In Muslim countries, one must conform one’s behavior to suit Muslim sensibilities. And in non-Muslim countries, one must conform one’s behavior to suit Muslim sensibilities.
“Authorities say they are considering the attack to be religiously motivated but have so far been unable to identify the woman involved…”
No kidding, really? The crack Merkelian police force couldn’t see through her niqab? Of course, banning face veils in public for security reasons would be “Islamophobic,” wouldn’t it?
“Veiled Woman Assaults Shopkeeper for Selling Lingerie Near Headscarves,” by Chris Tomlinson, Breitbart, September 7, 2017:
A saleswoman in a fashion boutique in Berlin was viciously assaulted by a niqab-wearing woman who objected to lingerie being displayed in the same window as Islamic headscarves.
The incident occurred in the Berlin district of Neukölln, known for its high percentage of migrant residents. The niqab-wearing woman raised her objections, but after her demands to remove the lingerie were denied, she attacked the shopkeeper, Die Welt reports.
The victim, a 40-year-old woman from an Arabic immigrant background, said she saw a tattoo on the neck of her attacker and blonde hair under the niqab. Police say the woman had entered the shop once before and insulted the saleswoman in both German and Turkish before being told to leave.
Authorities say they are considering the attack to be religiously motivated but have so far been unable to identify the woman involved as she fled the scene before police were able to arrive. Police added that the assailant left her mobile phone and a glove at the scene.
The incident is not the first time a member of the Muslim community in Germany has tried to enforce morality on business owners or residents in Berlin. According to a report from July, Muslims of Chechen origin have repeatedly tried to enforce Islamic morality in the city….
Jim Conch says
No problem mon, you got the cell phone. That should be easy to track.
Saleem Smith says
It is a dangerous lifestyle for a Muslim women to walk down the street WITHOUT wearing a veil in a strictly Islamic, Muslim majority country. Especially one ruled by Islamic, Sharia law. We ex-Muslims living with Islam’s formal and informal death penalty for apostasy know that Mohammedanism is a misogynistic fraud.
Under Islamic law as applied in the United Arab Emirates, premarital sex is punishable by 100 lashes. Stoning is a legal form of judicial punishment in UAE. In 2006, an expatriate was sentenced to death by stoning for committing adultery. Between 2009 and 2013, several people were sentenced to death by stoning. In May 2014, an Asian housemaid was sentenced to death by stoning in Abu Dhabi. Islamic law dictates the personal status law, which regulate matters such as marriage, divorce and child custody. The Sharia-based personal status law is applied to Muslims and sometimes non-Muslims. Non-Muslim expatriates are liable to Sharia rulings on marriage, divorce and child custody. Sharia courts have exclusive jurisdiction to hear family disputes, including matters involving divorce, inheritances, child custody, child abuse and guardianship of minors. Sharia courts may also hear appeals of certain criminal cases including rape, robbery, and related crimes. Apostasy is a crime punishable by death in the UAE. UAE incorporates hudud crimes of Sharia into its Penal Code – apostasy being one of them. Article 1 and Article 66 of UAE’s Penal Code requires hudud crimes to be punished with the death penalty, therefore apostasy is punishable by death in the UAE. Emirati women must receive permission from male guardian to remarry. The requirement is derived from Sharia, and has been federal law since 2005.In all emirates, it is illegal for Muslim women to marry non-Muslims. In the UAE, a marriage union between a Muslim woman and non-Muslim man is punishable by law, since it is considered a form of “fornication”.
http://www.faithfreedom.org/
>>>>>>>>>>
Islamic Misogyny >>>
Muslims love to claim that Islam has granted women equal rights. Sadly, this is not true. The Qur’an states several times that women are to be granted less rights then those enjoyed by men.
This article will examine the status of women and their rights according to Islam, as well as some of the many disgusting things that Muhammad said regarding women.
The inherent oppression and degradation of women in Islam is abhorrent. For every good thing Muhammad’s Islam says about women, one can easily find a passage referring to women in the most unkindly of lights. Such is the reality of the fundamentally contradictory religion of Islam. One minute Islam is the perfect religion of peace and justice – the next it commands Muslims to maim, murder and subjugate others. Muslim women should learn the truth about Islam, and fast, if they truly care about their daughters and the future of women in general.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In controversial verse 4:34 of the Qur’an, men are told to beat their disobedient wives after first warning them and then sending them to sleep in separate beds. This horrendous verse approves of and even sanctions, domestic abuse. As we shall see momentarily, Islamic theology also permits slavery and rape. No person of sound mind and good heart could believe that this is the wish of god. Islam is nothing more than the cult of a long dead, selfish little mad man named Muhammad ibn Abdullah.
