This does not mean that the British government is finally coming to its senses. All it means is that there was a large-scale campaign to get Sabri barred from entering the country, and the government was embarrassed into complying. The May government still has a long record of admitting jihad preachers and barring foes of jihad terror, and in those cases was able to get away with this because there was no large public outcry calling the government back to sanity. And so its insanity is likely to continue, and result in future bannings of foes of jihad, and future admittance of friends of jihad.
The May government has made its priorities clear: offending Muslims and Islam is far, far more serious than jihad terror or the sexual abuse of Infidel girls. To move strongly against such crimes would be “Islamophobic.” The British authorities have made their taste for jihad terrorists, and disdain for their foes, abundantly clear. While I am banned from the country for the crime of noting — correctly — that Islam has doctrines of warfare against unbelievers, Britain has a steadily lengthening record of admitting jihad preachers without a moment of hesitation. Syed Muzaffar Shah Qadri’s preaching of hatred and jihad violence was so hardline that he was banned from preaching in Pakistan, but the UK Home Office welcomed him into Britain.
The UK Home Office recently admitted Shaykh Hamza Sodagar into the country, despite the fact that he has said: “If there’s homosexual men, the punishment is one of five things. One – the easiest one maybe – chop their head off, that’s the easiest. Second – burn them to death. Third – throw ’em off a cliff. Fourth – tear down a wall on them so they die under that. Fifth – a combination of the above.”
May’s government also admitted two jihad preachers who had praised the murderer of a foe of Pakistan’s blasphemy laws. One of them was welcomed by the Archbishop of Canterbury.
Meanwhile, the UK banned three bishops from areas of Iraq and Syria where Christians are persecuted from entering the country.
“Entry Denied: Anti-Semitic Hate Preacher Barred From Visiting UK,” by Simon Kent, Breitbart, September 5, 2017:
The former Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Sheikh Ekrima Sa’id Sabri, has been barred from entering the UK as part of a delegation organised by the pro-Palestinian group EuroPal.
Sheikh Sabri is the current imam of Jerusalem’s Al-Aqsa Mosque. He has previously called for the destruction of Britain and the U.S. as well as displaying a long record of anti-Semitic hate speech. As Breitbart Jerusalem reported, he was due to be in Britain from 11 to 15 September with a visit to the Houses of Parliament on his itinerary….
In an exclusive interview with Breitbart Jerusalem’s Ali Waked last month, Sheikh Sabri declared Israel’s recent decision to remove metal detectors from the disputed Al-Aqsa Mosque site on the Temple Mount was a “victory.”…
In the past he has flatly denied the Holocaust, stating: “Six million Jews dead? No way, they were much fewer. Let’s stop with this fairy tale exploited by Israel to capture international solidarity.” He has also called for the destruction of America and Britain, adding Jews are “the most cowardly creatures Allah has ever created” and he is “filled with rage” towards them.
Tom says
When the people are angry enough to actually say something the result can be positive.
This should be a call to all those in Canada now angry at Trudeau for his idiotic open border philosophy to get up off their couch and actually do something, like sign a petition, call or write their MP or the Prime Ministers office, get involved, it’s the ONLY way to stop this madness.
underbed cat says
I think the MB already has a root growing in Canada, that is obvious when you realize how quickly Trudeau submitted, allowing the hijra mass migration to enter Canada, and the support organization were already established, the like minded people were already able to influence with authority.
underbed cat says
M-103 I believe was passed, since they don’t have laws to protect speech. Which in a way is a double sword, they are able to get their message out which the public need to know about the dangers and now any criticism is banned.
Tom says
In Canada we have protections in our Constitution for free speech and assembly. The problem has arisen because our supreme courts have said there can be restrictions placed on free speech to stop hate speech. Unfortunately this corrupt Trudeau government, controlled by Muslim Brotherhood operatives, says that any opposition to Islam is hate speech. We are in a catch 22. The only way out is to rid ourselves of this Liberal government ASAP.
mortimer says
A Canadian constitutional lawyer says that Canada’s hate speech restrictions cannot be increased because the Charter of Rights and Freedoms will prevent any further increase in restriction.
Tom says
Yes Mortimer but since when has a legal opinion ever stopped our liberal controlled supreme court from overiding our charter rights?
