“Abdul Muhsin Aydeed, a Salafi preacher based in the city, wrote that the call to love people cutting across religious consideration is alien to Islam.”
“Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah ; and those with him are harsh against the disbelievers, merciful among themselves.” (Qur’an 48:29)
“Concept of nationalism is anti-Islam: Salafi leader,” TNN, August 21, 2017 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):
…Rebutting the arguments in the pamphlet ‘One India, One People” brought out by the rival Salafi organization Wisdom Global Islamic Mission, Abdul Muhsin Aydeed, a Salafi preacher based in the city, wrote that the call to love people cutting across religious consideration is alien to Islam….
Aydeed said that nationality was not a binding force for Muslims. “In the eyes of Islam what distinguishes people is the religion itself- those who believe in Islam and those who dont,” he said, adding that Islam is against even Arab nationalism.
Quoting the Saudi Salafi scholar Sheikh Abdul Aziz Ibn Baz, he said nationalism acts as dividing force for Muslims. He said that this is not limited to Indian nationalism but is applicable to all manifestations of nationalism. “For a Muslim what is of paramount importance is his religion, his country comes only next,” he said. Aydeed argues that it is imperative for a Muslim to love a Muslim country even if he is not a citizen of the country. He should wish victory and virtue for the country because “it is part of love for Islam.”
He chose to disagree the comparison of India to a garden in the pamphlet published by Wisdom group. Garden is a place where one sees only beautiful flowers and plants, but there are many unwelcome things in India. “Animals, stones and human organs that cannot be named publicly are worshiped as gods [in] India. How can such a place be called a garden?” he asked.
Aydeed also finds the reference to ‘rich cultural diversity’ in India disgusting. “The cultural diversity in India is a comedy for many,” he said, adding that there are naked ‘people’s leaders’ who addresses Parliament on the one side and there are ‘freakens’ on the other. Aydeed asked the author of the pamphlet to clarify whether countries like Saudi Arabia are ‘poor’ because it doesn’t give freedom for public worship to other religions.
He clarified that criticising plurality in religion doesn’t mean that people of other faith should be killed or their religious signs be eradicated. “What Allah would like to see is not the proliferation of religions, but people accepting Islam. Therefore Muslims are not duty-bound to praise people embracing different religions,” Aydeed said.
marina says
He said it right. Muslims should clear out from the infidel lands that they have infested. Let us infidels live in peace.
Savvy Kafir says
Agreed. They have no business being here. Hatred for non-Muslims is the central theme of their holy book, which commands them, over & over again, to make war on us & subjugate us. That’s a deal-breaker. It should be an OBVIOUS deal-breaker, for all non-Muslims in the West.
John Forbes says
This is another part of the Western Governments stubborn refusal to take any of this seriously or believe that the followers of ISLAM believe that ISLAM & ONLY ISLAM is owed total loyalty to & NOT WESTERN DEMOCRACIES !
The Refusal to even examine , question or consider this very clearly stated stance just gives ISLAM & ITS spread more breathing room !
Michael Copeland says
That Refusal is also dire negligence.
Michael Copeland says
“If we are practicing muslims we are above the law of the land”.
Mustafa Carroll,
CAIR Dallas
Savvy Kafir says
But it’s not just governments who refuse to see Islam for what it is. Many individuals — especially my fellow Lefties — are still woefully ignorant regarding Islam. All that matters to them is the fact that they see some Muslims around them who appear to be nice, peaceful people; so there’s no need to look into it any further: Islam can’t be a problem.
Wellington says
I wish they would, marina, but you see the BIG PROBLEM here is that ALL infidel lands are to be ultimately controlled by Muslims. Only dar-al-Islam eventually and no more dar-al-harb and all that Islamic rot, blah, blah, blah. All of which goes rather “well” with the Islamic concept that loving a non-Muslim is un-Islamic.
