Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has often advertised that in Canada, “diversity is our strength”; meanwhile, “the Liberal policy requires employers sign an attestation that their core mandate respects human rights and the values underlying the Charter, including reproductive rights and the right to be free from discrimination on the basis of, among other things, sexual orientation and gender identity or expression.”
Trudeau is also a big promoter of LGBTQ rights in Canada and abroad, but there is a big discrepancy apparent in Trudeau’s thinking, since he also “embraces and promotes” the Islamic supremacist movement and vision in Canada, “which views homosexuality as a crime punishable by lashing and even death.”
Trudeau even passionately advocates the welcoming-home of Islamic State fighters who throw homosexuals head first from rooftops.
One wonders how Trudeau intends to reconcile his views of diversity with Islamic doctrine, preached openly in this video….
“LGBTQ – The Islamic Perspective – Canada”, by By Rachel Ehrenfeld, American Center for Democracy, January 19, 2018:
Canadian Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau touts himself as a leader who equality and rights for the LGBTQ community. At the same time, he also embraces and promotes the growing Islamist movement in Canada, which views homosexuality as a crime punishable by lashing and even death. And the Islamists make no secret of their views. They promote them in mosques, public lecturers, articles and books often distributed free in bookstores and on city street corners.
In November 2016, Trudeau has appointed a special advisor to develop and coordinate the Canadian government’s LGBTQ agenda within and without Canada. Trudeau’s government is also “funding and implementing LGBTQ-related projects abroad supporting violence-prevention programs, awareness-raising campaigns and advocacy efforts, including initiatives aimed to combat homophobia and transphobia in education systems.” Trudeau has spoken of the “great strides in securing legal rights for the LGBTQ community in Canada. But the fight to end discrimination is not over and a lot of hard work still needs to be done. Canadians know our country is made stronger because of our diversity, not in spite of it.”
Yet, Canada, which prides itself of draconian “hate speech” laws, allows major Muslim organizations, imams preaching in mosques, open lectures, books, videos and on social media, the notion that “The Hadd [fixed punishment] of homosexuality is stoning to death. The methods of killing them (the two who committed the homosexual act) that have been related from the Companions have differed. From among them, there were those who burned them with fire. Others among them killed them by stoning them with stones. Ibn ‘Abbas said about them. “The highest building in the village should be sought, then they should be thrown from it upside down (i.e. on their heads). Then they should be stoned after that.” Excerpts from the book Minhaj-Al-Muslim by Abu Bakr Al-Jazairy (purchased at the Islamic Circle of North America’s bookstore in Toronto).
These are no different attitudes than those of the Salafis, such as Da’esh (ISIS), the Muslim Brotherhood’s affiliate, Hamas, and the mullahs in Iran…
Indiana Tom says
Judeo Christianity is not a big proponent of LGBT life styles either.
And if a man lie with mankind, as with womankind, both of them have committed abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them. Leviticus 20:13
For this cause God gave them up unto vile passions: for their women changed the natural use into that which is against nature: and likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another, men with men working unseemliness, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was due. Romans 1:26
Wyldeirishman says
This is truth.
However, we are not given anything even remotely close to a scriptural mandate for disassociating with them (let alne throwing them from the rooftops). If you’re going to utilize the words of St. Paul from his Roman epistle, do note that the remainder of the passage that you quote (and on into the subsequent chapter) springs a trap that duly convicts all of humanity, regardless of the flavor of the offense.
Loving someone doesn’t include a mandate for loving everything that they are. The cross is and remains the great equalizer. 🙂
Indiana Tom says
On an absolute scale….as it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one;
But we do have the be not yoked with unbelievers crowd….
Be not unequally yoked with unbelievers: for what fellowship have righteousness and iniquity? or what communion hath light with darkness? And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what portion hath a believer with an unbeliever?
Of course this gets used for closed communion quite a bit.
Carolyne says
The following is a true story–one of those involved is a relative.
Four young men decided to start a company together–something to do with computers. One day, one of the four told the other three he could not be “Yoked” with them and left the company. The other three made the company a success and recently sold it for 30 million $.to a Japanese firm. The “Unyoked”: one is struggling along. The yoke is on him. One of those who stayed with the company is my nephew.
I do not believe that humans are all bad. I hate that song “That saved a wretch like me.” I am not a wretch and never was. Be a wretch if you want to be. I don’t and am not.
IMO if a person wants to be gay its none of my business. I have no control on the behavior of others nor do I wish to have.
And if “Righteous” means following the supernatural like sheep count me out.
Kepha says
That is why you need to read further in Paul’s epistles and see how we are acceptable to God through Christ’s sacrifice of himself on the cross and resurrection from the dead, received by faith.
And since you quote ROmans 1, you might note as well that it is hard on the implaccable and unmerciful, haters of parents, envious, deceitful, etc.
LeftisruiningCanada says
Carolyne, your story is interesting, but tells us very little.
Why exactly did the one leave the others? Was he a Christian? Did you ask him why he left?
Financial gains are not something that Christians have tended to see as a trustworthy confirmation of God’s favor.
“I hate that song “That saved a wretch like me.” I am not a wretch and never was. Be a wretch if you want to be. I don’t and am not. ”
But you are Carolyne, just like everyone else. If you’ve ever lied or stolen or whatever, you are indeed a wretch.
“IMO if a person wants to be gay its none of my business. I have no control on the behavior of others nor do I wish to have. ”
I would agree, other than to say that Christians do feel responsible to try and let all sinners know that without Christ, they are in danger of the judgment.
