Nearly 120,000 foreign nationals have been allowed to enter the United States since 2005 despite coming….from the three countries that the State Department recognizes as state-sponsors of terrorism: Iran, Syria, and Sudan.
It happened through “chain migration,” by which “new immigrants can bring an unlimited amount of foreign family members with them to the U.S.” Add to that number 140,000 nationals from Bangladesh, which is the fourth largest Muslim country in the world by population (after Indonesia, Pakistan and India). As noted in the article below, Akayed Ullah, the perpetrator of the “botched ISIS-inspired terrorist attack in New York City this week,” is a Bangladeshi national.
Trump has stated that he plans to end “chain migration” as a threat to national security, and instead implement a long overdue merit-based system. Of course, there are those who will again accuse Trump of being “racist” in his determination to protect all Americans. It is worthwhile to note that Trump did not first raise the topic of ending chain migration because of the NYC incident. He raised it in the first week of November as part of a DACA deal.
Now Trump must also come up with a plan on how to deal with American Islamic State jihadis who are unaccounted for in the midst of valid fears about their return from Iraq and Syria.
“Chain Migration Imported 120K Foreign Nationals from Terrorist-Funding Countries Since 2005”, by John Binder, Breitbart, December 13, 2017:
Nearly 120,000 foreign nationals have been allowed to enter the United States since 2005 despite coming from countries designated as state-sponsors of terrorism.
Previously unreleased data from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) reveals the scale to which foreign relatives of immigrants in the U.S. have been able to mass immigrate to the country over the last few decades. This process is known as “chain migration,” whereby new immigrants can bring an unlimited amount of foreign family members with them to the U.S.
In total, chain migration has imported more than 117,000 foreign nationals from the three countries that the State Department recognizes as state-sponors of terrorism: Iran, Syria, and Sudan.
Though not being a state-sponsor of terrorism, Bangladesh has been able to send more than 140,000 foreign nationals to the U.S. since 2005 due to chain migration, Breitbart News reported.
This data was released to Breitbart News following a botched ISIS-inspired terrorist attack in New York City this week where 27-year-old Akayed Ullah, a Bangladesh national, allegedly attempted to detonate a suicide bomb.
8,508 Bangladeshi nationals entered in 2005
9,936 entered in 2006
7,765 entered in 2007
7,795 entered in 2008
12,974 entered in 2009
11,407 entered in 2010
13,136 entered in 2011
13,379 entered in 2012
11,346 entered in 2013
14,170 entered in 2014
13,034 entered in 2015
18,051 entered in 2016
Since 2005, 141,501 Bangladeshi nationals have entered U.S. as chain migrantsTerrorist-sanctioned countries have also sent nearly 30,000 foreign nationals to the U.S. since 2007 via the Diversity Visa Lottery program that was championed by Sen. Ted Kennedy and Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Breitbart News reported.
Under the Visa Lottery, the U.S. randomly gives out 50,000 visas every year to foreign nationals from a multitude of countries, including those with known terrorism problems, such as Iran, Syria and Sudan.
The U.S. has brought in nearly 21,000 Iranian nationals, 2,732 Sudanese nationals and 812 Syrian nationals on the Visa Lottery — not counting subsequent chain-migration of additional unscreened people from those countries — even though all three countries are listed as state-sponsors of terrorism.
In total, about 9.3 million foreign nationals have entered the U.S. since 2005 because of chain migration, making it the largest driver of legal immigration to the country.
As Breitbart News reported, chain migration makes up more than 70 percent of all legal immigration — with every two new immigrants bringing seven foreign relatives with them.
Currently, only one in 15 foreign nationals admitted to the U.S. come to the country based on skills and employment purposes. Though roughly 150,000 employment-based Green Cards are allotted every year, half of those Green Cards actually go to the foreign relatives of employees.
In the last decade, 1.7 million chain migrants have entered the country from Mexico, with the average Mexican immigrant bringing roughly six foreign relatives with them to the U.S. Mexico sends more chain migrants to the U.S. than any other country.
