This may offer some insight into why the UK government is inviting in so many Muslims, and doing everything it can to appease and accommodate them, even to the extent of letting Muslim rape gangs run wild for years, with British authorities too afraid of being called “racist” and “Islamophobic” to do anything about: key members of the British political elite, including Prince Charles, don’t find the Islamic supremacist world view, particularly in its hatred of and paranoia toward Jews, all that different from its own.
“Prince Charles blames ‘foreign Jews’ for Middle East turmoil in 1986 letter,” by Chantal Da Silva, Independent, November 12, 2017 (thanks to MH):
Prince Charles has come under fire after it came to light that he blamed the “influx of foreign Jews” for causing unrest in the Middle East and called on the US to “take on the Jewish lobby” in a letter penned in 1986.
Writing to his friend Laurens van der Post, the Prince argued that the exodus of European Jews in the middle of the last century “helped to cause the great problems” in the Middle East.
“I now appreciate that Arabs and Jews were all a Semitic people originally + it is the influx of foreign, European Jews (especially from Poland, they say) which has helped to cause the great problems,” the Prince wrote in a letter published by the Daily Mail.
“I know there are so many complex issues, but how can there ever be an end to terrorism unless the causes are eliminated?” he added.
“Surely some US president has to have the courage to stand up and take on the Jewish lobby in the US? I must be naive, I suppose!”
The letter was found in a public archive and was written on 24 November, 1986, following an official visit the then-38-year-old Prince made to Saudia Arabia, Bahrain and Qatar with the late Princess Diana.
The Prince of Wales wrote that the tour was “fascinating” and that he had learned “a lot about the Middle East and Arab outlook”.
“Tried to read bit of Koran on way out and it gave me some insight in to the way they [Arabs] think and operate,” he wrote in the letter.
“Don’t think they could understand us through reading Bible though!”…
clap says
“I know there are so many complex issues, but how can there ever be an end to terrorism unless the causes are eliminated?”
Now Chuck just needs to realize what causes terrorism.
RICHARD CANARY says
What in the the world does this flacid stooge “Chuck” have to claim about any understanding of Islam, no less any understanding of how to deal with it? England is selling out to Islam at every chance they get.
Carolyne says
He understands that Islam permits polygamy and I think he likes that a lot. I am in the process of reading a book where the American Ambassador at the time of the Gulf War was asked by Charles to stop fighting during Ramadan. When the Ambassador told him that was not possible, Charles said “But….but….the Americans can do anything.”
Prince Charles lives in a world where he is wrapped in cotton wool and even has a man who places his toothbrush on his toothbrush for him. To make it worse, he is an idiot.
Carolyne says
“Toothpaste on his toothbrush.”
apexpoint says
Perhaps an inbred moron.
epistemology says
He’s so stupid and anti-Semitic, it’s disgusting. Israel is Jewish land, it’s the country of our forefathers and Muslims are intruders, period.
Stan Lee says
Charlie the Prince probably feels highly qualified concerning Islam and Arabs. He is known to dress up in imitation of the renowned British actor, Peter O’Toole playing T.E. Lawrence in the film “Lawrence of Arabia.” I recall seeing a news photo of Charles wearing similar Arab garb to the filmy white outfit that O’Toole wore as leader of an Arab tribal raid on retreating Turkish troops, upon whom Lawrence’s Arab irregulars sought vengeance against. This was revealed years ago, but the exact time I have forgotten. The photo of Charles I haven’t forgotten. Obviously, he had fallen for Lawrence’s love of the Arabian desert and its people. The British news report stated that Charles was “often dressed in such garb,” and that “he wore same for its comfort”.
Gordon Miller says
Prince Charles, who, incidentally looks like he has yet to take off his Halloween costume, should mind his own business. He has the nerve to give advice to others while his own country is a place one should avoid. It is that bad.
Save Europe says
Prince Charles is an utter pratt, and a complete embarrassment to Right leaning folks, here in the UK.
John Forbes says
PRINCE CHARLES IS AN EMBARRASSMENT PERIOD & NEEDS TO BE SENT TO THE HEBRIDES IF THEY CAN TOLERATE HIM TO TALK TO HIGHLAND CATTLE & CONVERSE WITH SEALS OR CARROTS LIKE GEORGE THE THIRD.
