Ahmadi spokesman Qasim Rashid is a professional liar, a one-man cottage industry of deception and hypocrisy. He has whitewashed Muhammad’s support for torture and the reality of jihad violence and Sharia oppression; dissembled about the Qur’an’s sanction of deception of unbelievers; lied about the presence of violent passages in the Qur’an; lied about the Qur’an’s sanction of beating disobedient women; lied about the nature of Sharia; called for limitations on the freedom of speech and expression to outlaw behavior and speech some Muslims may find offensive; and lied about Muhammad’s stance toward the persecution of Christians. He has even blamed Christianity for Islam’s death penalty for blasphemy. When challenged about the “facts” he has presented, he (like virtually all other Islamic supremacists) responds with furious ad hominem contempt, but never answers the refutations of his articles on substantive grounds — because, of course, he cannot do so.
In this one, however, Qasim Rashid has outdone himself, claiming that “the teachings of Islam could help us prevent more sexual abuse scandals.” This is true in one sense: since Islam doesn’t actually recognize many varieties of sexual abuse as wrongdoing, the scandals would go away. But the abuse wouldn’t. Much more below.
“How the teachings of Islam could help us prevent more sexual abuse scandals,” by Qasim Rashid, Independent, October 15, 2017:
If the Harvey Weinstein sexual abuse revelations shocked you, then you’re dangerously ignorant to reality. According to RAINN, an American is assaulted every 98 seconds, one out of every six women will deal with rape or attempted rape in her lifetime, and 90 per cent of rape victims are women.
I’m a Muslim, and a civil rights lawyer with a special interest in advocating for women’s rights. My advocacy is informed not just by the law, but by strategies detailed in Islamic teachings and Prophet Muhammad’s example to pre-empt sexual abuse. Yes, the cancer of sexual abuse against women that we see in Christian majority America is just as prevalent in Muslim majority Pakistan, but also in Hindu majority India and state atheist China. This proves that men worldwide are failing in our responsibility to end sexual abuse and gender based violence….
Rashid contradicts himself here. He says that “the cancer of sexual abuse against women that we see in Christian majority America is just as prevalent in Muslim majority Pakistan,” yet claims below that “rather than preach empty dogmatic theories, Islam instead prescribes a proven secular model.” Proven where? In which Islamic country has sexual abuse been eradicated or even lessened by people following Islamic teachings? If not in Islam-besotted Pakistan, then where?
This is where Islamic teachings and Prophet Muhammad’s example provide a solution that no state truly can. And while there are people who don’t believe that sexual abuse is even a problem, some on the left will disagree that accountability to a higher power is a solution.
This is a reasonable argument, in part, due to the hypocrisy of allegedly religious men like Congressman Tim Murphy, who condemns abortion and infidelity, yet was caught encouraging his mistress to have one, or former Indiana GOP chair Rick Halvorsen who was convicted of incest. Yes, Islam implores accountability to the creator, but rather than preach empty dogmatic theories, Islam instead prescribes a proven secular model.
In a recent internationally broadcast lecture given live before roughly 6,000 Muslim women, the Khalifa of Islam said, “Chapter four, verse two of the Holy Quran…clarifies that women were not created out of the body of a man or from his rib. Rather, the Quran testifies to the fact that men and women were created from a single soul and are of the same kind and species.”
Thus, the Quran 4:2 first establishes men and women as equal beings. Chapter 4:20 then forbids men from forcing a woman to act against her will, thereby ensuring women maintain autonomy and self-determination.
Rashid’s Qur’an is one verse off from the standard edition. It’s 4:1 that says “O mankind, fear your Lord, who created you from one soul and created from it its mate and dispersed from both of them many men and women,” and it’s 4:19 that says, “O you who have believed, it is not lawful for you to inherit women by compulsion.” That is not exactly the same thing as forbidding men from forcing women to act against their will; it refers only to forcing them to be given in inheritance. As always, Rashid’s pieces are notable more for what they leave out than what they put in: Rashid doesn’t mention that the same chapter of the Qur’an says that a man can have sexual relations with “those your right hands possess” (4:3, 4:24), i.e., slave girls whose consent is neither required nor sought.
This verse also commands men to consort with women in kindness, forbidding men from so much as thinking ill of their wives. This preempts emotional and mental abuse. Chapter 4:35 furthermore prevents violence against women by forcing men to control themselves and never resort to physically harming women – preempting physical abuse.
