My latest over at the Geller Report:
The Prime Minister of the Czech Republic, Bohuslav Sobotka, has dared to buck the zeitgeist, saying: “When we see problems in other European countries, we do not want Muslims in the Czech Republic.” This will no doubt lead to his being excoriated as a racist, bigoted “Islamophobe” by all the usual suspects, but it’s worth considering: how exactly is what Sobotka said wrong or unreasonable? How is mass Muslim migration enriching Europe?
While no doubt some of the Muslim refugees who have recently entered Europe are grateful for the hospitality they have been shown, others clearly aren’t. All of the Islamic jihadis who murdered 130 people in Paris in a series of jihad attacks in November 2015 were refugees who had recently been welcomed into Europe. Germany’s domestic intelligence agency admitted in July 2017 that hundreds of jihadis had entered the country among the refugees, and that 24,000 jihadis were active in Germany.
Muslim migrants in Europe have also been responsible for an appalling epidemic of rape, sexual assault, theft, petty crime, and looting. In the first half of 2016, migrants in Germany, who are overwhelmingly Muslim, committed 142,500 crimes, an average of 780 every day. This was a significant increase from 2015, during which migrants committed 200,000 crimes.
On New Year’s Eve, December 31, 2015, Muslim migrants committed as many as 2,000 mass rapes and sexual assaults in Cologne, Stockholm, and other major European cities. Such assaults weren’t limited to that day alone; Sweden has been called the “rape capital of the world,” because of the notorious activities of Muslim migrants. Muslim migrants have made Malmö, once a peaceful city, crime-ridden and hazardous.
In Sweden, Muslim migrants from Afghanistan are 79 times more likely to commit rape and other sexual crimes than native Swedes. Migrants and refugees commit 92 percent of rapes in Sweden. Rapists in Sweden come from Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia, Eritrea, Syria, Gambia, Iran, Palestine, Chile and Kosovo, in that order; rapists of Swedish background do not exist in sufficient numbers to make the top ten, and all the nations on that list except Chile and Eritrea are majority Muslim.
Even before the migrant influx, while on a speaking tour in Germany in 2011 I was told by the sixteen-year-old daughter of one of the event organizers that she was routinely harassed on the way to school: Muslims on the commuter trains would call her a “whore” and a “slut” because her hair and arms were not covered. This happened, she said, every day.
And in the British town of Rotherham, Muslim gangs brutalized, sexually assaulted, and raped over 1,400 young British girls, while authorities remained extremely reluctant to say or do anything in response, for fear of being labeled “racist.”
Yet hardly anything is being said about this. In the summer of 2016, Krystyna Pawłowicz, a member of the Polish parliament, charged German authorities with attempting to “cover up the crimes of their Arab guests, or even shift the blame upon themselves.” There was also evidence that migrant crimes were being covered up in the Netherlands and Sweden as well.
These cover-ups apparently proceeded from a fear that non-Muslims would begin to have negative views of Islam. Yet the sexual assaults did have to do with Islam. The Qur’an dictates that a Muslim man may have sexual relations with the “captives of the right hand,” that is, captured non-Muslim women (4:3; 4:24; 23:1-6; 33:50; 70:30). The Qur’an also says that women should veil themselves so that they may not be molested (33:59), with the implication being that if they are not veiled, they may indeed be molested.
The Qur’an provides an Islamic justification for these mass rapes and assaults that has never been discussed in the establishment media, or at any governmental level in any country. Such a discussion could have important implications for how to persuade the migrants to stop behaving in this manner, and how easy it will be to do so, but this discussion cannot be had: it’s “Islamophobic.” Feminists have been completely indifferent, even though what women face in Europe is far more serious than the plight of women in the U.S. today. Fear of being labeled an “Islamophobe” apparently trumps even feminism’s core concerns.
Because of mass Muslim migration, Europe today is more squalid, dangerous, and politically precarious than it has been since the run-up to World War II. So how exactly is Bohuslav Sobotka “racist” or “bigoted” for not wanting this situation to be replicated in his own country? And when are authorities in France, Germany, Sweden, and Britain going to make even the slightest effort to protect their people from the civil strife and bloodshed that is certain to come because of their feckless policies?
