Surprised? Don’t be. The Qur’an depicts the Jews as inveterately evil and bent on destroying the well-being of the Muslims. They are the strongest of all people in enmity toward the Muslims (5:82); they fabricate things and falsely ascribe them to Allah (2:79; 3:75, 3:181); they claim that Allah’s power is limited (5:64); they love to listen to lies (5:41); they disobey Allah and never observe his commands (5:13). They are disputing and quarreling (2:247); hiding the truth and misleading people (3:78); staging rebellion against the prophets and rejecting their guidance (2:55); being hypocritical (2:14, 2:44); giving preference to their own interests over the teachings of Muhammad (2:87); wishing evil for people and trying to mislead them (2:109); feeling pain when others are happy or fortunate (3:120); being arrogant about their being Allah’s beloved people (5:18); devouring people’s wealth by subterfuge (4:161); slandering the true religion and being cursed by Allah (4:46); killing the prophets (2:61); being merciless and heartless (2:74); never keeping their promises or fulfilling their words (2:100); being unrestrained in committing sins (5:79); being cowardly (59:13-14); being miserly (4:53); being transformed into apes and pigs for breaking the Sabbath (2:63-65; 5:59-60; 7:166); and more. They are under Allah’s curse (9:30), and Muslims should wage war against them and subjugate them under Islamic hegemony (9:29).
And with the Left completely sold out to the Islamic agenda, it is no surprise at all that Nasreen Khan is running as a Labour candidate.
“‘Hitler wasn’t the bad guy’: Labour faces new anti-Semitism storm after mother who posted vile Facebook rants is short-listed for party safe seat,” by Tom Witherow, Daily Mail, November 10, 2017:
The Labour Party is embroiled in another anti-Semitism row after a mother who questioned Hitler’s reputation was shortlisted to fight a council seat.
Nasreen Khan, a former member of George Galloway’s Respect Party, made offensive remarks about Jews on Facebook five years ago.
She said Jews ‘have reaped the rewards of playing victims’ and that there were ‘worse people than Hitler in this world’.
Miss Khan, a Muslim who has since joined the Labour Party, said they were ‘inappropriate and unacceptable’.
But despite the remarks, she is on a two-person shortlist for the Labour nomination in a safe seat in Bradford at next year’s local elections.
A final decision is expected to be made on Friday.
In 2012, writing under a video titled ‘The Palestine you need to know’, she said: ‘It’s such a shame that the history teachers in our school never taught us this but they are the first to start brainwashing us and our children into thinking the bad guy was Hitler.
‘What have the Jews done good in this world?’ When questioned about the comment, she had added: ‘No, I’m not a Nazi, I’m an ordinary British Muslim that had an opinion and put it across. We have worse people than Hitler in this world now.’ When she faced further online criticism she said: ‘Stop beating a dead horse. The Jews have reaped the rewards of playing victims. Enough is enough!’
Miss Khan, a mother, was also given a restraining order at Bradford Magistrates’ Court in November 2011 to protect a local solicitor and her family from harassment….
nicu says
I bet she was never blocked on FB ! – oh , wait : they only ban people who speak the truth AGAINST Islam .
mortimer says
The most disturbing issue is that such Jew-hater is a candidate for a major political party.
How can Labour support human rights if one of its candidates so obviously endorses GENOCIDE OF JEWS?
No reasonable, slightly moral person could vote Labour if they allow Khan to stand as a candidate.
Khan’s Jew hatred is beyond the pale.
martin says
What do you mean by ‘one its candidates’. what used to be labour but is now essentially the communist/islamonazi party has loads of jew haters even without the many muslims who hate jews due to islams evil teachingss.
Jeremy CONbin hates jews himself.
Richard says
She can do it because Britain is a democracy and there either are or soon will be more Muslims than Jews in Britain, and population equals votes. There is a very illustrative old book about the rise of Adolph Hitler: “And Germany Tried Democracy”. If trends continue, we may soon see the same thing in the United States. It is as if we were living in the middle of an alligator farm and bringing in more and more alligators. Surely, they won’t eat us!
Voytek Gagalka says
So, with coming (seemingly sooner rather than later) victory of Mohammedans over Britain, when it will be time for them to put monuments to Hitler in the Isles? And then they will still be considered as “allies” to America? Turkey de facto stop to be already; now is time for Britain. “Rule Britannia”? Not. Rather: “Rule Over Britannia!
