John Hamed, Jr. is the public relations officer of the Islamic Society of New Castle, Ohio, who wrote a letter, purporting to correct misperceptions about Islam, to the New Castle News:
We write this to take exception to the letter published Oct. 4 in the New Castle News, titled “America not the place for Muslims.”
The writer obviously considered himself an expert on the text of Islam’s Holy Book, the Koran (sic). He quotes verses from Al-Qu’ran without any historical or contextual knowledge, and concludes that Muslims do not belong in America.
The Bible contains many verses of extreme violence, but does this disparage [sic] the whole of Christianity? Of course not. The writer can neither translate nor explain properly the verses he quoted. These verses were allowances from God for the early Muslims to defend themselves against the relentless onslaught of horrors served upon them by their enemies and idol worshippers. Without those allowances, Muslims would have perished.
How does John Hamed, Jr. know that the writer to whom he objects “can [not] translate…properly the verses he quoted”? Does Hamed know the Arabic of the Qur’an? And does he not realize that the verses quoted by that writer were not translated by him, but taken from one of the accepted translations of the Qur’an into English?
More disturbing is Hamed’s failure to distinguish between prescription and description. The Bible contains descriptions of violence limited in time and place, but does not prescribe open-ended violence by Christians. The Qur’an, however, prescribes extreme violence, commanding Believers to engage in Jihad warfare against all Unbelievers; these commands are in force until the entire world succumbs to Islam. These commands were not, as Mr. Hamed wants us to believe, temporary “allowances from God for the early Muslims”; nor do 1.5 billion Muslims, who are taught that the Qur’anic verses are valid everywhere and for all time, agree, as John Hamed, Jr. insists, that they are limited in time and place.
Nor was there, as John Hamed, Jr. claims, any “relentless onslaught of horrors served upon [the early Muslims]”; the “relentless onslaught” was entirely by, not against, Muslims. Islam was a fighting faith that was imposed, in a ferocious fashion, through warfare, first in Arabia, and within sixty years of the death of Muhammad ,that “relentless onslaught” by Muslims brought vast territories, including Iraq (the first victim of Muslim Arab jihad), and the Sassanian Empire of Persia, in the east, and Egypt, and then most of North Africa, in the west, under Islamic control.
“The writer fails to mention any of the 156 verses of mercy in the Qu’ran (2:182, 7:51, 12:92, 23:118) or the 65 verses of peace (2:182, 4:90, 6:127, 8:61, 49:9) or the 93 verses of love (2:195, 3:31, 4:36, 19:96).
“Mercy” and “peace” and “love” in the Qur’an are directed at fellow Muslims, or describe Allah; they are not directed at Unbelievers. “Allah is forgiving and merciful” ends 2:182, which is what the writer would have us believe is a “verse of [universal] mercy,” though Allah is “forgiving and merciful” only to Believers. When Allah is described as the “Most Merciful” — toward Believers — as in 19:96, this is treated by John Hamed, Jr. as a “verse of love,” but again, it is directed only to Believers. While 49:9 is about making “peace,” that “peace” is only between Believers. “Mercy,” “peace,” and “love” do not apply to Unbelievers except insofar as those Unbelievers are inclined either to convert (revert) to Islam, or to fully accept the status of dhimmi under Muslim masters. Mr. Hamed has simply gone to an online concordance to the Qur’an, found where the words “mercy,” “peace,” and “love” and their variants appear, listed those verses, and paid no attention to whom those sentiments are supposed to be directed. If he had done so, he would have understood how unrelenting Islam remains in inculcating hatred of those Unbelievers who refuse either to convert to Islam, or to submit, as dhimmis, to subjugation by Muslims.
Briefly, Islam teaches the worship of One God and it accepts the prophecies of Moses and Jesus and others mentioned in the scriptures. There are 7 million American Muslims, half of whom are U.S.-born. We are educated, middle-class citizens who work in every profession. America is our home, and we’re not going anywhere.