Winston says
The media should discuss these matters. There is no such thing as a religiophobia. If there were we would long ago have had words like christophobia, judeophobia, buddahphobia, hinduphobia, krishnaphobia, shintophobia, etc. appearing in our dictionaries and encyclopedias.
FYI says
Angela Merkel and Jean Claude Juncker should know why.
[They are both Coudenhove-Kalergi prizemedal winners.That’ll explain a lot!}
Due to falling birth rates in the EU they might say that mass immigration into the EU from islamic countries is necessary to provide workers{in reality.serfs for the elite masters}…
This C-K policy is a replacement plan.The East Europeans are beginning to see through this phoney Merkel policy.Merkel,Macron etc couldn’t care less about maintaining Europe’s Cultural heritage or social cohesion.Once upon a time German cities were safe.Not anymore.
Santa Voorhees says
“Due to falling birth rates in the EU they might say that mass immigration into the EU from islamic countries is necessary to provide workers”
This is what I don’t understand. First off, why don’t governments encourage the local population to have more children instead of immediately rely on mass immigration?
Second…. and I think more importantly, why MUSLIM immigration? Why is this continuing after all the trouble it caused, after the repeated attacks, rapes etc…?
Can’t the governments just take someone else, like I don’t know… japanese or chinese people? I am pretty they (and frankly, everybody else) would have caused little to no trouble and we can still be multicultural, as leftists wish.
The only reason that comes to my mind is that they want us to be a minority in our own nations. But even then the plan can be carried out with other peaceful races than Islam (yes, Islam is a race… according to the Left, that is). And frankly, I wouldn’t even mind. For example, if my Italy, say, goes 50% buddhist, I won’t mind because I know buddhists are peaceful people and won’t kill me for simply being non-buddhist…. would they? Fact is, that I never saw or heard a buddhist run over people with trucks, blowing up historical monuments or children at a pop concert, stabbing random people or rape women on a massive scale.
If Italy instead goes 50% islamic, that would be a bloody mess… judging how muslims are behaving in Sweden, UK etc… where now the muslim population is just 5-10%, or around that. (And that is exactly why buddhists have had enough and are killing muslims in Myanmar!)
Of course, I am not advocating that Italy should become 50% buddhist, but the point is that it would be much better than a 50% islamic Italy or any other nation.
Santa Voorhees says
Also, I forgot to mention, most muslims are on welfare. They do not even work…
Santa Voorhees says
Indeed… and remember, leftists had the nerve to say that we should celebrate this!
Europe is for Europeans, Asia is for Asians… and I guess stupidity is for leftists.
gravenimage says
Yes–bringing in Muslims as workers makes no sense, since so many of them refuse to work.
And even if they did work, the costs from their crime and waging violent Jihad would negate any gains.
And the economic fallout is, of course, the least of it…
Bob says
Yes, they see welfare payments as the jitza that the infidel owes to the mucklim, and their leaders in the mosques encourage them to claim as much as they can, and certainly not to work!
Michael Copeland says
Alas, Santa Voorhees, big trouble begins well before 50%: probably 15%.
Santa Voorhees says
Michael, that is also true. Just look no further than the UK, where muslims are 5% of the population.
I heard also that the italian city of Genoa has been put under heavy surveillance. All of this wouldn’t be necessary if we hadn’t muslims in to begin with.
mortimer says
There is certainly a conspiracy with regard to SNEAKING huge numbers of Muslims into Western countries without the consent of the voters.
Who is behind it? What do these shadow-rulers want from mass Muslim migration? Why are they able to overrule the voters?
Eagle Nest says
How do we get this message to the President Trump? How do we get the congress to understand the English that expresses this question? How do we get the American people on the same page. We are all tired of this Obama initiative. The American people need to get rid of the obstructionist in Congress. Clean out the ninth district court. and the swamp in congress.
maghan says
Reasons: To save a capitalism that relies on population growth for economic growth, and to tout to the world–“we are not ” racist” and intolerant”.
gravenimage says
Islam *hates* capitalism and free trade.
Richard Paulsen says
Probably the Barcelona agreement of 1995. Acceptance of muslim invasion. Oil dependent. Arabstates using.
