Last week, Jihad Watch reported on the controversy over the Islamic Society of New Hampshire, noting that the New Hampshire Union Leader story didn’t deign to provide any details about what the claims being made about the mosque actually were. This report gives those details, and shows that the mosque is indeed one that should be investigated. Manchester police chief Nick Willard should resign in disgrace for disparaging the investigation of the mosque without examining the evidence. Instead, he will probably be promoted.
“Hiding in plain sight: New Hampshire mosque preaches terrorism,” by James Simpson, Bombthrowers, September 6, 2017:
A concerned New Englander recently arranged for the assessment of the Islamic Society of New Hampshire’s (ISoNH) mosque in Manchester in that state. He had noticed a disproportionate number of military-age males visiting the mosque and heard from many local women who said they were frightened by the attitudes some of these men expressed toward them. The results of the man’s research were more frightening.
P. David Gaubatz, co-author of Muslim Mafia, was hired to assess this mosque. He is a former Air Force Office of Special Investigations (OSI) federal agent who specialized in Islamic counter-intelligence and counter-terrorism. According to his book, he worked and lived in the Middle East for decades and was the first civilian federal agent in Iraq at the start of Operation Iraqi Freedom (March 2003). That year he led a 15-man team to extract family members of the Iraqi lawyer who helped save Army Private First Class Jessica Lynch. He has investigated over 280 mosques in the U.S. alone and uses a rating system developed by a former Islamist, Tafik Hamid.
U.S. Islamists and their allies in the American Left have long sought to discredit this rating system as contrived nonsense created by Islamophobes, but that very effort calls into question their motives, expertise, and integrity. Tafik Hamid is a former member of Jamaa Islamiya (also known as al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya or, in English, Islamic Group), — an Egyptian organization branded a terrorist group by the U.S. government, the United Kingdom, and the European Union. Al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri was a member of this group, as was Omar Abdel-Rahman, the so-called “blind sheikh” convicted as the mastermind behind the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. Hamid has long since abandoned his radicalism and has become a widely-recognized Islamic reformer.
The rating system is based on numerous factors readily observant by how strictly the mosque conforms to Islamic standards and how aggressively it promotes Shariah (Islamic law). For example, are men and women allowed to worship in the same room? What kind of dress is mandatory, e.g. must women wear a niqab or hijab? Can they get away with a modern form of hijab? How does the imam dress? Details like rings worn and style of pants indicate the imam’s devotion to Wahhabism or other Islamic sects and to Shariah itself.
The imam’s dedication to Shariah is especially important because Shariah is a doctrine of political dominance and conquest, and Muslims who promote it are likely to promote jihad as a means to impose it.
The system also rates the mosque based on messages taught in sermons. For example, does the mosque promote the killing of gays, killing for apostasy, stoning women for infidelity, and Shariah-sanctioned slavery?
Gaubatz found that ISoNH was strictly observant and promoted all these ideas and more. Using a 1 to 10 rating scale, with 10 being the worst, Gaubatz assigned a grade of 10 for Shariah compliance and 9 for jihadist potential. He concluded:
The ISoNH is a Sunni/Saudi and Pakistani front for Islamic based terrorist groups such as Al Qaeda and ISIS. This mosque had very violent materials inside for worshippers that advocate the overthrow of America and physical Jihad against U.S. and Israeli targets. This is based on the mosque having the same Islamic manuals in their possession that Islamic terrorist groups utilize for their training. The ISoNH had material written and edited by a convicted Islamic terrorist supporter (Ali Al Timimi). The Imam and mosque worshippers were extremely Shariah compliant. ISIS and Al Qaeda would find this mosque acceptable for their training and education of Mujahideen fighters (Islamic terrorists).
Some of the literature referred to is shown in the below graphic:
A Brief Illustrated Guide to Understanding Islam was edited by twelve Islamic “scholars.” I have circled two names. Ali Al-Timimi — whom Gaubatz referenced — is now serving a life sentence for terrorism. Sheik Jamal Zarabozo is considered “too extreme” even for some Islamists as he advocates stoning to death for “heretics.”
