Stanford fascists are working themselves up into a fine froth over my scheduled appearance. They can’t stand the prospect of someone whose views dissent from those of the Leftist establishment being heard on their campus. It’s telling: it’s a tacit admission that they can’t refute what I say, and so they’re increasingly desperate to shut me down.
“This is dangerous. This is real. And we write this open letter because your blog post misses the point of why students are challenging Spencer’s booking, why this debate is not about free speech or national security – it is about the safety of thousands for whom your administration is responsible….See the face of one of your charges, one of our own, indicted by the court of Robert Spencer on a well-trafficked alt-right page…”
What are they on about? This fellow:
I previously posted his image in this post. Now: how did I come to find this young fascist’s picture in the first place? He himself posted video of himself tearing down posters advertising my appearance. And now four geniuses from Stanford, including three Ph.D. candidates (that shows you the value of a Stanford doctorate) are claiming that I’m endangering this poor snowflake by posting a photo from a video that he himself published.
Now back to reality: I have never called for or condoned violence against any individual. If this Stanford fascist is harmed by anyone, it would be a disgrace, and the perpetrator should be prosecuted. However, this young fascist is not really in any danger. The College Republicans at Stanford are not neo-Nazis, contrary to the defamation in this latest Stanford Daily piece. Nor am I. In reality, if my lecture at Stanford is not canceled, I will be there with bodyguards, because it is the Left that is violent, and it is a virtual certainty that if I walked onto the Stanford campus alone, I would be physically assaulted — remember all that “bash the fash” and “punch a Nazi” business.
In fact, Joshua De Leon, Umniya Najaer, Jason Beckman, and Jamie M. Fine are actively endangering me by smearing Jihad Watch as an “alt-right” site, “alt-right” being the Left’s dog whistle for racist, fascist, neo-Nazi, and all that.
This site is none of those things, but De Leon, Najaer, Beckman and Fine, whose intellectual acumen and honesty appear to be about on the level of Howard, Howard and Fine, are determined not to have an honest and open discussion, but to shut me down with defamation and smears.
I have a hunch that if a freed Guantanamo inmate were coming to Stanford, denouncing the United States and calling for violence against supporters of Donald Trump, De Leon, Najaer, Beckman and Fine would find it difficult to muster the same level of concern for the safety of Stanford students that they are claiming to have here.
They mention my latest book. Thanks, Joshua, Umniya, Jason and Jamie. In fact, the book is all about the demonization of opposition to jihad terror and Sharia oppression — in other words, it’s all about you. Preorder your copy of Confessions of an Islamophobe here.
“A response to ‘Advancing Free Speech and Inclusion,’” Stanford Daily, November 8, 2017:
An open letter to President Tessier-Lavigne and Provost Drell:
Yesterday morning, your office published a new Quad Notes post titled “Advancing Free Speech and Inclusion” – in the midst of campus controversy regarding next week’s booking of Robert Spencer, author of “Confessions of an Islamophobe.” This comes, too, in the wake of swastikas and white supremacist Identity Evropa posters appearing anonymously on buildings across campus. In your blog, you acknowledge that our national political moment is one of divisiveness and tension, and that we must “model” “respectful expression,” that “disagreement should not threaten an academic community, it should enhance it.”
Implicit in all of this is the understanding that if our community is threatened, there are limits to the expression we can condone; a line that we should not accept being crossed.
Yesterday evening, that line was crossed. Seven hours after your blog post, the image of a Stanford student – leaked without consent from the student’s Snapchat story and with the username visible — became the centerpiece of an article authored by Robert Spencer on his website JihadWatch.org, an aggregator site on the “violence” purveyed by “the general rubric of jihad” that Spencer claims is “a central duty of every Muslim.” The article contains a video of the student taking down Spencer advertisements and calls the student a “left-fascist,” asking why “Stanford’s fascist community [is] so angry that [Spencer is] set to speak? Are they for the jihad mass murder of innocent civilians? The beating of women? The execution of gays?”
As of this writing, the post remains online, with thousands of potential views of a member of our own community plastered on an alt-right website.
This is dangerous. This is real. And we write this open letter because your blog post misses the point of why students are challenging Spencer’s booking, why this debate is not about free speech or national security – it is about the safety of thousands for whom your administration is responsible.
