Once again, London mayor Sadiq Khan is promoting an irresponsible brand of “diversity” over the interests of Londoners. Despite the surge in violent crime “overtaking England and Wales — and Britain’s multicultural capital, in particular,” Sadiq Khan is blaming the surge in recorded violent crime on falling police numbers. However, guess where he intends to allocate more police resources toward, as a top priority? Hate crimes. “Evidence suggests that pressure from Khan and politically correct police chiefs is leading to significant resources being redirected” towards “crimes” such as “offensive communications,” largely in social media.
Although followup prosecution of those arrested in this witch hunt is proving to be “fruitless,” Khan has been “setting aside millions of pounds” of taxpayer money for “an online hate crime hub.” Meantime, the hard-working public remains in danger from violent crime and jihad attacks.
Beyond London, too, Northumbria Police took the time to hunt down Facebook users who made “offensive” comments about Muslim grooming gangs in January 2018.
Last summer, Trump berated Khan over his irresponsible response to jihad attacks in London. Then, close to the turn of the new year, Khan stated against Trump that “London is a beacon of tolerance, acceptance and diversity,” and for that precise reason, an official visit by U.S. President Donald Trump would “not be welcomed.”
Even before Khan’s election as mayor, his “dealings with Islamic extremists” raised doubts “over his suitability as London’s next mayor,” a position that he should not have occupied, as he has been pushing a clear agenda. His other mischief includes:
- endorsing anti-Semites, defending 9/11 terrorists, and defending an al Qaeda member.
- playing the victimology narrative, to the point of cautioning Westerners to play by the rules of Islamic supremacists, so as to not upset them to the point of joining jihadi groups.
- calling deadly jihad attacks “part and parcel” of life in a big city.
- calling progressive Muslims who want to live in unison with Westerners “uncle Toms.”
“While Khan Blames Crime Wave on Cuts, Fall in Police Numbers Could Be Plugged by Redeploying ‘Hate Crime’ Officers”, by Jack Montgomery, Breitbart, January 26, 2018:
Sadiq Khan is blaming the surge in recorded crime on falling police numbers — but figures show the annual decline could be plugged by redeploying ‘hate crime’ officers from London alone.
The London mayor has suggested that the crime wave overtaking England and Wales — and Britain’s multicultural capital, in particular — is a consequence of falling police numbers, in an opinion piece published by the left-liberal Guardian.Figures reported elsewhere in the newspaper do show a fall of some 930 officers over the last 12 months, to 121,929 overall — but this represents a reduction in total manpower of less than 1 per cent.
Meanwhile, recorded crime rose by 14 per cent overall across 44 police force areas in England and Wales — including a 32 per cent rise in domestic burglary, a 29 per cent rise in robbery, a 23 per cent rise in sex offences, a 21 per cent rise in knife crime, and a 20 per cent rise in gun crime.
In fact, with the London alone boasting over 900 police officers “dedicated to investigating hate crime” — one of Khan’s top priorities as mayor — it seems likely that the annual fall could be more than adequately compensated by redeploying existing resources.
Evidence suggests that pressure from Khan and politically correct police chiefs is leading to significant resources being redirected towards offences most members of the public would not consider priorities in a time of rising violent crime.
For example, figures obtained through Freedom of Information requests revealed that some 3,395 people across 29 police force areas — 13 refused the requests, two released unusable data — were arrested under section 127 of the Communications Act 2003, which makes it illegal to intentionally “cause annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety to another”, in 2016.
This represented a massive increase from previous years, with police forces increasing arrests for “offensive” communications — largely social media posts — by up to 877 per cent compared to 2014.
The authorities’ determination to focus on such crimes — despite a fall in actual prosecutions suggesting the arrests are largely fruitless — shows no sign of letting up, with Khan setting aside millions of pounds for an “online hate crime hub”.
Beyond London, too, Northumbria Police took the time to hunt down Facebook users who made “offensive” comments about Muslim grooming gangs in January 2018, with the force warning people using social media “that they should do so responsibly and ensure they do not post anything which could be considered offensive”.