HOWEVER ON A LIGHTER NOTE – CHARLES IS JUST WAITING FOR HIS MUM TO PASS ON SO THAT HE CAN GET THE INTERFAITH TITLE IN THE FINSBURY MOSQUE !
HE, CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF LONDON , BANKS, INSURANCE BROKERS , SO CALLED ELITE ( COWARDS ACTUALLY) HAVE ALL SOLD OUT TO SHARIA FINANCE !
ISLAMIC STATE WITH SHARIA FOR ALL NEXT CENTURY – 50 TO 1 BET
Larry says
Great costume, I didn’t know they celebrated Halloween over there. What a stooge.
JOHN says
Senility setting in? does he realize a fatwa has been placed on Prince George? Here is hoping Charles never becomes King.
gravenimage says
Good question, JOHN. Does Prince Charles even care that pious Muslims want to murder his sweet little grandson?
“Prince George an Islamic State target”
http://thenewdaily.com.au/entertainment/celebrity/2017/10/30/prince-george-islamic-state-target/
I agree–this vicious dhimmi tool should *never* be king.
J D S says
Wonder what really “happened” to Princess Diana?????
butros says
charlie identifies with the ideal of absolute monarchism of the arab monarchies and Islam. He yearns for the great days of yore which only an islamic caliphate can bring back…an anachronism kept in place like old junk on a dusty shelf.
Hari Singh says
Prince Charles is a follower of Mehmet Nazım Adil (April 21, 1922 CE – May 7, 2014; Sha’ban 23, 1340 AH– Rajab 8, 1435 AH), commonly known as Shaykh Nazim (Turkish: Şeyh Nazım), was a Turkish Cypriot Sufi Muslim sheykh and spiritual leader of the Naqshbandi tariqa. He is also known as the Sultan-ul-awl of this age.
Shaykh Nazim also repudiated terrorism as a key feature of his teachings.[6] He said:
Those who plant bombs and kill the innocent are not Muslims. A Muslim defends the faith by fighting face to face, not by cowardly means.
To this end, Shaykh Nazim had expressed ardent support for George W Bush and Tony Blair’s “War on Terror”, to the extent of declaring them as achieving sainthood due to their efforts in “fighting tyrants and evil and devils”.[6] Shaykh Nazim also most notably predicted that the regimes in the Middle East would be replaced by one ruling sultanate before the end of 2011. Shaykh Nazim also claimed that Prince Charles had “really embraced Sufism and Islam in his heart” and would forcibly dissolve the Parliament of the United Kingdom
gravenimage says
Sufism does *not* reject violent Jihad.
Gary says
Countries must stop muslims taking over a country in Europe when you hsc liberal people who love them but are afraid of them London is lost and other nations Obamo called workplace violance terroist call it violance at work not terroist ha e they lost their way
Richard Paulsen says
The new Lawrence of Arabia? He also said something like – ” let us face it, Jews and Christians were here (in tme Mid East) before”.. As I remember from TV once. To the astonishement of many.
Muslims claiming leadership where ever they are. Never respecting and acccepting others.
Europe is in a dangerous situation. We must concentrate on that. Before it finally will fall in the hands of muslims invaders too.
Imagine NATO in the hands of the Muslim brotherhood. Nothing to look forward to.
Save Europe says
I genuinely respect your concern as a Limey. I’m very concerned as well – and I say the following NOT to incite – but I can see a conflagration across Europe and not NATO being taken over by Islam.
Guest says
Why does everyone pick on the Jews?
Richard Paulsen says
Wonder the same. Can not find a logic reason. Or no reason at all. Feeling insulted, anyone trying to make me believe.
Rob Crawford says
Because they feel inferior.
And, let’s face it, if there’s anyone who has cause to feel inferior it’s Prince Charles.
eduardo odraude says
The Jews and other highly successful minorities tend to be hated. If I’m not mistaken, Thomas Sowell pointed out this pattern in part by comparing the Jews to the highly successful Chinese minority in Malaysia.
gravenimage says
True, Eduardo–these two groups also have in common that they are viciously persecuted by Muslims.