Another brochure promoted at the mosque is Jihad in Islam. This 33-page document makes clear that the goals of Islam are to subjugate the world. Under the heading What Jihad Really Is? (sic) it states:
In reality Islam is a revolutionary ideology and programme which seeks to alter the social order of the whole world and rebuild it in conformity with its own tenets and ideals. ‘Muslim’ is the title of that International Revolutionary Party organized by Islam to carry into effect its revolutionary programme. And ‘Jihād’ refers to that revolutionary struggle and utmost exertion which the Islamic Party brings into play to achieve this objective…
…Islam requires the earth—not just a portion, but the whole planet—not because the sovereignty over the earth should be wrested from one nation or several nations and vested in one particular nation, but because the entire mankind should benefit from the ideology and welfare programme or what would be truer to say from ‘Islam’ which is the programme of well-being for all humanity. Towards this end, Islam wishes to press into service all forces which can bring about a revolution and a composite term for the use of all these forces is ‘Jihad’. (p. 5)
Many U.S. mosques are little more than meeting places and training centers for Islamic terrorists. For example, the Tsarnaev brothers and many other terrorists regularly attended the Islamic Society of Boston. Why is it still open?…
Following are some of their comments as published in Manchester’s Union Leader:
Alderman Chairman Patrick Long: “Personally this hate talk has no place in this city, that’s just my opinion.”
Alderman-at-Large Dan O’Neil: “There is no need in the city of Manchester for hatred. I know this board won’t stand for it; our citizens won’t stand for it.”
Manchester Chief of Police Nick Willard: “What [Gaubatz] wrote in this piece of paper is slanderous. I do not believe the mosque is a hotbed for terrorism. I don’t trust this gentleman’s research. I think he is trying to sell a book. I think the guy is a crackpot and I don’t believe we have those issues in this city.
As quoted in the newspaper, Gaubatz responded:
I get that same reaction a lot of the time. They don’t want to admit they have a problem in their area and it took an outsider to find it and identify it.
Gaubatz added to those remarks during a telephone interview for this article:
In response to Chief Willard’s ill-considered remarks I say this: ‘Chief Willard is a poor excuse for a senior law enforcement officer. He has no clue what to look for in a mosque. The tax payers of his community deserve a Chief who supports them and not mosque leaders who support the teachings of ISIS. Finally, I do not receive any royalties for my book, so it is both ignorant and insulting to dismiss my report as an effort to sell books. It was provided for the benefit and as a warning to the Manchester community. What does the Chief care more about, Manchester or the mosque?’…
The answer to that question is quite clear. Willard should resign, or be fired. He won’t be, of course.
Read the rest here.
bekblue says
Pat Condell is absolutely correct in everything he said. How long do you think it will take before YouTube wipes it out?
Bob says
Think about the fact that the muslins moved into NH where a large number of morons from Mass have migrated. The muslims know the can manipulating these unfortunate slugs into any thing the want. Not to mention the significant voter fraud they are into as well. Look at Vermont, they are next with the assistance of Bernie Sanders.
John Forbes says
YOU TUBE will wipe it out because the LEFT seems to be in control all over & wants few to understand just how dangerous this IDEOLOGY is for Democracies !
There is a strange alliance between the left & islam that I find bewildering !
Both seek to destroy WESTERN DEMOCRACY ??
Our so called leaders also seem to side with the LEFT which I see as TREASON !!
Wellington says
I know New Hampshire quite well. Have spent a lot of time there. It is a beautiful state that I have come to love. So, this article saddens me especially so. Drives home and all that, goes to the heart. It seems that the menace and cancer which is Islam really does intend to take over all the earth.
It must be stopped. No more excuses. No more crap about so-called moderate Muslims. No more crap about how Islam is peaceful and noble and it’s just been hijacked by some extremists. You judge an ideology based on what it says and never by the fact that some adherents of that ideology don’t fully implement its tenets. And Islam says it will conquer the earth in the name of Allah. It to this very day calls for death for any Muslim who converts to another religion. It to this very day calls for death or severe bodily harm for anyone criticizing the religion, its founder (there was an extra twisted corkscrew of a human being for you) or its holy book, the Koran, which is the most wretched excuse for a holy book ever written. There are well over one hundred passages in it calling for war to be made upon non-Muslims “until all religion is with Allah.” {Sura 8:39} It oozes hatred on almost every page towards non-Muslims (examples being Sura 60:4 and Sura 98:6). And there is no love in Islam, just submission. No romantic love (Valentine’s Day is hated in the Islamic world). No love of non-Muslims. Not even love of the fictional Allah, who is to be served, obeyed and submitted to completely. And in an Islamic court of law it requires two women’s testimony to equal that of one man’s. Right in the Koran is condoned the hitting of women (e.g., Sura 4:34 which states, “If you fear disobedience from your women, admonish them and send them to beds apart and beat them”).
Islam is an enemy of freedom, equality under the law, women’s rights and a true Golden Rule for all. I detest it and it must once and for all be exposed for the putrid excuse of a religion which it is. There is no other religion like it on the face of the earth. It must be stopped.
