The brouhaha over President Trump’s retweets of videos depicting Muslims being violent continues in the UK, and is yet another manifestation of the general tendency to blame those who call attention to jihad atrocities rather than to focus upon the jihad atrocities themselves.
Trump himself said it best, tweeting yesterday evening:”.@Theresa_May, don’t focus on me, focus on the destructive Radical Islamic Terrorism that is taking place within the United Kingdom. We are doing just fine!”
I’m not sure we’re doing just fine, but Trump is right that the real problem is jihad terror and Sharia supremacism, and British authorities want to ignore that and shoot the messenger.
And so Chris Bryant, “a senior Labour backbencher, has written to May urging her to go further, and issue an official ban on Donald Trump from entering the UK on the grounds he is condoning fascism and his presence is ‘not conducive to the public good’, a senior Labour MP has said.”
For Chris Bryant, apparently “fascism” means “defense of Britain and its values against jihad terror.”
Bryant “cited the cases of two US far right bloggers, Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller, who were banned by May in 2013 from entering the UK to take part in English Defence League rallies, as precedents for taking action against Trump.”
Why are we “far right”? Everything we do is in defense of the freedom of speech and equality of rights of all people before the law. That’s “far right”? In any case, note well: the letter to me from the UK Home Office said that I was banned for saying that “[Islam] is a religion and is a belief system that mandates warfare against unbelievers…” That’s a demonstrably true statement. Meanwhile, Britain has a steadily lengthening record of admitting jihad preachers without a moment of hesitation. Syed Muzaffar Shah Qadri’s preaching of hatred and jihad violence was so hardline that he was banned from preaching in Pakistan, but the UK Home Office welcomed him into Britain. The UK Home Office also admitted Shaykh Hamza Sodagar into the country, despite the fact that he has said: “If there’s homosexual men, the punishment is one of five things. One – the easiest one maybe – chop their head off, that’s the easiest. Second – burn them to death. Third – throw ’em off a cliff. Fourth – tear down a wall on them so they die under that. Fifth – a combination of the above.” May’s government admitted two jihad preachers who had praised the murderer of a foe of Pakistan’s blasphemy laws. One of them was welcomed by the Archbishop of Canterbury. Meanwhile, the UK banned three bishops from areas of Iraq and Syria where Christians are persecuted from entering the country.
Chris Bryant had nothing to say about any of those jihad preachers entering Britain with no problem.
“UK ambassador conveys concerns over Trump retweet to White House,” by Rowena Mason, Guardian, November 30, 2017:
…Chris Bryant, a senior Labour backbencher, has written to May urging her to go further, and issue an official ban on Donald Trump from entering the UK on the grounds he is condoning fascism and his presence is “not conducive to the public good”, a senior Labour MP has said.
Bryant, a former Foreign Office minister, said the prime minister should issue a prohibition order against the president like those that apply to other far right figures from the US.
He cited the cases of two US far right bloggers, Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller, who were banned by May in 2013 from entering the UK to take part in English Defence League rallies, as precedents for taking action against Trump.
In a letter to May, he said: “I am writing to you to ask you and the home secretary to take immediate action to ban the president of the United States, Donald Trump, from entering the United Kingdom, due to his apparent support for far-right groups in this country.
“In retweeting Jayda Fransen’s posts, it is absolutely clear to me that President Trump is supporting and condoning fascism and far-right activity. This activity has frequently taken the form of violence on our streets. Ms Fransen herself has a long history of racism and Islamophobia, some of it criminal. Many of the people you have rightly banned from entering the UK were guilty of less than this.”…
jihad3tracker says
London mayor Sadiq Khan issued a statement calling for the President’s upcoming UK official state visit to be cancelled, and Home Secretary Amber Rudd has been quoted in an hilarious remark about “hate”, ignoring, of course, the endless hate coming from devout Muslims.