Qur’an, 4:34
Men have authority over women because God has made the one superior to the other, and because they spend their wealth to maintain them. Good women are obedient. They guard their unseen parts because God has guarded them. As for those from whom you fear disobedience, admonish them and send them to beds apart and beat them. Then if they obey you, take no further action against them. Surely God is high, supreme.
Here is an examination of how other translators render this controversial passage:
Pickthall: “and scourge them”
Yusuf Ali: “(And last) beat them (lightly)”
Al-Hilali/Khan: “(and last) beat them (lightly, if it is useful)”
Shakir: “and beat them”
Sher Ali: “and chastise them”
Khalifa: “then you may (as a last alternative) beat them”
Arberry: “and beat them”
Rodwell: “and scourge them”
Sale: “and chastise them”
Asad: “then beat them”
Hadith, Sunan Abu-Dawud, Book 11, Number 2142:
Narrated Umar ibn al-Khattab:
The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: A man will not be asked as to why he beat his wife.
The Qur’an compares women to a field (tilth) that a man is free to use when, and as he chooses:
002.223 Your wives are as a tilth unto you; so approach your tilth when or how ye will; but do some good act for your souls beforehand; and fear Allah. And know that ye are to meet Him (in the Hereafter), and give (these) good tidings to those who believe. .
According to Muhammad and his Islam, a woman’s testimony is worth half that of a man’s:
Qur’an 002:282 “Get two witnesses, out of your own men, and if there are not two men, then a man and two women, such as ye choose, for witnesses, so that if one of them errs, the other can remind her”
The Qur’an permits men to marry up to four wives, and have sex with slave girls if they want to do so:
004:003 “If ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly with the orphans, marry women of your choice, two or three or four; but if ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly (with them), then only one, or (a captive) that your right hands possess, that will be more suitable, to prevent you from doing injustice”
Hadith, Sahih Bukhari, Vol. 1, Book 6, No. 301:
Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri:
Once Allah’s Apostle went out to the Musalla (to offer the prayer) o ‘Id-al-Adha or Al-Fitr prayer. Then he passed by the women and said, “O women! Give alms, as I have seen that the majority of the dwellers of Hell-fire were you (women).” They asked, “Why is it so, O Allah’s Apostle ?” He replied, “You curse frequently and are ungrateful to your husbands. I have not seen anyone more deficient in intelligence and religion than you. A cautious sensible man could be led astray by some of you.” The women asked, “O Allah’s Apostle! What is deficient in our intelligence and religion?” He said, “Is not the evidence of two women equal to the witness of one man?” They replied in the affirmative. He said, “This is the deficiency in her intelligence. Isn’t it true that a woman can neither pray nor fast during her menses?” The women replied in the affirmative. He said, “This is the deficiency in her religion.”
The Qur’an allows men to marry pre-pubescent girls, stipulating that Islamic divorce procedures shall apply to those who have not yet menstruated.
065.004 And for such of your women as despair of menstruation, if ye doubt, their period (of waiting) shall be three months, along with those who have it not. And for those with child, their period shall be till they bring forth their burden. And whosoever keepeth his duty to Allah, He maketh his course easy for him.
Muhammad was a deranged con man who has betrayed women. Muhammad has betrayed all of mankind, in fact. Here is some more of what Muhammad said and did:
Hadith, Bukhari, Volume 4, Book 54, Number 460:
Narrated Abu Huraira:
Allah’s Apostle said, “If a husband calls his wife to his bed (i.e. to have sexual relation) and she refuses and causes him to sleep in anger, the angels will curse her till morning.”
Hadith, Sahih Muslim, Book 008, Number 3371:
Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): 0 Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-‘azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid-conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Mes- senger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born.
“By him in Whose Hand lies my life, a woman can not carry out the right of her Lord, till she carries out the right of her husband. And if he asks her to surrender herself [to him for sexual intercourse] she should not refuse him even if she is on a camel’s saddle.” — Ibn Majah 1854
David says
I read none of that. Went to a shorter post.