Remember a legal opinion is just that, an opinion. No matter how qualified the lawyer provining the opinion, the law is either shut down or legitimized by the supreme court and the liberal judges sitting there.
John Forbes says
CANADA needs to do one hell of a LOT more that just talk about the attack on all of CANADA as initiated by MUSLIM JUSTIN TRUDEAU , George Soros & His Muslim Brotherhood Colleagues in the LIBERAL PARTY !
The shutting down of Free speech should enough to spark utter RAGE but nothing so far !
The average CANADIAN is so clueless that the BROTHERHOOD is delighted !
John S. Obeda says
I live in Canada and I agree with you John. It is sad. The people are indeed clueless. God help us. God help us to do what we can do while we can do it.
Ayushman says
British people are foolish. They succeed invaded India because it was already mutilated and was suffering under the heal of Islamic agression – whose unprecedented agression and superior warfare combined with a militarized state Aryans could match. Now the British ruled India for about 200 years buy Britain never learnt what immortal race Muslims together constitute. They could not understand the warth of these Barbarians which a civilization has to face .
Here is the text of ‘The Moslem Conquest of India’ from ‘Story of Civilization’ by Will & Ariel Durant [Volume 1, Chapter 16]
The Mohammedan Conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precarious thing, whose delicate complex of order and liberty, culture and peace may at any time be overthrown by barbarians invading from without or multiplying within.
Sir Winston Churchill
Prime Minister of England
1939-1945
How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries, improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.
A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement, the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.
Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome.
INDIA HAS ITS BEAUTIFUL NATIVE CULTURE WHICH WILL HELP TRANSFORMATION OF MUSLIMS TO COME BACK TO HINDUISM . BUT BRITAIN HAS NOTHING PARALLEL TO BOST OF. RATHER ITS MATERIALISM WILL FURTHER AGGRAVATE THESE MONSTERS.
Tom says
You are absolutely correct. The quotes you provide are beacons of historical light that the world should be seeing and from which we should learn but we are not and so must repeat the mistakes of history yet again.
“Those who do not learn from history are bound to repeat it” George Santayana.
Gart says
‘He has also called for the destruction of America and Britain, adding Jews are “the most cowardly creatures Allah has ever created” and he is “filled with rage” towards them’.
So is he suggesting allah is not so great after all, or is he jealous of all those Nobel prizes?
RationalVoice says
That he should think for one moment he would be allowed in shows that he and the other maniacal Islamists take us for a bunch of soft idiots to be used an abused at will !!!
I heard that if you even have an Israeli stamp on your passport you will be refused entry to any Islamic country.Time to take a hard line Theresa !!!
Bob says
Forget the “hard line” by TM – she’s too much in love with the Ms!
Andy says
GOOD!! SLAM THE DOOR SHUT!!! and never let these humanity hating vile people back into your land!!!
Patriots start to be proud of your country and stand up and fight for it, or you are going to loose it. Don’t be afraid of little words they might (the moslems, lefties etc.etc.) call you, like RACIST!!
We heard it all before and lets not be fooled again.
Westman says
So the Home Office didn’t come to their senses; they only came to their embarrassment. Like 5 lawyers at the bottom of the ocean, it’s a pittance start.
Sa’id means happy – does that face and its words seem happy or does it look and sound more like it’s “filled with rage” towards Jews?
It will be interesting to see what backlash comes from banning the Imam of the mosque of Islam’s third “holiest” site.
underbed cat says
M-103 I believe was passed, since they don’t have laws to protect free speech. Which in a way is a double sword, they are able to get their message out to convert which is suppose to be peaceful but is partly a fib, but the public now cannot be told the truth of sharia, of jihad of the mind, to know about the dangers and now the controversial doctrine discussion is banned.
mortimer says
UC, M-103 is a ‘motion’ passed in the Parliament of Canada to establish a committee to study how to SILENCE ALL OPPOSITION TO ISLAM and impose SHARIA BLASPHEMY LAW.
There is considerable opposition to it in Canada … about 70% opposed. It will be crushed.
underbed cat says
Thanks Mortimer, I read “passed in Parliament” of Canada, immediately thought it had been passed, I am clueless when it comes to governmental processes, passing laws in the U.S. and Canada. That is good news, but why would they have to study how to “silence”, if they did not intend to actually “silence”, I hope this potential law gets the boot. I hope they don’t fall for it, since Trudeau appears to have bent his knee.
