Islamophobia is killing the free world.
On this the Organization of Islamic Cooperation and the Council on American-Islamic Relations may agree, but I don’t mean the statement in quite the same sense in which they would understand it.
Scan over some recent Jihad Watch headlines:
Minnesota: Christian center fires man for helping stage “Exposing Sharia” event
Why did the Ironwood Springs Christian Ranch fire Gary Froiland? Because he helped organize an event called “Exposing Sharia.” Now, Sharia denies the freedom of speech and the freedom of conscience, mandates the death penalty for leaving Islam, devalues women’s testimony and inheritance rights, calls for the beating of women from whom men “fear disobedience,” institutionalizes discrimination against non-Muslims, and stipulates that non-Muslim lives are not worth as much as Muslim lives. For opposing that, Gary Froiland was fired by a Christian organization. Why? The Ironwood Springs Christian Ranch no doubt feared charges of “Islamophobia.”
AP: “In aftermath of bike path killings, mosques near NYC face hostility again”
Why does the establishment media constantly focus on Muslims as victims in the wake of jihad massacres? From mainstream coverage, one might get the idea that Muslims were run over in Manhattan by a “right-wing extremist,” rather than a Muslim screaming “Allahu akbar” running down Infidels. Why this inversion? Because the establishment media is committed to the false idea that Muslims are harassed and persecuted and discriminated against in the U.S., and so warrant special protection. The establishment media is more worried about “Islamophobia” than it is about jihad mass murder.
Toronto imam who prayed for killing of Jews again caught praying for deaths of non-Muslims
Instead of exposing and challenging Islamic antisemitism, the Toronto Star ran a lengthy defense of Toronto imam Ayman Elkasrawy. Now he has called for the killing of non-Muslims. Will the Star defend him again? It wouldn’t be any surprise if it did. Why? Because the Star, too, is more worried about “Islamophobia” than about Islamic violence and antisemitism.
UK: Labour leader launches “Islamophobia awareness month” with “extremist” Muslim group
Why is Jeremy Corbyn partnering with a group that promotes jihad and Jew-hatred? Because he, too, doesn’t think Islamic jihad massacres and antisemitism are as much of a threat as “Islamophobia.” Does he stop for a moment to ponder the fact that he is enabling more jihad massacres in the UK? Probably not.
Spain: Muslim screaming “Allahu akbar” breaks into school, says he’ll slaughter children “like lambs” and New York Daily News: Don’t “fear” when you hear “Allahu akbar” on an airplane or in a shopping mall
While Muslims worldwide scream “Allahu akbar” as they murder, or in this case, terrify non-Muslims, the establishment media works hard to assure us that “Allahu akbar” is a beautiful phrase and nothing to be concerned about? Why? Because they’re more concerned with stamping out “Islamophobia” than with stamping out jihad mass murder.
UK: Social worker accused of failing to protect Muslim rape gang victims is allowed to keep her job
Why did British officials turn a blind eye as Muslim rape gangs victimized tens of thousands of British girls? Why is it that even now those who are responsible are not being held accountable? Here again: fear of “Islamophobia” charges.
Germany: Muslim who plotted jihad massacre was given asylum without any vetting at all
Why has Angela Merkel inundated Germany with Muslim migrants, among whom are an unknowable number of jihad mass murderers? To show that Germany is not “Islamophobic.”
Those headlines are just from the last two days. Look through the Jihad Watch archives and you will find thousands, tens of thousands, of examples of how our freedoms are being infringed and our lives endangered, all because those who have sworn to protect us are afraid of appearing “Islamophobic.”
How has this happened? Find out in my new book Confessions of an Islamophobe. Preorder it here now. If free societies are going to survive, they’re going to have to confront and reject the concept of “Islamophobia.” Does that mean allowing innocent Muslims to be victimized? Of course not. Get the whole truth in Confessions of an Islamophobe, before “Islamophobia” destroys the free world altogether.
Voytek Gagalka says
They use that false narrative because it works. And they will continue to use as long it works (for them). It was quite similar with communists in the Eastern Block: To the nearly very end, they tried to “sell” a lie that communism is superior to capitalism and freedom, regardless that all evidence was clearly showing the opposite.
Dawn says
Exactly !
eduardo odraude says
Not enough to criticize and expose Islam for what it is. People need to join Brigitte Gabriel’s Act for America to influence legislation and policy directly.
