Books that sanction domestic violence and say women should never refuse their husbands sex are among a series of sexist materials that inspectors have found in Britain’s Islamic schools. The education watchdog has compiled a file of the worst examples.
Britain now has a two-tier legal system. Over 84 Sharia courts are beyond the reach of British law, and are sending women back home to the most abusive situations that would never have been tolerated by a British court. It has also been recently discovered that 60% of Muslim marriages are not legal in the UK; now, instead of correcting this perplexing tolerance of the intolerable, instead there are calls for British law to recognize Muslim marriages.
Chances are that this troubling news about the discovery of books teaching youngsters that beating wives for refusal of sex is okay will disappear with no followup action. Brits are doomed to see their nation slip further into acceptance of abusive sharia norms.
“Beating wives if they refuse sex is OK, according to books in Britain’s Islamic schools”, RT News, November 28, 2017:
Books that sanction domestic violence and say women should never refuse their husbands sex are among a series of sexist materials that inspectors have found in Britain’s Islamic schools. The education watchdog has compiled a file of the worst examples.
The Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills (Ofsted) discovered a book in a school library entitled ‘Women Who Deserve to Go to Hell’, which said it was wrong for wives to show “ingratitude to their husband” or “have tall ambitions,” according to the Times. It also detailed “mischievous” females who are a “trial for men.” In its pages, pupils are told: “In the beginning of the 20th century, a movement for the freedom of women was launched with the basic objective of driving women towards aberrant ways.”
Another school Ofsted visited encouraged children to read a text that contrasted the “noble women of the East” who protects her modesty by wearing a veil, while the “internally torn woman of the West” attracts men and leaves her home to hang around in cinemas and cafés.
Other materials claimed that in a Muslim marriage “the wife is not allowed to refuse sex to her husband” or “leave the house where she lives without his permission.” Boys and girls were also taught that “the man by way of correction can also beat her.” Work marked by teachers stated that women had a responsibility “only to bear children and bring them up as Muslims.”
The social attitudes contained in the library books appear to have filtered through to children’s work. Ofsted inspectors found a student answered on a worksheet suggesting women have a responsibility “only to bear children and bring them up as Muslims” while men should be “protectors of women.” In a box headed “daily life and relationships” the pupil had written that men are “physically stronger” and women are “emotionally weaker.” The worksheet was covered in approving red ticks from the teacher.
Ofsted said the books and writings made for “uncomfortable reading.” It added that the material it collected was out of step with mainstream Muslim thinking, and came from maintained schools as well as independent faith schools and unregistered schools.
The education watchdog took issue in particular with primary schools which allow girls as young as four to wear the hijab. It said there is a “growing concern” about the trend. Inspectors are now planning to question Muslim girls who wear the hijab at primary school, because most Islamic teaching does not require girls to cover their heads until they reach puberty…
samdav7 says
he he .. beating wives in Islam is OK even if the food she cooked is a bit salty 😀
Michael Copeland says
Undermining and subverting: this is how it is done.
mortimer says
Agree. The excuse of ‘religion’ is used to justify the removal of the human rights and civil liberties of women. The removal of these rights basic rights of all citizens is purely POLITICAL and means the virtual enslavement of these women under abusive men.
Bob Smyth says
“Ofsted said the books and writings made for “uncomfortable reading.” It added that the material it collected was out of step with mainstream Muslim thinking, and came from maintained schools as well as independent faith schools and unregistered schools.”
HOW does Ofsted KNOW that the material is, “out of step with mainstream Muslim thinking”?
It sounds very MAINSTREAM.
Were Ofsted “helped” to reach this conclusion?
If so, by WHOM?
mortimer says
Bill Maher famously said, “Islam is the mother lode of bad ideas.”
The following list is substantial support for his claim.
34 BAD IDEAS IN ISLAM: 1 No Golden Rule 2 No free speech 3 No democracy 4 Jihad – holy war of supremacism 5 Honour killings 6 Taqiyya – sacred lying 7 Taqlid – group think 8 Circular reasoning 9 Misogyny – repression of women 10 Rape of kafirs as jihad prizes 11 Genocide 12 Ethnic cleansing 13 Al-Walaa wal-Baraa – Islamic apartheid 14 Torture 15 Plundering 16 Cruel and unusual punishments 16 Backwardness – stagnation 17 Violence against women 18 Slavery 19 Discriminatory Sharia law 20 Hatred of the arts 21 No music 22 Pedophilia disguised as child marriage 23 Fifty generations of cousin marriage and genetic defects 24 Cruelty to animals 25 Extortion tax to humiliate disbelievers 26 No historic basis 27 Anti-intellectual obscurantism 28 FGM 29 Arab racism 30 Theocratic totalitarianism 31 Vigilantism 32 Amoral, opportunistic character of Mohammed that all Muslims must imitate 33 Hatred of non-Muslims as an essential doctrine 34 History of Islam includes the genocidal murders of 270 million non-Muslims in Islamic holy wars, terrorism, persecutions and enslavement directed against non-Muslims.