This statement misleads in several ways. Muslims, Christians, and Jews are all monotheists, but the Allah of Islam is a much more violent and uncompromising figure than the God of the Christians or the Jehovah of the Jews. Hamed wishes readers to believe in that soothing untruth that “we all worship the same God.” We don’t. The Muslim Allah is long on war, short on peace, long on hatred, short on love; the Christian God is the exact opposite. The Qur’an, with its emphasis on warfare, conquest, subjugation of Infidel enemies, with its rules for dividing up loot, including both property and sex slaves, is a very different text from the Christian Bible. As far as Islam accepting Moses and Jesus as prophets, that is true, but they are understood in ways quite different from what Christians believe. The “prophecy” of Moses that Islam accepts is that of Deuteronomy 18:18, where Muslims believe he is foretelling the appearance of “the Prophet Muhammad,” while Christians take his “prophecy” as referring to the appearance of Christ. And in Islam, Jesus is only a “prophet” and not the Son of God, as Christians believe. Muhammad, while the “Perfect Man,” is still just a man, a mere mortal. Thus do Muslims avoid the sin of “shirk” (polytheism, idolatry), ascribing a “partner” to God, of which Christians, who take Jesus to be the Son of God, are guilty.
Notice, too, the writer’s unsubstantiated claim that “there are 7 million Muslims in America.” According to the Pew Research Foundation, there are 3.35 Muslims in the United States as of August 2017, or less than half the number so casually claimed by John Hamed, Jr. He offers no source for his figure, for there is none. The attempt to exaggerate the number, and hence the perceived power, of Muslims, is a staple of Muslim propaganda. Hamed is hoping that his readers will not bother to check; he may well, alas, be right.
The bizarre claim Hamed makes, based solely on Fell’s wild remarks about Muslims being “the descendants of the Muslim visitors of North America [who] are members of the present Iroquois, Algonquin, Anasazi, Hohokam and Olmec native people,” has to be understood as one more attempt to backdate a Muslim presence in America, as if that were itself a guarantee of “belonging” in America, by being more connected to the indigenous Indians than are the descendants of the comparatively late arrivals from Europe.
What of John Hamed, Jr.’s claim that “we [Muslims] are educated, middle-class citizens who work in every profession.” That is no guarantee of good behavior. Muslim terrorists are on the whole better educated, and better off economically than the average Muslim, as noted in this report by Giulio Meotti. Osama bin Laden came from a family of billionaires. Ayman al-Zawahiri, a doctor, came from one of the most prominent and prosperous families in Egypt. We have all read of the doctors, lawyers, professors, students at good universities, who went off to join the Islamic state. Telling us that Muslims are economically “middle-class” is no reason for us to feel relieved. The “middle-class” Dr. Nidal Hasan, who had had his medical education paid for entirely by the Army, and was earning $90,000 a year, remained unswayed in his murderous hatred of Infidels. “Mike” Hawash, who was convicted in 2003 of trying to help his fellow Muslims in the Taliban, had been earning $360,000 as an Intel engineer. Aafia Siddiqui had attended MIT, had a Ph.D. in neuroscience from Brandeis, and a brilliant career before her when she decided to trade it all for life as “Lady Al-Qaida.” There are many more such examples.
Perhaps sensing that he has not won us over with his claims about the Qur’an’s contents — all that mercy, love, and peace — nor disabused us of our fears about Muslims by insisting that they are “well-educated and middle-class,” nor impressed us with the claims that they arrived in America 800 years before Columbus, he ends the first part of his letter with the unpleasantly defiant “we are not going anywhere.”
That defiant note that Mr. Hamed adds, that “we [Muslims] are not going anywhere” sounds disturbingly like a challenge: “just you try to get rid of us, no matter what we believe, or how we act.” It does not sound like the sentiment of someone trying to decrease “divisiveness.” He might have written “we are glad to be here, and we love what this country offers us.” Instead he offered, tellingly, a veiled threat: “we are not going anywhere.”
Matthieu Baudin says
“… Islam was a fighting faith that was imposed, in a ferocious fashion, through warfare, first in Arabia, and within sixty years of the death of Muhammad ,that “relentless onslaught” by Muslims brought vast territories, including Iraq (the first victim of Muslim Arab jihad), and the Sassanian Empire of Persia, in the east, and Egypt, and then most of North Africa, in the west, under Islamic control…”
Lest we forget!
mortimer says
Danish researcher Tina Magaard, Ph.D. concluded that Islam is the MOST WARLIKE RELIGION by the frequency of terrorism and violence in its primary source texts. After three years analyzing the original texts of ten different religions, Tina Magaard concluded that the Islamic texts stand out by encouraging terror and violence to a larger degree than other religions do. She stated that ‘Islamic texts encourage terror and fighting to a far larger degree than the original texts of other religions. The texts in Islam distinguish themselves from the texts of other religions by encouraging violence and aggression against people with other religious beliefs to a larger degree.’
