When Motion M-103 condemning “Islamophobia” was first being discussed, its proponents allayed fears about infringement upon the freedom of speech by saying that it was just a condemnation, and did not have criminal penalties attached. But now those penalties are being bruited about, just as the foes of M-103 warned they would be.
The M-103 backers are simply trying to criminalize a segment of opinion. In arguing that there should be censorship of talk radio in Canada, they offered this as justification: “Radio poubelle (trash radio) stations often air segments voicing concerns about Muslim immigration and the threat of Islamic terrorism.”
Canadians are going to have to decide whether they still value the freedom of speech as an indispensable prerequisite of a free society, or whether they’re going to adopt Sharia blasphemy restrictions under the guise of “diversity.” And other Western nations are soon going to face the same choice as well.
“M-103 talk turns to prosecution, censorship,” by Anthony Furey, Postmedia Network, September 20, 2017:
After the first M-103 hearing on Monday, I wrote that we were perhaps facing a less adversarial process than expected. Liberal MP Iqra Khalid was conciliatory as the initial witness, emphasizing that her motion to tackle discrimination was equally about all religions and races. She hardly mentioned the ill-defined phrase Islamophobia.
How quickly things change. Wednesday’s hearing confirmed some of Canadians’ worst suspicions about the process and its effects on free speech.
Witness Michel Juneau-Katsuya was an officer in both the RCMP and CSIS. He’s been in private security for a number of years and a regular media voice offering commentary on national security and terror.
From what I know of him, he’s never said anything particularly controversial. Yet on Wednesday, he offered a number of eerie observations about using the state to deal with voices that “go too far.”
Juneau-Katsuya used his time to speak – in French, so all of my quotes are the interpreter’s words – about the threat of the “alt-right” in Quebec, never specifying how he was using this term.
This in itself is no big deal and Quebec certainly seems to have a problem with radicalism. But then he went on to chastise what they call “trash radio” in Quebec, recommending they should perhaps have their licences pulled for engaging in Islamophobia.
What exactly are they saying on Francophone radio? Are they calling for violence? Issuing death threats?
In the aftermath of the Quebec City mosque shootings, there were similar calls to deal with these stations. A CBC story featured much hand-wringing over the stations, but could only offer this evidence: “Radio poubelle (trash radio) stations often air segments voicing concerns about Muslim immigration and the threat of Islamic terrorism.”
Is that it? Maybe they’re rude and excessive. But how is that a crime that warrants the government shutting them down?
Juneau-Katsuya then lamented that there was “too much shyness and political correctness when it comes to the prosecuting process, letting it go under the blanket of free speech and letting things go too far.” We should be prosecuting people more, he said.
He was then asked by Liberal MP Arif Virani if Rebel Media “amplifies the voices of the extreme right?” He answered yes.
Virani then read out a tweet that wrongly said the Quebec City shooter had an unspecified Muslim accomplice.
Juneau-Katsuya said it should be “denounced and if possible prosecuted, because here, this is defamation.”
The tweet, Virani then revealed, was in fact made by my colleague Tarek Fatah – who was also testifying that day.
What should we make of all this? No one disputes people should be charged for threats, harassment and, of course, assault. That wasn’t what was being discussed though.
No, this was a former federal police officer basically toying with the censoring of the media and the prosecuting of individuals when “things go too far.”…
My colleagues in the media tried to say M-103 was a toothless motion. Yet here we are, having a committee hearing. Then they said it would never lead to suppression of speech. Yet look what just happened.
This is a dangerous game we’re playing. Everyone’s free to disagree with Quebec talk radio, Ezra Levant and Tarek Fatah until the cows come home. But prosecution?!…
Anti-jihad says
Islamic blasphemy laws in Canada…who’d “a thunk it? As we hurtle towards the new Canada, or should I say the “Islamic Republic of Canada”, I’m looking for a country to immigrate to…one that won’t fall for anything like Canada did.