Wellington says
Indeed, mortimer, an infamous list. But mentioning such a list in many places (e.g., Stanford) would get you branded a hater of the first degree (or actually barred from the UK as Robert Spencer has been). Thus does Islam continue to hide behind its religious veil, aided in our time by truly woeful Western dhimmis, who sadly and ominously include actual leaders like Pope Francis I, Justin Trudeau, Theresa May and Angela Merkel.
AvantiBev says
One cannot love The Good without hating that which is evil.
Wellington says
I agree.
Corax says
Not to mention Barack Obama
gravenimage says
Fine posts, Mortimer, Wellington, and AvantiBev.
Charles says
Is that Britain’s “Satanic Schools”?
That exist solely to teach children the Laws of SATAN? Which is the “god” muslims worship!
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
Let’s show some understanding here: slapping around your wife if she refuses to put out is the law. Much like the Constitution governs all federal and state laws in this country, the Holy Ko-Ran governs Shariah laws. But there are a few questions:
1) What about married homosexuals? Does the Holy Ko-Ran let a guy beat his man if he won’t give him any?
2) Why won’t the Moslima put out for her husband, is he that bad in bed?
3) Does the Holy Ko-Ran allow marital rape?
Aardvark says
Married homosexuals have to take turns throwing each other off the roof.
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
That’s tough duty. Ouch.
Benedict says
If a woman like this:
https://toklandet.wordpress.com/2014/10/03/alice-bah-kunke/
can be a Minister of Culture and Democracy in Sweden, a Muslim Mayor of London and Islamic books on sexual ethics in English schools becomes slightly more difficult to object to in our globalized world. Is that correct?
Jayell says
Very interesting! If you’re researching our Prime Minister and you type in ‘Teresa May’ (without the ‘h’) you might be in for a similar surprise. However, that would definitely have been a mistake – which is not to say Theresa May (wIth the ‘h’) as Prime Minister is not also a mistake. The Great Khan of London Town sneaked his way into City Hall on the backs of the votes of the Labour Party (no more said!) and ‘Londoners’ whose ancestors were living a few thousand miles away when Herr Hitler was entertaining the City with his firework displays (but might have welcomed the total destruction of St.Paul’s Cathedral in order to replace it with a mosque?). I’m surprised about the Islamic book on sexual ethics in English Schools; in fact, the juxtaposition of ‘islam’ and ‘ethics’ seems very odd. Do they even realise that the word ‘ethics’ exists, or perhaps they might have thought that it was an English county name pronounced with a speech impediment – assuming that they even bothered to learn that England has counties!
Vyx says
I bet that questioning the book, the teachings and even questioning islam is islamophobic and will get you in trouble for hate speech in london.
In retrospect, things might have been very different if Hitler saw to it that Germans were a minority and that criticizing the German government was hate speech.
Benedict says
Jayell: I don’t know if “a similar surprise” in your comment is a hint that you take for granted that my post is a joke?
Alice Bah Kuhnke:
http://www.regeringen.se/sveriges-regering/kulturdepartementet/alice-bah-kuhnke/
is really the Swedish Minister for Culture and Democracy and not “the Minister for Pole and Lap dancing” as a funny American guy commented on an earlier post.
Westman says
I read some of her Stasi attitude that employers of 25 or more should be forced to keep records, and to give active education to combat discrimination or abuse of women, even if none ever occurs. The financial weight of Islam is not enough. There really is a totalitarian inside of this liberal, screaming to get out.
Meanwhile, Sweden’s ship already hit the Islam iceberg and Alice Bah Kuhnkehe is shuffling the deck chairs in complete denial of the true situation. The local Mosque and Muslim schools are busy teaching girls to be baby factories, sex objects, and to expect a beating, “for allah”.