Despite President Trump and Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ calls for chain migration to be immediately ended by the Republican-controlled Congress, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and House Speaker Paul Ryan have yet to champion the initiative……
Tim says
The numbers are staggering. Think of all the terrorists entering the U.S. McConnell and Ryan might not have the theological knowledge to know what to do. Because of this lacking Islamophobia wins.
Jaladhi says
Send them all back. They have not come here to live peacefully and improve their life and contribute to USA. Their only mission in life is to convert us by any means – terror included to achieve their aim. Period. They don’t deserve to be here!
mummymovie says
What is this? The United States of Bangla-f*ckin-desh?!?
And why was Somalia not mentioned in the article? Many cities across America in the last three years have quickly come to resemble Mogadishu.
McConnell and Ryan are chickensh*t pols; we all know that. But I have been surprised at how many Senate Republicans (a majority, in fact) are in lock-step with the rest of congress in enabling mode with the unbridled importation of islam to the U.S.. It has become obvious that we cannot count on those primadonnas to stick their necks out for anything, for fear of having to go out and get real jobs. Government corruption is thick as gravy.
The “refugee” resettlement industry is taxpayer-funded and very profitable for those running it, but wow, if those stats are true, chain migration is the worst of the worst of the whole rotten-to-the-core islam importation industry.
*On that note: Don’t forget to boycott Chobani.
And will someone explain to me why we have to allow returning IS fighter scumbags to re-enter our country without immediate imprisonment? Sure, I get pinko liberal countries like Sweden and France letting them back in and kissing their asses; that’s to be expected. But why do we have to do it here?
I am in the dark as to why we are powerless to detain and charge them upon re-entry… or just re-route them to Guantanamo Bay.
Also, I’ve been following this story on various news outlets:
http://taskandpurpose.com/raqqa-isis-fighters-secret-deal/
What happened to “They will die on the battlefield where they are”.rather than come home?
gravenimage says
Chain migration imported 120,000 foreign nationals from terrorist-funding countries since 2005
………………….
The size of a small city–about the population of Topeka, Kansas, Hartford, Connecticut, or Fargo, North Dakota.
What could possibly go wrong?
Kepha says
I’m all for rounding up and deporting people who come to the USA to do us ill, but I won’t knock “chain migration”.
We hear a lot about illegal immigration from Latin America, and I agree it’s a problem. But a very large number of the ESOL students I teach are here legally, and often because many years ago, an uncle or aunt became a US citizen and petitioned for the siblings (the USA is one of the few countries that allows this); and my students immigrated as minor children of the principal beneficiaries. The extended family support systems (homes; employment entry for parents; etc.) are a stabilizing factor for people who are not well-off, and it often shows in student readiness for school and learning aptitude.
Uncle Kepha’s own wife and daughter-in–law immigrated legally.
One of my brothers-in-law and his wife are skills-based immigrants.
I go to church with plenty of people who immigrated legally as parents, siblings, and children of naturalized anchors who may have come here originally as “brain drain” immigrants (temporary worker to skills-based immigrant).
I work with a number of legal immigrant colleagues, some of whom are beneficiaries of “chain migration”. They are contributors to their new country, and I am happy to work with them. And some may represent a hope for the re-Christianization of our country.
Getting back to my legal Latin American students, don’t tell me that they never learn English. The “primos and primas” born to the anchor in our country are native English speakers. If you offer the parents who don’t know English subsidized English lessons after hours, you’ll have a “YUUUUGE” line of takers. I also wish I had a fiver for every group of my students whom I’ve heard code-switching (using both first and second language in conversation).
I wish I had a fiver for every legal immigrant who has no problem with new neighbors of another color and native language, respects our political and cultural traditions, and who really wants to fit in in our country. I’d retire quite comfortably.
Sure, let’s enforce the laws we have on the books. Let’s deport other countries’ problems that got exported to us. But, by all means, let’s keep what’s good and functional in our immigration system.
The problem isn’t “chain migration” per se, but lack of enforcement in other areas of immigration laws.
Cheer Bear Girl says
This was happening under Bush’s watch. Shame on Bush and Obama for letting these monsters in our land.