In short, Mohammedans WANT IT ALL. And they don’t give a shit about anyone else. Anyone missing this misses a lot. As with all totalitarian systems Islam is possessed of an “us versus them” scenario.
Whether Nazism’s ethnic “them.” Whether Marxism”s socio-economic “them” (i.e., the upper and middle classes) or Islam’s non-believers “them,” it’s just a variation on a theme, the “them” being the totalitarianism du jour the only variable . And Islam is the ONLY totalitarian major religion on earth, hiding as it does behind a religious facade. This is why it is so much trouble, why it is a pain-in-the ass for all the world, why it is the turd in the punch bowl of major religions. Why it sucks through and through.
So, marina, understand that the Islamic world will NEVER let the non-Islamic world live in peace, never mind the “love aspect” which is only a subset of a much BIGGER PROBLEM. And this is why Islam must be ridiculed, attacked, marginalized and eventually placed on the margins of world society, rather as Nazism and the KKK have been. Not there yet. Damn shame.
Max Publius says
Why do people voluntarily call themselves infidels? Is that supposed to be ironic or sarcastic? Muslims are the infidels to another religion. I don’t think it’s useful to deprecate one’s self using the bigot’s language.
Savvy Kafir says
I’m an infidel regarding all religions (unless you count pantheism), so the label works for me.
And, in the context of the war with Islam, I’m proud to be a non-Muslim — an infidel — so I embrace the label that the Allah junkies consider an insult.
Suebe Hatz says
Bravo we are not the infidels they are. I do not believe in the Muslim way, because their is no love in that way of life. Sounds like a Dictatorship and the one they call god doesn’t like what he created. Maybe because he didn’t create man, maybe he is adversary, and would only love the end of humans. Maybe Maybe Maybe. No doubt about it. Wasn’t it said that satan is the father of lies, and isn’t it said that something else is the best deceiver of all. hmm who could that be
KRJ says
But they want to be here: their entire reason for infesting our lands is to conquer and turn us ALL into muslims! So no, they’re on a mission and have been stealthily been gaining ground all over the world.
Savvy Kafir says
Many of them are here to win the West for Islam, by any means necessary.
And some Muslims seem to be here because the U.S. (or Europe or Canada, etc.) is a far nicer place to live than the Islamic hell-hole they came from — but they fail to understand that the backward, undeveloped society they fled are direct results of their religion; so they continue to embrace Islam (which they hold blameless) and, in many cases, would like to see their adopted nation become Islamic.
We need to make it clear to them (and to clueless infidels) that it’s one or the other. You can have a free, prosperous, civilized society — or you can have Islam. And those who choose Islam need to relocate to an Islamic country. That should not be negotiable, because the West cannot survive the Demographic Jihad, if it’s not nipped in the bud.
tim gallagher says
I agree with you KRJ and Savvy Kafir and the other commenters above, it’s an invasion by Muslims. The only possible answer is to ban Muslim migration into all non-Muslim countries. Throw out as many Muslims who have already invaded as we can. The problem is trying to wake up our politicians and a large section of the population, especially in western countries, which are too tolerant. There’s a problem with your idea, Savvy Kafir, of getting Muslims in western nations to choose Islam or the west and leave and relocate to Muslim countries. They won’t go. Once they have made it into western nations, we seem to be stuck with them. They’ll go to endless appeals courts,etc, in order to stay. Keep Muslims out is the only way. I like what Marina says above about “leave us in peace”. I often think how wonderful it would be to never hear the words Islam or Muslim ever again. Just a utopian fantasy of course. But Islam is never ending trouble. Out here in Australia, we have around the same numbers of Buddhists as Muslims. We never hear about Buddhists. They can get along with us and just get on with their peaceful lives.
Lydia says
A confession right out of the horse’s mouth!
