• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Donald Trump retweets videos of Muslims being violent, Labour MPs call for him to be banned from UK events

Nov 29, 2017 11:59 am By Robert Spencer

UPDATE: Dutch media is now claiming that the video purporting to show Muslim migrants bullying is a Dutch boy actually doesn’t depict any Muslim migrants. Lost in the controversy is the fact that Muslim migrants have been responsible for a crime wave across Europe.

——

The three tweets that President Trump retweeted show a Muslim migrant gang beating up a disabled Dutch boy, a Muslim smashing a statue of the Virgin Mary, and a Muslim mob pushing a boy off a roof. Sky News calls them “anti-Muslim videos,” yet if Muslims really reject jihad terror and Sharia oppression, they shouldn’t have any problem with them, as they should abhor this behavior as much as the President does. This reflexive label from Sky News shows that they know that far more Muslims than they’re willing to admit openly actually condone this kind of behavior. Metro calls the videos “Britain First propaganda,” and Sky implies that as well in writing: “The group’s deputy leader Jayda Fransen, who posted the unverified clips, claims one of them shows a Muslim destroying a statue of the Virgin Mary.”

In reality, Britain First did not originate these videos. They’ve all been circulating for a long time. The rush on the part of the British intelligentsia to condemn Trump and Britain First, rather than to address the atrocities in the videos, is all of a piece with the general Western unwillingness to address jihad terror and Sharia oppression, and instead to consign all concern for it to the realms of “Islamophobia.” This is the phenomenon I discuss in my new book Confessions of an Islamophobe — get your copy here now.

“Donald Trump retweets anti-Muslim videos posted by Britain First deputy leader,” Sky News, November 29, 2017:

Donald Trump has retweeted three anti-Muslim videos posted by far-right group Britain First.

The group’s deputy leader Jayda Fransen, who posted the unverified clips, claims one of them shows a Muslim destroying a statue of the Virgin Mary.

She claims the other two videos show attacks carried out by other Muslims.

After sharing the posts with his 43.6m Twitter followers, Mr Trump fired off three other tweets praising the US stock market, suggesting a boycott of “fake news CNN” and commenting on the sacking of NBC presenter Matt Lauer….

“MPs call for Trump ban over Britain First retweets,” by Jen Mills, Metro.co.uk, November 29, 2017:

MPs have reacted angry [sic] to Donald Trump retweeting Britain First propaganda, with some calling for him to be banned from events in the UK.

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said: ‘I hope our Government will condemn far-right retweets by Donald Trump. They are abhorrent, dangerous and a threat to our society.’

Naz Shah, Labour MP for Bradford West, said: ‘I will be writing to the Home Secretary this afternoon.

‘If a Muslim leader was found sharing extremist content – and was speaking at a conference, local councils under their duty to prevent radicalisation, would get involved and cancel the conference.

‘I think it is clear that if the President of the USA comes into this country, the Home Office might have to contact the government and request any sessions be cancelled.’

Stephen Doughty MP raised a point of order in the Commons about the ‘shocking Trump tweets’, saying there were ‘very serious concerns given content and ongoing criminal proceedings.’

Green Party MP Caroline Lucas, who said: ‘The President of the US has just retweeted a convicted British fascist. Theresa May must publicly condemn him immediately. We cannot stand by and watch Donald Trump spew this hate.’…

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: "Islamophobia", Donald Trump, Featured, journalistic bias, Leftist/Islamic Alliance, United Kingdom, Useful idiots Tagged With: Britain First, Twitter


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. mortimer says

    Nov 29, 2017 at 12:08 pm

    Trumps tweets demonstrate clearly that ALL CULTURES ARE NOT ALIKE and ALL CULTURES ARE NOT MORALLY EQUIVALENT and that ISLAM IS INHERENTLY VIOLENT.

    Leftards are not angry that Muslims do this while appealing to the authority of the Islamic source texts. They are angry that anyone should draw ATTENTION to normative Islam, since the Leftards want to claim ‘all cultures are alike’.

    Dr. Tina Magaard (PhD) studied the source texts of 10 religions and found that the Islamic source texts contain the greatest number of appeals for warfare and violence.

    • Michael Copeland says

      Nov 29, 2017 at 1:15 pm

      “Violence is the heart of Islam”
      Ayatollah Yazdi

      • gravenimage says

        Nov 29, 2017 at 2:33 pm

        Thanks for reposting that quote.

      • dumbledoresarmy says

        Nov 29, 2017 at 6:54 pm

        John Quincy Adams, definitely *not* ‘far-right’ by any stretch of the imagination, saw Islam with ruthless clarity.

        Here’s what he said, in 1829 – “…he [Mohammed] declared undistinguishing and exterminating war, as a part of his religion, against all the rest of mankind. THE ESSENCE OF HIS DOCTRINE WAS VIOLENCE AND LUST: TO EXALT THE BRUTAL OVER THE SPIRITUAL PART OF HUMAN NATURE.”

        Note – the capitals are in Adams’ original essay. It is the only time in the entire essay that he uses all-caps like that. Remember: it was 1829, and he wasn’t in online comments on FB, this was a sober essay in a very sober publication.

        And he was a very, very careful writer, classically educated. He was like our own ‘Hugh Fitzgerald’, formidably learned and an exquisite stylist. It is therefore most telling that Adams, of all people, chose to use all-caps like that, in the middle of his very scholarly and sober essay. It’s a shock. He meant it to be a shock, because he was trying to *get through*, to emphasise the size of the threat that he had perceived.

        • Norger says

          Nov 30, 2017 at 1:05 am

          Great post. Unfortunately such unvarnished truths are considered “racist” (what race is Islam again?) or “Islamophobic” (nonsense term) today. Robert Spencer has never said anything close to “Islam is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog,” yet he gets banned from the U.K. (sigh).

        • Theophilus says

          Nov 30, 2017 at 7:41 am

          Could you kindly post the source reference for that excellent quotation? Thanks.

        • Jack Diamond says

          Nov 30, 2017 at 11:39 am

          Which excellent quote?

          The annotated “John Quincy Adams: A Bibliography,” compiled by Lynn H. Parsons (Westport, CT, 1993, p. 41, entry#194) contains “Unsigned essays dealing with the Russo-Turkish War and on Greece,” (The American Annual Register for 1827-28-29 (NY: 1830)

          and more from Adams: “The precept of the Koran is perpetual war against all who deny that Mahomet is the prophet of God. The vanquished may purchase their lives, by the payment of tribute; the victorious may be appeased by a false and delusive promise of peace; and the faithful follower of the prophet, may submit to the imperious necessities of defeat: but the command to propagate the Moslem creed by the sword is always obligatory, when it can be made effective. The commands of the prophet may be performed alike, by fraud, or by force.”

          Winston Churchill, “The River War” (1899):

          “How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy.

          The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property – either as a child, a wife, or a concubine – must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the Queen: all know how to die: but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome.” {248–250}

        • Red Bee says

          Nov 30, 2017 at 11:40 am

          Here is a webpage about this essay: https://www.apologeticspress.org/apcontent.aspx?category=7&article=1142
          The full essay can probably be found in the archive mentioned in the references.

        • tim gallagher says

          Nov 30, 2017 at 5:15 pm

          I agree that John Quincy Adams ideas about Islam are excellent. You may know about this already, Theophilus, but if not, you might be interested, since you asked about the Adams’ comment. A few years back, I heard something about Adams’ comments, so I googled: “John Quincy Adams on Islam” and the fifth reference down the page is “wikiislam” which has a huge number of critical comments about Islam by many different people. It’s worth a look. There’s some very good comments there, although I think Adams’ comments are the best.

    • blitz2b says

      Nov 29, 2017 at 2:27 pm

      “…Leftards are not angry that Muslims do this …”

      mortimer, The reason that the leftards are furious about Trump’s tweets exposing Muslims is that they aster the ones who tirelessly sweep away every single atrocious and heinous crimes committed by Muslims in the name of Islam under the rug…. and then along comes Trump who drags out all the Islamic filth that the left wants kept hidden from plain sight so that they can blow smoke into the eyes of the uninformed masses.

      Trumps honesty about these issues is what got him elected… Glad he has not forgotten his promises that most politicians do once they are in office.

      • Anne Dunn says

        Nov 30, 2017 at 9:32 am

        Islam has been given the platinum card of respect , that it has never earned . Islam is not a “ peacemaker’ , yet it is wrapped in cotton bunting , as if it were an endangered species , which it is not .

  2. Emilie Green says

    Nov 29, 2017 at 12:17 pm

    Theresa May condemns what?

    Muslim behaving as instructed in their holy books and by the example of Mohammad,

    or,

    That Trump, acting as a Paul Revere, is exposing normative Muslim behavior?

    • StacyGirl says

      Nov 29, 2017 at 3:00 pm

      Both. Exactly what is May’s end game anyway?

      • b.a. freeman says

        Nov 29, 2017 at 6:22 pm

        surrender, so long as she gets to live, and to continue to live better than the stinking masses.

        • tim gallagher says

          Nov 30, 2017 at 3:06 am

          I just saw a TV news report on this story about Trump retweeting these videos. It quoted Theresa May as saying that “Britain First” aim to divide society . I found this very annoying because, as far as I can see, Islam always seeks to divide society. They’ve got the House of Islam and the House of War (the non-Muslims), they’re always trying to impose barbaric Shariah law, etc. It is so obvious. Maybe Britain First is seeking to divide UK society. I don’t know about the group. But, how pathetic of May to not know that Islam is seeking to divide and take over UK society. Islamic supremacism as Robert Spencer puts it.. People like May, with their wilful blindness to Islam’s aims, seem to be trying to keep society slumbering away, pretending Muslims are getting along just fine and not creating disharmony, until evil Islam takes over. She, and the other liars like her, disgust me. I thought it was such a dishonest response to the Trump retweets. So many of our leaders are hopeless and cowardly. They refuse to face the truth.