William L Playfair, MD says
Actually, I read the post; it was long but I found it to be quite helpful.
mortimer says
PUTTING THE DIRTY KUFAAR IN THEIR PROPER PLACE! “TURHIBUNNA” (terrorize them). K.8.60
-from Sufi scholar Ahmad Sirhindi (1564-1624): “The honour of Islam lies in INSULTING kufr and kafirs. One who respects the kafirs dishonours the Muslims… The real purpose of levying jiziya on them is to HUMILIATE them to such an extent that they may not be able to dress well and to live in grandeur. They should constantly remain TERRIFIED and TREMBLING. It is intended to hold them under CONTEMPT and to uphold the honour and might of Islam.”
-from ibn Taymiyya, “Book of Emaan”: “… true believers show ANIMOSITY and HATRED towards disbelievers and NEVER support them.”
-from a lecture given by Sheikh Abdullah al-Faisal (H.A.): “The implication of al-Baraa is that one HATES for the sake of Allah (SWT)…Al-Baraa means to recognize who your enemies are and to HATE them and EXTERMINATE them in their Endeavour to get rid of your Deen, al-Islam…Al-Baraa is to HATE the people who propagate Baatil (falsehood)—the Muslim should HATE them and (at least desire to) KILL them when the time comes.”
-Imam Abdul-Latif ibn Abdur-Rahman Rahimullah said, “It is not possible for someone to realize Tawheed and act upon it, and yet not be HOSTILE against the mushrikeen. So anyone who isn’t HOSTILE against the mushrikeen, then it cannot be said that he acts upon Tawheed nor that he realizes it.” [ad-Durar as-Saniyyah 8/167]
-“The doctrine of al Walaa wal Baraa is the REAL IMAGE for the actual practice of this faith.” – source “Al Walaa wal Baraa According to the Aqeedah of the Salaf”, by Sheikh Muhammad Saeed al Qatani, authoritative Saudi Sharia lawyer and imam at the Abu Bakr and Al Furqan Mosques in Mecca. – https://islamfuture.wordpress.com/2009/08/20/al-wala-wal-bara-according-to-the-aqeedah-of-the-salaf-parts-123/
“The believers, men and women, are Awliyaa’ (helpers, supporters, friends, protectors) of one another; they enjoin (on the people) Al‑Ma‘roof (i.e. Islamic Monotheism and all that Islam orders one to do), and FORBID (people) from Al‑Munkar (i.e. POLYTHEISM and disbelief of all kinds, and all that Islam has FORBIDDEN)” – [al-Tawbah 9:71]
“Let there arise out of you a group of people inviting to all that is good (Islam), enjoining Al-Ma‘roof (i.e. Islamic Monotheism and all that Islam orders one to do) and FORBIDDING Al-Munkar (polytheism and disbelief and all that Islam has forbidden)” -[Aal ‘Imraan 3:104]
davej says
With Muslims a complaint that is rejected immediately escalates to violence. They have no sense of opposing views, golden rule or democracy, their only idea is to reach for the sword. Such people are unsuited to a civil society.
Logically-speaking says
Pat Condell said it all on You tube : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ydPZRoLzu-E
Ethel Red says
My wife was shopping in a local store and going down the aisle there was a woman in full Burka with a child in a carriage along with her man. The only way past was blocked by this filthy Islamic coward who would not move to allow her to proceed. My wife just stood there until finally he let her by. This is the way they want to treat white, non-believers, who are female and by themselves. I wish I had been there because this fucken , yellow coward would have received a good beating from me, but the yellow bastard would never had acted this way if a man had been with her. I was in another local grocery store this morning and a full Burka clad women with her man were there and she tried to act civily to us but now I view them all in a completely different way and SHE knows it now. I am afraid this example of how these Islamist Cowards treat women when they are alone is an awakening call to us. They want to behave like this is a Sharia Law country already. Liberty or Death you filthy Islamists and don’t forget you are the minority in my country.
gravenimage says
Ethel Red, Muslims are actually taught to do this–this is not just rudeness:
“Abu Huraira reported Allah’s Messenger as saying: Do not greet the Jews and the Christians before they greet you and when you meet any one of them on the roads force him to go to the narrowest part of it.” (Sahih Muslim Book 26, Hadith 5389).
There are many Hadith with slight variations on this demand. It is also a part of Shari’ah and the enforcement of dhimmitude.