JAR says
Thanks for that reference, Richard. I had not heard of the Barca Declaration.
http://ufmsecretariat.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Declaraci%C3%B3n-de-Barcelona-1995.pdf
If part of the the globalists’ plan was indeed to ensure the peace, stability, and security of the Mediterranean region, they have failed in an epic way.
Obviously there can arise all sorts of conspiracy theories here of *why* this all is happening.
For their part, devout Muslims see this as taking lands that will become Islamic through immigration efforts. Or, retaking the lands that once were theirs and lost.
Also European leaders will claim, “We need more workers!”
In 1991 the plan for conquest had been made explicit for across the pond, as we learned here:
https://clarionproject.org/muslim_brotherhood_explanatory_memorandum/
As time passes, Robert will be able to write more and more analytical pieces to show the trajectory of Islamic incursion. It would be nice if more people woke up to what’s going on. To see eventually where we’re headed, we can observe any of a host of Islamic majority countries. It may not get quite that far where we’re at…but along the way, the deterioration of freedom will be catastrophic (it already is in many places) for all freedom-loving citizens that voted in dhimmi rulers. “Keep quiet and everything will be okay” is not, as we learned on 9/11, not a useful response to the situation.
Michael Copeland says
Special message for shepherds –
Wake …..the flock…….up
Lydia says
“Keep calm and carry on” progress report: NOT WORKING!!!
Richard Paulsen says
Thank you. You are welcome.
gravenimage says
The US and Canada are more productive than ever in extracting oil.
vyx says
Lots of interesting facts.
However, the article did not answer the question of why, which was posted in the title.
Of course, the subtext says the purpose is to bring rape and crime to Europe.
Which brings us to the original question: why?
As for theories of “replacement birth rate,” how are workers that do not speak the language and do not want to work EVER going to contribute to society? How re people on welfare for the rest of their lives going to contribute to the pension money that Hans has been promised?
And why are they not “importing” non-violent Buddhists, Christians and Sikhs? Only Muslims?
More questions than answers.
Jack Diamond says
Why, from the European side goes back to the governmental and institutional alliances between Europe and the Arab League, meticulously documented in Bat Ye’or’s “Eurabia” and other works. Eurabia is the short answer.
Why, from the Muslim side is the obligation of both jihad and hijrah (migration), with Western Europe (and Muhammad’s promised conquest of Rome) the great prize and seemingly within reach of the coming generations. Rape and crime are just a bonus and help instill a “frame of mind”.
Hijrah migration is a communal enterprise, modeled after the first, Muhammad’s to Yathrib, which when conquered became Medina and the first Islamic state. Islam otherwise clearly forbids Muslims from living solitary in the lands of the disbelievers (Muhammad: “I am innocent or free of any Muslim that lives among the Pagans and non-Muslims” Abu Daw’uad Hadith 2645), in keeping with the doctrine of Loyalty & Enmity and separation. At the same time migration is ordered (‘O people, immigrate, holding on to Islam, for Hijra is to continue as long as jihad continues” kenz al Umal 46260). This migration is communal and sanction by Islam.
“In equating jihad with immigration, it makes immigration a stepping stone for greater goals, particularly the transforming the existing community into an Islamic one. Transforming an existing community means having it Islamized.
“The primary goal of the Hijra (Islamic migration) is the establishment of an Islamic state. This is achieved through da’wa (to call to Islam)… Da’wa is both religious and political as there is no separation between sacred and secular, between state and religion in Islam…the spreading of Islam is not simply a missionary activity like that of a church but the establishment of a community that would rise up as the soldiers of Allah to establish an Islamic state.
“The Islamic confession and its declaration ultimately state that the suzerainty of this world and all its governments belongs to Allah and his messenger Muhammad…all other legislations are manmade, and as such they are to be disregarded as kufr, or unbelief and apostasy…because of this the primary goal of the Islamic migration or Hijra is considered to be by Muslim scholars from a religious and jurisprudence point of view as the vanguard, the preamble and prelude to jihad, for the establishment of an Islamic state. ”
——Sam Solomon “Modern Day Trojan Horse, the Islamic Doctrine of Immigration”
dumbledoresarmy says
Yes.
I have read that book. Need to re-read it.
