• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Los Angeles: Hamas-linked CAIR protests “appalling, Islamophobic” accurate 7th grade material on Islam

Jan 29, 2018 7:59 am By Robert Spencer

“The sheet of paper distributed by the teacher states Sharia Law, or Islamic religious law, gives Muslim men sexual rights over any woman or girl not wearing the hijab or head scarf; allows a man to marry an infant girl and consummate the marriage when she is 9; and requires Muslims to lie to non-Muslims to advance their faith.”

This material may not be appropriate for seventh-graders, and it is indeed “appalling,” but it is not inaccurate.

1. “Sharia Law, or Islamic religious law, gives Muslim men sexual rights over any woman or girl not wearing the hijab or head scarf.”

This is stating flatly what is only implied in Islamic texts, but it is not inaccurate. The Qur’an teaches that Infidel women can be lawfully taken for sexual use (cf. its allowance for a man to take “captives of the right hand,” 4:3, 4:24, 23:1-6, 33:50, 70:30). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused. And ever is Allah Forgiving and Merciful.” (33:59) The implication there is that if women do not cover themselves adequately with their outer garments, they may be abused, and that such abuse would be justified. We have seen Muslim migrants all over Europe committing mass sexual assault and rape of non-Muslim women, making it clear that at least some Muslims do indeed believe that Sharia gives them sexual rights over women who aren’t covered.

2. “Sharia Law…allows a man to marry an infant girl and consummate the marriage when she is 9.”

Let’s see what Islamic authorities have to say about this:

“Islam has no age barrier in marriage and Muslims have no apology for those who refuse to accept this” — Ishaq Akintola, professor of Islamic Eschatology and Director of Muslim Rights Concern, Nigeria

“There is no minimum marriage age for either men or women in Islamic law. The law in many countries permits girls to marry only from the age of 18. This is arbitrary legislation, not Islamic law.” — Dr. Abd Al-Hamid Al-‘Ubeidi, Iraqi expert on Islamic law

There is no minimum age for marriage and that girls can be married “even if they are in the cradle.” — Dr. Salih bin Fawzan, prominent cleric and member of Saudi Arabia’s highest religious council

“Islam does not forbid marriage of young children.” — Pakistan’s Council of Islamic Ideology

Hadiths that Muslims consider authentic record that Muhammad’s favorite wife, Aisha, was six when Muhammad wedded her and nine when he consummated the marriage:

“The Prophet wrote the (marriage contract) with Aisha while she was six years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years old and she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death)” (Bukhari 7.62.88).

Another tradition has Aisha herself recount the scene:

The Prophet engaged me when I was a girl of six (years). We went to Medina and stayed at the home of Bani-al-Harith bin Khazraj. Then I got ill and my hair fell down. Later on my hair grew (again) and my mother, Um Ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my girl friends. She called me, and I went to her, not knowing what she wanted to do to me. She caught me by the hand and made me stand at the door of the house. I was breathless then, and when my breathing became all right, she took some water and rubbed my face and head with it. Then she took me into the house. There in the house I saw some Ansari women who said, “Best wishes and Allah’s Blessing and a good luck.” Then she entrusted me to them and they prepared me (for the marriage). Unexpectedly Allah’s Apostle came to me in the forenoon and my mother handed me over to him, and at that time I was a girl of nine years of age. (Bukhari 5.58.234).

Muhammad was at this time fifty-four years old.

Marrying young girls was not all that unusual for its time, but because in Islam Muhammad is the supreme example of conduct (cf. Qur’an 33:21), he is considered exemplary in this unto today. And so in April 2011, the Bangladesh Mufti Fazlul Haque Amini declared that those trying to pass a law banning child marriage in that country were putting Muhammad in a bad light: “Banning child marriage will cause challenging the marriage of the holy prophet of Islam, [putting] the moral character of the prophet into controversy and challenge.” He added a threat: “Islam permits child marriage and it will not be tolerated if any ruler will ever try to touch this issue in the name of giving more rights to women.” The Mufti said that 200,000 jihadists were ready to sacrifice their lives for any law restricting child marriage.

