muhammad claims women are dumber than men”
The rest of the video should be just quotes from Islamic scriptures and the biographies of Muhammad.
Then make another video addressing all the quotes on Jews, homosexuals and non-Muslims in general.
If Islam wasn’t a recognized religion practiced mostly by non-white people, the Quran and Hadith would be banned in the UK for hate speech. If Muhammad were alive today he would be arrested in the UK for hate speech unless he decided to lie and hide his hateful thoughts and pretend to be “moderate”, which would be OK under Islam.
Irene Brekelmans says
The UK police start to sound like threatening us with coming Christal night, first the Jews, than rthe Christians and then the Infidels. and Ronald B is right, you can’t catch the big ones, the real criminals, who murder, rape, stone, mutilate, etc, too much to call them by name, so you are looking for an easy catch like us. You killed our freedom of speech. And then you catch us and go to the Media: Look at us, we caught them all. And all the leftists/globalists/feminists will yell, hoera! what a fantastic policeforce we have. And we don’t have guns or anything.
But I have something to tell you. Did you ever hear when people are dying, that they are seeing their whole life passing by? You must have and it is true. Every word you ever talked, every thought you ever had, every action and move you ever made is registered in what they call, the Holy Grit. As everybody has a part of God within him/herself, all is recorded and when you die, you will pass by the Grit and will see your whole life. Lying is not possible as everything is recorded, you will see the wrong and the pain you did to others and what they did to you and you will feel that painand that is how the end of your life here on earth goes, until your next reincarnation and then, who knows you might be on the other side to get to know what it feels like, to have your throat slid, to be stoned to death, to be raped by so many men, that you are not able to walk any more. To be threatened and tried to put terror in people who want to have it east to conquer you and take over your countries with Sharia law that has nothing to do with religion. You will see what is treason and not be protected by your own governments.
We will see, because you will end up in fighting each other, but then it is too late. You made your bed and have to lay in it. It is a very good thing that everything is recorded, so you can never ly to God, neither can Muslims, like any other religion. So before you do your next killing, think about it twice, may be you come to the conclusion, that it is not such a good idea. What you do, comes back to you and I am sorry, with the killing, there are no 72 virgins. That was and is a fable from somebody to lure you.
And “? says”you are talking about cowardness, why don’t you put your name down and only a? ?
You don’t have to be afraid of us, we want free speech, that is all, and I think that we spoke a lot with respect, but you went a bit far now with the word “spewing”, that is not a word from an English policeman, I bet, but you lost your country already and so many other countries will be lost, but then you will never know what happens in the end.
All countries make mistakes, but to sell out your own children and grand children goes too far. Have a good sleep tonight in Europe and a good day in the USA/Canada/Australia. All is “WELL”
gravenimage says
I *do not* believe that all the victims of Jihad were once violent Jihadists. For one thing, there have been many more victims than perpetrators. More to the point, the idea that victims of Jihad were probably once perpetrators encourages blaming the poor victims–including many entirely decent people.
mortimer says
1984 is now here. Who would have thought such a message would come from the UK police?
Thought crimes will now be punished.
Pumbar says
I thought you, of all people, would have refrained from the over-exuberance Mortimer.
gravenimage says
This story actually *is* pretty appalling, Pumbar. I feel badly for all patriotic Britons.
Halal Bacon says
another muslim make work project?
Georg says
“your”. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. The whole tone of this sounds Sarsour-esque. Makes one wonder. This, folks, is entryism.
Cthulhu says
Hey, Wiltshire Police!
“Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.” – Article 19., The Universal Declaration of Human Rights of United Nations.
Michael Poulin says
GK Chesterton predicted an England under Islam –
from Wikipedia:
“The Flying Inn is the final novel by G. K. Chesterton, first published in 1914. It is set in a future England where the Temperance movement has allowed a bizarre form of “Progressive” Islam to dominate the political and social life of the country. Because of this, alcohol sales to the poor are effectively prohibited, while the rich can get alcoholic drinks “under a medical certificate”. The plot centres on the adventures of Humphrey Pumph (see also Humphrey Pump) and Captain Patrick Dalroy, who roam the country in their cart with a barrel of rum in an attempt to evade Prohibition, exploiting loopholes in the law to temporarily prevent the police taking action against them. Eventually the heroes and their followers foil an attempted coup by an Islamic military force. “
gravenimage says
Thanks for citing GK Chesterton, Michael.
gravenimage says
UK: Police vow “You can’t hide from us if your (sic) spewing abuse from behind a computer screen”
…………………….
