Remember: this kind of thinking is what enabled the Muslim rape gangs in the first place. One Muslim rape gang victim said that when she went to authorities, “I was made to feel as though I was racist.” And 1,400 British non-Muslim children were gang-raped and brutalized by Muslims in Rotherham, and “several staff described their nervousness about identifying the ethnic origins of perpetrators for fear of being thought as racist; others remembered clear direction from their managers not to do so.”
But the BBC stays the course, and is as determined as it ever was to demonize all opposition to jihad terror and Sharia criminality (which is what this rape gang activity is, as the Qur’an sanctions the seizure of Infidel women as sex slaves — see 4:3, 4:24, 23:1-6, 33:50, 70:30) as “racist.” The BBC apparently wants to see the destruction of Britain as a free state. And it will.

marina says
Whatever happened to good versus evil!! Have we lost our senses of distinguishing between right and wrong?
WorkingClassPost says
Is our response racist?
What response?
manxcat says
Dear WorkingClassPost,
Great post! Your two words could be used to describe the entire western response to the Muslim challenge.
dsinc says
+1 Spot on.. What response indeed.
WorkingClassPost says
Surely the question should be Are grooming gangs racist?
Or has BBC finally accepted that fact?
Infidel Lass says
Yes, it is racist.
When we close our eyes on the systematic abuse of little girls out of fear of being called names because they’re “only” White, and the culprits are tan, our response to the grooming gangs is racist. Had the perpetrators been John Smiths and White, the problem would’ve been dealt with years ago. But because they’re Pakistanis, we’ve sacrificed our youths to these rapists. So is our response racist, BBC? Yes it is. Privilege of one group over another due to skin colour is racist. No-one is racist for pointing out fact. They are for covering up anti-white crime, though.
JP says
So very, very correct. What ever happened to the TRUTH? The cold hard facts, i.e., the TRUTH. The gangs were comprised of: Pakistani-Islamic-Muslims, sure they are criminals, and they have destroyed weak-willed girls of minimum age. When did protected these brutal criminals start–it needs to stop !!!
Carole says
It is reverse racism. These white girls are being profiled, used and abused and the authorities are not protecting them.
Imagine if Neo-Nazi young males were grooming and terrorizing young Muslim women? And the authorities didn’t report it! It is inconceivable and the public outcry would be deafening…..
Kenny says
Can anyone help me please?
Try as I might, I just can’t seem to recall what race Islam is.
Please help, as I feel so inadequate for not knowing this.
Am I racist for saying this?
Kenny says
Oh, one more thing; is it racist for the perpetrators of these rapes to openly state that they targeted white girls as they are trash, etc?
No, probably not!
Please excuse my ignorance, but I’m not a politically correct seeker of a ‘right on of the week’, award!
Lydia says
Q: BBC: “Is our response to grooming gangs racist?”
A: YES. Because you hold the middle eastern migrants (usually muslims) up on a special pedestal, with special privileges, and special rights, and special protections and exemptions from accusation, and many other things like that. But you do all of this at the expense of the white Europeans in the host country, where the criminals are guests. By these very racist deeds in favor of one group at the expense of the other, you are ‘grooming’ rape gangs into existence.
It’s the race card all over again. Suppose a non white commits a crime, or is suspected of it. A white guy claims he may have committed the crime. Then the non white pulls the race card by saying ‘you’re just claiming I am guilty because I’m (black, etc.)’ and in other words it is like saying because he is (whatever non white race) he could not have committed the crime and thus must be innocent. So you can never accuse a non white of a crime because that would be ‘racist,’ which in itself is ‘racist’ to say that this would be racist.
It is similar to the ‘oh, you’re white, therefore you are racist.’ “Uh, no, I am not a racist, but because you just ‘pre’-judged me based on the color of my skin, YOU are the racist.” Assuming anyone must be a racist based on the color of their skin, IS racism by definition. But this appears to be a real mind blower to so many out there these days!!! God help them! And us! O :
SK says
It’s not racism to arrest rapists.
Not even if they’re part of an ethnic minority.
R Cole says
I think instead of looking at these cases from the vantage point of Leftwing opposition, we have to view it as a human rights or civil rights issue. Because these girls were non-Muslims they faced discrimination, and were not granted equal protection under the law. That if these were Muslim girls raped by non-Muslim or Christian men, their cases would have been dealt with differently.
Under international law children are guaranteed protection. If this continues, someone should end up in the Hague on charges of gross human rights violations. In this light BBC can continue to play their silly leftist semantic games.