Rob Porter says
Anti-jihad, you are not alone when considering emigrating from this now utter brain-dead country. It knows little about or cares about the free speech – that for decades has been low on the list of things considered important, all part of making Canada a shabby excuse for a democracy. Read this article by Anthony Furey and you more fully appreciate how dimwitted and dishonest are the cramp-brained imbeciles who run this country. So dishonest and cowardly are they, that they cannot bring themselves to see and acknowledge that it is Muslim pushing for sharia and promoting violence who are the real threat in Canada. Instead these half-wits falsely, because they are politically correct and liars consider the promoters of freedom and free speech the enemy. What a bad joke Canada is rapidly becoming.
In a letter to Justin Trudeau, this is how I ended: “If it is your goal to turn Canada into a sharia-compliant Islamic country I will appreciate you doing me the courtesy to so inform me, so that I can remove myself and my children to a democratic society in which free speech and values of Western civilization are respected.” I seriously doubt that I will receive an intelligent response.
Kathy says
Someone voted that little idiot Trudeau into office. Canadians should probably take hold of their country instead of running away like losers.
gravenimage says
Guys, Canada needs her patriots now more than ever.
MFritz says
If Canada continues along this path it will end like Sweden.
Anti-jihad says
I guess if we can’t get out before Canada becomes the “Islamic Republic of Canada”, we can always do what the Muslims do…don’t integrate, lie to save your skin, don’t pledge your allegiance to the country you’re in,…
mortimer says
Lawyers will argue before the Supreme Court that any extra protection for the ideology of Islam is not merited and a breech of the freedom of speech provision in the Constitution.
Canada Criminal Code 319 (1) Every one who, by communicating statements in any public place, incites hatred against any identifiable group where such incitement is likely to lead to a breach of the peace is guilty of
o (a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or
o (b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.
Rob Porter says
Mortimer, regarding what you have cited in the Canada Criminal Code 319, please explain to us why, if this law is being applied, imams spouting hatred of Jews and infidels in Toronto and other mosques are not arrested and charged? Tarek Fatah fairly recently testifying before a Senate committee in Ottawa stated the every Friday in all of Canada’s mosques, imams pray for the defeat of infidels by Muslims. How does this not constitute incitement to violence and hate speech, and how does it continue unabated? It continues because the various Canadian authorities are so subverted by Muslims in their ranks and the non-Muslims are so gutless, devoid of any convictions on this matter and afflicted with the disease that is political correctness, that they say and do nothing to stop the rot.
As to the Supreme Court of Canada, this is now such a foolish and cowardly court that my expectation of wise decisions from it are zero.
Voytek Gagalka says
Even if they succeed to “make law” to criminalize “islamophobia,” on the long range this attempt will FAIL! Canada still has the Supreme Court which will make that “law” unconstitutional, sooner rather than later. (It happened already few times before with other ill advised motions.) That is nothing else but “lawyers’ game.” They love to have “cases to work on.” Don’t lose your spirits!
Terry Gain says
Claims that M103 won’t suppress free speech are nonsensical lies. The whole point of M-103 is to suppress speech critical of Islam.
Grace says
Don’t count on the Supreme Court of Canada!!! They are extremely leftist!
mortimer says
Agree with Voytek. Many teachers of law in the universities are working at this moment on defeating M103.
Cretius says
The only phobia is that oif Muslims who cannot accept the discussion or criiticism of the histortory, their prophet and belkief system. Ideas hgave no rights. People in secular societies diiscussz and debate ideas. Islaasm is fair discussion. Censorship is anti-democratic. Isllamophobia is a frausd and as such must be rejected.
blitz2b says
“…My colleagues in the media tried to say M-103 was a toothless motion…”
Indeed that’s how Islam works, these ignorant leftist morons know nothing about how Islam operates.
Motion M-10 at inception was truly like a toothless infant…. Well surprise surprise! Guess whats starting to cut teeth now?…
Heaven help us when we have to contend with a whole foul mouthful of Sharia chompers…
When Islam digs it’s roots into any civilization, a root canal type procedure of those insidious teeth would be the only solution to rid that civilization from a complete rot.
brane pilot says
Once a political process is set in motion, even with the best of intentions, it will not stop until an opposing force stops it. History provides lessons, and that is one of them.