Well, this is just insane. Are they going after violent Jihad terrorists with anything like this degree of zeal? Not that I have heard.
Meanwhile, I suppose abuse is just fine so long as it is about slaughtering the “filthy Infidels”…
Pumbar says
Have you seen how much hilarity that tweet has caused online here?
The tweet is even under investigation by the online grammar police
https://mobile.twitter.com/search?q=wiltshire+police&src=typeahead_click
Finished? In this case, literally, a joke.
gravenimage says
Great to see that so many Britons are slamming this insanity, Pumbar!
I just hope this means that the Wiltshire Police will back down.
Pumbar says
I think the tweet will disappear soon. I just hope Sargon of Akkad gets a hold of one of the clown coppers involved for a fun Youtube video!
Carolyne says
Actually I emailed the Wiltshire police asking them if this kind of loss of freedom is not shameful in the land of Magna Carts. I also told them that Winston Churchill would be ashamed of them. I did receive a reply telling me that they will reply later. I also corrected their use of “Your.”
gravenimage says
Good for you, Carolyne!
Flavius Claudius Iulianus says
What if the hate (and indignation) is directed at the Wiltshire Police themselves? What are you going to do then?
Shameful that in the land of Eric Blair and his “1984” these semi-literate “boys and gals in blue” ignoramuses are inadvertently and ironically making Big Brother come to life.
Lydia says
I have some more real news for them:
I’M NOT HIDING!!!
I would be there with a sign on the rooftop if I were over there,
when that day comes here, you will see it for yourself!
I can’t wait!
David M says
It’s the UK Police who should be worried, & won’t be able to hide when the jihadis in Britain really kick off, It’s not like they can pull their gun out & shoot the jihadis as they don’t have guns.
We’ve already seen the average cop get stabbed to death by jihadis, & the jihadis only killed when the armed units turn up.
gravenimage says
Grimly true.
shosh7154 says
Is there any way to communicate with these “language” police ? Perhaps their jurisdiction covers people contacting them from outside Britain ?
shosh7154 says
Everyone go to their twitter site and read the tweets…they are hilarious. It looks like the British still have the best laughs
shosh7154 says
Ooops ! I see the website now…making comments now
Phil Copson says
No surprises here – it was also Mike Veale, the Chief Constable of Wiltshire, who decided to jump on the band-wagon of claiming that various public figures are/were members of paedophile gangs by claiming that the former Prime Minister Edward Heath was a paedophile.
The fact that both as a serving and as an ex-Prime Minister, Heath was accompanied everywhere by protection squad officers and his movements logged, seemed not to register on Veale’s radar.
He staged a press conference in front of the gates of Ted Heath’s old house in Salisbury, and dragged the man’s name and reputation through the gutter in front of the world. This wasn’t because he had incontrovertible evidence, but because he hoped that the publicity would provide some. Millions of pounds and months of police time were then duly wasted on trying to build up a case to support his accusations. When an independent expert on child abuse cases was called in to review what they had assembled, he found a collection of ludicrous sub-“Hammer Horror” stories claiming that children had been sacrificed on altars, murdered in churchyards (this in broad daylight in full view of passing traffic!) etc, and told them that they had nothing. The Chief Constable probably doesn’t care – he’s had his moment in the spotlight and done his bit to trash the Conservatives.
“Critically, it is not the role of the police to judge the guilt or innocence of people……” he pontificated, before going on to claim moronically that he was “120 per cent” convinced of Sir Edward’s guilt….
This wasn’t policing, it was a horrible bit of dim-witted Left-wing Agitprop street-theatre, much like the threatening tweet re “Hatecrime”.
If “your” reading this Mike – what’s the penalty for holding the “wrong” opinions about the Chief Constable of Wiltshire ?
FYI says
Of course this is the same British constabulary that cannot figure out the Motive part of the standard Method-Opportunity-Motive paradigm used for solving crime,especially when devout muslims choose to go on their murderous rampages…
It is easy to figure out the Methods(running over civilians by car,stabbing police officers to death)and as for Opportunity..well infidels are everywhere and ..so are British police officers as potential targets.
But the Motivation for such attacks?What could possibly lie behind that islamic tendency to slay innocent unbelievers(and British police officers) wherever they happen to be found?
Is there some bright spark in the British Police,some budding Sherlock Holmes, that can figure it out?