RICHARD CANARY says
The worst of Jewish people are immeasurably better in all respects of human quality than the best of Muslims.
gravenimage says
+1
Frank Anderson says
Because they are convenient targets; because they are as a group well-educated and generally successful; because they (at least some of them) think; because there are so few of them compared to those who have been taught for 2,000 years to hate them; because some Jews are really hard to get along with. After all, Jews have as a society outlived approximately 19 societies/civilizations in 3700 years in spite of best efforts to eliminate them. See, Jews, God and History for a better account. They were not chosen for special privileges but to carry special burdens. “Some do; some don’t; but some do.”
RICHARD CANARY says
Well said. And it made me think of other qualities, such as they don’t butcher their young daughters with vaginal mutilation, nor murder their kids for disobedience, and they don’t slaughter people who not share their views about anything.
In a nut shell, I tend to think of Muslims like the Muslims think of Jews. But I have good reasons.
Frank Anderson says
The qualities of Judaism far outweigh any negatives. It is those qualities that seem to motivate the attacks because they make the attackers look so un-quality in comparison. One of the teachings of Judaism that is so fundamentally candid is that there are no perfect people, anywhere; which challenges all others who wish to teach that human perfection is possible. ALL people portrayed in the Tanakh/Old Testament have some flaw to go along with their qualities. Such intellectual honesty is exciting to me and inspires many to strive to do better while realizing that perfection is not necessary to be good.
Gary says
God is in Jersulem Jews are Gods people Muslims hate al Hews want Israel hate Christians and all Americians and Europeans muslims hates anyone e who is not Muslim I know muslims believers who say Muslims worship him below
le mouron rouge says
Guest says
November 12, 2017 at 1:06 pm
Why does everyone pick on the Jews?
*******************************
14. The LORD God said to the serpent, “Because you have done this, cursed are you above all livestock and above all beasts of the field; on your belly you shall go,
and dust you shall eat all the days of your life. 15. I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and her offspring; he shall bruise your head, and you shall bruise his heel.”
Genesis 3:14-15
1.Now the LORD said to Abram, “Go from your country and your kindred and your father’s house to the land that I will show you. 2. And I will make of you a great nation, and I will bless you and make your name great, so that you will be a blessing. 3. I will bless those who bless you, and him who dishonors you I will curse, and in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed.”
Genesis 12:1-3
And so, the battle rages on, Satan’s attempt to prove that God is a liar by destroying what God has promised to keep as His forever.
Champ says
Precisely, Guest! Great question and answer.
And “Got Questions” offers some more insights from a Biblical point of view:
Question: “What is the cause of all the anti-Semitism in the world?”
Answer: https://www.gotquestions.org/anti-Semitism.html
Take care!
Peter Clemerson says
Every one of these reasons given in your cited web page is incorrect. Please read some social and evolutionary psychology.
The psychology behind the derogation of the ‘other’ is a universal human attribute and manifests itself in all forms of discrimination. You could start with
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discrimination
and
http://www.age-of-the-sage.org/psychology/social/social_identity_theory.html
Champ says
Peter Clemenson, the above information from “Got Questions” is in fact correct, from a Biblical point of view. You are offering information from a different source which is offering another perspective.
Peter Clemerson says
Reply to Champ.
I completely agree that I am offering information from another perspective, a scientific one rather than one based upon mythology.
Champ says
Question: “How do I know the Bible is not just mythology?”
Answer: https://www.gotquestions.org/Bible-mythology.html
Champ says
Forgive me …
I meant to thank “le mouron rouge” for the spot on answer provided, as well!
le mouron rouge says
Champ,
Thank you for the comment and the link.
And this::
12. How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations! 13. For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: 14. will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High. 15. Yet thou shalt be brought down to hell, to the sides of the pit.
Isaiah 14:12-16
le mouron rouge says
Oppps, typo:
Isaiah 14:12-15
Champ says
Another great verse from the Bible, le mouron rouge–thank you for pointing this out!
J D S says
Yes of course Satan is at the root of all our problems. Satan is in charge of the world…”for a time” but as his time runs out…things will get much worse as seen by what is happening in the world today.
Eti says
Interesting question. Jews lived harmoniously thousand years in Boudist Hinduist countries no persecution. Two hundred years after Jesus, the Roman Greeck powers understood the power of Christianity and subverted it to State power. Then they aimed to eliminate Jews and Judaism to become supremacists. When Islam was created its leaders acted the same way as the Roman Greeck powers to become Supremascists. Simple but too much propaganda all over the world that complicates any understanding.
