Mobeen Azhar is either ignorant of Islam’s sanction of the sexual enslavement of Infidel women, or hoping that his audience will be. He is trying to dismiss as insanity the idea that the Muslim rape gangs’ behavior was Islamic, and hence foreclose upon honest discussion of it.
Here are some of the facts he is ignoring: the seizure of Infidel girls and their use as sex slaves is sanctioned in the Qur’an. According to Islamic law, Muslim men can take “captives of the right hand” (Qur’an 4:3, 4:24, 33:50). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet! Lo! We have made lawful for you your wives to whom you have paid their dowries, and those whom your right hand possesses of those whom Allah has given you as spoils of war” (33:50). 4:3 and 4:24 extend this privilege to Muslim men in general. The Qur’an says that a man may have sex with his wives and with these slave girls: “The believers must win through, those who humble themselves in their prayers; who avoid vain talk; who are active in deeds of charity; who abstain from sex, except with those joined to them in the marriage bond, or the captives whom their right hands possess, for in their case they are free from blame.” (Qur’an 23:1-6)
The rape of captive women is also sanctioned in Islamic tradition:
Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): 0 Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-’azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born. (Sahih Muslim 3371)
It is also in Islamic law: “When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled.” (Umdat al-Salik O9.13)
The Egyptian Sheikh Abu-Ishaq al-Huwayni declared in May 2011 that “we are in the era of jihad,” and that meant Muslims would take slaves. In a subsequent interview he elaborated:
Jihad is only between Muslims and infidels. Spoils, slaves, and prisoners are only to be taken in war between Muslims and infidels. Muslims in the past conquered, invaded, and took over countries. This is agreed to by all scholars—there is no disagreement on this from any of them, from the smallest to the largest, on the issue of taking spoils and prisoners. The prisoners and spoils are distributed among the fighters, which includes men, women, children, wealth, and so on.
When a slave market is erected, which is a market in which are sold slaves and sex-slaves, which are called in the Qur’an by the name milk al-yamin, “that which your right hands possess” [Koran 4:24]. This is a verse from the Qur’an which is still in force, and has not been abrogated. The milk al-yamin are the sex-slaves. You go to the market, look at the sex-slave, and buy her. She becomes like your wife, (but) she doesn’t need a (marriage) contract or a divorce like a free woman, nor does she need a wali. All scholars agree on this point—there is no disagreement from any of them. […] When I want a sex slave, I just go to the market and choose the woman I like and purchase her.
Around the same time, on May 25, 2011, a female Kuwaiti politician, Salwa al-Mutairi, also spoke out in favor of the Islamic practice of sexual slavery of non-Muslim women, emphasizing that the practice accorded with Islamic law and the parameters of Islamic morality.
A merchant told me that he would like to have a sex slave. He said he would not be negligent with her, and that Islam permitted this sort of thing. He was speaking the truth. I brought up [this man’s] situation to the muftis in Mecca. I told them that I had a question, since they were men who specialized in what was halal, and what was good, and who loved women. I said, “What is the law of sex slaves?”
The mufti said, “With the law of sex slaves, there must be a Muslim nation at war with a Christian nation, or a nation which is not of the religion, not of the religion of Islam. And there must be prisoners of war.”
“Is this forbidden by Islam?” I asked.
“Absolutely not. Sex slaves are not forbidden by Islam. On the contrary, sex slaves are under a different law than the free woman. The free woman must be completely covered except for her face and hands. But the sex slave can be naked from the waist up. She differs a lot from the free woman. While the free woman requires a marriage contract, the sex slave does not—she only needs to be purchased by her husband, and that’s it. Therefore the sex slave is different than the free woman.”
In January 2016, a female al-Azhar professor stated that Allah allowed Muslims to rape non-Muslim women in order to humiliate them.
The savage exploitation of girls and young women is, unfortunately, a cross-cultural phenomenon, but only in Islamic law does it carry divine sanction. And that sanction must be discussed if anything effective is ever going to be done to end this abuse.
“BBC Newsnight guest claims Newcastle grooming gang should not be considered ‘Muslim,'” by Vincent Wood, Express, August 11, 2017 (thanks to Lookmann):
MEMBERS of grooming gangs should not be considered Muslim due to the un-Islamic nature of their vile actions, a high profile member of the community has claimed.
In an impassioned Newsnight debate on the role of the Islamic community after the heinous incidents, one-panel member protested at blame being levelled at British Muslims.