Well now…. the Motivation for such islamic atrocities comes straight from their god allah in his perfect book..
“Slay the unbelievers wherever you find them”k2:191.
See?Was that so hard for a British detective to understand?Apparently so.
The British police constabulary cannot figure this one out:that the motivation for islamic atrocities is inspired by the koranic teachings of allah and by the example of his “prophet”,the most incredibly perfect man that ever lived,muhammed.
It is part and parcel of the Islamic belief system.It always has been and always will be.
There is a clear and obvious cause and effect connection.Alas,the pc PCs cannot reach such advanced level of reasoning.
If only it were the 1970s when completely innocent Irish people could be locked up on trumped up charges using intentionally falsified forensic “evidence” like the notoriously criminally corrupt West Midlands Serious Crime Squad.Ah!what great days they were for the British Police!The police themselves could commit any crime and get away with it.Not like today surely..unless of course their bosses in the Freemasons have their say(they always do).
This is the same dishonorable British police force that KNOWINGLY sent completely innocent people to jail for IRA bomb atrocities whilst the actual terrorist perpetrators got away with murder…the Guildford 4,the Birmingham 6…the blatant criminality of the once-decent UK police force!
By all means put terrorist perpetrators in jail but rounding up innocent folk and sending them up for life on falsified forensic evidence is as criminally vile as planting a bomb.
This is the same discredited Politically correct British police force (the pc PCs)with its freemasonic bosses.
These are the boys and gals in blue in the British Police that have quite a long,long history of being somewhat economical with the truth.
If you every hear a British Police officer boasting…just say “West Midlands Serious Crime squad” or “Freemasons;by the way how’s your boss”………..
The British Police.
a force you can trust?
Let’s ask the freemasons in charge…
YorkshireKufir says
Uphold the existing law you parasites.,erm polcemen, that is your job, not protect the feelings of child rapists, acid attackers and knife wielding followers of the religion of permanent offence.
Sarah says
There is a new article tonight published by Gatestone Institute, written by the wonderful Douglas Murray, which discusses the uselessness of the British authorities and their ‘enough is enough’ waffle after the London Bridge terror attack – and how nothing has actually been done.
Well except for chasing the people who are standing up and flat out refusing to capitulate to the sickening insanity displayed by the British authorities and the cowards on the Left – along with their seething, sadistic-agenda filled buddies of Islam.
Pathetic. Beyond pathetic. You know what scares the helll out of me? These idiots in charge who salivate over the idea of Islam – who have the nuclear codes to the UK’s nuclear arsenal. To the military and economic might that the UK owns and holds.
If the Brits swallow this and do not fight back – then they are no better than the Swede’s, the Germans, the French, the Italians, the Canadians and the Spanish etc. Look at HOW MANY nation’s are starting to crumble – ALL thanks to Islam. The list is getting enormous now.
The Brits can go down with their own sinking ship for all I care at this point. You people are being slaughtered in your own street’s by Muslims who want nothing more than to take over your entire nation and turn it into an Islamic cesspit – and you say NOTHING and do NOTHING. Now your own Police are hunting you, watching closely for any Brit who dares to say something against this. Time to remember your forebears. Remember Winston Churchill. Remember Enoch Powell. GROW A PAIR and fight back.
I fear that all of us, whichever Western nation we all individually hail from, will eventually be forced to face this same outcome. Be obedient and submissive to our ‘leaders’ and accept the festering creep of Islam into our lives – or fight back aggressively and violently to prevent it.
John A. Marre says
They will arrest you for saying that Islam is a violent religion, and that its members regularly practice rape and murder on non-Members.
They will not arrest you if you are obviously Muslim and threaten rape and murder on non-Muslims.
Pumbar says
Oh dear, the tweet is now ‘unavailable’. Odd that…
gravenimage says
Great to hear, Pumbar!
Pumbar says
One day PC will mean ‘Police Constable’ again GI!
gravenimage says
I hope so, Pumbar!
gravenimage says
And what a nasty substance it is, Mark.
gravenimage says
“?” wrote:
“Had to be fought for”
Intrinsic: belonging to the essential nature or constitution of a thing. If your so called “rights were “intrinsically” self evident to man then you wouldn’t have to fight for them nor would it be possible for other men to take them away! Think!
……………………..
It is “?” who is incapable of reasoned thought.
“Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains.”