And… *every* politician, incumbent or aspiring, who has shown *any* sign of awareness of something being problematic about Islam and Muslims, needs to be given a copy. Bookmarked and highlighted.
It needs to be translated into French, German, Italian. And Spanish… for the benefit – and warning! – of countries in Latin America. And Russian. And… Hindi! (and numbers of other regional languages in India). And into some of the main languages in certain currently-majoriy-Infidel African nations. Any non-PC politico needs to know what’s int hat book.. and craft their nation’s defence-and-immigration policies accordingly, whether to stop the Hijra getting going *or* .. if it’s already insidiously at work… to first halt, and then *reverse* it.
Why not send a copy to PM Modi, of India?
Jack Diamond says
Great idea. In case people don’t know “Sam Solomon” is one of the highest ranked “defectors” ever to leave Islam. He was a professor of Shari’a law for fifteen years.
In case you have never seen Sam on You Tube, this is the first part of a memorable 3-part talk he gives on Islam and Christianity.
maghan says
One reason: a whole lot business with Arabs from Arabia, etc. The West buys oil from Arabia, Kuwait, Iraq, etc. and sells them expensive arms and other baubles of capitalist production.
In the eyes of the corrupt and hypocritical politicians–the gains from this business decision far outweigh any number of rapes, murders, and other crimes.
ItsReallyQuiteClear says
According to Zeit Online, referring to events beginning on Friday, September 4, 2015:
“Today, almost one year later, the government admits that not a single refugee who arrived on that weekend or in the days that followed was screened by security officials.”
On page 5, the article both provides the a figure of 17,500 immigrants entering Germany during that weekend and states that “[t]he Federal Police isn’t providing any reliable figures and no information is coming from the federal government.” So the only thing that is true is that no one knows how many immigrants arrived, how many of them were refugees, where they came from, or what their intents — at their time of arrival — was. And no one knows what their current intents are.
But of the Muslim immigrants, we know what their religion commands them to do, and to whom they are commanded to do it.
Source: http://www.zeit.de/gesellschaft/2016-08/refugees-open-border-policy-september-2015-angela-merkel
davej says
My theory is that Corporations are scared to death of a shrinking population base. Capitalism is based on selling more houses, cars and cellphones every year and this requires a steady supply of consumers. Corporations sponsor political parties and thereby influence governmental policies.
Muslims are particularly attractive as immigrants because they are fecund. It’s all about the bottom line with no consideration of the social good or, in this case, evil. They will still consume even if on the dole, with welfare benefits paid for by taxation. It really is that simple.
ItsReallyQuiteClear says
davej,
That’s an interesting theory. So, the corporations lobby for, and/or fund government policies to increase (or allow) immigration in order to become, in effect government contractors for food, clothing, household goods, etc., as opposed to being reliant upon the job market and the buying power of working stiffs.
Just might work, except that I remembered an old nursery rhyme…I saw 7 Muslims going to St. Ives, each Muslim had 4 wives, each wife had 7 kids, each kid had 7 cousins (all brought over under family asylum privileges)…but when I got to St. Ives, I didn’t see 7 x 4 European couples working, and I only saw 1.1 European kids per family playing in the street. Assuming 1 child per Muslim wife per year, how many would be going to St. Ives in 5 years?
I think this perspective — and I agree with you that it seems quite plausible that it’s a factor — is another example of projecting Western thought processes onto Muslims. A Western capitalist might think “Hey, government welfare will essentially guarantee my revenue stream”, while the Muslims might think “I must have as many kids as possible to serve the Quran’s supremacist objectives — and government welfare makes many kids possible. But I also must destroy the Western economy, so I’ll sue those companies, I’ll burn their stores and I’ll break their windows. Then I’ll sue the government for not providing goods and services in the (non-existent[sic]) Muslim no-go zones.”
The Muslims not only don’t play by our rules, they’re not even playing the same game. Which makes it anything but a game.
Michael Copeland says
As I was going to St. Ives
I met a man with seven wives,
Followed, too, by seven ex-wives.
Each wife had seven kids,
All were living on benefits.
Wives, ex-wives, kids and man,
How much gold must taxpayers pan?
