Shabir Ahmed was leader of a Muslim rape gang; he blamed his conviction on an anti-Muslim conspiracy.
He viciously assaulted James Palmer for saying “terrorists” should be eradicated, even though Palmer didn’t mention Muslims. Ahmed, that racist, bigoted “Islamophobe,” assumed that Palmer was referring to Muslims when he referred to “terrorists.”
Even after the assault, Palmer was anxious to affirm his continued adherence to politically correct fictions: “There’s no denying he took umbrage. I never mentioned Muslims. I said bombers not Muslims. I said Muslims don’t plant bombs do they? And he agreed. That still stands by the way.”
“Prisoner accused of stamping on inmate’s face following row about terror attacks,” by John Scheerhout, Manchester Evening News, September 18, 2017 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):
A prisoner punched another inmate to the ground and then stamped on his face following a row about the Brussels terror attacks, a court heard.
Shabir Ahmed, 64, from Oldham, attacked a 71-year-old fellow inmate at Wakefield prison who had suggested ‘terrorists should be eradicated’ on the day news broke about the outrage in Belgium, a jury was told.
The defendant confronted the elderly inmate and threatened to kill him ‘if you slag off Muslims again’.
The court heard that the defendant later floored the elderly prisoner, sending his false teeth flying, before stamping a number of times on his face and head….
The prosecutor described how Mr Ahmed took exception to comments being made by Mr Palmer at around 8.30am on Tuesday March 22 last year as he was walking with other prisoners to work.
Mr Palmer was discussing the recent Brussels terror attacks with a fellow inmate before suggesting that ‘terrorists should be killed’, said Mr Adlington.
He continued: “The defendant walking in front of him turned around and challenged Mr Palmer about his comments. There was an exchange of words, with the defendant telling Mr Palmer that if you slag off Muslims again he would kill him.”
Mr Palmer headed off to his workplace but when he was returning to his cell the defendant punched him to the face, causing him to fall to the ground, the jurors were told.
He was unaware of what happened after that although two eye witnesses saw Mr Ahmed raise his right foot and stamp on Mr Palmer’s head ‘a number of times’ before being pulled off by other prisoners, according to the prosecution.
Mr Ahmed then walked away, Mr Adlington told the jury.
Mr Palmer was taken to the prison’s healthcare department where he spent a few days being treated for a ‘bust nose’, a cut lip and abrasions to his head, the court heard.
He felt ‘light headed and dizzy’ for some time after alleged attack, the jurors were told….
“I was shocked and horrified again. I said these bombers have got to be eradicated,” he said.
He described how the defendant told him: “You effing insult Muslims again I will effing kill you. I then added Muslims don’t plant bombs do they? He was taken aback by that and said no. I said ‘there you are don’t go getting excited’.”
He described ‘two or three others’ who were friends of the defendant also ‘wanted to get on the issue’.
“I told them, you know, to shove off,” said Mr Palmer.
About three hours later, as he returned to his cell after working Mr Palmer described ‘two figures and fists coming flying at me’.
He said he blocked one blow but was hit in the head by another, sending him to the ground where he hit his head ‘very hard’.
He recalled being ‘kicked and stamped on’.
Under cross-examination, Mr Palmer said he could not defend himself as he was recovering from food poisoning and a chest infection at the time while ordinarily he was ‘perfectly capable of looking after myself’.
Being questioned by John Kennerley, for Mr Ahmed, he strenuously denied he had talked about eradicating Muslims, saying he had used the word eradicate ‘just like President Trump’.
The defendant was a ‘troublemaker’ who was ‘putting a twist on it’.
“There’s no denying he took umbrage. I never mentioned Muslims. I said bombers not Muslims. I said Muslims don’t plant bombs do they? And he agreed. That still stands by the way,” said Mr Palmer, who said he had many Muslim friends….
Guy Macher says
Why are Muslim prisoners the size of market hogs?
Ray Sears says
FREE FOOD !
Saipan Sam says
perfect analogy
Jayell says
Because the UK prison authorities give them 5-star cordon-noir exclusive halal cuisine along with all the other preferential treatment that they get. (PS – you can’t say ‘cordon-bleu’ with this lot because it doesn’t go with the IS flag – and it sounds too civilised).
Anne Smith says
Superior prison rations, known as halal.
Ask the Duke of Marlborough.
Skeptic Sam says
It’s the fecal tainted halal food that is so nourishing.
Timothy Micheal McAlee, Sr. G.eD. says
These Muslim fanatics believe that “allah” will reward them with 72 Virgins & they could Not be more Wrong! Mohammad was a Dyslexic & misinterpreted the Quran! It says,”with 27 Virgins will I reward You,BUTT YOU won’t know if they are Male or female, until You get here SUCKERS”!!!
Guest says
England needs to bring back the death penalty
Benedict says
That’s exactly what England has done by admitting Muslims to the country.
Michael says
I agree. Persuading to Islam or imposing Islam should attract the same death penalty as heresy did during the Middle Ages.
mortimer says
NO CRITICISM OF ISLAM WILL BE TOLERATED UNDER SHARIA LAW… you dirty kafir ‘HARBI’ !
Sharia law permits the murder of a kafir at war (harbi) with Islam by MUSLIM VIGILANTES:
Sharia permits the murder of anyone who verbally opposes Islam, since they are AT WAR (harbi) with Islam:
“There is no indemnity obligatory for killing a non-Muslim (harbi) at war with Muslims.” -Reliance of the Traveller, o4.17, p.593
Sharia law is the reason why Muslim vigilantes kill, not because they are lacking in self-restraint. The opposite! Muslims murder blasphemers out of a sober sense of religious duty.