    • Just me, nobody else says

      Nov 29, 2017 at 5:01 pm

      Well, she did once ban Robert Spencer, claiming he was a danger to the British People!
      ———————————————————————————————————————

      Let’s not forget that only a few years ago, when Theresa May was Home Secretary for the UK (and equally incompetent and dishonest at that job as she is now as the beleaguered country’s Prime Minister), she banned Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller from entering the country while at the same time allowing (and in some ways welcoming and actually encouraging) outright “hate preachers” to come and go freely….

      It should be easy to see where her true loyalties lie….

    • Anne Dunn says

      Nov 30, 2017 at 9:38 am

      Apparently , we must not hate evil .. we must embrace a religion that promised victory for its followers , victory and rewards for killing the kuffir .. our governments want us to embrace not reject, the sacrifice of our minds and bodies to Islam .. love our enemy , is the rule now .. say and do nothing as our people shatter into a thousand pieces..

    • Carolyne says

      Nov 30, 2017 at 11:10 am

      Good comparison, but the British didn’t much like Paul Revere, either.

  3. R Russell says

    Nov 29, 2017 at 12:27 pm

    I cannot understand why those who oppose Trump would rather show their bigoted ignorance by refusing to use a search engine to check if what he is saying is accurate or not.
    It’s not hard to find examples – Europe is teeming with them and if they would only look at what was happening in Iraq and Syria these last few years they would not look so daft.

    • b.a. freeman says

      Nov 29, 2017 at 6:38 pm

      mr. russell, they are hoping that people will not look; in the meantime, the nazis at google are busily changing the “good search” criteria by telling their army of 10 000 “search raters” to lower the quality ratings of searches about jihad, taqiyyah, et al., so that only muslim propaganda comes out in the first million or so searches, and so that the AI running the search engine, which “learns” from the 10 000 human raters with far more weight than from ordinary searches, learns to lower the search quality of truth, rather like anti-SEO. in the end, it won’t be possible to find anything at all about islam using google, because only bulls**t will come up. i recommend that U use *any* search engine that is obscure, because they’ll just be glad to get customers, and are less likely to tamper with the truth. personally, i mostly use duckduckgo dot com, followed by bing, and resort to google only when i can’t find information on *any* other search site.

      it’s hard to find the truth when U don’t know it, when it is actively being hidden, and when U don’t know that it’s being hidden. google is being run by nazi liars; the blood of many thousands, if not millions, will soon be on their leftist hands.

  4. Jaladhi says

    Nov 29, 2017 at 12:32 pm

    Why don’t we ban those MPs who advocate ban on Trump from entering USA? That will be tit for tat!

    • b.a. freeman says

      Nov 29, 2017 at 6:45 pm

      i think a citizen protest would be better; perhaps a group of a hundred or so could meet their plane, and when they walk off into the public area, the group could all give them a series of hearty “sieg heil” salutes.

      but i forget myself; the lying left never subjects themselves to the stinking masses. instead, they would sneak in and be whisked away by a security team, which is very similar to the security team that travels around with me, except that mine is imaginary, and theirs is armed. it’s nice to be special.

      ****ing nazis.

  5. Walt Parkman says

    Nov 29, 2017 at 12:39 pm

    Whatever the process is for getting banned from Britain, I intend to do all of the necessary steps, short of violence of course. I would like to cooperate with the Home Office on this matter.. Still waiting for them to return my email.

    • Carolyne says

      Nov 30, 2017 at 10:25 am

      I have banned myself from Britain. In the past, I traveled there several times a year just for vacation and to see many of the historical sights and buildings. I have not been there for several years, exactly because of the takeover of the west end of London by barbarians. I also understand that the “Tower Hamlets” which is such a charming name, is not occupied by charming people, but by Muslims who constantly threaten any non-Muslim they encounter. I don’t know if it is safe to even visit the tower anymore.

      My money to travel will be spent elsewhere and I suggest any American who wishes to remain safe stay away from England.

  6. Ren says

    Nov 29, 2017 at 12:40 pm

    I don’t trust the Left for a bit. They’re a buch of crazy folks.

  7. Westman says

    Nov 29, 2017 at 12:43 pm

    “..They are abhorrent, dangerous and a threat to our society.” – Jeremy Corbyn

    No, Mr. Corbin, you are utterly incorrect on both claims. The UK has TWO distinct societies – one, of which, is totally beyond your control and has ruling ambitions.

    • b.a. freeman says

      Nov 29, 2017 at 6:52 pm

      actually, Westman, it has three. first, there is the tiny protected minority, the elite, of which mr. corbyn is a member; next, there is the group with ruling ambitions which is totally beyond his control; and the last is the largest by far, probably exceeding the combination of the first and second by a factor of at least 9, and probably more. this last group is the one that will contribute the most bodies to the mass graves lined up for them by the second group. the first group will become muslim, because they are cowards, especially when confronted with a choice that might end their own lives.

  8. Red Bee says

    Nov 29, 2017 at 12:52 pm

    The disabled boy was not beaten by a Muslim or an immigrant but by a Dutch bully. The perpetrator has been arrested by the police.

    According to the Dutch newspaper “de Telegraaf” today: https://www.telegraaf.nl/nieuws/1368689/donald-trump-de-mist-in-met-retweet-dumpert-filmpje

    • StacyGirl says

      Nov 29, 2017 at 3:02 pm

      Well sorry. It will have to be replaced with one of the million plus other examples, unless you want to go back over 6 months.

      • overman says

        Nov 29, 2017 at 3:54 pm

        Yes, even if the disabled kid story is fake – [the Dutch media are as untrustworthy as all the other msm outlets around the word – the religion of the perpetrators wasn’t revealed] – the atrocities committed in the name of lslam, on a daily basis, are all too real.
        l can’t understand why Britain First doesn’t have more recent videos. The one’s mentioned here are years old, apparently. There must be more recent footage of muslim criminal activity available, surely.

        • Red Bee says

          Nov 29, 2017 at 4:28 pm

          The atrocities committed in the name of Islam, on a daily basis, are very real and a threat to our civilization. You don’t have to convince me.

          We should reach and convince the 80% of the electorate that “hit the snooze button after 9/11”, as Brigitte Gabriel put it, that Islam is a threat. POTUS making a mistake like this is a very serious setback. The fog is getting thicker & the Islamic equivalent of Morpheus is grinning.

          If you have ideas, pls let me know on my website.

        • Carolyne says

          Nov 30, 2017 at 10:28 am

          I don’t know if the video is fake or not. I am convinced that if it is not true, there are hundreds more which are similar and which are true.

      • Red Bee says

        Nov 29, 2017 at 3:59 pm

        The million plus other examples do not count. What counts is the political capital CAIR and others are going to get from this mistake by POTUS & it is a huge sum 🙁

        ( btw. I do not understand what you mean by ” unless you want to go back over 6 months.” but that is probably because English is not my mother tongue)

        • roberta says

          Nov 29, 2017 at 4:26 pm

          If, and I am saying (if) this child was not beat by a muslim. Dont think anyone will gain victim points at Pres. Trumps expense. He is 3 steps ahead of his haters. Shaming him on one video, means they have to admit the other 2 videos are factual. He is forcing them to tell on themselves. The loader they scream, the better.
          Then while they are calling attention to themselves, he can tweet out more true videos. They are only doing his marketing for him.

        • Red Bee says

          Nov 29, 2017 at 4:47 pm

          @ roberta: I hope you are right but CAIR does not seem to think so. I subscribed to their newsletters, press and action alerts, and they are calling a press conference. We should not underestimate them. They think it is to their advantage to call attention to these tweets by POTUS.

        • overman says

          Nov 29, 2017 at 7:12 pm

          lt’s possible this was needed to wake up the slumbering UK public. There will be a lot of press coverage on this and ppl might finally start questioning the true nature of the lslamic threat. Hopefully, they will read between the lines.

          l’m not sure if CAIR has a UK branch [wouldn’t surprise me], but the likes of Sadiq Khan and Maajid Nawaz [LBC] will certainly use this opportunity to blow their apologetic trumpets.

    • b.a. freeman says

      Nov 29, 2017 at 6:56 pm

      they said that he was not a *migrant*; that he was born in-country does not mean that he is not *muslim*.

      none of the “debunkings” of which i have read have proven any of the videos to be fake; two were not *migrants*, and one happened in egypt in 2013 (and the perpetrator was hung by the State). so that proves that islam is safe … how?

      let us be careful about what is called “debunking.”

      • gravenimage says

        Nov 29, 2017 at 7:17 pm

        Also true.

      • overman says

        Nov 29, 2017 at 7:40 pm

        “they said that he was not a *migrant*; that he was born in-country does not mean that he is not *muslim*”

        Exactly.

      • Carolyne says

        Nov 30, 2017 at 11:15 am

        I don’t think those of us here are guilty of saying “Debunking” in reference to Mr. Trump’s tweeted material. It is the press which claims debunking. One can warn them to be careful, but it will do not good.

        No need to preach to the choir.

    • maghan says

      Nov 30, 2017 at 7:06 am

      The guy in that photo looks North African. OK, looks can be deceiving.

    • R Russell says

      Nov 30, 2017 at 3:59 pm

      I cannot find it, but today I read here on Jihad Watch some info from a Dutch contributor. Semantics is the name of the game.
      He said, in the Netherlands when you are third generation immigrant you are no longer called an immigrant. You are called Dutch. Thus the attacker, whose immediate forefathers were Muslim immigrants is legally called Dutch. He is still a Muslim and a third generation immigrant.