Karen says
Yes, they’ll have to tear down all the monuments to Churchill; how offensive that he defeated Hitler and saved Britain. Sarc off.
Greyhound Fancier says
Plus, he really had the mohammedans pegged.
gravenimage says
Here’s a popular monument to Hitler in Indonesia:
“Indonesia: Museum official says wax Hitler ‘is one of the favorite for our visitors to take selfies with’”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/11/indonesia-museum-official-says-wax-hitler-is-one-of-the-favorite-for-our-visitors-to-take-selfies-with
God, I hate Islam.
mortimer says
Yes, GI. Have a look at this explanation of how Pakistanis LOVE HITLER.
http://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/the-fuehrer-cult-germans-cringe-at-hitler-s-popularity-in-pakistan-a-683966.html
gravenimage says
Yes–this is common all over the Muslim world, Mortimer. Turkey has banners of Hitler in an upscale mall, and there are many Muslim shops named for Hitler.
Santa Voorhees says
Ehi Antifa, did you heard this? Good hunting!
Mockingjay says
– If you happen to have dark-brown-to-black hair and eyes, and a bit of a tan, it’s COMPLETELY A.O.K. for you to admire Hitler as far as antifa is concerned.
There is just NO WAY you can be a nazi if you have those sort of physical traits.
– Only exception to the rule: if you’re also jewish. Then not even your physical characteristics can protect you from antifa’s hate.
eduardo odraude says
With clear logic, David Wood shows brllliantly that, based on the Qur’an’s own statements, if Christianity is true OR false, Islam must be false:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?annotation_id=annotation_2961338617&feature=iv&src_vid=syf3lqbdTCo&v=nNAS0aaViM4
WorkingClassPost says
She’s kinda right, though.
I’m not sure how many there might be, but I can think of one person who was much worse than Hitler…
gravenimage says
Yep–just what I was thinking…
mortimer says
Islam’s three source texts contain 9% Jew hatred, which more than the Jew hatred in Mein Kampf (7%).
Greyhound Fancier says
You could even say, that Hitler emulated that person in many ways…..
Save Europe says
1.3 billion?!?!
Kesselman says
This PoS mozzie aren’t of course aware that all she says about reaping the fruit of victimhood can be applied to the mozzies themselves. They are experts. In psychological terms it’s called ‘projection’ of the inner feelings.
Jayell says
The female muslim MP for Bradford West, Naz Shah, got into a great deal of trouble recently by demanding that girls abused by the muslim paedophile gangs should ‘shut up’ because they are threatening ‘social cohesion’. Apart from the fact that the statement was completely stupid and deluded because there is no ‘cohesion’ with the muslims in the UK anyway, such was the national level of utter disgust and offence with this obnoxious specimen that there were many calls and a petition for her to resign. She’s still there. What a surprise.
One would have thought that after all that fuss, these Disciples of the Prophet would have the sense to watch what they say. Apparently not. One could be forgiven for thinking that this female Khan must be related to the Great Khan of London Town because they both apparently share the same propensity to cause offence. Apart from Adolf Hitler’s well-documented litany of obscene sins against humanity, there are still millions of bona fide British citizens (i.e., not like Khan) who either actively fought against the Nazis or who suffered through the Blitz, and who would take this kind of inane verbal garbage as a personal insult. Now, why didn’t this thought cross her little mind before she opened her sizeable mouth? Silly question
Stan Lee says
Hitler was the center-piece “bad guy” of Nazism. He succeeded in building and structuring the Nazi movement throughout Germany through a well-organized Nazi propaganda establishment directed by Josef Goebbels. As Germany conquered a large part of Europe, and brought its influence into the Arab mideast, military assets were recruited of volunteers from Nazi conquered/influenced territories which saw action in Russia, Ukraine, the Balkans, convinced by Nazi promises to certain officers in the Egyptian Army, then working with the British Commonwealth military, Mideast & No. Africa, to mutiny against the British to weaken British forces prior to their defense of the Suez Canal. The British discovered this, Egyptian officers including Nasser and Sadat were among those Army officers arrested, the British had to divert troops to keep the Egyptian Army under quarantine so it could not engage in any deployments, for or against the No.African-Mideast British forces. The British also had to contain Iraqi Arab forces in Iraq because they too, had been influenced by Nazi propagandists to join the Nazi cause against the British. In other words British & Commonwealth forces were stretched to their limit,but still prevailed after containing hostile Arab forces which mutinied.