Muslims are ordered by Sharia law and the Koran to murder those who RESIST the JIHAD EVEN VERBALLY. A verbal COUNTERJIHADIST MUST BE KILLED according to SHARIA LAW.
‘Good’ Muslims kill blasphemers. So VIGILANTISM is NORMATIVE ISLAM, rather than an aberration.
Lydia says
This is like a mini picture frame depicting exactly what is wrong with islam!
And the irony! Shabir himself has admitted to the guilt of muslims, the victim only said ‘terrorists,’ and Shabir equated ‘terrorists’ with ‘muslims.’ So there you go! Ironically, that is the truth but who said it?!
And then there is this visual:
Person A: (A muslim holding and viciously punching a victim all over) “Say that muslims are NOT violent! SAY IT!!!” (Continues punching victim)
Person B: (victim) “Uh… okay, sure! Whatever you say man!” (With a puzzled look on his face…as muslim keeps punching him anyway…)
They just don’t get it.
gravenimage says
Muslims only lie about Islam not being violent when they believe they need to fool the Infidels. When they are in a position of power–even in a prison population–they no longer bother.
Henner720 says
Quran chatter 3 vers 28.
Keys says
Excellent visual, Lydia. Fits this post and points to the absurdity of naming Islam a religion of peace.
Mitthraw says
F-it! muslims (nearly exclusively, probably like in 99.9% of the time) ARE THE terrorists!!! now who trained them and armed that is another story… I see them as stupid tools who are being used and manipulated into someones agenda, namely NWO’s.
gravenimage says
UK: Jailed Muslim rape gang leader assaults non-Muslim inmate for opposing terrorism
………………………
The poor victim. I hope James Palmer will be protected from these ravening Muslims, but fear he won’t be.
And so much for the idea that these grooming gangs had nothing to do with Islam, but were just about easy sex and money. Were that the case, why would Shabir Ahmed be violently incensed over someone opposing terrorism?
John Forbes says
THIS IS THE CHILD RAPE MONSTER TERESA THE TERRIFIED CANNOT GET DEPORTED !
THE BRITISH PUBLIC SEEM UNAWARE THAT THEY ARE NOT ONLY PAYING TO KEEP A MONSTER LIKE THIS IN PRISON BUT ARE ALSO PAYING THE LEGAL COSTS OF ENSURING THAT THIS MONSTER NEVER GETS DEPORTED !
TERESA HAS NO CHANCE IN GETTING THIS EVIL CHILD RAPIST DEPORTED – NOT ONE IN A MILLION !!!
gravenimage says
Given Theresa May’s enabling of Jihad, I doubt she is going to try very hard to get him deported.
Gart says
He’s trying to get more years in prison because he faces deportation to Pakistan (dual nationality) He’ll be on the streets if that happens, a UK prison is a far better fate.
Joe says
The Islamic solution would be to sell him into slavery.
gravenimage says
Gart, your idea that this vicious Muslim only attacked this man because he wants to stay in prison is *very* questionable–Britain is giving these rapists large amounts of money to fight deportation:
“UK: Muslim rape gang members get over $1,300,000 legal aid to fight deportation”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/07/uk-muslim-rape-gang-members-get-over-1300000-legal-aid-to-fight-deportation
IanB says
Mr Palmer was right of course: terrorists should be eliminated. So should vile, sub-human paedophile gang rapists. The courts should recognise such behaviour follows the example of a certain so-called prophet who was a terrorist, murderer, rapist and paedophile himself … (notice I didn’t use the M word there).
Anne Smith says
I hope everyone is watching the unfolding story of Paul Golding and Jayda Fransen, leaders of the Britain First movement who have been drawing attention to the gangs of child rapists and publicising some who have not made it on to the front pages, such as the vile gang in Kent who raped a young girl who went into a kebab shop to ask for direction.
Ms Fransen and Mr Golding have been targeted by the British Police forces and charged with numerous specious offences just to try to keep them off the streets. They have now been charged for drawing attention to the Muslim rape gang in the Kent kebab shop. Apparently it is a “religiously motivated crime”.
In that case I shudder to think what we could call the Westminster Bridge bombings and the tube train bombing, but somehow that never seems to get a mention.
Incidentally I do not believe Mr Golding or Ms Fransen have ever struck or hurt anyone, or planted bombs or knifed anyone or incited anyone else to do so. Yet our British Police are treating them as the real terrorists. I just do not know what is happening to our country these days.
IanB says
I share your concern Anne. Our country has lost its way to PC Common Purpose insanity. I shall email Kent Police giving my support to Mr Paul Holding and Ms Jayda Fransen.
IanB says
Done.
gravenimage says
Anne and Ian, thanks for the information about Paul Golding and Jayda Fransen. This harassment by police would be appalling under any circumstances; that they are doing this when they don’t have enough staff to keep track of violent Jihadists is particularly repulsive.
Tom says
Where in all of this were the people who are supposed to supervise and control the inmates, the prison warders? According to the story it was other prisoners who broke up the attack.
Knowing the friction that is caused between muslims and others by acts of terror, why aren’t muslims, especially those who have committed aggregious acts such as grooming and raping non muslim children, segregated in british prisons?
One can only hope that someone even more mean and aggressive than this huge slob of a bully gets some revenge for not only the beating but also the raping of little girls. Karma has a way of coming back to bite.
gravenimage says
I hope so–but Muslims make up such a large–and aggressive–part of the prison population that it is often Infidels who are at risk.