We see it virtually every time there is a jihad attack in the West: the political and media establishment, joined here by law enforcement, act as if Muslims were the victims. A visitor from outer space would read Sgt. David Jones’ message and get the impression that a racist, bigoted “Islamophobe” had attacked Somali refugees.
When will there be any solicitude for the victims of jihad, any determination from protect them from jihad attacks?
(Thanks to Blazing Cat Fur.)
VRWC member77 says
sgt david jones <———YOU ARE A RACIST ISLAMOPHOBIC PUNK !!!!………….by virtue of your putrid racist assumptions that all Somalis are black muslims.
BY THE WAY RACIST SGT JONES, MUHAMMUD WAS A RACIST WHO PREFERED WHITE SLAVES OVER BLACK SLAVES
James says
A massive “backlash” against the Mudslimes is exactly what is needed, early and often and always.
They are murderous scumbags, and enablers of murdering scumbaggery, and of many other crimes. One of the purposes of the “pillar” named zakat is to finance such crimes. What other religion has a basic principle that is intended for that purpose Being a total bastard to unbelievers is essential to Islam – only total scumbags go to Wally Snackbar’s paedophile orgy in Heaven; Muzz who are decent human beings have only Hellfire to look forward to.
And people are supposed not to react ? For that is what that man is saying. If they don’t react now, their fury against Islam will be all the more terrible when at long last it boils over. God help the appeasers of sand-Nazism when that happens, because that day will be very ugly.
Douglas J Light says
“Backlashes” against Islam would need not be feared if it were not for the increasingly numerous “lashes” that Islam inflicts on innocent people.
gravenimage says
Right–because civilized Infidels are the ones who are “really” violent…
carol says
We don’t see nary a hint of backlash (did some complacent, pollyanna Canadian look sideways at a Muslim and I missed it?).
Muslims appear to be PLACEHOLDERS in our blessedly free and benevolent society. They must recognize and abandon any evil baggage while they have the chance.
Future generations do not need the endless conflict and alienation from their natural God-given beauty that Islam seeks to displace.
mortimer says
Sgt Jones will buy you a coffee if you say you are a Muslim. “Coffee with a Cop: 11660 104Ave NW, Edmonton AB T5K 2T7
Tell him you support Al Qaeda supremacism and he will buy you coffee and a donut.
Tell him you don’t like Al Qaeda and he will put handcuffs on you.
gravenimage says
Sgt, Jones is apparently known for his sense of humor–if only he was joking here.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/edmonton-police-twitter-jokes-1.4265046
paul says
He wants to marry your 6 year old
paul says
he is a muslim and wants you to accept all the murders as your fault
Edward Paul Campbell says
I absolutely agree with you about ‘black Somalis’. One should not exclude the other 0.01 percent who might be white Jehovah’s Witness pioneers in deep cover (aka ‘religious terrorists’), with heavy, dark makeup, and sunglasses to cover their blue eyes…
Religion in Somalia 2010
Religion Percent
Islam[1]
99.9%
Other[1]
0.1%
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Somalia
mortimer says
Yeah? That cop should be worried about the safety of POLICE OFFICERS and members of the public who may be attacked at any second by JIHADISTS.
“Jihad is holy fighting in Allah’s Cause with full force of numbers and weaponry. It is given the utmost importance in Islam and is one of its pillars. By Jihad Islam is established, Allah’s Word is made superior (which means only Allah has the right to be worshiped), and Islam is propagated. By abandoning Jihad Islam is destroyed and Muslims fall into an inferior position; their honor is lost, their lands are stolen, their rule and authority vanish. Jihad is an obligatory duty in Islam on every Muslim. He who tries to escape from this duty, or does not fulfill this duty, dies as a hypocrite.” – ‘official’ definition of jihad from footnotes on p.39, ‘The Noble Koran’, published by King Fahd Complex for Publication of the Quran, Madinah, KSA.
Dum Spiro says
Of course they have to push this narrative until M-103 can quickly lead to laws to take care of any public “Islamophobia” reactions, unless enough Canadians wake up now and smell the coffee to push back and prevent that whole of government approach to quell their current rights and free speech…
— Spero
Westman says
Islam is a house divided both against itself and the unbelievers. It is unwilling to clean house and calls the unbelievers who resist the violent vein of the house, “islamophobes and racists”, thereby protecting the very violent strain of Islam that it claims is, “not Islam”.