Hitler, the “bad guy” couldn’t do it all by himself, he had a large contingent of Nazis in Germany, Austria, and the conquered territories which fed volunteer military units in support of German troops in the field, in every Nazi-occupied territory. All that is never mentioned, but the small Baltic countries all had contingents serving as volunteers to both Nazi-German army units, plus S.S. units. A recent report on German and occupied German territories volunteers to the S.S. indicated that approximately 80% of S.S. personnel never faced any war-crimes trials and were free without hiding in the MIdeast or So. America. Hitler did instigate those war crimes, yes, he was “the bad guy,” but those believers in Nazism with blood on their hands were at liberty and whomever survived from that time are still at liberty, except any in Soviet Union territory who were hunted down, obviously the Soviets were not going to forget their crimes against Russian people.
mortimer says
There would have been no Hitlerism without Hitler, but there would have been no Hitler without the many devoted Nazis who promoted him and fanatically stood with him to the end even willing to commit suicide with him.
The Zeitgeist of Nazism in German grew of the Bavarian romantic movement and its irrationalism.
gravenimage says
Many aspects of the German romantic movement were benign, and contributed a great deal to art, letters, and music.
Fascism used superficial aspects of it, but is altogether much darker.
MFritz says
Too bad there isn’t a time machine around to send her back to 1942 and “experience” the “good guy” first hand.
eduardo odraude says
Hitler was allied with the Grand Mufti of Palestine, perhaps the leading figure of the Muslim world of that time. The Grand Mufti bears some responsibility for the Holocaust. Hitler had been letting hundreds of thousands of Jews escape Europe, in exchange for large ransoms. Many of the Jews went to Palestine. The Grand Mufti warned Hitler that if he wanted the Muslim world as allies in the war, Hitler had better hold on to the Jews and destroy them in place rather than letting them out to go to Palestine. What this means is that because of the Grand Mufti, Hitler’s anti-Jewish obsession now dovetailed with the German strategic necessity of having the Muslim world as allies.
gravenimage says
Hitler noted that he admired Islam, and despised Christianity.
Jayell says
“Too bad there isn’t a time machine around to send her back to 1942 and “experience” the “good guy” first hand.”
Well, obviously you can’t actually do that, but corporate dung heaps like the BBC regularly try that sort of thing on in their somewhat creative docu-dramas where they rewrite history. It would not surprise me to see one of their productions set during the London Blitz featuring a female muslim (yes it would have to be female largely because of the headgear) bravely scrabbling with her bare hands in the rubble to save the unworthy kuffar from what was once a house then going on to put out all the fires in the street single-handed. Or something about the Battle of Britain where the ace Spitfire pilot who shoots down every other German plane was recruited from Pakistan, with the girls at HQ (pushing the model planes around the table) wearing hijabs. Don’t laugh, it’s already happened! Now, what could they do in the ‘Dambusters’ remake?
MFritz says
The moment when the BBC finally lost its last bit of credibility:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltP2t9nq9fI
20 minutes in the future.
Diane Harvey says
They deny all of this to Western ears, but watch Muslims speaking the truth. It’s sobering,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ljqinq4abEA
eduardo odraude says
Very sobering.
gravenimage says
Even for someone as knowledgeable about the threat of Islam as myself, this is indeed sobering–just the sheer scope of the unhinged Islamic hate and violence we are up against. Thanks for the link, Diane.
Keys says
Diane, thank you for this montage every non-muslim should see.
If Robert Spencer showed this clip at Stanford, and said nothing else, the Stanford students protesting his campus speaking engagement would accuse him of hate speech.
butros says
I think the best thing is chaos, misery and suffering in the lands of the enemy… keep them in perpetual war killing each other… keep them out of america.
Linnte says
And you can read it for yourself in the Qur’an! Islamic hatred still continues to astound me, and every atom in my being rejects Islam.
eduardo odraude says
‘What have the Jews done good in this world?’
Hmmm. Christ was a Jew. Einstein was a Jew. How’s that for a start? How about having the only liberal democracy in the Middle East?