  9. Shmoovie says

    Nov 29, 2017 at 12:57 pm

    Dare you, Corbyn, to explain just WHY those messages are ‘dangerous’ and threatening to their society. But– you must give an honest answer, not the quivering pro-islam crock approved by your lords Mayor Khan and the Brit imams.

    A Pat Condell response to this would be delicious.

    • DFD says

      Nov 29, 2017 at 1:13 pm

      No, it wouldn’t. Condrell is at best a demagogue. You should hear him attacking Christianity. Essentially he is attacking Christianity as viciously as Islam – but throws in a caveat or two, just enough to cover himself.

      I know, he is well known on this, and similar, sites for his criticism of Islam. Which is good, but listen to the rest of what he says….

      • gravenimage says

        Nov 29, 2017 at 3:00 pm

        Condell is rather like Christopher Hitchens, DFD. One need not agree with him on all matters to recognize him as an important voice against Jihad.

        Criticism of Christianity–fair or not–is not a real threat to Christians. They can handle it.

        • Norger says

          Nov 30, 2017 at 1:18 am

          Criticism of any other major religion is not perceived as a threat or worthy of violent response by followers of any such other religion. You’ve probably heard Sam Harris’s analogy to the Mormon’s peaceful objection to response to the Book of Mormon play on Broadway—putting flyers in playbills. Point being that everyone knows you could never do a “Book of Islam” play OM Broadway. Personally I think that Trump’s tweeting is often crude—unbecoming of a President IMO. That said it’s remarkable that the MSM won’t even attempt to consider Trump’s point—-that there is a connection between Islam and the atrocities shown on these videos. Won’t even consider it.

        • Carolyne says

          Nov 30, 2017 at 10:35 am

          And do not forget that in the united States, one has the right to criticize Christianity without fear of death by government. Maybe a verbal attack by someone who is a fanatic with a few loose screws, but we are legally able to criticize any religion

          The penalty for criticizing Christianity is a few verbal attacks by lunatics. They can be brushed off as the nonsense they are. But these fanatics do not kill you or threaten to do so. Muslims do.

        • gravenimage says

          Nov 30, 2017 at 9:25 pm

          True, Norger and Carolyne.

      • Leon Degney says

        Nov 30, 2017 at 1:57 am

        Do you REALLY believe christianity is not deserving of being attacked? What about the atrocities of the catholic church against kids? Christianity in most case is rotten to the core the only saving grace is that generally they are not violent.

        • gravenimage says

          Nov 30, 2017 at 9:28 pm

          Leon, your idea that Christianity preaches that the church abuse children is quite mistaken.

          Such crimes are also illegal in the Christian West.

  10. overman says

    Nov 29, 2017 at 1:05 pm

    Bravo Trump. l just hope he doesn’t back down.

    • gravenimage says

      Nov 29, 2017 at 3:02 pm

      +1

    • dumbledoresarmy says

      Nov 29, 2017 at 7:00 pm

      Tweet him or email him or even write him a letter and say that to him, straight up.

  11. Robert_k says

    Nov 29, 2017 at 1:07 pm

    “O’ Sons of Apes and Pigs, ‘Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil about Islam or you are Islamophobes!!’ “.

    • overman says

      Nov 29, 2017 at 4:00 pm

      Precisely – exactly how they want us. Dhimmi-Mode ‘Blind,Deaf and Dumb’

  12. Malcolm (South Afric) says

    Nov 29, 2017 at 1:07 pm

    Good for president Trump. The truth hurts, however instead of the left acknowledging it, they create a positive narrative of the perpetrators, ignore the victims, then shoot or sideline the messenger.

  13. DFD says

    Nov 29, 2017 at 1:08 pm

    I suggest, nay urge you to go to https://www.britainfirst.org/
    Also google or search otherwise. The hate and smear campaign against Britain First is staggering. They are called “ultra right”, Nazis” etc. Total bull!!!!!

    They went into Muslim ‘territories’ with crosses. They turned up on Choudwdhry’s doorstep! Without them Chowdhry would still not have been arrested and sentenced. The way they are haunted is something straight from STASI

    Go and find out.

    About Trump, I have many, many reservations about the man. But twittering this, I have to say: Respect.

    • gravenimage says

      Nov 29, 2017 at 3:08 pm

      I have my issues with Trump, as well–as does Robert Spencer. He is *far* from perfect. For all that, he is more anti-Jihad than most Western leaders these days, and we Americans could have done a lot worse in the last election.

      • LeftisruiningCanada says

        Nov 29, 2017 at 3:47 pm

        My wife and i just this past half hour said pretty much exactly that.

        Like Regan, Mr Trump is about as opposite what the euro-elite crowd consider acceptable in politics as could be thought up. He comes from, and stands for, so much that they have spent their whole lives learning to despise, and not only him but most of what Republican ideals stand for too.

        Canada is no different of course, at least so far as the politicians are concerned. The state funded CBC is literally obsessed with finding ways to misrepresent him and his staff, and by extension everything less socialist than their own position.

        They are well aware of how popular Mr Trump, or at least his stand point, is amongst normal people and are doing everything they can to draw a line in the mental sand of the country’s psyche, which if even approached marks one out for ridicule and shunning.

        America, and everyone in the West, whether they realize it or not, could have done a lot worse that having Mr Trump, and those that he brought with him, in the White house. It’s all about the balance he and his party bring which, if HRC had been put in, would have completely disappeared.

        • gravenimage says

          Nov 29, 2017 at 7:19 pm

          🙂

      • Carolyne says

        Nov 30, 2017 at 10:38 am

        Of course President Trump is far from perfect. I have never seen a perfect human. One cannot expect perfection from a politician, but I must say that President Trump comes closest to my ideal of an honest politician as it is possible to be. And certainly more than any other.

        • John S., Obeda says

          Nov 30, 2017 at 5:40 pm

          I agree. God bless our dear president and protect him from his enemies and help him to be courageous and to speak well. Christians should be often praying for him. God bless him to learn well what Islam stands for and to teach the evil doctrines and practises of Islam to the people of our nation.

    • gravenimage says

      Nov 29, 2017 at 3:15 pm

      And DFD, thanks for the information on Britain First. The idea that you cannot go into parts of Britain today with crosses is just grotesque. For instance, no Jewish person would demand that no one could enter a Jewish neighborhood with a cross. Only Muslims with No Go Zones make such demands.

      • LeftisruiningCanada says

        Nov 29, 2017 at 3:51 pm

        A cross bearing procession may not be too welcome in places like Mea Sharim, but i’m not sure it is comparable to simply walking through a supposedly English town…..though the muslims would undoubtedly disagree.

        • DFD says

          Nov 29, 2017 at 4:04 pm

          They don’t ‘disagree’, they physically attack

        • LeftisruiningCanada says

          Nov 29, 2017 at 5:56 pm

          As is their allah given right, of course: dhimmi disagree, muslims attack. Simple.

  14. Phil Copson says

    Nov 29, 2017 at 1:11 pm

    Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn: ‘I hope our Government will condemn far-right retweets by Donald Trump…abhorrent, dangerous… a threat to…society.’

    Naz Shah, Labour MP: ‘…‘If a Muslim leader was found sharing extremist content – and was speaking at a conference, local councils… would… cancel the conference.

    ‘I think it is clear that if the President of the USA comes…, the Home Office might ….request any sessions be cancelled.’

    Stephen Doughty MP: ‘shocking Trump tweets’, / ‘very serious concerns given content and ongoing criminal proceedings.’

    Green Party MP Caroline Lucas… said: ‘The President of the US has just retweeted a convicted British fascist. Theresa May must publicly condemn him immediately. We cannot stand by and watch Donald Trump spew this hate.’…

    A psychologist could have a field day with the British political establishment – half-mad with fear and cowardice, shrieking abuse at anyone who points out that our civilisation is being rapidly over-run, and desperate to ingratiate themselves with those who will depose them.

    In each case, they find nothing whatsoever to criticise in the actions of the perpetrators of violence and desecration, only in the public-spirited actions of those who try to warn us that we are on the road to disaster. They don’t describe a gang of muslim thugs beating up a Dutch boy for being white as “fascists”, but they call Jayda Fransden a “fascist” for drawing attention to it. They don’t find it abhorrent to smash-up a church, but they find Trump “abhorrent” and accuse him of “spewing hatred” for alerting the public to it.

    Naz Shah’s comments are breath-taking in their arrogance and duplicity “If a muslim leader was found sharing extremist content and speaking at a conference….” she says. “Yes, Naz – you’d do what exactly ? No – don’t tell us, we already know – he’d be treated as an honoured guest, allowed to address the Houses of Parliament, meet the Archbishop of Canterbury, and travel freely around the country to mosques and universities, calling for the murder of homosexuals and Jews, and for the establishment of a world-wide caliphate to overthrow Western civilisation.”

    For those who don’t know, Naz Shah MP is an appalling muslim racist who says that the young white victims of Muslim rape-squads should “shut up in the interests of diversity….”

    • LeftisruiningCanada says

      Nov 29, 2017 at 2:44 pm

      Yeah, that Naz Shah, what a piece of work. The level of hypocrisy and delusion (either self delusion or a delusion he’s trying to perpetrate on others) really is breath taking.

      He is a soft version of what it would be like living under a full sharia state.

      If that’s not enough to make us fight it, nothing is.

      • LeftisruiningCanada says

        Nov 29, 2017 at 6:21 pm

        *She, obviously!

    • Frank Anderson says

      Nov 30, 2017 at 2:28 am

      Phil, I have excused many potential clients from my office for uncooperative behavior on the initial interview. I predict that a psychologist or psychiatrist, with far better and greater training and experience, would take even less time to realize the nut jobs killing the Europe of ?? years ago, are beyond assistance. Futile gestures and self-defeating behavior are not healthy physically, mentally or societally.