If a political process in motion gains sufficient momentum to crush opposition, it will continue unopposed until it defines a new reality on its terms. Any unopposed political process will always lead ultimately to a Totalitarian state. Look at Europe. Look at Canada. Look at the USA. The process in motion is identical. The ultimate destination of the Process is the same.
The Civil Rights movement in the US in the 1960s, based upon the best of intentions, continued relentlessly evolving into an ‘affirmative action’ and open-borders immigration movement intended to marginalize and ultimately replace the ethnic European population of the USA. Now they are tearing down historical monuments associated with white people, even the founders of the country. The process will not stop there, but will continue into escalating and increasingly violent absurdity dedicated to crushing all vestiges of ‘racist and bigoted’ ethnic European ‘hate’. The end game will be collapse into widespread civil unrest and even civil war. Ethnic European useful idiots will be the Vanguard. The useful idiots always lead the way, believing they will be spared in the end game.
Canada is now on the same path, becoming a Totalitarian state where any criticism or discussion of unpleasant truths regarding Islam or other state-protected ideologies will be treated as ‘hate speech’ and a criminal act. Such ‘hate speech’ was previously called a ‘thought crime’ in Soviet Russia and similar totalitarian states. Those found guilty were sent to gulags or insane asylums. It remains to be seen what Canada will do with its new, invented criminals.
Political Progressivism is undeniably the new road to Fascism. Soon, if you refer to anyone as other than ‘Comrad’ you will have committed a gender-bias hate crime. If you refer to Islam and mass Islamic immigration as anything other than an unmitigated good, you will have committed a religious-bias/racist hate crime. It really will get that absurd. It really will.
The craziness is upon us and seems unstoppable at this point, D Trump notwithstanding. How we got here is irrelevant at this point. We got here because we are human beings and that is how we work. From here, the issue increasingly becomes one of survival in the new political environment.
Peter says
Boycott Canada, eh?
Pablo says
So Christine Douglas Williams and others were spot on regarding the intention of M-103 from the get go.
Japetto Donatelli says
After years of lies and obtuse behavior by the leftist appeasers I’ve come to realize they are really just gangsters for islam. They’re a bunch of tough talking loudmouths threatening good people who simply voice opinions about a very important issue that affects us all. They can f*ck off with all their vague and open ended threats, they can kiss my defiant islamophobic butt. We aren’t the ones ratcheting things up with our concerns and anger, it’s the vast array of threats and violence muslims bring to our nations that’s to blame. These gangsters in government that threaten us with laws and “studies” and jail aren’t working for the people any more, they’re working for their own sick agenda. They’re “brownshirts” working for islam. They have lost their moral vantage when they resort to high-handed, imperious threats against our right to conscionable thinking and expression. Hitler’s cronies were in power once too, they passed laws that the whole world knows were hateful and bigoted to a mass-murdering level. And these leftist cronies who try and silence the moral conscience of good people are no better, they are encouraging the destruction of our freedoms and peace for islam’s Nazish creed. Thousands are murdered for this ugly creed every year, and millions are suffering multi tiered slavery for its hateful ignorance. Don’t you stick your ugly c*nt face in mine and act tough against my right to speak against it. These bully politicians need the full weight of society’s condemnation on their shoulders so they will be driven right out of power. Then we’ll get new leaders who aren’t afraid to deal with the truth of islam’s 1400 year history of murder and conquest for demon allah.
We need new laws to fight the criminal misdeeds of these politicians who work so hard to aid islam and facilitate terror. They are no better than Hitler’s propagandists who hid the truth and helped precipitate the murder of millions. I’ve never been so sure of anything in my life.
endislam says
Is it ok to share your comment on Trudeaus f..kbook page?