Venril says
And they were forced to parrot what they knew to be lies and accept them, Over and over again. Part of breaking the spirit of a person, part of the plan.
Santa Voorhees says
“Islamophobia is white supremacy”.
So, opposing an intolerant belief system that thinks it must reign supreme above all, makes me a supremacist?
In what kind of dimension are they living?
LeftisruiningCanada says
The dimension where they know your motivations and innermost beliefs better than you do. What should expect from a generation schooled in post-modern deconstructionism, where you get to determine that an authors intentions are what you say they are, where you are a woman, or a man, or black, or whatever you want to be, just by saying so?
Santa Voorhees says
Indeed, they are living in a very demented dimension.
One of the “islamophobia-is-white-supremacy” weirdos stated:
“It’s not really about Islam – he wants to make it about Islam – what it’s about is white people trying to keep this community for white people and only white people. So it’s not really about Muslims, it’s about white people being racist and about white people trying to keep people out.”
Now, think about it…… What the hell does that even mean?!?
It’s not really about Islam and Muslims? How? Why? Any explanation?
White people trying to keep their community for white people only? Why? Any explanation?
White people trying to keep people out? How? Why? Any explanation?
Seriously, do these people ask themselves some questions first before making ridiculous (and also I’d say empty) statements?
Or does it require too much intelligence (I mean an IQ barely above 50, that is) that their brain cannot handle it otherwise it will override and explode?
gravenimage says
Yes–this claim is especially insane. There are White Muslims, and they are often as savage as those of other races–just look at the Tsarnaev brothers.
Of course, opposing Jihad has nothing to do with race.
Budvarakbar says
The International/COMMUNIST dimension – absolutely nothing more to it! – Don’t allow them to voluntarily confuse yourself!
LeftisruiningCanada says
Yes, were everything must be couched in the language of dialectical materialism – the oppressed and the oppressor. These kids focus on the race issue because it’s the only thing they know that allows them to fit the situation before them into those terms.
Too bad, because it’s blinding them to the philosophical nature of the current conflict.
By the way, can i take from your name that you live in a small walled town in the Fjord of Europe?
Bob says
They refuse to accept that the western Judeo-Christian culture IS vastly superior to their sand-pit mucklm culture!
john spielman says
just a bunch of ” useful idiots’ who embrace the crocodile in the room in the hopes that it will eat them last, but eat them, it will!
boakai ngombu says
these folks apparently haven’t been out of country. had they traveled, they would’ve seen that islamic supremacists (the one’s with the power) are white
Santa Voorhees says
The Left thinks that “white” is the opposite of “muslim”, which is complete nonsense because a skin colour cannot be the opposite of a belief system.
This should be a no-brainer even for a 6 year old child, but yet the Left isn’t able to get it…
Shmoovie says
“The Left thinks that “white” is the opposite of “muslim”…”
Perfect!!
tim gallagher says
I agree with Santa Voorhees and Shmoovie. Islamophobes fight against Islam because it is murderously violent and evil. Nothing to do with skin colour. But, of course, that imbecilic sign, “Islamophobia is white supremacy”, is probably just trying to use that vague, by now almost meaningless, term of abuse, “racist”, to try to besmirch opponents of evil Islam. Their demo is completely illogical and brainless. It’s the evil content of Islam that people like me hate and fight against. Or maybe these brainless (or evil demonstrators) believe that the sort of evil Muslims do,( terrorist murder, rape, etc,) is OK if it is non-white Muslims who are doing this evil. And white people can’t criticise evil done by non-white people because that is horrible racism. Maybe, to these demonstrators, non-white evil doers get a free pass. Islam condones the evil done by white and non-white Muslims. That is why Islamophobes hate Islam and fight against it. It’s about civilised behaviour versus barbaric Islam, nothing to do with race. .
Shmoovie says
The UN for one is full of non-white islamic supremacists.
These pale useful college meltaways who’ve decided to ‘protect’ People of Color (who they subconsciously view as inferior) from freedom of speech and mostly invented insults, have some powerful whites supporting their efforts. Agreed, many have likely not travelled further than the tourist traps near safe cruise-ship jettys.
But supremacy comes in all shades.
