“Citing rising anti-Muslim sentiments and stereotypes, she questioned whether animosity towards Muslims had reached the point ‘where many around the world are unable to see Muslims as victims. It leads one to wonder if the tables were turned, and these acts of violence were committed by Muslims, if the world’s response would have been as muted as the response that we are seeing here today.'”
This is exactly the opposite of reality. The international media raises an immense hue and cry over claims of Muslim victimhood: see the ongoing demonization of Israel and manufacture of “Palestinian” atrocities that are reported uncritically; the massive publicity accorded to Yasmin Seweid, the Muslim girl who falsely claimed Trump supporters had torn off her hijab on the New York subway, etc. But the Muslim persecution of Christians has received hardly any media coverage at all.
Moreover, there is considerable evidence that the suffering of the Rohingyas is, at least in part, more media creation than reality as well.
“Many are Unable to See Muslims as Victims’: Jordan’s Queen Rania on Rohingya Crisis,” albawaba, October 24, 2017:
Queen Rania of Jordan on Monday called on the international community to respond “effectively, quickly and generously” to alleviate the suffering of Myanmar’s Muslim Rohingya minority, decrying global inaction in the face of “what many are acknowledging now as an ethnic cleansing of the Rohingya Muslims,” according to a statement from her office.
Queen Rania gave remarks to the press during a visit to the Kutupalong Refugee Camp and its surrounding in the Cox’s Bazar region of Bangladesh. She spoke of the “shocking escalation of violence against the Muslim Rohingya minority in Myanmar,” which has caused over 600,000 Muslim Rohingya to flee from Myanmar’s Rakhine state since August.
“With no respect or regard for the principles of humanitarian and international law, the discrimination against and the persecution of the Rohingya minority has continued unabated, in full view of the world,” the Queen said in a statement she gave at the camp.
“One has to ask, why is the plight of this Muslim minority group being ignored? Why has this systematic persecution been allowed to play out for so long?” she added.
In her capacity as a board member of the International Rescue Committee (IRC) and as an advocate of the work of U.N. humanitarian agencies, the Queen toured the Kutupalong Refugee Camp, meeting with several Rohingya women and children, who recently crossed into Bangladesh from Rakhine state in Myanmar.
The refugees recounted the brutality they faced in their homeland, as well as the difficulties and deprivation they continue to experience in overcrowded makeshift camps.
Describing their stories of “unimaginable acts of violence,” Queen Rania mentioned refugees’ accounts of children orphaned, women brutalized, family members slaughtered, and villages burned.
“Before coming here, I had braced myself to witness some desperate conditions, but the stories I heard today were heartbreaking and harrowing,” she said.
“I’ve heard of systematic rape of young girls, who were trapped in schools and raped by soldiers. I’ve heard of babies being kicked around like footballs and stomped on. I’ve heard family members telling me how they’ve seen their own parents killed, right before their eyes,” she recalled.
“It is unforgivable that this crisis is unfolding on the world stage to a largely indifferent audience. The world seems to be silent to what many are acknowledging now as an ethnic cleansing of the Rohingya Muslims,” she said.
Citing rising anti-Muslim sentiments and stereotypes, she questioned whether animosity towards Muslims had reached the point “where many around the world are unable to see Muslims as victims”.
“It leads one to wonder if the tables were turned, and these acts of violence were committed by Muslims, if the world’s response would have been as muted as the response that we are seeing here today,” she added….
PRCS says
Is there another side to this narrative, oh Queen?
apexpoint says
But she never see the prosecuted Christians in Jordan, Lebanon and other ME countries as victims of Muslim violence.
EYESOPEN says
Of course not. Those FACTS don’t fit the muzlims (sic – on purpose) as “victims” narrative.
StacyGirl says
She a Palestinian who went on US network tv after 9/11 to decry the attack, BUT.,, she understood why it happened… yes she has another side to every story. The wrong phony side.
gravenimage says
She’s been doing things like this for a long time–her condemnation of terrorism is usually more like apologia. But too many Infidels fail to notice.
David says
What about the Rohingya muslim terrorists who have been attacking peaceful Buddhists for many years? This did not make the news, until Buddhist monks got the blame for finally retaliating.
gravenimage says
She’s demanding that we see the Rohingya as simple victims of Infidel violence–and if we don’t we are “Islamophobes”.
butros says
muslims told the same lies about Israel, why believe them now?