In reality, 4:34 says just the opposite. It doesn’t forbid men to harm women physically. Instead, it says to beat women from whom a man “fears disobedience”: “Men have authority over women because Allah has made the one superior to the other, and because they spend their wealth to maintain them. Good women are obedient. They guard their unseen parts because Allah has guarded them. As for those from whom you fear disobedience, admonish them and send them to beds apart and beat them.”
In case anyone is skeptical that Rashid’s verse citations are one verse off from the standard Qur’anic verse divisions, here is 4:35: “And if you fear dissension between the two, send an arbitrator from his people and an arbitrator from her people. If they both desire reconciliation, Allah will cause it between them. Indeed, Allah is ever Knowing and Acquainted.” Nothing in that verse says anything about not physically harming women.
The Quran further obliges men to provide for a woman’s every financial need, while holding that anything a woman earns is hers alone – preempting financial abuse. And when it comes to the Islamic concept of Hijab, it is men who are first commanded to never gawk at women, and instead guard their private parts and chastity, regardless of how women choose to dress – pre-empting sexual abuse.
In reality, the Qur’an says: “O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused. And ever is Allah Forgiving and Merciful.” (33:59) The implication there is that if women do not cover themselves adequately with their outer garments, they may be abused, and that such abuse would be justified. And indeed, the assumption behind the hijab is not that a man must not gawk at women, but that women are responsible for making sure that they don’t. And if men gawk anyway, the woman he is gawking at could end up being punished.
Prophet Muhammad himself illustrated this point. In a famous incident, a woman described as strikingly beautiful approached the Prophet to seek his guidance on some religious matters. The Prophet’s companion, Al Fadl, began to stare at her because of her beauty. Noting this, the Prophet Muhammad did not scold the woman for her attire, but instead, he “reached his hand backwards, catching Al Fadl’s chin, and turned his face to the other side so that he would not gaze at her”.
Accordingly, the Prophet Muhammad by example demonstrated that the burden of modesty, respect, and combating abuse of women rests on men. Indeed, men must take the lead in stopping such sexual abuse. After all, while the Quran obliges women to dress modestly as a covenant with God, Islam prescribes no punishment whatsoever for women who choose to dress otherwise.
On the contrary, on numerous occasions Prophet Muhammad punished an accused rapist on the testimony of the rape survivor alone. In this environment of gender equity, women in Islam rise to the rank of legal scholars, warriors, entrepreneurs, and philanthropists while lovingly embracing identities as mothers and housewives.
In reality, Muhammad condoned the rape of captive Infidel women: “The Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) sent a military expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the battle of Hunain. They met their enemy and fought with them. They defeated them and took them captives. Some of the Companions of the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) were reluctant to have intercourse with the female captives in the presence of their husbands who were unbelievers. So Allah, the Exalted, sent down the Qur’anic verse: (Sura 4:24) ‘And all married women (are forbidden) unto you save those (captives) whom your right hands possess.’” (Sunan Abu Dawud 2150; see also Sahih Muslim 3433) “O Allah’s Apostle! We get female captives as our share of booty, and we are interested in their prices, what is your opinion about coitus interruptus?” The Prophet said, “Do you really do that? It is better for you not to do it. No soul that which Allah has destined to exist, but will surely come into existence.” (Sahih Bukhari 34:432) “I drove them along until I brought them to Abu Bakr who bestowed that girl upon me as a prize. So we arrived in Medina. I had not yet disrobed her when the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) met me in the street and said: ‘Give me that girl.’” (Sahih Muslim 4345)
So not only does Muhammad allow the rape, cautioning only against coitus interruptus, but he seizes one of the slave girls for himself.
Qasim Rashid undoubtedly knows the material I am quoting here. He is being deliberately deceptive, to hoodwink people into ignorance and complacency regarding the sexual abuse that is rampant and taken for granted in Muslim countries. In the final analysis, he is on Harvey Weinstein’s side.
Peter Buckley says
Happy to note one look at the comments section says it all:
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/harvey-weinstein-islam-sexual-assault-rape-womens-rights-a8001521.html
Jayell says
Yes, I looked at those comments. This is just one newspaper, and not the most popular. Anyone who thinks that the UK is going down the Islamic plughole can rest assured that there are probably more than a few million out there who are well on the ball when it comes to islam and are not going to be taken in by the fatuous garbage in the article here, which is a gross insult to the intelligence of the British public. With the evidence of all the Islamic atrocities and near-atrocities in UK and the rest of the world well ant truly in the public domain, and now that the truth about the rape gangs is out, It’s more than obvious that our Friends of the Great Prophet realise that, more and more, they are NOT amongst friends in the population of the UK. Hence all the increasing habitual bleating from them about ‘islamophobia’ and ‘someone’s going to attack them with a rasher of bacon or write a naughty word on a mosque wall’ or ‘they don’t feel safe anymore’. Good, because no-one else has felt safe in the UK since they’ve been around, and if they’re expecting sympathy in the UK they’re most certainly NOT going to get it. Furthermore, if this clown Qasim Rashid really believes that he can con the British public with a catalogue of transparent contrived, misleading trash like this article, then he will only succeed in further straining the patience of the public in the UK to the point where they will really forget their manners.
