The Qur’an teaches that Infidel women can be lawfully taken for sexual use (cf. its allowance for a man to take “captives of the right hand,” 4:3, 4:24, 23:1-6, 33:50, 70:30). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused. And ever is Allah Forgiving and Merciful.” (33:59) The implication there is that if women do not cover themselves adequately with their outer garments, they may be abused, and that such abuse would be justified.
But anyone in Nashua, New Hampshire who might have cautioned concern about Muslim “refugees” based on those teachings would have been dismissed as a greasy Islamophobe.
“Nashua man accused of sexually assaulting girls,” by Andy Hershberger, WMUR, September 20, 2017 (thanks to Robert):
A Nashua man is facing accusations that he had inappropriate contact with several young girls.
Mohammod Rafique is facing six charges, including two counts of felonious sexual assault. Nashua police said the incident happened in late August and involves four girls, including a 7-year-old.
“We’re alleging these offenses have had a great and substantial effect on both them and their parents,” prosecutor Don Topham said.
Rafique was described in court as a refugee from Myanmar who has lived in Nashua for two years. An interpreter was provided by phone.
Authorities said the charges involve inappropriate touching and happened at some sort of gathering.
“Through the investigation, we learned that he was acquainted with one girl’s family,” Lt. Kerry Baxter said. “He had attempted to offer them money and gifts and things like that to get one or more of the girls back to his house.”
Court records said when the girls interviewed, they gave essentially the same version of what happened….
PRCS says
THEY ARE NOT DANGEROUS,
THEY ARE IN DANGER!
# REFUGEES WELCOME
http://tinyurl.com/ydf8sbhj
PaulM says
Come on, leave him alone. He is just practicing his religion. Remember we have freedom of religion in North America. Oh….wait…..Freudian slip there….freedom of religion that is for Islam and Muslims only. Please bear in mind that his founder was the epitome of moral, ethical, upright, peace loving behavior who was forced to dry hump babies and little girls, and repeatedly rape his little 9 year old wife over and over. Don’t forget, Allah made him do that….SO, it is ok. Now everybody just move, come on folks, move on here nothing to see, nothing that is but some sick, sexually deviant, slimy pervert doing what the Quran tells him to do and that is abuse and rape babies and little girls. And even better, if they are not Muslim.
John Forbes says
THE US CITIZENS NEED TO LOOK AT ANDREW NORFOLK – AN UNCOMFORTABLE TRUTH ( LONDON TIMES CHIEF INVESTIGATOR) & ALSO READ EASY MEAT – PETER MCLOCKLIN OR LISTEN TO SARAH CHAMPION – LABOR MEMBER FOR ROTHERHAM TO SEE JUST HOW BAD THIS HAS BECOME IN THE UK – & THE BRITISH CANNOT STOP THIS !
NEW LABOR KNEW ABOUT THIS TWO DECADES AGO – HID IT & DENIED IT & THE BBC ALSO LIED ABOUT IT !
THE DUTCH HAVE THE PROBLEM WITH MUSLIM MOROCCANS & IT IS GETTING BIGGER .
BOTH LEGAL & POLICE SYSTEMS CANNOT COPE & BOTH HAVE DENIED THEIR VULNERABLE PROTECTION !
THE HORROR IS THAT THE ELITE – BEING THE COWARDS THEY ARE – ARE QUITE WILLING TO SACRIFICE VULNERABLE CHILDREN TO HIDE THEIR COWARDICE & PROTECT FAILED IDEOLOGIES & THE PUBLIC NEED TO BE AWARE .
SO GREAT IS THE ROT THAT THE POLICE IN THESE PLACES – ENGLISH TOWNS- REFUSED TO INVESTIGATE OR ARREST CHILD RAPISTS EVEN WHEN THE CHILD & THE PARENTS CAME TO REPORT BRUTAL GANG RAPING >
IT IS A DISGRACE THAT THE BRITISH & OTHER EUROPEAN COUNTRIES NEED TO BE REMINDED OF at every opportunity & every meeting should opened- WITH WHAT HAVE YOU MANAGED TO DO ABOUT YOUR CHILD RAPING ISSUES !!
carpediadem says
Can you please type in normal letters, capital letters are the equivalent of shouting and few people read messages in capitals.