Peter Buckley says
Muslims ARE victims- of their own religion.
“Muslims are the first victims of Islam. Many times I have observed in my travels in the Orient, that fanaticism comes from a small number of dangerous men who maintain the others in the practice of religion by terror. To liberate the Muslim from his religion is the best service that one can render him.” —E. Renan
http://www.conflicts.rem33.com/images/books/Ibn%20Warraq%20-%20Why%20I%20Am%20Not%20a%20Muslim.pdf
Kilfincelt says
Agree! But you can’t fix stupid.
Peter Buckley says
The Internet has already started destroying Islam:
http://www.considerationsofacanadianex-muslim.org/Intro.html
http://www.answering-islam.org/Authors/Wood/islam_beheaded.htm
https://destroyislamnow.wordpress.com/2014/01/23/9-indications-the-twenty-first-century-will-be-the-century-when-islam-is-destroyed/
We’ve only had it a decade, and already Islam is such a basket case that muslims are trying to “reform” it. Meanwhile, look at what has happened in the past ten years:
https://www.salon.com/2014/06/12/atheism_explodes_in_saudi_arabia_where_just_talking_about_atheism_is_illegal_partner/
http://www.thecommentator.com/article/782/the_rise_of_atheism_in_pakistan
https://www.juancole.com/2014/02/death-iraqis-exists.html
ttp://en.qantara.de/content/turning-away-from-shia-in-iran-a-tsunami-of-atheism
http://www.firstpost.com/india/indias-ex-muslims-shedding-traditional-islam-for-science-3093252.html
http://thepoliticalinformer.com/where-indonesias-muslims-are-headed-in-the-next-22-years/
Just check out virtually any country………..
gravenimage says
Few Muslims are trying to “reform” Islam–many more are working to spread this savagery.
apexpoint says
Agree. But you cannot fix ” stupidity ” ( not stupid ).
gravenimage says
“You can’t fix stupid” is a figure of speech. No need to be so pedantic.
butros says
anal compulsive?
revereridesagain says
There is a name for women who marry powerful men for money, position, influence, and recognition. This one’s name is Rania. The generic one is SLUT.
balafama says
i’m no fan of the islamic religion but pls keep baseless accusations as well as vulgar and profane language out of this discussion. you have no evidence she married the king for money, influence or recognition. last i checked, it wasn’t a crime to marry a king or a rich and influential man .
queen rania’s dad happens to be a medical doctor and she is a university graduate who worked at a bank b4 marrying him .i would not call that slutty .
Susette says
Yes, she has had the benefits that her muslim sisters are forbidden from enjoying. Where is her hijab? If she cares so much, she should take them into Jordan, have them throw off their hijabs, use her wealth to give them educations, birth control and freedoms. As long as she condones islam, she condones this brutality. Islam is the problem.
Wellington says
Muslims as victims? Why, Muslims are the single greatest force for evil in all the world. Almost 32,000 documented Islamic terrorist attacks just since 9/11 is just partially dispositive of what a curse Muslims are to mankind.
Muslims as victims? Forget it, Queenie. Put a lid on it.
Greyhound Fancier says
It would also be interesting to map all the refugee camps in the world. How many are related to intolerable conditions in mohammedan countries, ruled, of course, by “the best people in the world”.
It’s hard to feel sorry for bullies when the shoe is on the other foot (if in fact that is what is happening).
Due to their penchant for dissembling, it’s hard to even credit the mohammedan complaints of mistreatment.
tim gallagher says
Agreed. 1400 years of barbaric Muslims slaughtering and bullying non-Muslims and we’re supposed to feel sympathy for the poor, “victimised” Muslims. No way in the world can I feel any sympathy for MUslims. It’s like asking us to feel sorry for the Nazis at the end of WWII. Maybe Islam is finally beginning to reap the reward for the evil inhumanity it has imposed on the world for all those 1400 years. And I agree, Greyhound Fancier, I pay no attention to anything Muslims tell us as they do nothing but lie to us. Like this woman’s lie. Their “complaints of mistreatment”. Maybe they’re copping a bit of justice for what they’ve done to others. And how one-sided is this whingeing Muslim woman, as Wellington points out, 32,000 Muslim terrorist attacks since 9/11, and they are the “victims”. Unbelievable. Muslims should wake up, look at their vile behaviour towards non-Muslims, and realise why so many of us loathe Islam. If you behave towards non-Muslims the way Muslims do, don’t expect to be liked or shown sympathy.
abad says
Not only that but she is a lousy Muslima.