But here’s some new definitions for the BBC…
At this moment, these girls and their families should file a class action lawsuit against the state. It should include discrimination, human rights abuse, hate speech – when a rape victim is called or it is implied that they are a racist, solely for being unlucky enough to have been raped by a Muslim male, this should be classed as racism or a hate crime, neglect and failure to protect a minor from harm.
::
This is the sort of stuff we read about from the Islamic world, where Muslim men in Pakistan and Egypt can rape, kidnap non-Muslim girls with impunity. Now we are reading about happening here in the west. In the Islamic world they get away with it because they were Muslim and in the west they get away with it because they are Muslim.
Ignore the Left. And log these cases of mass rape, in the UK, Sweden and now Germany as human rights violations. For example in Sweden, the government holds that because these men are Muslims they don’t know that raping non-Muslim women and girls is wrong. Where they seem to be admitting that they are not prepared to take action to prevent further sexual assaults on women and girls. Where they seem to show bias against the rape victims. If the rapist is a Muslim male, reports suggest more than 90% are, the perpetrator’s identity is not made public. Giving a false sense of security, which can only lead to more girls falling victim. In the past Muslims immigrants, have given interviews, speaking of fellow immigrants who rape girls in Sweden or Norway for port. In this light, the rape victim should not only speak to the police. But also to a human rights agency who will log the details of her case and act on her behalf. With the aim to stop the rapes. And get justice for the girls.
Instead of looking at these cases from the vantage point of Leftwing opposition, we have to view it as a human rights or civil rights issue. Because these girls were non-Muslims they faced discrimination, and were not granted equal protection under the law. If they were Muslim girls raped by non-Muslim or Christian men, their cases would have been dealt with differently.
Children are guaranteed protection under international law . If this continues, someone should end up in the Hague on charges of gross human rights violations. In this light BBC can continue to play their silly leftist semantic games.
But here are some new definitions for the BBC…
At this moment, these girls and their families should file a class action lawsuit against the state. It should include discrimination, human rights abuse, hate speech – when a rape victim is called or it is implied that they are a racist, solely for being unlucky enough to have been raped by a Muslim male, it should be classed as racism or a hate crime, neglect and failure to protect a minor from harm.
::
This is the sort of stuff we read about from the Islamic world, where Muslim men in Pakistan and Egypt can rape, kidnap non-Muslim girls with impunity. Now we are reading about happening here in the west. In the Islamic world they get away with it because they were Muslim and in the west they get away with it because they are Muslim.
Ignore the Left. And log these cases of mass rape, in the UK, Sweden and now Germany as human rights violations. For example in Sweden, the government holds that because these men are Muslims they don’t know that raping non-Muslim women and girls is wrong. Where they seem to admit that they are not prepared to take action to prevent further sexual assaults on women and girls. Where they seem to show bias against the rape victims. If the rapist is a Muslim male, reports suggest more than 90% are, the perpetrator’s identity is not made public. Giving a false sense of security, which can only lead to more girls falling victim. In the past Muslims immigrants, have given interviews, speaking of fellow immigrants who rape girls in Sweden or Norway for port. In this light, the rape victim should not only speak to the police. But also to a human rights agency who will log the details of her case and act on her behalf. With the aim to stop the rapes. And get justice for the girls.
I think instead of looking at these cases from the vantage point of Leftwing opposition, we have to view it as a human rights or civil rights issue. Because these girls were non-Muslims they faced discrimination, and were not granted equal protection under the law. That if these were Muslim girls raped by non-Muslim or Christian men, their cases would have been dealt with differently.
Under international law children are guaranteed protection. If this continues, someone should end up in the Hague on charges of gross human rights violations. In this light BBC can continue to play their silly leftist semantic games.
But here’s some new definitions for the BBC…
At this moment, these girls and their families should file a class action lawsuit against the state. It should include discrimination, human rights abuse, hate speech – when a rape victim is called or it is implied that they are a racist, solely for being unlucky enough to have been raped by a Muslim male, this should be classed as racism or a hate crime, neglect and failure to protect a minor from harm.
::
This is the sort of stuff we read about from the Islamic world, where Muslim men in Pakistan and Egypt can rape, kidnap non-Muslim girls with impunity. Now we are reading about happening here in the west. In the Islamic world they get away with it because they were Muslim and in the west they get away with it because they are Muslim.
Ignore the Left. And log these cases of mass rape, in the UK, Sweden and now Germany as human rights violations. For example in Sweden, the government holds that because these men are Muslims they don’t know that raping non-Muslim women and girls is wrong. Where they seem to be admitting that they are not prepared to take action to prevent further sexual assaults on women and girls. Where they seem to show bias against the rape victims. If the rapist is a Muslim male, reports suggest more than 90% are, the perpetrator’s identity is not made public. Giving a false sense of security, which can only lead to more girls falling victim. In the past Muslims immigrants, have given interviews, speaking of fellow immigrants who rape girls in Sweden or Norway for port. In this light, the rape victim should not only speak to the police. But also to a human rights agency who will log the details of her case and act on her behalf. With the aim to stop the rapes. And get justice for the girls.