ItsReallyQuiteClear says
As much as possible, no doubt. As long as it’s Shari’ah-compliant gold (http://shariahgold.com/), of course…
maghan says
One of Feminism’s akemain arguments is that females should just be like men in terms of life plans and male privileges–as the feminists see it.
Thus, a childless female CEO with a Ph.D. is much more admired that a female part-time worker raising 3 children. This feminist program is also fueled by their slogan of ” a woman’s right to choose” which fully supports abortion on demand and late-term abortion.
In the Muslim world, the more children a locked away and covered-up female has is seen in very positive terms. By contrast, females who brook that role are to be despised.
dumbledoresarmy says
So what’s your answer?
Compel all non-Islamic women into the same forced-breeding role as Muslim females?
Lower the age of consent to … nine? ten? twelve? remove the female franchise, deny women an education, and reinstate forced marriage of barely-pubescent girl-children, and then .. turn women into broodmares? Beat the Mohamedans… but… by playing their soul-destroying game?
Surely there are better ways of winning this, than… turning the free Infidel world into a ghastly mirror-image of the dar al Islam, where, to be blunt, a woman is ‘c*nt’ and ’tilth’… and lives under a temporarily-suspended sentence of death that may at any moment be randomly activated by any or all of the men who surround her.
gravenimage says
I’m afraid the idea that most Muslims–many of whom are uneducated and speak no English, French, or German–would make good high-level corporate employees is *very* questionable.
And never mind that pious Muslims consider Capitalism and even just productive labor to be un-Islamic.
vyx says
I’m not sure if I understand the logic behind the consumerism argument.
If you want to increase “buying power” you need people who buy.
How are most able to afford to make purchases?
They work.
Then use that money for purchases.
However… muslims don’t work. The government will never make them work.
They get government benefits.
They use government benefits to pay for the things they buy.
Is muslim immigration really a disguise for “corporate welfare?”
In other words… instead of governments directly giving tax breaks, instead they give muslims money, and then they give that money to companies?
When they get into the economic death spiral of more people receiving benefits in relation to those working, then what will they do? Just print more Euros and tax the natives (not the muslims)
until they leave the country?
Or will they make it illegal for people to move out of Europe?
davej says
From the Corporate point of view the immigrants don’t need to work, they just need to consume – which they certainly will. Maybe not much bacon or books but houses, cars, and especially diapers for sure.
It is an unfortunate combination of Islamic invasive ambitions and Corporations needing more customers. Yes it is shortsighted and unsustainable but Capitalism has a very limited forward perspective – next year’s profit statement.
davej says
Also note who owns the mass Media and the social media sites that tell you that Islam is a religion of peace and Muslims are victims of “Islamophobia”. Yep, the same Corporations that sell diapers and detergents.
maghan says
Lenin’s quip: a capitalist will sell you the rope that he knows that you are going to hang him with.
gravenimage says
Robert Spencer: What’s the Point of Mass Muslim Migration?
…………………….
It is, overall, and invasion–and not a peaceful one.
Michael Copeland says
“We shall conquer their countries whether they like it or not.”
Sheikh Muhammad Ayed, Al Aqsa mosque, Jerusalem
“They’re not refugees. This is an invasion. They want to take over.”
Bishop Laszlo Kiss-Rigo, Hungary
https://libertygb.org.uk/news/great-islamic-invasion-2015
gravenimage says
Salient quotes, Michael.
John A. Marre says
The point is to turn European countries Muslim. I see what is happening. I see that Obama went to Europe and lavished praise and gifts on heads of state who are bringing Muslims in: Renzi, Merkel, Francis, Hollande.
The “Migration” is males of the age when they form families. They arrived without their women, to get settled, to assure that the money is flowing to them from the sucker Europeans. Once they are in a stable situation, they will send for their 1-4 wives and will get seriously down to the task of turning Europe Muslim.
Less than 4 years for the UK. 6 for Sweden. Possibly 10 for France and Germany. 20 for Italy. (The pope has already gone over to the other side.)
Andy says
What’s the Point of Mass Muslim Migration? Good Question.
I personally don’t see any benefit or point in bringing Muslims in any high number into our western societies and I think a lot of readers would agree.
IF Muslims would have been really peace loving and adaptable to change to become part of the host nation.