Ren says
Islamophobia is the way to go!
eduardo odraude says
Islamophobia is rejection of Muhammad, who was a white man, according to numerous core Islamic texts.
LeftisruiningCanada says
Perhaps his paleness was caused by that first encounter with ‘jibril?
Seemed to scare the heck out of him, and make him want to commit suicide.
Probably wasn’t one of the Holy Angels.
Guest says
“It’s okay to be white.”
Santa Voorhees says
No, it’s not you fucking Nazi! Reported to Police. You’ve been charged with accusations of racism and islamophobia. Police is on its way to you now.
Sarcasm? Yes, of course yes….. maybe ?
Guest says
I’m sick of people demonizing white people because of what happened in the past.
Not every slave was black and not every slave owner was white. My ancestors have bended backwards to make up for “white supremacy” but even when they they gave up everything to atone. They aren’t forgiven and their children are forced to atone for crimes they didn’t commit. What happened in the past was horrible, but it is just that. In the past. My ancestors did what they did to make up. Now groups like “black lives matter” have to do something in return. Forgive. Not forget, forgive.
gravenimage says
True, Guest. It was also largely White people–Westerners–who *ended* the slave trade.
If only that was true in Dar-al-Islam.
Carolyne says
My great-grandfather owned slaves. I know them by name from family documents. However, that has nothing to do with me. I never owned a slave and I have nothing to atone for on that score.
Carolyne says
The first known slave-owner in North America was a black man in Boston. I don’t have time to look up his name right now, but it is a documented fact.
Charles says
Islamophobia is “white supremacy”? Then how do they explain all the ex-Muslims? How do they explain Ayaan Hirsi Ali? Christine Williams? What is Islamophobia anyway?
gravenimage says
+1
Budvarakbar says
“What is Islamophobia anyway?”
Common sense!
Paul says
The wilfully deceived idiots above with the silly poster “Islamophobia is white
supremacy” – and whose comeuppance cannot come quickly enough – remind me
of one of Sye Ten Atheist’s cartoons. Very funny as usual, but the line between
satire and reality is virtually non-existent, it would appear :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcUi5_eNoqk
gravenimage says
Yes–his work is darkly hilarious. You can check out more of his work on line.
Paul says
Indeed, he’s brilliant 🙂
gravenimage says
Islamophobia is killing the free world
………………………
Right–never mind the rapes of children and slaughter of Infidels in mushrooming Jihad terror attacks–instead, it is *opposing* these horrors that is killing the free world.
Suicidal insanity…
DRHazard says
It is a given that anyone who calls somebody an Islamophobe either knows virtually nothing about Islam or is lying.
Budvarakbar says
Or the most obvious: ON THE OTHER SIDE!
JonnyJonny says
The similarity in the language and behaviour of those who claim the West is Islamophobic and those who blindly believe in anthropogenic climate change is no coincidence. They are both marxist in origin. Lying whilst not a Kremlin invention has been turned into an art form by them. On both sides of the Atlantic higher education has been infected to such an extent with extreme left ideologs that they no longer stand out. Weird left has become the new “normal”. Our young are bing mentally abused by teachers who are the product of those nutjobs in university social sciences departments and who pass on their infection and skewed set of values to our children teaching them to question and in extremist hate what is the pinnacle of human achievement, the Western Democracies. They teach our children what to think not how to think, how to conform and the dangers inherent in questioning the unquestionable ideology which must be defended at all costs
Venril says
All cudgels used by the left to justify seizing more power.
sakovkt says
This is all true.
But I think you need to go back the last world war and the “Holocaust” to understand where “anti-Racism” actually started in America.
This was the original “Identity Politics” from the Feudal Absolutist Class System which Metternich restored.
Our Revolution, on the other hand, succeeded, because we were “a people”, as our Founders told the British (as in “American” and “not British’)
After Waterloo, however, Liberal Europe split into factions that would become Nationalists and Marxists, both considered subversive by the Restored Absolutists (the Carbonari, Free Masons, lots of them).
The European Dynasties discredited themselves during WW1.
The European Empires disintegrated during the Cold War.
But the Feudal Class system persists today in Europe and now, it’s in America.
It’s not peasants, Jews, aristocrats, bourgeoisie, guilds, ect.
It’s Blacks, Latinos, Jews, Homosexuals, Feminists and whatever.
But it’s a Feudal Class System, manipulated by political “monarchs” iaw each classes function within the state, not to include immigrants.