–Jean-Jacques Rousseau
Brave people fought hard to assert their rights–and the fight goes on today. That is a large part of what Anti-Jihadists are doing when they oppose Islam–*of course* “?” is snickering at this.
More:
Notice how Gravy (sic) the Trampled Freedoms of Internet cowards SJW here supports tyranny and hates the principle of true freedom. He (sic) is completely missing the underlying point, avoids (understandably as he (sic) is a complete cuck) the bearing arms issue, and is instead more concerned about making excuses for tyranny! Not surprised at all.
……………………..
How is supporting the rights of man and freedom of speech ‘supporting tyranny’? This–of course–makes no sense.
And no one here has mentioned the right to bear arms–which I very much support, along with the other rights guaranteed in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
More:
“Natural rights of man”
LeL Indeed I don’t as I don’t deal with works of fiction!
……………………..
More sneering at the achievements of the free West. Just appalling.
More:
Fine… Here’s a challenge for you, how about you go to the victims of the Arab Slave trade and tell them all about their “intrinsic human rights” go ahead! Go lecture some African “comfort women” on this simple subject of self evidence. Go ahead, I’ll wait.
……………………..
The idea that those who support human rights lecture the victims is, of course, grotesque.
Do African Infidels–and Yezidis and Christians in the Islamic State–have the right to freedom? Yes, they do. Civilized people do not believe that enslaving people represents “strength”, as “?” appears to.
Pretending that it is the free West that is preventing these people from being free–rather than the followers of the vicious creed of Islam–is obviously sickeningly false.
The idea that freedom is meaningless unless we are able to free everyone on the face of the earth is nothing but nihilistic.
Robert Spencer works with former slaves, the Barnabas Fund aids Christians who have been enslaved, and several Catholic orders buy and free slaves.
What is “?” doing besides sneering at these victims?
gravenimage says
I’m not sure what happened to the post by “?” that I was replying to here.
Mark Swan says
It looks Like ? was caught, and now is not.
He certainly tried to provoke violent comments that he could link to this site—He failed.
Thank you gravenimage for your consistent effort to unveil this malicious posting.
gravenimage says
Thank you, Mark–you and other posters here ably opposed “?’s” ugliness, as well. Good work.
gravenimage says
And yes–I think you are right about his aim here. *Ugh*.
Terry says
? also posted- seems to have disappeared- that people hide behind their computers, using pseudonyms .
But he was doing the same.
He (in a later post) said that if he used his real name he could go to the brig (military jail in the US) and somethign about his job. However, he does not/did not, allow the same consideration for others.
gravenimage says
Spot on, Terry.
Phil Copson says
“……Jet fuel can apparently melt steel beams……”
It doesn’t require the addition of “jet fuel” – (which is nothing special anyway, compared to petrol) – to cause a steel-framed building to collapse in a fire.
You’re very free with accusations of stupidity, but a moments’ thought would tell you that the steel doesn’t have to become molten in order for a building to collapse. The steel only needs to be subjected to sufficient heat to cause it to lose enough strength that it can no longer support the vast weight of the building. The steel then bends and the building collapses; it’s that simple – no conspiracy required.
This can happen in an ordinary fire, let alone one where a large quantity of fuel has been added. This is why there is a world-wide industry in manufacturing fire-resistant coatings to protect structural steel – it’s an everyday hazard. The steel frame of residential buildings is protected against fire by coatings such as intumescent paint, mineral board etc. The larger the building, the larger the possible fire and the more time it will take to evacuate, therefore fire-protection will be specified to give the required number of hours protection to evacuate the building and extinguish any fire before the frame is damaged. (A factory or warehouse on the other hand, with comparitively few people in it, little combustible material, and everybody on the ground-floor, can be evacuated in minutes, so there is generally no need.)
Again, it obviously does not require every column across the building to have been weakened for the frame to give way; if enough columns in one area fail, then the building will tilt and fall in exactly the same way that a tree falls if you chop away part of the trunk.
Nobody factors-in the addition of far more combustible material than the building itself is likely to contain, hence the inadequacy of the escape routes and structural failure before the Towers could be completely evacuated.
Molten steel dripping down the outside? Nobody but a fool could believe this. That would have been plastic or aluminium etc from window frames and external cladding.
Enough already with the conspiracy theories! – next thing somebody will be claiming that there are those in government so unworthy of our trust, that they’d willingly betray us in exchange for a fast buck and peer-group approval. No – hang about, that’s already hap……….