Thanks.
cee says
PRCS…. you are joking right?
Wellington says
Of course PRCS is joking. The fact that you didn’t get this immediately helps to even further explain your dense 9:29 P.M. comment below.
Please do more homework before embarrassing yourself any more than you already have.
Save Europe says
Indeed. For ‘Myanmar’ replace with ‘identical ethnicity to a Bangladeshi’ who doesn’t belong anywhere other than in Bangladesh. The Leftist Western media portrays the Rohingya as all innocent, whereas they never discuss ARSA, their terrorist group.
Frank Donohue says
We had 8 years of Obama telling us to let these heathens into the country and embrace them. Hopefully, his daughters never experience such violence but if they do, they have their idiot father to thank.
Martha Donelson-Green says
He needs prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law for this crime against a child.
I hope this means deported.
Voytek Gagalka says
Castrate this Mohammedan bastard!
mariam rove says
And we keep importing them. M
gravenimage says
New Hampshire: Muslim “refugee” charged with sexually assaulting 4 girls, including 7-year-old
……………………….
Another “rapefugee”. These poor girls.
gary says
Guys Guys. Settle down. You wouldn’t want to be accused of being Islamophobic.
PRCS says
Actually, I would.
Sons of Liberty says
I am a PROUD Islamophobe ! This guy needs to be deported out of here along with ALL THE OTHER , SO CALLED REFUGEES. I wrote my Senator about the State Department bringing in these Muslims against the will of the people. WE HAVE TO STOP THIS NOW ! We the PEOPLE MUST ACT. We are PAYING for our DAUGHTERS to be sexually assaulted by these MUSLIMS. They are doing what the Qur’an tells them to do , and our STUPID POLITICIANS DON’T SEEM TO CARE. This is insanity.
Keith Jordan says
A phobia is an excessive and irrational fear reaction. That’s the dictionary definition. If I had an excessive and irrational fear of anything, I would not be proud of it. Are you sure you are one?
Pat Dunn says
His reaction is neither excessive nor irrational. This whole situation with Muslim refugees is a huge culture clash! They are not likely to assimilate to our cultural values, so they should be moved to another country where they can be comfortable practicing their own values…I’m not willing to adapt to their perverted ideals!
Fred K says
There is no such thing as an islamophobe. To be one you would have an irrational fear of muslims. A real justified fear is not a phobia. When you know their pseudo religion/government, you develop not so much of a fear, but loathing. They are taught to be evil, and the koran justifies it through sharia law.
Wellington says
Muslim men with infidel females is a prescription for both tragedy and crime (but not a crime per Muslimthink). God how I detest Islam. No one of sense and knowledge can possibly have a positive opinion of this religion.
Yes, it is impossible to have both sense and knowledge and think of Islam in positive terms. You must be ignorant, foolish or malevolent to give Islam a thumbs up. What a disgusting excuse for a religion. And what first-class useful idiocy you must be possessed of if you are a non-Muslim and think Muslim immigration to Western nations is just fine, examples of such influential useful idiots being Theresa May, Barack Obama (now out of office but still very influential), Pope Francis I, Justin Trudeau and Angela Merkel. The sin upon their heads forever.
cee says
Islam can not be called a religion, more like an ideology…
Wellington says
Islam is a religion all right. So is Satanism. How many times must I post here the question, where is it written that a religion must be good?
Anyway, for First Amendment purposes here in America, Islam is definitely a religion. It’s a road to legal Nowheresville to argue otherwise.
And you aver that Islam is “merely” an ideology. Uh-huh. Care to name any religion which is not an ideology? Yeah, give it a shot and “best” me here.
Do more homework next time before posting. A lot more homework. Truly, I have become exceedingly tired of people with such little knowledge posting comments so revealing of how much little knowledge they really have.
If I sound exasperated, it is because I am. Islam, with all its nefarious intents, must be fought “smart like.” Asserting that Islam is not a religion as any starting point is “dumb like.”
