Professor Khaleel Mohammed of San Diego State University appeared in the film “Obsession: Radical Islam’s War With the West,” but then had the realization that he was aiding “Islamophobia” and repented publicly of his participation. Whether his coreligionists threatened him or he decided on his own to join the jihad, I do not know.
In any case, he unleashed several abusive tirades in my direction — “Satanic.” “Ignoramus.” “Bigotry.” “Crusader.” I responded here.
But what drove this mild-mannered professor to this frenzy of abuse? Why is it that opposition to jihad terror and Sharia oppression is so widely considered to be more heinous than actual jihad terror and Sharia oppression, especially in American academia? Find out in my book Confessions of an Islamophobe, and discover also what is at risk if the academic establishment and other Leftists continue on this path. Preorder your copy here now.
jihad3tracker says
WE CAN SAFELY CONCLUDE THAT SOMEONE NAMED AFTER THAT SICK “PROPHET” HAS THE MIND OF A CYBORG.
Charles says
Izlam has no prophet. Never had one. Though it did have a severely deranged Psycopathic Child diddler as a “Founder”.
This counterfeit of a “religion” was started by Satan himself when he met up with old Mo of the desert in a demon infested cave.
That’s why all muslum child diddlers, to this very day, try to use old Mo as the reason and excuse for their hideous crimes and sins!
GOD (YHWH) will soon cleanse the Earth of this vile infection!
sencit says
AMEN!
sencit says
Why, whenever I post a comment, is it always “awaiting moderation”.
I only said one word!
marc says
too many spammers recently, so we have moderation set to high is all 🙂
Charles says
Robert, how come a new “Charles” has been permitted to rant (using caps which I never do) on your site?
Ren says
Who’s the real satanic ignoramus? Khaleel Mohammed or Robert Spencer?
JawsV says
Mohammed. The original and anyone named after him.
mortimer says
Professor Khaleel Mohammed is exhibiting signs of reversion to cultish ideation. This includes 1] Authoritarian Leadership 2] Exclusivism 3] Isolationism 4] Opposition to Independent Thinking 5] Fear of Being “Disfellowshiped” 6] Threats of satanic attack or physical attack by vigilantes in the case of Islam.
It is likely that Professor Khaleel Mohammed is under threat by other Muslims… threats of being DISFELLOWSHIPPED from Islam, and thus becoming a deviationist or preaching KUFR (heresy or apostasy). Professor Khaleel Mohammed’s words were thus heretical at best or proof of leaving Islam at worst. His words were KUFR…a departure from codified, ratified, certified Islam.
By preaching KUFR, Professor Khaleel Mohammed deserves to be tried in a Sharia court and possibly executed if he does not recant. It appears that someone has got to Professor Khaleel Mohammed and he has recanted.
This illustrates the reason why no ‘MODERATE ISLAM’ or ‘MODERNIZED ISLAM’ is possible. The logic of Islam is this: whatever is perfect, complete and eternal cannot be improved or updated.
mortimer says
Professor Khaleel Mohammed is a coward. We know this because he has recanted from his honest, but unorthodox opinions about Islam and scurried back under the skirts of orthodoxy when his job was threatened by Islamists (presumably). What else could it be?
Professor Khaleel Mohammed is a coward because he cannot successfully debate Robert Spencer and defeat him in a properly umpired public debate, so he indulges in the three techniques of practically all Muslim debaters:
1) unproved ad hominem name-calling and slander, 2) assertions and claims which upon examination have no basis in fact 3) exclusion of evidence on some pretext which upon examination is fallacious or ‘special pleading’ (e.g. hurt feelings).
I call this ‘Islamic debating style’, since I have seen it hundreds of times. It is fundamentally a ‘raid’ technique: Muslims run straight at the opponent belligerently, insult him, throw sand in his eyes, slap him and then retreat before a defense can be applied. This gives the impression (to Muslims) that they have ‘beat’ the opponent. However, they have done nothing of the kind. This sort of ‘sand in the eyes’ pseudo-debate is a distraction from the debate. Muslims think that they can indefinitely continue to proceed by ‘sand in the eyes’ strategies, but we are on to them. Eventually, Muslims must stand and deliver by confronting REAL ARGUMENTS in a REAL DEBATE and they cannot do so.
We must continue to point out to the world that Islam cannot defend itself in a real debate and that’s why COWARDS like Professor Khaleel Mohammed AVOID REAL DEBATE WITH ROBERT SPENCER, the DEAN OF JIHADOLOGY.