They are not about love, but hate.
carol says
And the inherent contradictions such as pacifiers like “We all worship the same God” – so then WHY are we called INFIDELS? Is the man-made “god-construct Islam” more important than the bona fide “God”? We “Infidels” all sadly know the answer to that. Too bad more Muslims don’t wake up.
eagle says
Completely agree with you!! Wahhabist ideology — an austere form of Islam that insists on literal interpretation of the Quran and views those who disagree as enemies.” A practicing Muslim is unfit to be an American citizen. A good practicing Muslim knows the Koran, Sharia Law and the Hadith all require complete submission to Islam, which is antithetical to the US government, the Constitution, and the Republic. All Muslims who attest that the Koran is their life’s guiding principal subscribe to submission to Islam and its form of government and no other. The freedom of speech should allow the truth to come out as an education for the American people to see and hopefully understand the Muslim threat to the American people and the American core beliefs. Think twice before inviting a Muslim into your heart and the community. The Muslim agenda is to push the Sharia Law on the American people and make demands that allow only the Muslims to be above the American law. This is part of the Muslim creed. Look around the world, the Mosques teach only hate for the non-believers of Islam. State Rep. John Bennett is correct and you are correct in voting for State Rep. John Bennett.
Agha Ali Arkhan says
Of course he is right. His argument makes perfect sense. Nevertheless, Muslims can fight for the nation in which they reside.
Savvy Kafir says
Why should we trust any Muslim to be loyal to a free, democratic, non-Islamic government or society? Those of us who are familiar with the Islamic principle of taqiyya find that especially difficult.
Muslims have a religious obligation to win the world for Islam, by any means necessary — and a divine license to deceive non-Muslims, in the service of that agenda.
roger woodhouse says
Islam has to be defeated once again unfortunately.History it seems has to be repeated.Thats what happens when history is not taught.Islam cannot coexist alongside other religions for very long.Sooner or later the ‘agitators’ become heard and the poor deluded amongst their group are recruited to act as cannon fodder for the cause.The weak and naive leaders in the west are a pushover for the radicals .Hence the situation we find ourselves.
Savvy Kafir says
Yep. The Europeans of the 17th Century, knowing what they knew about Islam & Muslim invasions of the West, would never have considered allowing Muslims to immigrate to their countries. It would have been considered suicidal insanity.
I’m pretty sure that Islam-savvy American founding fathers, such as Thomas Jefferson and John Adams, would have taken the same view.
carol says
Roger said…”The weak and naive leaders in the west are a pushover for the radicals .Hence the situation we find ourselves.”
And isn’t it a crock that such supposedly great nations like Canada and the U.S. are tangled up by this pile of blatant horsesh&*?
Alma says
Agha all, you all can also use takiyya like you. Evil muslims will never fight for a nation that doesn’t cater to your evil beliefs.
Suebe Hatz says
As long as they fight for the American ideology, because if they do not like the constitution or our laws then they should go back to where they are well loved by their fellow Muslims. Oh that’s right they might even be killed by them because they are not hard enough. America love it or leave it. Love is the way not submission.
Savvy Kafir says
Muslims who are more devoted to Islam than to freedom & human rights should leave the West. But they won’t. They’re here on a mission.
So we have to make that decision for them.
Jack Diamond says
And if that nation is fighting Muslims, their co-religionists? In that case, risk another Major Hasan of the Fort Hood massacre? Or a Sgt. Hasan Akbar, who killed fellow soldiers (in Kuwait) on the first Iraq deployment rather than fight fellow Muslims? Who is a Muslim’s first loyalty supposed to be to?
Norger says
Exactly. Muslims
can fight for their country until they decide that Islam mandates that they go all Dr. Nidal Hasan on their fellow soldiers.
Savvy Kafir says
It’s unfair (to say the least) to require non-Muslim soldiers to trust their lives to Muslim soldiers who might decide at any moment that their obligation to their religion trumps their obligation to America (or Britain, France, etc.).