Then,
I think most people wouldn’t mind Muslims coming into there nation but this is not the case or happening for the most part and almost everyday now there is some kind of violence happening in the world, which again for the most part is perpetrated by Muslims and reported by Jihad Watch and other organizations who are following this subject matter.
Again, We were told not asked by governments when they brought Muslim refugees into there western nation. We the people of our lands had no say in the matter. Period!
Everybody here on JW will put in his or her two cents but at the end of the day nothing will change.
There are powers beyond our control who are at work here, We all know or have heard of these powers. The Deep State, Globalists, George Soros, BLM, ANTIFA etc, etc, etc,
The more so called Muslim refugees get into our western nations the more we will end up as a third world nation, We are slowly being destroyed from within by a group of people under the guise of a religion who will stop at nothing until we all conform to it.
That IT being ISLAM. SHARIA LAW OVER ALL THE WORLD!!! This is the ultimate goal.
Religious abuse. Religious abuse is abuse administered under the guise of religion, including harassment or humiliation, which may result in psychological trauma. Religious abuse may also include misuse of religion for selfish, secular, or ideological ends such as the abuse of a clerical position.
Religious abuse – Wikipedia
I heard there are safe camps set up in the middle east and I would put refugees in camps there in the middle east.
My question would be how do WE STOP the mass Muslim migration? While we still have a sliver of a chance?
Andy says
IF ISRAEL FALLS WE ALL FALL!!
We all are FREEDOM FIGHTERS!!!
Geert Wilder like Robert Spencer and a lot of others are telling the truth of what we are witnessing around the world.
Geert Wilders – Europe’s Suicide in the Face of Islam
gravenimage says
Bravo, Geert Wilders!
maghan says
Seriously, “their” or “there”–which is it?
gravenimage says
“Their, There, They’re”
http://www.elearnenglishlanguage.com/blog/english-mistakes/their-there-theyre/
abad says
The point of Moslem Mass Migration(TM Pending) is this:
Moslems want to infiltrate and destroy the western world, take i down to the third-world nation level of their own home Moslem nations.
Part of the package includes killing all non-Moslems because that is what the Quran dictates (Surahs 8:12, 9:5 et al).
Islam is a destructive force when it comes to human civilization. Islam can never be productive. Islam is based upon killing people (that daily quota I keep mentioning every now and then on JW), destroying monuments (I heard they were dancing in the streets in Syria when Antifa was busy taking down those “offensive” Confederate statues recently), and wallowing in the filth their religion teaches (Islam is the only religion that forbids the use of soap and water).
Thank God President Trump wants to keep these Ishnaqis out of my country
Anne Smith says
I thought President Trump was pretty much clued up on how the Muslims are trying to take over, particularly when he recited the “Snake” story to a huge crowd.
However, it seems that some of the people he has appointed do not seem to be on this wave length. I hope he is not going to back track on getting Muslim immigration down, but at present the signs do not look too promising.
Can anyone give a different picture?
gravenimage says
I think Trump has pretty good instincts about Jihad being bad–but he does not, alas, know much about Islam.
maghan says
So how do Muslims do ablution before prayers? Without water?
ItsReallyQuiteClear says
Why, they wash with dirt, of course:
“O you who have believed, do not approach prayer while you are intoxicated until you know what you are saying or in a state of janabah, except those passing through [a place of prayer], until you have washed [your whole body]. And if you are ill or on a journey or one of you comes from the place of relieving himself or you have contacted women and find no water, then seek clean earth and wipe over your faces and your hands [with it]. Indeed, Allah is ever Pardoning and Forgiving.”