    • Carolyne says

      Nov 30, 2017 at 10:47 am

      And as Americans, we must stress that the person who produced this video was jailed for a violation of speech laws in England. Not a criminal act, but for what was said. We still have the First Amendment but how long will we keep it.

  15. Voytek Gagalka says

    Nov 29, 2017 at 1:17 pm

    For mere quoting in public Sir Winston Churchill’s views on Islam and Mohammedans one British politician was arrested and jailed. Similarly, he did not originate those views: they were written down and known for long time. Apparently, in Britain today, one is not permitted to mention anything which authorities might consider controversial. For all practical purposes, it is no longer free country and that’s undisputed fact regardless if the PM May and hordes of British elites may be fuming on me for stating the obvious.

    • LeftisruiningCanada says

      Nov 29, 2017 at 3:53 pm

      Heck, i think people have been troubled, if not arrested, for reading the koran out loud in public, because they were trying to show how nasty it is.

      Reading the Bible out loud will also bring you trouble.

      Reading Marx out loud……probably just fine.

  16. Bob Smyth says

    Nov 29, 2017 at 1:23 pm

    “Naz Shah, Labour MP for Bradford West, said: ‘I will be writing to the Home Secretary this afternoon.”

    That’s the SAME “Naz Shah, Labour MP for Bradford West” who said that the thousands of non-Muslim teenage girls who were groomed/abused/raped by Muslim men in Rotherham, “should shut mouths for diversity”.

  17. Guest says

    Nov 29, 2017 at 1:30 pm

    Boycotting CNN? That sounds like an excellent idea.

    • Karen says

      Nov 29, 2017 at 5:58 pm

      Yes. Why does anyone watch CNN, MSNBC or the broadcast networks? There are plenty of better alternatives now. Let all the old school media outlets go down the drain.

  18. Kenny says

    Nov 29, 2017 at 1:31 pm

    Am I missing something? The ‘right on’, condemnation of Trump would appear to miss the point that these videos may show up Islamic violence and aggression. It would appear that this has been leap frogged over in order to seize any opportunity to kick Trump.

    • LeftisruiningCanada says

      Nov 29, 2017 at 2:05 pm

      Just like im sure the Communist Broadcasters of Canada will be doing right now, if i had the stomach to turn the radio on and find out.

      Like all good leftists, no good chance to rant about rump must be missed. If you do miss it, make one up.

  19. Mr F Middleton says

    Nov 29, 2017 at 2:22 pm

    Meanwhile, PM May is en route to Iran to drum up some trade with fanatics who want to usher in the end times with nuclear weapons. No problem there, then.

  20. gravenimage says

    Nov 29, 2017 at 2:30 pm

    Donald Trump retweets videos of Muslims being violent, Labour MPs call for him to be banned from UK events
    ………………………….

    I just heard about this on news radio. It was said that reporting on Muslim violence is a “hurtful narrative”–apparently Muslim violence is not hurtful, but daring to mention it *is*. Insanity.

  21. David Stephenson says

    Nov 29, 2017 at 2:37 pm

    Thank you x1000 to President Trump for doing this! This is why I voted for him. He stands up for what is right, not what is “politically correct”. Bravo!

    • dumbledoresarmy says

      Nov 29, 2017 at 7:06 pm

      I hope you’ve just tweeted him or emailed him, post haste, to tell him exactly that.

      You could encourage him to make sure, via a suitable staffer – or even just cross-checking with Mr Spencer via a private email – that any video of mohammedan bad behaviour *has* been firmly verified as such. Refer him to MEMRI as a future source of eye-opening clips. MEMRI has *thousands* of much more frightening things, all verified… most of them drawn from Muslim in-house media outlets!! The most frightening things of all are the Mohammedan *sermons* and talk-show segments.

      • John S., Obeda says

        Nov 30, 2017 at 5:56 pm

        DDA, to contact the president or his staff is always a good idea, but I don’t have his email. I’m an 87 year old green horn. I grew up with the typewriter and mimeograph machine. and no tv existed. I listened to the radio to hear Jack Armstrong the ALL-American Boy.

        • gravenimage says

          Nov 30, 2017 at 9:32 pm

          Here’s how to contact the White House, John:

          https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact

      • dumbledoresarmy says

        Dec 1, 2017 at 9:44 am

        Gravenimage has given you the contact details.

        Get a nice Christmas card: and hand-write, inside it, what you just said, “Thank you x1000 for doing this! This is why I voted for you. You stand up for what is right, not what is “politically correct”. Bravo!” (make sure to mention it’s in connection with his re-tweeting items that focus attention on the violence of Islam). Then pop a stamp on it and post it.

  22. Mark says

    Nov 29, 2017 at 3:05 pm

    On BBC radio 4 they described the videos as “who’s veracity had not been verified”. No checking, or saying that they would check, or saying that they had any reason to doubt them. Obviously implying that Muslims don’t do that sort of thing without actually lying.

    • LeftisruiningCanada says

      Nov 29, 2017 at 4:10 pm

      And the BBC News still considers itself a journalistic enterprise?

      Maybe they never really did.

  23. gfmucci says

    Nov 29, 2017 at 3:10 pm

    Trump may soon join Robert, Pamela, Michael S. and me in being persona non grata in formerly Great Britain.

  24. Alarmed Pig Farmer says

    Nov 29, 2017 at 3:36 pm

    I wrote in here years ago that Islam is the only belief system in history to instantly become murderously violent when a mirror is help up to its face.

    Now the ruling elites of certain nations are making it a rule to base foreign policy on maintaining silence on the inconvenient truths of Islam. That being hundreds of thousands of documented facts of Moslem behavior. Stay silent, leader of another country, or you can’t visit us. Righteous and principled.

    • LeftisruiningCanada says

      Nov 29, 2017 at 4:08 pm

      Similar in principle to how you can’t enter many islamic countries if you’ve an israeli stamp in your passport.

  25. BARBARA BROOKS says

    Nov 29, 2017 at 4:35 pm

    Trump is his own worst enemy! Now the conversation is about how bigoted and Islamaphobic Britain First is. If Trump had simply found some verified photos from reliable news reports and posted those, then the discussion would have been about migrant crime. Undoubtedly, the mainstream media would say that the level of crime is “exaggerated”, but at least the subject would be discussed.

    • b.a. freeman says

      Nov 29, 2017 at 11:31 pm

      there is no such thing as a “verified photo from a reliable news report,” because the only reports that are called reliable by the leftist media are propaganda bulls**t from leftist media. the leftist propaganda outlets *never* report violence by pious muslims as such (instead, it’s done by some poor misguided mentally ill soul, who is there only because it’s the fault of mr. trump and the knuckle-dragging right-wingers); such photos don’t exist.

      and no, the subject would not be discussed; instead, the growing numbers of “mentally ill” (read “pious muslim” instead) people, all of whom were caused by mr. trump, would be discussed, along with the lack of backbone of the congress for not impeaching him for some trumped-up charge or other.

      OTOH, he is a loose cannon; sometimes a loose cannon will run over the wrong people, and sometimes they will be the correct people who deserve to be run over, but that’s what loose cannons do. if that’s the price we have to pay to have *somebody* elected pay any attention to reality, then so be it.

    • Carolyne says

      Nov 30, 2017 at 11:05 am

      No, Ms. Brooks, you are your own worst enemy by believing anything the biased press reports. By relieving this crap, and believe me it is crap which is trying to undermine President Trump, you are helping them along in their takeover of civilization.

      Nor is he a “Loose canon,” as claimed by b.a.freeman. Mr.Trump I am sure, carefully considers his words and the effect they will have. He has not attained his position in life by being a “Loose canon.” Not everyone will agree with his words but that doesn’t mean he is incorrect.

      I trust President Trump far more than I do anonymous posters on internet forums.

  26. Alice says

    Nov 29, 2017 at 5:02 pm

    Those MPs are shamelessly sacrificing their own for power, which they will lose when the objective is reached. How asinine.

    • b.a. freeman says

      Nov 29, 2017 at 11:59 pm

      not really, Alice. i believe that some on the left discovered that pious muslims wish to destroy western civilization (after looting and raping, of course), which fits with their own aims. the left has only attained power in turbulent times, so if hordes of pious muslims will cause turbulent times, all without the hard left garnering any attention at all, this is seen as a good thing. once things get bad enough, the government will declare martial law, and if the leader is a hard-core leftist like mr. obama or ms. clinton (or ms. may, for that matter), the coup will be complete. otherwise, all that is required are a few murders of uncooperative leaders, and then the coup is complete.

      of course, that last part, which may be the more likely scenario, since hard-core leftists have been rare enough, and usually unlikeable as well, may be very hard to pull off, so how to make sure that most of the State is controlled by the left? as it happens, the left has controlled education for decades in almost every westernized nation, so most people come into adulthood at least nominally leftist, and usually voting for those who put forth a leftist agenda. over the decades, this has permeated all parties, so that regardless of party name or supposed side of the aisle, most politicians are fairly leftish. this pretty much makes it a certainty that the State will be controlled by the left, and makes the whole plan pretty plausible. 2 really good things for the left are that not a single hard-core leftist has to throw bombs or shoot people; pious muslims will literally die for the privilege of murdering babies and raping women and little girls (and little boys, for that matter). all attention will be on muslims; victims and vigilant citizens will point to the danger of islam, not the danger of the hard left. all the left has to do is protect their proxy army as long as possible to maximize the damage to society. best of all, the muslims tend to live concentrated in their banlieue, so i’m sure they left are hoping that it will be easy to get the military angry enough to surround all of the banlieue and mass-murder everybody inside them.

      so why do i put forth such a wild-a** strategy as a real-world possibility? well, let me counter by asking U if it is believable that intelligent people would read the quran, the sunnah, and the sirat, as well as the directives of sharia law, and *not* recoil in horror. does anybody who has read any of this filth actually believe that anybody of any political stripe is that stupid? or that government leaders are so stupid that they do not order a subordinate to produce an independent report either verifying or disproving it? if U think so, i encourage U to send me your social security number, your birth certificate, and all your credit card numbers. to be blunt, i can’t see too many other possibilities. the liars and thieves of the left have been winning.

      of course, once they mass-murder a banlieue or 2, the “peaceful” and “moderate” muslims will be easy for the pious to turn into many more pious muslims; there will instantly be *millions* of pious muslims inside the u.s. (or your country), all of them desiring to die killing innocents so that they can achieve jannah. i’d put my money on millions of pious muslims over a few thousand (or even a few million) hard-core leftists. these ****ing idiots failed to think it through, and they don’t give a rat’s a** if U and i die in the crossfire. if somebody doesn’t step up to the plate soon, the hard left will be able to turn muslim over our dead bodies.