Learn this.
gravenimage says
Agreed, Wellington. Islam is a religion, all right–an evil one.
Frank Anderson says
Wellington, I dare say that our qualifications to state opinions and our conclusions are fairly equal; and I am giving you the “benefit of the doubt” to allow that. I agree in fact with much of what you write. I also think making a “final, non-appealable” decision is most likely an error. Have you appointed yourself a new prophet, whose words are final, complete and perfect? Are you becoming what you fear? Islam, like Communism, Nazism, Central American human sacrificial religions, Baal worship, and how many other evil practices, may be a “religion”, But it may not be a religion that is “protected” under the law because it advocates, directs and inspires (“aids, abets, counsels, and acts in furtherance of”) illegal conduct.
In Wisconsin v Yoder, the state won on the issue of forcing a basic education, but lost on forcing completion of high school. In approximately 27 Jehovah’s Witness cases before the US Supreme Court at the time of my taking and passing 2 bar examinations in 1980 and 81, JW’s won on voluntary denial of medical treatment for adults, but not children. How many cases have been overturned when a new case is presented. Take a look at Will v, Michigan, and compare the ruling with Hafer v. Melo, decided in the same year. You might also look at Parden v Terminal Railways of the Alabama State Docks and compare it to Hornady Truck Lines involving a loss and then reversal on the issue of state sovereign immunity. If the Supreme Court can change its “mind” what is your problem with proposing and discussing an argument?
As many issues have gone unresolved for years, decades and even a century or two here and there because they were not imagined to be subject to challenge, drawing your “final” declaration of Islam’s status as not only a “religion” but a “protected religion” is to me an error. We have exchanged before. I don’t care about your pompous declarations of greatness when you blow about those who dare to disagree with you. Unlike I see in your comments, I acknowledge that I may be in error. Are you seeing yourself as a reincarnation of THE PROPHET?
One of the best teachers I had in law school almost 40 years ago, who taught me a WHOLE lot, was a person who disagreed with me on many subjects. You don’t make the final case; nor do I. But following the Jewish teaching, shown on page 711 of the Gates of Prayer in use in the early 1990’s, “ASK every question repeatedly”. “Cherish your doubts, because doubt is the handmaiden of truth; it is the acid which eats away at the false.” Doubt and questions lead to new ideas and better possibilities. Until this question of the protected status of a “religion” which openly advocates defiance and violation of every law in civilized society is litigated and appealed to a final ruling, and possibly re-litigated several times, your pontification is hot air. It will be a cold day in an extremely hot place before I accept your command to shut up, or your insults because I dare to disagree with you. It would not surprise me that others may feel the same. Lighten up! Many of your opinions are valuable and shared. Some deserve challenge, just like mine.
PaulM says
Frank, I hope you do not mind me interjecting. I think that you are missing the point. All know that Islam and Muslims are not a literally “protected by Law” religion. (Except in Canada now).
The point that is being very clearly made and correctly so, is that in the vast majority (worldwide) of criminal and civil cases being brought against these scumbags, they are all, each and every one of them being granted dismissals or lighter sentences than “J” walkers get. Usually dismissals. This amounts to, for all intents and purposes to a “Get Out of Jail Free” card.
And that is the point. If you or I committed these same heinous crimes we would be prosecuted, and rightly so, to the fullest extent of the law and be incurring very long jail terms or execution. Not these scumbags and perverts, they essentially and literally go free.
As you well know, “Not only must the Law be seen to be impartial, it must also be impartial”. In reality it is the farthest thing from that.
There is not one “Legal System” on this planet that is applying the “Law” impartially to this slime that is Islam. Ergo, they are indeed being “protected” by the Law, that being those responsible for applying those very “Laws”. They are not doing so, The Politicians and Prosecutors and Judges responsible for upholding the Law are every bit as cruel, malicious and evil as the vermin they are “saving” from having these laws applied to them. They are indeed PROTECTED BY LAW.