To insist that Islam solve its internal violence is like trying to break up a fight of a married couple. The interloper merely becomes the common enemy.
Cunamarra says
I don’t think Islam is as divided as you seem to think. I think the apologists who appear non-violent and the Jihadist soldiers work in tandem and compliment each other.
Our ancestors were like this in our past conflicts. Our World War II military was supported materially by moms and dads, wives, sisters and brothers working in the factories and farms to keep the nation going and to supply them with everything they needed on the front. The Americans living in America, not deployed to the front, were still supporting the nation’s war effort and warriors morally, ideologically, and logistically. Our ancestors also understood this to be the case with our enemies and did not hesitate to punish them for being supporters of their own war machine.
It is we who are divided now and we who are failing.
mortimer says
Cunamarra, Islam is united at the top by strongman dictatorships, but not at the bottom. The unity within the different schools of Islam, comes from the collegiality of the sheikhs. Alliances within Islam are temporary at best. A Muslim knows that another Muslim is likely to use taqiyya. The loyalty of most Muslims, therefore extends no further than loyalty to one’s clan. This makes wider alliances very ineffectual. ‘Islam’ is an ideology interpreted by most Muslims as a world-conquest political movement motivated by faith, but they will not march unless there is an inspiring leader, such as Osama bin Laden or Caliph al-Baghdadi or Anwar Awlaki. Most wannabe jihadists are waiting to be recruited and a small number (much less than 1%) are being recruited. Only 15% of Muslims are in favor of jihad terrorism. Another 45% of Muslims want to promote Sharia through lawfare.
paul says
lets hear it for m103: Hip hip BURN!
Andy says
The magic word always is RACIST
FINALLY…ABSOLUTE PROOF…of WHITE RACISM!!!
(Or is it BLACK RACISM?)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JqS2Uqt1N5k
Lloyd Miller says
We have to make the authorities as frighten of us as they are of Muslims. USE THE BALLOT BOX! Vote for not a single DEM(agogue) nor RINO ever! Insist on prosecuting everyone in the pay of Muslim moneybags!
paul says
start with Turdeau
Mick Wiseman says
Sgt. Jones has about as much grey matter as a Fruit Fly.
Tonton Macoute says
The fruit fly’s neurons probably fire much faster. The benefit of lean management.
Save Europe says
The same old excrement being espoused EVERY time, post ALL Muslim acts of violence in Western Countries – don’t let there be a backlash against Muslims in the West. Answer? There NEVER is!!! We ARE civilised people! They NEVER ‘police’ their religion, neither call out, march against nor publicly denounce (en mass) EVERY Jihadi after every atrocity. Thus, they are complicit through their silence.
John D.Alder says
They are completely insane ! The authorities and lying media have proven themselves to be the enemies of the people they are sworn to defend ! Soon enough the fear of resisting will wear off and the sellout politicians will really have something to tremble about !
Lydia says
Oh, what a tragedy!!!
We can’t have more disdain for muslims!!!
What a crime that would be!
I mean, never mind that they go around terror bombing the whole world, but we can’t suffer them to undergo any “backlash” (gasp!!!) !!!
That would be unthinkable!
: O
(sarcasm intended)
James says
What that means is, that there must never ever be consequences for these crimes. And that will re-inforce the Muslim perception that non-Muslims can and must take their bad stuff without complaint. It will re-inforce their supremacism. A backlash is very badly needed, for the good of Muslims as well for ours.
paul says
love the Canadian minister of immigration, a muslim… What could go wrong?
http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/department/minister/index.asp
Ahmed Hussen is the Member of Parliament for the riding of York South-Weston. A lawyer and social activist, he has a proven track record of leadership and community empowerment.
Born and raised in Somalia, …
Bezelel says
Sympathy for the devil.
Georg says
“A visitor from outer space would read Sgt. David Jones’ message and get the impression that a racist, bigoted “Islamophobe” had attacked Somali refugees.”