Political correctness in the military is a recipe for disaster.
carol says
“Would fight for the nation in which they reside” is not really impressive at all since it would quickly be or become a nation that no Westerner would philosophically or spiritually identify with or wish to be a part of anymore.
carol says
And would there be co-fighters if it were an Islamic nation we fought with? Not likely. Only the liberated would unselfishly pitch in.
carol says
…or those who felt the nation eventually to be THEIRS.
mortimer says
Abdul Muhsin Aydeed said it’s un-Islamic to “love” the DIRTY KUFAAR???
It sure is. Just read the following:
ISLAM HAS A DOCTRINE OF HATE: ‘AL BARAA’ = Islamic Apartheid, Shunning
Al Bughoud = Hatred of Kafirs ‘for the sake of Allah’ or Al Mu’adaat (hatred) is the opposite of Al Muwalaat (love of Muslims), it is:
– To Hate
– To keep distance from
– To be enemy to
– To desert
– To decline to help
– To disrespect
– To put down
– Not to ally with
– Not to support
Allah ordered Muslims to have Baraa (to be cleansed) from the kufaar and from kufr and shirk.
-Imam Abdul-Latif ibn Abdur-Rahman Rahimullah said, “It is not possible for someone to realize Tawheed and act upon it, and yet not be hostile against the mushrikeen. So anyone who isn’t hostile against the mushrikeen, then it cannot be said that he acts upon Tawheed nor that he realizes it.” [ad-Durar as-Saniyyah 8/167]
-“The doctrine of al Walaa wal Baraa is the REAL IMAGE for the actual practice of this faith.” – source “Al Walaa wal Baraa According to the Aqeedah of the Salaf”, by Sheikh Muhammad Saeed al Qatani, authoritative Saudi Sharia lawyer and imam at the Abu Bakr and Al Furqan Mosques in Mecca. – https://islamfuture.wordpress.com/2009/08/20/al-wala-wal-bara-according-to-the-aqeedah-of-the-salaf-parts-123/
–from Sufi scholar Ahmad Sirhindi (1564-1624): “The honour of Islam lies in insulting kufr and kafirs. One who respects the kafirs dishonours the Muslims… The real purpose of levying jiziya on them is to humiliate them to such an extent that they may not be able to dress well and to live in grandeur. They should constantly remain terrified and trembling. It is intended to hold them under contempt and to uphold the honour and might of Islam.”
-from ibn Taymiyya, “Book of Emaan”: “… true believers show animosity and hatred towards disbelievers and never support them.”
-from Umar Sulayman ‘Abd-Allaah al-Ashqar, “Belief in Allah”: “The Muslim should regard the Kuffaar as enemies and hate them because of their kufr, just as he hates their kufr (disbelief) itself.”
-from [Chap.iv] “The Islaamic Concept of al-Walaa’ wal-Baraa’” by Khalid El-Gharib: “… to show enmity to those who show enmity to Allaah and His Messenger”.
(Note: Muslims are to visibly demonstrate their enmity or hatred towards the kufaar)
-from a lecture given by Sheikh Abdullah al-Faisal (H.A.): “The implication of al-Baraa is that one HATES for the sake of Allah (SWT)…Al-Baraa means to recognize who your enemies are and to HATE them and EXTERMINATE them in their Endeavour to get rid of your Deen, al-Islam…Al-Baraa is to HATE the people who propagate Baatil (falsehood)—the Muslim should HATE them and (at least desire to) KILL them when the time comes.”
HATING KAFIRS is normative Islam, rather than an aberration.
Suebe Hatz says
As long as they fight for the American ideology, because if they do not like the constitution or our laws then they should go back to where they are well loved by their fellow Muslims. Oh that’s right they might even be killed by them because they are not hard enough. America love it or leave it. Love is the way not submission.
Dajjal says
love jihad
carol says
Like dogs love their bones.
