This new Glazov Gang episode was joined by Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Fellow at the Freedom Center and editor of The Point at Frontpagemag.com.
Daniel discusses Halloween Horror – What “Allahu Akbar” Really Means, revealing what the establishment media doesn’t want you to know.
Don’t miss it!
Subscribe to the Glazov Gang‘s YouTube Channel.
Please donate through our Pay Pal account to help The Glazov Gang keep going. Thank you!
Benedict says
Jamie Glazov repeatedly mentions the Leftists and their alliance with Islam in this videoclip:
Here is a poetic and encouraging picture of the fate awaiting the Left riding the beast of Islam:
“There once was a lady from Riga who rode with a smile on a tiger. They came back from the ride with the lady inside and the smile on the face of the tiger.”
It’s my humble opinion that the name of the “lady from Rīga” was Jezebel – alternatively: Hillary(?) Linda(?)
Phil says
What ever happened to guy that they caught who killed the imam in Ozone Park, Queens a year ago? Rumors were that this imam was preaching tolerance of infidels.
http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/drive-by-shooter-queens-gravely-injures-men-article-1.2749901
Michael Copeland says
Media silence.
PATRICIA FRANCES KOENIG says
Thank you for this information on the real meaning of “Allahu Akbar.” Since it really means “Allah is greatER” than your deity….it reveals how competitive and supremacist Islam is. And it proves that Islam does NOT worship the same God as Christians and Jews.
Michael Copeland says
When Islamic State’s men demolished the tomb of St. Elian at the monastery they explained;
“It is dedicated to a god other than Allah”.
Dave says
You are living in the time of the antichrist
ConanKong says
Claiming Allahu Akbar has some innocuous meaning is like saying the Swastica is a symbol of peace. Not anymore.
FYI says
It means..”Will you please put me out of my misery..?”
PRCS says
Greenfield, as usual, tells it like it is, with a correction:
Replace “Islamic” with Muslim.
Islam’s texts teach/encourage/exhort/command acts of terror against the kuffar and insufficiently compliant Muslims.
It is Muslims who carry that out.
Jack Diamond says
Sure there’s a distinction between Islam and Muslim people and in the degree to which they are lax Muslims. We value the individual. We want to think all people are like us “breathe the same air, love their children” etc. But Islam does not value the individual.
There may be a distinction between more Islam or less Islam in the life of a Muslim (always oscillating) but not of different kinds of Islam. Further, all these lax Muslims (or what we like to assume are ignorant Muslims who somehow don’t know the contents of their own religion as much as we do!) are part of a collective, a body, the ummah.
The ummah is what matters, not the individual. The ummah has a collective body and brain that submits to Islam and carries out its directives. Even lax Muslims are required to contribute to it (and a portion of mandatory zakat is required to go to mujahideen waging jihad). Even lax Muslims contribute to the more insidious facets of jihad and hijrah, toward removing the obstacles to the spread of Islam and the Islamization of infidel societies. One aspect of removing those obstacles is the hoodwinking of infidels as to the true teachings of Islam and the true feelings of Muslims. Lying is so deeply engrained and so absolutely doctrinal, it becomes impossible to separate the sincerely ignorant Muslim from the whitewashing Muslim and both serve the same purpose when it comes to protecting Islam and the ummah from the kuffar. By thoroughly confusing them.
The first duty of the Muslim is to proclaim the innocence of Islam and Muslims. To turn any accusations around to where the victims of Islam become the ones “who started it” and become the ones who prey on and oppress the Muslims. Defense of Islam involves exonerating it from any blame, from accusations of violence or terrorism, to turn the tables on its accusers.
Promotion of Islam involves spreading the da’wa of a peaceful, tolerant Islam and peaceful, tolerant Muslim people. The Meccan verses. The dissembling. Muslim people besieged, victimized by bigotry and hatred, unfairly stigmatized by association with a few bad apples (well, figs), managing to turn the mourning over our dead into concern for the fears of all the poor, nice Muslims.
It is the first duty of Muslims in dar al-Harb to whitewash Islam and blow smoke into the eyes of the kaffir. Since it is a duty, it becomes very hard to distinguish your nice Muslims and your not so nice Muslims, just to prove you are not prejudiced. Not to mention your nice Muslim today may become not so nice tomorrow, just by suddenly taking his beliefs seriously. Or that his children might never be nice because Islam is not nice, it is lethal. It is war.
Isn’t it so much easier, and safer, to just keep the ummah OUT?
This summary of our situation with Muslims is provided by ex-Muslim, Ali Sina:
“All Muslims believe in every word of the Quran. No Muslim will denounce a single word of the Quran. You don’t have to be Aristotle or an expert in syllogism and deductive reasoning to put the two together and come to the conclusion that you should not trust Muslims. All of them lie. All of them are deceitful. They even lie to me and think they can get away with it. For Muslims lying to advance their faith is a holy deed. It is woven in their psyche. They grow with it and do it naturally. Just as you are taught to smile when your eyes lock with the eyes of a stranger, Muslims are taught to lie to non-Muslims.
There are no moderate Muslims. There are also no radical Muslims. All Muslims believe in the same book, every word of it. They just practice it to different extents. We call those who follow their faith to the letter radical and the wish-washy ones moderate. There is only one Islam: The Islam of Muhammad and the Quran. It is the only Islam that matters. The rest is a bunch of lies. This Islam is violent. It instructs the believer to lie to the unbelievers, to cast terror in their hearts and to murder them.”
Keys says
Jack, your post needs to be repeated at least weekly for occasional and “drop-in” JW readers.
No muslim, ally or not, should be allowed to immigrate to a non-muslim country.
No mosques.
Never trust a muslim.
Extreme vetting is impossible and useless.
David says
The best thing we can do to effect a change is to publish openly, the 109 verses of evil in the Koran.
Take a look at this: http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/quran/violence.aspx
PRCS says
“There are no moderate Muslims. There are also no radical Muslims.”
No moderate Islam. No radical Islam.
The best efforts of politicians and “journalists” to the contrary–no Muslim practices “radical” Islam.
gravenimage says
Glazov Gang: Halloween Horror – What “Allahu Akbar” Really Means
…………………..
Thanks, Daniel Greenfield.
BlueRaven says
Could this pannel explain the following please: They all agree not all Muslims are terrorists, period. What I consider a terrorist is a person/group who are religiously/ideologically orientated and typically they attempt to inflict as many casualties as possible of innocent bystanders. In their mind his or their use of loss of life is irrelevant, and for their cause more casualties are better. Losses among their co-religionists are of no significant.
There is only ONE religion that condones such acts openly, written in B&W, in their utmost believed textual document and their hallmark is terror – which is Islam.
All Muslims are follower of that ideology. Obviously, a Buddist does not follow the Suras in Kuran.
Hence, aint all Muslims potential terrorists? Of course, they are people like any of us. But normal person will not go out to cause terror – i.e. kill as many innocent people as possible to terrorrise other people’s mind to achieve their goal, which is submission to their ideology. Only a Muslim will do that willingly. Where do we stand with all Muslims?
David says
AMAT but ATAM. All muslims aren’t….. I think you can guess the rest.