She does not cover her hair at all nor her ugly face with a niqab.
Better yet, a trash bag over her would be better and make ISL happy, too
gravenimage says
Spot on, guys.
Benedict says
“Queen Rania of Jordan on Monday called on the international community to respond “effectively, quickly and generously” to alleviate the suffering of Myanmar’s Muslim Rohingya minority, decrying global inaction in the face of “what many are acknowledging now as an ethnic cleansing of the Rohingya Muslims,” according to a statement from her office.” –
Surely Saudi Arabia and its oil-rich neighbors have pumped millions of dollars into a rescue program for their fellow Muslim brothers and sisters. But why don’t we hear about it?
EYESOPEN says
The only millions of dollars the Soddy Barbarians (and other rich ME countries) provide is the money for MOSQUES in the countries of the West to provide the barracks for their muzlim “brothers” committed to hijra to the West.
dumbledoresarmy says
Oil-rich Saudi Arabia – and/ or Qatar – and/ or the Emirates – could pony up the cash for Bangladesh to house every single one of the so-called ‘rohingya’ in a five-star hotel for the rest of their lives. And barely even notice it. Pin money!
But they won’t.
Because the name of the game is to expand Islam. And if all the ‘rohingya’ Muslims leave Myanmar, then the Hijra has been reversed, and the Islamisation of Myanmar cannot proceed.
Emilie Green says
“Many around the world are unable to see Muslims as victims”
Good one.
You’ve a budding career in Vegas. Get yourself an agent. You’re on your way.
Vajapeya says
Why the hell would i see them as victims??!!! If they are ignorant (Being non-practicing or cultural Muslims or just practicing some parts) of the teachings of their own religions they are bad Muslims and are likely to be called as Munafiques, or takfiri would be declared on them by their more orthodox devoted brethren and they could be killed in more conservative Islamic countries. If they are good Muslims and know the teachings of the Quran, then they are dangerous to me a kafir and to millions like me. Also why doesn’t Her Majesty note that Islamic nations like Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, all filthy rich countries, do not take in their suffring Muslim brethren?
ByGeorge says
Yes, one wonders!
Islam_Macht_Frei says
Just as a rabid dog is both a victim of and a threat to spread rabies, so too are Muslims both victims of and threats to spread Islam.
EYESOPEN says
As well-put as I have ever heard. Thank you.
Chand says
So what do you do when a rabid dog bites? Shouldn’t that person who is bitten be saved? Or should that person be killed to save others from rabies? Killing off is easier. Treating and rehabilitating takes time and effort. But trying to kill a whole pack of rabid dogs is also dangerous. They are going to retaliate viciously to try and live.
Shouldn’t Muslim humans be cured off the virus/meme of Islam that has been infected into their brains automatically for having being born into that religion? Or should they be just shooed away, shot and killed?
Some of the Rohingyans surely are beyond redemption and are fanatical Islamists, for sure. But surely ALL of them shouldn’t be collectively punished for that. A whole ethnic or religious group can’t be suddenly declared as illegal immigrants and jihadis at the same time, shot at, their homes burnt and hounded out of the land they were (most of them) born in. No civilized nation does that.
But then the Myanmarese army has a long history of barbarity and inhumanity and no wonder many ethnic groups and tribes there are fighting them and want to secede, e.g. Kachin, Karen, Mon, Kuki, Shan, Nagas, etc.Even Madam Suu Kyi cannot control her army. The Buddhist ultra nationalists are also behaving in the most un-Buddhistic manner. The backward and brutal Myanmarese govt. should follow the civilized nations of the world like the US, UK, France, Germany, Spain, Russia, China, India, etc. who did not carry out ethnic cleansing of their Muslim minority populations in spite of very brutal Jihadi terrorist attacks there. Instead they took the logical and humane steps of targeting the Jihadi murderers, stopping radical jihadi propaganda, stepping up security and increasing surveillance. Attacking innocent Muslims just because they were born so is the easiest prescription to intensify the Jihadi problem.