Peter Buckley says
Like just about everywhere in the West, Islam is viewed very negatively:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/aug/02/poll-islam-negative-britain
That poll is quite old , and the figure will be much higher now, confirmed a few years later by this one:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_oIUHRRCTM
Interestingly, the muslim population is (still) around 5%.
No way back for Islam now.
mortimer says
QUESTION: HOW IS IMITATING A SEX ADDICT MOHAMMED GOING TO STOP SEX ADDICTION?
“The prophet did not die till all women were permitted him”
– (According to Ibn Sa’ad, Kitab Al Tabaqat Al Kubra, v.8, 194).
gravenimage says
Wow, Peter–the *vast majority* of these comments on this Independent article are very Islamo-savvy. I am heartily glad to see it.
Save Europe says
Yes!!!! The Independent’s comments section regularly gets owned by sensible people posting and railing against this vile newspaper’s Marxist political dogma and rubric. Along with The Guardian this is THE worst paper in the UK, bar none.
PaulM says
Which come as quite a shock really. Considering that Saudi Arabia has purchased a number of British newspapers.
Milad Meah says
Islam can “help us prevent more sexual abuse scandals”
Here are just two examples
1. Robert Spencer in PJ Media: Janet Jackson ‘Felt Like a Prisoner’ in Marriage to Muslim
Robert Spencer in PJ Media: Janet Jackson ‘Felt Like a Prisoner’ in Marriage to Muslim
2. UK: Muslim accused of honor killing 19-year-old woman
UK: Muslim accused of honor killing 19-year-old woman
fbijihadidefender says
Devil don’t lie ? Islam don’t promote sexual abuse ? Muslim don’t use taqiyya against infidel ?
Until the day people of “religion of peace” start eating pork, we shall not take it seriously.
Bandor says
Being a vegetarian, the fact that Islam forbids the eating of pork, would be the least of my criticisms.
Obviously though, they don’t eat it for different reasons than myself.
Muslims are actually allowed to eat pork or bacon, if there is no other alternative food available, As it is not considered a sin under these circumstances, due to the law of necessity.
gravenimage says
I’m a vegetarian myself, but I don’t like to see Infidels bowing to Muslim demands that pork not be served.
Bandor says
I know what you mean, it’s not so much the actual issue, but the fact it is used against others. I just view the non eating of pork, as being a lesser issue, as most religions have some dietary requirements anyway. There are far worse concerns with Islam, such as female genital mutilation, the status of women, the Halal method of slaughter, their attitude towards other religions, etc that would concern me a lot more than not eating pork or bacon.
gravenimage says
Bandor, it is not that Muslims do not eat pork–it is that they are trying to impose this on others.
Observant Jews don’t eat pork, nor do vegetarians–but they are not trying to violently impose this on others.
Bandor says
Gravenimage, there’s a lot of aspects of Islam that they attempt to violently impose on others. I would say that the dietary requirements are probably the most mild form of imposition though. That’s really my main point. I know that they are certainly not doing it for animal welfare reasons, but regardless of the reasons for Muslims not eating pork or bacon, it’s at least preferable that they aren’t doing i, although they certainly don’t win any plaudits for their treatment of other animals through the use of their Halal slaughter method.
Jack Diamond says
Islam can “help us prevent more sexual abuse scandals” because under Islam they are not scandals, they are not against the law, and there is no one to report them to (unless the woman wants to be jailed for admitting to fornication).
Unless she wears her “don’t rape me, rape her” slave rags and garbage sacks, that is. Only her husband can rape and beat her then.
For if you want sex abuse scandals, Muhammad makes Harvey look like a piker. “Prophet Muhammad punished an accused rapist on the testimony of the rape survivor alone.” Which is why he made it a requirement there be four male (Muslim) witnesses to prove rape. Or made a woman’s testimony worth half that of a man. Meanwhile, he was busy selecting the youngest and prettiest captives for his tent the night after murdering their husbands and fathers. This merciful profit, this model of conduct.