It follows a court hearing earlier this week which saw 17 men and one woman convicted of rape, sexual assault, human trafficking and inciting prostitution as the city of Newcastle was added to the growing list of UK towns blighted by the evil grooming gangs.
Muhbeen Hussain, founder of the group British Muslim Youth, claimed the sex gang incident was not a Muslim problem in an emotional speech which brought on criticism from controversial columnist Katie Hopkins.
Speaking on Newsnight Mr Hussain said: “Islam is a religion of all cultures.
“You find Japanese Muslims, you find Indonesian Muslims, in fact, the largest Muslim population in the world is in Indonesia, and to say somehow this is a Muslim problem?
“Let’s have a look at these grooming gangs.
“These grooming gangs were individuals that were using alcohol, using drugs and actually having ‘sessions’ exploiting these young girls.
“I don’t know what’s Islamic about drinking alcohol, drugs and exploiting young girls.”
Shortly after the show, Katie Hopkins tweeted: “Breaking, Muslims say Muslim grooming gangs are not a Muslim issue”
But Mr Hussein doubled down on his statements, replying: “I stand by my words. There is nothing Islamic about these vile criminals”
Filmmaker Mobeen Azhar, who also appeared on the show, said it was time for the Muslim community to address issues surrounding women, sex and sexuality.
In response to Mr Hussain, he said: “When you hear these stories emerging you wince when you hear Muslim names.
“And as a community, we are really uncomfortable and we are really used to reacting.
“We are really used to reacting and saying ‘this has nothing to do with us, this has nothing to do with our community’.
“And I don’t think anyone in their right mind would say ‘ this is a theological issue, they’re doing this because they are good Muslims’….
Krazy Kafir says
When will we see an honest Muslim? I guess when we do, it will be an apostate. So, we’re back to not seeing one.
BC says
At least he admits there are ‘bad’ Muslims, that is a step forward. Unfortunately that allows them to divorce their actions from Islam entirely. When Islam is their justification.
John Forbes says
This CHILD RAPING EXERCISE has been covered up vigorously denied by the Government , Police & the BBC for over TWO DECADES !
Now that it has been dragged into the sunlight there is still a concerted attempt to bury this & this must not be allowed to happen !
The MUSLIM WIDER COMMUNITY cannot NOT have known full well & this is born out by the support the Child Rape Monsters receive at COURT !
The comments :White Women & Children are TRASH & UP FOR IT are widely quoted & often voiced in many places including the courts !
These are racist taunts & they are finally being acknowledged as such & let us see if the LAW will respond !!
I suspect that the LEGAL response will be muted at best & then quietly forgotten conveniently !!
It is the SHAME of SOCIETY that the VULNERABLE have been ABANDONED to the FOLLOWERS of an IDEOLOGY that HATES WHITES ,DEMOCRACY & FREE SPEECH by their OWN GOVERNMENT & POLICE FORCES !!
WorkingClassPost says
This Hussein guy needn’t worry…
Nobody talks about ‘good’ muslims, in any context
Tangata says
Too often Muslims react by immediately and vehemently denying that this is not Islam… Yet why is it that these gangs of criminals are of Islamic persuasion? Why is it also that almost every terrorist today carrying out atrocities against humanity and women are of Islamic persuasion? Why is it that the Jihadi 9/11 bombers drinking and womanising up to the day before their dastardly deed? Impassioned and vehement denial about Islam’s role in these acts of savage brutality does not change the fact that Islamic ideology and doctrine does teach adherents to rape and murder in the name of Islam, Allah and the prophet.
CogitoErgoSum says
Per Muhammad, when telling a lie better serves the interests of Islam than telling the truth, it is permissible to tell a lie.The self-serving lie carries the stamp of approval granted by the self-serving, lying false prophet himself. When a Muslim speaks about his religion, not a word from his mouth should be taken as true. (When a prophet condones lying to spread his religion, should that prophet himself ever be believed?)
Ren says
Muslim rape gangs “doing this because they want to emulate their prophet Muhammad”.
PRCS says
This has been discussed here at JW in the past.
Are they grooming and raping just white girls?
Do Qur’an or Sunna single out white girls/women for capture and use as sex slaves, or are girls/women of all colors, ethnicities, races, religions (other than Muslims) fair game?
If they were complying with Islam’s texts concerning sex with captured girls/women, why do they need to “groom” them? Shouldn’t they just take them?
While they are Muslims, are they committing kidnap and rape in the name of Islam or because they’re criminals?