Myanmar should take back their Rohingyan refugees, irrespective of religion or ethnicity, recognize their basic human rights and protect all innocents and establish the rule of law. At the same time, they should target the Jihadis, stop the Buddhist oppressors and develop the impoverished Rakine state.
Well, their govt. is already talking with Bangladesh to take them back after screening. Hope it happens.
On the other hand, failure to help these helpless masses will be a boon to the Jihadis, perpetually waiting on the wings to create trouble, who will have another cause so easily fall on their laps. International Jihadis are already preparing revenge attacks. Bangladeshi jihadis are training Rohingyans to re-enter Myanmar for attacks. They were even infiltrating refugee camps in India. They might also take alternate routes and may attack Myanmarese cities and towns too.
All Muslim problems aren’t the same. The plight of the masses of these Rohingyan Muslims isn’t the same as problems elsewhere. Preventing this ethnic cleansing will contribute to the war on Jihad. The immediate problem is preventing Jihad which is a real and present danger worldwide. Muslim-bashing and Islam-bashing and Muhammad-abusing is all fine and can be leisurely conducted anytime.
Preventing Jihad is urgent.
David says
What about the Rohingya muslim terrorists who have been attacking peaceful Buddhists for many years? This did not make the news, until Buddhist monks got the blame for finally retaliating.
TL says
Your antijihad fanaticism won’t become reasonable if you refuse to accept the following SELF-EVIDENT propositions:
No Muslims, no mujahids. No mujahids, no jihad.
In other words, a planet with no Muslims is a planet with no mujahids, and a planet with no mujahids is a planet with no jihad.
gravenimage says
Muslim apologist Chand wrote:
So what do you do when a rabid dog bites? Shouldn’t that person who is bitten be saved? Or should that person be killed to save others from rabies? Killing off is easier. Treating and rehabilitating takes time and effort.
……………………………….
Humans *decide* whether or not to embrace an ideology, and whether or not to carry out the diktats of that ideology. They are not automatons, even if they were born into that creed.
Besides, the idea that the “filthy Infidels” are able to “rehabilitate” Jihadists is highly questionable–indeed, there are “deradicalization” programs all over the world, and they have never worked.
More:
Shouldn’t Muslim humans be cured off the virus/meme of Islam that has been infected into their brains automatically for having being born into that religion? Or should they be just shooed away, shot and killed?
……………………………….
How often have we seen *this*–the claim that if we don’t want to be killed by Muslims, that we are actually the ones who are threatening violence.
Nothing but projection.
More:
A whole ethnic or religious group can’t be suddenly declared as illegal immigrants and jihadis at the same time…
……………………………….
In other words, we have no right to keep ravening Jihadists out of our lands.
More:
The backward and brutal Myanmarese govt. should follow the civilized nations of the world like the US, UK, France, Germany, Spain, Russia, China, India, etc. who did not carry out ethnic cleansing of their Muslim minority populations in spite of very brutal Jihadi terrorist attacks there.
……………………………….
Firstly, notice the claim that there is nothing between violent “ethnic” (as though Islam were an ethnicity!) cleansing and just rolling over and accepting being the victims of violent Jihad. What rot.
Then, there is the demand that we simply accept that Muslims are going to regularly mass-murder us, and that we should be passive in the face of that threat to our own people.
More:
Instead they took the logical and humane steps of targeting the Jihadi murderers, stopping radical jihadi propaganda, stepping up security and increasing surveillance.
……………………………….
Uh…right. As though the UK, France, Germany, or Spain or most of these other nations have prevented Jihad preaching–what utter crap.
As for surveillance, there have been many Jihad terror attacks in Britain, France, and Germany *from Muslims on watch lists–something Chand almost certainly knows.
More:
Attacking innocent Muslims just because they were born so is the easiest prescription to intensify the Jihadi problem.
……………………………….
Again, the claim that adhering to a violent creed is a matter of birth.
And further, Chand is claiming–as we have seen so often–that if we dare defend against Jihad that ordinary Muslims will all become violent Jihadists, and it will be our fault. If these Muslims were actually “moderates”, why would they be so eager to wage Jihad against us?