Why isn’t there a Palestinian state?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=76NytvQAIs0
gravenimage says
We could list many more, starting with the cure for polio and the long list of Nobel Prize winners.
Karen says
When she was called out on her rather asinine statements, she doubled-down with a dismissive hand wave. So her later ‘apology’ seems pretty insincere. But leftists won’t care, and many fools will vote for this person.
BTW Ms. Kahn, your anti-semitism is irrational. The entire world has been blessed by the Jewish people. You personally are no doubt protected by the Salk polio vaccine, as one small example.
Here are some questions you should ask yourself. When one needs the best medical care in the world, where does one go? When thinking of the great institutions of higher learning, research centers, and the great global charities which care nothing for a person’s religion, which regions of the world come to mind?
Can you please explain this statistic? Based on the tiny size of the global Jewish population, I’d say their contribution to the world is enormously outsized:
Jewish winners of Nobel prizes: 25%
Muslim winners of Nobel prizes: 0.5%
eduardo odraude says
Despite the fact that Arabs have a population 100 times the size of the Jews, Jews have won a hundred times as many Nobels in math, science, economics, etc., as the Arabs have won. Hence Jews, per capita, earn about 10,000 times more Nobels than Arabs win. (100 x 100 = 10,000). Muslims should abandon Islam, because that is the source of the problem.
eduardo odraude says
I meant to say “Muslims”, not “Arabs”.
gravenimage says
I hope British voters vote this thuggish Muslimah down.
Karen says
I hope so too.
overman says
Corbyn sacked another female MP for saying Britain has a problem with pakistani grooming gangs [the Truth] and yet this bitch is still around.
gravenimage says
Grimly true.
Guest says
Hitler hated Muslims too.
Wellington says
“Hitler hated Muslims too.”
No he didn’t. His Table Talk reveals no such thing. Hitler actually admired Islam because of its being spread by the sword. He thought Christianity a religion for weaklings, of course despised Judaism, but made an exception for Islam among his general hatred for religion because it appealed to his marital and Ubermensch proclivities. If you have evidence to the contrary, I would certainly like to know of such.
gravenimage says
Guest, Wellington is quite right.
Fred H says
If she continues to make statements like that, she is sure to win big in the constituency she could be selected for.
Keys says
Hitler not the bad guy.
Right, he was not the one who personally bombed and V2ed London and England, he did not sink British shipping, the wolfpack did. In fact the planes over England were Christian; I saw the cross markings on them – look at the historical film and photos ! Cross insignas ! The murderous Crusaders cleary did this. What more proof is needed.
Get this new information out to the Stanford history department.
Wellington says
Mohammed and Hitler. So much in common. Both only too ready to set up a world where a dominant group rules over all lesser groups (with only the grouping being different, one based on belief and the other on race). So, it should come as no surprise to anyone informed about Islam that a Muslim would look positively upon Hitler. Old news and all that. Nothing new to see here.
The common Jew-hatred by both Islam and Nazism only adds strength to the argument that Islam and Nazism have a great deal in common. Most certainly each also has a contempt for freedom. In fact, this is so easy to figure out that the wonder of it is that anyone but complete ignoramuses would be surprised anymore that Muslims aplenty have a positive view of Hitler, for instance this disgusting woman, Nasreen Khan. May she rot. Ditto for her belief system which is actually the seventh-century prototype for Nazism. Yes, when one thinks of Islam, one should think of Nazism. I challenge anyone to tell me why not. I certainly do and that is why something like the hijab to me is the equivalent of the swastika. And thus the burqa compared to the hijab is the swastika in even worse sartorial form, rather as the SS was in their black compared to the SA in their brown.
Terry Gain says
Nazism and Mohammedism are both evil ideologies with no respect for the sanctity of life. Of the two Mohammedism is more dangerous as it purports to be a religion and therefore gets a pass from the well -intentioned ignorant.
LeftisruiningCanada says
” when one thinks of Islam, one should think of Nazism. I challenge anyone to tell me why not.”
errr…..muslims dont like jack boots and wagner? muslim nations never invented any military technology more advanced than curvy swords?
Oh no, i’ve got it – islam rejects post modern epistemology. Yes, that’s it for sure.