Likewise the influential website Islamonline.com in December 2010 justified child marriage by invoking not only Muhammad’s example, but the Qur’an as well:

The Noble Qur’an has also mentioned the waiting period [i.e. for a divorced wife to remarry] for the wife who has not yet menstruated, saying: “And those who no longer expect menstruation among your women, if you doubt, then their period is three months, and [also for] those who have not menstruated” [Qur’an 65:4]. Since this is not negated later, we can take from this verse that it is permissible to have sexual intercourse with a prepubescent girl. The Qur’an is not like the books of jurisprudence which mention what the implications of things are, even if they are prohibited. It is true that the prophet entered into a marriage contract with A’isha when she was six years old, however he did not have sex with her until she was nine years old, according to al-Bukhari.

Other countries make Muhammad’s example the basis of their laws regarding the legal marriageable age for girls. Article 1041 of the Civil Code of the Islamic Republic of Iran states that girls can be engaged before the age of nine, and married at nine: “Marriage before puberty (nine full lunar years for girls) is prohibited. Marriage contracted before reaching puberty with the permission of the guardian is valid provided that the interests of the ward are duly observed.”

According to Amir Taheri in The Spirit of Allah: Khomeini and the Islamic Revolution (pp. 90-91), Iran’s Ayatollah Khomeini himself married a ten-year-old girl when he was twenty-eight. Khomeini called marriage to a prepubescent girl “a divine blessing,” and advised the faithful to give their own daughters away accordingly: “Do your best to ensure that your daughters do not see their first blood in your house.” When he took power in Iran, he lowered the legal marriageable age of girls to nine, in accord with Muhammad’s example.

3. “Sharia Law…requires Muslims to lie to non-Muslims to advance their faith.”

“Requires” may be a bit strong, but it certainly allows it. Qur’an 3:28 warns believers not to take unbelievers as “friends or helpers…unless you are guarding yourselves against them.” This is a foundation of the idea that believers may legitimately deceive unbelievers when under pressure. The Qur’an commentator Ibn Kathir says that the phrase “unless you are guarding yourselves against them” means that “believers who in some areas or times fear for their safety from the disbelievers” may “show friendship to the disbelievers outwardly, but never inwardly. For instance, Al-Bukhari recorded that Abu Ad-Darda’ said, ‘We smile in the face of some people although our hearts curse them.’ Al-Bukhari said that Al-Hasan said, ‘The Tuqyah [taqiyya] is allowed until the Day of Resurrection.” While many Muslim spokesmen today maintain that taqiyya is solely a Shi’ite doctrine, shunned by Sunnis, the great Islamic scholar Ignaz Goldziher points out that while it was formulated by Shi’ites, “it is accepted as legitimate by other Muslims as well, on the authority of Qur’an 3:28.” The Sunnis of Al-Qaeda practice it today.

Also, there is Muhammad’s statement, “war is deceit” (Bukhari 4.52.268). He also allowed for lying in battle and between a husband and wife (Muslim 6303). And when he gave permission to one of his followers, Muhammad bin Maslama, to murder one of his critics, Ka’b bin al-Ashraf, he also gave Muhammad bin Maslama permission to lie to Ka’b in order to lure him close enough to be killed.

And Muhammad is the “excellent example of conduct” for Muslims (Qur’an 33:21).

As for the parents’ claim that their son has been bullied because of this material, it cannot be taken at face value in light of the numerous “anti-Muslim hate crimes” that turn out to have been faked by Muslims. They must produce evidence of some kind — would eyewitness testimony from other students be too much to request? Probably. What is most likely is that the California Department of Education will take the claims of the parents and Hamas-linked CAIR at face value, without examination, and drop this material.