  27. DogOnPorch says

    Nov 29, 2017 at 5:24 pm

    Sickening attack on the lad. Kicked him while he was down, etc.

    Trump was right to post this.

  28. Ciudadano says

    Nov 29, 2017 at 5:27 pm

    Another anti-Muslim fake news:

    Pakistan: Christ King procession canceled due to protests by radical Islamists

    https://www.actuall.com/persecucion/pakistan-cancelan-la-procesion-cristo-rey-las-protestas-islamistas-radicales/

    Evidently the the real problem is Islamophobia!

  29. Jan Sobieski says

    Nov 29, 2017 at 5:47 pm

    If showing muslims committing crimes, it is anti-muslim. If I show a video of a murderer, is that anti-murderer?

    • Alarmed Pig Farmer says

      Nov 29, 2017 at 8:47 pm

      Not to muddle things here, but isn’t Moslem crime in and of itself murder? Yeah, I know about the extortion shakedowns, the property thefts and all that, but murder, or the threat of it, is the most basic of Moslem crimes. Unlike murders committed by murderers of another belief system, when Moslems do a murderer it is almost always done with a *purpose* that fits into a larger construct: Jihad + Shariah.

  30. b.a. freeman says

    Nov 29, 2017 at 6:18 pm

    i am furious beyond words.

    the british nazis who control the british government, who have made speech conditional upon approval by pious muslims, are calling out the president for retweeting these videos. i see nothing in the attacks upon him showing *proof* that the videos are fake; rather, one was called “debunked” when the dutch government said that the assailant was not a *migrant* (he was a native-born MUSLIM), one was “debunked” because no *migrants* were involved (again, native-born MUSLIMS don’t have anything to do with ISLAM), and the last was debunked because it happened in egypt and the perp was hanged by the State. these “debunkings” do not prove the events to be false or staged; they only show that *migrants* didn’t do the crimes in eurabia. what about what muhammed did, as recorded in the sunnah? i would ask in turn if ms. may approves of what the quran and sunnah teach. if she says she does, then she could be asked to confirm her approval of muhammed’s monstrous behavior; if she doesn’t, then she could be embarrassed by describing muhammed’s vile behavior as documented in islamic scriptures, pointing out that muhammed is the model of conduct for all muslims, and asking her why she should be prime minister if she can’t even have her minions do basic research on her behalf.

    i do not care for the style of mr. trump. in all probability, he and i disagree on more things than not; i furthermore consider him to be a loose cannon. i would prefer that any of the other republican candidates had won, not him, but i voted for him because his opponent, ms. clinton, is a criminal who is also a treasonous alinskyite hard-core leftist. had she won the election, she would have been able to finish off the republic after her predecessor in alinskyite treason, mr. obama, so successfully gutted the future of the economy with obamacare, divided the nation into warring interest groups, and came close to being able to nationalize local police departments. i would have voted for a tree stump rather than ms. clinton, had that had a chance of stopping her. that said, mr. trump has done much for freedom in this country with the simple appointment of associate justice neil gorsuch, and if his loose-cannon wild swings mean that he attracts much unnecessary bad press as the price for the protection of freedom by exposure of the vile treason of the left, then so be it.

    • eduardo odraude says

      Nov 29, 2017 at 11:51 pm

      I doubt any of the other 16 candidates on the Republican side would have done anything to resist Islam. His resistance to Islamic totalitarianism and to its spread into the West, and his courageous rejection of political correctness, are the main things I like about him, and the fact that he is pursuing a “conservative” agenda for the most part. The other Repub candidates, to me, were all stiffs, processed robots, mediocrities with no real vision. I loved Trump’s recent Warsaw speech ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFTKl5bzD78 ), in which he not only praised Poland to the skies (recall that Poland is one of the Visegrad nations rejecting Muslim immigration), but in the second half of the same speech he stood up for Western civilization in a powerful way that suggests he really knows and cares about what hangs in the balance today. So few are willing to resist Islamic totalitarianism today, but Trump gets it, gets how important it is, somewhat as Reagan got it that communism was evil, got it at a time when many did not care about that issue or thought it was outrageous to speak of the Soviet Union as an “evil empire.”

      I’m a little concerned about where Trump will steer the nation in these incredibly dangerous times (I just now heard on the radio that North Korea probably has the ability to nuke the continental U.S., or will have the ability very soon) but I’d be concerned about whoever was at the helm. I trust Trump more than I would Clinton. My sense is that she’s incompetent.

      • b.a. freeman says

        Nov 30, 2017 at 12:32 am

        eduardo, mr. cruz is a lawyer who has taken cases before the SCOTUS several times; he is also a constitutional scholar in the true sense, not in the “know thine enemy” sense of mr. obama, the most successful traitor in american history. mr. cruz gives speeches a little stiffly, but as we have seen with mr. trump, who does not usually give eloquent speeches, that need not be a hindrance. in any case, as i intimated, *anybody* would have been better than ms. clinton, probably the second-most successful traitor in american history (although she is a fairly-competent criminal, at least in her ability to line up protection after the crime has been committed).

        yes, mr. trump’s speech was indeed well-spoken, and i am *thrilled* that not only the people, but also the governments, of eastern europe have chosen to remain free. i would even argue that those folks have a closer connection to freedom than we do, given the traitors whom we have foolishly allowed to betray us; many americans have come to understand the danger of this vile pirate cult, but the elites “know better” than we, the stinking masses, do, and refuse to do anything, preaching to us about how evil and “islamophobic” we are, while eastern europeans are actually able to throw the bums out and put true representatives into power.

        president andrew jackson is one of my heroes. i say that in spite of the horrors he inflicted upon the cherokee with the trail of tears. he did not want a second government to exist within the u.s., because he believed that it would weaken us both internally and externally, so he felt that the indians had to go. i believe he was wrong in that belief, but i admire his love for the nation that inspired his action, his belief that the federal debt *had* to be paid off (he paid it off, including the remaining debt from the revolution), and his belief that the nation belonged to the *people*, not the rich bi***es on the east coast. he was human; some of him was good, and some not so much. i see mr. trump in much the same light. when i call him a loose cannon, i mean that he needlessly invites attacks by the leftist propaganda outlets with a lot of his outbursts. his outbursts don’t kill people, however, but his leftist opponents do; their bloody fingerprints are all over every attack on u.s. soil since at least 1993.

        i keep praying to hear a speech from him indicting the left for allowing the evil of islam into the country, explaining how islam works, and how evil it truly is. i will grant that not everybody in government is “in on it,” because most people just do their job, and let the people further up the food chain make the more-important decisions. people like mr. spencer used to be able to train the higher-ups about islam; perhaps someday soon the State will start acting like it actually understands it. up until a few years ago, i personally did not understand just how evil islam was, and i suspect that many, *many* other people are in that same position now. if mr. trump brings it up, though, no matter what the lying leftist propaganda outlets have to say, it *will* get discussed.

    • Carolyne says

      Nov 30, 2017 at 11:09 am

      I doubt that Mr. Trump would be upset knowing your opinion of him.

  31. dumbledoresarmy says

    Nov 29, 2017 at 7:32 pm

    Australia’s ABC (national news outlet) has had their in-Britain correspondent James Glenday do a ‘hit-piece’ on ‘Britain First’ (the report is an appalling piece of propaganda, full of cliches and sly misdirections and editorialising) and he has just ‘reported’ on this in the most appalling manner.

    Here is his first ‘report’.
    http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-11-30/donald-trumps-far-right-britain-first-retweets-shocks-uk/9209648
    “Donald Trump’s far-right Britain First retweets are gobsmacking, particularly in Britain”
    By Europe correspondent James Glenday

    James Glenday says, of ‘Britain First’ – “They have two main aims: banning Islam and removing anyone practising the religion from the United Kingdom.”
    If that’s their main aims, so what? I assume the ban is intended for within Britain. As far as I am concerned, I think Islam is worse than the mafia – much much worse – and worse than the Thuggee cult. So what’s wrong with intending to ban its practice in the UK? It’s a death-murder-rape-enslavement-armed.robbery-extortion system, total *and* totalitarian. Why not ban such a system? If something exactly the same as Islam but under a different name with a different cult leader was invented *today* and started carrying out armed robberies to profit its Dear Leader and his cronies, and assassinating its critics, it would be banned in a jiffy. (Think what the Japanese did to Aum Shinrykyo). And as for removing all Muslims from the UK? – perfectly good idea. (I’m surprised there’s no mention of **stopping Muslim IMMIGRATION*… ‘When in hole, stop digging!). If all identifiable Muslims were expelled from Thailand, India, Israel, Philippines, UK, France, Germany, Scandinavia, Australia, USA, Ethiopia, Uganda, Central African Republic, Trinidad-and-Tobago, Fiji, Russian Federation, China, you-name-it – in *every* country where there are more than half a dozen Muslims present, there are problems! – the homeland-security headaches in all those countries would instantly become much less of a headache.