Khan has arguably worsened the crime situation not only by pushing for an increased focus on “hate crime” rather than violent and acquisitive crime, but also by limiting the use of some of law enforcement’s most effective tools…..
StellaSaidSo says
Sadiq Khant.
mortimer says
Yes, Stella, he khan’t imagine how increasing numbers of Muslim gangs, ISIS supporters and radicalization have anything to do with the crime wave.
Muslims are above criticism. In Sharia law, a Muslim should not criticize a fellow Muslim. Only dirty kafirs or Joooze are to blame when anything goes wrong.
Mr. Khan, we knew that.
Andy says
An important message to Nationalists
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MlNtIMAdvLk
gravenimage says
Why are you posting this racist, antisemitic claptrap here? And who uses German black letter and rants about power but neo-Nazis?
Andy, I can only hope you didn’t watch this video very closely. It has nothing to do with standing against Jihad.
Roderick MacUalraig says
No bueno, Andy.
Red says
Quite Right. The message is the truth
those who ridicule are the enemy
Patriots are GO
LeftisruiningCanada says
What was said about not giving up, and what we will say to our children etc is all very good and fine.
But when Tyndall says “we know who (((they))) are”, it spoils the whole thing for me…as does his fascination with “POWER”. Quite usual for a Fascist.
Shame, because he was a fantastic speaker from the sounds of it, would have made a fine PM if not for the unpleasant political associations he had.
martin says
NAZI BNP ALERT
Roderick MacUalraig says
There’s a better one similar. A typical put down in the UK, also applied to males, and especially males like Sadiq. But can’t write it here.
StellaSaidSo says
Yep. It was intended to be read that way too!
Roderick MacUalraig says
Brilliant. Thanks for the laugh.
LeftisruiningCanada says
She knows how a landanah saands 😉
J D S says
Calling London…Calling London….You reap what you have sewn
You elected this man therefore till you come to your sensed you will have to live with many changes that he and his like have in store for you….Don’t cry or beg…there is nothing you can do till you elect new people who have your values in mind…or has your values dwindled ????
PABLO says
Khan has a 7th century “Muslim” mentality and you are seeing the results it brings.
London bridge has fallen down and you can thank all those descendants of indigenous Brits who voted for him.
mortimer says
Yes, Khan has the OVERLORD mentality.
Jayell says
‘All those descendants of indigenous Brits’ in London? Which bus are they on?
PABLO says
They are on a bus whose final stop is at a place called self destruction.
Jayell says
Aka Tower Hamlets.
StellaSaidSo says
Maximus, it is a mistake to assume that every candidate who wins an election does so in a fair fight. The days of clean, honest elections are over.
Jack Dawkins says
Why is section 127 of the Communications Act 2003, which makes it illegal to intentionally “cause annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety to another” not applied to the koran? That book has me suffering from extreme fear.
mortimer says
Jack, that means you may not even tell a joke. However, Muslims may make DEATH THREATS and never be stopped… to criticise Muslims is considered ‘Islamophobic’ because Muslims have a SPECIAL RIGHT of never hearing criticism.
UK now has a SNOWFLAKE culture and Khan is using it to promote DHIMMITUDE.
https://vimeo.com/239050403
Westman says
Mortimer, that video is hilarious – and contains so much truth.
mortimer says
KHAN’S MOVE IS ETHNIC CLEANSING AIMED AT PUTTING ISLAMIC SUPREMACISM BEHIND A WALL OF UNTOUCHABILITY. It is DHIMMIFICATION.
CRIME, you say? WHAT crime? The INNOCENCE of Muslims is always declared in the spirit of Sharia law. A DIRTY KAFIR may not accuse a Muslim of crime… after all.
SADIQ KHAN KNOWS that Islam NEVER apologizes even when the crimes go on and on for 1400 years, 120 million killed in the black African slave trade (the most vicious of all slave trades), 60 million Christians killed and millions enslaved, 80 million Hindus slaughtered, and ethnic cleansing everywhere to destroy host cultures. That is what Khan is doing… LEGAL JIHAD to remove the human rights and civil liberties of women and DIRTY KUFAAR!
Indiana Tom says
“Evidence suggests that pressure from Khan and politically correct police chiefs is leading to significant resources being redirected” towards “crimes” such as “offensive communications,” largely in social media.