Do not mistake disagreement with a desire to coerce and control.
“And if “Righteous” means following the supernatural like sheep count me out.”
No, Righteous means being found in Christ. The idea that believing that some things are wrong while others are right makes Christians followers of “the supernatural like sheep” is very interesting.
LeftisruiningCanada says
It should be understood that, from the Christian perspective, the laws and punishments for various sins in the OT are seen as examples of the Lord’s strict requirements of purity in thought and action.
For Christians, while we agree that death is the rightful punishment for ALL sin, we have no desire or commandment to go about killing people. Christ died to take that punishment so that all those who believe in Him don’t have to be judged guilty and deserving of death themselves.
It’s ok if anyone wants to deny the possibility of ultimate judgment and the associated removal of Sin from the world, but for us Christians it a fact. It will happen.
For someone to avoid being found guilty in the Judgment is one of the main reasons Christians are motivated to tell people about Christ’s sacrifice.
Incidentally, it is not ‘hate’ that leads Christians to be against the open and gleeful acceptance of homosexuality, but loving concern for them.
Both with regards to this life and the next, in the end being unable to define same-sex attraction is wrong only harms those who are experiencing same-sex attraction.
Ren Ostertag says
The LGBT agenda – on this point I am in agreement (and so is my family) with the opinion of most Muslims. In most other areas I am not.
LeftisruiningCanada says
I can only agree with the assesment by islam that homosexuality is morally wrong. Everything else they have to say about it is not acceptable.
gravenimage says
Ren Ostertag wrote:
The LGBT agenda – on this point I am in agreement (and so is my family) with the opinion of most Muslims. In most other areas I am not.
……………………
Wait–you believe that gay people should be thrown off tall buildings and stoned to death? *Ugh*.
Andy says
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4mBnQh8Ums
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=auYAeeuydbA
Andy says
Rise Canada brings 100 Chinese/Asians to rally vs
#HijabHoaxhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9y-vbzN6qek
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cm10MuLRI34
Johan Elzinga says
Really?? Are we as viewers from this website now starting to use ancient texts to justify stoning and killing people because it is in some book? How is freedom of speech able to justify stoning people?
I am well aware that the old testament (the Christian bible) advocates many, many bloody punishments and killings. In that respect it is nothing better than the islam or those bloody Hadith books. The only difference is that modern Christians do not practice this and do not read this vile literature (at least, most of them don’t).
Christianity as well boils down to some superstitious belief, some primitive belief that justified the killing of many thousands of women on behalf of the Catholic inquisition, torturing them and burning them as witches. Modern priests have abused children by the thousands, this all came out in the open in the last decades.
Let’s face it folks, the Christian church has been just as barbaric as the current islamists. The catholic church used to be a really barbaric institute and really did not change enough. It is not long ago – not even a few hundred years – that christians were killing jews by the hundred thousands. A few centuries before there were the pogroms in Germany and in Poland. Forgotten? Now that’s convenient!! A very nice quote that I picked from the internet: Morality is doing the right thing because you think it is right, disregarding what you are told. Believing is doing whatever you are told regardless whether you think it is right. When oh when oh when will we all start burning bibles instead of cutting each other’s throat because of some superstition and books that are proven completely misguided, every page of them, by modern science. Scientists were burned by the church. Now we have internet but it does not seem to get any better, superstition and idiotic religious ideas are rampant. With those idiotic religions as of today we are more primitive than the monkeys we descended from. All our technology does not change that. That is my belief.
LeftisruiningCanada says
Because no atheistic belief system ever killed people.
Save Europe says
I’m an atheist and deplore what the asinine plonker, wrote above. I’d prefer you’d label him as a Leftarded Cultural Marxist. That is what he certainly is.
StellaSaidSo says
The crimes of the communist regimes of the 20thC were committed in the name of communism, not in the name of atheism. The antipathy to religion on the part of communists derives from the political imperative of removing competing ideologies, not from lack of belief in gods. While the majority of communists may indeed be atheists (Pope Francis and his chums being obvious exceptions), it is a mistake to assume – as many Christians seem to do – that most atheists are communists. Atheism is nothing more than the absence of belief in gods, and does not imply adherence to any particular political ideology or body of opinion on any matter whatsoever.
LeftisruiningCanada says
I was just commenting on the first posters idea that ‘religion’ was the cause of all the worlds problems.
While not all atheists are communists, there’s a high probability that all communists are atheists.
gravenimage says
Agreed, Save Europe and Stella.
Indiana Tom says
Christianity as well boils down to some superstitious belief, some primitive belief that justified the killing of many thousands of women on behalf of the Catholic inquisition, torturing them and burning them as witches. Modern priests have abused children by the thousands, this all came out in the open in the last decades.
Let’s face it folks, the Christian church has been just as barbaric as the current islamists.
The big difference between Christianity and Islam is that Islam condones the barbarous acts and Christianity of the New Testament really does not.
What then is the law? It was added because of transgressions, until the seed should come to whom the promise has been made. It was ordained through angels by the hand of a mediator. Now a mediator is not between one, but God is one. Is the law then against the promises of God? Certainly not! For if there had been a law given which could make alive, most certainly righteousness would have been of the law. But the Scriptures imprisoned all things under sin, that the promise by faith in Jesus Christ might be given to those who believe.
But before faith came, we were kept in custody under the law, confined for the faith which should afterwards be revealed. So that the law has become our tutor to bring us to Christ, that we might be justified by faith. But now that faith has come, we are no longer under a tutor. Galatians 3:19
LeftisruiningCanada says
Humans have been barbaric under the banner of Christ, as we have under every other banner, or not banner at all.