Jayell says
O, the Great Khan of London Town doth verily open his mouth and pronounce yet again – in bad English. As I recall, he threw a bit of a hissy fit when the ‘Brexit’ vote came through and actually suggested that London breaks away from the rest of the UK and stays in the EU. Isn’t that sedition? And didn’t they used to lock people up in the Tower for that before unmedically separating their heads from their bodies? As a muslim, Khan Almighty should already know about that sort of thing. And indeed it would actually be very convenient now, because The Tower of London is just across the river from City Hall, although the trip across the bridge could be perilous these days since hire vans tend drive into intrepid persons attempting the journey. But then HRH Prince Sadiq (no, he’s not King yet) would also know about that, since he tells us that this is now a legitimate part of London life since his mates love indulging in this sort of thing.
gravenimage says
Of course Khan doesn’t want any criticism of Muslims beating Europeans. That would be “Islamophobic”.
MFritz says
The truth in general has a very islamophobic bias.
John Forbes says
WELL, YOU MUST REMEMBER THE TERRIFIED RESPONSE FROM TERESA MAY LAST TIME AROUND!
THE INSTANT SPEECH ABOUT THE GREAT FAITH & ISLAM IS A RELIGION OF PEACE!
ABSOLUTELY RIDICULOUS LYING & IN OBVIOUS TERRIFIED FEAR!
YET THE % OF MUSLIMS IS LESS THAN 5%! WHAT COMES NEXT – DIAHARREAH AT EACH PRONOUNCEMENT WITH POSSIBLY A POTY PROVIDED FOR EACH EVENT ???
larry says
Folks, Its time to boycott the UK and Europe in general. Lets hit their tourism industry. Stop going there, and let them know why. F**K them.
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
Mad Devil Trump is a rascal and irresponsible not fit to be a nation leader. International community should isolate the evil United States that will lead to it total its collapse,because idiot people of the evil United States are supporting this madman in his idiocy.
mortimer says
Caliph Abu Bakr al Baghdadi, who is the ISIS chief and the caliph of the Islamic State, is apparently the first Islamic Studies PhD from a Muslim background who has no idea about Islam.
Al-Baghdadi, who has obtained BA, MA and PhD degrees in Islamic studies from the Islamic University in Baghdad, has been condemned as a person who knows nothing about Islam, and as the head of an organization that has nothing to do with Islam.
The professors from the Islamic University of Baghdad, however, do not agree. They taught the caliph and believe his credentials and doctrines are sound.
“If a person who has a PhD in Islamic studies and does nothing but study the Islamic scriptures knows nothing about Islam, then who does?” questioned al-Baghdadi’s main teacher from the Islamic University, preferring to remain anonymous since the fatwa against ISIS and its chief puts his reputation into jeopardy.
“The wine-sipping Muslims, those hedonistic adulterers will tell the world what true Islam is? Obama and Cameron know more about Islam than the faculty of Islamic studies at the Islamic University in Baghdad?” the professor bellowed with rage, while talking to a journalist.
Another professor, who had taught al-Baghdadi for his BA, said off the record that the ISIS caliph was an ardent student.
“He had this obsession with Islamic studies. I used to tell him to go out and have some fun sometimes. But his idea of fun wasn’t too human friendly,” the professor said. “In any case he was a top student. One of the best I’ve ever had. Had the entire syllabus on his finger tips – to be honest, he knew more about Islamic studies than most of the professors.”
“While you can question whether they are humans or not, there is no doubt that ISIS, including Abu Bakr (al Baghdadi), are indeed bona fide Muslims,” concluded the ISIS caliph’s PhD professor.
Mateen Elass says
Mortimer, can you share the source of these quotations? Thanks, in advance.
David Ramseur says
Everyone I know and have ever met has led lives way better than your detestable prophet. Normal people don’t adore pedophiles, torturers, genocidal warlords, etc… You worship a god who tells you that he is the greatest of deceivers! How incredibly foolish one has to be to do that. You adhere to a religion that forbids open inquiry…because it is too frail to stand up to criticism. The civilization built upon that religion is by all metrics inferior to others where life is actually able to flourish. You know this in your heart, but since you are not allowed to think, since you must do nothing but submit, you will continue to be a slave. A slave that has to conceal sin. A slave that will justify any and everything in the name of Islam. Islam cannot stand on its own. Allah needs you to protect him, like the weak little demon he is. And in the end, the true Lord (Jesus) will crush Islam, along with all of the Devil’s schemes, under his foot. If you are hungry for truth, in all its beauty, you should learn about Jesus from the gospels that Islam has tried to counterfeit. It will open your eyes and set you free.