Georg says
Point of interest: when Muslims speak of the odd “loving” verse in the Koran in order to vouch for its being a peaceable book… those verses are not intended for us non-believers. So it is a kind of sleight of hand. Non-Muslims who live outside of Islamic control are part of “dar-al-harb or” “house of war”. Islam — ever the master of nuance — has divided the world into two parts, with the other being “dar-al-Islam” or “house of Islam”. Try and guess their sentiments regarding our House of War. One needn’t a PhD in Islamic exegesis to make a prediction as to the behavior of the ROP.
And nice to see this Salafist unhappy that another Salafist group isn’t Salafy enough. Bodes real well for his non-Muslim neighbors.
mortimer says
Georg is correct. Moreover, the ‘peaceful’ verses in the Koran of Mecca are overruled and abrogated and rendered obsolete by the warlike jihad verses in the Koran of Medina.
About 100 verses are abrogated by the Verse of the Sword Koran 9.5.
Georg says
Important distinction as well. Basically, it’s lies on top of lies.
mortimer says
Islam is constant BAIT-AND-SWITCH… this is the normative behavior of criminals used to lure the ‘mark’ into a cunning trap. Once trapped with no way out, the ‘mark’ is stung and betrayed.
Islam is a set-up.
mortimer says
Abdul Aziz bin Abdullah bin Baz was a Saudi Arabian Islamic scholar and Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia from 1993 until his death in 1999.
Bin Baz issued a fatwa authorizing a wealth tax to support the Mujahideen during the anti-Soviet jihad.
In 1966, when Ibn Baz was vice-president of the Islamic University of Medina, he wrote an article denouncing Riyadh University for teaching the “falsehood” that the earth rotates and orbits the sun.
In his 1966 article, ibn Baz claimed that the sun orbited the earth, and that “the earth is fixed and stable, spread out by God for mankind and made a bed and cradle for them, fixed down by mountains lest it shake”.
He also issued a fatwa against women driving cars, which in the West may have been his most well known ruling. “Depravity leads to the innocent and pure women being accused of indecencies. Allah has laid down one of the harshest punishments for such an act to protect society from the spreading of the causes of depravity. Women driving cars, however, is one of the causes that lead to that.”
Georg says
Sounds like a pretty dim bulb. And a creep. Evidently that qualifies him to be in charge.
Chand says
This Baz and Aydeed are just stupid, mechanical mouthpieces of the Saudis, espousing their poisonous Salafi Wahaabbi ideology. The Saudi use their wealth to spread their literal interpretation of the Koran globally with impunity.
World powers need to confront the Saudi govt. in all global forums and challenge their spreading of Salafi Wahaabism which is posing a grave danger to humanity. It must be done on all fronts………… legally, diplomatically, culturally. This is a human right issue.
They need to relentlessly pressurize the Saudis and global Islamic bodies to edit the Koran, deleting objectionable passages and make that abridged version the official, acceptable Koran for everybody.
They must not be allowed to use their money to ‘buy’ off poor Muslims all over the world, jeopardize their future and keep them in ignorance and darkness. All donations to Madrasas, schools and Mosques must be monitored.
This should be done on the same war footing as in tackling deadly epidemics. Jihadism is a disease that has to be attacked on all fronts.
mortimer says
Chand wrote: “attack jihadism”. Western governments SHOULD be attacking jihad IDEOLOGICALLY and they are doing almost NOTHING in this respect. Muslims will stop conducting jihad ONLY if they feel that Islam may NOT be true.
A man filled with doubts about the truth of Islam CANNOT put his life on the line for fables. To introduce SUBSTANTIAL DOUBT into the minds of Muslims regarding the truth of Islam is the greatest service to the world.
Debi Brand says
“India: Muslim preacher says call to love non-Muslims is un-Islamic”
Well of course it is.
mortimer says
Debi wrote: “love non-Muslims un-Islamic”. Al WALAA WAL BARAA is an essential doctrine. Muslims who do not show hostility towards the kufaar will not be admitted to Islamic paradise.