Khan has been “setting aside millions of pounds” of taxpayer money for “an online hate crime hub.” The hard-working public remains in danger from jihad attacks.
This is not a bug, this is a feature. by design.
steve says
So, note well very well, all ye supine, Islam-sycophant, English. Voltaire said it well; ”To learn who REALLY rules over you, simply find out who you are not ALLOWED to criticise. ‘and in case you are deflected by B.B.C. pro-Islamic, propagandised-disinformation, that means ALL Islam and ALL Muslims….and while your righteous, snowflake-liberal anger simmers down over my suggestion, ask your primary school children if they enjoyed their educational-compulsory visit to a Mosque………..
Peter says
Guess the Brits will have to stiffen their upper lip even further, as their country is further colonized and then given over to the adherents of the “religion of peace” without a fight.
Infidel says
Does this piece of trash of a Mayor know that in the present century… beginning 2001, ISLAM has unleashed a NON-STOP ORGY OF VIOLENCE AND MASS MURDER ON HUMANITY AND looks like it is not going to stop anytime soon..
Karen says
“… not post anything which could be considered offensive”.
And the standard for judging the threshold of offense is….?
These little visits from the police are very chilling and sound exactly like something Hillary would impose, if she ever got the chance.
Walter Sieruk says
What else but nonsense actions may be expected by mayor Khan. Likewise, with anything that Khan says it would be wise to consider the source. For example, that Muslim mayor of London said “Those terrorist attacks on London were performed by men [the terrorists] who were trying to justly their action by the religion I belong to …their ideology is a perversion [ of Islam ] and has no place in Islam” The Muslin mayor, Sadiq Khan, of the capital city of England further said that he is “Outraged at those who try to hide their evil with Islam.” He could be in a genuine mental state of denial about the violent and deadly of many of the parts of Islam or by contrast he might know and is attempting to cover up the truth about the violent essence of Islam. Likewise, the prime minster of England, Theresa May, when make public statements about those violent and vicious terrorist attacks on London Bridge and nearby Borough Market. She has declared this heinous religious terror attack as the outcome of “an ideology that is a perversion of Islam,” That statement shows that she didn’t do her homework. For those jihadist Muslims were putting in the practice the instruction of real, actual, non-watered down hard core Islam. As the Quran in, for example, Surah 9:123 instructs “O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you…” Running over non-Muslims with a van and then stabbing them is a very effective way of showing people who are not Muslims harshness. Also Surah 9:111 teaches “The believers fight in Allah’s Cause, they slay and are slain, they kill and are killed…” The whole foundation for the ideology of Islamic terrorism is the theology of the Quran. As seen in those two, just sited, verses from the Quran and other verses well, such as, Surah 4:89. 5:33 47:4. Teresa May also denounced “Extremism.” This type of “Extremism” is based on the Quran.
MFritz says
Just ask a Hindu what he can tell you about people named “Khan”.
Elizabeth Lawson says
The. Muslim mayor of London is deranged if he cannot see that his decisions negatively affect the desired outcome of law and order. Bias has no place in governance. What Mr. Khan is attempting to replicate is all the sadness, violence, ignorance, stupidity and outrageous tragedy on sees on the streets of countries like the one he hailed from – Pakistan! Pakistan stands as a graphic example of all that civilized people would choose Not to want. What on earth is wrong with the. British that they permitted this uncivilized man to govern what was once a great city?
Sense and Sensibility says
London is generally fairly evenly divided between the two main British political parties, and control tends to switch fairly often – it’s not like some other cities here (and many of your cities in the US) where political control is always in the hands of one party. Khan’s election happened at a time when his Labour party were locally quite popular, and he ran against a rather odd character from the opposing party, and he ran on a fairly populist campaign which was mostly focused on big promises about this city’s housing problems – i.e. ordinary political policy issues like a normal candidate. During the campaign, he presented himself as a modernised, integrated, almost in-name-only Muslim, strongly denying any similarity to the islamist barbarians.