Your blog post posits acceptable protest as “without disrupting” the speech, missing the point that protest is disruption. Your post cites the Leonard Law that “prevents private universities from placing restrictions on students for speech that is protected by the First Amendment,” eliding the fact that this speaker’s views are antithetical with the very identity of many of our peers, eliding the fact that this speaker isn’t even a student.
You say you “welcome thoughts from the community on other steps the university can take.” But people all over this community have shared their thoughts, have signed petitions, have voiced their concerns – not just against the legitimization of this particular speaker, but against a systemic reluctance. A reluctance to understand the difference between a dialogue, like the universal health care debate you cite, and the providing of a platform for an ideologue whose rhetoric actively makes members of this community feel unsafe. You say you “view this post as the beginning of a conversation,” but the post reads with the finality of a decision that we, the student body, have been stripped of the agency to shape. It’s not a conversation if you throw the Fundamental Standard at us while implicitly condoning a speaker who violates the first clause, “to respect and uphold the rights and dignity of others.” It’s not a conversation if you don’t hear us.
So hear us. Hear us when we say that your post feels like a silencing, not a call to inclusion. Hear us when we say that your post conflates the “controversial” and the “provocative” with the grotesque. Hear us when we question a speaker who is not entitled to the cachet of the Stanford name, and who through qualifications outside of stoking controversy certainly has not earned it. Does the attitude, the rhetoric, the public expressions of this speaker reflect the “sense of mutual respect” you are hoping to encourage within the Stanford community?
And then look at the website. See the face of one of your charges, one of our own, indicted by the court of Robert Spencer on a well-trafficked alt-right page, and know that a blog post that equalizes that with “inclusivity” is a blog post that doesn’t express the principles we know we share, that were written into the Fundamental Standard for over a century: Respect for “morality,” for “the rights of others as is demanded by good citizens. Failure to do so will be sufficient cause for removal from the university” – and that includes those we bring within our home.
Signed,
Joshua De Leon, coterm M.A.
Umniya Najaer, first-year Ph.D.
Jason Beckman, second-year Ph.D.
Jamie M. Fine, first-year Ph.D.
jihad3tracker says
JUDGING BY THE ABSOLUTE PANIC IN THAT OPEN LETTER FROM STANFORD CAMPUS TOTALITARIANS, weather forecasters there will be leading their evening report with “Well, be prepared folks, because Hurricane Robert has some local Leftist snowflakey stormtroopers directly in its path.”
harbidoll says
me thinks Robert needs a plan B. His talk aint gunna happen.
Bill says
What is becoming more and more obvious is that America is quickly sliding away into leftist fascism. The attacks on the truth and on Robert are relentless. I have watched, listened and read many (many) hours of Robert’s creation, and never once have I heard him advocate for violence. In fact, the opposite is true. His writings are solely about the violence of this so called religion.
If their prophet Muhammad was alive today he would be tried for crimes against humanity and for war crimes. Then he would be hung like Saddam Hussein. Anyone who believes this is a religion of peace has not done their homework.
However, how do peaceful people, much like Robert, fight this evil? By speaking out, by educating, by informing and by devoting their life to being an informed representative of the truth. God help us all if Robert, and the many people like him, do not succeed.
Jan Sobieski says
My God, Stanford is populated by panicking chickens and dodo birds. How can a person seeking a PhD degree agree to such a vulgar baseless petition without researching Spencer’s writings and website.?
Behold, they did invite everyone to go to jihadwatch and look at the ‘obscene’ writings of Spencer. lol. . Not a smart move.
Linde Barrera says
Wow! These 4 Stanford bratty narcissists really know how to shoot the bull and blame Robert Spencer for their total lack of empathy to those who have been murdered, disfigured or orphaned because of Islamic principles and doctrines. And they object because Robert Spencer is calling out those Islamic principles and doctrines. I don’t really wish them any harm, but they sure do need a good butt whipping for their stupidly.
gravenimage says
+1
jihad3tracker says
HELLO LINDE & GRAVENIMIAGE —- Yes, bratty narcissists should get a good butt whipping ! So, for ALL READERS HERE, those 4 signers in Robert’s post probably have accessible email addresses.
CHOOSE ONE OF THEM to send a fact-based pushback — with specific quotations from the Qur’an and Hadith, plus examples of Muhammad’s sick violent life.
You will, of course, get intense hostility as a response; put the addresses into your SPAM folder so there should not be any more annoyance.
gravenimage says
+1
Rob says
but is it really their stupidity or are they just plain evil?
