In his book While Europe Slept, Bruce Bawer reports that Muslim leaders in Norway tell their people that “Islamic law gives them the right to abuse the infidels’ system as much as possible — the right, in Kheir Sajer’s words, to ‘cheat and lie to the countries that harbor them.’ They are told to view the benefits they receive as jizya — the tributes that the infidel natives of Muslim-occupied countries are obliged to pay to Muslims in order to preserve their lives.”
It is the Infidels’ duty to pay for the upkeep of the Muslims: “Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued” (Qur’an 9:29).
“Only 4 out of 2,429 refugees are fully employed in Dutch city of Rotterdam,” Voice of Europe, November 24, 2017:
Since 2015 the Dutch city of Rotterdam has had 2,429 refugees allocated to it. Today it can be revealed that 95 per cent of them are living on benefits and only 4 are in full-time employment.
Rotterdam’s right-wing political party Leefbaar Rotterdam says:
“Refugees would be an enrichment of the city, but now we see they receive a ticket for benefits. Rotterdam already has enough troubles.”…
Barry says
4/2429 = ~ .165%…So basically, statistically weak fare recepients don’t work…
Westman says
Even running the numbers for the 75% men and leaving the domestic servants(muslimas) and children out, it’s only .0022(rounded), or .22% working. Negligible.
Something is rotting in Rotterdam. The usual leadership excuses are getting old as most of the “refugees” have been there for almost 2 years.
Ian H says
My assumption when I read that is that 120 have some sort of part time work.
Westman says
Yes, we’ve seen this kind of job; like workers hanging around building supply stores in California.
le gravenimage says
Most immigrants from Mexico and Central America are *much* more hard working than are Muslims.
And many of them move up from this kind of work pretty fast.
One of my brothers is a construction contractor, and while he has issues with illegal immigration, regularly used such labor when he was operating in California (it was unfortunately pretty much a financial necessity if you were going to be able to bid competitively).
There were several laborers who not only proved to be hard workers, but quickly picked up at least the rudiments of English and also were eager to learn more skilled work–several even on their own time.
He wound up hiring at least half of these workers on a regular basis.
gravenimage says
The post above is mine.
Bev says
I pay my Jizzya with a 357magnum.
Gaz says
You can bet that the four that are working are employed by the government to assist refugees claim all the benefits they are entitled to.
Ian H says
They are probably Imams.
gravenimage says
Probably true, Gaz.
mortimer says
GI, yikes!
Cheer Bear Girl says
All the more reason to deport the vast majority of so called refugees.
vyx says
If you suggest something like that in Europe, I’m pretty sure you’re at risk of being jailed for Hate Speech.
Always being the “victim” has really worked out well for muslims.
They claim they are the victim of something in their nation of origin, even though they still visit there on the regular basis. Because they are a victim, they must be given sanctuary.
However, they don’t want to learn the language, so in many cases, they are not employable. If you suggest they learn the language, they scream islamophobia. And if, God forbid, you suggest they go back to the country they frequently visit, well, you’re a hater; you can’t say that, since they are a VICTIM in that country. They are “in danger.”
Specifically, they are in danger of having to suppor themselves.
Voytek Gagalka says
“Work”? Why they should work if infidels pay them their Jizyah “with willing submission”? Does any Mohammedan ever work? They have slaves for that! Who build all infrastructures in Saudi Arabia or Gulf States? Foreigner contractors or slaves. They only works Mohammedans are required to fulfill not helped by anyone is a “work” during their sexual activity.
gravenimage says
+1
Westman says
Getting kafir jizya,
And all the things it will buy,
It’s nice work if you can get it,
And you can get it if you try.
Strollin’ with my four wives,
Creating plenty of fry,
Nice work if you can get it,
And you can get it if you try.
Just imagine my Imam,
Waiting at the big Mosque door,
Where we plot our future,
Who could ask for anything more?
Sent zakat to ISIS,
After takin’ that vow,
Nice work if you can get it,
You can’t get it? Let me tell you how!
(Sung to: Nice Work If You Can Get It.)
gravenimage says
Brilliant.