Japetto Donatelli says
I’m not sure I get you, are you asking to use my post? or were you talking satirically? Anyway, anyone can reprint my post, I bequeath it to the public domain.
the dutch patriot says
I once looked up to Canadians. Canadians!? That great liberators of the Netherlands. Not no more. A country that votes in a obvious psychopath and traitor like Trudeau is sick. Very sick.
Jen says
He won’t get a second term…not after the Omar Khadr debacle. Canadians are disgusted with Trudeau. That won’t be forgotten.
Skeptic Sam says
But he is so charismatic, good looking, and loves muzzlams.
Terry Gain says
Claims that M103 won’t suppress free speech are nonsensical lies. The whole point of M-103 is to suppress speech critical of Islam.
Jen says
“The whole point of M-103 is to suppress speech critical of Islam.” Exactly right. It was the usual slimy leftist and muslimist tactic—gently maneuvering society toward their desired outcome–greater and greater control over our freedoms. Then sharia law, then submission to islam, then a shit-hole existence as per all other islamic countries. “You don’t know what you’ve got til it’s gone” That’s M-103. I think I’ll get a t-shirt.
Never forget says
Even if they push this through, they cannot make people associate with those they fear. My family lived in nazi occupied Europe and avoided the nazis where possible due to fear. I guess Canada is governed by nazis. Ironically due to the muzzling caused by this motion and any subsequent law I am becoming more prejudiced against those not of my own demographic. I would never consider insulting strangers to their face, assaulting them if they are peaceful, torching or vandalising. I used to even have some basic mundane conversations with Muslim cashiers just like any other cashiers. However I will not do so in the future for my safety in case the state decides to send me to Siberia. When I was growing up only Russians did this sort of thing. I guess this motion and subsequent laws mean that I cannot treat them equally. The same with the black lives matter movement. Due to the violent demonstrations I am now scared to deal with Black people, whereas before I used to talk to a large variety of people. I guess I will only talk to old white people. OK, Canada, if that is what you want. I better avoid students too because the alt left and the alt right are fighting each other as they fire bomb the universities that my foolish tax dollars paid for. OK, no more income tax payments.
Japetto Donatelli says
I would never consider insulting strangers to their face, assaulting them if they are peaceful, torching or vandalising. I used to even have some basic mundane conversations with Muslim cashiers… However I will not do so in the future for my safety…
You touched on an important point, that’s an understandable response by you. You are, like most of us, a good person. You don’t have an innate hatred for anyone. But when you are forced to sacrifice your own basic rights to satisfy the bigoted intolerance of others then it starts to seem like a grave injustice and threat. And then add insult to injury, when your own government turns on you and aids that demographic in their quest then it starts to seem like government oppression of the worst kind. And that’s where we’re at with this thing. We’re paying billions of dollars to help muslims destroy everything we hold dear, our neighborhoods, our safety, our laws and cultural identity. And if we dare speak out about these rather unjust and painful changes then we’re hateful bigots that can’t stand diversity, as if muslims have ever been for diversity! Every lying leftists defending islam may be fooling themselves but not us who value reason and morality over religious barbarity and tyranny. I don’t care how nice Trudeau’s suits are or how big his phony smile. He’ll always be a coward and a traitor to me, someone who doesn’t have the good moral sense to do the right thing.
Ethel Red says
It has started in my city already. We are in our 70,s and my wife uses a cane for mobility and she was on her own in a local store and when going down an aisle came upon a full Burka clad women pushing a pram with a baby in it. Beside her was her husband (I suppose ) and there was no room for my wife to pass and he would not move to allow her to go through. She stood her ground and even the woman knew what was going and eventually this Islamic coward let her pass. What this fool has done has caused me now to look on the whole bunch of them in a completely different light. A couple of days later while going into our local grocery store another Burka clad women and her husband were ahead of us and the women held the door for us and I would not allow her to have this false satisfaction of portraying them as being enclusive by accepting this courtesy. They have started this now, what is going to happen is exactly what is happening in the rest of the world. This Islamic coward who doesn’t respect our values, which of course includes women is protected by Jihadi Trudeau who now says Islamaphobia is anti-feminist. What an ignorant man and a fool this supposed P.M is.