Thank you, thank you, thank you. We are in the midst of a zero-sum game (not “game” in the colloquial sense, but strategic sense) where one culture (multi/Islamo) or narrative is in competition with another whereby Muslims actually *gain* upon a Muslim-perpetrated attack and non-Muslims are shamed. What should be needless to say is that *we* are victimized not once but *twice* upon each attack. Despite its absurdity, it is sadly an intelligent and well-thought-out strategy whose efficacy demands pushback toward justice and reality. We must:
Stand for our West. For our children. For posterity. For what is right. For what is good. It is our Moral Duty. Against evil. This, is Islamonausea (NOT “Islamophobia”).
James says
An enlightening post. Thanks 🙂
mortimer says
Georg has described the situation perfectly! Sgt Jones appears to be tasked OFFICIALLY by Edmonton police to do ‘COMMUNITY RELATIONS’ with Muslims.
Translation: he sucks up to Muslims and says ANYTHING that they like to hear, so that they will cooperate with police and rat out members of their own community who break the law.
Sgt Jones appears to be a British transplant who buys coffees for Muslims and chats them up so they will trust the police, whom they do not trust in any Muslim country, since they are so taqiyya-ridden, political and corrupted by bribery in their home countries.
Sgt Jones is being paid to slander the white tax payers who pay his rich salary.
gravenimage says
Spot on.
utis says
My present attitude toward muslim “fears” about retaliation, is that — if these fears are not pretense — they are projections of what muslims would do to people in their country-of-origin, who attacked or even allegedly attacked muslims. Just look to India for muslim lynch mob actions.
Instead of nurturing and encouraging muslim anxieties, the media should practice honest journalism, and just keep a body-count of number of kufr attacked by muslims vs. number of muslims attacked by kufr. If the media don’t have the courage to publish the count, they should at least circulate it among themselves, just to remind them what honestly looks like.
Tonton Macoute says
Well said. The surge of ideological thinking – nay, pure superstition in the West considers factual correctness a “heresy. The age of reason seems to come to an end I’m afraid .
mortimer says
People are TRUTH-O-PHOBIC and FACT-O-PHOBIC. They prefer to hear soothing platitudes that allow them to remain inactive and lazy.
dumbledoresarmy says
You wrote – “My present attitude toward muslim “fears” about retaliation, is that — if these fears are not pretense — they are projections of what muslims would do to people in their country-of-origin, who attacked or even allegedly attacked muslims”.
Exactly. I reached the same conclusion a long time ago, myself. They are *projecting*.
mortimer says
Agree with Utis: “psychological projection”. They are assuming their own ‘REVENGE’ or ‘RETALIATION’ or ‘RETRIBUTION’ doctrine is active in Western people. But in reality, Western people believe in forgiveness to an extreme degree!
gravenimage says
True, utis.
MFritz says
#NotARealCop
mortimer says
MFritz: Sgt Jones is an officially tasked ‘community relations officer’ whose job is to pander.
Saleem Smith says
The jihad attack that took place early today in Edmonton unfortunately had everything to do with Islam. There are dozens of verses in the Qur’an that state that the Qur’an is a perfectly clear book that ought to be obeyed and that Muhammad the prophet of Islam is the model man for human conduct.
This is obviously a recipe for disaster and non-Muslims ought to be very cautious when it comes to matters related to Islam and Islamic immigration.
We ex-Muslims living with Islam’s formal and informal death penalty for apostasy know that Mohammedanism is terribly dangerous and harmful fraud.
Qur’an 009:029:
‘Fight against such of those to whom the Scriptures were given as believe neither in God nor the Last Day, who do not forbid what God and His Apostle have forbidden, and who do not embrace the true Faith, until they pay tribute out of hand and are utterly subdued.’
Qur’an, 033:021:
‘There is a good example in God’s apostle for those of you who look to God and the Last Day and remember God always.’