Geoffrey Britain says
Suicidal denial on a level never before witnessed…
Bu what’s unforgivable is they’re condemning their children to a future hell.
St. Manuel II Palaiologos says
A statistical irrelevance. What a terrible policy.
Benedict says
How humiliating it must be for Muslims, heirs to the perfect religion, to receive “sadaqah” from infidels. It is bound to contribute to the rage and resentment Muslims develop towards the country that shows them generosity and hospitality.
Wellington says
And still, Benedict, you would persist in not looking upon Muslims as lesser human beings? OK, let’s compromise, how about “confused human beings?”
And would you even desist in assigning inferior status to someone like Adolf Hitler or the SS? I trust you see my point.
Interesting and telling how Christianity is the mirror image of Islam in sundry ways. Both err, I would contend, but in very different ways—-one being too lenient, the other not being lenient enough. Understand, I far prefer Christianity to Islam and wish every Muslim would wake up tomorrow a devout Christian—–the world would be infinitely better off were this “miracle” to occur. But still it does not validate Christianity, but only negates Islam (which would be more than enough for this agnostic, one me).
Benedict says
W: If you assign inferior status to some human beings you also grant them lesser responsibility. The law grants inferior status to children and mentally impaired. Hitler was neither. –
I would rather call Muslims unfortunate people having been burdened by the yoke of Islam. If you had been born in a Muslim country or you parents were Muslims living in the West, chances are high you also would be in their situation.
Anyhow, I don’t think space here and the idea of JW comment section is suitable for detailed or too private discussions. –
PS: I would consider assigning inferior status to a certain proportion of SS = Stanford Students until they start to behave like adults.
Wellington says
In no way does inferior status equate to lesser responsibility in a very large percentage of cases. For instance, do you really want to argue that KKK members have less responsibility? C’mon.
As for the “yoke stuff,” I’ll give you that to a certain extent (e.g., born a child of KKK members) but life requires often times that you rise above your circumstances and attempt to be the best possible person you can be. Be careful that you don’t end up often times thinking you have provided an argument when, in fact, all that is going on is that you have proffered an excuse masquerading as an argument.
gravenimage says
Benedict, I don’t think if you consider devout Muslims to be inferior to civilized people that this means expecting less of them and so excusing their actions. Islam is an ideology, and as such is *chosen*.
I consider Fascists and Klan members to be inferior, as well–and that does not mean I am giving them a moral out. Anything but.
mortimer says
Please allow me to interject in this discussion of ‘INFERIOR’ versus ‘SUPERIOR’ cultures.
We are discussing the POLITICAL IDEOLOGY of Islam. That IDEOLOGY CANNOT be reformed or modernized.
THAT is the concern.
Islam’s ideology is a BRONZE AGE ideology that CANNOT be modernized. THAT is the problem.
LeftisruiningCanada says
Likely it does.
You know those laws about not allowing a dhimmi to have his house higher than a muslims?
What do you think of applying that on a world scale as another reason for islamic grievance against the west?
When they look from their countries, most of which are *not great*, and see the USA, Europe, Australia etc, how high our infidel homes must look to them. And how rude it must seem to them that we do that, while the best of peoples live as they do…
gravenimage says
Yes–if the “best of peoples”–Muslims–are not living high on the hog (pun intended) then it must be the fault of the “filthy Infidels”.
Muslim troll Ibrahim itace muhammed actually recently claimed here that Western technological innovation somehow prevents Muslims from being able to invent things. He did not say how this works, of course.
mortimer says
GI, how did the ancient world’s libraries and academies prevent the illiterate desert Muslims from inventing? The Muslims BURNT the libraries and persecuted the academies out of existence and murdered their teachers.
How did wiping out the learning of the Roman era prevent Muslims from inventing?
gravenimage says
All good questions, Mortimer.
Wellington says
As many as four?
gravenimage says
Ha ha
Robeaver. says
Seems really high to me, as well. Mistaken identity, perhaps? And negative integers will be neede if they bring relatives.
mummymovie says
Those are some impressive numbers!
le gravenimage says
Netherlands: Only 4 out of 2,429 refugees are fully employed in Rotterdam
………………………..