tim gallagher says
I agree, David. Almost everyone, certainly average types of people, are far, far better people than the evil monster, Muhammad, Islam’s idea of a “perfect” man, the chosen one of Islam’s weird idea of what god is. Islam has such low, evil ideals. I also agree with you that Jesus shows us the highest of ideals, that Christianity represents high ideals for us to aim for, even if we fail to reach them. Islam is so barbaric and evil in all its aims. It should have become extinct centuries ago. It’s like some primitive, vicious religious ideology left over from mankind’s distant past.
LeftisruiningCanada says
Ibrahim, listen to this man here.
our says
David, can you go around like Martin Luther and post this to every mosque door?
carol says
Oops, sorry about this stranger ‘our’. It seems ‘carol’ has accidentally “dragged” the imposter ‘our’ into her Name box. Working on it.
carol says
Ibrahim Itace, – face it, Islam is the loose screw rattling around in the world’s cage. If you’re in a ‘safe’ country redeem your intelligence by just pushing open the cage door and exiting (we’ve attempted to follow Christian principles and left it open for those who are capable of recognizing ‘smart’ options).
All we advise is that you “leave your baggage behind” as you attempt to pass through the “Eye of the Needle”.
Westman says
Total collapse? My, but what a dreamer you are, Ibrahim. Islamic nations don’t make progress because they have made Muhammad’s Supremist Dream into their own prisons. Islam is a faith without (good) works that would subjugate all unbelievers and now subjugates half of its own Umma.
Without adopting the works of the West you would not be writing your “comments”, driving a car, using a cell phone, viewing the world, flying in an airplane, etc.
Islam only offers a worldly existence that mirrors a caged hamster running on a wire wheel. All the upgrade promises from Allah are for the next world – sadstic punishment or a heightening of flesh pleasures and glutony. I can’t imagine anything more boring and useless. Of course, there is that entertainment of watching the condemned continually burning in the fire, boiling water dumped on them, sadistic Allah giving them caustic liquids to “quench” their thirst – won’t that impact those flesh pleasures or does Islam so totally revise conscience that observing suffering is a pleasure?
By all means, Ibrahim, isolate the US and bring about another uniting of the populace in one of the few nations having the resources, available land, a technical and scientific engine, and the available energy to function at its current level for 200 years.
The US is still a sleeping giant with far too many seditionists who need a real national cause and will segway when it comes. Please, bring it on, Ibrahim.
kabooooooooooooooooooooom says
Excellent Westman! I doubt the goat-shagger will comprehend even 10% of your logic.
gravenimage says
Ibrahim itace muhammed wrote:
Mad Devil Trump is a rascal and irresponsible not fit to be a nation leader.
………………………………
In other words, how *dare* he say anything critical about Muslims brutalizing Infidels? Doesn’t he know this is the natural state of things?
More:
International community should isolate the evil United States
………………………………
Ibrahim itace muhammed wants dhimmis to enforce the Shari’ah ban on saying anything negative about the violence of Islam, just like in Muslim countries.
If he could have President Trump executed for “Blasphemy”, that would make him happy.
More:
that will lead to it total its collapse,because idiot people of the evil United States are supporting this madman in his idiocy.
………………………………
Has Ibrahim itace muhammed forgotten that he said that the United States was on the brink of fiscal collapse because we had not embraced “Shar5i’ah Finance”, and as a result could not hope to have an economy as robust as that of Turkey or Iran?
And yet, our economy is booming, and is the strongest in the world.
What else might this Mohammedan be wrong about? Nothing that he will notice.
LeftisruiningCanada says
” International community should isolate the evil United States that will lead to it total its collapse”
Yes, isolating the United States will cause the collapse of the international community, i agree.
MFritz says
Don’t feed the troll! Soros pays to provoke.