Wellington says
Wagner’s music (even though Wagner was an anti-Semite) and German technology are merely “incidentals,” as are jack boots. They really don’t address the overall point I was making.
What is key, what is paramount, is that both Islam and Nazism are ideologies which are enemies of freedom and both single out certain groups of humans (Islam with non-believers, Nazism with particular ethnic and racial groups) for second-class status or death. Marxism can be put in this category as well. The “connection” here with these three malevolent ideologies is the totalitarianism that runs throughout them.
As for your “post modern epistemology” reference, you’ve lost me. Please explain.
LeftisruiningCanada says
Hi Wellington, Yeah i was just joking around with those, and do agree that islam and nazism do seem to have quite a bit in common.
As for the post modernity, it would seem to be one of the foundational differences between the two belief systems.
Post-modern, or counter enlightenment, philosophy underlies all fascist movements, nazism being but one. They generally disparage concepts of knowing that are grounded in external, objective, reference points for their truth claims, preferring instead to rely on subjective sources such as intuition, emotional feelings etc. The whole massive rally spectacle obsession that was seen in Germany is a product of that belief – mass communal experiences are a good way to seek and express (or create) consensual ‘truth’ and manifest the will of the people. The Fuhrer Princip also flows from this.
Islam is very different in this sense. Opposite perhaps. In islam there are very definite objective and transcendental truth claims which one must accept. Their entire understanding of how one can know truth is based upon external revelation from what they suppose is the ultimate source of all truth, allah.
If we were to contrast the two written sources concerned, of the national socialism as envisioned by Hitler in mein kampf, and of islam revealed in the koran, we see the difference in their ideas of truth-source quite nicely: mein kampf is the product of a man who was himself produced by his particular time and social influences which, it could be said, captured the feelings of a nation and brought them to focus. That nation eventually chose him to be their fuhrer, thus validating fascist ideas that truth is a product of society, which finds expression as individuals who act.
The koran however is the direct word of islams supreme being, and contains truth that applies to all times and places and is essentially eternal in nature.
Sorry to go on. its a subject of interest to me, though likely someone here could easily see the deficiencies in my learning. we do what we can with what we’ve got!
gravenimage says
Quite right, Wellington–these brutal totalitarian ideologies have a great deal in common.
gravenimage says
UK: Muslim Labour candidate says teachers “brainwashing us and our children into thinking the bad guy was Hitler”
………………………..
I have noted many times before that as much as Muslims hate and despise Infidels, they frequently make an exception for the genocidal, Jew-hating Hitler. Mein Kampf is a bestseller in the Muslim world.
And this is not just about the Holocaust–appalling as that is.
We would not be free today if Britain had not bravely fought the Nazis–sometimes alone. This evil Mohammedan’s words are a slap in the face to their bravery–including that of my mother and aunt, who both served in the British Army as young women during WWII.
More:
She said…that there were ‘worse people than Hitler in this world’.
………………………..
About the only one I can think of is the “Prophet” Muhammed himself…
Wellington says
Respecting the last person you named, gravenimage, I often refer to the bastard as the Profiteer Mohammed, but never by the usual appellation, though putting the word “Prophet” in quotes, as you have, is an alternative which is just fine as I can best determine things, though NEVER without the quotation marks. After all, no respect should be paid to this seventh-century murderer, rapist, narcissist, fraud, illiterate, bandit and pedophile.
Pull this SOB down and you pull all of Islam down. Islam cannot survive if Mo doesn’t. These twin evils are tied a the hip and so if one goes, so does the other. Reasonable minds can differ respecting which to emphasize the denigration of, but only ignorant or worse minds will attempt to sustain both.
Unfortunately, there are a lot of “ignorant or worse minds” still out there. In huge amounts. Damn shame, a burden to all the earth and what a waste.
gravenimage says
Yes, I use quote marks as sneer quotes in this case, Wellington.
You are right–Islam would not survive without the model of the pedophile, caravan-raiding, rapist, slaving, mass-murdering warlord, “Prophet” Muhammed. *Ugh*.
Greyhound Fancier says
How can you describe the perfect man in that fashion?
He is the model and hero of all mohammedan terrorists, all taqqiya artists, all UK sex grooming gangs, all those who run people over to obtain 72 black-eyed virgins, all those who are so very superior to all other people, you know, “the best people on earth”.