John B says
Was watching an Italian cooking show on youtube and they talked about how “fantastic” the islamic influence was on Sicilian cuisine (raisins and saffron – that was it!) and how they ruled southern Italy, using Palermo as their main base – and I wanted to throw up. Didn’t even bat an eye that these savages had come in murdering their people, taking them as slaves and had to be “driven out.” Guess raisins and saffron made all those deaths and subjugation over all those years worth it!
gravenimage says
Disgusting, John B–I have heard this sort of pap many times myself.
gravenimage says
Only slightly off-topic–I listen to quite a bit of music on Youtube, and often there are short ads or movie trailers before the music plays. Well, just now, I found a trailer for a film starting in a couple of weeks starring Judi Dench as Queen Victoria. Ordinarily, this is something I certainly might consider interesting–at least worth checking out the reviews.
But this no standard bio-pic–it is, even from the trailer, an obvious load of pro-Islam spam.
It is called–this sounds like a joke, but it is not–“Victoria and Abdul”. A young Muslim comes from India (probably what today is Pakistan). Victoria is bored and possibly senile, but she perks right up when the “cute” Abdul shows up.
She asks Abdul to “teach her Urdu and the Koran”–the whole point of this revisionist history is that the English Queen has a great deal to learn from Islam.
Her courtiers and advisers disapprove–but are made to look like a bunch of intolerant “Islamophobes” for doing so.
I’m lucky I didn’t heave all over my key board.
Ali Fazal–the actor who plays Abdul–rather cryptically Tweeted “Not again…God no” after the Jihad terror attacks on London Bridge.
Was he actually condemning the attacks, or just irked that Jihadists were going to get more bad press in the West? Entirely unclear.
But he is certainly happy to do his part to make if seem as though Islam has been influential in Britain for a very long time–and that the presence of Mohammedans makes Britons happy. *Ugh*.
PRCS says
Always keep a spare keyboard available–for just those possibilities.
Jack Diamond says
Ah, Judi Dench. M. No wonder James Bond never faces off the Muslims and Islam.
Which is why James Bond has become am antiquated relic.
gravenimage says
Grimly necessary, PRCS. 🙂
Yes, Jack–even though Jihad is mushrooming, when was the last time a movie hero battled violent Muslims?
gravenimage says
And it is–of course–not just New Hampshire. This Muslim savagery is in every state in the union.
Barry says
You are 100 percent right.
David Grisez says
This article show the need for Mosques to be investigated. Mosques that are promoting Jihad, Terrorism, Sharia Law and overthrow of the United States Government are not promoting religion and should be shut down for these activities.
Flavius Claudius Iulianus says
Close it. Charge those responsible.
PRCS says
If there are videos, make the clerics AND the eagerly nodding shitbirds in attendance–yes, Manchester’s very own Muslim shitbirds–famous.
And if there are videos, make sure the town council and the police chief get personal copies and that there’s follow up reportage.
And make sure the town’s residents get to view the videos and have an opportunity to ask appropriate questions.
As Sharia May might say, “enough is enough”.
Chris Norman says
Has Mr. Gaubatz reported the findings of his investigation to the FBI? Send a copy of the report to President Trump and to Secretary Sessions. Send your report to the Center for Security Policy, @ClaremLopez and @frankgaffney.
mortimer says
Listen up, New Hampshire. This is just the beginning. They will soon attack you and everything you hold dear. Islam is a viper you have taken into your bosom.
gravenimage says
New Hampshire mosque preaches jihad terror, necessity for Islam to conquer the world
…………………..
This is mainstream Islam, and should not surprise.
But we should not put up with this sick incitement to violence in the civilized West.
R Russell says
So, what’s new? They have been saying this since Mohammed’s day. They are just nearing the time when they will be able to carry it out.
There is only one spiritual power which is able to overthrow the Muslim one. It will either happen now if we recognise our peril and submit to the superior Power, or it will happen in the relatively near future when there will be a battle possibly headed by the Mahdi on the Islamic side and the King of Kings on the other side.
This is not mumbo jumbo. It comes from a source never proven wrong in context.
Politicianaphobia says
Imams in Canada are preaching hate –they want their “beautiful Shari’ah in Canada. Where are the politicians–telling the voters to be quiet– charge them with treason. Shhhhh treason is a bad word. My god who would have thunk it?
Lydia says
It’s like that phrase: “Okay, but now tell me how you REALLY feel!”
And at times, they do.
terry says
This mosque could not be any more “in your face you dirty kafir”, yet they line up like good little dhimmis to submit.
We are our own worst enemy.