Careless Castaneda says
Then there’s Tariq Ramadam, the James Dean of Jihadology:
hey girls, Islam is cool, huh -and Ah’m on mah lonesome tonight,
Ah’m on mah lonesome tonight.
Careless Castaneda says
Then there’s Tariq Ramadan, the James Dean of Jihadology:
Hey girls, Islam is cool, huh?
And Ah’m so lonesome tonight.
Ah’m so lonesome tonight.
Ah’m so loathsome tonight.
So loathsome …
Eur says
Someone who uses satanic insult can not be a teacher or professor. Muslims mix everything, Islam is not science. No religion is science but Muslims happily use oxymorons such as Islamic sciences,koranic sciences … and call themselves wise, teachers, professors … A scientist can not believe that a murderous pedophile visited the heavens on a night trip mounted on a Flying donkey
Barry says
Amazing that morons and/ or intentional deceivers/ liars and manipulators hold professorships. The educational system is severally broken in America. I always thought – or was led to believe that universities are where there is (or should be) the free flow of ideas, debate, discourse and critic….Critic has been for a while now flushed down the toilet, rendering true debate on any so-called ‘controversial’ topics and issues impotent/ non-existent. You either go lock-step with the establishment or you are flushed down the toilet…that smirky little mindless twit at Stanford is the poster-child of the neo-vanguard.
Barry says
Meant critique….
Stan Lee says
Due to the professor’s words, which he now claims were misspoken, I believe he received a few threats from his Islamic colleagues that he would be “in trouble” for expressing anything negative of Islam.
We know that there is no First Amendment in Islam.
Georg says
Calling Robert an “ignoramus” is akin to calling Superman a “wimp”. Wonder if this guy knows even 1/15 of the Koran verses as the one he foolishly denigrates.
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
People living off a sinecure tend to get bold. Here we have a professional liar calling a professional truth teller a liar… on the U.S. taxpayer’s dime.
Lydia says
Khaleel Mohammed of San Diego State University fits the description of:
“truthophobia.” “Satanic.” “Ignoramus.” “Bigotry.”
He must have drank the cool aid of delusion!
Jack Diamond says
Typical apologetics from Khaleel Mohammed (2015) da’wa in the San Diego Union-Tribune:
“Muhammad and his followers defeated their polytheistic enemies by the year 631, and additions to the Qur’an at the time declared that God had “finalized the religion and completed the Divine bounty upon Muhammad’s followers.” There was no need for further battles because Islam was about moral guidance and monotheism for Arabic-speaking peoples, not about land acquisition.”
If Muslim armies didn’t stay in Arabia (after snuffing out the Jewish life there) it’s not because of Muhammad or the Qur’an. It’s in spite of them, so the Professor would have the kaffirs believe.
He also will be performing magic tricks at the San Diego State talent show.
Jack Diamond says
more, “Some Islamic thinkers have called for jihad by issuing a pronouncement called a fatwa. But a fatwa is simply a learned opinion; it is not a religious verdict. With the rise of movements such as al-Qaeda, we have seen an upsurge of fatwas being issued by non-scholars. This is because the established Islamic jurists refuse to issue such proclamations, so upstart activists, doing much like Osama bin Laden did, have given themselves titles and mantles of authority.”
Disingenuous. A fatwa is a legal edict issued by a mufti or Mujtahid which is to say a religious authority.
More than an opinion, it has authority. In fact, it cannot be rescinded except by a religious authority of equal or greater stature. So, when that illustrious (sic) authority Khomeini issued a fatwa for the head of Salman Rushdie it was not only never rescinded, in fact, it was reaffirmed and remains in effect.
Pretending al Qaeda’s edicts were just issued by non-scholars ignorant of Islam is to ignore that Abdullah Azzam, the founder of al Qaeda, was a religious scholar of the highest stature. So, certainly, was bin Laden’s mentor Sheikh Omar Abdel-Rahman, head of Qur’anic studies at Al-Azhar at one time. Caliph al-Baghdadi’s credentials are not in dispute either. Rather than try to refute the strong Islamic arguments coming from al Qaeda or ISIS, the Professor tries to pretend they come from an illegitimate source therefore the merits don’t even have to be addressed. They do have to be addressed because they meet the criteria of authority for any fatwa, that is based on the evidence of the Qur’an and the hadiths.