“What is striking is not in itself that one can find murderous passages in the Islamic texts, as such passages can also be found in other religions. But it is striking how much space these passages take up in the Islamic texts, and how much they focus on an us-and-them logic in which infidels and apostates are characterized as dirty, rotten, criminal, hypocritical and dangerous. It is also striking how much these texts demand that the reader fight the infidels, both with words and with the sword. In many passages, Muhammad plays a central role as one who encourages the use of violence, whether it comes to stonings, beheadings, acts of war or execution of critics and poets.”
Dr. Magaard finds it particularly objectionable that so many Islamic scholars knowingly fail to disclose these facts, and use their positions of power to create restrictive standards for what you can say about Islam.
Darth says
My father’s friend while I was growing up was Siek(sp? No disrespect). I was always told that it was a warrior religion because it advocated extreme retaliation against evil. I was raised fundamental Baptist being told no matter what turn the other cheek and forgive instantly.
I am no scholar and only know the religion as people practiced it that I met and knew but … men and women are equal but different and all people are deserving of protection of the sieks regardless of thier religion. One of thier pillars of faith is a sword they carry at all times that reminds them that all people are deserving protection.
I found the way they treated thier women unusual because the men were so big and the women so shirt and dainty and the men were always in discussion with them and thier women were not allowed to be struck in any way … different from fundamental Baptist where the man was the head of the household and had final word. The way he taught me to protect not only myself but also any person who was being who was being wronged because in thier religion to see it or know that a person is being wronged without doing anything makes one just as guilty as the one doing it. They must react or they are condemned with the sin along with the person that has committed it.
Asatru is the religion that encompassed the Odin hierarchy of Gods and is considered a warrior religion and demands action to protect someone who is being wronged. Thier women were in politics until Catholics converted all of them. Women were equal but different. Asatru is considered a warrior religion.
Shaolin monks on China were the ultimate warriors and generals and created chen Buddhism which evolved to zen Buddhism and they were a warrior religion. Thier spirituality is based on on bot war and peace to find harmony and they are very effective warriors.
Before Buddhism Chinese martial artists were taoists and the Dao was considered a warrior religion as they were the best generals and learned medicine to heal as well as make them more effective killers.
The knights templar were the seals, delta, green barret commandos of the papal army and by far were the most effective fighting force and they were and are called monks.
There is a societal shitlft in western civilizations to demonize warriors which is a very new thing. The warrior religions are religions that have morals and values around violence and prescriptions of violence as limits the violence. As I was very young when introduced to sieks where they are exceptional warriors for everything good regardless of the religion for which the victim comes from it shaped my views of military and veterans who try to organize to defeat the enemies of our country.
For the record, I was told that almost all the sieks I met fled India because of perpetual war with the Muslims. This was before India separated into India and Pakistan where I was told Muslims on one side and everyone else on the other. The Hindu I know respect other religions and generally are at peace with Buddhists sieks and Christians but those damn Muslims had the sieks running from India to survive.
My point is to remind everyone that warriors and warriors religions are not evil but the Muslims have perverted religion into racial(Arab Muslims are higher than everyone else) and religious supremacy, something that the other religions don’t have aside from hitlerism.
God bless all of our warriors in this war with Islam and the Muslims who are trying to destroy us. May God bless our warrior monks with knowledge strength and power to expose the evils of Islam and destroy the soldiers of this war.
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
Sikh is a person of the religion, Sikhism is the religion’s name.
eduardo odraude says
No expert on Sikhism, but I vaguely recall that it is an offshoot of Hinduism, but emphasizes oneness and developed a warlike component precisely in order to be able to defend against Islamic aggression and supremacism. Sikhs are fine in my book because they have no totalitarian ambitions and their holy books don’t inculcate hatred of unbelievers. In short, Sikhism is nothing like Islam.
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
Yeah, my understanding is that Sikhism is a hybrid of Hinduism and Islam. One wonders what motivated them to water down Islam, but doing that was an inherently good thing. We need that to happen with all Moslems.
Linnte says
Sihk (sp) are not in any way involved in Islam. They abhor Islam, and came into being as the warriors for Hinduism as Hindus do not believe in killing/fighting.