As you rightly note, Christ and Christianity could not be clearer in opposing human barbarity, while islam has an unalterably perfect example of barbarity which all muslims strive to emulate as their knowledge of him permits.
Save Europe says
We are currently in 2018! There are no Christians blowing themselves up, en masse, in the name of Jesus, or God.
gravenimage says
+1
Kepha says
+100, save Europe.
Nice semantic quibble someone made above how the barbarities of the 20th century were made in the name of Communism rather than atheism.
In fact, knowing something about Communism, such barbarities were made in the names of social justice, scientific progress, eradicating ignorance and superstition, equality, liberation, national pride…Erich Mielke, the guy who gave the Stasi the order to shoot to kill anyone trying to leave the German Democratic Republic, said he did so because he was a humanist.
StellaSaidSo says
Not a ‘semantic quibble’ at all, but a matter of historical record.
Just because the facts don’t fit your narrative does not mean that they aren’t facts..
LeftisruiningCanada says
Exactly Kepha, they were convinced that their ‘cleaning house’ would be of ultimate benefit to the ‘community’. The ‘individual’, what’s that?
Carol says
Johan…you make sense. If we stopped to really think we might ask “Who is more entitled to the honorific title “human being”? – those who go charging about browbeating, brainwashing, and killing in the name of religion and pompous piety, or those who are merely guilty of having and following urges others may find somewhat unusual and distasteful BUT who do not go charging about browbeating, brainwashing, and killing?? History seems to prove that we’d all be a great deal safer with more of the latter and fewer of the form.
Objective research reveals that the world has many shades of grey and so we should not presume to condemn or wipe out that which merely makes us feel discomfited.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_animals_displaying_homosexual_behavior
LeftisruiningCanada says
For a Christian, the fact that some homosexual behavior can be seen in animals simply confirms the Biblical idea that all of Creation is indeed fallen and sinful.
Carol says
If we humbly follow some great earthly prophet/leader will that ensure that there’s hope and redemption for us? I sure hope we don’t have to buckle under five times a day and bang our heads on the floor!
LeftisruiningCanada says
I can only recommend that you find out about Jesus from the New Testament, and decide for yourself if the actions you mention will be required.
Ethel Red says
100% Correct.
Mike says
Forget about the books for a moment .What do you see ,on the street , in Western societies and in Islamic societies about LGBT ?
Indiana Tom says
I am still trying to figure out how Islam can be against pedophilia when the believers get 6 year old wives and consummate them at 9 years old. Then there is the Bacha Baz and the Bacha Bazi boy play lifestyle which seems a walk on the LGBT side. Then Islam switches to the afterlife where the believer gets 72 virgins and being surrounded by numerous young boys.. I imagine the little boys do more than dance.
Mac-101 says
If you see a bunch of Afghanis in a circle all facin outwards, you do NOT want to look in the center and see what the young dancing boy and old man is doin!
nicu says
So true : hypocrites – for fun they use young boys – for reproduction ONLY – women .
each religion is an enemy to the LGBT community – except natives and Wicca !
Carol says
I was surprised to see all the open condemnations in the video regarding cross-dressing. How does this fit in with everyone knowing Moe’s favourite lounging outfits? Why you’d think muslims would be absolutely rushing to emulate such behaviour!
Mohammed seems to have been “groomed” as a boy and there are many clues that he had not turned into a “pure” as the driven snow heterosexual (BTW Learning Islam has added many more lesser-known examples in recent postings here).
Kepha says
The LGBTQXXXXX is an enemy to the human race. With rare exceptions, it’s allied with Islam against the West, It would prefer to be thrown off buildings or offer itself for bacha bazi to a Muslim warlord thanput up with Christians calling it to repentance.
Mac-101 says
You don’t want to know what happens on Thursday night prior to Friday Prayers either!
LeftisruiningCanada says
Islam is against pedophilia?
Kepha says
Leftisruining, since you appear to be a Christian, Muslims committing pedophilia while condemning it should be no surprise. It’s a matter of being descended from old Adam the First and hence subject to every sin there is, including hypocrisy.
LeftisruiningCanada says
Oh sure, no surprise here.
I’ve just heard muslims say they are against pedophilia before.
Maybe, as usual, they have their secret muslim dictionaries hidden behind their lying backs.
LeftisruiningCanada says
*never* heard….
gravenimage says
Kepha, it is *much* worse than this. The “Prophet” Muhammed was himself a pedophile, and he is considered the model for Muslim behavior in all things.
Save Europe says
You also omitted the massive and virulent bestiality which is common in the Ummah.
IanB says
No goat is safe in Dar al-Islam!
joanofark06 says
Wait, I thought it was a “donkey” that wasn’t safe!!??
FIFTEEN Muslim teens in Morocco have been treated for rabies after raping an infected local donkey
https://pamelageller.com/2017/10/muslim-teens-rape-rabid-donkey.html/
Oh, WAIT, it was a pony, that wasn’t safe:
Muslim Migrant Arrested for Raping Pony in German Kid’s Zoo
https://pamelageller.com/2017/11/musm-rapes-pony.html/
You gotta be kiddin me!! A CHICKEN???
Boy aged 14 arrested after being accused by neighbour of raping his pet chicken to death
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/boy-aged-14-arrested-after-11529108
Oh, surely a DEAD PERSON is safe, RIGHT!?? Ok, maybe BOTH are not safe!!