More:
Myanmar should take back their Rohingyan refugees, irrespective of religion or ethnicity, recognize their basic human rights and protect all innocents and establish the rule of law. At the same time, they should target the Jihadis, stop the Buddhist oppressors and develop the impoverished Rakine state.
……………………………….
Yes–the filthy Infidels have to clasp pious Muslims to their bosom. They are also responsible for any poverty in Muslim areas, so get that Jizya ready *now*–and if you don’t, then violent Jihad is *your* fault. Repeat, ad nauseum…
More:
Well, their govt. is already talking with Bangladesh to take them back after screening. Hope it happens.
……………………………….
Didn’t Chand just demand that Myanmar take them all back?
More:
On the other hand, failure to help these helpless masses will be a boon to the Jihadis, perpetually waiting on the wings to create trouble, who will have another cause so easily fall on their laps. International Jihadis are already preparing revenge attacks.
……………………………….
Yes–funny how all of these peaceful Muslims are always poised to wage violent Jihad.
And look at what they are getting “revenge” for–any Infidels who react if Muslims are waging violent Jihad. See? *Any* defense against violent Jihad is the cause for *more violent Jihad*.
More:
Bangladeshi jihadis are training Rohingyans to re-enter Myanmar for attacks. They were even infiltrating refugee camps in India. They might also take alternate routes and may attack Myanmarese cities and towns too.
……………………………….
So–Chand *knows* this, but still demands that Myanmar take all of these Jihadists back…
More:
All Muslim problems aren’t the same.
……………………………….
Actually, they are all surprisingly similar. If any nation has a Muslim population beyond a percentage point or two, they have a problem with violent Jihad. And the larger the Muslim population, the more pervasive the problem with violent Jihad. This is a quite consistent pattern, all over the world.
More:
The plight of the masses of these Rohingyan Muslims isn’t the same as problems elsewhere. Preventing this ethnic cleansing will contribute to the war on Jihad. The immediate problem is preventing Jihad which is a real and present danger worldwide.
……………………………….
Ah, yes. One “prevents Jihad” by allowing millions of Muslims–many with a proven track record of violence–to flood into their nation…sarc/off
More:
Muslim-bashing and Islam-bashing and Muhammad-abusing is all fine and can be leisurely conducted anytime.
Preventing Jihad is urgent.
……………………………….
Right–educating about the threat of Jihad is nothing but “abuse”, and is a leisurely activity unconnected to preventing Jihad.
The way one “prevents Jihad”, according to Chand, is by allowing as many Muslims as possible to flood into your nations–and then to be sure that enough Jizya is bestowed upon them that they don’t, after all, begin waging violent Jihad. And if they do, then they are not receiving enough Jiyza, and the Infidels better step it up…
Does anyone else see how well Chand’s demands are working?
Hiugo Hackenbush says
The queen looks fabulous in her burka! Oh, wait, never mind. And was it 50 or 75 thousand refugees that will be going to Jordan? D’OH!! Never mind.
silvergreycat says
Hugo.
*… And was it 50 or 75 thousand refugees that will be going to Jordan?* Iraqi, Palestinian, and Syrian refugees are already there… http://carnegieendowment.org/2015/09/21/jordan-s-refugee-crisis-pub-61338
Hugo Hackenbush says
Thank you for the link. Very interesting. From the article: Jordan has a long record of providing asylum to persecuted peoples. Throughout the kingdom’s history, it has adroitly leveraged refugee populations to obtain greater political and economic support from patron nations.
Seems the influx was a calculated political move that led to issues. Who would have thought!
gravenimage says
Yep.
silvergreycat says
Hugo,
*Thank you for the link.* You’re welcome.
*Very interesting.* Agreed.
*….Seems the influx was a calculated political move that led to issues.* Every action taken, it seems, can have unexpected results.
NYgal says
Palestinian refugees in Jordan? Really? Jordan is Palestine. As a matter of fact 75% out of the Palestinian Mandate the British set aside and created Jordan, setting on the throne an Arab sheik from Medina, instead of creating the Jewish Homeland they were tasked to create by the League of Nations.