I
gravenimage says
*Exactly*, Jack.
tedh754 says
would it help with the heartbreak of psoriasis?
Lookmann says
For all his defence of Islam, he and his sect are not accepted as Muslims
”Ahmedis should stop pretending to be Muslims if they want equal status”, says Punjab law minister
https://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2017/10/13/ahmedis-should-stop-pretending-to-be-muslims-if-they-want-equal-status-says-punjab-law-minister/
Recently Algeria also imposed severe curbs on Ahmadis.
Indonesia closed down their so called ‘mosques’
I am baffled why they are clinging on to Islam.
They are not even worthy of punishment for apostasy as per Islamic laws.
After all they are not Muslims since they think Mo is not the last Prophet as the founder this sect is considered equal to Mo.
Clearly this is against the second command of ‘Shahada’
Gart says
Qasim ‘Ahmadiyya Muslim’ Rashid, a sect persecuted by sunni and shia alike, a masochist.
Curious Observer says
Qasim Rashid is right, but in a perverse way. Islam’s doctrines sanctify all acts that other religions consider to be sexual abuse, hence there can be no sexual abuse charges raised against muslim men. Therefore, the number of incidents of sexual abuse go down exponentially. It’s the old argument that if something is not reported, it did not occur. NO ONE SHOULD BUY THIS MAN’S BS.
gravenimage says
So true.
Linde Barrera says
To Curious Observer- I am making this statement in light of Qasim Rashid’s pronoucements: “If there were an ‘Olympics of Propaganda, Deceit and Lying’, Islamists would walk away with all the gold medals.” ?
Stan Lee says
We speak in terms of “Sexual Abuse Scandals” because that is literally what they are in our universe.,
Rashid’s goal is to contradict our western values and coax us into belief in Islam, where sexual abuse “scandals don’t exist”, but sexual abuse in all forms we think of as scandalous DO EXIST.
They are actually recommended and directives as part of Islamic life. A female (of any age) has any possible freedoms stifled from birth. Her freedoms are results of her male overlord’s will.
Ren says
Muhammad was a rapist and he’s the founder of islam. How then can islam “help us prevent more sexual abuse scandals”? It only will create more sexual abuse scandals.
Krazy Kafir says
The stealth muslims are, by far, the most dangerous to the freedoms of the west.
Islamic mirror says
Muhammad had sex with a dead Aunt
• ” The Muslim legal text, al-Sharwani’s Hawashi, confirms that sex with a dead woman is not sinful or wrong according to Islamic law. This law is based on the example set by Muhammad. According to the hadith, Muhammad had sex with a dead woman before she was put in the grave.
• The gravediggers were so embarrassed that they proceeded to bury the woman’s corpse and the prophet with dirt, exclaiming, “O Prophet, we see you do a thing you never did with anyone else.” Muhammad answered: “I have dressed her in my shirt so that she may be dressed in heavenly robes, and I have farewell intercourse with her in her grave so that the torments of the grave may be alleviated from her.” Recently a new law was proposed in the Muslim Brotherhood dominated Egyptian parliament. It would allow for “farewell intercourse” with a wife’s dead body. Obviously Muslims know very well about this demented practice by Mohammed. Postmortem sex is apparently a traditional value within Islam. Civilized people call it necrophilia and it’s a criminal act.
Under definition of Fatawa , in Wikipedia
In 2011-2012, Abdel-Bari Zamzami of Morocco issued a series of religious edicts that a man has the right to engage in sexual intercourse with his wife up to six hours after her death [47] despite recognizing that such an action is despicable in mainstream society, Zamzami persisted in backing his original fatwa, claiming marriage does not end in death.
Yes and this is a civilized religion ??
For a woman to prove rape, four adult males of “impeccable” character must witness the incident. Systemic misogyny and systemic patriarchy combine in Islam to create a systemic rape culture… just don’t do it to a Muslim woman. However, when a Muslim rapes a Muslim woman or girl… don’t worry! Sharia law requires four males to witness or eight females to witness it … the lights must be on so they can see it clearly and they must see rape from a good angle to know that it isn’t just rubbing against the woman. Since all these conditions cannot be met perfectly, no rape can be proved to the satisfaction of a Sharia court.
The Qur’an teaches that Infidel women can be lawfully taken for sexual use (cf. its allowance for a man to take “captives of the right hand,” 4:3, 4:24, 23:1-6, 33:50, 70:30). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused. And ever is Allah Forgiving and Merciful.” (33:59) The implication there is that if women do not cover themselves adequately with their outer garments, they may be abused, and that such abuse would be justified.