Islamic Teachings on Sex with Dead Humans and Animals
https://islam-watch.org/home/107-khalaf/1032-islamic-teachings-on-sex-with-dead-humans-and-animals.html
And you say these people are not from satan?? Who you think is going to be choppin off heads of the christians and jews (and others, and with satan’s blessing, of course) because they won’t take his mark, during the tribulation?
And you thought there was no reason or purpose, for all this immigration to all these MANY countries…HA….now you know! Who else could be so evil as to give THAT kind of punishment?? Besides, they hate the “people” of the “book” (the christians and jews).
Carolyne says
Yes, bestiality is permitted in the Koran and therefore in Islam. However, if one rapes a goat, they may not kill it and eat it. It must be sold to another village for their dinner—or whatever.
joanofark06 says
Islamic Teachings on Sex with Dead Humans and Animals
https://islam-watch.org/home/107-khalaf/1032-islamic-teachings-on-sex-with-dead-humans-and-animals.html
SICK SOB’S…
gravenimage says
Carolyne, this was actually in Khomeini’s “Little Green Book”.
But Sunnis think the same way.
gravenimage says
Islam is not opposed to pedophilia–the “Prophet” Muhammed himself was a pedophile.
And most of the time if a Muslim country attempts to raise the marriage age even slightly, the ones who oppose it are Muslim clerics.
Carol says
That undoubtedly correlates with their repulsiveness.
gravenimage says
It sure does, Carol. Even seventeen years after learning this, I am still stunned that a religion sacralizes the rape of children.
Indiana Tom says
It should prove interesting for the Liberals when they have to court both the LGBT community and the Muslim community at the same time. Pulse nightclub anyone?
And if a kingdom be divided against itself, that kingdom cannot stand.And if a house be divided against itself, that house will not be able to stand. Mark 3:24
Mac-101 says
The Devil has many Legions ALL against his common enemy, G-d.. The more they kill each other the happier Satan becomes. He hates ALL of Humanity!
Carolyne says
How is it you can speak for Satan?
Kepha says
Satan was formerly my king and father (John 8:44 and Col.1:13. I suspect Mac-101 may be thinking along similar lines. Yep. I’m guilty of treason. And proud of it.
Older Canadian says
Lets hope the liberal party’s house collapses and trudeau and his gang are homeless, forever.
LeftisruiningCanada says
Trudeau will be alright. He can always pay rent to stay with the aga khan on his fantasy island.
Carol says
FYI from Google:
Prince Karim Aga Khan IV, is the hereditary imam of the Ismaili muslims (a minority sect of the Shia) and a direct descendant of Muhammad.
Isma means immunity from sin and in Shia theology Isma is characteristic of PROPHETS, IMAMS, (and angels).
Sunnis far outnumber Shias and do not believe in the hereditary line – they instead choose their caliph.
Trudeau seems to be bringing in quite an assortment. I wonder if this is the “IRAN FACTOR?” (Harper closed down the Iranian Embassy for spying). I wonder how long before Sunni/Shia hostilities surface in our lands?
Ren Ostertag says
100+
Bill says
What I find shocking is that Tyrant Trudeau is now demanding that private persons sign loyalty oaths. How Soviet of him! A precursor of what is to follow.
Again, Trudeau and the globalists easily look by this bit of well documented hypocrisy, because Islam is the best and most efficient tool for destroying Western culture and civilization. That is essential to replacing it with a re-branded version of global socialism/communism run by literally a handful of political, business and academic elites and armies of mindless and soulless bureaucrats and police.. Call it socialism or communism if you will. I like to think of it as neo-feudalism. Once installed, thanks to the power of modern technology and weaponry, there will never be another renaissance.
Mac-101 says
Only logical explanation. The one that the Elites are ALL Stupid does not carry water.
Bill says
I agree. They are not stupid. They are very intelligent and now exactly what they are doing and why. The sooner we shed ourselves of the conceit that the elite “just do not get it”, the sooner we can attack the real problem. Like a firearm, Islam is a tool. It is who is using the tool and for what purpose, good or evil, that matters.
The tool analogy is not perfect. Despite what the left would have you believe, a firearm will not take itself off the table and shoot at things. An Islamic terrorist is a more autonomous tool. He or she can just get up and do damage. That is why it is such a good tool for the left and the elite. They simply need to plant it, direct it, and then let it do its work. A cultural smart bomb, so to speak.
Mac-101 says
I really believe Islam will be the forced religion of Satan’s Beast’s NWO!
Carol says
Bill…Justin Trudeau and his stacked deck are well-versed in how to milk a weak system and unfortunately wonderful Canada is now subjected to their arrogant, disrespectful machinations. Here’s a clever, creative “gay” fellow trying to explain:
Canada has a TERRIBLE system of government
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qU_CuvSOupU
gravenimage says
How do you explain all the ordinary people in deep denial over the threat of Islam?
StellaSaidSo says
‘…There will never be another Renaissance.’
Absolutely right, Bill.
We are standing on the edge of our last chance.
Older Canadian says
It is called the Machiavellian way. The father of political science whose seed was spread to create. socialism/communism/marxism.
Justins father was inspired and studied Machiavelli when he was a young lad in university. He was also an admirer of communist china and cuba, (this we all know).
Is it surprising that his son Justin has the views of his father ?
Is it surpising that Soro has donated money to canada for immigration.
Is it surprising that canada has made a donation(s) to the Clinton foundation.
Join the dots.
LeftisruiningCanada says
I joined some of the dots, but don’t like the picture very much.
It’s looks a bit like satan, and slavery, and death.
Kepha says
Macchiavelli–
Niccolo said it is right
For princes to scheme, lie, backbite.