Joe says
It is good that the Devil is mad. That means that Islam is losing. Free speech shows that Islam is for losers. You need to accept Jesus Christ as your personal savior. You don’t have much time.
Emilie Green says
Theresa May and all the other left-wing UK officials are condemning what?
Muslims behaving as instructed in their holy books and by the example of Mohammad,
or,
That Trump, acting as a modern day Paul Revere (as Robert does), is exposing normative Muslim behavior?
Emilie Green says
Whether Europeans know it or not, Islam is their future,
http://www.pewforum.org/2017/11/29/europes-growing-muslim-population/
Europe’s Growing Muslim Population: Muslims are projected to increase as a share of Europe’s population – even with no future migration
Jaladhi says
Yup, Sweden will be 1/3 Islamic by 2050 even if migration stops now.
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/11/30/pew-sweden/
Basically same story as you say in the above link.
Joe says
May and other European leaders think they have the right, even the duty, of controlling how people in their countries think. In their mind, people should not be allowed to think for themselves. Anyone who says something they don’t like is banned, because she is sure that her constituents are idiots.
Benedict says
The disintegration and the defeat of the British Empire will soon be completed. Choosing jihadies to president Trump will be the nail in the coffin.
Jaladhi says
Culmination of Brit love affair with Muslims!! Ha, ha… chickens coming home to roost!
gravenimage says
I’m not sure why you re cheering over the prospect of a fully Islamized Britain, Jaladhi.
Jaladhi says
I am not “cheering” the prospect of Britain becoming Islamic.Just telling the truth so that Brits can open their eyes about Islam!! I am disgusted at the thought of their stupidity that they cannot see what they are doing. Are they blind and deaf and stupid or everything combined. Just see what was Brit PM”s response to Trump’s retweeting of Islamic terrorism which confirms what I am saying about them. Moronic!
If that is how they are choosing to behave, they will become Islamic just like the Europeans. They are a lost cause. Canada is also on the way to the religion of their darling Muslims. It remains to be seen what happens in US – anybody such as Robert Spencer who tells the truth about Islam is immediately declared Islamophobe instead of looking for the truth about Islam. Signs are not good gravenimage!!
LeftisruiningCanada says
We’d all better hope Canada does not succumb.
That’s one heck of long border the US would have to secure if we did.
gravenimage says
I agree that things are dire in Britain right now, Jaladhi.
Benedict says
J: When a Metropolis like London elects a Muslim Mayor, I also don’t know whether to laugh or cry. You choose to laugh and I will laugh with you. If anyone chooses to cry, I will cry with her or him. It’s this kind of political naivety and credulity that brought Hitler to power.
Michael Copeland says
Theresa May, as Home Secretary, was wrong in her statement of UK law.
She accused Spencer and Geller of “making statements that MAY foster hatred… ” (my emphasis) – a category that is everlastingly extendable.
There is no “may” in the UK law. The prohibition is on “statements which foster hatred”.
See “What is meant by “unacceptable behaviour”, Daily Telegraph
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1496902/What-is-meant-by-unacceptable-behaviour.html
Jim says
Jesus himself made “statements which foster hatred”. Lies hate truth.
LeftisruiningCanada says
That’s true, hence street evangelists are often arrested in the formerly Great Britain.
carol says
Makes a certain kind of sense: tug at the leash of the good pup so that the shaggy hound doesn’t freak out.
Bob Smyth says
“And so Chris Bryant, “a senior Labour backbencher, has written to May urging her to go further, and issue an official ban on Donald Trump from entering the UK on the grounds he is condoning fascism and his presence is ‘not conducive to the public good’, a senior Labour MP has said.”
One wonders how all of the “hate preachers” that have been allowed to enter the UK, DON’T fall into the category of ‘not conducive to the public good’?
gravenimage says
Moronic MP Chris Bryant is pretty sanguine about Jihad terror attacks:
“London terror attack: Labour MPs claim a deadly strike against Britain was ‘Expected'”
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/782783/London-terror-attack-westminster-hilary-benn-chris-bryant-houses-of-parliament
Michael Copeland says
In signalling his virtue, Chris Bryant, “senior Labour backbencher”, exposes his ignorance of Islam.