Vajapeya says
Yes you are right eduardo. It was the religion which opposed the tyrannical mughal rule in India. Many of its teachers and Guru’s were put to death by Muslim tyrants like Aurangazeb. There were Hindu kings like Shivaji, Krishna Deva Raya who literally save India. If not for these people, India would have become an Islamic nation and we would all be genuflecting to Mecca 5 times daily. Bharat Maata ki Jai.
maghan says
One mistake that many people ,make is to confuse the Old Testament and the New Testament. Christianity begins with the New Testament. Christians read the Old Testament as relating to traditional Judaism–the religion of the Jews. The OT offers a folkloric prologue to how Christianity was founded–not much more.
The descriptive violence in the Bible finds its proper province in the OT not the NT.
Linnte says
I think you’re not quite correct about the Old Testament. There are more than 300 prophesys about the coming Messiah in Old Testament, and prophesy about the end of days too. One cannot understand the Revelations without a good understanding of Old Testament prophesy. Remember, even in Genesis, God declared the coming of the Savior as one who would bruise the heel of Satan.
It is understanding the different genere of scripture, ie. Stories, Prophesy, poetry, and history, without which we would have no clue what the New Testament is telling us. Understanding Gospel, like when Jesus said, “before Abraham was, I am” is a reference to Jesus being YHWH in the flesh, would not be discernable without Old Testament. And lastly, remember, the WHOLE of the Bible is about the culmination of God’s plan for humanity. That Jesus was born, lived, died and was ressurected to save humanity so we can be in His Kingdom for eternity.
gravenimage says
Your implication that Jews are violent, and that this is due to the Old Testament (Torah) is quite mistaken. Where are Jews violent today?
Dacritic says
“If you have seen me, you have seen the Father.”
So nope, the OT is not just a folkloric prologue, at least not to me. That then begs the question: the God of the NT tells people to love their enemies while the God of the OT tells his people to wipe out certain races. And how then could Jesus utter the quote above?
Anyone who wants to find out on a deeper level on why the God of the OT commands the extermination of those certain races, I recommend watching Rob Skiba or Tim Alberino. The reason links the OT and the NT like never before.
mortimer says
Statistically, there is more violent text in the Koran than in any other religious text. The main ‘argument’ of the Koran is that Kafirs commit a crime by disbelieving in Mohammed, so they should be treated violently. The 164 jihad verses in the Koran prove Islam preaches violence against disbelievers.
The verse of the SWORD (9:5) is said to ABROGATE about 100 ‘peaceful’ verses from the early 2/3 of the Koran. “Fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them: seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war).”
The entire religion of Islam prepares a Muslim for VIOLENCE. The yearly animal sacrifices teach children to become desensitized to throat-cutting. Women and girls are beaten. Muslims who visit Mecca must throw stones at a stone pillar a preparation to throw them at people. This act further teaches them that VIOLENCE is a RELIGIOUS DUTY.
The example of Mohammed is the core of Islam. Mohammed’s violent example was documented in detail by his admiring and unashamed Muslim biographers: surprise raids on trade caravans and tribal settlements, the use of plunder so obtained for recruiting an ever growing army of greedy desperados, assassinations of opponents, blackmail, extortion, torture, expulsion and massacre of the Jews of Medina, attacks upon and enslavement of the Jews of Khaybar, rape of women and children, sale of these victims after rape, trickery, treachery and bribery employed to their fullest extent, to grow the numbers of his religion Islam which ironically is supposed to mean “peace”! Mohammed organized no less than 86 expeditions, 26 of which he led himself…a violent act EVERY 6 WEEKS in the last 9 years of his life. Mohammed was finally murdered by his followers. Then, his followers murdered one another and so it continues in Islam until this day.
The sacred nature of violence Islam is also spelled out in the hadiths:
“Narrated ‘Abdullah bin Abi Aufa: Allah’s Apostle said, “Know that Paradise is under the shades of swords.” Bukhari Vol. 4, Book 52, Num. 73.
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
Fitzgerald, you are confused analyst ,yet you consider John to have misconceptions and failure to draw a distinction between violence contained in the evil satanic Bible and jihad in the Quran. such things like descriptive not prescriptive events contained in the mithraist Bible is a myth created by Christian apologists, not true theological interpretation of the Bible. verses like Samuel 15:3 have relied upon by the church and waged religious war of genocide on Muslims. During American invasion of Iraq unexploded cluster bombs were found bearing evil biblical verses and the war was truly waged as crusade, according to Bush. You can Continue with your deception, we will never accept it.