Here is a recent statement from a group of Bangladeshi apostates living in the UK explaining the reasons why they have abandoned Islam:
“One who claims to be a messenger of God is expected to live a saintly life. He must not be given to lust, he must not be a sexual pervert, and he must not be a rapist, a highway robber, a war criminal, a mass murderer or an assassin. One who claims to be a messenger of God must have a superior character. He must stand above the vices of the people of his time. Yet Muhammad’s life is that of a gangster godfather. He raided merchant caravans, looted innocent people, massacred entire male populations and enslaved the women and children. He raped the women captured in war after killing their husbands and told his followers that it is okay to have sex with their captives (Qur’an 33:50). He assassinated those who criticized him and executed them when he came to power and became de facto despot of Arabia. Muhammad was bereft of human compassion. He was an obsessed man with his dreams of grandiosity and could not forgive those who stood in his way…
The statement continues,
Muhammad was a narcissist, like Hitler, Saddam or Stalin. He was astute and knew how to manipulate people, but his emotional intelligence was less evolved than that of a 6-year-old child. He simply could not feel the pain of others. He brutally massacred thousands of innocent people and pillaged their wealth. His ambitions were big and as a narcissist he honestly believed he is entitled to do as he pleased and commit all sorts of crimes and his evil deeds are justified.”
Terry Gain says
Thank you. Islam is a fraud and is more dangerous than communism and Nazism. The best solution is to exclude them from civilized society. No Muslim is forced to support this miserable excuse for a religion. Apostates unite. You have nothing to lose but the insanity.
James says
Mohammed sounds very like Joseph Smith. Given the violence they both got up to, one might think people in the US were rather well-equipped to under Smith’s Arabian forerunner.
gravenimage says
This is no accident, James. Joseph Smith said “I Will Be a Second Mohammed”, and based some of Mormonism on Islam, including polygamy and the murder of apostates.
Luckily, mainstream Mormonism practices neither of these horrors today.
Would that that were true of Islam itself.
mortimer says
Thank you, Saleem! The Edmonton jihadist was implementing the modus operandi of ISIS.
Danforth says
With apologies to “New York. New York and Frank Sinatra”, if you can make it in Edmonton, You can make it anywhere. Just how close to home does this have to get before we finally wake up? Does a car or truck careening down a sidewalk towards you bring you into the real world?
Is your town or city next on their list? Justin is letting thousands in illegally with virtually no vetting at all! And giving them checks in the thousands to boot. Immigration hearings are now forecast be to at least two years down the road. Idiocy!
I humbly suggest all elections at all levels of government specifically exclude any Muslims or those sympathetic to Islam from the ballot. At least not until they firmly denounce publicly their opposition to the takeover of any Western jurisdiction by force or stealth.
I fear we are too late.
Al says
Here’s hoping that we don’t retaliate against those who want us dead. That would only give a greater push for M103.
That after all, is the goal.
Danforth says
Hey Al,
“Here’s hoping that we don’t retaliate”???? Not retaliating will INSURE our death. What kind of submissive remark is that? Are you afraid of M103 that much that speaking out against the ideology of Islam will bring more charges of Islamophobia down on you?
We need more people who will speak up, not shut up.
Fatts says
Who the fuck is Sgt. David Jones? If a faggot like this is really in a position of authority anywhere in Canada it does not bode well for the good people of that nation.
Somali muslims are the damn enemy and Canucks and the rest of us cannot deride them enough in either written or spoken work. Here in the U.S. I favor being rid of every last Somali muslim on our territory. One way or the other.
Islam is a pile of shit. Somali muslims are worse than shit flies. Get rid of them!
mortimer says
Fatts, Muslims are human beings with human rights equal to yours and they are entitled to equal protection of the law. We are in the position of fighting not just the ideology of Islam, but huge financial consortiums which pander to Muslims. Those consortiums are a greater threat to freedom. You should be more concerned about youtube, facebook and google which are all trying to restrict our freedom to criticize Islam.
gravenimage says
Mortimer, we should not have to import hordes of Muslims in the name of human rights, just as we did not have to import active Nazi Party members during WWII.