These days, that is negligence.
RichardL says
I hope they ban Trump! Than the islamisation of Britain would become very, very obvious. That would be a huge win for Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller!
Westman says
I agree with the sentiment although it will never happen.
The UK needs trading partners other than the EU which has begun its decline under the decisions of Jean-Claude Juncker and Angela Merkel. Instead of, “Yes, we can!”, in the future it will be, “What were we thinking!”
gravenimage says
Banning the American president is so outrageous–I’m not sure if this would wake ordinary Britons up, or just soften them up for even more suicidal insanity.
RichardL says
you might be right. Every time I think it can’t get worse, it does.
carol says
Trump’s response should certainly wake up the politicians! The man is such a treat!
rbla says
Learn from Alinsky. The left always uses descriptions such as “far right”. Do the same e.g. “Anti-Semitic MP criticizes Trump”.
Jim says
or “pro ISIS MP”.
Custos Custodum says
It appears that Chris Bryant has never been registered as a pedophile sex offender.
LeftisruiningCanada says
Ha, exactly, you got it.
“There are however unconfirmed speculations that…….”
mummymovie says
They can kiss all the muz butt they want to, but it’ll never save them.
Jim says
Someday, Robert, we will be vindicated. It will come because “the truth will out”, and the light will shine in to the darkness. It may not be in my lifetime, but it will come. It has to, because we are telling the truth. Sometime the Zeitgeist will accept it.
Guest says
You know I would love to see what would happen if the UK banned our President. Imagine what that would look like
gravenimage says
A lot of moron’s in Blue states would applaud such craziness, and consider it to reflect badly on the president rather than on Britian.
mummymovie says
She’s right.
The lefty neverTrump morons and the Enemedia would have a heyday with that, and exploit it as grounds for impeachment.., or something.
Voytek Gagalka says
“…issue an official ban on Donald Trump from entering the UK.”
Liberal morons. Why bother with banning Donald Trump? Rupture of diplomatic relations is the only proper form in world of diplomacy and foreign relations. Or rapture and war (direct military confrontation). They can “ban” common foreigners, as they have proven they are capable to do, but they cannot ban elected foreign representatives of “friendly” countries with which Britain still holds diplomatic relations! And that Labour party member, a party which potentially can become governing party, does not grasp that simple fact? Are they kids from grade one or what?
gravenimage says
Oh, I’m sure they could do it. It is just undemocratic and incredibly stupid–but that did not stop the banning of Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller, and may not stop this, either.
Rouge1 says
It’s nice to know who your real enemies are. Do it.
gravenimage says
UK: Labour MP cites ban of Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller in calling for Trump to be banned from the country
……………………………….
In other wo0rds, Britain has already crushed freedom of speech by barring peaceful people who oppose violent Jihad; let’s do it again–and this time, with the president of the country that is our greatest ally.
And note the claim that opposing Muslims brutalizing Europeans is “Fascist”.
And when did supporting Muslims victimizing Britons become a British value?
GUEST says
“,,,general tendency to blame those who call attention to jihad atrocities rather than to focus upon the jihad atrocities themselves” – Substitute with: “,,,general tendency to blame those (women) who called attention to sexual harassment atrocities rather than to focus upon the atrocities themselves, and go after the perpetrators.” – Sound familiar? ALL those women who were abused over the years, some raped, and finally they’re being listened to. Muslims are conquering Europe and the world without firing a shot and laughing all the way to the welfare office.
LeftisruiningCanada says
“Trump himself said it best, tweeting yesterday evening:”.@Theresa_May, don’t focus on me, focus on the destructive Radical Islamic Terrorism that is taking place within the United Kingdom. We are doing just fine!”
I’ve always liked Mr Trump, ever since i found out how badly the CBC here in Canada lie about him, when actually he says mostly agreeable things.
However, the tweet quoted above has earned him even more respect from me. It is definitely a sign of the times when such clear minded statements are a rarity from high profile leaders in the west, but Trump nailed it with this one.
