This is not the Jihad Watch YouTube channel, which still remains (so far); nor was it an account I had any association with. This was simply a collection of some of videos featuring me that this man had made for his own reference.
YouTube user “NoNo Boddy” sent me this screenshot, and explained:
As far as I recall it was just your stuff. Nothing crazy
I don’t actively use the channel at all really just was using it to bookmark stuff.
I’d actually forgotten I made it. I didn’t actually know if it was public or not. To be honest I didn’t know they come in public and private.
As I said when PayPal reinstated Jihad Watch’s account, the Left’s war on the freedom of speech is by no means over. They are determined to cut foes of jihad terror off from all means of communication.
manxcat says
It looks like this “new” more “caring”, and less “judgmental” progressive society that our elites are laboring to bring us* is going to be Islam / Jihad compliant
*whether we want it or not…
Miriam Feldstein Case says
You are most defiantly correct!!!!!!
manxcat says
Dear Miriam,
Thanks for your kind reply to my post. In the dangerous times we’re living in today, I think we should remember: “If God is for us, then who can be against us…” likewise, if God is against us–then no one can help us. I firmly believe that the armies of very powerful people (and their dupes) who surround us on all sides can not ultimately win the all-out war we’re in…
Jon Sobieski says
…and the Gods will strike you! For if you persist in your fitna, you will be stricken repeatedly and banished from the land. The YouTube God Google, holy book. Aug 24:2017 So it is wirtten.
Lydia says
Youtube will definitely be stricken by God one fine day. You can take that one to the bank.
Allan Mandrowski says
We must break the left’s monopoly on mass media. Get off google, get off PayPal, get off YouTube, get off twitter, get off Facebook.
We must find or create alternative services providing the same without bias.
The only way for them to learn that we value Freedom above all is to abandon them and let them feel financially that we disagree with their left PC nonsense bias.
gravenimage says
Many people use Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube. We should not have to cede all this to the dishonest Left.
mortimer says
In the 1950s and 1960s, American ELITES all took bribes to ENDORSE SMOKING… even though there was evidence that it causes cancer.
Today, the ELITES are being BRIBED BY GULF OIL MONEY to endorse Islam and jihad… even though there is OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE that JIHAD is killing THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE every year.
There are between 5 and 50 JIHAD-RELATED DEATHS every single day of the year in 2017.
Westman says
This view of Google/YouTube motives may be missing the primary motive: Monetary.
YouTube was monetized after being developed as an ad-free platform. Mainstream advertising agencies limit major advertising to non-controversial media in response to the demands of their clients. Removing controversial videos and users is in Google’s YouTube monetary interests no matter what justification, real or fabricated, is crafted.
“Cleaning up” YouTube actually means enhancing revenue by all means. From their perspective, there such entity as “free speech” in advertising. Buy it.
Westman says
Ccorrection: there is no such entity as “free speech” in advertising. They want you to buy it.
Daniel Triplett says
Maybe someone could settle for less advertising revenue, for the sake of unrestricted messaging.
Instead of being a greedy Zuckerberg with $80 Billion+, maybe someone could settle for just $1 Billion. I’d do it.
b.a. freeman says
well, yes and no. yes, the desire for money is almost certainly part of the cause, but they only block *one* side of every question. the “no” part is that people on the right don’t riot, destroy property, and shoot people with whom they disagree as a general rule, while it sure looks to me like people on the left *will* (as a general rule). in your scenario, that could explain why only the left is promoted and only the right is suppressed.
however, if one truly desires to be inoffensive while offering an outlet for people to express themselves, one would find it easier – and cheaper – to allow *everything* to be posted. in order to “police” the site, one could solicit concerned citizens, as well as SJWs and other nazis, to volunteer to screen posts and report “offensive” and “dangerous” ones. if reported posts don’t induce people of any ethnicity, religious belief, political persuasion, or any other group association to kill, steal, rape, molest children, or commit any other crime, one could tell the reporter that nothing can be done about it. since fakebook, goolag, twister, et al., are not doing that, and are in fact actively promoting one side (against all evidence, i might add) and suppressing its opposition, my guess is that the leftists running the company currently value their own beliefs more than money. these guys are rolling in money, so they can afford to milk the cash cow for a while.
the market will eventually catch up to the nazis running these companies, but that can take a *very* long time; i have seen companies coast on their reputations for *decades*, continuing to delude banks and investors year after year, until finally the loss of business actually forces them to close the doors. by the time these nazis are actually shut down by the market, the nazis might actually be running the country. given the company they keep (pious muslims), they probably won’t be doing that for long before we all have to say the shahadah or die.