Suebe Hatz says
Because Satan hates the chosen people of God. Satan is the god of this world, and he hates Jews and Christians, that is why Jews have always been the target of most everyone. Christians are now facing a lot of hatred now because Satan’s time is coming and he doesn’t have much of it to destroy as many souls as he could possibly do.
martin says
Up untill a few yeara ago the church of rome taught that the jews killed hitler and that roman catholics replaced the jews as Gods chosen people.
Centuries of jew hate by rome…… is a major part of the problem.
Maybe you were not aware of it but the roman catholic crusades were not just killing muslims in jerusalem, they also exterminated most of the jewish christians in northern israel.
The corrupt, unsaved sinfull nature hates the idea of their being a God who will judge them so tends to associate anything linked to God, ie jews, christians.
The more corrupt their nature, the more hate.
Robert Spencer says
“Up untill a few yeara ago the church of rome taught that the jews killed hitler ”
Are you insane?
gravenimage says
martin wrote:
Up untill (sic) a few yeara (sic) ago the church of rome (sic) taught that the jews (sic) killed hitler (sic)
……………………………
What is martin babbling about? The Catholic Church never taught any such thing.
Champ says
The above comment from “martin” offers more proof of satan’s influence on a willing soul who’s eager to relish in his lies; and then earnestly, yet carelessly, share this rubbish with others. Go figure.
And martin also addresses the topic of “replacement theology”, which is evil the core, and just another one of satan’s unadulterated lies. Do some much needed research and stat.
Carolyne says
It all started with the myth of a God and his son. The Jews supposedly killed him and Christians will forever blame them for killing a man some thought to be the actual son of their god..
gravenimage says
Carolyne, very few Christians hold the Jews responsible for the killing of Christ today. It was the Roman Empire that executed him.
Champ says
Question: “Who was responsible for Christ’s death? Who killed Jesus?”
Answer: The answer to this question has many facets. First, there is no doubt the religious leaders of Israel were responsible for Jesus’ death. Matthew 26:3-4 tells us that “the chief priests, and the scribes, and the elders of the people, assembled together to the palace of the high priest, who was called Caiaphas. And they consulted so that they might take Jesus by guile and kill Him.” The Jewish leaders demanded of the Romans that Jesus be put to death (Matthew 27:22-25). They couldn’t continue to allow Him to work signs and wonders because it threatened their position and place in the religious society they dominated (John 11:47-50), so “they plotted to put Him to death” (John 11:53).
The Romans were the ones who actually crucified Him (Matthew 27:27-37). Crucifixion was a Roman method of execution, authorized and carried out by the Romans under the authority of Pontius Pilate, the Roman governor who sentenced Jesus. Roman soldiers drove the nails into His hands and feet, Roman troops erected the cross and a Roman solider pierced His side (Matthew 27:27-35).
More here: https://www.gotquestions.org/responsible-Christ-death.html
Kepha says
How odd
Of God
To choose
The Jews.
How odder still
Are those who choose
The Jewish God
And hate the Jews.
Not-so-Bonnie Prince Charlie (then again, as a God-bless-King-Billy Protestant, I think that Charles Edward Stewart was a besotten pretender and it’s just as well for all of us that he had to skedaddle back to France) claims to want to be “Defender of Faiths”, meaning, I suppose, of those that claim to be Abrahamic, while taking the position (after Mum’s demise) of Head of the Church of England. I guess the above rhyme fits him.
le mouron rouge says
It’s possible that Charlie’s thought process has been affected by too much inbreeding.
In today’s society that would qualify him as a victim and exonerate him from any guilt associated with his comments.
This reminds of a neighbor, who in total frustration, dragged her son home, while he kept pleading, “It’s not my fault, my brain made me do it!”
dumbledoresarmy says
I don’t think that the Queen and Prince Philip were particularly closely related.
Carolyne says
Second cousins, once removed. Both descended from Queen Victoria. Prince Philip is related through the Danish royal family also as Queen Alexandra’s was the present Queen’s Great-Grandmother. Prince Philip is actually Danish, not Greek nor English.
Carolyne says
Queen Alexandra, not Queen Alexandra’s.
RichardL says
Imagine being his mom and having to hand over the family business to someone who lost his marbles when he still was a kid…
Rob Crawford says
I suspect the throne will skip a generation. The queen will either abdicate (on her death bed) in favor of a grandson, or she’s holding onto life until Charles has passed away.