In other words, Muslims should always block an Infidel’s way, or else force them into the gutter.
I have experienced this myself, where a group of Muslims will spread out across the sidewalk, making it impossible to pass.
epistemology says
In Europe the Germans are the ones who didn’t learn from their past. They regret Nazism but they don’t understand that Islam and Nazism are two of a kind. The grand mufti of Jerusalem was a buddy of Hitler’s and Hitler hated Judaism, despised Christendom and admired Islam.
The Germans’ goal is to be everybody’s darling, a very stupid idea. In our modern Western world it’s most important to keep our own values and standards and to defend them against Islam.
When in Rome do as the Romans do, this is what Muslims have to learn. Erotic lingerie is nothing special in a Western country. Those who don’t accept that should go to Saudi Arabia or Qatar. So please f**k off Muslims. .
Wellington says
Seconded, epistemology.
Alien Republican says
“The Germans’ goal is to be everybody’s darling, a very stupid idea.*
—
They sould first learn to love themselves.
“In Europe the Germans are the ones who didn’t learn from their past. ”
—
Hmmm. The UK certainly learnt not to appease again. France est grande again. As far as the Germans are concerned they haven’t learnt that they never were a master race but a class of slaves to be slaughtered by their elites. Sheep mostly. So much “Vergangenheitsbewältigung” and fingerpointing to Adolf and his mignons without an honest introsprection of what part of their mentality contributed to it.
gravenimage says
epistemology, there is also a lot of appeasement of Islam in countries without a Nazi past, so this is not the only factor.
Baucent says
She left her glove and phone. Well even German Police are likely to be able to solve this one.
The real issue here is Europe use to be a haven for those who fled the oppressive Islamic rule of countries this shopkeeper from “Arabic background” came from, such as Iran. Unfortunately after Mrs Merkel’s disasterous opening the doors to all muslims “refugees”, the crazy Shariah loving ones came as well and are now poisoning the water hole for those who enjoy the freedoms of the West.
Jayell says
Aren’t all Muslims ‘sharia-loving’ even if they try to kid us to the contrary? And therefore aren’t they all ‘poisoning our water-hole’ just by being on our patch? They ARE the poison. This case is utterly farcical and if you saw a scene on stage where the characters had their faces covered it would look like a total joke. It doesn’t take a genius to see that this muslim attire is a licence to crime; criminality is written into the Islamic code and you ‘d never normally trust anyone who hides their identity.
Baucent says
Clearly you don’t remember the Iranian Revolution and all those Iranians who left Iran as they didn’t want to live under Shariah law or wear a black sack. The answer is no, not all are Shariah lovers.
gravenimage says
Baucent, any Muslim who takes Islam seriously–that is, all who are not closet apostates–*do* want to impose Islam wherever they go.
Baucent says
There are a lot of closet apostates, who like to believe they are muslims. I’ve lived in a muslim country. There are a lot who are muslim at a very superficial and never have read the koran. I think a lot of you Americans who have never met a muslim find that hard to understand. It’s like those “Christians” who are never seen in a church except for a wedding or a funeral. Nominal believers, and there are nominal-muslims as well.
gravenimage says
Baucent wrote:
There are a lot of closet apostates, who like to believe they are muslims. I’ve lived in a muslim country. There are a lot who are muslim at a very superficial and never have read the koran.
……………………
Baucent, how many of these nominal Muslims actually stand against the savagery of Islam? How many of them would actually join with Infidels to fight against it? Damn few.
More:
I think a lot of you Americans who have never met a muslim find that hard to understand.
……………………
I live in Oakland, California, which has a large Muslim population. There is an Islamic Center just a few blocks from my home.
I have personally known three people slaughtered by Muslims–this still shocks me.
I was an acquaintance of Christopher Stevens when were at Berkeley in the History Department. He was later Ambassador to Libya, and was butchered by “Islamists” there in 2012.
I met Chauncey Bailey–the first American journalist assassinated on American soil in thirty years–numerous times when I was involved with the city’s adult literacy program, of which he was a great supporter.
He was gunned down by members of Your Black Muslim Bakery in 2007 when he was investigating that vicious Jihad outfit.
And I was friends with Mike Wills, who was a Barista at a cafe I regularly frequented at the time–Di Bartolo’s near Lake Merritt. He would take his smoking breaks out on the patio and he would check out my new artwork (I do a lot of my work in cafes).