Frank Anderson says
Paulm, I never thought that exchanges here are exclusive. To me this is a good place to discuss and think, though not necessarily in that order. I think you are correct that Islam is now a “protected religion” because of people who will not try to find approaches to challenge its protection. Slavery in the United States was protected until someone finally said “ENOUGH” and challenged it. Discriminatory conduct has gone on until changes in the law began the quest to eliminate it. It is still here: just listen to all the racist remarks and look at the racist actions from many directions. Saying absolutely without any room for challenge that Islam is a religion absolutely beyond challenge as to the protection afforded to law-abiding religious activities is surrendering.
I wrote what may be one of the first research articles challenging the failure to protect “whistleblowers” or as described by NASA whistleblower Bill Bush, “ethical resisters”. Then I tested that research by litigation. Because of the complicated facts and biases my cases were neither abject failures nor shining successes. But they never fell flat. Prior to that period, not necessarily because of my research or article, whistleblowers essentially committed professional suicide by performing their duty to uphold the law. I certainly did. EVERYTHING that identified me before I blew the whistle on the theft of approximately $200 million in present value, except my law licenses (2) is gone. I found a way for future whistleblowers to perform their duty, protect themselves and move on with their lives. Others have certainly improved the prospects and options beyond my work. But from no options new options were found, tested and made better and stronger because people question the accepted word of “prophets”. I suggest that the de facto protection and recognition of Islam as a “protected” religion can be found if someone looks for it. Thank you for your comment.
Wellington says
Frank Anderson: All right. At a very, very highly theoretical level, it is possible that some day the judicial branch of the USA will declare Islam not a religion. The hurdles in doing so are so high that for all intents and purposes it simply is not going to happen. What I have proposed before here at JW, also a very theoretical possibility, is that Congress could pass an act (or joint resolution), then signed by a President, which would make Islam not a religion for First Amendment purposes, perhaps even banning it, and in said act or joint resolution, pursuant to Article III. Section 2, disallow federal court review of this measure. A third possibility, also theoretically in the clouds, is to add a new Amendment to the Constitution making Islam the exception to First Amendment religious protection. But what are the chances any of this will occur? As close to zero as can be without actually being at zero I would argue.
Also, don’t forget that secular totalitarian ideologies like Nazism and Marxism, while of course not religions for First Amendment purposes, are still protected by the First Amendment free speech provision, as Islam would be if it “merely” lost its First Amendment freedom of religion protection. I mean the American Communist Party, which has existed since 1919 I believe, was legal throughout the Cold War and even down to this day irrespective of the fact that Marxism calls for the violent overthrow of the capitalistic system and the extermination of the upper and middle classes (it’s right in Marxism, the class struggle theory, along with some other bogus theories like determinism, dialectical materialism, the theory of alienation and the labor value theory). Nazism too would do away with so much protected by the Constitution, it would shred the Constitution if given the opportunity, and yet Neo-Nazism is also legal in America down to the present day.
So, you are apparently seeking that Islam not be considered a religion AND be banned as well even though Marxism and Nazism are not banned. Do you not see how what you seek is so unlikely to occur that it amounts to that almost zero possibility I already mentioned. You correctly pointed out that certain religious practices are banned. Well, of course they are. Freedom of belief is absolute. Freedom of action has limits.
As for my becoming what I fear, you can believe this if you want to. I don’t really care. I’m not trying to shut down any kind of debate but I have tried to function in the realm of reality rather than Borkian theory land which seems to be where you reside. The realistic approach that I have taken all along is not to have Islam not considered a religion, which is a complete waste of time, but rather to have it looked upon as a malevolent religion. Then go from there because so much else will fall into place beneficially to America should this first step occur.
Frank Anderson says
Wellington, I welcome your comments, and particularly this one. At least you are recognizing the totally agreed at the moment long shot that a case can be presented and won that determines, not whether Islam is a “religion”, but whether it is a “protected religion” and if so or not, to what extent is it “protected”? Like my fight over performing my legal duty to expose crime and fraud, that has lasted at this time 35 years, 1400 years of crime and fraud in the name of Islam is not going to be recognized and resolved overnight. It will never be resolved unless people resist with every means available within the bounds of the law. Infidels are bound by the law, while muslims are not. Please accept my compliments and best wishes. We both seek the same goal and are trying to find ways that will work. I ask you to let people muse on the subject: Someone may come up with an idea that we have missed.