At any rate, K.4.24 even clearly states that married captives may be raped…if they are infidel, disbelieving kafirs. This shows that not only is Islam a religion of rape, but a religion of complete bigotry. Rape is shown by K.4.224 to be normative Islam, rather than an aberration.
K.4.24 allows the rape of married captives, but K.33.59 permits unveiled women to be ‘MOLESTED’ as the verse clearly states.
Look at verse K.33.59 and explain… WHO will do the ‘MOLESTING’ of the unveiled women?
K.4.24 implies that unveiled women will be mistaken for KAFIR women and molested by Muslim males. Enjoy posing this question to Muslims…often.)
Allah Forgiving and Merciful.” (33:59) The implication there is that if women do not cover themselves adequately with their outer garments, they may be abused, and that such abuse would be justified. this is MUSLIM
Islam doesn’t object to marital rape ,it doesn’t objects to rape of kafir women and doesn’t objects to the rape of children What Islam DOES object to is the rape of Muslim women (who are ‘owned’ by a Muslim male) or the rape of SLAVES who are ‘owned’ by a Muslim male.
There is no punishment in Sharia law for raping a kafir, though a Sharia judge might POSSIBLY apply a small FINE against the rapist in the rape case of KAFIR woman. Mostly, it would be the fault of the KAFIR woman that she was raped by a Muslim.
(1,400 British non-Muslim children were gang-raped and brutalized by Muslims in Rotherham)
When the “vilest of beasts” – unclean kaffir girls – are raped by “the best of peoples raised up for mankind” it is “their penalty for disbelief”. So said Maulana Bulandshahri.
https://libertygb.org.uk/news/and-take-their-wives-war-booty
MFritz says
Like becoming the mafia will prevent more organised crime?
Rosewood11 says
islam IS the ULTIMATE sexual abuse scanal!!!
I wonder about leftists says
Not only a death cult but a dead cult. The Koran alone is a book that can put terror and fear in people, because people can not comprehend such vile crazy acts.
It is demonic to have sexual relations after death. I did not know that Mohammed has written this in the Koran too. I am lost for words at the moment, how sinister. After this nothing will surprise me any more.Intercourse with a corps. They have to go.
mortimer says
Islam is a RAPE CULT giving unparalleled permission to Islamic warriors to sexually abuse women. Koran 4.2.24 permits the genocidal rape of married captives. How can such an amoral deity by authentic?
St. Manuel II Palaiologos says
And this is how Islam wins.
Islam will appeal to the base instincts of the human person. Leftists, people in Hollywood, Harvey Weinstein, feminists, millennials, and tell them “God sanctions your behavior”
Works every time.
MFritz says
Just look where most people in Western countries convert to islam – in prison. Criminals who need an empowering ideology.
In this regard it eminds me very much of the Nazis, where the most fanatic ones were either indoctrinated youth – or convicted criminals.
gravenimage says
The idea that these people are converting to Islam en mass is quite mistaken.
Karina says
The Independent…another disgusting anti-West source of propaganda….
Warren Raymond says
Saudi investor buys significant stake in the Independent
Sultan Muhammad Abuljadayel’s deal, which sees him take a stake of between 25% and 50%, values the holding company at more than £100m
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/jul/29/saudi-investor-buys-up-significant-stake-in-the-independent?CMP=share_btn_fb
gravenimage says
But most of their readers–check out the comments on this story–are pretty savvy about Islam. I was glad to see it!
abu says
When non muslim females (and also males) become slaves owned by muslims, then they are halal for their owners so there is no more sexual scandal when the muslims are abusing and raping their slaves. This must be what Qasim Rashid means,
mortimer says
QUESTION: HOW IS IMITATING A SEX ADDICT MOHAMMED GOING TO STOP SEX ADDICTION?
“The prophet did not die till all women were permitted him”
– (According to Ibn Sa’ad, Kitab Al Tabaqat Al Kubra, v.8, 194).
https://stepfeed.com/a-muslim-preacher-was-accused-of-sexting-and-people-have-mixed-reactions-0859
“Muslim preacher Nouman Ali Khan accused of ‘sexting’ … and people have mixed reactions”
Nouman Ali Khan is also accused of threatening women
John Forbes says
JUST TRY TELLING THAT TO THE VICTIMS OF THE MUSLIM GROUP FAMILY & FRIEND GROUPS IN THE UK !