Japetto Donatelli says
This is bizarre. So the videos themselves are not a violation (as it should be) but creating an anthology of such videos is? They’ve gone mad, literally mad. They’re just shooting into the dark at this point, “killing” and wounding any one with a single toe dipped in the right side of the pond.
We’re going to have to work hard to expose the discriminatory and biased political agenda Google is waging against conservative views. I think they’re being extra d*ck heads because of that big fine they got for unethical business practices (Actually “illegal” business practices according to Margrethe Vestager, an anti trust official) Or maybe they’re simply leftist creeps more considered about their ad revenue than treating people fairly. Whatever the reason, it has to end.
RonaldB says
Actually, the fines you mention are a huge part of the problem. Services like YouTube and Facebook are subject to fines and lawsuits and of course, discrimination and hostile-workplace lawsuits. So, they are obligated to take pro-active steps, such as creating software to automatically filter content. If the software makes mistakes or angers people, it is still far cheaper than being exposed to endless fines and lawsuits.
So, the solution to overreach by these massive service providers is not more government oversight, which is a tempting path over the cliff, but a huge withdrawal of government regulation and legal liability for the fainting spells of all employees.
I am convinced that Googles firing of Vic Damore had a lot to do with the fear of lawsuits by hysterical females claiming the hostile workplace interfered with their safety.
Westman says
Perhaps the best solution is recognizing that Google and the like are becoming monopolies that should be broken up. Google, “The Blob”, has its tentacles on, content, hardware, operating systems, and distribution means of which Microsoft could only dream.
Japetto Donatelli says
Services like YouTube and Facebook are subject to fines and lawsuits and of course, discrimination and hostile-workplace lawsuits.
But by censoring conservative or controversial views they are violating the principle of free speech and therefore discriminating against those they attack. Censorship itself is a kind of hate speech, albeit of the passive aggressive kind. When they unduly censor their clientele they are themselves guilty of hate speech. They don’t best serve themselves in the long run by undermining the 1st Amendment principle that undergirds their work, which is the principle that all people deserve to freely express their thoughts without fear of censure or violence. And pulling the plug on someone’s views is just that, an act of violence. It may seem harmless to some if it only requires pushing a button on a keyboard. But the consequence can be as inhumane and harmful as sewing the mouth of a slave. Even if some express in the harshest terms their thoughts on islam they still should not be denied their right to be outraged, disrespectful, or even irrational. By censoring such views Google is in effect saying they agree with those that say that islam is above criticism and that any opposing views are unworthy regardless of their individual merits. Once they enslave our ideas on islam they remove all intellectual opposition to the doctrines and ideas we oppose. If this practice becomes widespread across all platforms, such censorship will result in the unchecked spread of that violent ideology, causing more death and destruction where it lives. So it’s no small thing that they do this. It’s Orwellian in effect and leaves them looking like willing conspirators in a propaganda war against our nation’s future security.
The 1st amendment is on their side if they’d only show the courage to defend it. F*ck Germany, if we cave to them then we’ll have to cave for anyone with the tiniest hair up their a$$. At that point it simply becomes a flagging contest where everyone get’s the digital firing squad for simply voicing an opinion some cluck didn’t like. By acting this way Google is setting a precedent that will lead to their own marginalization and diminution. Some might say this will all result in a nicer more pleasant internet. It won’t. It will lead to an insipid version of humanity, devoid of any real meaning or purpose, garnering little respect or interest. Hatred won’t be eliminated online, it will only be more subtle and easier to chew, while real world hatred is left unchanged.
b.a. freeman says
fear of lawsuits has a lot to do with goolag’s practices, but the recent problem is that they changed their guidelines for reviewers of “problem” channels to include “hate speech” and the like. of course, every dedicated hard-core leftist, as well as all the unthinking leftists created by the indoctrination system (excuse me; i mean “education” system), knows that anything *not* leftist is hate speech that *must* be blocked. goolag has more money than any other organization, and an army of lawyers at their beck and call, so of any non-governmental group or individual on the planet, they have the least to fear. i won’t give them this one; they’re leftist nazis.