“Appeal filed over ‘appalling, Islamophobic’ teaching material distributed in 7th-grade social studies class,” by Deepa Bharath, Orange County Register, January 11, 2018 (thanks to Creeping Sharia):

The Council on American-Islamic Relations’ Los Angeles chapter filed an appeal this week on behalf of a Ventura County family whose son received instructional material in his seventh-grade social studies class that berated Muslims and which was taken, the group says, from an anti-Muslim website.

During a press conference Thursday morning, Jan. 11, at CAIR-LA’s Anaheim office, the boy’s parents said their son is afraid and reluctant to go to school since October because he is being bullied by his peers for being Muslim in reaction to the inaccurate statements contained in the history teacher’s instructional material.

CAIR-LA’s appeal to the California Department of Education challenges the Mesa Union School District’s determination that the teacher’s actions were not discriminatory. The school district is located in Somis, an unincorporated community in Ventura County.

District superintendent Jeff Turner declined comment. The district “continues to seek resolution of this matter,” he said in a released statement.

The material the teacher distributed contained information taken from the website billionbibles.org, which makes “inaccurate and disparaging” statements about Islam and Muslims,” said Masih Fouladi, CAIR-LA’s advocacy manager.

The sheet of paper distributed by the teacher states Sharia Law, or Islamic religious law, gives Muslim men sexual rights over any woman or girl not wearing the hijab or head scarf; allows a man to marry an infant girl and consummate the marriage when she is 9; and requires Muslims to lie to non-Muslims to advance their faith….

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: "Islamophobia", CAIR, claiming victim status, Featured, Taqiyya, War is deceit Tagged With: Azfar Quddus, CAIR-LA, California Department of Education, Carolyn Rodriguez-Quddus, Masih Fouladi


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. StellaSaidSo says

    Jan 29, 2018 at 8:11 am

    ‘Appalling, inaccurate, Islamophobic’

    Translation:

    THE TRUTH

    • mortimer says

      Jan 29, 2018 at 9:23 am

      “The (DHIMMI) agreement is also violated (A: with respect to the offender alone) if the state has stipulated that any of the following things break it, and one of the subjects does so anyway, though if the state has not stipulated that these break the agreement, then they do not; namely, if one of the subject people:
      -5- mentions something impermissible about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), or Islam.” – ‘Reliance of the Traveller’ Chapter ‘O’ 11.10.05

      “There is no indemnity obligatory for KILLING a non-Muslim (harbi) at war with Muslims.” – Reliance of the Traveller, o4.17, p.593

      Note: it is compulsory to KILL a KAFIR who speak UNFLATTERINGLY about Islam by revealing its VIOLENCE, MISOGYNY and VIGILANTISM.

      • CogitoErgoSum says

        Jan 29, 2018 at 2:05 pm

        Yes, Quran 9:29 demands a constant state of war exist between Muslims and non-Muslims until everyone on Earth is either Muslim or is paying the Jizya to the Muslims for the “dispensation” to remain a member of the “people of the Book” ……. and even then it’s not to be an easy life for those who refuse to become a Muslim.

    • Lydia Church says

      Jan 30, 2018 at 12:26 am

      Right.
      And…. it explains a lot about what is going on in Europe lately…..!!!

  2. dumbledoresasrmy says

    Jan 29, 2018 at 8:27 am

    The Muslims are claiming that their kid is being ‘bullied’.

    Possibly *some* of the other kids are acting warily around him.. and why not? Some of them will have heard about Islamic State teaching Musilm kids to cut off heads. Some of them may have heard about Muslim kids stabbing, or trying to stab, people, in Israel.

    One must also bear in mind the Muslim habit of projection.

    In all Muslim-dominated countries – e.g. Egypt, and Pakistan – non-Muslim kid who attend the state-run schools are usually mercilessly buillied, not only by their Muslim classmates but by their Muslim *teachers*. They are marked down. If the Muslim kids physically *attack* them, the Muslim teachers stand by and do nothing. Barnabas Fund’s prayer letter frequently mentions this sort of thing.