But this sneaky slob
Couldn’t hold down a job,
Which is why he was forced to go write!
Macchiavelli was so scornful of the king of France who allowed all those counts of Toulouse, Metz, Tours, or whatever hang on to some real power, but never asked himself why it was the king of ramshackle feudal France who periodically rode over the Alps to ravage clear-eyed, tough-minded Italy (Macchiavelli, whom Calvin called a mere flatterer or princes, wasn’t saying anything that the Borgias, Medici, Colonnas, Sforzas and whatnot didn’t think they already knew). Claiming he had the plan to unify Italy and drive out the “barbarians” (French, Germans, Aragonese), Macchiavelli confirmed Italy in a mindset that kept it a prey and divided for another 300+ years. Speaking as one with a Ph. D. in political science, I think Macchiavelli just about the most over-rated thinker in the entire Western canon.
We badly need a way we can rebuild trust among each other. But I don’t see that happening any time soon.
Mary Boorman says
Bill – Yes, you are 150% correct in what you say here. Islamism is indeed the best tool the globalists have for destroying freedom and democracy. Utterly sickening!
bodega says
, Like Bill, I, too, think the end game is not integrating Muslims into an already stable culture such as Canada has and we have. The end game must be destruction of the stable culture’s values. I hadn’t given much thought to the final outcome as it is going to occur well after my death. But…
What a great way for the globalists to get their One World government under their control. I can see how easy it would be to subjugate huge numbers of people by making them essentially illiterate such as what we are doing here in the USA. That is just part and parcel of making them areligious, antifamily, anti-just-about-anything-any individual just to happen to not like. The calpacity to think broadly and logically will be essentially gone.
I think we have trouble ahead. Those of us who know what a wonderful thing a republican democracy is and have a constitution that protects the individual will mourn its loss.
I hope the people of Canada wake up. I doubt 50% of our population have the capacity to understand what is happening here.
Save Europe says
, Like Bill, I, too, think the end game is not integrating Muslims into an already stable culture such as Canada has and we have. The end game must be destruction of the stable culture’s values. I hadn’t given much thought to the final outcome as it is going to occur well after my death. But…
++++++++++++++
well let’s be honest about it – what does obsessive multi-culturalism lead to, and ultimately mean? It leads to the erosion of the host culture’s strength as it becomes weakened by multiple other cultures. It’s suicidal and displays a self hatred for one’s own culture.
LeftisruiningCanada says
Revolutionary socialists always hate their own culture and work to change it into something ‘better’.
JT’s dad was no different.
Kepha says
Well, Leftisruining, you’ve got neighbors south of the Great Lakes praying to you–although at this point, perhaps my country’s prayers are already an abomination to God (Prv. 28:9).
LeftisruiningCanada says
Well thanks, but i’m not accepting direct prayers at the moment, so please leave them after the beep 😉
Seriously though, if you’re in Christ, Kepha, then your prayers will avail much (James 5:16).
Mary Boorman says
Agreed. The capacity to think logically, strategically etc. will be very diminished
also due to the digital dementia now affecting our youth and dare I say it …. even
some of my retired friends are filling their day to day lives with Netflix, texting, social media
time and are completely and utterly addicted to it and cannot even see what has happened
to themselves. Bloody hell! What a great way to dumb down the masses.
ed says
Give it a few years there are plenty of tall buildings in Canada .
Infidel says
Best comment in this reg!! 🙂 🙂
Bill says
Yes there are. And they will not be attacked because there will be no need to. Trudeau is doing the work of Islam for them. He will quietly have all of Canada in thrall within a decade. Except maybe Alberta, Trudeau seems to have forgotten that Province exists. 🙂
Billy Chickens says
And once Islam rules, it will eat Trudeau and the Left for breakfast.
LeftisruiningCanada says
The NDP are busy working his brand of evil there anyway.
Carol says
Provinces apparently have the right to secede and there are those who think Alberta might be the first to do it.
LeftisruiningCanada says
There will be a long series of unexplained, lethal, high dives.
All the victims will be homosexuals.
Muslims will claim that they simply bumped into them while walking around the observation deck/roof top, when they became distracted by their own shoes or something.
They will be believed.
John van Doodewaard says
ISIS followers are merely doing what the Quran commands them to do. It proves that the Quran is equivalent to the Satanic Bible and Adolph Hitler’s Mein Kamph (My Struggle).
Islam is not a religion, but an extremely violent all life encompassing ideology, which does not tolerate any other faith. Those who do not convert to Islam, must be killed according to the Quran.
Save Europe says
Correct ? iSIS ARE Orthodox Muslims.
Dan says
Where do you even start on this?
Almost every major belief or political stance both groups practice, the other condemns.
And almost every major belief or political stance each condemns, they blatantly practice.
The only reason these two groups associate is because each sees the other as essential useful idiots for gaining power.
Arthur says
From my reading, homosexuals make up 3.8% of the US population. One might expect a similar percentage in Canada. Homosexuality is not something you recruit or force people into, whereas Islam easily does this, and therefore grows. Homosexuals do not reproduce, whereas Islam excels at using women as baby factories. Not to mention anything of the inherent use of violence in Islam which is not a part of the peacenik culture (except Antifa). The winner in the LGBTQ vs Islam contest is clear to see from the start.
Trudeau will abandon his LGBTQ base when the time comes, because above all, he wants to stay in power. I think Trudeau even sees that he must assimilate with Islam to retain power, lest he be viewed as outside of Islam’s power structure. Hence, he prays in mosques.