Never forget says
A local Canadian newspaper is reporting on complaints at a library of offensive material people are watching online. They say it is easier to ask patrons not to look at porn on public library computers, but more difficult if patrons find other stuff offensive, from religion, to movies, etc. What next, recipes for ham and pork, adding wine sauce to tenderise meat? What about any fashion issues? What about vet advice re your dog? The list could and will go on? If these latter issues are banned then shut down all Canadian libraries and save the taxpayer money. People can buy their own books and computers from the underground as they do in other fascist countries like North Korea, the middle east and communist Russia. Youtube videos about the decline of Sweden could be banned at your local library as could this website. Probably anything positive about Israel, Christianity, plus any other infidel religion will be blocked, banned or fined. Your local librarian will act as Gestapo.
gravenimage says
Muslims are instructed to push Infidels into the gutter–this is in the Pact of Umah, which lays out the strictures of dhimmitude.
Irene Brekelmans says
For years and years on, it was almost impossible for Europeans to immigrate to the USA, you first had to write your application forms, etc. Then you had to wait for 5 yearsfor your answer to be accepted, I don’t
know if it still like that, but to my last knowledge it is.
The USA only made a kind of bonusses per year, European countries got each a different amount of people who could move to the US, without having to wait for 5 years. Like the Netherlands were aloud to send 500 people per year, the UK 800, France 1000, etc I don’t know how much every country.
And there were always many people who wanted to go and waited already for years and I still don’t think coming from a European country, that I can say just like that: America, here I am.
Let alone,: I brought my own religion, I am going to conquer you, you have to keep now to my laws, or otherwise I am going to kill or rape you, or behead you, or stone you, you eat the kind of food I tell you to and when, etc. etc. I could not even immigrate to the USA, yes may be in 5 years.
That is why I do not understand that you let millions of Arabs running over your land, command you, take over, let your children sniff all the carpets. I can go on and on, but than I get so sarcastic and I am tired of all those spineless people and the leftist dictators and muslims, but I will never give away my free speech on anything and will keep on going.
I can still see that welcomes sign of yesterday : They ar not dangerous, they are in danger, welcome !
We should have been there with our sig: They are dangerous, we are in danger, goodbye and get out
And when we were so lucky to be able to immigrate to the US, we needed a sponsor who had to sign for you, so you wouldn’t fall for any money food, housing , etc on the American taxpayers. Your laws were very firm for al those years. We might not have liked it and a lot of people could not go, because they did not know anybody in the USA and did not have any family there who could sponsor them.
hen people go the the USA to visit family, they first need an Esta form, they have to give fingerprints
and your eyes scanned, even before you leave to the USA, in the airport where you fly from, you get one of those security guys, who are asking where you go, why you go, which adress etc. When you arrive at customs in the USA and you have done the fingerprints etc, and you want to stay 14 days in the US, they give you a month’s time, and after that month you have to leave.
But we always understood that the USA could not take all the people in just for the American dream.
I do not understand European countries, but in compare with you they are small countries, but as spineless, but you as the USA, I still don’t get it, and whoever is behind all this, did a very “good” job of it, it divided the Europeans and the American people.
We never wanted war, but to many people came over and swarmed the countries and if we would have stood united and just told them, that they have to keep by the laws of the land and if they could not do it, then they had to go back to their own country.
Years ago, in the US in some states, if you were a foreigner with a green card and you did 3 crimes, you were expelled out of the country I heard.
What will become of the Western countries? But, it is not over yet, keep saying within yourself, every time you think about it. This all has to stop, the muslims and leftists will not win. No Sharia here!!!
Greyhound Fancier says
You are quite correct about sponsorship. In 1926, my grandmother emigrated to the US from Germany. She had a sponsor who paid her passage. She worked as a milkmaid, then as a cook, on a farm. When she’d paid off her passage, she left the farm and moved closer to her brothers in the city.