The fact that anybody would called Arabs leaving in Jordan ‘Palestinian refugees’ is a gall.
Hugo Hackenbush says
Right you are! See the book by Joan Peters “From Time Immemorial” regarding that very issue.
gravenimage says
Exactly. “Palestinian” Muslims *already have a state*–Jordan.
Homer says
Meanwhile, in the real world: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/south-asia/rohingya-hacks-to-death-bangladeshi-amid-rising-tensions/articleshow/61310380.cms.
gravenimage says
Horrifying–but not surprising, Homer.
Kesselman says
Eat it up, Queenie. Moslems are despised exactly because of their unfriendliness and urge to follow a medieval pedophile’s rantings about utter nonsense.
Angry Aussie says
Just as Muslims are unable to see the rest of the world as victims. Oh, except we aren’t killing them.
utis says
Why should they get more concern than the Yazidis? Or the Copts, or other African Christians?
I notice she doesn’t have a hijab. Rank hath its privileges? Or is Jordan a temporary “moderate” state?
Karen says
Excellent questions that demand an answer.
apexpoint says
She doesn’t want to be a victim of Islam.to be wearing the hijab.
silvergreycat says
uyis,
*…I notice she doesn’t have a hijab.* Her thoughts (from a BBC interview)…*I am a staunch supporter of every woman’s right to wear the Hijab, just as I am a staunch supporter of every woman’s right to choose not to wear it.
…I personally choose not to and I hope, and I expect, for my decision to be respected.*
source… https://www.queenrania.jo/en/media/interviews/interview-bbc-queen-rania-i-am-staunch-supporter-every-woman%e2%80%99s-right-wear-hijab-jus
*Rank hath its privileges?* Possibly (I’m not certain about the country’s policy).
*Or is Jordan a temporary “moderate” state?* Emily Hawthorne (Stratfor) has more details… https://www.stratfor.com/analysis/strangely-stable-kingdom-jordan
Georg says
“many around the world are unable to see Muslims as victims”
That’s why the words Hinduphobia, Christianophobia, Judeophobia, Scientolophobia, Mormonophobia, Yazidiphobia, Zoroastrophobia and Sikhophobia so dominate the headlines.
LeftisruiningCanada says
One even reads them in Canadian speech-limiting law proposals….
PRCS says
“The UN has described Myanmar’s crackdown on the Rohingya as “textbook” ethnic cleansing”
Oh, yeh. The U.N.
Voytek Gagalka says
Why “the world” should care to help Rohingya minority? Did Jordan ever help anyone who is not Muslim? Why they always cry for help only when their fellow Ummah members are “prosecuted” (if indeed prosecuted they are, and we have strong inclinations that they are not and fully deserve what’s happening to them)?
JawsV says
Dear Queen: I couldn’t care less about Muslims and I despise anti-Jew/Christian Islam.
RAB says
Even without knowing the Koran, the Sirah, and the Hadith ,anyone who knows anything at all about Buddhist philosophy and Islamic supremacist ideology would realize immediately that the Muslims started it and the Buddhists were finally paying them back in kind. The “queen” cant’ tell the difference between fact and fiction. Fact: Muslims are the aggressors. the Buddhists and everyone else who is not Muslim are the victims
Sam says
These so called “Royalties” are really ignorant or evil? Either case what they are enabling Islam. So they are enemies of freedom and America.
Lydia says
Hmmm… maybe that’s because 99% of the time… they’re NOT?!?
Lydia says
And that statement should read that “many around the world are unable to see that Christians and others are victims of muslims”!
Guest says
Victims need sympathy not the attackers
William says
In retrospect to the queen, has she ever thought that the Muslim culture is the main cause of their being “victims.” Their definition of Tolerance is bloody
Older Canadian says
When you are born into, then enslaved in a religion that does not allow an exit except via death, yes then I guess you can call them victims.
PGuud says
There has never been, nor could there ever be, a Muslim victim. Victim and Victimizer are mutually exclusive modes of being. Islam is the patent holder of the latter.
Islam: where freedom ends and slavery begins.
Sarah says
I keep writing and re-writing my comment and its just becoming this stupidly long rant – and we all know it, we’ve all heard it before. So all I have to say, is that this vile POS is just like every other Muslim on the planet – a self-made victim and a dangerous waste of space who insists on propping up a cesspit of an ideology designed to cause fear, pain and slaughter for the rest of us..