    Britain First are not the only people, by a long chalk, to have recognised the flaming obvious – Got Muslims? Got Jihad? – and they are merely stating the obvious remedy for any Infidel country currently afflicted with a colony of Allah Gangsters or Mohammedan Mobsters. Kick ’em out!!

    Anyway, back to Mr Glenday. He then reports (obviously approvingly) on the screams of rage from the Dhimmis in the UK government.

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-11-30/donald-trump-retweets-anti-muslim-videos-from-far-right-british/9209100

    Now, here is the ‘hit piece’ done by Mr Glenday, back in March this year, on ‘Britain First’. Note that for the likes of Mr Glenday, being ‘anti-Islam’ seems to be to put yourself beyond the pale. It is not allowed to be ‘anti-Islam’.

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-03-05/a-day-with-alt-right-britain-first/8324680
    Britain First: A day with the UK’s anti-Islam alt-right group

    he quotes a statement made by the leader – “The bigger the Muslim population becomes the more terrorism [sic: possibly the leader should have said – “the more open and intense aggression and violence against surrounding non-Muslims – dda], sharia law, the more problems that come along with them, Muslim grooming gangs that’s why we’re here today.”

    Or, in short – “Got Muslims? Got Jihad”. – dda Mr Glenday, of course, is frantically refusing to see that.

    It is possible to send an email to Mr Glenday. Go to the links I gave for those two reports, look carefully – you will see ‘Contact James Glenday’ down the bottom somewhere.

    Send him an email – especially if you are an Aussie. Be brief, be polite, and make it plain to him that you are puzzled as to why the mere fact of being opposed to the idea of Islamisation of one’s previously-non-Islamic homeland makes a person ‘far-right’ (which, as we know, is today a synonym for ‘monster-of-evil’).

    Suggest that he interview some of the *other* people in the UK who are publicly critical of Islam – e.g. Douglas Murray, and Gavin Boby of the “Law and Freedom Foundation’ which produced the detailed and damning report on the Muslim rape-and-pimping gangs, “Easy Meat” (refer Mr Glenday to ‘Easy Meat’ and suggest that he read it through, slowly and carefully, paying particular attention to the reported statements by the girl victims; and Mr Glenday must ask himself whether he has the *hide* to call those poor girls “far-right” because they dared to stand up and testify against their – overwhelmingly Muslim – abusers, in court.)

    • gravenimage says

      Nov 30, 2017 at 9:35 pm

      Thanks, DDA.

  32. Davegreybeard says

    Nov 29, 2017 at 7:39 pm

    @b.a. freeman:

    “ i do not care for the style of mr. trump.”

    Me neither. But I’m warming up to it a bit.

    “ in all probability, he and i disagree on more things than not…”

    I dunno b.a. I’d take a wager that once the fog was cleared away, you would be surprised at how much you might agree with President Trump.

    “i furthermore consider him to be a loose cannon.”

    Yep. But he’s the only cannon we got.

    Pretty amazing that President Trump fires off a wild, loose cannon tweet and gets the whole world talking about Britain First, the great, previously unknown, British heroine Jayda Fransen AND the brutality of Islam. All this in just one wild shot.

    And just the other day, another loose cannon shot brought up Pocahontas – which of course reminded everyone of the thoroughly corrupt Elizabeth Warren. The fact that this political smack down was hilarious is an added bonus.

    So, relax b.a. get some popcorn, this is getting to be fun!

    GO TRUMP!!

    • Carolyne says

      Nov 30, 2017 at 11:38 am

      Mr Greybeard, how right you are! Mr. Trump says a lot of things I want to say but I do not have a public platform to say them. Loose canon? Ha! Only to the uninitiated.

    • gravenimage says

      Nov 30, 2017 at 9:38 pm

      +1

  33. dumbledoresarmy says

    Nov 29, 2017 at 7:41 pm

    Here is Hugh Fitzgerald on the way in which any critique of Islam, any noticing of the tight correlation between a Muslim presence and Muslim acts of ultra-violent aggression, is shriekingly condemned as “far-right!”.

    http://www.newenglishreview.org/blog_direct_link.cfm?blog_id=66207&cat_id=11&Mancunian%2DMorrissey%2Dv%2DThe%2DGuardian%2DRound%2DOne

    In the course of the article, here are two particularly biting paragraphs.

    “…It’s clear how The Guardian defines “far-right.” It means anyone who is critical of the way the subjects of Muslim terrorists, and Islamic terrorism, and Islam itself, continue to be misrepresented. It means anyone who is critical of Islam, and you are especially “far-right” if your criticism is based on an detailed knowledge of the Qur’an, Hadith, and sira, the texts and teaching of Islam.

    “Such knowledge makes one especially “far-right.”

    “Far-right” applies to anyone who refuses to be cowed by those wielding the lexical scimitar “Islamophobic.” It means anyone who is anti-Islam, no matter how far-left in every other respect that person might be.

    “Is the rock musician Morrissey “far-right”? When did he become so? Just the other day, when he said the unsayable on his Facebook page?

    “Are Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Robert Spencer, Ibn Warraq far-right?

    “Did Pim Fortuyn or Theo van Gogh or Oriana Fallaci — all of them well known for having always been on the left — suddenly become “far-right” just as soon as they revealed that they were deeply worried about Islam and the swelling numbers of Believers in Europe?

    (And to that list I would add the formidable French intellect, the late Jacques Ellul, whose foreword on Jihad, written for Bat Yeor’s “The Decline of Eastern Christianity Under Islam”, discusses and exposes the centrality of Jihad – armed aggression – in Islam, with admirable clarity and brevity – dda).

    “Can The Guardian not recognize that many people who came to some grim conclusions after studying Islam’s texts, and observing Muslim behavior, never were”far-right”?

    “John Quincy Adams, Tocqueville, Bertrand Russell, Winston Churchill come to mind.

    “Were any of them “far-right”?

    “It’s time retire this calumniating label of the mentally lazy, this Homeric epithet mechanically affixed to anyone who refuses to be delighted at Islamic deeds of murderous “martyrdom,” and for some reason insists that the demographic conquest of the advanced civilization of Europe by those who wish for that civilization’s destruction is not a consummation devoutly to be wished.”

    • eduardo odraude says

      Nov 29, 2017 at 11:55 pm

      Nice citation of Hugh Fitzgerald. Great stuff.

    • Leon Degney says

      Nov 30, 2017 at 4:17 am

      Hear, hear!

    • gravenimage says

      Nov 30, 2017 at 9:40 pm

      Thank you, DDA.

  34. dumbledoresarmy says

    Nov 29, 2017 at 7:55 pm

    American jihadwatchers: send the President some more from another ‘Hugh Fitzgerald’ article.
    It is on the theatre of war that constitutes western Europe. Hugh was writing back in July 2010. His words are even more urgent seven years later.

    http://www.newenglishreview.org/custpage.cfm/frm/67091/sec_id/67091

    “…What about the other great theatre of Jihad, at present conducted through many different instruments other than terrorism or qitaal – that is, Western Europe?

    “Here the problem was entirely avoidable, but not avoided.

    ” It came about because Western leaders, and members of the media, simply assumed that there was no problem with Muslim immigrants, no problem with the ideology of Islam. Now, with some 20-30 million Muslims in the West, they know better, but it is a little late.

    “The Arabs and Muslims like to claim that they were “brought in” to “do the work Europeans wouldn’t do.” This is, with one exception, almost entirely false.

    “That one exception is West Germany, and there, during the economic miracle of Ludwig Ehrhard, Turkish males were encouraged to come, to work as gastarbeiter, juest workers, to send money home, and then, it was assumed, they would leave. Not only did they not leave, but they ultimately were allowed to bring their wives – how many is unclear – and their many many children, and were allowed to stay, and the results you can see in any large German city.

    “But elsewhere, it simply is not true, and has to be repeatedly and firmly rejected, that the Pakistanis were “needed” to open grocery stores and news stands, or that the Algerian Arabs were desperately needed by the French or the Moroccans by the Spanish, or Moroccans and Turks by the Dutch, or Moroccans and Kurds and Turks and other Arabs by Denmark, Sweden, Norway, or Egyptians and Libyans by the Italians.

    “They were not invited in, but they were ineffectively kept out, and they keep coming, by hook and by crook, managing to arrive, where instead of filling a felt economic need, they tend with their plural wives – all of them deliberately uneducated, and mere breeders of children — to become burdens on the state, taking advantage of every conceivable benefit, free health care at a level they could never obtain in a Muslim land, free education, of a kind they could never obtain in a Muslim land, free or heavily subsidized housing, and so on.

    “Polls suggest that most young Arabs in North Africa and the Middle East would leave their own lands for Europe in a minute, if they could, that such emigration is their fondest wish.

    “It is the task of the peoples of Western Europe to keep them out, for unlike refugees from the Nazis and the Communists, who came to warn those who gave them refuge about Nazism and Communism, those who flee the miseries of Muslim lands do not recognize the cause of that misery – Islam itself – and come bearing Islam in their mental baggage, undeclared, then unpack it, to the great woe of those among whom they have come to live, and whose lands they regard as, in a sense, belonging by right to them, as Believers, as the Best of Peoples, and only temporarily to the Infidels who live in them.

    “They are interested in the land, the territory, and all of its wealth, but have no idea what it was that created that wealth, or allowed for good government.

    “In Western Europe, two things can be noted: the first is that the problem with Muslim immigrants is unique and does not occur with any other immigrant group, not Hindus, not Chinese, not non-Muslim black Africans, not Latin American Indians – only with Muslims.