Neither she or her five brothers, who also emigrated, ever received, or expected to receive, a dime in support from US taxpayers.
Why do we take in dependent people who can’t support themselves? Why take in people who don’t respect us and who want to make our country into a copy of the mohammedan mess they left behind?
Flavius Claudius Iulianus says
If you think it’s absurd for this to actually be turned into law then consider that the present Minister of Status of Women in Canada is Maryam Monsef. Monsef is a practicing Mohammadin. She is an immigrant who came to Canada in the late 90s. (She was born either in Afghanistan or Iran – no one knows for sure because her mother lied about it on the immigration papers)
To my eyes this is as absurd as having the Saudi’s on the UN’s Women’s Council.
gravenimage says
Yes–just grotesque.
Lydia says
One thing leads to another.
All I can say is stand up to them no matter what the consequences are.
I would rather suffer and die with dignity for doing and saying what is true and righteous…
than live safely as a coward of low character and morals and without dignity.
Carolyne says
“Is life so dear and peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it Almighty God. I know not what course others may take, but as for me, give me liberty or give me death.”
—-Patrick Henry
IMO this holds true for many of us today.
Carolyne says
Patrick Henry also said that, “It is natural for man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes to a painful truth, and listen to the song of the siren til she transform us into beasts…..”
We have a very similar situation now,. Will Islam conquer us, enslave us and turn us into beasts as they are? Are we less brave than our forefathers?
Flavius Claudius Iulianus says
http://www.generationidentity.ca
Barry Donnelly says
Islam : The Doctrine of Demons ; an ideology drafted in Hell for low life barbarian scum who love raping little girls and torturing infidels . To helll with them and the trudeau dictatorship . P.S. From your favorite Canadian Infidel !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Ethel Red says
The Liberals say there new Arms Treaty they are trying to pass will not affect any private gun ownership in Canada. We Conservatives do not trust them, all they have to do is include this fact in the bill and let it pass. They say we have nothing to fear, we don’t believe them. Look to Venezuela and what can happen when the Govt. seizes personal firearms.
Carolyne says
One need only look to England to see what can happen when the Govt,. seizes personal firearms.
Kasey says
The P C Establishment seem to have real difficulty in distinguishing between Islamophobia, which hardly exists anywhere, and Islamoreality which does exist in all its deceptive, discriminatory, intolerant and lethally violent forms around the World, to the detriment of all non-Muslims.
Peacemaker says
All motion being raised in parliament must have some sort of impact on civilians. Otherwise, those who raised the motion are wasting taxpayer money by doing nonsense.
Those who said Motion was a toothless motion just simply implied that Iqra Khalid, a Liberal MP in Canadian Parliament was wasting taxpayer money. So, why should you keep a wasting taxpayer money Iqra Khalid in Canadian Parliament ?
mortimer says
The M103 apologists are rebadging criticism of theocratic totalitarianism as ‘racism’. This might be fair if the only Muslims were Arabs, since the Koran and hadiths refer to the Arabs as the ‘best of people’ in different ways. Only the clan of Mohammed is racially first class and fit to rule.
On the other side, there were at least THREE famous racial totalitarianisms in the 20th century of not: Nazism, Italian fascism and Bushido-Shintoism-Emperor Worship. Greece, Bulgaria, China, India all have had their share of master race theories.
Is M103 going to apply to NOT criticizing the Japanese version, Chinese version, Hindu version, etc. of the MASTER RACE theory? No valid reason has be given for NOT criticizing the Mohammedan MASTER RELIGION THEORY.
John Forbes says
Well I guess no CANADIAN should be in the least bit suprised that this is heading towards real BLASPHEMY LAWS & EXCLUSIVE PROTECTION for ISLAM !
The real issue now is the POPULATION READY to tolerate this from JUSTIM ???