Vajapeya says
Are the goddamn secular Indian politicians listening to this?
sidney penny says
Sickular Indian Politicians
mortimer says
Vajapeya, we have to write to them… an insider told me it’s best to telephone them.
FYI says
Love of others…?
Well,It certainly is…alien to islam…
But then so is Love of God alien to islam,probably because allah completely missed those all important Two chief Commandments, didn’t he?
Another thing that is alien to islam it seems is obedience to God’s Original Commandments.It is amazing how allah twists them all{thou shalt not kill,thou shalt not steal,thou shalt not commit adultery,thou shalt not bear false witness etc.. turn into.. slay the unbelievers,jizya taxing infidels,seizing women and using them a s sex slaves,lying by taqqiya etc}.It is even more amazing how muslims don’t see the problem with the fact that what allah teaches does not actually conform to God’s Original Commandments.
And it seems that neither allah nor his followers appear to have understood the importance of actually obeying ANY of God’s Commandments either (obedience to which in the Judeo-Christian or Biblical version of God is regarded as.. a sign of Love for God).
allah doesn’t get that.
allah also doesn’t understand the ludicrousness of his well-known contempt for the Jews(..And the Christians but it is mostly the Jews that allah despises..)k(9:30)
A god who hates is NOT the True God!
Perhaps those essential Two Chief Commandments were lost in translation when the angel jibreel,(“the enemy of the Jews”)
gave that perfect book to the most perfect man that ever lived,the anti-Semitic muhammed;not much room for love there-especially towards Jews.
The absence of those essential Two Chief Commandments (found in Judaism and Christianity but completely missing in islam)totally misrepresents God so that what we have in allah is a warped shadow and a religion that allows its followers to subscribe to hatred and violence.
It makes it easier for the True God{of Love} to separate the wheat from the chaff:those who think they are free to hate gravitate towards allah but those people (..of any religion or none..)who see the truth about God as revealed in the Two Chief Commandments will move in that direction instead….
mortimer says
FYI, the Golden Rule is not contained in the Koran because ‘Allah’ doesn’t want Muslims to ‘love their neighbor’ … they are to love only fellow Muslims. Koran 48.29 (above) is a complete contradiction of the Golden Rule.
S R Wakankar says
This interpretation of Islam is not correct. Real Islam teaches love for non-Muslim, not hate.Because he is afterall the non-Muslim who has to turn Muslim one day. So he is more imp. for Islam than one who has already become Muslim.
It is like farm and yield relationship. Both are imp. to each other. Without farm there can be no yield. Farm is everything. In the same way how can there be Muslims if there are not non-Muslims?
So the Salfi/Wahhabi ideology is not truly Islamic. It is sheer Arab Imperialism. Real Islam is Love for non-Muslim,not hate. Allah is not Muslim, He is non-Muslim but how much all Muslim love Him. In the same way, non-Muslim has to be loved not hated.So he could join the community of Islam (the Muslim Ummah) one day. If he is hated, he would be distanced and become scared.
So it is is love, not hate which is TRUE Islam.
Norger says
I wish you were right. Among other things, the Salafi/Wahhabi ideology is the version of Islam that is being most aggressively spread throughout the world today, thanks to the Saudis.
And if you believe that all the world should live under Sharia law, or that apostates and blasphemers should be killed,you’re not much better than the Wahabbis.
It certainly isn’t our place to decide what is “true” Islam. However, our leaders need to understand that there is a MAINSTREAM version of Islam that is completely antithetical to our Constitution, our freedom, and our way of life. Islam is dangerous, period.
Jaladhi says
Hey, hey,.. where did you learn your Islam?? FYI, what this “preacher” is saying pure Islam as taught by Muhammad. Go read Quran, hadiths and sira to learn the vile core of Islam, and you will forget the lies of “Islam is peace”, “Islam is all love,” etc garbage in a moment!