    “And second, the great problem of Muslims is not limited to this or that country, but is observable all over Europe, in every country, and the effects and the distress are most noticeable in two small countries that once upon a time elevated Tolerance and Diversity to the gods of a secular religion, but whose citizens have learned, to their great sorrow, that these ideas have been used to import and protect the bearers, and disseminators, of Intolerance, and Islam itself is the greatest enemy of Diversity – wishing to make the whole world one uninterrupted Dar al-Islam – in human history.”

    Perhaps just that last bit… to repeat (somewhat shortened):

    “In Western Europe, two things can be noted: the first is that the problem with Muslim immigrants is unique and does not occur with any other immigrant group… only with Muslims.

    “And second, the great problem of Muslims is not limited to this or that country, but is observable all over Europe, in every country, and the effects and the distress are most noticeable in two small countries that once upon a time elevated Tolerance and Diversity to the gods of a secular religion, but whose citizens have learned, to their great sorrow, that these ideas have been used to import and protect the bearers, and disseminators, of Intolerance, and Islam itself is the greatest enemy of Diversity – wishing to make the whole world one uninterrupted Dar al-Islam – in human history.”

  35. dumbledoresarmy says

    Nov 29, 2017 at 7:59 pm

    All American jihadwatchers – get behind your President and *push*.

    Encourage him to get a minion or two to double-check videos of Mohammedan misbehaviour; but state clearly that there *are* multiple fact-checked examples out there, of Mohammedan aggression (and also of loud, shrieking Mohammean *incitement* of other Mohammedans to act aggressively, and lots of gloating Mohammedan rants boasting about acts of utter vileness inflicted on helpless non-Muslim victims) that could be set flying through the twitterzone, to make the point that this sh*t is REAL.

    If you have access to some particularly egregious factual examples, supply them. MEMRI might be a good source; I doubt that they reproduce anything they are not 100 percent sure is what it claims to be.

  36. nicholas tesdorf says

    Nov 29, 2017 at 8:00 pm

    President Trump stands on the side of Truth. He stands up for what is right, not what is “politically correct”.Leftist Propaganda. They cannot stand hearing the Truth and try to ban it.

  37. Flavius Claudius Iulianus says

    Nov 29, 2017 at 8:44 pm

    Jayda Fransen! How can you not love her?

    Here’s the same story on Breitbart:
    http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/11/29/trump-retweets-controversial-britain-first-activist-jayda-fransen/

    • gravenimage says

      Nov 29, 2017 at 9:02 pm

      I’ve seen a few videos. She’s brave and principled!

      • Flavius Claudius Iulianus says

        Nov 29, 2017 at 11:38 pm

        This was a major tactical error on the part of the MSM. By profiling Fransen to slander Trump they gave Fransen major publicity launching her to an international level.

  38. Naildriver says

    Nov 29, 2017 at 8:47 pm

    I think those were perhaps Trumps best tweets in a good while.
    He should Tweet some of Robert Spencer’s story lines with attached photos. And, there are many good sources for pictures that catch Muslims doing what Muslims are known to do.
    Trump can order the CIA and state department to back up his correct observation that Islam is this nation’s enemy. And, he should tweet the facts of Islam’s menace; but better, Trump should get on TV and do an hour long program on why Islam is this nation’s and mankind’s enemy; featuring experts as Geert Wilders, Robert Spencer, Ayaan Hirsi Ali and others.
    In fact, get to it, Trump, for God’s sake.

    • Flavius Claudius Iulianus says

      Nov 29, 2017 at 11:40 pm

      I wish he would override Tillerson and put the Ikwan on the terrorist organizations list.

  39. James Snapp, Jr. says

    Nov 29, 2017 at 10:30 pm

    In a sane and reasonable Great Britain, Jeremy Corbyn would either be incarcerated or executed by now.

  40. Infidel says

    Nov 30, 2017 at 1:28 am

    FINALLY THE COLD HARD BITTER TRUTH .. and shockingly (but very welcome) FROM AN ELECTED LEADER ELECTED TO THE HIGHEST OFFICE OF HIS LAND. Now this what is doing the RIGHT THING by the people of his land, esp those that elected him. Wish my leaders here too show these traits. I’m convinced that America will not go wrong with Trump.

  41. Georg says

    Nov 30, 2017 at 2:43 am

    Oh, the attacker of the Dutch boy isn’t Muslim or a migrant? But I thought the ethnicity of criminals was always top secret and never of consequence. Guess there are exceptions.

  42. Vajapeya says

    Nov 30, 2017 at 3:09 am

    Bravo Trump!!. You seem to be the only leader on planet earth who has the gall to do something like this.

    • Chand says

      Dec 1, 2017 at 6:42 am

      Vajapeya, aren’t you Tamil?
      Don’t celebrate so fast. The neo Nazis from the Britain First party whose videos were re-tweeted by Trump, will lynch all Tamils in a heartbeat too if they get a chance! They won’t even bother to find out if you are Muslim!

  43. Leon Degney says

    Nov 30, 2017 at 4:19 am

    Two words “Go Trump!”

  44. p bay says

    Nov 30, 2017 at 5:11 am

    watch “rivers of blood” Done by Brit Enoch Powell. Thrown out with 80% agreeing

  45. p bay says

    Nov 30, 2017 at 5:11 am

    fits with Trump’s snake poem

  46. p bay says

    Nov 30, 2017 at 5:12 am

    Keep Trump out. Its not safe for any civilized person now

  47. Michael McDermott says

    Nov 30, 2017 at 5:30 am

    The UK has been the subject of anti-Trump media manipulation from prior to his election, it has now gone mad!

  48. MFritz says

    Nov 30, 2017 at 5:48 am

    Well, “at least” it can be said that they enforce their “high” standards at all costs – even against the US president.

    Alas, inconvenient truths don’t go away if you censor, ban and even arrest and prosecute the messenger.

  49. FYI says

    Nov 30, 2017 at 6:02 am

    “muslims being violent”?

    Oh come on now{sarc} isn’t that just being racist and “islamophobic”?

  50. Kasey says

    Nov 30, 2017 at 7:26 am

    When naive politicians go after the messenger rather than comprehend the message, what chance does their nation have for its long-term survival? …Next to none!

    • Frank Anderson says

      Nov 30, 2017 at 2:42 pm

      Kasey, I made the change (I hate the overused word “transition”) several years after 9/11, from swallowing the misguided, uninformed and deceptive crap of the “religion of peace”. I felt like a fool when I found out just how far wrong that mantra is. It has been 16 plus years, with literally thousands of attacks and tens of thousands of murders worldwide to show the lie from 16 years ago, Anyone who buys the “religion of peace” is deliberately ignorant of the truth. I can’t resist quoting a case, oddly from the frequently overruled 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, “Deliberate ignorance constitutes knowledge of the truth.” Wyle v. R.J.Reynolds, 709 F.2d 585 (9th Cir. 1983). The people who are lying to us, endangering not only our liberty but also our lives and property when they continue to pump the “religion of peace” story, have no excuse for not knowing the truth after 16 bloody years, not to mention 1400 years’ of perfectly consistent experience. Where in all 1400 years has islam contributed once to world peace or progress?

  51. Ibrahim itace muhammed says

    Nov 30, 2017 at 8:19 am

    Trump is an idiot madman possessed by the Satan (Holy Spirit). He knows that his evil United States and evil Saudi Royal funded terrorism with his mastes'(the evil Zionists) coordination .It is the Satan (Holy Spirit) inspiring him to hate Islam.

    • Jayell says

      Nov 30, 2017 at 8:57 am

      And there speaks a true follower of that Dark Age, illiterate criminal paedophile whose main claim to fame seems to be that he succeeded in conning every gullible peasant in creation into bolstering his illegitimate political career by kidding them that he was some kind of ‘Prophet’ – and in the process instituting the world’s longest-running pseudo-religious farce. Well done, Mr. Muhammed, you are indeed the model of intellectual integrity. Just one thing. Here is a dictionary definition of ‘Paganism’:-

      ‘Paganism is a term first used in the fourth century by early Christianity for populations of the Roman Empire who practiced polytheism, either because they were increasingly rural and provincial relative to the Christian population or because they were not milites Christi.’

      Just in case your Latin isn’t up to it, Mr Muhammed, ‘milites Christi’ in English means ‘soldiers of Christ’ – which means that a ‘pagan’ is ipso facto NOT a ‘Christian’, as indeed all the rest of the world seems to be aware. Try doing your homework, mate. That’s if you can read English better than you apparently write it.

      PS – Have you replied to my other posts yet?

    • LeftisruiningCanada says

      Nov 30, 2017 at 2:27 pm

      What a confused and incoherent mess of a belief “system’ Ibrahim seems to have acquired – the Holy Spirit, which is satan, is in President Trump, who is working with the Saudis to perform acts of terrorism at the behest of the Jews!

      Incredible.

      Because it couldn’t possibly be that, instead of the mad ‘red string map on the wall’ construct Ibrahim holds to, it is simply the actions of people who take the koran seriously, could it?

      Because, as we all know, it’s not as if the muhammad we learn about in the sunnah didn’t make it quite clear what good muslims were supposed to do……

      Ibrahim, it’s unlikely you will be able to even come close to approaching the subject with any objectivity, but seriously, is it so hard to see that it’s the muslims and islam that are causing the problems? Don’t you see that its islam that won’t let anyone be at peace? Why is there always fighting and murder and gang tactics wherever islam goes?

      You want to see a Jewish conspiracy behind muslims murdering and blowing things up, while ignoring the very text that tells you its good to do that.
      Everybody else just sees the plain reality that muslims are murdering and blowing things up because their own cherished religious texts say it’s good to do so.