Trudeau is Canada’s Lenin.
Read Wikipedia’s first paragraph of Lenin’s biography. Change the names of places and people and it sounds like Justin Trudeau. Young rich kid protests capitalism in favor of socialism and becomes politically powerful.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Lenin
Older Canadian says
Ditto for Fidel Castro.
LeftisruiningCanada says
“From my reading, homosexuals make up 3.8% of the US population. One might expect a similar percentage in Canada”
Going solely from the content of CBC Radio 1, you would think that the percentage in Canada is closer to 75%.
Kepha says
Why do you think the LGBTQXXX’s and their allies ran the RC Church out of the adoption business in both the District of Columbia and Illinois? BTW, I am not a Roman Catholic.
MFritz says
Very easy!
Ten steps how Trudeau’s tolerance will “improve” Canadian society over the years:
1. more islamic migrants
2. more laws for special status, not to offend their “culture” and forbid any criticism
3. less LGBTQ content (advertisements etc.) in public not to offend them
4. showing homosexuality in public declared “problematic”
5. being homosexual declared an “issue”
6. sharia law partly introduced to “help” minority feel more at home
7. open homosexuality declared “sinful” and/or “illegal”
8. sharia law fully introduced
9. LGBTQ prosecuted
10. most LGBTQ dead or gone
Canada will reach stage 3 soon.
mortimer says
Fritz, the party-line neo-Marxists of today will do what the party-line Bolsheviks did… they will eventually backtrack on Islam (… they will backtrack should the modern Leftards even get that chance). They will eventually throw Muslims under the bus on the grounds that Islam discriminates against gays and women.
Modern neo-Marxist governments are leading an incompatible, incoherent coalition of groups that hate one another, but together they hate a common enemy, freedom-loving, independent-minded people of all races. Then they call such free, independent people ‘racist’. This incoherence makes no sense, unless you realize it’s a divide-and-rule strategy. Our job is to continually HIGHLIGHT and EXPOSE the strategic and OPPORTUNISTIC INCOHERENCE of the neo-Marxists. They are SIMULTANEOUSLY betraying MUSLIMS, WOMEN AND GAYS.
MFritz says
Sorry, but your version of things is way too high up in the clouds. This is not the 1960s and there’s no more Soviet Union around financing “global communism”.
Politicians like Trudeau are foremost populists and fully corrupted by globalists. It’s ONLY about these opportunists getting MONEY and POWER. Their political parties pandered to the feminists, leftists and homosexuals because the right ignored these groups. Or even outright despise(d) them in the past.
Now they pander to the (muslim) migrants because their globalist overlords want more breeders to come. We lame-ass Westerners are simply not having enough children, you see.
And they most certainly will drop women and gays under the bus once the time is ready. Keeping their power is not depending on the population’s interests (anymore) but ONLY who finances their sorry asses. And it’s not us.
Besides, they have seen that majority muslim countries never touch their elites. You may have enormous social pressure on the people in Iran (pseudo-democracy) or Saudi Arabia (feudal state) due to islam and sharia law, but their rich and powerful leaders do whatever they please ANYWAY. And that’s exactly where “our” leaders want to go too.
StellaSaidSo says
They have already thrown women under the bus. Otherwise, a succinct summation, MFritz.
gravenimage says
Mortimer wrote:
They will eventually throw Muslims under the bus on the grounds that Islam discriminates against gays and women.
………………………….
Mortimer–with all respect–I do *not* believe that objecting to Muslim’s discrimination against gays and women is ‘throwing them under the bus’.
Jack Holan says
This is an excellent topic to brought up to the public. Mssr/PM Justin Trudeau has What straight people would view as a philosophical dilemma to embrace one minority group at the expense of the other. Numbers would suggest that the future is theirs as a political power block of voters. On the other hand the LBGTQ community are far more wealthy than mos groups and in practical terms could leverage more voters and work to get Federal projects accepted by the powerbroker.
You would think as Defendor is His People He would be concerned futurex. His lack of true connection to the Jewish Community at large seem clear to this Yank below the border. He mouths all the correct phases on que but when it comes providing physical protection and criminal action against Muslims making the threats towards Jews. Now Justin stands at the crossroad of choice. He must decide Canada’s future!
islamkills says
I despise him for all the reasons already mentioned above and then some. We have to save Canada from this tool. His new voters are entering illegally every day in the hundreds. These are his new votes. If he gets in again, people will lose their freedom of speech (sharia) will be taxed to death even more. He’s a liar and hypocrite only for the muslims. Get rid of him. Vote Scheer!
6woods says
Scheer doesn’t stand a chance. No-one knows him, he doesn’t have Trudeau’s “charisma” (puke!), and Canadians in general want to demonstrate above all that they’re not like those “racist Americans” who voted Trump (there’s huge Trump-derangement in this country). They won’t vote conservative….they’d rather drink rat poison.
gravenimage says
The PM before this one was Conservative. But you may be right aobut the situation right now.
gravenimage says
about
6woods says
I thought Steven Harper was a great Prime Minister. He understood Islam and wasn’t afraid to name the enemy; I had so much respect for him for that alone. Unfortunately, when Trudeau Junior threw his hat into the ring, the blue-haired set who just loved Fascist-Senior back in the day came out of the woodwork, and their naive starry-eyed grandkids followed granny’s suit.
tgusa says
Leftists keep say that diversity is their strength but I keep seeing their type of diversity a weakness. The fatal flaw in western leftism is that across the board they are brainless.
gravenimage says
Canada: Trudeau and the Islamic perspective on the LGBTQ community
……………………….