PaulM says
I am a ardent student of history, and the sad reality is, that historically, when fascists such as Muslims or their equivalent get “out of hand” the only way out from under their jackboots is through violence. I truly believe that some day very soon, you will see one hell of a lot of extreme violence. I have a few millennial German friends and every single one of them are getting angrier by the day and the general very vociferous consensus is that very soon, if Merkel et al do not do something about Islam and Muslims that they are more than willing to take care of the “problem” themselves through violence. And frankly, I do not blame them. Only a coward and a fool will sit idly by and watch little girls and young ladies beaten and raped and have their culture destroyed by imbeciles and unemployed fascist bums whom are doing so in the name of their religion. All they are waiting for is for their fellow countrymen to rise up in enough numbers as to be willing to go up against “the law”, that being the gutless cowards that run their country. History confirms that this will happen. The sooner the better.
Diane says
Wellington – I certainly hate the tenets of Islam….but man, your ARROGANCE is astounding. Though your words are intelligent, I sense a CLEAR DISDAIN for PEOPLE THAT DON’T THINK LIKE YOU. I’m sorry, but I think it really hurts your case. You could be the most intelligent person in the world, educating people on topics that are not commonly understood, but all I can perceive is your arrogance. It’s so blinding, I think it will discourage many people from truly appreciating the information you provide. I was heartened to see your recent follow-up response to Frank Anderson, which seemed more measured. Obviously, Frank is very intelligent, too, so maybe it’s easier for you to “tolerate” him, and feel less exasperated. But, really, there are common, everyday folks who are also intelligent, but maybe just in a more street-smart, down-to-earth way. It doesn’t make them stupid. Everybody has a different form of intelligence, and I’ve often found that some of the least “book-smart” people, have the most EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE. They may not be highly educated, but they often have a lot of love in their heart, and it goes a long way.
Carolyne says
There is a cult of fundamental Christians centered around Middlesboro KY which believes that if one is “Right with God,” they will be able to pick up and handle rattlesnakes and God will forbid the snake to harm them. A few years ago the minister’s wife was bitten by the snake she was handling, and because their belief was that God would either save her or allow her to die, his choice, she was denied medical care by her fellow co-cultists. She died. She left several small children motherless.
A couple of years later, her husband, the minister, suffered the same fate. The children were left orphans.
Snake-handling, as it is known in the South, is illegal, yet it is part of the tenets of their religion. A few years ago the IRS, in attempting to deny tax-exempt status to certain Conservative groups had a questionnaire, one of the question on which was, “When you pray, what do you pray for?” I believe this to be a violation of the Constitution, but no one in government was called to account for it.
If tomorrow I were to declare a new “Religion.” one that worships say, lampshades, would I be entitled to the same protection as all other religions? Is religion simply what one declares it to be? Or if the basic tenets of a religion are to kill all who do not subscribe to that belief, can it be a true religion?
The Church of Scientology spent years endeavoring to obtain tax exempt status before it was successful in doing so. The IRS finally recognized it as a bonefide religion.
So my point is, and I do have one, is why can’t the IRS apply the same standards it used for the Scientologists and decide whether or not it is indeed a religion? Voo-doo isn’t. Human sacrifice isn’t. Why is rape permitted and encouraged in a true religion and should it then be declared not a religion? Does a group which advocates, no directs, killing of homosexuals a true religion, exempt from tax? It is not as clear-cut as some would think and those holding differing views should not be insulted here, unless one is the hall monitor looking for what he considers to be an infraction.
I do not consider Scientology a religion, yet the IRS does. I do not consider Islam to be a true religion. Perhaps “Religion” should be judged on whether or not it advocates harm to those not of its faith. That is an important consideration.
I have had my say. Have at it.