LeftisruiningCanada says
lowercase ‘muhammad’, and be damned with the spell checker. Surprised it’s not underlined in green.
gravenimage says
Of course, GF, it is fine to note these things about the “Prophet” Muhammed–as long as you do so in a laudatory fashion, and not to condemn his savagery.
Karen says
“including that of my mother and aunt, who both served in the British Army as young women during WWII.”
Ah, that’s where you get your fearlessness. You have good genes, gravenimage! 🙂
gravenimage says
Actually, Karen, my genes are very much a mixed bag.
But I very much appreciate your kinds words. Thank you!
Georg says
Two women named Naz. Both from Bradford. Both of Pakistani descent. Both Muslim. Both virulently antisemitic and bigoted. Both share Jew-hatred on Facebook. Both in Labour. Surely, a story that almost writes itself.
Alas, the BBC missed it.
LeftisruiningCanada says
This is how they take over.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFtoqAOEp1Q
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_British_Muslims
http://muslimnews.co.uk/newspaper/home-news/record-number-muslim-mps-elected/
Warren Raymond says
Just in case you’re wondering: her views are shared by the overwhelming majority of Muslims in the Islamic world. Hitler & the Nazis are held in high esteem in all Islamic countries I ever visited, and I have been to many. This mental baggage is shared by truck-drivers & teachers, labourers and university educated Moslems, politicians & peasants. Jew-hatred is deeply ingrained in their psyche, which swings wildly between inferiority complexes, conspiracy theories & pathological hatred caused by fiery rants about world conquest by the holy sword.
We cannot coexist.
JS says
The Shat of Khan..
mortimer says
Why do Muslims love Hitler? They will tell Germans why!
http://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/the-fuehrer-cult-germans-cringe-at-hitler-s-popularity-in-pakistan-a-683966.html
Excerpts: Germans Cringe at Hitler’s Popularity in Pakistan
Germans are popular in India and Pakistan, but not always for the right reasons. Many in South Asia have nothing but admiration for Adolf Hitler and still associate Germany with the Third Reich. Everyday encounters with the love of all things Nazi makes German visitors cringe.
Pakistan is the opposite of Germany. The mountains are in the north, the sea is in the south, the economic problems are in the west and the east is doing well. It’s not hard for a German living in Pakistan to get used to these differences, but one contrast is hard to stomach: Most people like Hitler.
Sometimes it’s better to keep quiet about one’s German origins. It’s embarrassing because people here think they’re doing you a favor by expressing their admiration for the Nazi leader. I suspect most Indians and Pakistanis have no idea what this man did. They see him as the bold Führer who took on the British and Americans.
In the Islamic world, not just in Pakistan but right across from Iran to northern Africa, anti-Semitic sentiment of course plays a role. Conversations with German visitors rapidly turn to the injustice being suffered by the Palestinians who were robbed of their land.
Georg says
“I suspect most Indians and Pakistanis have no idea what this man did. They see him as the bold Führer who took on the British and Americans.”
Right, they have “no idea” what Hitler did, don’t know we landed on the moon, and have never heard of Coca-Cola. Nobody reveres someone for whom they “have no idea what [he] did”. So, cut the crap. And their admiration for him has nothing to do with taking on anything but with his murder of 6 million Jews. They are celebrating the Holocaust. If this creep won’t say as much at least don’t run PR for their Nazi-loving, genocide-celebrating culture.
Karen says
“Right, they have “no idea” what Hitler did,…”
Thank you, and well said. I found that rather hard to believe myself.
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
Filthy Christians produced Jewish killers like Hitler,not Muslims .Throughout history Christians have been persecuting the Jews. First, Byzantine Romans killed and expelled Jews from Palestine until when Muslims sacked Byzantine from the Land and allowed Jews to come back. During crusade wars, filthy Christians carried out genocide killings of Muslims and Jews there that forced Jews to go into diaspora.The church in Spain issued a religious decree to the effect that both Muslims and Jews migrants must leave Spain or be killed. many Jews were killed and the rest fled and sought refuge in Turkey under muslim rulers of ottoman empire. Muslims never carried out mass killings of Jews. Those killed during the time of Prophet Muhammad were tried and convicted for treachery by an impartial Tribunal presided over by a non- Muslim .those prophecies in the Quran and hadiths never suggest a call to carryout mass killings of Jews. they only foretold what will happen towards the end of this physical world that Jews will trigger wars with all Muslims which will lead to their total destruction, not a command to kill them wherever they are found.