Jack Diamond says
can’t resist one more little example of the Khaleel method:
“I would like non-Muslim readers to know that the very Islam they accuse of spreading violence first brought to the world what researchers refer to as “the scientific method,” and that for much of medieval history, texts by Muslims were used for research in medicine and physics. Ibn Khaldun, a North African Muslim, is hailed by many as the world’s first sociologist.”
Here is what his celebrated Ibn Khaldun had to say about jihad and the mission of Islam:
“in the Muslim community, the holy war is a religious duty, because of the universalism of the Muslim mission and (the obligation to) convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force”{because only Islam is} “under obligation to gain power over other nations.” (Muqaddimah, trans. Rosenthal, p. 183).
The OBLIGATION to convert EVERYBODY to Islam either by persuasion or FORCE
(violence Professor?). How does that go with “there was no need for further battles because Islam was about moral guidance and monotheism for Arabic-speaking peoples, not about land acquisition”? Refute Ibn Khaldun, Professor. Or was he another “upstart”?
http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/lifestyle/people/sdut-quran-hadith-2015dec19-story.html
gravenimage says
Fine posts, Jack. Thank you.
gravenimage says
San Diego State University professor Khaleel Mohammed on Robert Spencer: “Satanic ignoramus”
………………………..
“Satanic ignoramus”? This sounds more like semi-literate Muslim troll Ibrahim itace muhammed than a university professor. What an embarrassment.
More:
Professor Khaleel Mohammed of San Diego State University appeared in the film “Obsession: Radical Islam’s War With the West,” but then had the realization that he was aiding “Islamophobia” and repented publicly of his participation. Whether his coreligionists threatened him or he decided on his own to join the jihad, I do not know.
………………………..
So–now he has decided that violent Jihad terror against the West is OK? Why is he still being allowed to teach our children?
marc says
@Liatris Spicata This is not a matter of freespeech, you posted a comment with 3 links (2 to email addresses and one URL) they are always blocked regardless of who posted. and yes you have been banned, and i will be removing all your posts, you are free to say what you like on your own forum, but you are not welcome here, yes you know how to circumvent IP blocks, now jog on, your personal attacks on Spencer are not wanted here, he has enough elsewhere. I’ll be removing anything further you post and will become proactive if you press my buttons, I also know how to circumvent security.
gravenimage says
+1
Nicholas W Tesdorf says
Professor Khaleel Mohammed fills the bill of a “Satanic ignoramus”, far, far better than Robert Spencer ever did.
John Forbes says
WHEN ARE US GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS & STATE PEOPLE GOING TO REALIZE THAT THEIR DEMOCRACY IS BEING ATTACKED?
SO MANY SEEM UTTERLY CLUELESS & UTTERLY IGNORANT OF THE INTENT OF THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD & ISLAM!
GEORGE SOROS WHO IS ALLIED WITH THE LEFT & ANTIFA ( AND SEEMS TO BE THE BIGGEST FUNDER) KNOWS THAT STATISTICALLY ALL OF EUROPE MAY WELL FALL TO ISLAM BUT HE ALSO States THAT THE US – WOULD BE THE “HARDEST NUT” TO CRACK!
LET ALL OF THE US PROVE HIM RIGHT & DEFEAT HIM & THE LEFT & THE GLOBAL MARXISTS!
DEFEND YOUR FREE SPEECH & YOUT DEMOCRACY!
NEVER GIVE UP !!!!
FYI says
Speaking of satanic..could the Professor muhammed explain..
1.”The angel jibreel is the enemy of the Jews”
sahih al bukhari vol 4 book 60 no 3329
If this is so then jibreel is..the enemy of the God of the Jews{=God of Moses}
that makes the “angel”.jibreel ….the enemy of God Himself!
Since jibreel is defined as “the enemy of the Jews” is’nt it likely that jibreel belongs to the enemy of God:…..satan….?
Where does the koran come from then and where does this leave muslims if jibreel is clearly a fallen angel?
2.How could a mass-murderer possibly be a true prophet of God?
{Abu Dawud 4390}
800 Jewish men and boys murdered by the “prophet” muhammed.
why did muhammed happily break ALL of God’s Commandments and live such an immoral life(as is well documented in islamic literature)?
How is such a man a prophet of God???Explain.
How can a man who sold black people into slavery{sahih muslim 3901} be a role model for muslim youth?Good luck with that.
Yitz says
His imam probably threatened him to be beheaded so got scared