Learn the real Islam – leave Islam and join the humanity!
Jack Diamond says
“Muhammad is God’s Apostle. Those who follow him are ruthless to the unbelievers but merciful to one another.” Qur’an 48:29
“Allah commanded His Messenger to strive hard against the disbelievers and the hypocrites and be harsh against them, their refuge is Hell.” 9:73
“You will not find any people who believe in Allah and the Last Day loving those who resist Allah and His Messenger, even though they be their fathers, sons, brothers or kindred.” 58:22
“Fight (q-t-l kil, slaughter, massacre) those who believe not in Allah nor the LAst Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the Religion of Truth (Islam) even if they are People of the Book, until they pay the jizya (ransom) with willing submission and feel themselves subdued (i.e. humbled and humiliated).” 9:29
Have you see unicorns as well?
aniruddha biswas says
India has many scumbags of this variety. They eat here, live here, procreate like rabbits with their four wives here, and owe allegiance not to the country that has given them every freedom on earth, but to other countries many of whom have sworn to destroy India simply because it is a Hindu majority country, and is a bulwark against the total domination of Islam.
However, the current Indian government headed by a patriot, Narendra Modi, is aware of this cancer, and is working slowly but surely to rid the nation of this scourge.
Just yesterday, the Indian government succeeded in getting the country’s apex legal authority, the Supreme Court of India, to strike down a practice widely prevalent among Indian muslims – triple talaq.
Triple talaq meant that muslim men could summarily divorce their wives by uttering the word ‘talaq’ thrice in succession.
As a result, thousands of muslim women were left to fend for themselves, even as their husbands moved on to younger women. Some of them were divorced simply by virtue of a whatsapp message or an sms text that read ‘talaq talaq talaq.
The day-to-day practice of islam is riddled with abhorrent and immoral practices that even to a neutral observer goes against the grain of humanity.
Yet the majority of muslims resist any change in these practices, either by threatening violence, or by playing the victim card.
It has taken India 70 years to wake up to the fifth column that wants every right in India, yet refuses to sing the Indian national anthem, saying it is un-islamic.
It is shocking that these snakes have been nurtured by India, and are now being widely welcomed in Europe and other Western countries.
The only thing to say is that those who refuse to learn the lessons of history, are condemned to repeat it.
Every muslim living in a non-muslim country owes his allegiance outside.
They will never ever integrate, but only become more fanatical or as the western media says ‘radicalized’ with time.
It’s a mystery to me why Europe still allows them in.
Every one of those already in would most likely be thinking the same way as the traitor in this article, and sooner rather than later, this enormous mass of people who have contempt and hatred for their host country will begin to make their presence felt.
What a sad state of affairs indeed!
Karina says
I’m sick of these excuses of ‘oh that’s just Wahhabism so no big deal’ or ‘That’s not real Islam’.
If he’s allegedly not a real Muslim, then the so-called real Muslims should’ve excommunicated him something, instead of giving him a platform to speak as a Muslim.
Given all the jihad terror occurring all around the world, the fact that Muslims seldom assimilate and believe their religion is the only way, having no tolerance for other beliefs (Muslim persecution of Christians, and murdering ex-Muslims)…it’s true that Muslims have no love or respect for non-Muslims and their cultures/beliefs.
John A. Marre says
Clear evidence that Islam is not compatible with civilization and that its members must be kept out.
sidney penny says
Finally, Abdul Muhsin Aydeed, said the right thing.
When a 60 Minutes reporter asked an Iman if he would like the world to be Islamic,The Iman said why not.
mortimer says
Love and Hate, Islamic Style (by Bill Warner, PhD)
There is a concept in Islam called al-Walaa wal-Baraa. Walaa is basically allegiance or love (for Muslims). Baraa is enmity or hate (of kafirs). So the concept is to love Muslims and Islam and to hate kafirs and their civilization. Walaa and baraa are love and hate, Islamic style.