Georg says
“those prophecies in the Quran and hadiths . . . only foretold what will happen towards the end of this physical world that Jews will trigger wars with all Muslims which will lead to their total destruction,”
What a nice book you have. “only”, he says. You seem to be missing a crucial point (conveniently for you): The West is ashamed of its past treatment of Jews; your culture celebrates it. As an example of the attitudinal difference between the modern West and dar-al-Islam, look at Germany and their remorse over the Holocaust, with denying the Holocaust being illegal. Meanwhile, in “modern” Turkey Erdogan and you all won’t even admit to the Armenian genocide, let alone repent. The Muslim world has ZERO to teach or offer the West. It is a sickening hangover from darker times which is determined to have the world share its misery. That anyone stupid and twisted enough to mention something so ridiculous about Hitler ever got access to a keyboard is a shame on us for letting the likes of you all in here.
gravenimage says
Ibrahim itace muhammed has always–as he coyly notes–been for the Muslim genocide of the “filthy Jews”. *Ugh*.
LeftisruiningCanada says
” First, Byzantine Romans killed and expelled Jews from Palestine”
Not quite sure what you mean here – If you are referring to 70 AD and the destruction of Jerusalem, then of course there were likely no Christians involved at all. Might your obvious hatred for infidels in general be getting confused with calling them Christians?
“Muslims never carried out mass killings of Jews. Those killed during the time of Prophet Muhammad were tried and convicted for treachery by an impartial Tribunal presided over by a non- Muslim”
Sure they did. And most are still full to overflowing with hatred for Jews right now. And how much does their cup flow over! Must have missed all that stuff about the tribunal and impartial non muslim judges.
” not a command to kill them wherever they are found.”
Right, that wasn’t for Jews in particular was it…..that command is good for everyone who dissents from your vicious and ugly excuse for a faith, right?
I hope that one day soon you will realize how evil and sinful it is to attribute the koran and the life of muhammad to the God of the Bible.
gravenimage says
LeftisruiningCanada wrote, replying to Ibrahim itace muhammed:
” not a command to kill them wherever they are found.”
Right, that wasn’t for Jews in particular was it…..that command is good for everyone who dissents from your vicious and ugly excuse for a faith, right?
………………………
Spot on.
Georg says
Great points. All those marauding Christians of 70 AD.
JM says
Nasreen Khan said Jews ‘have reaped the rewards of playing victims’. That’s the pot calling the kettle black, isn’t it? Muslims as a group are not only the world’s experts on claiming victim status, but also in using their “victimhood” as a wedge to pry open a whole Pandora’s box of goodies, including – you guessed it – permission to engage rabid anti-Semitism, which they then use to justify to a global audience their eternal goal of Jewsish genocide.
The fallacy of this otherwise diabolically clever plan is evident on its face. Muslims accusing Jews of playing victims is a classic case of projection:
“…For example, a person who is habitually intolerant may constantly accuse other people of being intolerant. It incorporates blame shifting.” (source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection)
Projection also explains the apparent fear of Muslims living outside their countries of being attacked by non-Muslims. To the extent to which these Muslims are not merely feigning fear to fill the Islamophobia echo chamber, but are actually afraid of non-Muslims, it’s because they know what they themselves would do to infidels living in majority-Muslim areas. Muslims claiming that “infidels” have evil intentions toward them is pyschological projection, reflecting their own violent, twisted, and dark psyche.
Politicianphobia says
I love how I bra him uses the word filth, ha ha ha, thighing sweet, little girls is this filthy, feckless, freak`s idea of love.
duh swami says
I grew up with Hitler, in Vallejo, California… I never actually met him but h was in the news a lot…
My mother said he was a bad man,,,I never did like him much…
Jay says
If that braindead idiot gets into office, you’ll only have the voters to blame.
ronald says
Racist muslim logic – Hitler killed 6 million jews in gas chambers, so he can’t be a bad guy.
Save Europe says
Ms Khan!!! What have Muslims done good in the World????? Ummmmm oh yeah kill non Muslims constantly……