JawsV says
Both.
harbidoll says
Your not showing “mutual respect nor Morality”. If they only knew, but by then it will be too late.
larry says
So much for the value of a Ph.D. from Stanford, these days. These knuckleheads are our future? God help us!
Westman says
Tell us again, who put his video on YouTube? He did?
And the erudites are blaming Robert Spencer for the student’s notoriety and their perceived endangerment?
These cannot possibly be professors of science or mathematics, it’s simply too illogical. And the student is endagered in CA SJ Warriorland? What nonsense – he’s a leftist hero.
The school’s Young Republicans are the only endangered students for daring to properly explore all sides of social issues. They may be the last sanity left at Stanford.
Max Publius says
Universities are only good for science labs today. You pay 60k a year for bunsen burners and the like. The humanities have become a joke. MOOCs, Meetups and self-study are better just because they’re no worse quality but far cheaper. These left-fascist drone students are destroying their own degrees. They obviously did not analyse Jihad Watch and it’s commitment to human rights. Probably they don’t even know the vast difference between the great Robert and the vile Richard.
DRHazard says
We now live in a world where “I farted in public” can go two ways; “I farted in public and am proud of it” or “I farted in public, was emotionally damaged, and it only happened because all of the subconcious rage of the white people on the elevator made me forget to press the button for my floor”.
So the strategy of the lefties is take unwarranted, misplaced and often weird pride in the ownership of one’s faults and mistakes and/or blame white males for them. Sine both of these strategies will contribute to the sense of being “special” they both work. If you choose the “ownership” plan then find or form a support group. In both cases it is critical that the truth of your plight be confirmed everywhere you look. The solution involves total domination over the words and even thoughts of those who aren’t in 100% agreement with everything you say, do , think about or feel (especially “feel”). In the rare cases where one is able to dominate the other then “farting in public” will either be elevated to the status of virtue, or will lead to serious legal problems for anyone who has ever done or said anything that might make you think he dislikes you because you farted in public.
“So shut up and breathe through your mouth, you ignorant fartophobic racist”.
gravenimage says
Stanford fascists claim Robert Spencer is endangering fascist student who tore down posters about his event
……………………..
Well, this is just ludicrous. This moron *himself* filmed and posted that video.
As for his being “indicted by the court of Robert Spencer”, have these idiots failed to notice that this guy filmed himself tearing down posters to Robert Spencer’s event?
And how does noting this “endanger” him? Clearly, he wanted people to watch this video. Robert Spencer pointed him out as an anti-free speech idiot. If they mean that some people didn’t applaud this stupidity, they are right.
How is that endangering him–unless they are now demanding that everyone has to regard his vandalism as some sort of heroism. Clearly, this is how he saw himself.
Wellington says
Logic, which you have in great measure, gravenimage, as does Robert Spencer, is not an “attribute” of the modern Left. Neither is proper knowledge, common sense and moral intelligence. (Not much of anything which is left {excuse the pun} after a dearth of all these, no?)
Oh yeah, the modern Left is a collective fool, gets virtually everything wrong, but how in the hell do you get through to such an aggregate fool? Chances are very good you never will.
On a related matter, what passes for higher education in America today is beyond pathetic. It has entered the realm of the absurd. Worst of all, there is no end in sight to this nonsense. Ah, it’s the 1960’s (I hate this decade, I really do) still working its many stupidities and travesties upon us all.
And bitterly ironic in this instance is Stanford University’s own motto, i.e., Die Luft der Freiheit weht (The wind of freedom blows). Not any more. Though Stanford in our time seems to have learned to blow in another way. Oh yeah. No doubt whatsoever. Take care, my astute friend.
Bezelel says
Wellington, I believe it was Ronald Reagan who said that the liberals aren’t bad people, they just believe the wrong things. I wonder what he would say now. That these specimens we’re speaking of, actually aren’t liberals anymore but have morphed into some chaotic mass who are driven to self destruction in the name of “inclusiveness” at all costs.All Inclusive unless you’re exhibiting signs of rational behavior. They have drop kicked the standard for sanity into the sewer and viciously attack anyone who tries to retrieve it.