Joe says
That was my impression as well. How could YouTube be offended by bookmarks of their own product?
strong aingel says
By now everyone ought to realise “community” pertains only to #muh. Western Societies, without referendum or check, are being dictated to by Companies and Organisations who have no legal entitlement so to do. A Commercial Lien, properly applied, is the resolution to this.. Clearly muh, already engaged in war a with “the West” they declared, are being given Aid and Comfort by Tax Dodging beach boys and their chums in high office ..
John A. Marre says
Nothing more than the left ending “Freedom of Speech.” It’s gone. If you don’t want to die at the hands of a Muslim, and you say something about it, you are targeted for persecution. It was a nice illusion, while it lasted. Get Spencer’s book on Freedom of Speech before Amazon refuses to sell it.
It was a nice country while it lasted.
gravenimage says
Some of us are still fighting, John. Robert Spencer is one of them.
anti-SJW says
Who determines so-called “community standards” at Youtube or Facebook? It seems to be an entirely arbitrary designation, according to the whim of the individuals they hire scroll through complaints. In both cases (youtube and facebook) there may also be some directive on high against so-called “hate speech” and “Islamophobia.” No free speech on the internet anymore, as long as these media giants kowtow to political correctness. Meanwhile BLM, Antifa, and jihadis can propagandize as much as they want, and they are aided by “PC compassionate” types (as identified by psychologist Jordan Peterson). The PC compassionates (virtue signalers) come to the aid of the PC authoritarians every time. A lot of this is happening at the unconscious level, as psychological projection of demonic qualities the Right, meanwhile ignoring the totalitarian tendencies they themselves have fallen sway to.
Lydia says
See? It’s all a bureaucracy, they can hide behind smoke and mirrors. It’s all ‘privatized’ companies that you are dealing with, yet so much about them is relied on. They can make all the rules and who can complain? Even if you sue them, eventually these courts will all be sharia tribunals. It is that Kafka nightmare. And they are singling us out for being a voice of truth. I will stand against it no matter what comes along. That is all I can do. Refuse to comply. And that is enough in the eyes of God.
Brian Hoff says
The Daily Stromer is still have no wedsite host. There is than dark part of the internet where they are but you must enter in the complere internet address by name an it isnot than register internet address. The internet is under international control by the UN which grant than group the right to register domain name and address to wedsite. All hosting sites must forward all application for than wedsite to then for approval.
Brian Hoff says
It than wed hosting site refuse to play then can have domain and addresd remore also.
gravenimage says
What is “Brian Hoff”–really, “DefenderofIslam”–babbling about?
Flavius Claudius Iulianus says
http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2017/07/28/report-steve-bannon-wants-google-facebook-to-be-regulated-like-utilities/
gravenimage says
YouTube removes “Robert Spencer” playlist as “inappropriate”
…………………
More alarming crushing of freedom of speech.
Peacemaker says
Interesting ! YouTube removed the bookmark of movie clips that come from JihadWatch but leave the hateful, racist genuine JihadWatch at large.
John Donne: “No man is an iland, intire of it selfe; every man is a peece of the Continent, a part of the maine; if a clod bee washed away by the Sea, Europe is the lesse, as well as if a Promontorie were, as well as if a Mannor of thy friends or of thine owne were; any mans death diminishes me, because I am involved in Mankinde; And therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; It tolls for thee….”
Becca says
Hope you read these comments Mr. Spencer.
Just wanted you to know that the last several videos on your Jihad Watch channel have had your voice deleted. However, the opening/closing music and background videos can still be heard.
Thank you for all your efforts and God Bless You!
marc says
try using another browser, the sound is fine
Becca says
Thank you for your advice. Although I am using the YouTube app on an iPad and the problem only involves Jihad Watch videos, I will try my browser to see if that helps.