And they know it.
Flavius Claudius Iulianus says
Trump is the first President in a long time that doesn’t talk like a politician; he talks like the people he represents and serves.
carol says
Such style!…”and now back to the subject at hand…”
LeftisruiningCanada says
Yeah, quite a good way to both turn the attention back where it belongs (on the violence) AND a not so subtle jab at the personality driven media, who for the most part wouldn’t discuss an idea if it stabbed them in the face.
His raising to international attention Jayda Frensen is so interesting. There’s a chance Mr Trump doesn’t know what she says in her speeches, but i’m not willing to underestimate the President. He’s shown time after time how smart he is in guiding news cycles and dominating the media in general with minimal input. The media know this of course, and so set about trying to get everyone thinking he’s a bumpkin…..
Keep it up Mr Trump 🙂
Flavius Claudius Iulianus says
The banning of Trump from the UK would be a big boon for the fight against the hijrah. It would put the spotlight on how the UK is owned by big middle eastern oil money and the UK’s present leadership is complicit in the stealth implementation of sharia on the UK. A lot of people would clue-in that something is not right there.
carol says
We keep kicking the almost helpless prisoners of that island in the pants. Isn’t it oil and drug money etc. that flow through the three city-states controlled by Rothschilds etc. that largely call the shots worldwide?
Joe says
This is becoming funny. Instead of banning the root of the cause. Muslims. They ban everybody who points to the root of the cause.
MFritz says
Just don’t visit that country, Donald. Let them have their civil war first.
John Forbes says
This is a typical leftist reaction to any opinion that differs from the leftist’s agenda!
WHAT I LIKE ABOUT THIS ONE IS THAT IT OPENS THE BOX ON THE PROBLEMS & SETS A PRECEDENT FOR CONFLICT!
THE WEST HAS TO CONFRONT ISLAM ANYWAY & SOONER IS BETTER THAN LATER!
I wonder about leftists says
Ibrahim, it would be good for you to learn a bit about Christianity, which was the last “closing religion” of all religions. Strength, does not lay in violence, killing, conquering, raping, tell everybody what to do, how, and when. It lays in total different things, of which your prophet never heard of. And it must be really scary for you and Islam, because it is only built on violence and can not hold and can crumble so easily, no matter how you try with all your violence, and Ibrahim, if you hate the idiotic and evil people from the USA so much, why are you there in the first place, you never had it so good. If you have all this hate, then don’t profit from all those evil people, their money must be bad then too and all other things. Grow up.
The time of conquering is over, for everybody, time is changing very fast, you have no idea Ibrahim what is laying ahead for you and all of us.
Bad Juju says
Robert, don’t take anything the Leftists say at face value. They have an agenda, a somewhat hidden agenda. They are not engaged in honest rational discussion, they are herding sheep. They place no value in facts and reality and logic. They are religious fanatics defending their faith, by any means necessary. And their religion is called Marxism, or Communism, or the one world Globalist government… or another utopian supremacist ideology which name may not be spoken. Dignifying anything they say with a presumption of sincerity is to fall into their trap. Expecting them to be moved by rational argument is futile. Calling out the meta-game they are playing is they only way to defeat them, and shining a bright light on their real agenda is not easy. Getting their prospective victims to see what you see is even harder.
There are examples of the game the British and EU leaders are playing throughout history. Churchill alluded to one example when he said “Russia is a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma.” Sun Tzu explained the technique in “The Art of War” and Viktor Suvorov finally documented at least some of the truth in another case in his book “Icebreaker: Who Started WWII”.
martin says
What used to be known as the labour party is now effectively the communist and islamonazi alliance party
Bad Juju says
Don’t take anything the Leftists say at face value. They have an agenda, a somewhat hidden agenda. They are not engaged in honest rational discussion, they are herding sheep. They place no value in facts and reality and logic. They are religious fanatics defending their faith, by any means necessary. And their religion is called Marxism, or Communism, or the one world Globalist government… or another utopian supremacist ideology which name may not be spoken. Dignifying anything they say with a presumption of sincerity is to fall into their trap. Expecting them to be moved by rational argument is futile. Calling out the meta-game they are playing is the only way to defeat them, and shining a bright light on their real agenda is not easy. Getting their prospective victims to see what you see is even harder.