R Russell says
I suggest you read the Koran and the Hadiths. The sexual exploitation of the kuffr is encouraged. That is their religion. They are doing it quietly because our country as yet isn’t openly complying with sharia. It wont be long now for our idiotic government still thinks the ‘good’ Muslims don’t do these things.
PRCS says
Oh, right, I haven’t read Qur’an or Sunna, yet.
Guess I’d better get on that, eh?
——-
“The sexual exploitation of the kuffr is encouraged.”
And the answer to the question–assuming they’re only targeting white girls/women: why aren’t they capturing and enslaving other “unbelieving” girls/women?
CogitoErgoSum says
My guess would be racism.
PRCS says
COS,
Considering what at least one of the said about white girls/women, that is my thought, too.
Racist criminals.
I do wonder–if it was only white females they were targeting–what answer they gave for motive during trial and sentencing. Knowing that they could lie, it is–nonetheless–difficult to imagine that they cited Islam’s teachings in reply.
R Russell says
No not racist, just carrying out the dictates of their religion.
http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/birmingham-sikh-tv-channel-accused-13468017
If you want a light-hearted look at what Islam teaches and the conduct it encourages in the ‘Faithful’ try some of David Wood’s youtube videos.
For those who cannot be bothered to read the Koran and Hadiths which are available online in English, he will quote them for you in context.
CogitoErgoSum says
I’m wondering if racism is not an offshoot of the mindset ingrained in many Muslims from a lifetime of exposure to the Islamic attitude that non-Muslims are “filthy” and of no value in the eyes of their god, Allah. Since the idea is now being pushed that “Muslim” is a race in itself (and skin color is the most obvious way to identify one’s race) these people think that most Muslims are brown and that most people who are white are therefore not Muslims. They see white people as “vile creatures” who are not quite human. To these Muslims the white “subhuman creatures” are despised by Allah and should be humiliated so a good way to please Allah is to stick it to the white man through the rape and degradation of the white man’s daughter, or his wife or his girlfriend. So I’m still thinking a combination of religion and racism is involved in all this.
PRCS says
COS,
Yes, “wondering if racism is not an offshoot of the mindset ingrained in many Muslims”, re: Muslims or not based upon skin color, could very well be the case.
Benedict says
Both good and bad Muslims are employed by Allah and both kinds of Muslims will get their rewards in heaven. The terrorists and the suicide bombers will be rewarded most abundantly.
FYI says
What made me laugh about that interview and confirmed my belief about the BBC is that
ALL the 4 panellists were ….muslim.
How about that for impartiality and objectivity then?
Of course they deny the truth about those islamic beliefs which sanction sexual slavery of women:
perhaps they should read what their anti-Semitic,anti-Christian,Commandment-violating,misogynistic moon god allah says in his perfect book the koran … and perhaps they should note the disgracefully immoral woman-enslaving behavior of their “prophet” muhammed.Such appalling example(Sunnah) should never be followed by any morally decent person!
An all-muslim panel with no one representing the women victims:do you hear the silence of the feminists?
Where are they?
The politically correct,lefty-liberal BBC..
Britanistani
Broadcasting
Corporation
Ade says
well I am glad someone can laugh about it !
Mindy Robinson says
What he is doing has always been done by muslims in the name of islam. quran teaches them how to subdue peoples and nations. Part of the war plan includes lying to “infidels” to advance islam, hells tool.
UNCLE VLADDI says
So Islamo-spokesturd Muhbeen Hussain just tried to claim that, because muslims come in all races and backgrounds, (i.e: because they’re an equal-opportunity global crime-gang) they can’t be held responsible for their crimes.
Suggesting that we infidels should ignore Islam’s most official infidel-raping and enslaving tenets is ludicrous – and more so , it’s implication is inherently RACIST!
His assertion implies that the grooming gangs didn’t rape kids because they were ALL incidentally muslims, but only because SOME of them were ALSO members of a rape-prone RACE.
Ade says
the only “good muslim” ………….
Irene Brekelmans says
How can any one in this age still believe that there is a God and a prophet who are commanding you to act out all those vile things. God and Jesus are propheting Love, Light and peace. That is the only way !!!
Sorry , but Mohammed did not get his 72 virgins either, nobody does who was and is expecting this.
And yeh, where are the feminists, you don’t hear a kick from them, it is all political correct, isn’t it?
Sarc.)
Even sarcasme has been thrown out. They are banning us from a lot, it will not help them. The truth shall be known.