Instead of looking at these cases from the vantage point of Leftwing opposition, we have to view it as a human rights or civil rights issue. Because these girls were non-Muslims they faced discrimination, and were not granted equal protection under the law. If they were Muslim girls raped by non-Muslim or Christian men, their cases would have been dealt with differently.
Children are guaranteed protection under international law . If this continues, someone should end up in the Hague on charges of gross human rights violations. In this light BBC can continue to play their silly leftist semantic games.
But here are some new definitions for the BBC…
At this moment, these girls and their families should file a class action lawsuit against the state. It should include discrimination, human rights abuse, hate speech – when a rape victim is called or it is implied that they are a racist, solely for being unlucky enough to have been raped by a Muslim male, it should be classed as racism or a hate crime, neglect and failure to protect a minor from harm.
::
This is the sort of stuff we read about from the Islamic world, where Muslim men in Pakistan and Egypt can rape, kidnap non-Muslim girls with impunity. Now we are reading about happening here in the west. In the Islamic world they get away with it because they were Muslim and in the west they get away with it because they are Muslim.
Ignore the Left. And log these cases of mass rape, in the UK, Sweden and now Germany as human rights violations. For example in Sweden, the government holds that because these men are Muslims they don’t know that raping non-Muslim women and girls is wrong. Where they seem to admit that they are not prepared to take action to prevent further sexual assaults on women and girls. Where they seem to show bias against the rape victims. If the rapist is a Muslim male, reports suggest more than 90% are, the perpetrator’s identity is not made public. Giving a false sense of security, which can only lead to more girls falling victim. In the past Muslims immigrants, have given interviews, speaking of fellow immigrants who rape girls in Sweden or Norway for port. In this light, the rape victim should not only speak to the police. But also to a human rights agency who will log the details of her case and act on her behalf. With the aim to stop the rapes. And get justice for the girls.
Karina says
The fact that they even have to ask this question is absurd.
Rape is rape. Regardless of nationality, religion, race, or gender, it is a horrific crime and abuse of human rights and human dignity.
While it is true that rape exists all around the globe, it is much more endemic in Islam.
The current crisis of Muslim rape gangs in the UK, as well as the numerous assaults and rapes by Muslims elsewhere is directly brought upon by mass immigration policies and the fact that Islam sees non-Islams as fit for slavery and abuse.
It’s not racist at all to condemn a rape gang. In fact, it would be a disgrace to the victims to refuse to condemn the crime.
Janakiraman Rajalakshmi says
bbc has alwways been anti Israel , anti Hindu & pro muslim.
It is one useless channel giving fake news. bbc is also virulently anti Donald trump.
bbc reporters do not quote Emerson. They quote the inane tweets of bollywood scum.
Anne Smith says
The BBC hates Trump more than any other person. Every night their pathetic “news” tries to ridicule or vilify him in some way – to the detriment of their viewers who are denied British news just so that the leftie BBC can waste airtime on trying to bring Trump down.
Janakiraman Rajalakshmi says
Totally agree with you.
moeped says
bbc is the propaganda machine of elites, that’s all. msm leftist propaganda polluting our society and especially our youth.
Georg says
BBC “Is our response to grooming gangs racist?”
Yes, your lack of concern for underage girls being brutally raped, targeted for their ethnicity/race, beaten, demoralized, convinced their own government didn’t/doesn’t care about them, running cover for their racist and bigoted rapists, and ongoing Orwellian betrayal has traumatized the nation and world.
It just may be that you don’t get away with it and justice reaches you all. Many of us see you.
carpediadem says
The BBC also protected Jimmy Savile, who raped huge numbers of children for years.
The BBC only loves and protects thugs.
FYI says
BBC is so desperate to appear politically correct that when recently there was a discussion about rape of white women in Rotherham U.K,….all of the 4 panellists were…muslim.
No one to represent the white victims of muslim rapists.
Bias,what bias?
BBC
Britainistani
Broadcasting
Cult
epistemology says
Labeling calling a spade a spade racist is the consequence of brainwashing and Western Europeans are brainwashed by muzzies and their apologists. It’s about time to end this nonsense.
As we all know Islam is no race but a racist ideology, as I experienced myself as a Jew and my good friend frrom South Sudan, because he’s black and a Christian.
When it comes to handling black people the KKK is a bunch of choir compared to muzzies, I already mentioned that here on JW.