In the U.S., when I read that some states or areas acknowledge or use sharia, I wonder how that can be done. I think any state or federal judge who gets cozy with the idea should be removed. The only protection against the deception and civilization jihad, is to read the Quran…and sharia to see how Islam as a doctrine describes how to control and deceive the mind by outward peaceful behavior then uses terror to reinforce it their harsh control.
underbed cat says
Banning a Grand Mufti a scholarly expert on Islam, from entering Britain who calls for your countries demise and will spread the dangerous doctrine to create islamic citizens. to replace Britain, is a very smart, although very late, acknowledgement of the danger.
underbed cat says
This entire article should be copied and sent to May government she need this entire picture about what is being said.
Jayell says
May, like the rest of the self-styled/self-serving ‘political elite’ exist in their own little egocentric bubble. The only ‘entire picture’ that they ever see in their minds is what they see in their rose-tinted mirrors. So this article would probably end up in the bin.
mortimer says
OH, NOW I GET IT: Shaykh Hamza Sodagar wants to hurt and slay UK POLITICIANS!
If he merely spoke about oppressing WOMEN and LITTLE GIRLS, he would be allowed into the UK.
The politicians excluded him for the sake of PROTECTING POLITICIANS, rather than DOING THEIR JOB of PROTECTING THE VULNERABLE LITTLE GIRLS in UK society.
Self-serving, then, isn’t it?
Politicianaphobia says
An interesting read from a NDP member of parliament in Canada on what Canadians should think. Manitoulin West Recorder: House Call with Carol Hughes.
Politicianaphobia says
No mention of the number of Muslim groups active in Canada, shhhhhhh
Jack Holan says
Who knows perhaps Ms May’s Political Advisors recommended that she take this action for Jewish Vote. If I were British and it were her Corbyn and some other freak I’d stay home I wouldn’t vote for someone dragging the country down to surrender apologetic for what I don’t know and submitting to a cruel and Evil system Sharia that Brits won’t be able to object to without possible Hate Crimes being charged.
pumbar says
When I read the first Jihadwatch blog piece excoriating H.M Govt for allowing this lunatic entry into the UK, which was posted only the other day, I thought it odd that the article quoted was saying that the entry visa was still being processed.
It was only when I saw this new post and thought, “hang on”; that I noticed the previous post seems to have been deleted and has disappeared.
Odd.
gravenimage says
UK government reverses itself, bans Muslim cleric who called for destruction of Britain from entering country
……………………
Better than nothing…
Peter Clemerson says
Robert says “there was a large-scale campaign to get Sabri barred from entering the country, and the government was embarrassed into complying”
Can Robert, or anyone else, say who mounted this campaign?
pumbar says
Christians United For Israel managed to garner 18,143 signatures for its petition against the loathsome Sabri entering the UK (https://www.change.org/o/christians_united_for_israel_uk). It seems as though the entry visa had not been granted at any point prior to this decision, so nothing had been ‘overturned’ or ‘reversed’.
There is a statement by CUFI here;
http://www.cufi.org.uk/uncategorized/press-release-islamic-extremist-sheikh-denied-entry-to-the-uk/
It would seem Europol claims that the involvement of CUFI had no impact on the decision of the Home Office to bar the nutcase preacher.
Peter Clemerson says
To Pumbar
Thank you for your prompt reply.
pumbar says
No worries.
gravenimage says
Thank you for the information, Pumbar.
Anne Smith says
Well it seems as if the worms are finally turning – I have sensed throughout the country a revulsion at the way our present Government bends supinely to the will of the Muslim minority.
However, the political elite are fighting back. Last night the BBC was almost beside itself with suppressed glee as the News broadcast – in great ans sustained detail – the shocking revelation that four serving soldiers were actually members of a banned right wing organisation.
This was headline news!!!! They hadn’t murdered, stabbed, run over, threatened anyone, just were or had been members of an anti-immigrant organisation which I do not think has actually committed a crime against anyone, but is nevertheless banned.
One of the reporters did actually say they hadn’t been charged with any offence, but the overriding impression given was that this was just a formality and would soon be sorted.
The BBC becomes ever more Marxist and unfortunately a large proportion of the population still regard it as it used to be, an impartial conveyor of news. That has not been true for many years.