Seems quite fitting since they’re all so keen to take a “dirt nap” for their, um, inner struggle…
https://quran.com/4/43
Michael says
Robert asks, “What’s The Point Of Muslim Mass Migration?”…..Please follow me along……Who’s strongly pushing and persuading for it?…..Obviously, Left Media, Left Academia, The Left Political Establishment, The Left Influenced Entertainment Industry and Many Corporations…….The Left has been intentionally creating conflicts for 50 years now. Conflicts regarding the male and female sexes, the races, the classes, sexual orientation minorities, law enforcement conduct. And ironically while hiding behind a mask of deception, they falsely claim is a desire for “diversity and inclusiveness.” They are instead the most divisive among us. Why? In order to create culture conflict and weaken our sovereign nations. It’s a ruthless attack on Europe, Canada, even Australia and The United States. They want to erase or revise our history, our heritage, our values, our cultures, our proven institutions, even our traditional family unit and yes, our very freedom. Their goal is a form of totalitarianism………………………And who’s behind it all? Smart Rich Leftist Elites and Smart Rich Jewish Elites. Robert is a scholar. He could easily prove my theory by simply researching the forces I mentioned above who are controlling this Great Replacement. The outcome of a list will be the Elites mentioned. There’s no possible way Western leaders could be this stupid. They’re controlled through money and power…………..Am I indicting all Leftists and all Jews. Certainly not. Many among the Left are simply “useful idiots.” And there are many fine Jews who are not Elitists.
Armand Tsanzarian says
Sobotka is a hero for saying that! It takes someone with exceptional courage to speak out, even though the problem is so very obvious.
But the massive question has still not been addressed, Why allow this? Why? Help them in north africa of course, but not in europe. We don’t want them, we don’t need them, they are scary, they are savages.
If they want to immigrate they should fill in forms, do exams etc. prove there is a need. Otherwise, stay where you are.
Lydia says
Goals of muslim trojan horse:
1. Borderless society of one world government culture promoted.
2. Multiculturalism pushed with an emphasis on religion, paving the way of the one world religion under antichrist.
3. Christian refugees left behind to be massacred, while muslim migrants are welcomed by rolling out the red carpet.
4. The culture will be merged with islam and they have their excuse to be ‘inclusive’ which in essence means to hide the crosses and advise everyone to assimilate to the new migrant muslim culture of sharia.
5. In order to survive in the new shariastan lands, the native population are encouraged to conform to the migrant culture, and via the complicity, the muslim culture conquers Europe.
6. Terrorist acts will increasingly be committed, and as a result it will strike fear in the general population, aiding in the goals of the items listed above.
7. As more terrorist acts are committed, the need to address terrorism will arise at some point, but the only reason for this is their ‘counter-terrorism’ agenda, which basically boils down to coming against anyone who is against terrorism, ironic as that might sound, and the main target is Christians.
8. This increased terrorism will also help pave the way for the one world religion compromise. The harlot church will acquiesce to this.
It’s all part of the blueprints.
Of the big plan.
davej says
The biggest advantages that Islam possesses are Devotion (to their stupid allah and all of his nasty nonsense), Patience (they have been working on their evil plans for 14 Centuries) and Deception (they are the victims, not the decent people they are blowing up).
We will be forced to act in the only language they understand – brute force – if the civilized world is to survive.
The sooner the better because right now Evil is winning.
D Austin says
Looks like Austria’s Foreign Minister, Sebastian Kurz, got the bill for all of those immigrants and isn’t happy about it. Kind of like Canada not being so welcome now that Quebec shells out $2.6 million Canadian dollars in monthly welfare for 4,000 asylum seekers.
Austrian FM Proposes Plan to Cut Migrant Benefits by One-Third
https://sputniknews.com/europe/201709041057075627-austria-election-program-migrants/
Trudeau Has Second Thoughts As Quebec Shells Out $2.6 Million In Monthly Welfare For Refugees
https://uconservative.com/2017/08/28/trudeau-second-thoughts-quebec-shells-2-6-million-monthly-welfare-refugees/
gee says
Mr Spencer, as much as I agree with your statements, they don’t go far enough.
The UK police have gone much further than merely allowing Islamofascist rape gangs to ply their crimes, they have actively aided and abetted the practice by arresting the parents of the victims when they attempt to rescue their daughters from the rapists. Yes not only have the police turned away from the victims then have aided the rapists in their kidnapping of non-Muslim girls.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/239615/uk-police-arrested-parents-trying-stop-muslims-daniel-greenfield
https://pamelageller.com/2014/09/british-police-arrested-parents-trying-rescue-daughters-islamic-rape-gangs.html/
Bob says
Yes, they see welfare payments as the jitza that the infidel owes to the mucklim, and their leaders in the mosques encourage them to claim as much as they can, and certainly not to work!