Since Islam is based upon submission and duality, walaa and baraa are the perfect illustration of duality. To love believers and hate kafirs is pure dualism. But how important is walaa/baraa? A study of the Koran shows that its priorities are:
• Allah is the only god
• Mohammed is Allah’s prophet
• walaa/baraa
It is a core principle of Islamic political doctrine. The Koran devotes over half of its words to how foul and evil the kafirs are. There is not one good or sympathetic word for the kafirs. If you don’t believe Mohammed, then Allah hates you:
40:35 They who dispute the signs of Allah [kafirs] without authority having reached them are greatly hated by Allah and the believers.
If Allah hates, then a Muslim should hate, as well. This hate is not due to moral failings. No, a kafir is hated for the simple reason that the kafir does not think that Mohammed is a prophet. [If Mohammed is not a prophet, then the Koran is fiction, and Islam is meaningless.] In the Sira we find that Islam destroys cultured, wise people of high moral standards because they do not believe Mohammed. It is not personal; it is simply Islam.
The greatest Islamic sin is not mass murder, rape, theft or child molestation. No, becoming an apostate (one who leaves Islam to become a kafir) is the greatest evil in the sight of Allah. So if Abdullah leaves Islam to become a Christian (or an atheist), he is worse than Hitler. The hatred of an apostate is another example of baraa.
But Ahmed, the professional engineer, at your work does not say he hates kafirs. In fact, he says that he loves America. But, if Ahmed is a real Muslim, then he follows the Koran and its says (in 14 different verses):
3:117 Believers! Do not become friends with anyone except your own people.
How clear can this be? A Muslim should be friends only with Muslims and not with kafirs– walaa/baraa. If Ahmed is actually your friend, then he is not a Muslim in that moment. If he is a Muslim, then he may be friendly, but he is not your friend. That is the nature of baraa. His contempt is covered with deceit. Mohammed repeatedly told Muslims to use deceit with kafirs.
Walaa/baraa is the perfect summation of Islam’s dualistic ethical system. A Muslim does not kill, lie, or steal from another Muslim. Kafirs are not included in this list. A kafir may be treated well or a kafir may be abused, deceived or killed. In Islam, there is no Golden Rule.
Walaa/baraa destroys all empathy and sympathy for kafirs. The walaa/baraa principle is duality at the personal level while dar al Islam/dar al harb (abode of submission/abode of war) is duality at the political level. Islam is incapable of being our friend and only loves itself. But how many kafirs think that if we are good enough to Muslims, then Muslims will love us?
Why do we deceive ourselves?
roger woodhouse says
Our governments attempt to deceive us but only succeed in deceiving themselves.Their plan is to keep us in the dark with platitudes and false information re this evil cult for as long as possible.Anyone taking a little trouble to investigate this religion wiil see the folly of this plan.Our failure to promote our own Christian heritage due entirely to left wing liberal policies while allowing into the West people who already indoctrinated are given free range to promote this backward cult is wholly to blame
Jaladhi says
Why anybody, and “especially the Indians” are surprised with what this “preacher” is saying. That is pure Islam full of hate and vile and nothing else and all this coming from Quran. He is simply following allah’s ordrs and parroting what Mo said 1400 years back. But would Indians learn anything from him – NO, they would just disregard him as a nut case since most Muslims are not like him!
Ha, ha, .. you wanna bet?
davej says
Societies age like humans age, eventually the individual cells fail to reproduce, death arrives and only if the individual has reproduced will the society live on. The West has aged out to the point of weakness and childlessness. It is likely to succumb to any invader that is, on average, younger and more fecund.
This process can be accelerated if the invaders are fiercely supremacist and if we refuse to uphold our own system of laws and customs. “Welcome refugees” and special rights for these people is a form of civilizational surrender.
Dacritic says
“Salafi”? Isn’t it easier to just call him… Muslim?