RichardL says
He will not be king if she has anything to do with it, agreed.
Carolyne says
The throne has never skipped a generation with the exception of Edward VIII who abdicated, He was king for several months but uncrowned.
Janice Disher says
RichardL – very true
nicu says
Did he forget that the British Empire is responsible for the trouble , too ? Iraq was established by the Britons . They have cheated the Arabs for getting their help against the Osmanian Empire .
gravenimage says
Nicu, the idea that it is the British Empire that is responsible for violent Jihad is mistaken. Islamic Jihad predates the British Empire by over a thousand years.
Benedict says
“Tried to read bit of Koran on way out and it gave me some insight in to the way they [Arabs] think and operate,” he wrote in the letter.” –
You can say that again.
utis says
Well, the letter is over 30 years old. People can change a lot through experience and expanding core knowledge. If he left his brain in that Lawrence of Arabia costume (isn’t that racist by today’s standards?), England’s screwed. On the other hand, I thought the English monarchy today is mostly decorative, and expensive diversion of the people’s attention from the real decision makers.
By the way, I read years ago that a member of the royals was a Nazi sympathizer. Anyone know if the royal’s name was ever published?
Richard Paulsen says
Probably he. He was not from the beginning, Had to inhert a duchy of Sache-Coburg and Gotha in Germany belonging to the Queens deceased husband Albert. Other relatives had refused. He had to to accept it. Had no alternative. Just 16 years of age.
http://knowledgenuts.com/2014/08/01/queen-victorias-nazi-grandson/
ElderlyZionist says
That was an interesting story. Thanks.
Richard Paulsen says
You are welcome.
utis says
Thanks for the info, Richard. I think Gravenimage’s info (see below) may be closer to what I’m looking for. I believe I heard this story around the time of Rudolph Hess’s (sorry if the punctuation’s wrong) suicide. He had suddenly flown off to England, but was captured and imprisoned. The story I read went that Hess was trying to contact people in England who would help end the war. A royal was among those people, but the whole thing was hushed up after the war. Dead men tell no tales.
MikeC says
Edward the prince of Wales (Edward V111) one of the great wimps of the 20th century.
gravenimage says
Yes, people can change.
For instance, thirty years ago I was pretty clueless about Islam–as were most of us.
But has Prince Charles ever repudiated this ugly antisemitism, and said that his views are now different? I don’t believe so.
As for the pro-Nazi sympathizer, Utis, this was Edward, who married Fascist-loving divorcé Wallis Simpson and abdicated the throne in favor of his brother, who would become King George VI.
Britain, the Allies, and the entire free world very much dodged a bullet here.
utis says
Thanks. Edward does sound high enough up the tree to be the candidate. We’re all living in the middle of a whole lot history right now. Let’s hope Prince Upchuck of Eurabia doesn’t break England’s chain of luck.
gravenimage says
Agreed, Utis.
Carolyne says
Yes, his name was Edward called by his family David. He married Wallis Simpson, a twice married American with two ex-husbands living. This was not acceptable to the Church of England nor the Parliament, so he was forced to abdicate to marry “The woman he loved.” His brother, the present Queen’s father, became King.
After his marriage, he became the Duke of Windsor and he and his new wife visited Germany and gave the Nazi salute many times. They were personal guests of Hitler. They lived in France but fled to Portugal after the Nazi invasion of France. England, knowing his Nazi sympathies, sent his as far as they could. He became the Governor General of the Bahamas.
WorkingClassPost says
He was OK with talking about ‘foreign’ Jews, in the Jewish homeland way back then.
Wonder how he is with talking about foreign Muslims in his own homeland today – that’s here in UK and also in Germany, btw.
Richard Paulsen says
Or here in Sweden as well. A muslim party intending to take part in the next general election in September 2018.
It is being named “Jasin” after Ya Sin sura 36 in the Quran. Being paid from Qatar, the richest country in the world. Richer than China and richer than U.S.A.
There was an administrative mistake registering the party. Might be corrected till September 2018.
Political parties like that probably becoming more and more common as Muslim population in Europe is growing. Winning elections in every country in Europe. Must be stopped.
Pong says
Election of the moslem mayor of London shows that the moslems don’t need to be in majority to take the country over. There are enough brits, who are willing to offer them their votes. After all , they share an emotional goal to get rid of the jews. In the short few years britain will have not a single jew and that will be accomplished by the moslems. Brits on the other hand will continue to take position they have taken years ago, which is islamisation as the price for jewish free britain.