Frank Anderson says
Carolyne, I think you state the issues correctly and well. I suggest the important words, not word, are “protected religion”. I believe one can make a pitch or argument (successful or not) that essentially anything is a “religion”. I also think that Wellington disagrees, which is both 1) his right and 2) possibly correct, What is a “religion” and what is “protected religion” under the Constitution and UN Human Rights treaties? I don’t know; and I am not aware of any definitions from cases or other sources that answer the questions. And then Wellington correctly observes that even if something is not a religion, where does Free Speech end and ACTIONS start to make conduct illegal? “Anyone who aids, abets, counsels or acts in furtherance of a crime is equally guilty. . .” See,18 U.S.C. section 2(a), U.S. v. Dawson, 576 F.2d 656, cert den, 439 U.S. 1127. This to me may be where Islam is exposed: It aids, abets, counsels and acts in furtherance of crimes every day for 1400 years. It’s a matter of connecting the crimes with the standard, orthodox, perfect, complete, final and unchangeable teachings and nothing of which is “radical”. As long as prosecutors and police refuse to see, and proclaim following the evil taught in Islam, to be mental illness or radical misinterpretation of the clear teachings, only more death, rapes and other violence will follow. I hope you will keep musing and asking. There is an answer somewhere that will change the path we are on. Only when many of us work for the goal of changing that path will we win.
Lee Muth says
Religion, obviously, is in the “eyes” of the beholder. I don’t see any sense for the government to try and determine what is and isn’t a religion. Obviously the US government is trying VERY hard to stamp out Christianity, on the whole, by revoking their tax-exempt status. There are, obviously “cult” beliefs in every religion to some extent, e.g. the “snake” issue with that Southern so-called Christian church. As a Christian, myself, ANY facet of my faith can be blown out of proportion and deviate from basic Christian (in this case) beliefs.
Islam, in my opinion, is a religion. Albeit, the Koran and the Taqiyya, teach MANY horrible values and acts that are recommended and expected of “true believers” to do to non-believers (infidels). I have studied many of the world’s religions and I have never come across ANY other faith system/religion that promotes so much hatred and bigotry as does Islam. I feel, herein lies the crux of the issue, Islam is NOT a religion of peace, does not allow self-choice to believe or not in Islam, as does all other religions I’ve read about. As a result, Islam is a religion of “conquest” – convert or die is essentially the basic belief system behind Islam.
The issue is academic whether Islam is a religion or not, what IS OF IMPORTANCE is whether we, as US citizens, can exist alongside Islam or not. At this time, it it apparent that Western women, men and children, gays and homosexuals, and ALL non-Muslims CANNOT exist, at least according to the teachings of Muhammed, with anyone who claims to be a Muslim in good standing with the Koran.
We can debate all we want about how to look at Islam, whether its a religion or should be viewed as such by the government. All the while, we WILL be conquered by a RELIGION called Islam because “convert or die” is their mantra and has been for 1400 years and isn’t going to be stopped by a bunch of lawyers, SCOTUS, etc. The only thing that will stop us being assimilated into Islam is exactly what PaulM said about his German friends…………….violence. Even Jefferson said to Madison when he was in Paris, 1778…..”…a revolution, every once in awhile, is a good think” (poor paraphrase at best.
Unfortunately, our leaders, for some reason, think they can appease Islam and when Islam “out births us” and takes over that our leaders would be treated like the Nazi’s treated Quisling. I don’t think our leader would be allowed to live under Islam for fear they might lead a rebellion of their own. IMHO
Angela MacDonald says
Religion or not we need to stop bringing them into our country to take it over. No other group of people has decided not to assimilate and go against our constitution. When you come to my house you obey my rules! If you don’t want to then you can leave. It’s that simple. Maybe you can convince me how my rules should change. Maybe I will. But that’s for me to decide.
We need to stop letting Islamics into our country if they adhere to their law. You can’t abide by both.
In Minneapolis we had a woman shot to death by an Islamic cop for NO REASON! He took the shot from the passenger side of the squad over his partner while she was talking to his partner through the front window. It sure has been swept under the rug by the media after the first week. I don”t know what police department is doing about it and if they are going to change their hiring policies. The press is awfully quiet!