We’re back to Absolutism, in other words, but a “modernized” version of it, the Idea of the “Radical Right” during interwar Europe.
Oh, what goes around, comes around.
gravenimage says
sakovkt wrote:
This is all true.
But I think you need to go back the last world war and the “Holocaust” to understand where “anti-Racism” actually started in America.
……………………….
Racism–where it actually exists–is genuinely disgusting. And your using sneer quotes for the Holocaust is concerning. Are you denying it occurred or that it was an atrocity? Or did you mean something else?
Of course, opposing the horrors of Islam has nothing to do with racism.
Islam is not a race–it is an ideology, and a damned ugly one.
More:
This was the original “Identity Politics” from the Feudal Absolutist Class System which Metternich restored.
Our Revolution, on the other hand, succeeded, because we were “a people”, as our Founders told the British (as in “American” and “not British’)
……………………….
Actually, the Founding Fathers very much considered themselves English. Our grievances, in fact, were that we were not accorded the rights of Englishmen by the crown. It was only after the Revolution that we began to identify primarily as Americans.
Not sure I buy the idea that group identity politics is “Feudal”–in fact, in most ways it is the opposite of Feudalism, which is a strict, top-down class society under a monarch and nobility which does not allow for much social mobility. This seems the opposite of what we have today.
I might describe identity politics as “Tribal”, though.
Lydia says
Islam is tyranny and bigot supremacy.
Islamophobia is common sense.
They need to seriously grow a brain.
pfwag says
An idealogy worse than Nazism operating under the protections of the First Amendment is slowly killing America.
Rey Ybarra says
There is no excuse to not know the strategies of the islamofacists after 16 years since 9/11. Willfull ignorance gives way to politicians, organizations and individuals being used as useful idiots, stooges and apologists to spread the false doctrine of islamophobia. The term islamophobic was created by the front group The International Institute of Islamic Thought to make it a thought crime to anyone who opposes and calls out the atrocities committed by followers of the koran.
Politicianphobia says
I am an Islamophobe and I encourage all Canadians to send a letter to Justin Trudeau saying we do not want M-103 in Canada. You can send it to justin.trudeau@parl.gc.ca
Alexander Gofen says
It’s LIBERASTIA (whose part is islamophobia) which kills the free world. It’s a large package of treasonous suicidal ideas which turned the reality upside down and is pushed into throats of the sheeple…
1) Not only phobia of islam is legitimate and necessary, but also hatred of islam is legitimate and necessary no less than hatred of nazism or communism! Islam does not belong to any of the nations of the free world. The free world must rid of islam.
2) It’s a must to maintain an originally white nation as white. A white nationalism (and any nationalism) is a component of a legitimate patriotism and a duty to preserve the national identity of the own nation! It’s not about comparison (who is superior) but about preservation of your own kind!
3) And for idiots which dig deeper and want comparisons, it’s an objective reality who is actually superior!..
JayT says
As you run around America with the “Islamophobia is white supremacy” sign prominently displayed, two questions come to my mind.
First, what will you do (get a new sign?) if you find yourself among non-white Americans that are against Islam?
Second, if you plan on playing the slavery/race card as an attack/defense tactic, were you given a list of names and accompanying photos, so you know who’s ancestors owned slaves and who’s ancestors fought on the Union’s side against the Confederacy?
I would think it’s more than a bit embarrassing to call out someone as a white racist based on the sole fact they are white and an assumption their ancestor was on the side of the Confederacy if they had ancestors who fought on the Union side, no?
LR says
@JatT: “I would think it’s more than a bit embarrassing to call out someone as a white racist based on the sole fact they are white and an assumption their ancestor was on the side of the Confederacy if they had ancestors who fought on the Union side, no?”
I guess it doesn’t matter anymore that many ‘white people’ fought and died to end slavery. Now, according to some people, all ‘white’ people are bad. They aren’t perfect enough. I guess they won’t be ‘perfect’ enough until they let oppressive commie, or Sharia types ‘take them over’.
When a Christian church where Washington bought a family pew, is ridiculous enough to rid the plaque dedicated to him, because it ‘hurts’ some peoples feelings, because they want to be inclusive to all…What the heck are we suppose to expect?
LR says
So, what do they say to a black person who is Islamophobic?