Voytek Gagalka says
Since it is against the law in Canada to say anything against members of the Royal Family, I must hereby use substitute for my outburst: The Prime Minister is not included with that ban. Thus: Trudeau, you idiot, asshole, motherfucker, good-for-nothing blockhead, miserable swine, barking dog, pandering to Mohammedans bum, vicious moronic fuckhead, lunkhead and gaby – to HELL WITH YOU, &#^@%!@!!!
Kilfincelt says
Big thumbs up! I’m an American citizen so I can say that your comment is as true of Trudeau as it is of Prince Charlie who has always been a bit of a buffoon. I can think of former U.S. Presidents-one in particular-for whom your comment is equally appropriate.
Linda says
Prince Charles should stop being a shill for the Saudi Royal family before he gives advice to anyone else.
Dawn says
He needs to know what he is talking before he opens his big gob .
Champ says
Dressed for his part as a useful tool. Look at this swashbuckling dhimmi fool …wow whatta useful tool for islam and company!
gravenimage says
True, Champ–an incredibly ugly dhimmi!
R Russell says
Please, let the queen outlive him!!
gravenimage says
Seconded, R Russell.
There was a recent article in Life & Style Magazine that said that the Queen had decided that the succession would skip Charles in favor of her decent and sane grandson William.
I was saddened to see this story debunked.
DRHazard says
Prince Charles definitely received the best education possible. But did he deserve it? Apparently he either learned nothing about the history of the Middle East, hates Jews because he learned a skewed view of the area’s longstanding conflicts (highly likely in the UK), was provided a decent historical account of Middle Eastern history but somehow avoided learning that subject, and/or he just hates Jews. Which is more likely, that Prince Charles didn’t learn proper history due to his own disinterest and inadequate intelligence or that he learned the predominant anti-Israel version of history among university professors and never challenged their conclusions?
Either way he is not definitely not “leadership” material. He is also unworthy of being considered any kind of authority on the Palestinian conflict due to his own internal shallowness which originated from, and is supported by, the external shallowness of the people he turns to for information and admiration.
R Russell says
Charles’ education may have been at the best establishments but he was not top of his class.
Qualifications: five O-levels, two A-levels (history B, French C), 2:2 degree in history, Cambridge.
I wonder what branch of history he learned for it certainly wasn’t about the Middle East.
Perhaps he hopes to remain king once the hijrah to the UK is complete and he is given the chance to convert or die.
Lydia says
Eooooooooouwww neoooooouw!
Hwhattt ehvah aaah doz Brits slipping into this poor chap’s tea?
Dear meeee!!!
MFritz says
And who takes bonny prince Charles serious?
Now King Charles III would be a different thing…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=266RearkkKU
R Russell says
Please don’t insult the original Bonnie Prince Charlie. He was a chancer but nothing like the present Charles.
Incidentally, the Prophet of the Covenant, Sandy Peden, Presbyterian,stated at the times of slaughter in Scotland due to the determination of the Stuart kings to impose Anglicanism upon them against their will, that there would never be another Stuart king on the British throne.
Had he been believed, the Battle of Culloden would have been avoided. The Scottish people never accepted Anglicanism, refusing to have a monarch at the head of the church.
MFritz says
“Sometimes the quip is the stroke that hits to deep.”
I had no intention of insulting – or even comparing – Charles Edward Stuart to Charles Windsor. There are quite a number of (light)years between them! Especially in regards to character and style.
Infidel says
Have the highest respects for Jews. Many Hindus love Jews because we find many parallels with them in terms of intellectual capabilities and all that… More importantly, their courage to stand up ALL ALONE against the Islamic thugs…which alas, Hindus do not show..
Dapto says
Just like Soros Charles is a Nazi
nicholas william tesdorf says
Prince Looney is alright when he is talking to his flowers, but when strays into the realm of Islam or ‘Climate Change / Global Warming’, he is totally out of his depth and seizes upon totally the wrong theory.
el Cid 2 says
One of Charles’ titles is “The defender of the Faith’ (meaning Anglican or Episcopalian Christianity ) Instead he is said to have stated that he is no longer a ‘Defender of the Faith’ but a “Defender of the FAITHS’ – whatever that means (but it doesn’t sound as if he is defending Christianity).
gravenimage says
The title “Defender of the Faith” is an old one, and dates back to before the break of the Church of England with Rome.