      No one is going to believe your version Ibrahim, because its always muslims attacking everybody else – they’re like the violent kid at school, always causing problems.
      If muslims were the ones sitting quietly and peacefully by and were always being attacked for minding their own business, you might get an audience.

      But that’s not the case, is it. Not by a long way.

    • gravenimage says

      Nov 30, 2017 at 9:45 pm

      How could anyone not possessed by ‘Satan’ hate Islam?

      After all, it sacralizes things like marrying small children, enslaving people, using Infidel women as sex slaves, stoning rape victims to death, and mass slaughtering anyone who does not submit to it.

      What’s not to like? sarc/off

  52. Ibrahim itace muhammed says

    Nov 30, 2017 at 8:24 am

    Trump is an idiot madman possessed by the Satan (Holy Spirit). it is the Satan(holy spirit) inspiring him to hate Islam. He is deliberately repeating lies concocted by evil Christian Evangelists to save their pagan creed

    • Theophilus says

      Nov 30, 2017 at 8:48 am

      How dare you insult my religion in this manner. You are claiming that the Holy Spirit is Satan. If I wrote such things about Islam, you buddies would be rioting in the streets looking for some unfortunate Christian to lynch. This is utter hypocrisy.

      Isaiah 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!

    • Norger says

      Nov 30, 2017 at 8:49 am

      Well reasoned and persuasive. What a silver tongue you are.

      • Jayell says

        Nov 30, 2017 at 9:01 am

        Jayell says

        Nov 30, 2017 at 8:57 am

        (Sorry. I put this reply in wrong place, so here it is again. Mr. Muhammed can now read it TWICE!!!)

        And there speaks a true follower of that Dark Age, illiterate criminal paedophile whose main claim to fame seems to be that he succeeded in conning every gullible peasant in creation into bolstering his illegitimate political career by kidding them that he was some kind of ‘Prophet’ – and in the process instituting the world’s longest-running pseudo-religious farce. Well done, Mr. Muhammed, you are indeed the model of intellectual integrity. Just one thing. Here is a dictionary definition of ‘Paganism’:-

        ‘Paganism is a term first used in the fourth century by early Christianity for populations of the Roman Empire who practiced polytheism, either because they were increasingly rural and provincial relative to the Christian population or because they were not milites Christi.’

        Just in case your Latin isn’t up to it, Mr Muhammed, ‘milites Christi’ in English means ‘soldiers of Christ’ – which means that a ‘pagan’ is ipso facto NOT a ‘Christian’, as indeed all the rest of the world seems to be aware. Try doing your homework, mate. That’s if you can read English better than you apparently write it.

        PS – Have you replied to my other posts yet?

        • Theophilus says

          Nov 30, 2017 at 9:11 am

          In the twisted thinking of Islam, Christians ARE pagans. In truth of course, the Muhammadans are the real pagans. The Kabba was the home of 360 idols, until Allah had the other 359 destroyed. But remember Allah is the great deceiver. The God of the Bible is truth. Jesus is the way, the truth and the life (John 14:6).

          Moslem readers, how do YOU know that you are not being deceived by Allah, who is the great deceiver according to your Koran?

          Well written comment, Jayell. Thanks.

        • Ibrahim itace muhammed says

          Nov 30, 2017 at 3:31 pm

          Jayell, Christianity taught by true Jesus (Issa) was mixed with Roman paganism of mithraism at Nicea 325 years after Jesus’ departure from this earth .Are you aware of that?

        • LeftisruiningCanada says

          Nov 30, 2017 at 10:03 pm

          Let’s have some proof of that Ibrahim.

          I know you won’t give any, because there isn’t any to give.

        • gravenimage says

          Nov 30, 2017 at 11:10 pm

          As Ibrahim itace muhammed would have it, Jesus is not the Savior–he is not a healer or a peacemaker, either.

          Instead, his main role in Islam is to *murder Christians”.

    • LeftisruiningCanada says

      Nov 30, 2017 at 2:42 pm

      If Ibrahim isn’t a master troll, i’d be surprised.

      But it’s still interesting to reply…

      “it is the Satan(holy spirit) inspiring him to hate Islam”

      I can see how it might seem that way to you, since your idea of what is good and bad has been so corrupted by your exposure to the very real evil of islam.

      But tell me, why do you so focus on the idea that the Holy Spirit is satan? You do know that Jesus sent the HS, right? He said so in the Injil. the HS led people to say great praises about God, and to give their lives in the course of telling people about God.

      You will notice that in the New Testament, those with the Holy Spirit didn’t murder, or rape, or enslave, or steal or torture anyone. Ever.

      And yet you would have us believe that muhammad, a murdering, raping, thieving, torturous slave master is a better example of how God wants us to be?

      Can you see how from our perspective, with the example of Christ and His followers before us, it isn’t easy to accept your position on this?

      Can you also see why, since islam would have you do all the things that muhammad did, and sets his example as the goal and pinnacle of human life, it is much easier for us to regarding islam as evil?

      You must see how the koran is evil, that the life of muhammad shows all the signs of evil influence, and that the fruit of muhammad down to this very day, shows mostly and consistently, evil?

      • LeftisruiningCanada says

        Nov 30, 2017 at 7:33 pm

        Also, you do know that many muslims claim that the Holy Spirit, also known as the Comforter, is muhammad, don’t you? (John 14, and 16)

        Do you really want to say that muhammad is satan, or the spirit of satan?

        I’d agree, if you did.

      • gravenimage says

        Nov 30, 2017 at 11:12 pm

        Ibrahim itace muhammed does not believe in Jesus–he believes in the Muslim “Isa”, who is a vicious figure that has nothing to do with the Jesus of the Gospels.

        • LeftisruiningCanada says

          Dec 1, 2017 at 11:16 pm

          Completely agree GI. There have been many false Christs (and false Gospels, and false Holy Spirits) taught through the centuries, exactly like the Holy Spirit led Paul said there was even in his time:

          “For if one comes and preaches another Jesus whom we have not preached, or you receive a different spirit which you have not received, or a different gospel which you have not accepted, you bear this beautifully.”
          2 Corinthians 11:4

          The arabs listening to mohammad were another group who bore the teaching about a false Jesus “beautifully”. If they had checked with some Christians, all of this could have been avoided.

  53. UNCLE VLADDI says

    Nov 30, 2017 at 1:17 pm

    Nobody is believably claiming the muslim who attacked the crippled Dutch boy isn’t a muslim – those who pretend he isn’t a muslim are using the most retarded logical fallacies I have ever seen to justify their claims: “He was born in the Netherlands, so he can’t be a muslim!” as if all muslims have to be born in islamic countries! Naturally, the Dutch cops and prosecution service refuse to name him at all (probably because his name is some version of “MUHAMMAD”)!

    Someone should ask Geert Wilders to investigate this!

    • gravenimage says

      Nov 30, 2017 at 11:16 pm

      He is certainly Middle Eastern-looking. While Islam is not a race, statistically most people in the Netherlands from the Middle East and the Mahgreb are Muslims.

  54. Jack R Maxwell says

    Nov 30, 2017 at 5:39 pm

    So the big question I have was the savage that attacked the boy on crutches is not whether or not he was an immigrant, but is he a Muslim? The Dutch police response to this question is suspicious. They will not answer what his religion is in order to not provoke anti-Islamic feelings.

    • Michael McDermott says

      Nov 30, 2017 at 6:08 pm

      That is typical throughout Northern Europe!

    • LeftisruiningCanada says

      Dec 1, 2017 at 11:19 pm

      Even more important than the perps confessed religion, is whether he attacked *because* of his religion.

      Did he do it because of the korans commands to subjugate the unbelievers?

      That’s the question that Europe can’t ask.

  55. patriotliz says

    Nov 30, 2017 at 9:24 pm

    I guess all those terrorist videos of Muslims being violent aren’t for real and have NOTHING to do w/ Islam.
    Jayda was arrested because UK enforces IslamoFascistic sharia law against anyone who criticizes Islam and those Muslims who follow Islam’s hateful teachings. This is her speech for which she was arrested…soon to be taken down by youtube as “hate speech:”

    • LeftisruiningCanada says

      Dec 1, 2017 at 10:27 pm

      No wonder this woman and the group she speaks for is the new enemy of the British state.

      I’m moved to head there and support them, and i live in Canada.

      This is how it happens.

      • LeftisruiningCanada says

        Dec 1, 2017 at 10:31 pm

        The difference that makes people like her effective…..it sounds like she gives damn.

  56. Tammy Swofford says

    Nov 30, 2017 at 10:05 pm

    The Trump re-tweets are mere child’s play compared to some of the Jihadi Twitter feeds that I have looked at just this evening. The hatred – can be practically palpable.

    There is a huge problem. And until we openly discuss these things and demand accountability things will continue along in same fashion.

    • LeftisruiningCanada says

      Dec 1, 2017 at 10:29 pm

      Exactly. But who ends up arrested and hounded by Her Majesties Finest?

      Not the represent ivies of an invading army bent on destruction, that’s for sure.

      • LeftisruiningCanada says

        Dec 1, 2017 at 10:29 pm

        oy oy, “representatives”

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • revereridesagain on Erdogan: ‘Turks must defend the rights of Jerusalem, even with their lives’ for ‘the honor of the Islamic nation’
  • James Lincoln on Erdogan: ‘Turks must defend the rights of Jerusalem, even with their lives’ for ‘the honor of the Islamic nation’
  • Carol on Greece, Cyprus, Egypt, France and UAE conduct joint military exercises amid rising Turkish threat
  • James Lincoln on EU Parliament members call for firing of border agency director for preventing illegal migrants from entering Europe
  • Jayme on Canadian Mental Health Association studies Muslim women’s mental health due to ‘discrimination’ and ‘hate crimes’

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.