Ethel Red says
I surely hope that all my fellow Canadians can see the complete failure of Jihadist Trudeau and vote him out in the next federal election. We are lost if a complete majority doesn’t rid our country of this mentally unbalanced fool. We need a govt. that stands for our Canadian values. How anyone in their right mind can say, and try to impose on us sanctions that say, You will be prosecuted if you say the teachings in the Islamic Quoran, Kill Jews, Kill Homosexualls, Kill Non-believers, Kill Apostates, Honour Killings are proper, Women have half the value of women and Sharia must be the law of Canada. This foolish women who brought up M-103 to Parliament has publically said she desires Sharia. What do we want for our children and grandchildren a fool in Ottawa, who has been blinded by his Islamic buddies and wants to change our way of life. I am in my 70,s, my father fought the Nazis with the R.A.F in Europe, my great uncles name is on the cenotaph in Campbeltown Sctland, killed in the first war. I wonder how many names will be on memorials when we might have to do the next fight in our own country. I hope it doesn’t come to this but when I see what is happening in other parts of the world I have great fears. Loyal Canadians will never stand for this.
gravenimage says
She isn’t foolish–she is a devout Mohammedan. She wants freedom of speech shut down.
paul says
In Canada, the victim would be an islamophobe, in need of jail under M-103. Look what he made them do! While in jail, if the police offended him, he could receive 10.5 million dollars, and an apology from Muslim PM Trudeau.
Note:
A family of 14 gets $700 per head each, and thats more than 10,000 per month. The kids drive new SUV’s to school, while your kids walk. A Canadian senior retired, may receive $585 per month on CPP.
We need and want them, folks!
Next time, DO NOT VOTE LIBERAL!
Will says
It’s quite obvious that this most merciful , this most benevolent, this most gracious of politico-religious tradition simply cannot ‘earn’ our absolute respect on its own merits , therefore it demands state enforced veneration , the state endorsed totalitarian submission to a creed is the norm in most Islamic states where sharia’s blasphemy tenets forbids, with a vengeance, any criticism of the state ideology. You criticize the state-ideology at your peril , the wrath, indignation and punishment will be swift. Self-reflective critical thought , introspection of ones religious beliefs has no legacy in theocratic states .
It’s surreal that the truncheons of blasphemy would dictate conversations in 21st century Canada ~!?!
Will this become an other price of Islamization in western culture .
M-103 , state enforced speech code, is poised to replace our fundamental rights to free speech , introducing state censorship and state persecution for speaking outside state condoned speech on behalf of an intolerant ideology .
Del says
Banning free speech is now officially at the Government level where Grande Prairie City Manager Robert Nicolay cancelled a legal protest against M-103.He used the pathetic cowardly excuse that there might be a violent response. This official Government ruling clearly violated Sections of the Canadian bill of Rights.
http://www.dailyheraldtribune.com/2017/08/27/city-denies-permit-for-anti-m103-rally
There was no response from the Provincial or Federal authorities. It seems they support banning free speech.
Did Nicolay have knowledge of violence from the alt-left?
Is he a member of antifa or does he support the violent left?
Is he a closet Muslim jihadist?
Did he vote Liberal?
Did he have the approval of City Council to ban free speech?
Why does he hate democracy?
Why have there been no charges laid by the police or the Human Rights lawyers?
Why is he not being sued?
It seems that personal opinions have to be pre-approved by Governments in Alberta. At a minimum he should be fired.
Politicianaphobia says
We need an Infidel– I-103 motion in Canada. I want Imam Mazim Abdul-Adhim, of London, Ontario, leader of Hibtz ut Tahrir, calling for Shari’ah law in Canada, Imam Sayed al-Ghitini of the Al-Andalous Islamic Centre in Montreal, who said “Destroy the accursed Jews and kill them one by one and give victory to our brothers who engage in jihad for your sake everywhere”. Same mosque, Imam Wael-al-Ghitawi who said “Jerusalim is Arab and Islamic and Jews are decendants of Mongols”. Imam Abdu Albasset Egwilla of Ottawa, who said ” Martyrdom in the name of Allah”. The Muslims in Calgary who condone FGM, I want all of these people arrested. For God’s sake where the hell are our politicians. Canadian law supersedes Shari’ah law and it is damn well time somebody in Canada stood up and did something to protect Canadians. If a Muslim believes in Shari’ah law, and Islamic scholars will tell you any true Muslim does, then they will not uphold Canadian law and should not be a member of parliament. To the Liberals, NDP and Conservatives I say ” Stop the political games and do something or get the hell out of parliament. You were elected to protect Canadians”.