    The Muslims claim that their son is being ‘buillied’ in an Infidel school; because they project onto the Infidels what would certainly be the case, if the situation were reversed, and a non-Muslim child in a Muslim country were attending a school where most people were Muslims.

    • mortimer says

      Jan 29, 2018 at 9:24 am

      Agree with dda: “psychological projection”.

    • CRUSADER says

      Jan 29, 2018 at 6:23 pm

      Classic one finger pointing, rest of fingers pointing back toward blamer.

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 30, 2018 at 1:04 am

      There have been huge numbers of stories of Muslims bullying Infidel children.

  3. rubiconcrest says

    Jan 29, 2018 at 8:29 am

    …. and the Orange County Register’s comments section is blocked.,

  4. esther says

    Jan 29, 2018 at 8:54 am

    stupid teacher——-telling seventh grade kids (12–13 Y/O) that muslims
    can RAPE any girl not wearing a hijab is INFLAMMATORY——did it really
    happen that way? I don’t believe it

    • mortimer says

      Jan 29, 2018 at 9:28 am

      Koran 33.59 is clear: “‘O Prophet, direct thy wives and daughters and the women of the believers that they should pull down their outer cloaks from their heads over their faces. This will make it possible for them to be IDENTIFIED (as Muslims) so that they will not be MOLESTED.’

      This is the DIRECT WORDS OF ALLAH. Allah is implying that Muslim men have a RIGHT to ‘MOLEST’ uncovered women.

      Sharia law has no punishment for a Muslim who rapes an infidel.

    • Michael Copeland says

      Jan 29, 2018 at 9:52 am

      “Any woman without a headscarf is asking to be raped”,
      Imam Shahi Mehdi, Denmark

      “It is their punishment for disbelief”
      Maulana Bulandshahri

    • Screeminmeeme says

      Jan 30, 2018 at 6:27 pm

      The teacher did something that every other teacher in America should be doing: Informing the kids about an enemy which seeks to destroy our country. The facts about Islam on the flier were accurate and age appropriate for 12-13 yr olds.

      The truth is the enemy of Islam. We can’t conquer an enemy we don’t know or are unwilling to acknowledge.

  5. Cameron says

    Jan 29, 2018 at 9:02 am

    Muslims being offended at accurate descriptions of the content of their creed. It reminds me very much of Muslims being offended at billboards describing “the perfect man” and listing some of the worst behaviours any human has ever been recorded having conducted according to their own histories.

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 30, 2018 at 1:06 am

      There is even a term for this, Cameron–“Ghiba”.

      “Ghiba” is often translated as “slander”, but this isn’t really accurate. It just means anything Muslims don’t want to have said about them, even if it is true.

  6. Janice says

    Jan 29, 2018 at 9:30 am

    When this goes into court the teacher needs to take the Quran and show what it says on these subjects. Put a CAIR representative on the stand and have him deny each one and then ask him to explain away the evidence. Of course there is no guarentee that he won’t lie about it. Then point out where Muslims are admonished to lie to further Islam.

  7. Salah says

    Jan 29, 2018 at 9:33 am

    “…Masih Fouladi, CAIR-LA’s advocacy manager.”

    Masih is a coptic name. Shame on you Mr Fouladi. Shame on you.

    The Perfect Man of Islam
    http://crossmuslims.blogspot.ca/2010/12/perfect-man-of-islam.html

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 30, 2018 at 1:08 am

      I’d missed that, Salah. Yes, this is disgusting–either a dhimmi or a convert to Islam.

      And good to see you posting again.

      • Salah says

        Jan 30, 2018 at 8:22 am

        Thanks, GI.
        No, he’s neither a dhimmi nor a convert because he kept his name Masih, which means Christ. He is simply making a lot of money selling out his country.
        According to the verse below, Muhammad used to bribe non-muslim tribal leaders in order to advance islam. Today, his followers are using the same tactic (i.e petro-dollars.)