Wellington says
Yes, Bezelel, liberalism of old, which is still barely around (examples being Dershowitz and Lieberman), has morphed into a modern liberalism which many call leftism. Dennis Prager, as an example, makes a studied point to distinguish between liberalism and leftism though I believe there is a connecting link between the two because while old-fashion liberalism certainly did not want to repress free speech and was ready to recognize and fight evil, it did want more government than conservatism did and more government invariably leads to all kinds of negatives. Old fashion liberalism also tended to be not appreciative enough of many of the merits of the traditional establishment (e.g., the importance of prayer in the public schools which a 1962 Supreme Court case did away with). It rather at times, to use an old cliche, wanted to throw the baby out with the bath water.
Conservatism of old is still around in large measure. Not much difference between Goldwater conservatives and conservatives of today (RINOs of course don’t count but they were around in the Goldwater days too). But of course even the staunchest conservatives have had a very difficult time thwarting the growth of government. For instance, Ronald Reagan while President was unable to do away with a single government program. As he himself said, the closest thing to eternal life on earth is a government program. Even some old fashion liberals sometimes kinda’ got this. Joseph Lieberman while still Senator from Connecticut asked rhetorically what has the federal Department of Education ever accomplished?
Yep, something has happened to the left in the past half century that has not happened to the right. And it is definitely not a good thing for freedom, for knowledge, for the truth. No wonder leftism today has aligned with Islam since both are an enemy of liberty. Both very much tend to lie as well. Both are indeed an enemy of Western Civilization.
gravenimage says
All true, Wellington.
livingengine says
Trigger Warning! These people have zero credentials on the subject of Islam.
Joshua De Leon’s training is in creative writing, and Japanese culture
https://www.linkedin.com/in/joshua-de-leon-095068104/
Umniya Najaer Areas of Interest are : African and African Diaspora Literature; Black Studies; War on Terror; Ethnic Studies; Performance Studies; Poetry
https://web.stanford.edu/dept/MTL/cgi-bin/modthought/people/umniya-najaer/
Jason Beckman PH.D. STUDENT IN JAPANESE
https://profiles.stanford.edu/jason-beckman
Jamie M. Fine is not a Stanford student but, rather, an assistant professor at the University of San Francisco. His training is in Environmental Services.
https://www.linkedin.com/in/jamie-fine-6511b28
Flavius Claudius Iulianus says
Wow. Good research livingengine!
But surely, livingengine, at least one of them must have a minor in finger painting, no?
Emilie Green says
Facts would suggest that De Leon, Najaer, Beckman and Fine were purchasers of and consumers of Brighto (“Makes Old Bodies [& Minds] New”), sold to them by Ace Salesmen Howard, Howard and Fine.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xg5setzj2Mw
JawsV says
Ha-Ha!!!! The Stanford leftists allright, Emilie! Except, the Stooges are smarter.
Bill says
This is a standard leftist trick. They engage in fascist behavior, sometimes violent, and then accuse to victim of engaging in fascist behavior. Usually the accusations are made from a forum where there is strength in numbers or other support.
In this case, the perp runs back to his clutch of like minded fascists at Stanford who support, condone and inspire his bad conduct, and then accuse the victim of engaging in some form of hateful or dangerous conduct.
It works at Stanford because from the board of trustees, to the administration, to the faculty and the students, they all support this fascist behavior and want more of it. Stanford is, as most universities are now, institutions of indoctrination.
Little Mr. Fascist destroys property, interferes with free expression, and can count on going unpunished. He then leverages his bad acts into a basis to eventually argue that the event should be cancelled.
It is well within Stanford’s right and power to punish the perp, but they will side with him. That is why I maintain that this perp is merely a tool of the Standford board and administration.
gravenimage says
Bill wrote:
This is a standard leftist trick. They engage in fascist behavior, sometimes violent, and then accuse to victim of engaging in fascist behavior. Usually the accusations are made from a forum where there is strength in numbers or other support.
…………………….
Spot on, Bill.
Keys says
Bill says: “Little Mr. Fascist destroys property, interferes with free expression, and can count on going unpunished.”
Precisely ! I would like to know what the Stanford Administration does to discipline this “student” for ripping down those posters.
The College Republicans need to file a formal complaint (or whatever Stanford procedures require) against this self-incriminating vandal. And if nothing is done, does that mean conservative students can rip down posters they don’t like without consequence ?
Demand justice or expose the hypocrisy.