The “Islamic perspective” is to murder gay people. How does that fit into Trudeau’s Canada?
Politicianophobia says
May I ask all the Imams whatever happened to love one another?
gravenimage says
That is Christian scripture. Muslims believe that Jews and Christians “corrupted” their holy texts, which were supposedly orignially just as savage as Islam. (Never mind that there is no evidence for this).
There is no love or compassion in Islam.
kuriakose says
Muhammedans have no problems with male to male sex to satiate lust. What they don’t want are those who are homosexuals or lesbians. See the following hadith:
Sahih Muslim – Book of Menstruation – hadith #525 – Commentary
Our companions have said that if the penile head has penetrated a woman’s anus, or a man’s anus, or an animal’s vagina or its anus then it is necessary to wash whether the one being penetrated is alive or dead, young or old, whether it was done intentionally or absentmindedly, whether it was done willfully or forcefully. This also applies if the woman places the male member inside her while the man is asleep, whether the penis is erect or not, whether the penis is circumcised or uncircumcised. All these situations require that the person committing the act and the one the act is committed on must wash themselves, unless the person committing the act or the person the act is committed on is a young male or female. In that case it cannot be said that the person must wash, for they do not have the responsibility, rather it is said that this person is in a state of impurity. If that person can discern (the sexual act) then his guardian can command him to wash just as he commands him to perform the ablution washing for prayers. For if he prays without washing, his prayer has not been performed correctly; likewise if he doesn’t wash after he reaches puberty he must be forced to wash. If he washed as a youth and then reaches puberty, then he does not have to repeat the washing. Our companions have said that intercourse occurs when a healthy male’s penile head completely penetrates (an orifice), as has been unanimously agreed. Thus, when the penile head has completely disappeared (inside the orifice), then all the regulations concerning washing apply. It is unanimously agreed that it is not necessary that the entire penile shaft penetrate to apply the regulations of washing. If part of the penile head penetrates, then the regulations of washing are not imposed as is agreed, except by an odd few of our companions who said that even in this case all the regulations of washing apply. However, this opinion is wrong, rejected and abandoned. If the male member was severed and what remained was less than the length of the penile head, then none of the washing regulations apply. If the part remaining was equal in length to the penile head length then that part must completely penetrate for the regulation of washing to apply. If the part remaining was greater in length to the penile head length then there are two famous opinions for our companions. The most correct is that if the portion that penetrates is equal to the length of the penile head, then the regulations for washing apply. The other opinion is that none of the regulations for washing apply until the entire remaining length of the penile shaft completely penetrates and Allah knows best. If a man wraps a sheath around his male member and then ejaculates inside a woman’s vagina, then there are three opinions from our companions. The most famous is that the man must wash. The second is that he does not have to wash because he ejaculated inside the sheath. The third is that if the sheath is thick and prevents climax and wetness (in the vagina) then washing is not necessary, otherwise it is necessary and Allah knows best. If a woman inserts (in her vagina) an animal’s penis she must wash, and if she inserts a detached penis (thakaran maktu-an, lit. “a severed male member”) there are two opinions; the most correct is that she must wash.
To put it crudely, any hole will do to satiate muhammedan lust.
6woods says
“If the penile head has penetrated….whether intentionally or absent-mindedly…”
I take it there’s a lot of absent-minded boinking, whether of goats or anything/anyone else, in your typical islamic shithole.
Carol says
That last sentence is super creepy. Could it be a battlefield-type happening? It makes you wonder what goes on in the privacy of their homes.
6woods says
Actually, this whole passage made me wanna lose my lunch. It’s fascinating, though, how islam tries to normalize all sorts of depravity with rules…as though, if you follow these convoluted rules to the letter, it’s ok to be a sick bastard.
gravenimage says
All true.
Same sex pedophilia and rape to humiliate are fine–what Islam hates is any consensual homosexual relations.
Politicianophobia says
#1 Canadian who needs to be removed from office, Justine Trudeau, 2. Iqra Khalid, 3. Omar Alghabra, 4. Maryam Monsef, 5. Ahmed Hussen, all the Liberals and NDP who supported M-103 aka the blasphemy law. Treason, sedition use to be a serious charges in Canada before….
StellaSaidSo says
Canadians need to prepare now for the 2019 election, esp in getting viable candidates in place in all electorates held by traitors. You can be sure that, come 2019, there will be even more Muslim names (and those of Islam’s enablers) on ballot papers than previously. Canada is under attack. This may be your last chance.
Carolyne says
Trudeau often says “Diversity is our strength,” with no proof of such. I believe our strength is in unity, not diversity.
LeftisruiningCanada says
Who is the “our” that he refers to though?
Maybe he doesn’t mean all Canadians.
StellaSaidSo says
‘Diversity is our strength’
This mantra is repeated by leftist enablers of Islam everywhere. I have never received a remotely convincing answer to the question ‘in what way?’ when I have challenged those who utter it.. They think it is self-evidently true, and that anyone who questions it is either ignorant and stupid, or a ‘racist bigot Islamophobe’. In which case, they consider themselves under no obligation to listen to any counter argument. And so their comfortable life in the bubble of denial continues.
Politicianophobia says
It is time for all Canadians to tell Justine this is not THE AGE OF ISLAM.
joanofark06 says
“Canadian Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau touts himself as a leader who equality and rights for the LGBTQ community. At the same time, he also embraces and promotes the growing Islamist movement in Canada, which views homosexuality as a crime punishable by lashing and even death. And the Islamists make no secret of their views.”