This obviously goes *way* beyond a problem with skills or speaking the language. Almost any able-bodied person can get a low level job hauling items at a construction site or for a landscaper, or washing dishes at a restaurant. An unemployment rate of *95%* is intentional.
gravenimage says
The above comment is mine.
LeftisruiningCanada says
ah oui oui le GI, mai what about not wanting to declare your menial construction job so that the jizya, i mean welfare check keeps coming?
tgusa says
Brought on all of us by the parasitic left that is and always will be the parasitic left.
Robeaver. says
Blame yourself. Look in mirror. lol for all your emails to your congressperson, and rep, and mayor, and president, and immigration departments.. but NO, you whine about the left. That will fix the problem. Whine louder, and lie on floor kicking your feet. This is another rational problem solving method. Thanks for your valuable input. Clever and in site full……….of you know what.
gravenimage says
?
tgusa says
Emails / contacts to my leftist reps (lol, I have no representation, just taxation) can you point out the whine in my comment? Sorry, my mother always told me to never associate with imbeciles, so don’t bother responding imbecile.
John Forbes says
THE CANCELLATION OF A FILM EXPOSING ISLAM IN CANADA SHOULD COME AS NO SURPRISE AT ALL!
MUSLIM JUSTIN HAS CONVERTED I FIRMLY BELIEVE & TOGETHER WITH HIS MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD ARE WORKING FURIOUSLY TO HAVE CANADA SHARIA COMPLIANT.
ONCE THIS HAPPENS A JOINT FAITH ANNOUNCEMENT WILL BE MADE WITH M-103 TURNING INTI A BLASPHEMY LAW OR LAWS ONCE HEDY FRY – HAS TOLD ENOUGH LIES!
AFTER THAT SHARIA WILL BE INTRODUCED AS THE CBC HAS ALREADY STATED THAT THERE IS NOTHING TO BE WORRIED ABOUT SHARIA!
AFTER ALL MUSLIM JUSTINS BROTHER MUSIM SASHA – DOES MOVIES FIR THE DELIGHTFUL CROWD IN IRAN!
LIKE IRAN THERE SHOULD BE NO ISSUES – CRANES WITH HANGING PEOPLE CAN BE HIDDEN & PEOPLE STONED TO DEATH FOR FORNICATION & ADULTERY OR HONOUR KILLINGS CAN ALSO BE HIDDEN EXCEPT FOR THE STONERS WHO CAN BE TRAINED NOT TO PUT THIS ON THEIR PHONES LIKE IN IRAN & PAKISTAN!
Robeaver. says
Name the film.
Westman says
I’m guessing it is, “Killing Europe”, and is, currently, free viewing for Prime members on Amazon Video.
gravenimage says
I think you are right, Westman:
“Ottawa library cancels planned screening of controversial ‘Killing Europe’ doc”
http://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-news/ottawa-library-cancels-planned-screening-of-controversial-hate-speech-film
Notice that one of those who go the film showing canceled was not alarmed by the violence of Muslims and the Islamafication of Europe, but that anyone would dare mention it.
Gbox says
No surprise – they are not there to work or be productive citizens.
henner720 says
chapter 3 vers 28 ; cheat and lie all you want. they are all pigs. who do not believe in our gangsta totalitarian secteric imperialism.
Anne says
Bruce Bawer’s 2006 book on the Muslim no-go zones in and around major European Cities is an excellent read. Police dare not enter some Muslim neighborhoods and they can become killing zones for gay tourists who unwittingly venture in!
MFritz says
At least in the NL the numbers came out! In Germany’s media you won’t hear ANYTHING about this.
gravenimage says
And don’t forget that Rotterdam has a Muslim Mayor, Ahmed Aboutaleb. In case you wonder why Rotterdammers would have elected a Muslim Mayor, they didn’t. The Dutch do not have the choice of electing Mayors; they are appointed.
Before he was Mayor, he was–don’t laugh–State Secretary for Social Affairs and Employment.
abad says
Um, first of all, these Moslems in the Netherlands are NOT refugees. They are invaders.
Second – Islam has no place at all in Dutch society.
Third – round up all the Moslems on their soil and send them all back to Syria.