As a London resident myself, I can testify that many people here believed him. Even now, his pro-islamic activities aren’t local headline news, because it’s still only a minor aspect of the overall political picture in London. To the observant, it’s clear that Khan is quietly laying groundwork for more islamicisation, but mostly not in an obvious high-profile way which would get everyone’s attention. If he loses his re-election (which he might), then it’ll be mainly because of other factors, such as his failure to deliver on his big promises about housing problems.
Actually the bigger problem for increased islamicisation in the UK is Khan’s national party leader, Jeremy Corbyn. Corbyn isn’t himself a Muslim, but has a long history of links to overtly hardline islamists (he has described Hamas terrorists as his “good friends”, etc.), and is generally much more anti-western than Khan – even to the extent that within the Labour party, Khan is actually aligned with one of the relatively moderate factions, opposed to the extremism of Corbyn’s national leadership. If Corbyn becomes UK Prime Minister (which he might), that’s when the islamists will really celebrate.
Khan is certainly worthy of opposition, but his policy of islamicisation is relatively gradualist, so it’s a mistake to focus on him as if he were the main problem over here.
mousey says
sense,
would you, in london, be afraid to post a youtube video that showed something anti-islam? How much are uk people really restricting their postings to the internet in fear of police knocking on their door? If you had a video to post that you believed could get you in trouble, what safe avenues do you know of where you could post without getting caught?
Sense and Sensibility says
@mousey
It depends what you mean by “anti-islam” … but on the whole, no, I wouldn’t do it.
I can’t see any problem with the sort of material which Robert Spencer publishes here at Jihad Watch, a factual presentation of what islam itself says about islam. However, Robert and his fellow experts already do that job better than I’d be able to do it, so I can’t see anything which I could usefully add.
On the other hand, if you mean something more ranting and provocative, then I’m not much in favour of that, both because I think public ranting usually turns people off and because provocation is illegal here. I don’t agree with some of our laws, but nevertheless I don’t want to become a criminal.
Over here in Europe, there’s no right to free speech in the broad sense which Americans are accustomed to having from their First Amendment. It’s much more restricted here because the ECHR explicitly allows governments to restrict speech according to whatever they decide is “necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary”. That’s a long list of exceptions to free expression, and of course some of those exceptions have allowed governments to get away with very wide-ranging restrictions which would undoubtedly be unconstitutional in the US. In particular, the “disorder” and “reputation” caveats mean that courts have upheld laws which make it illegal to say various things which might tempt someone else to protest.
You’ll note that Robert himself is banned from my country, even though he’s calm and reasonable! More provocative authors get thrown in prison over here … although of course it all depends upon who they do (or don’t) prosecute, and I’ve never heard of them bothering to prosecute an islamist for hate-speech.
StellaSaidSo says
Sense, I know it took years for it to happen, but wasn’t Anjem Choudary locked up for hate speech?
mousey says
thank you s & s,
personally, i’ve found that youtube videos that simply document what is happening are the best way to learn the goings on of some foreign place. I worry that europeans will be increasing afraid to post documentary videos.
gravenimage says
Both Corbyn and Khan are very dangerous to Britain.
StellaSaidSo says
Excellent summation of London situation, Sense, very consistent with reports received from other Londoners. Khan is exposed now as a deceiver, and also as a failure when it comes to fulfilling his election promises, and in dealing with rising crime. He is dangerous, but Corbyn is the bigger threat. Under a Corbyn gov’t, the Islamisation of Britain would definitely accelerate.
Mag says
?
Lydia Church says
This is what they have in mind when they say ‘counter-terrorism’ measures.
Totally opposite of common sense, ironically of course!
gravenimage says
London’s Muslim mayor invests in police hunt against “offensive communication” amid violent crime surge
……………………
Why go after Muslim criminals when you can go after those who have a problem with Muslims victimizing us? *Ugh*.
Wellington says
Khan, in microcosm, is indicative of what has happened to Britain. N.B., it is not a good “happening,” to put it mildly.
The home, i.e., Britain, where freedom was inexorably and laudably reborn after the demise of ancient Greece, is ever increasingly becoming a place where freedom has no place any longer. This is sad beyond all measure. It’s also stupid in the extreme. How fitting, though, since sadness and stupidity so often go hand-in-hand where any defense of Islam occurs, whether by Muslim or non-Muslim.