Bill says
The College Republicans are good, but they need to get better. Funding is part of it. Unlike the left, who has the ACLU and similar organizations to drop well-financed lawsuits at will, the YRs do not. Of course they should be suing Stanford for its support for the criminal fascists and the danger they pose to the YRs.. Such lawsuits take a long time, well beyond the time that the YR;s will be at Stanford. They do not have the time or money. Stanford has all the cards and has stacked the deck against the YRs..
Stanford is not going to punish the perps because the perps are doing exactly what Stanford’s board, administration and faculty want them to do. This perp and others like him are the institutionally handpicked tools of Stanford. Stanford will not verbally admit that. They may “tut tut” it with a wink. Perhaps a wrist slap will be meted out as a precaution against a lawsuit with business as usual to continue. Most likely they will remain silent. Stanford’s actions and lack of action make it plain.
The better and more enduring lawsuit, one that would survive the graduation of the YRs, would be in the way of a class action lawsuit for fraud, claiming a refund of tuition and triple damages. I have little doubt that there is plenty of Stanford marketing materials extolling the virtues of Stanford’s commitment to an open educational environment and encouragement of free expression and so on. Well, it is proving to be a grand lie. Discovery of Stanford board, admin, faculty and student association emails and documents would prove it beyond even the shadow of a doubt. It would get even better when the institutions start destroying the emails and documents in order to protect themselves.
I am using Stanford as the example here because of recent events, but there would probably be an even easier case to be made at UC Berkeley, Evergreen, and others. Also, since the action would lie in fraud, such a case would not have to be lodged only against government universities proving government action (essential to a 1st Amendment claim). Private universities could be taken on too. In fact, they are such insular leftist echo chamber country clubs, the emails and documents there would be abundant.
MFritz says
Remember what happened at Evergreen State College? They KNOW exactly that they’re committing crimes and they DON’T want to be filmed committing them.
And Stanford should not listen to these CRIMINALS but simply EXPEL each and every one of them.
Veracious_one says
Robert Spencer reports on what the Muslims are saying and doing…..and just who is saying and doing these things?…oh yeah…they are…..you would like to think the audience would like to know the truth…
Norger says
“So hear us. Hear us when we say that your post feels like a silencing, not a call to inclusion….”
Mind blowing hypocrisy and stupidity. Hear me when I say that the attempts to shut down Robert Spencer (e.g. tearing posters off the wall, calling for a boycott etc.) IS a blatant attempt to silence speech you don’t like. Talk about lack of self awareness. Absolutely pathetic.
warren raymond says
These 4 activists will turn into nasty little shysters & SJW’s, milking the system for all its worth.
Ambulance chasing & grievance huckstering is already part of their DNA.
eduardo odraude says
What are their Ph.D.s in? Lesbian dance theory?
But seriously, Ph.D. theses, except in the sciences, today often don’t amount to anything more than a mishmash of ridiculous, fashionable, pseudo-intellectual biases tricked out in a shabby imitation of scholarly objectivity and festooned with conformist virtue-signaling.
To be politically correct usually takes zero courage, indeed today is more often the refuge of cowards and brownnosers. That some of the left would see the concept of “political correctness” as good does begin to justify use of the word “fascist” — or at any rate “proto-fascist” — to designate those celebrants of PC. I still recall when I first heard the term “politically correct” — I believe it was about 30 years ago, at a labor law firm in NYC, where a young lefty who worked there as an intern used the expression and seemed quite pleased by it. I was instantly disgusted by the idea of conformism as something to rally around.
Davegreybeard says
That “Howard, Howard and Fine” touch was just an inspired stroke of majesty Robert!
I just love what you do and the way you do it!
Boneshack says
I caught that, too. An oblique reference to The Three Stooges?
Too funny.
underbed cat says
A student whose candidate maybe the one who lost the election, who told her followers to resist and put swabs in their ears…maybe his went in a little too far…I guess if someone is afraid of information or different ideas’ he should just stay home..now that he ripped up your poster, poster himself on twitter doing so he can just stay home and curl up
at night and feel safe from words not intended to hurt but to inform. There are plenty who will listen….respectfully.
Don Vito says
The “victim” outed himself, seems most pleased with his actions. Civility down the toilet. Modern life and modern times by the tolerent ones.
St. Manuel II Palaiologos says
I think it was Jonathan Haidt who mentions how PhD students all have to tow the party line of their professors to get doctorates. The PhD is effectively dead in the humanities and social sciences.