Go back to perusing Vogue and buying millions of dollars of empty headed luxury purchases, you stupid witch. Its about all that you’re good for.
Flavius Claudius Iulianus says
Tamaskan tatamakan – “show a victim’s face [and] take over”.
And like they say, Queenie, fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me!
abad says
Queen Rania, did you fulfill your daily quota like a good Muslima??
If not then I suggest doing so by sundown, your time, otherwise Allah will be displeased with you.
gravenimage says
Jordan’s Queen Rania: “Many around the world are unable to see Muslims as victims”
……………………
Notice that–as here–when Muslims *are* victims, they are almost always the victims of *other Muslims*.
Save Europe says
Rania!!!! Victims of what precisely? All I see is non Muslim victims OF Muslims!!!!
fbijihadidefender says
Muslim Rohingya is waging jihad against Buddhists and infidels in Myanmar. When Buddhists and infidels defend themselves, suddenly Muslim Rohingya become victim of ethnic cleansing.
Gamaliel says
Here is the Buddhist side of the story.
https://youtu.be/qvEBaAiy5b4?t=98
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LmDKjsMbaiM
Gamaliel says
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvEBaAiy5b4&feature=youtu.be&t=98
carol says
“Muslims are like African Carps” – good analogy.
Smarty says
Not getting the nasty tone of the comments. We should never applaud or dismiss rape of children or mass murder, regardless of religious status. Very tragic.
TL says
Of course you don’t understand the “nasty” tone. Sentimental perversity is your m.o., and obtusity is your favorite refuge from reality.
Now save your righteous hand wringing for the occasion of your first meeting with “Rohingya” parents, leaders, and elders, i.e. the arrogant pests who provoked the expulsion of “Rohingya” children–who are the next generation of pests. You can ask them why they hate their own children so much.
gravenimage says
Smarty, Muslims in Myanmar are slaughtering Buddhists and other Infidels there. This is a Jihad, just as in so many other places in the world.
Carolyne says
“Too many young girls are being systematically raped!” The next time Her Majesty zips over to Paris for the haute couture collections,(I’ve seen her big black plane sitting on the runway at Le Bourget) she might zip over to Birmingham and see where “Young girls are being systemically raped” by Muslims.
She might also acquaint herself with why the natives of Burma are fighting a Muslim takeover of their country.
She doesn’t look like a Muslim, her hair is revealed to any man who wishes to see it and go into a sexual frenzy, her face, which is beautiful, is not concealed as Mohammed commanded, one can see her wrists and ankles and (Oh No) neck. She is a Westernized woman who pretends to be an observing Muslim. It would be much better if all Muslim women were allowed to live freely as she does. It takes some never to live her lifestyle and advocate for Muslim women who are beaten daily, forced to wear garbage bags, married as children, and require their husband or father’s permission to walk down the street. Also if she does not do these things, her male guardian’s honor is damaged and he may kill her.and never leave their homes where they are forced to live with three other wives and numerous concubines. Being a queen has its perks.
Carolyne says
Spellcheck is going to be the end of me. It should be “Nerve to live her lifestyle.”
UNCLE VLADDI says
“IF” the tables were turned?!
Seriously?!
But hadn’t you heard?! Being angry at (“hateful” towards) criminals is now the most vile sin, while pitying (“tolerating”) them all as “fellow victims,” is to be deemed the highest moral virtue, these days!
So much so, that the only advice we hear from “our” hypocrite governments, their pet media, and the corporazi globalist banksters who own them all, seems to invariably be:
“Anyone who doesn’t automatically pity all criminals as fellow victims should be hated!”
Jack Holan says
Queen Rania and King Addula you expect the Worlds public to see Muslims as victims. One only need to turn on on Jordan TV to witness the opulence of His Royal Court the Wealth and Grandeaur is your Country a full Democracy without Royal oversight? NO! So, this farcical and mythical victimhood starts at. Home long before the the migrant reaches Europe or the USA. YOU MADE THESE PROBLEMS SO SPEND YOUR WEALTH TIME FIXING WHAT NEEDS TO BE FIXED