Ruby says
Canada free press is asking this question and maybe we need to think this over and realize that Islam is NOT a true religion..it is a foreign governemnT a political totalitarian system..?? https://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fcanadafreepress.com%2Farticle%2Fislam-is-not-a-religion-it-is-foreign-law&h=ATPMtQ6IK-MPb9pBuM1cvGh_E5u8H1Dyl_fP_g15TGMXhf8v6Re5pT-Q47BBWpUFfH3XqfIsLV7Am_24DsFEz0BLGJBqtMgbf3Sm-tAlbS6oJ2mLaC745XFBM5mLDZ1yygAyIAE
TL says
False dichotomy. A creed can be both a religion AND a totalitarian political system. Materialist humanism is an example of this. In fact, no religion worth adhering to would fail to specify principles of political organization. This is necessary to establish coherent society which can perpetuate the religion from one generation to the next without needless ideological and institutional complexity. Progs understand this, perhaps only intuitively, so they are engaged in a long war against competing religions, even Islam.
One of the major defects of western civ at present is the widespread demand, usually hypocritical, that religion be divorced from politics. Instead, what we need is to exclude FALSE religions, e.g. Abrahamism and egalitarian humanism, from political power. This is an absolutely necessary requirement to stabilize ourselves, but it means, of course, that the equality clause of the Declaration of Independence must be rejected. As usual, the USA and its cliches about liberty are not a part of the solution but a part of the problem. So also is its precious phrase, “We the People”, which implies the ridiculous idea that everyone among “the People” have authority to rule and to establish a complex government. But how can children and antirational adults have authority to rule their neighbors if they do not have competency to rule their own siblings and parents? To cope with the Constitutionalists’ sophistry you would need to add in some more sophisty about children and adult antirationalists not being “People”.
gravenimage says
Avowed Fascist TL wrote:
One of the major defects of western civ at present is the widespread demand, usually hypocritical, that religion be divorced from politics. Instead, what we need is to exclude FALSE religions, e.g. Abrahamism and egalitarian humanism, from political power.
……………………….
Of course, neither “Abrahamism” nor “egalitarian humanism” are religions.
By “Abrahamism” TL likely means Christianity, which he also calls “Trinitarianism”, which he despises. On the other hand, he may be pretending that Judaism and Christianity are just as the same as Islam–he has done this before, as well.
And with “egalitarian humanism” he likely means democracy and human rights, both of which he has said before he hates.
More:
This is an absolutely necessary requirement to stabilize ourselves, but it means, of course, that the equality clause of the Declaration of Independence must be rejected. As usual, the USA and its cliches about liberty are not a part of the solution but a part of the problem.
……………………….
*Of course* TL hates the Declaration of Independence and the nation that grew from it. After all, we dared oppose Hitler.
More:
So also is its precious phrase, “We the People”, which implies the ridiculous idea that everyone among “the People” have authority to rule and to establish a complex government. But how can children and antirational adults have authority to rule their neighbors if they do not have competency to rule their own siblings and parents? To cope with the Constitutionalists’ sophistry you would need to add in some more sophisty about children and adult antirationalists not being “People”.
……………………….
Of course, children do not have the vote–it is ludicrous for TL to pretend that they do.
Also, notice TL’s disturbing comments about individuals “ruling” their siblings and parents. He has *no* concept of the individual, nor of the rights of the individual.
Tresha S. says
If you are so worried about backlash, oh peaceful Muslims, start speaking up against Muslim jihad before, when, and after it happens!
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
Why should they. There is silence before and when it happens, and the Infidel elites do the talking after. In their silence Moslems are made to appear as being patient with out of control Infidel rabble rousers, which in turn shuts down free speech on the matter.
dumbledoresarmy says
If they were *really* worried about ‘backlash’ – even if that fear were simply because of their expectation that the Infidels will do to them what *they*, if the situations were reversed, would do to any infidels they could get hold of – they would be hightailing it outta the west in *droves*, as fast as they could fly.
They’re not… so all their wailing and victim theatre is fake.
dumbledoresarmy says
I should add that, right now, what is happening is a quiet flight of NON-MUSLIMS from heavily-Islamised regions of the UK… and indeed, many non-Muslim Britons are *leaving Britain*.
Jews are fleeing from *France* – and from other european countries – primarily because of the relentless – and escalating – aggression and threats of… MUSLIMS within Europe.