UNCLE VLADDI says
Well of course Canada’s LIBERALS are doing this! All libertine “liberal” criminals are “muslims,” and all “muslim” criminals are “liberals!”
Libertines are criminals who are ALWAYS against any and all responsibilities, “Because you all do it, too! Whee!”
i.e:
“I don’t care about what you want or say because it’s ALWAYS my right to do whatever I want whenever I want to, wherever I want and to whomever I want to do it to, and you have no right to stop me, but only the responsibility to be my slave and do whatever I want you to, so there, NYAH!
And it is my right to always attack everyone else first, because you always did and so also will always attack me first, so nobody is ever innocent and since everyone’s equally guilty, nobody is ever really guilty, either!
Besides, since we can never really know anythig at all for sure, there are no “first” or “second,” causes or effects, either! Whee!”
Since you will always break agreements if and when you can, so will I! Except I’m more honest than you, in that I am openly declaring my dishonesty! Lying is allowed since it can and so always will happen anyway, and so all the treaties which can be broken, should always be broken, if and when one can get away with it! Might makes right!
Therefore while all is (by God, obviously, since nothing is outside god’s power and will) allowed unless and until very specifically disallowed in advance, it is also true that even everything which has been specifically denied in advance, can and so should also be permitted later if one can achieve is by breaking one’s word, if and when one has the power to do so! Whee!
There – I think I’ve covered everything that can happen when criminals refuse to obey rules, so since there are no real crimes or criminals, my predictions apply to everyone all the time, for all time, to all humanity, too!
Whee!
– Muhammad –
Pretending that the global crime-gang called islam is a “race” of poor swarthy animal-people, oppressed by the mentally superior whites, in order to slander everyone who notices it’s a crime-gang as a hatefully bigoted “racist” – is to deliberately enable that crime-gang’s crimes by hiding and destroying the evidence of same, and thus to be a willing accessory to those crimes. Since islam is a murder-gang, and the penalty for committing and enabling the commission of murder is DEATH, anyone and everyone who calls an opponent of muslims, islam, and their global jihad, a “racist!” should be lawfully put to death.
Everyone who defends islam and muslims endorses crime.
Endorsing crime IS a crime, so those doing it are criminals.
Right in the Qur’an is: the obligation to murder Jews and Christians (Surah 9:29), to terrorize all non-Muslims (8:12), to rape young girls (65:4), to enslave people for sex (4:3), to lie about one’s true goals (3:54), and the command to make war on all the infidels (9:123) and subjugate the entire world to Allah (9:33).
Are death-threats legal? NO.
Is extortion legal? NO.
Is slavery legal? NO.
Is murder legal? NO.
Is rape legal? NO.
THEN ISLAM IS ILLEGAL!
Rape, slavery, robbery, extortion and murder are never OK!
Everything muslims pretend to see as “holy” is already a crime!
So nobody has a legal right to practice islam anywhere on earth!
IN TRYING TO MAKE CRITICISM OF THE GLOBAL CRIME GANG CALLED “ISLAM” INTO A CRIME, TO PROTECT THAT CRIME GANG BY HIDING THE EVIDENCE OF ITS CRIMES, JUSTIN TURDEAU IS A CRIMINAL AND A TRAITOR TO RATIONALITY, CIVILIZATION, AND HUMANITY ITSELF.
UNCLE VLADDI says
Fred Bastiat noted something like
“We all have the natural right to self-defense; bad laws are those which try to deprive us of that right.”