Islam is an enemy of freedom. Take it from there and know full well that anyone defending Islam as in any way an enlightened phenomenon, or even just some kind of neutral in this regard, betrays freedom.
Yes, between Islam and freedom, one must make a choice. Can’t have both. Doubt me? Well then, name a single free Islamic nation today, of which there are over fifty. Can’t do it. No, no one could and thus serving as a condemnation of Islam, the worst religion of all time, if ever there were one.
CRUSADER says
That’s Muslim supervision in the West.
Is this REALLY what we are settling on?
David M says
warning people using social media “that they should do so responsibly and ensure they do not post anything which could be considered offensive”.
Free speech means the right to offend others. This Muslim clown is confirming there is no free speech in England anymore. Are the British just going to take this without a fight?
Tom says
Just returned from the UK and saw and heard police vehicle sirens going regularly throughout the day and night.
I have been to the UK on numerous occasions over the years and have never known there to be so much police activity as I witnessed on my most recent trip.
There appears to be a huge upswing in crime in the UK and in talking with folks there they confirm that in many areas it isn’t very wise to go alone especially at night.
This subjective view seems to be supported by stats appearing to show an increase in reported assaults. Certainly what I personally saw was not a lack of police but an increase in the number of responses requiring the use of police vehicles travelling at a high rate of speed.
gravenimage says
I’m afraid this does not surprise, Tom.
Politicianophobia says
Sayyid Qutb said “The chasm between Islam and Jahiliyyah is great, and the bridge is not to be built across it so that the people on the two sides may mix with each other, but only so that the people of Jahiliyyah may come over to Islam, whether they reside in a so-called Islamic country and consider themselves muslims or they are outside the ‘Islamic’ country, in order that they may come out of the darkness into the light and may rid their miserable conditior, and enjoy those blessings which we have tasted–we who have understood Islam and live in its atmosphere.”
StellaSaidSo says
Interesting that Qutb managed to experience Western life, spending two years in the US. I think he rather enjoyed being appalled by American women, American music, and American freedom. He was hanged in Cairo in 1966, along with 6 other members of the Muslim Brotherhood, for plotting to assassinate President Gamal Abdel Nasser. Qutb’s ideas still have a lot of influence in Islamist circles.
gravenimage says
And what was Qutb so scandalized by? A church dance in a dry county (no alcohol) in small-town Colorado in 1948. He makes this innocent pleasure sound like a bacchanal. Just ludicrous.
Del says
” illegal to intentionally “cause annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety to another” ” = Islam.
gravenimage says
🙂
Jacqueleen says
The Muslim mayor is bound and determined to bring Islam to London and Sharia Law to its courts…
WHAT A HUGE MISTAKE TO MAKE HIM THE MAYOR……EVICT AND BAN EVERY MUSLIM TO THE MIDDLE EAST. Let them live in caves and tents in the desert and kill one another…for this is all they know.
Ban the uncivilized from any civilized nation……Enough is enough…
ARE THERE ANY BRITISH LEFT IN LONDON?
StellaSaidSo says
‘ARE THERE ANY BRITISH LEFT IN LONDON?’
Yes, but their numbers are falling. Can’t blame people for leaving – but unfortunately their vote leaves with them, making the enemy harder to dislodge at the next election.
City by city, town by town, street by street, the predator advances.
gravenimage says
Yes–and surrenduring your greatest city to the Muslim barbarians is especially suicidal.
carlos danger says
Khan Job
StellaSaidSo says
Yep. Huge.
Matt Berg says
Another issue below documenting the problems in London. Of course depraved areas are brought up but immigrant/refugees are not.
Fly-tipping in the face of the evidence
by Peter Jones The number of fly-tipping incidents recorded by councils in England has gone up every year since 2012/13. In 2016/17, the total number of fly-tips exceeded a million for the first time since 2008/09. Around two-thirds of incidents…
https://www.linkedin.com/redir/redirect?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Eisonomia%2Eco%2Euk%2F%3Fp%3D5198&urlhash=rF2y&_t=tracking_anet