Chuck says
Don’t neglect to mention Sweden, which is now groveling at the feet of their Muslim conquerors…
Shanbarani says
This is a muslim refugee from Myanmar, he looks bengali and is a Rohingya, a so called
perscuted minority
cee says
I would love to know who is persecuting them so I can give them a pat on the back! The truth is though that the Buddhist monks were the ones being persecuted until they decided to fight back!
Anne Smith says
cee is correct. The “Rohingya” are actually Bengalis, most of them only speak Bengali or Urdu and they have never assimilated into Burma, just caused trouble and indulged in acts of terror.
The Buddhists have been quite long suffering but it seems enough is enough (to quote Sharia May).
Sons of Liberty says
PERSECUTED MINORITY ? THEY ARE THE ONES DOING ALL THE PERSECUTING IN THE WORLD . They attack Christians , Jews, unbelievers and even Muslims they deem to be APOSTATES. They are Satan’s minions unleashed on the civilized world and right now HE IS WINNING. The Father of LIES ! Right now the Marxists, progressives, and liberal dim wits are doing his bidding and if we don’t stop it here in the USA the whole world will be lost. Forget Europe , it’s OVER FOR THEM , IT’S INEVITABLE. The USA must be were we make a STAND . Muhammad had a dream from Allah / SATAN , that he saw the East of the East and the West of the West and ISLAM RULED ALL THAT I SAW.
gravenimage says
Sons of Liberty, Shanbarani said “so called persecuted minority”.
Ernie says
Sons of Liberty ; Forget Europe …………. ????!!!!! We are not finished yet ! This defaitist attitude is exactly what WE DON’T NEED .
geeknerd says
Sharia law against homosexuality only targets the willing recipient of anal sex as a homosexual; the pitcher is not considered homosexual, only the willing catcher. If the catcher is unwilling, he’s not condemned by sharia. So, when this punk gets raped in prison, he won’t be violating sharia. At least, not until he starts to like it.
abad says
Deport this Rohingya Moslem back to Bangladesh. They do NOT belong in the United States of America.
cee says
I agree abad…
brane pilot says
Social science departments of prestigious US and European universities have been awash in Saudi money for decades.
The Saudi investment is now bearing fruit as an entire generation of political leaders and young, white useful idiots are too indoctrinated to see the consequences of the Saudi-blessed PC machinery grinding this country into dust. G Soros is simply in charge of the military wing of this operation.
Once you have the minds of the young, everything else will simply fall into place.
Wellington says
Much truth in what you wrote. Will still, however, be lost on way too many.
And on a very specific point, Saudi Arabia is not a country. Rather, it is a family masquerading as a country. This too will be lost on many.
Sons of Liberty says
Exactly , brane pilot . Jesus said ” a BAD TREE cannot bear GOOD FRUIT ” . We are definitely seeing that today . I read an article about how much money the Saudi’s have given to Harvard and other Ivy League schools. There was even speculation that they paid Obama’s ,er Barry Soetero’s way through school . Well they sure got a deal on him , that Muslim has done more to DAMAGE the United States than anyone.
Tricky Dick says
Is it any wonder why Myanmar is forcing these savages out of their country. Shame on you fox news for crying about it.
NHConstitutionalist says
Religion of peace, in a pigs ass. It’s a savage satanic cult created by a perverted pedophile, self proclaimed prophet to control the ignorant masses. A political ideology controlled by archaic barbarians who exist as they did 1380 years ago. They don’t belong anywhere but the hell hole they came from, should be deported, and take their text of hate, tiquiah law, no go zones, and squalor with them. They have no respect for our country, our people, or our,,laws,and I have no respect or tolerance for them.
But before that waste product is deported, give him something to remember those innocent children by; castration. It’s vile (men?) like him who violate women and children by mutilation, degradation humiliation, subjugation, disfigurement and rape and murder. And how are honor killings possible when they lack all honor and decency? Get out you depraved filthy cretin, Go fornicate with a goat in the sands of ancestors.