So the *reality* is that *non-Muslims* are fleeing because of MUSLIMS, even from those very same countries where the Muslims continually wail and whine about ‘Islamophobia’ and ‘backlash’. Whilst those Muslims, despite their whining and wailing, are.. STAYING PUT. Which they wouldn’t be doing if they *really* felt they were in any danger.
gravenimage says
Exactly, DDA. But not only are they not leaving, but millions more Muslims are flooding into the West.
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
There are benefits to the counter-intuitive rule that every jihad mass murder attack in Dar al-Harb be responded to by globo-socialist elites calling for an end to Islamophobia:
1) Doing so directly implies that it’s the victims’ fault,
2) The influx can continue unabated, delivering more voters to solidify the hold of the elites on a country,
3) Attacking the victim as the source of the problem further reduces the already small chance that the infidel populace will learn the truth about Islam.
That’s why victim blaming has been a uniform response to all jihad mass murder attacks in Dar al-Harb. The linchpin of this successful strategy is ignoring the contents and history of Islam itself. Ignorance is something that comes easily to globo-socialists, also known as liberals or progressives.
It’s a winning formula that at this point seems irreversible. If it works for a mass murder of 100 infidels, it surely will work when the number becomes a 1,000, 10,000, 100,000 or 1 million.
Flavius Claudius Iulianus says
https://www.facebook.com/ElectConservativesIn2019/photos/a.1606426796276097.1073741829.1601956053389838/1893004204285020/?type=3&theater
TL says
Do you understand why that is so funny? If Canada is ruined already, then cuckservatism has already demonstrated its worthlessness. Only a dog would go back to that vomit aka conservatism.
Flavius Claudius Iulianus says
Yes I understand why it is funny. Secondly, Canada isn’t ruined, Trudeau isn’t that smart.
The rest of your comment if full of juvenile nonsense.
gravenimage says
TL hates Conservatism. His only words of praise here have been for Fascism.
Chris Malan says
If there’s anybody who deserves this, it’s the Muslim loving Canadians. Note, Muslim loving Canadians, Not all Canadians. They should watch this right to the end: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7QRiKIc9vM
Cunamarra says
People of Color? I haven’t met anyone yet who sees that the one common denominator of terrorism is a level of melanin in the skin. I am unaware of anyone becoming more prone to terrorism after tanning too long. I suppose anything to divert attention from the content of the mind and ideology that motivates someone, and any opportunity to point out that the common denominator of Americans is racism should be taken advantage of.
Cunamarra says
I suppose I should say North Americans, lest I betray my jingoism toward those peculiar folk to the north.
R Cole says
Notice Muslims always say they are “worried” about their safety, in the aftermath of an Islamic attack. And notice how the police almost prostrate themselves, and can’t bow low enough to serve them. However, if any non-Muslim says they’re “worried” about an Islamic attack, the same police, would treat them as criminals.
There’s a clear message, Muslims can worry about their safety following an Islamic attack. But it is borderline illegal to express concern in the same way, for your safety, even as a terrorist attack has just occurred and is far more likely to occur.
Obviously, police are being trained to malign their own culture. That in the face of Islamic terrorism, are taught to view western society as the real threat.
This cop can show empathy towards Muslims [notice he throws in people of color, careful to check every PC box, but if it’s about terrorism it’s about Muslims/Islam ], but if the people he grew up with, his friends and neighbors, were to express similar worries as his Somali friend, saying they’re similarly worried for their families’ safety, to the police, that’s hate speech, an act of racism or Islamophobia, where in Canada you may face arrest.
::
That the Somalian worries about the Christians attacking him, that’s not racism, for the police, but when those worries are reversed, it is.
detolerable says
There should be no backlash against Muslims; it is critical to immediately BAN islam as a violent cult that distributes a so-called “Holy Book” that calls for violence and should be prosecuted as Hate Crimes and RICO conspiracy.
Ban guns from mosques… disarm terrorism suporters.
gravenimage says
Post-jihad attack, Edmonton cop warns against “backlashes against people of colour and Muslims”
……………………
We *always* hear this–Muslims murder Infidels; Infidel authorities wring their hands over a phantom backlash against Muslims; focus shifts from Muslims murdering us to Muslims being the victims of “islamophobes”–even thought this does not happen.
I am heartily sick of this kabuki theater.