He later became Sous Chef at Di Bartolo’s restaurant next door, and I didn’t see quite as much of him.
His girlfriend Liz always joked that cigarettes would be the death of him–he smoked several packs a day–and they were, but not the way she might have thought. He lived not far from Your Black Muslim Bakery in Emeryville, and was murdered when he went out one night for cigarettes. He was gunned down by a Muslim using an AK-47, who also killed a homeless man that night.
This happened earlier the same year that Chauncey Bailey was murdered. The killings were not solved until the big investigation following the journalist’s assassination.
I have had plenty of up close and personal experience with Muslims. Many of them appear outwardly friendly–but try asking them about women’s rights or their views on Jews, and a *very* different truth emerges.
More:
It’s like those “Christians” who are never seen in a church except for a wedding or a funeral. Nominal believers, and there are nominal-muslims as well.
……………………
Well, that’s right–except that Christianity does not demand the slaughter and subjugation of unbelievers, as Islam does.
I don’t care whether lax or nominal Muslims eat pork, drink beer, or ignore Ramadan.
What I care about is whether they actively reject the barbaric core tenets of Islam–there is no evidence that many of them actually do.
Here in the United States, over 50% of Muslims openly say that they want to see the imposition of brutal Shari’ah law. How many Muslims, nominal or otherwise, will actually oppose them? History has taught us that all too few will.
Jayell says
1. No, I don’t remember the Iranian revolution.
2. Why should people want to wear a label when they don’t like what the label represents? Might it be intellectual laziness? Or cowardice because of the consequences of apostasy in Islam? Either way, it’s not much of an excuse, is it?
gravenimage says
One more thing, Baucent–during the Iranian revolution in 1979 I had some of my artwork censored by Iranian students who were in the United States.
I had my first art show at the International House at Berkeley, and it included a nude figure of a fairy. It was very tasteful–there was nothing graphic about it at all. For instance, her flowing hair covered her breasts.
That didn’t matter–a group of Iranian students complained, and my art–all of it, not just the “offending” figure–was torn down, resulting in a great deal of damage to my work. They would not even let the work be covered up until I could take it down myself.
Are these the sort of “superficial” Muslims you had in mind? I suppose they were–at least they didn’t seek me out and murder me for running afoul of Shari’ah strictures.
abad says
Moslems should be deported from Germany. Every last one of them.
Alien Republican says
Merkel said again that “islam belongs to Germany”. If it wasn’t our neighbouring country I would gladly see them take 200 Millions and be finished for good. Oh wait – again – they are still sticking to the narrative that the influx will help to maintain population size (true) and economic prosperity with a young and qualified “workforce”. (Just get the millions of unemployed youth from southerin europe,, culturally much more compatible)
gravenimage says
I think she meant, “Germany belongs to Islam”–that will soon be the case if there is no reversal of these insane dhimmi policies there.
Guy Forester says
This crap started with WWI when the Kaiser was courting the Ottoman Empire to join his rampage. “I will be the sword of Islam.”
Hitler followed up by courting and supporting the grand mufti of Jerusalem, the rabid anti-Semite that helped organize a Bosnian Muslim SS unit.
David says
yep. The Nazis used Trains. Choo Choo ! I support you !
vladkoval_Ukraine says
Dagestan. Russia. Death of a Jihadi. (18+).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QKXiqTmQCzg
Guy Forester says
After Beslan, I do think there is much sympathy for certain groups, nor do the authorities hold anything back when dealing with them. Gives new meaning to the term roadkill.
gravenimage says
I especially like the guys who drive over this Jihadist.
I’m glad this Jihadist was taken out–but all too often, Russia appeases Muslims. They have, for instance, allowed Chechnya to set up a Shari’ah state on Russian soil.
pumbar says
On Jihadwatch one must not conform oneself to sensibilities;
“Britain is finished. The only people defending it from total collapse and capitulation to Sharia are thugs and hooligans and Jew-haters” – Robert Spencer
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/09/uk-university-probes-student-for-hate-crime-mocking-isis-allegedly-made-islamic-students-feel-threatened
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YkTl4Tq-JWw
gravenimage says
Bravo Tommy Robinson!
Guy Forester says
I got news for you. They do this to each other in their home countries as well. If one does not think the other is Islamic enough, out comes the knife or gun.