It was never intended to refer to the vicious creed of Islam, though.
FYI says
Perhaps Ponce Charles should convert to islam.
God knows,he’s dumb enough and clearly lacks the intellect to differentiate between God and allah.
Ponce Charles is a most excellent dhimmiwit.
AnneCrocket says
“I know there are so many complex issues, but how can there ever be an end to terrorism unless the causes are eliminated?”
That he wants to eliminate the causes of terrorism, and that he calls foreign Jews the cause of terrorism leads me to a fairly bleak conclusion.
Frank Anderson says
Hitler said similar about Jews from his first public speech. With the Nazi/muslim connection should anyone be surprised? “if it walks like a duck. . .” strongly suggests where Charles’ “thinking” and sympathies are placed. He’s a duck!
gravenimage says
Grimly true, Anne. I can’t imagine any other interpretation. *Ugh*.
Hugh Fitzgerald says
The letter Prince Charles wrote was to his older friend, Laurens van der Post, who had a line in Deep Thoughts of the kind that would impress the impressionable Charles who, naively, believed all the stories that van der Post told about his own life, though he was a fantasist about much of it.
One piquant detail: It was revealed that in 1952 Laurens van der Post had fathered a child with a 14-year-old girl, the actress Evadne Baker, who had been under his care during a sea voyage to England from South Africa. He was her guardian and trusted escort to London, where her parents were sending her to take up the place she had won at The Royal Ballet School. Her pregnancy prevented her from pursuing her goal of becoming a ballerina, it has been claimed, but she was in any case rejected by Sadler’s Wells Ballet at age 17 for being too tall. His reputation as a “modern sage” and “guru” was questioned, and journalists published examples of van der Post’s embellishing the truth in his memoirs and travel books. These and other facts were brought together in J.D.F. Jones’s Storyteller: The Many Lives of Laurens van der Post (2001).[
If you want examples of Laurens van der Post’s profundities,simply google “Laurens van der Post” and “quotes.” Some of these Deep Thoughts may remind you of the Deep Thoughts of someone else who has a taste for underage girls, Professor Tariq Ramadan.
gravenimage says
Prince Charles friends with a pedophile creep who took advantage of a girl who was supposed to be under his care? No wonder he is so fond of Islam…
Winston says
Charles’s whimsical ways, his friends, his tastes in women, etc. is not the issue.
The question commenters should be discussing is:
Is there an all powerful Jewish Lobby in America, as Charles and others believe?
Hugh Fitzgerald says
Or should the questions be:
1)what has the “Jewish lobby,” such as it is, pressured the American government to do that it otherwise should not have done ? I can’t think of anything.
2) if this “lobby” is so powerful,why couldn’t it get the American government to pressure the
British not to close off all Jewish immigration to the area east of the Jordan, which was done in 1922 in response to Arab demands?
3) if this “lobby” is so powerful why has it still not been able to have our Embassy moved to Jerusalem?
4) in the world at large, at the U.N.’s General Assembly, Security Council, Human Rights Commission, UNESCO, etc. just how powerful is this “Jewish Lobby” as compared to the Arab and Muslim lobby that appears to dominate every discussion of the Middle East?
5) one of the main efforts of the “Jewish lobby” is to fight examples of antisemitism, as in Saudi textbooks, or in the statements of some European politicians. They are to be applauded for this, not denounced.
gravenimage says
Bravo, Mr. Fitzgerald!
c matt says
Well, there are Jews and then there are Jews. The Israeli Lobby, not the “Jewish Lobby,” does need to be resisted. It seeks to further the interests of the State of Israel through US economic and military might. While there is nothing wrong with trying to get someone to take your side, the US needs to look out for US interests, not those of other countries. As for Jews vs. “Jews”, there are too many secular, dare I say atheist, Jews who use their religious/cultural background as nothing more than cover to push a leftist atheist agenda, basically screaming “anti-semite!” at anyone who dares criticize their progressive viewpoints. No doubt this very comment will draw such an attack.
gravenimage says
Israel is one of America’s staunchest allies, and we share most interests.