There are examples of the game the British and EU leaders are playing throughout history. Churchill alluded to one example when he said “Russia is a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma.” Sun Tzu explained the technique in “The Art of War” and Viktor Suvorov finally documented at least some of the truth in another case in his book “Icebreaker: Who Started WWII”.
Warren says
Most Labour MPs are morons anyway, they are the terrorists if they support Islam. The U.K. will learn the hard way, the people have to stand up and fight when the time comes, our lives will depend on it. The politicians are pretending all is well, however we are at war with Islam. By the way Bryant loves Islam so much, if Islam took control he would be a dead man for being gay. You see how stupid this man truly is, he needs to study the Koran and Hadith.
Gerry Vincent says
Do some reading about this islamist tool Chris Bryant. A supposed vicar of the Church of England he was ridiculed in the press in 2003 for seeking anonymous sexual encounters on the homosexual dating site “Gaydar” posting photos of himself clothed only in his underwear. He has also been embroiled in a parliamentary expenses scandal.
He doesn’t seem to understand that when the muzzles take over and are ruling the U.K. people like him will be thrown off rooftops to please “allah”.
tgusa says
Robert, Pamela and our President are some of our great leaders right now. The fool should be much more concerned with the hundred million plus Americans that are not yet and may never be considered leadership. Those Americans have about as much use for this fool and his allies as they would Benedict Arnold
Rich says
The Alt-Right is Not Right – It’s Left…..The alt-right is myth
One of the pillars of conservatism is “The Golden Rule,” which automatically precludes white nationalism or racial supremacy of any kind.
According to McPaper, the white nationalist/supremacist Richard Spencer coined the term in 2008. If he uses the term alt-right to identify himself and his fellow believers – this begs a question?
Was President Woodrow Wilson a member of the alt-right? He was a racist white supremacist.
So were President Lyndon Johnson and the late Democrat Senator Robert Byrd.
Margaret Sanger founded Planned Parenthood to halt the spread of the black race. I’d call that white supremacism.
The KKK was the enforcers of the white supremacist Southern Democrat Party, the Dixiecrats.
Alt-right demonstrators hit the streets adorned with Nazi paraphernalia and Confederate flags.
Neither of those symbols represents American conservatism.
In fact, the rise of Hitler and the Nazi Party, which these nuts appear to be so fond of, was a tale of combat between two competing leftist ideologies – fascism and communism.
Neither faction incidentally resembled conservatism or what we’ve come to know as “the right.”
The German KPD was the largest communist party outside the Soviet Union during the 1920s.
It was the Trotsky-inspired KPD or German Communist Party vs. the Hitler led fascist “National Socialist German Workers Party” (Nazis).
There were no “right-wingers” involved at all.
And did I see the word socialist?
By cracky, I did.
I don’t know of anyone who would confuse conservatism with socialism.
The alt-right is myth.
It’s a name crafted to confuse the public into thinking these loons were spawned out of the conservative movement.
It should actually be relabeled, or labeled properly as the National Socialist American Party, because they are in fact fascists – not of the right and certainly not conservative.
But because of our woefully inept education system in this country, most believe fascism and Hitler were right wing.
They couldn’t be more wrong.
The fascists were leftists who had/have a lot more in common with communists than with free market conservative capitalists.
The major difference between fascists and communists is that the former is nationalistic and the latter, internationalistic.
http://freedomoutpost.com/alt-right-not-right-left/
LeftisruiningCanada says
That is an important difference and no doubt, but would you not say rather that the major difference is more fundamental than that?
Fascist ideas originate from a very different place than do socialist ideas. The latter was a rational response against capitalism and the enlightenment ideas that support it, while the former was decidedly irrational, and opposed both capitalism and the socialism that reacted against it by rejecting the very ground they stood on. That seems to be a ‘more major’ difference, if i might say so.
Not a big deal, just thought what you said was interesting.