Evosse1314 says
You are an absolute Richard Head.
JawsV says
It’s the Koran verses that are evil, Mohammedan.
gravenimage says
Of course, Bush never said any such thing, nor are there Biblical verses on American bombs.
Really, this is nothing but projection.
martin says
I suspect many muslims are aware they worship and obey SATAN.
Benedict says
“The Bible contains many verses of extreme violence, but does this disparage [sic] the whole of Christianity?” –
Islam is a contorted plagiary of the law of Moses, renamed sharia, combined with the conquest under Joshua of a specific area – in OT called the promised land – perverted by Islam into an obligatory universal jihad to be fought by Muslims against unbelievers at all times and by all and any means.
This present World to Muslims is what the promised land was to the ancient Israelites, and military and political means are to Muslims legitimate offensive means to be used in order to spread Islam and legitimate means to be used in order to defend Islam. And furthermore: when this Islamic life of struggle is over the Muslim in his worldly deceived mind conspire to take the world with its lusts and pride with him to heaven and celebrate his arrival with wine an multiple orgasms provided for him by his prophet and at his eternal disposal. No wonder Islam is the fastest growing religion of the world.
Contrast that with “my Kingdom is not of this World”, “I am *the Way*”, “For our struggle is not against *flesh and blood*….”, “For the weapons of our warfare are not *of the flesh* but have divine power to destroy strongholds.” — in NT together with the peaceful proclamation of the gospel, often through the shedding of the blood of real martyrs and real Christians denying all fleshly desires, and the glaring differences between Islam and Christianity becomes obvious to everyone who want to see and who care to understand.
John Forbes says
SEEMS THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD HAS BEEN VERY ACTIVE WITH MUCH LYING & MISREPRESENTATION ALL OVER !
LISTENING TO SOROS – WHO STATED THAT THE US WOULD BE THE HARDEST NUT TO CRACK IT SEEMS HE MAY WELL BE WRONG !
THE SHARIA IS GETTING CLOSER & CLOSER I AM AFRAID !!
John Forbes says
THE BIBLE – OLD TESTAMENT HAS SOME NASTY PASSAGES BUT NOTHING TO COMPARE TO THE
SHARIA TRILOGY OF THE KORAN, HADITHS & AL – SUNA
NO ONE USES THE OLD TESTAMENT ANYWAY BUT ALL THE BOOKS OF ISLAM ARE USED , QUOTED & ACTED UPON !
KORAN,HADITHS & AL-SUNNA & ALL HAVE DIRECTIONS TO KILL , ENSLAVE & RAPE NON BELIEVERS OF THE FAITH !
Frank Riley says
I’d like to think that this comprehensive and truly scholarly reply from Robert Spencer might be published in the New Castle News, as it certainly ought to be. In the matter of educated Muslims being better in some way, may I add to Mr Spencer’s list that it was two Muslim doctors working in a Glasgow (Scotland) hospital who rammed their car into the airport building there intending to cause as much death and destruction as possible.
Michael Copeland says
The author is Hugh Fitzgerald.
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
One might regard Spencer as a historian of Islam, and Fitzgerald to be a historiographer of Islam. The distinction is important, and Fitzgerald’s role is important, because there is so much falsehood around Islam, as with this John Hamed character, whom Fitzgerald debunks.
Neither will ever run out of work to do.
gravenimage says
They are both fine and important scholars of Islam.
Robert Spencer says
Thanks for your kind words, but this article was not written by me, but by Hugh Fitzgerald. Contrary to rumor, we are not the same person.
Midnite Rider says
Daily,almost HOURLY we are inundated with reports of muslim VIOLENCE against those of different beliefs and cultures,and different sects of muslimism across the planet and we are supposed to believe it is NOT the whole but rather a small minority of them.
OK,I’ll bite,BUT only if you buy this really nice used bridge I own in Brooklyn NY,a really cool architectural structure I own in Paris,France and this great device I invented that warns you when you get too close to the edge of the planet and are about to fall off into space first.
I’m doing a rock bottom price of 10 billion USD for all three.
Do that and I’ll believe anything is possible afterwards.