Sons of Liberty says
AMEN !
Subroto Bhattacharya says
Burmese Muslim? You mean one of those poor innocent Rohingyas who those warlike Buddhists are genociding right now?
Oh noes.
chuckie says
islam is islam…….hey liook, spellcheck says i should CAPITALIZE it, but i refuse……and when i write KORAN they will tell me i’m spelling it wrong…….meanwhile, this shit continues to happen all across the country, and like that poor little girl whose family was vilified for thinking something should be done about a bunch of mooslims assaulting their daughter…….we all get bullied into silence for noticing the problem…..
no more muslims, no more problems……islam is why we have the united states navy…..oh lookit….united states navy does not have to be capitalized, but islam absolutely MUST be capitalized…..when they have burrowed THIS DEEP into our communications and culture…..WE HAVE A PROBLEM…..
islam needs to be eradicated from our nation, root and branch……it is totally against all the precepts of our Constitution, and totally committed to the destruction of those precepts……if we STOP LETTING THEM IN, we can, perhaps, reconstruct our sovereign nation……otherwise, you can all kowtow to sharia law…..i’m out of here, since i’m old and sick and subject to obamacare……..some of you who have kids, might want to do something about this crap……..
well, i do have kids…..one of them has a brain…..the other one used to have a brain, but then he went to college…..sigh….neither has offspring, and getting nearer and nearer to their forties……
they were the triumphal achievement of my life, were my boys…..and apparently, they are genetic dead ends….
doomed……we are doomed…….
RCH says
Refugee from Myanmar… the great peaceful Rohyingyas…. Need one say anything anymore!!!
Infidel says
India calls Pakistan as Terroristan at the UN… MUST WATCH
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/india-slams-pakistan-at-un-calls-it-terroristan/articleshow/60789448.cms
YorkshireKufir says
If he is typical of what Rohinga muslims have to offer a country he now inhabits i can see my Burma/Myanmar is doing something likened to ethnic cleansing, apparently with good reason. Way to go Mohammod! Show us what you are really like.
Wakeup says
After he does his time will he be thrown out of the country?
FX MEANEY says
How did a Rohingya from the other side of the globe get to New Hampshire? They seem to be the most degenerate of all Muslim sects, they never left the 7th Century.
Mike says
Send all these potential abusers a clear message: give them all a fair, fast trial followed by a first class hanging and determine a method that will make them all aware of what happens when they lay a finger on our mother’s and sisters. Then again, that’s just me being gentle. Again I ask…whats it going to take America, to wake you up? This is OUR country…OUR laws and OUR culture. We elect the thieves and scum that make laws allowing sub humans into our front yards. Maynenthere should be two hangings…the offender and a law maker!
Mike says
Send all these potential abusers a clear message: give them all a fair, fast trial followed by a first class hanging and determine a method that will make them all aware of what happens when they lay a finger on our mother’s and sisters. Then again, that’s just me being gentle. Again I ask…whats it going to take America, to wake you up? This is OUR country…OUR laws and OUR culture. We elect the thieves and scum that make laws allowing sub humans into our front yards. Maybe there should be two hangings…the offender and a law maker!
Chuck says
Old country boys say it is ok to take justice in their own hands
Frank Anderson says
Chuck, I suggest that going outside the law is a waste of a good man because another man is evil. There is to me no sense in giving evil any claim against good people. They (the evil) deserve anything they get. But not at the price of sacrifice of good people. Let evil do the sacrificing and in the process show their evil.
“Circumscribe and keep me in due bounds. . .”
Proud Anti-Islam says
He truly needs to be deported out of USA, PERMANENTLY!!!!
Frank Anderson says
PAI, if he is still alive and free elsewhere, he is also free to repeat, either where he is or here. According to every study and seminar I have attended, child molesters and abusers ALWAYS repeat if given any opportunity. What alternatives to deportation would keep him from repeating?
D3F1ANT says
A MUSLIM rapist? NO WAY! I don’t believe it!
Just kidding! The world is getting to know these people. I’d be more surprised to hear he rescued a rape victim!