BEATINGS , RAPES & DRUG ADDICTION & TERROR ARE THE ORDER OF THE DAY & THE POLICE & COUNCILS COVERED THIS UP FOR OVER TWO DECADES !
THIS IDEOLOGY IS TOTALLY TOXIC WHERE EVER IT APPEARS ANYWHERE NEAR NON BELIEVERS ON ANY CONTINENT !
Donafugata says
Of course, izslum can help.
There will continue to be plenty of soxual abuse but it won’t be a scandal, just normal muzlim male entitlement.
Jim Fuscaldo says
Question: If Rashid is an Amadi Muslim, then it would seem he doesn’t accept or follow the teachings of Mohammad. Mohammedan Muslims consider Amadi Muslims as apostates. Amadi Muslims proselytize non violence but fail to explain to the “nonbelievers” their differences with the teachings of Mohammad. The media and “nonbelievers” don’t know the difference, so they become unwilling and ignorant co- conspirators in promulgating the false narrative the Islam is a religion of peace.
Warren Raymond says
This might help explain why brother Qasim gets a soapbox from the very Islamophile Independent:
Saudi investor buys significant stake in the Independent
Sultan Muhammad Abuljadayel’s deal, which sees him take a stake of between 25% and 50%, values the holding company at more than £100m
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/jul/29/saudi-investor-buys-up-significant-stake-in-the-independent?CMP=share_btn_fb
mortimer says
ISLAMIC RAPE IN PAKISTAN PROTECTED BY ISLAM – DNA EVIDENCE INADMISSIBLE
Rape in Pakistan came to international attention after the politically sanctioned rape of Mukhtaran Bibi.[1][2] The group War Against Rape (WAR) has documented the severity of rape in Pakistan, and the police indifference to it.[3] According to Women’s Studies professor Shahla Haeri, rape in Pakistan is “often institutionalized and has the tacit and at times the explicit approval of the state”.[4][5] According to lawyer Asma Jahangir, who is a co-founder of the women’s rights group Women’s Action Forum, up to seventy-two percent of women in custody in Pakistan are physically or sexually abused.
Minorities
The rape and assault of Christian, Hindu, Sikh and other minorities is reported to be prevalent in Pakistan. Inaction, refusal to file complaints, intimidation and corruption amongst the police and judiciary are also frequent problems.
Honour killings, burnings, and rapes in Pakistan can be seen as indicating inadequate legal protection for women.
On 29 May 2013, the Council of Islamic Ideology, a constitutional body responsible for giving legal advice on Islamic issues to the Government of Pakistan and the Parliament, declared that DNA tests are not admissible as the main evidence in rape cases.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_in_Pakistan
Crystal says
More deception from Islam. Yet again they devil’s in the details. It all gets down to how they define words; they have a different dictionary that us. All this supposed Islamic moral high ground does not apply to kafirs, that is anyone who is not a dedicated, loyal, true Islamist. The kafirs can be raped at leisure.
Crystal says
This is Islam exposed:
http://news.sky.com/story/ex-hostage-says-taliban-linked-extremists-killed-baby-daughter-11079748
Captive’s wife was raped by Islamist terrorists. So much for no scandal.
abad says
Islam is Amoral
gravenimage says
Islam is *immoral*.
gravenimage says
Muslim spokesman Qasim Rashid claims Islam can “help us prevent more sexual abuse scandals”
……………………
This is only true if you don’t consider rape and the keeping of sex slaves to be “sexual abuse”.
Or perhaps what he means is that this is not a scandal in Islam. Certainly, the media would not be critical of this in a Muslim society.
Sarah says
Ugh. I do not give a rat’s arse if he says he is Ahmayddia Muslim or Sunni, or Shiite or any other strain.
He is a Muslim. That’s the extent of it
He is a lying, deceitful, violent, nasty little sadistic waste of space.
gravenimage says
All true. The Ahmadi regularly spout apologia for the savagery of Islam.
I wonder about leftists says
Quasim, you believe this all what you wrote, i can’t believe this, it really made me laugh, but you still are dangerous. And you have to help us? God, help us !!!
And now on top of everything else we have to start grading the graveyards day and night and take notes of who dies everyday? Till 6 hrs after dying. How sinister, totally sickening without respect.
There must have been a sick , very sick brain who wrote a book for himself to excuse his whole sickness, but he did not want to be so sick by himself so he wrote it for other people to really become sick with him,
and they fell for it, with all the consequences for you all after that. Can’t you think for yourself?
Don’t you see HOW Sickening this is?