You won’t need a receipt for proof,my word is sufficient.
Payment in CASH please.
Semper Fi
patriotliz says
Can’t find the link to the letter published Oct. 4 in the New Castle News, titled “America not the place for Muslims” to which John Hammond is replying to.
ISLAM certainly has no place in a free society if it means supplanting our laws w/ Sharia. Fake Muslims (i.e., heretics) who don’t really practice Islam as dictated by its founder, don’t read the Quran and other Islamic texts and don’t go to Islamic indoctrination centers/Mosques to listen to devout Imams who do teach the hateful ideology…I’m not all that concerned about them…but I wish they would just stop identifying themselves as Muslims. Otherwise, devout Muslims are a threat.
jewdog says
Once again Hugh is tasked with straightening out some numbskull’s idealized and twisted version of Islam. It’s a dirty, tedious job, but someone has to do it.
gravenimage says
I’m afraid not in this case, Jewdog–John Hamed Jr. is Muslim. This is Taqiyya, not ignorance.
Michael Copeland says
“The teachings of the Qur’an… are universal and trans-time.
They can be applied today as they were applied 1400 years ago,”
Ahmed Saad, North London Central Mosque
Andy says
“The teachings of the Qur’an you can lie to the “infidel”
What Is Taqiyya?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6F4wBeshTsw
Hoaxes of white on black/Islam violence grow, so do stories of black violence
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IsU-nQYi5M0&index=5&list=PLrWfhyZLmyQSDRdI5Mo7Eh5Tc9d-Cspqr
Taqiyya – Lying For Islam
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CvlvS2a2AVE
Linnte says
There are six different forms of deceite in Islam: Darura- deceit through necessity, Kitman- deceit by omission, Maruna- deceit by temporary suspension of Sharia, Taquiyya- deceit for the purpose of spreading Islam, Tawriya- deceit by ambiguity and lastly Taysir- deceit through fascilitation.
Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY) says
Mr. Hamed writes, “The writer obviously considered himself an expert on the text of Islam’s Holy Book, the Koran (sic). He quotes verses from Al-Qu’ran without any historical or contextual knowledge, and concludes that Muslims do not belong in America.”
He disparages the spelling “Koran” and instead refers to “Al-Qu’ran”. The kafir Mr. Fitzgerald refers to “the Qur’an”, using infidel apostrophe placement.
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
Me, I prefer the name Holy Ko-Ran. Using this name is the proper because it insults Islam, a vital necessity to the survival freedom on the planet. Ko-Ran (with -Ran pronounced as rain implies a hillbilly accent. Maybe that’s unfair, because your average hillbilly has far more intellectual honesty and morality than your average Moslem, an observer of the Holy Ko-Ran.
James Whitney says
“The Bible contains descriptions of violence limited in time and place, but does not prescribe open-ended violence by Christians.”
Absolutely correct! The Bible is descriptive not prescriptive. As discussed, the Bible is written in a historical content, while the Koran is a list of unconnected instructions and comments from Allah without any context. The violence described in the Bible (primarily in the Old Testament) is not a prescription to go out and kill non-believers.
By the way, Koran 9:30 says that all who believe that Jesus is the Son of God are accursed.
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
Well put. If only the Infidel populations of Western nations understood what you say.
eduardo odraude says
Besides, when you do look into the context of violent Qur’an verses, the context shows that Islamic jihad is for all time and the whole world.
Bernard Lewis says Islam imposes, without limit of time or space, the duty to subjugate non-Muslims
The well-known historian of Islam and the Middle East writes on p. 73 of The Political Language of Islam:
https://books.google.com/books?id=NXCTjv2oFtUC&pg=PA73
http://www.quotingislam.blogspot.com
gravenimage says
Hugh Fitzgerald: John Hamed, Jr. and the Misrepresentation of Islam
……………………
He’s a nasty piece of work.
saturnine says
It’s New Castle, Pennsylvania, northwest of Pittsburgh. Not Ohio.
martin says
John Hamed, just the standard depraved, corrupt and evil lying muslim,kept in islam by a mix of cowardice (allah proves in his own quran that he is not the creator, not god etc etc) together with the evil sinfull nature that islam teaches, nornalises and encourages… the ultimate excuse for the weakest and corrupt of natures.
In fact the only thing allah claims to be, that it proves itself to be is “the best of deceivers”, satan.