RL Robison says
No surprise here. While Charlie may fancy himself a new Lawrence of Arabia, he has too frequently proven himself to be a spoiled, faithless, antisemitic, disconnected d****bag. And it is not surprising that his coddled sense of self-importance is impressed by authoritarian Islam, just as so many upper-class and titled Englishmen of the 1930’s were favorably impressed by Hitler and his Nazi party. GOD alone can save Britain when Queen Elizabeth finally turns over the royal reins to her feckless eldest son.
Tom says
Charles is a typical example of the result of inbreeding. He is clueless as to the state of the world and how we got where we are today.
It was his grandfathers brother who actually supported Hitler and had to abdicate his crown. Seems like Charles is following the same misguided path.
Troybeam says
Charles has always shown his sense of stupid all his life, this man should never ever become King and his mother The Queen knows this however royal rules dictate a certain protocol which I truly hope The Queen looks beyond that and makes William King instead, after all William was raised by his Mother Diana and Charles was raised by nannies and teachers, which do you think got the better education.
henner720 says
ptinz charloum has child vaginal blood on his hands.cant win charley. choose your own ppl, stop pretend you roleplay as an arab khalif.how many seconds charlalulalej would you last in a correction facility.
.
mach37 says
I can’t stand watching “Lawrence of Arabia” anymore. It appears that the leaders of Saudi Arabia are more or less satisfied with staying where they are; if only the other Muslim leaders would be satisfied with staying in THEIR lands.
Of course the problem is the Qur’an and Hadiths. Until they are modified, or at least the many violent passages are declared unfit for civilized people by ALL Imams, there is no hope for peaceful coexistence between Islam and the rest of the world. When one side insists on dominating all other religions, and anti-religions, there can be no peace.
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
yes, foreign Jews,especially those from the evil United States, are factors of disasters in the middleast. The indigenous Jews who have been with Arabs for centuries never creat problem. It was one foreign Jewish Rabbi who issued a religious decree to the effect that one fingernail of a Jew worths one million Arab lives,which means if an Arab injures a Jew the brutal evil Zionists are justified to kill one million Arabs. Look at this savagery!!
Flavius Claudius Iulianus says
“yes, foreign Jews,especially those from the evil United States, are factors of disasters in the middleast.”
You’re blaming what Mohammad did to you on the Jews.
“The indigenous Jews who have been with Arabs for centuries never creat [sic] problem.”
Most of those Jews (~800,000) were driven out of the middle eastern Mohammadin countries, and they and/or their ancestors now reside in Israel. And despite your Wahhabist propaganda, they were never ‘comfortable’ as dhimmis.
gravenimage says
The vicious Ibrahim itace muhammed wrote:
yes, foreign Jews,especially those from the evil United States, are factors of disasters in the middleast.
………………………..
“Disasters”–i.e., the survival of the civilized state of Israel.
More:
The indigenous Jews who have been with Arabs for centuries never creat (sic) problem (sic).
………………………..
Ibrahim itace muhammed has claimed this before–that dhimmi Jews really love being persecuted, raped, and murdered by Muslims.
As for his claim that Wahabbis and ISIS are “Zionists”, he has never explained how the ideology of these groups is anything other than orthodox Islam.
Ibrahim itace muhammed himself has himself affirmed that such things as keeping sex slaves, committing genocide against the Jews, murdering those who criticize the “Prophet”, and mass murdering those who do not submit to Islam is Halal.
So why does he oppose these groups? He has never said, but I would guess that they represent rival Jihadists to his own gang. This is almost certainly just about an internecine power struggle, and not a difference in values.
Muslims have always accused their rivals of being “Jews”, no matter how implausible this is.
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
Flavius, I’m not a wahhabist. wahhabists are Zionists carryingout atrocities on mossad guidance. The deadly Isis Albagdadi(Elliott)is a Zionist mossad agent.
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
Flavius, I’m wahhabist are Zionists working for the evil state of Israel under mossad guidance
gravenimage says
Now he’s claiming he *is* a Wahabbist. Freudian slip?
Linda Goudsmit says
Prince Charles is no different from the Hollywood imbeciles who live in subjective reality and blame the Jews for the problems in the middle east. Personally, I think it would be of great benefit to the overprotected Prince to live unprotected in a Muslim country for three months and if the infidel survives he should then live in Israel for three months. Only after he has experienced the difference would I even consider listening to a word this oil driven royal has to say.