Wellington says
Tending to prove (once again) the four givens in life: 1) death; 2) taxes; 3) Muslims assaulting or killing non-Muslims; 4) Muslims assaulting or killing fellow Muslims.
Both 3) and 4) sometimes overlap with 1), and 4) is preferable to 3).
Zé says
And sometimes western governments use 2) and hand it out to low life parasites that engage into 3) and 4)…
Wellington says
Agreed.
pumbar says
Never use the definite article.
Wholly eschew the use of pronouns
A fellow cavalier attitude to English composition and usage.
Aquilan says
THEY BLAME THE COUNTRIES THEY ARE HAPPY IN!!
And they want to change the countries they’re happy in, to be like the countries they came from where they were unhappy.
Buddhists living with Hindus = No Problem
Hindus living with Christians = No Problem
Christians living with Shintos = No Problem
Shintos living with Confucians = No Problem
Confucians living with Bahai’s = No Problem
Bahai’s living with Jews = No Problem
Jews living with Atheists = No Problem
Atheists living with Buddhists = No Problem
Buddhists living with Sikhs = No Problem
Sikhs living with Hindus = No Problem
Hindus living with Bahai’s = No Problem
Bahai’s living with Christians = No Problem
Christians living with Jews = No Problem
Jews living with Buddhists = No Problem
Buddhists living with Shintos = No Problem
Shintos living with Atheists = No Problem
Atheists living with Confucians = No Problem
Confucians living with Hindus = No Problem
Now..
Muslims living with Hindus = Problem
Muslims living with Buddhists = Problem
Muslims living with Christians = Problem
Muslims living with Jews = Problem
Muslims living with Sikhs = Problem
Muslims living with Bahai’s = Problem
Muslims living with Shintos = Problem
Muslims living with Atheists = Problem
MUSLIMS LIVING WITH MUSLIMS = BIG PROBLEM!
http://steadyaku-steadyaku-husseinhamid.blogspot.my/2016/12/our-muslims-brothers-sisters-are-not.html
John Forbes says
BUT the WESTERN GOVERNMENTS INSIST we all parrot & BELIEVE ISLAM IS A RELIGION OF PEACE & VIOLENCE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH ISLAM ! OUR COWARDS AFTER EVERY ATTACK COME OUT WITH THIS UTTER RUBBISH – TERESA BEING THE FASTEST BY FAR !
QUICKS DRAW THE PARROT TERESA ! SHE IS LITERALLY TERRIFIED OF THIS IDEOLOGY !
Amber is not far behind & then there are the LABOR MAYORS -Andy Burnham – who declares the last bomber was not a MUSLIM – just a naughty boy !!
Sadiq Khan – LONDON – TERROR IS A PART OF EVERY DAY LIFE IN A BIG CITY – REALLY ??????????
TERRIFIED TERESA – SAYS – HE DOES A GOOD JOB – REALLY??? FOR ANJEM CHAUDRY MAYBE !!
gravenimage says
True, Guy.
D Austin says
That German welfare must be great!
Germany sees jump in citizenship applications from U.S.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/germany-sees-jump-citizenship-applications-u-163528202.html
gravenimage says
Germany: Veiled Muslima assaults shopkeeper for selling lingerie near Islamic headscarves
……………………….
More violent enforcing of Shari’ah. There will be more and more of this in the West.
Matthieu Baudin says
i’m not sure what the fuss is about. In Saudi Arabia it’s well known amongst hospital staff that wealthy Saudi women wear fashionable lingerie directly underneath their outer pius garb. The proximity of the two couldn’t be closer than that!
Guy Forester says
Meanwhile, western and Asian women were told to stop wearing tight-fitting jeans under the not so opaque abaya as they were too revealing.
Matthieu Baudin says
Yeh Guy, they should all go out and have a wine or a beer and relax. Womens forms are just fine as they are without unnecessary add – ons such as over the top ‘tents’, overly tight jeans or over priced lingerie.
Guest says
Of course u can’t identify her. She’s wearing that hideous veil. And aren’t those banned in Germany now?
Flavius Claudius Iulianus says
Off topic:
It’s September 8th – a national holiday in Malta [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victory_Day_%28Malta%29]. It marks the lifting of the Great Siege of Malta [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Siege_of_Malta] by the Turks.
duh swami says
How do they know the masked attacker was a woman?