DFD says
We have in Britain by now approx 200 sharia courts, (Christian Institute, I believe, could have been reported on another Christian website) We definitely surpassed the 90 mark about 2 years ago. When sharia-May took over the home office there were about 24 sharia courts, again, an estimate.
I then promoted actively a campaign to petition against sharia courts. Fat chance. I had good help though from Zak’s website
DFD says
PS: Zak’s site (US): http://www.citizenwarrior.com/
Together we managed several thousand signatures within a few weeks. Help from other sites? Nah, they are too important…
Voytek Gagalka says
“Britain now has a two-tier legal system.”
It is only matter of time before “first tire” of this system (original British common law) will be removed and replaced fully by the “second tire” and sharia becomes the supreme and sole law of the land. The oppressive tongs are choking Britain more and more.
DFD says
Totally, utterly & completely OFF topic
But I just had to share it with you !!!
============================
After all that doom and gloom, something for a laugh – or grin. Depends on one’s sense of humor. Somehow I came across it on the net. So, ENJOY – unless you fell offended or that I am intruding. In that case, sorry.
So here it is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BsjwrA_Oo18
Benedict says
More feminists propaganda!
???
Older Canadian says
Speaking from personal experience, it appears that the PC crowd wants to revert to what it was like to be a married woman in Ontario Canada prior to mid 80’s.
Ah the good all days where a man could beat his wife with impuity unless he. permently maimed her.
To give respect to the USA this was no longer permitted in either 1963 or 1964, but not until 1983 in Ontario Canada.
These people are only a few years behind us in the western nations. Disgusting but true.
gravenimage says
Beating wives if they refuse sex is OK, according to books in Britain’s Islamic schools
………………….
Of course, this is orthodox Islam.
Britain should shut all of these vile Madrassas down.
Guest says
“Women are emotionally weak” or Muslim men are heartless and unable to love anything
gravenimage says
Yes–there is no love in Islam.
Wellington says
But, as I know you know, gravenimage, there sure is a heap of hate in Mo’s creed. A lot of submission and a heap of hurt too.
There’s a malevolent trinity for you, courtesy of Islam, i.e., hate, submission and hurt.
gravenimage says
No redeeming features.
MFritz says
You want to find out nasty things about islam on a daily basis? Just keep on reading its texts!
FYI says
islam may serve a purpose.
islam is perhaps like God’s version of Darwinian Natural Selection:to separate out,like a winnowing fan,those who follow God from those who follow the counterfeit god,allah.
It weeds out the wheat from the chaff.
The Wheat will find the true God{the Biblical version } and know and obey His Laws.
The Chaff will find allah{the koranic misrepresentation of God}and think they will be spared.
but alas…
“They will perish because they did not welcome and LOVE the truth so as to be saved”
2 thessalonians 2 v 10
islam:God’s version of Natural Selection to weed out the wheat(who follow God) from the chaff(who follow allah)
the wheat will understand the need to obey God’s Original Commandments and the importance of the Two Chief Commandments(which are missing in islam)
the chaff will put on their show of false piety and follow a creed that is violation of God’s Commandments.
Jews and Christians know who the wheat is….and who is the chaff..
What is happening in the world today ,if you can see it,is the separation of the Wheat from the chaff.
Seán Mac says
How about nagging? Is that a beating offense? I can understand having a headache.
Karina says
According to experts like Robert Spencer, as well as former Muslims such as Ayaan Hirsi Ali, the Koran legitimizes and sanctions such abuse. Therefore, I find it hard to believe that such attitudes and teachings are ‘out of step’ with the mainstream faith.
Karen says
So many problems here.
Contrasting the “noble Eastern woman” and the “torn Western woman” who hangs around like a (implied) harlot; yes, Islam is a supremacist ideology. This is an outrageous statement, and unworthy of an educational environment. This is libelous and discriminatory, and nearly as offensive as the advocacy of domestic violence and submission.
The watchdog added that “the material it collected was out of step with mainstream Muslim thinking”. Says who? The mainstream seems to be allowing the material. What is the basis for that remark, or is it a simple matter of providing cover?
The collected material comes from “maintained schools as well as independent faith schools and unregistered schools.” Unregistered schools? Why are these allowed to exist? This article from the Independent says that 57% of unregistered schools in Britain are Islamic, yet focus all its attention on the 31% that are unregistered Jewish schools, roughly half the number of Islamic schools.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/the-full-extent-of-unregistered-schools-in-england-revealed-a7586101.html