Yup, on the note, let’s see him in action, tooting his OWN horn, on Islam AND homosexuilty:
Canadian Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, makes very odd invocation to allah for a happy gay pride
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I3PGmS6K97E
UNCLE VLADDI says
i.e: “We won’t let you have some of your own tax money back to pay for a summer job unless you agree with us that killing babies is a good idea!”
– Justine Turdeau’s Libertine party animals –
UNCLE VLADDI says
i.e: “We won’t let you have some of your own tax money back to pay for a summer job unless you agree with us that killing babies is a good idea!”
– Justine Turdeau’s Libertine party animals –
UNCLE VLADDI says
THIS IS BOTH HOW AND WHY there is no crime or perversion a libertine “liberal” criminal won’t automatically compromise with or Submit to!
http://unclevladdi.blogspot.ca/2018/01/the-problem-of-mental-illness-solved.html
Lydia Church says
A few points of clarity here.
1. I am a Christian and follow the Bible. The Bible does call homosexuality a sin. We see that in Romans 1 and 1 Cor. 6 and in the OT as well.
2. Yes, there are other sins too. That does not justify this one nor any other.
3. We are all sinners in need of salvation from sin, which Christ offers to all of us, ours for the taking. Once we receive it, we receive power to overcome sin, and no longer are slaves to it. There are consequences for straying, I don’t intend to get into all of that here. We can’t expect the world to act like the redeemed, but we can’t rejoice when sin is celebrated, nor can we say to anyone because of the sin nature…”have at it!” We are to call out sin. The Bible says that the Holy Spirit is sent to convict the world of sin, righteousness, and judgment. We do have a role to play in this since as Christians we have the Holy Spirit living inside of us and God chooses to use us as a vehicle to call the lost to repentance and sinners to salvation, lovingly but with conviction of course.
4. The OT had certain rules that did involve the death penalty for certain sins, to keep the society pure. As science has shown, Aids is one result of sodomy, and innocent babies can be born with it as a result of the sin of adults, so this was not ‘innocent fun’ that did not hurt anyone.
5. However, the NT approach is not to stone anyone to death. We are to love the sinner while we hate the sin. The apostles of Jesus went out and shared the gospel and sinners got saved. Some of them were former gays but left that lifestyle after turning to Christ. We see that in 1 Cor. 6; 9-11. So obviously they did not go around stoning anyone to death, but extended the gospel of grace instead, some got saved and everyone moved on from there.
6. The laws were executed in the nation of Israel regarding the OT, but we do draw from the morality in modern Western society today, which is a good thing. Of course people are not put to death over this issue.
7. Christians stand against the sin of homosexuality. That is God’s righteous standard. But that does not mean we go around demeaning gays, calling them names or worse, or anything like that. We don’t bake their wedding cakes, because that is participation in sin. But we are as civilized to them as anyone else, including extending Good Samaritan forms of help, etc. When it comes to being ‘yoked,’ the only place that has any bearing is within the church. There are sinners all over the landscape. If we said we won’t be ‘yoked’ with them, then we could never walk down the street or go to work or ride a bus or an airplane. Just because we are on the same planet does not imply that we are ‘yoked’ with anyone. To be ‘yoked,’ it involves some sort of agreement on our part that is of a spiritual nature. For example, I can’t attend church where that sin is embraced because that would spiritually ‘yoke’ me, or a prayer group where one is openly gay, or taking communion with such unrepentant in that way, that sort of thing. Or condoning that in some way via a family agreement that recognizes gay marriage such as attending a gay wedding, etc. So we can work with people but we can’t bake their gay wedding cakes. The first is just being in the world but not of the world, the second would be to condone the sin, which we cannot and will not do. The Lord calls us to be separate from the worldly ways and from sin and false teaching. If some gays with a bakery said they did not want to bake a cake that said something they did not believe, such as what I believe, I would just move on with my life, but many are not as tolerant as me in this way, they want to sue people who refuse to comply with coerced speech that they do not agree with and that violates their consciences. Not everyone agrees, that is life and that is besides the point, it’s not about folks agreeing with ‘you,’ it’s the fact that we won’t be forced and we have the right to say no. And no matter what, we will say no. And they never go after the muslim bakeries, only Christian ones, because they have an anti-Christian agenda. If you must know, they don’t even care about the cakes or they would just move on as well.
8. The term ‘homophobic’ is just as much a ‘non word’ as ‘islamophobic,’ because in both cases as a Christian, I am against either the ideological error, violence, or sin. I do not hate any people, just what they are involved in. I am against the sin, etc. That is not ‘fear’ or ‘phobic’ any more than being against the evil religion of islam is ‘phobic’ in a real sense. It would make no sense to say I ‘fear’ either one, because that is not the case. Some may ‘fear’ terrorism or aids just as much, but that is different. I actually ‘fear’ neither for other reasons. I am not afraid to die and I know it won’t be from aids. True Christians also don’t go around acting in violence against either of these groups of people. But if people do that, that is also not ‘phobic,’ (fear), that is just plain violent. And I’m not talking about the Crusades, which was a defense against invasion just like with the nazi’s. It was either them or us. It is always done defensively, not offensively. And there is leeway there as well, such as the Amish, but I won’t get into that here either. The point being that it would make no more sense to say that one is “pharmaphobic” just because they are against drug use, or “abortophobic” just because of being against abortion, or “DUI-ophobic” for being against drunk driving, etc.
I did not have time to read each comment, these are just a few basics on the issue.
( ;
Lydia Church says
And for the sake of ‘brevity’ because I wanted to keep it… you know…. short.
: D