Wellington says
Another good one, duh swami. My compliments.
martin says
Everyone knows it was a nasy islamophobe/racist who does not support muslims taking sex slaves of little girls and so did that to make out it was moral innocent bunny and kitten hugging muslim woman who llike muhamad would never do anything wrong or nasty to others.
I find it insulting that kuffar make out it was a muslima and I am suffering so horribly that I am too scared to leave my home/bomb making factory.
This islamophobia must be MADE to stop.
Hee hee….
Keith Jordan says
For security, I think we have a right to see people’s faces. My bank even requires me to take my hat off. What would they do with a veiled Muslima?
D Austin says
It is unlawful in many US states to obscure your face in public for non-weather reasons, which is going to generate a rather predictable result — getting arrested on the idea of prevention of a possible crime.
Walking into (say) a bank with a face mask on to open a bank account is probably the polar opposite of how that particular task should be done correctly. The authorities are going to make sure the person also finds the antic unfunny.
A federal statute from the post-Reconstruction period, 18 USC § 241, makes it a crime “If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured” by the Constitution and laws of the United States.
This was aimed at the Ku Klux Klan, but it would apply equally well to any terrorists who wear masks to frighten people and hinder them from exercising their legal rights.
Valkyrie Ziege says
; Why are Muhammadans being admitted into countries with strict laws against admitting anyone who is anti-Jewish/anti-Semitic?
Tom says
This type of crime and the lack of ability for police to be able to identify a criminal, even with security camera footage, due to a face covering is more impetus for legislation banning face coverings of any kind in public.
The police should be pressuring the government to create such legislation in the interest of public safety. Otherwise Germans should start wearing masks while in public just to emphasize the security risk it poses.
Lorensacho says
Maybe the Muslima is enraged at her own suppression and is taking it out on that which reminds her of her plight.
gravenimage says
I wouldn’t count on that…
TheBuffster says
“Germany: Veiled Muslima assaults shopkeeper for selling lingerie near Islamic headscarves”
Does this mean hijabis don’t wear underwear? 😀
martin says
Not on hadj in mecca.
It used to be done naked around the pagan fertility god black stone from the pagan kabbah with the bit they kiss shaped like a womans private parts
Now they wear a robe.
Andy says
Here is something I came across and wanted to share:
Do Europeans still feel at HOME in Europe???
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CyuDRlbfVdU
JOHN L SCHARF says
Put it in the tampon section.
martin says
Islamic morality…………….
Still too many people in our countries are totally unaware of how totally contradictory those 2 words are.
So let us give others a little help here..
Muhamad is considered by muslims to be the best man ever, indeed his actions, teachings and examples are the defanition of muslim, whom all muslims must emulate or be considered non muslim. an apostate… death sentence.
It is simple folks, urge people to do a simple google for ‘muhamads sexual perversions’
Web sites, articles, videos….. all citing the MAINSTREAM islamic sources quran, hadith etc. – chapter and verse.
Whilst most of them are by non muslims or x muslims with a bit of searching you might find yourself watching a video or seeing an article where its by none of the above but by a muslim trying to justify sex with children (girls or boys even babies), corpses, animals etc. because muhamad did it. Makes a nice change from muslims making out that nothing in quran and/or hadith etc are things that are in quran and/or hadith etc.
When others find out just what evil perverted filth muhamad was and that muslims revere him so and see nothing wrong with it……
Isabellathecrusader says
Yeah, so if you’re trying to make a moral statement and be all moral and uphold morality and everything, if the other person doesn’t listen, by all means, beat the crap out of them. Because that is such a moral thing to do.
Islam is completely logical.
Susette says
Muslims are indoctrinated from birth to beleive that they are superior to all; that a sky God named “allah” whispered via an angel in a cave to a murderous pedophile that every vile thing he was instructed to do against humanity was “religiously endorsed.” His allah set forth all the patriarchal rules for the men to impose on muslim women and all non-muslims. (I don’t say non-beleivers, because it’s not possible to believe in a demonic, hateful, vile ideology disguised as a “religion” – I actually don’t like any form of religion.) As a result, when these inbred, vile, low IQ men brought thier families to Western countries, they arrived with an empty toolbox for living in peaceful, egalitarian, democratic societies. Their only tools are hate and destruction. And so it goes…on and on and on…till Western countries rid themselves of this evil invasion.
Karina says
Now Arabs are attacking each other….