It’s also a shame that these people are more dedicated to their own moralistic solipsism rather than reality.
mortimer says
Indeed… “solipsism”. Like all post-modernism.
Hugo Hackenbush says
I think the “geniuses” at Stanford got their advice from that eminent legal firm Dewey, Cheathem and Howe.
Andy says
They want to ban a common sense speaker such as Robert Spencer for telling the truth. I’m just sick of these mentally disordered liberal snowflakes!!!
We have been dealing with this nonsense now for 51 years, the pandora’s box was opened in 1966 and out came the deviants who are getting worse as time goes on.
This is what there teaching in Harvard University these days.
No wonder the western world is declining.
http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2017/11/08/harvard-hosts-anal-sex-workshop-entitled-what-what-in-the-butt/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5v0DCxLG4tY
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-5062593/Harvard-University-hosted-ANAL-SEX-workshop.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9K1JPwCDd4
Lydia says
They need to attend Robert’s lecture so they can finally GET AN EDUCATION in a reality sense!
Not a ‘mickey mouse doctorate’s degree’! They have just diminished the value of their credibility yet more.
Norger says
In a word, sophomoric.
mortimer says
The fact that Robert Spencer and his audience will require security guards to protect them is IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE that the real fascists are the Leftards.
No one has anything to fear from Robert Spencer’s speeches or from the Young Republicans. They both support the rights in the Constitution, unlike the Stanford Student Senate which only pays lip service to the rights of citizens.
JW_Reader says
What are these students complaining about? They can go to another feel-good lecture of their liking that is coming to their campus in end November.
========================
Islam and Human Rights by Karim Khan
“The speaker will argue that Islam advocates the peaceful co-existence of peoples, religions and society and guarantees individual and collective rights. The speaker will assert that Islam is not contrary to human rights. Rather, human rights are a central feature of Islam. ”
========================
My guess that the Author will stress
1) Islam is the most socially just religion.
2)Muhammad was champion of Women’s right.
3)The first LGBTQ community in the world was formed under Muhammad.
4)Islam teaches only peace and tolerance.
5) 9/11 was a Jews conspiracy that never happened.
Norger says
“Human rights are a central feature of Islam.” That’s rich. I wonder if anyone will attempt to point out to this speaker that the Cairo Declaration of Human Rights, to which all Muslim countries presently say they adhere, expressly limits “human rights” to those “rights” which are consistent with Sharia. (“Human rights” for apostates, blasphemers, women, gays and non-Muslims are let’s say, not so good). So it’s OK to allow Mr. Khan to “argue” for a thesis which is, on its face,brazenly dishonest, but Robert Spencer, learned scholar, author and former anti-terrorism trainer for the US military cannot be allowed to speak.
gravenimage says
What Taqiyya. Of course, Islam rejects all human rights.
James Stamulis says
These college sheep act as if they grew up in the Soviet Union and i am starting to believe they have.
Dwight hogg says
The tired excuse that all the hatred and violence aren’t Islam – that the religion of peace is a beacon of love and understanding. Iran, the main sponsor of state terrorism stones girls to death still, executes gays, and is working to have nuclear weapons is not Islam?. Saudia Arabia is also a state sponsor of terrorism and is building mosques throughout the West preaching hate and Sharia is not Islam? The Taliban which flogs women, throws acid in the faces of girls who simply want an education, or simply shoots them in the head as they did to Malala is not Islam. Pakistan with its blasphemy laws which outlaws any criticism of Islam on the penalty of death or imprisonment is not Islam? And all these Islamic countries commit human rights abuses that would make Hitler proud. The plethora of Imams in the West who call for the death of our Jewish neighbors or who are preaching that it is just fine for old men to marry 10 year olds don’t represent Islam. And our Human Rights Commissions in Canada do nothing about these Imams calling for violence and murder. But anyone criticizing these actions of Muslims are committing the sin of Islamophobia and hate speech which our Human Rights Commissions and Liberal Govt officials are eager to pounce on. And the Liberals are eager to hand over tens of millions to Muslims who have put themselves into bad situations in the crap hole countries of the ME. It is our fault that they are stupid enough to put themselves in danger. And Canada has no right to monitor their actions when they are in jihad land.
JawsV says
Why in the world does the 21st century protect Islam? It’s absolutely nuts.
Le Hunt says
This isn’t fascism, this is out and out communism. Call them what they are: communists.