        Click on the link below then click on “Errors” and read about the context.

        http://www.thequran.com/Read/Verse/9/60/60/22

  8. roberta says

    Jan 29, 2018 at 9:40 am

    What really caught my attention is that this was a teacher in California. 7th grade does seem to young for hearing such things (even though true), but the issue is pressing. I gotta
    give this teacher props for knowing a sh-t storm was coming and walking right into the path.

    • Stacy Girl says

      Jan 29, 2018 at 2:37 pm

      Good catch. They teach much more to students this age and under regarding sexual matters. Those with kids will agree.

  9. mortimer says

    Jan 29, 2018 at 9:41 am

    All over the Muslim world, there is a LOVE JIHAD. Non-Muslim girls and women are kidnapped, raped, humiliated, held incommunicado, forcibly converted to Islam, forcibly ‘married’ and/or held for ransom—and sometimes killed even after the ransom is received— this is rape, robbery and plundered with lots of taqiyya on the side.

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 30, 2018 at 1:09 am

      Only Muslims would consider this “love”.

  10. billybob says

    Jan 29, 2018 at 9:41 am

    Islamic texts such as the Quran and Hadiths are “problematic” to say the least. This causes no end of grief for Muslims, who refuse to acknowledge the problems in their texts. There is no end to the convolutions, rationalizations, and outright lies they employ to defend their faith. Furthermore, this whole “Islamophobia” industry is required as an attempt to stop people from criticizing Islam. Discrimination against Muslims is almost entirely due to these texts and the Muslims who follow them too faithfully.

    We have many religions where people dress strangely, or hold bizarre beliefs, such as the Amish or Scientology and even the Mormons. Yet, these groups suffer little discrimination in comparison to Muslims.

    No wonder there are strong blasphemy laws in Islamic countries to stop people from criticizing Islam. This religion cannot stand up to logical examination. Even democratic nations require special legislation (such as Bill M103 in Canada) to stop criticism. Muslims need to acknowledge and take responsibility for their texts. It is time for them to stop blaming others for the problems within their religion.

    • CRUSADER says

      Jan 29, 2018 at 6:27 pm

      *******************
      Why not ACT?

      Form an action team in your area based on :

      http://www.ACTforAmerica.org/Issues

      *************************************************

      • eduardo odraude says

        Jan 30, 2018 at 4:02 am

        I believe there is a sister organization ACTforCanada, too.

    • Screeminmeeme says

      Jan 30, 2018 at 6:45 pm

      Discrimination? You’ve gotta be kidding.

      1. The ‘Islamophobia’ strategy is working and the evidence for its success is seen daily on MSM, in the justice system, in academia, in print reporting, and in the relentless, vicious attacks on those who inform others of the facts about Islam.

      This strategy is not just for those who ‘criticize’ Islam, but more often, for those who simply and benignly speak and write about Islam, drawing from its authoritative texts and scholars.

      2. I don’t know where you got your information, but the victim narrative used so often and successfully by Muslims is paying off. Many of the reports of discrimination against Muslims have been proven false, and are indications of the shameless deceit used against ‘infidels’. The brainwashing achieved by propaganda-spewing Islamic apologists (Muslim and non-Muslim) and the silencing of truth-tellers thru ‘hate-speech’ laws has been impressive.

  11. infidel numero uno says

    Jan 29, 2018 at 10:00 am

    Too bad the “profit” was not aborted or still borne prior to foisting his evil on the Earth.

  12. Tom says

    Jan 29, 2018 at 10:08 am

    The plan to demonize any criticism of Islam has been ratcheted up.

    Previously it was only used to try and shame those who criticized Islam when it seemed obvious that they were using rumour and innuendo and blatent hate speech.

    After this approach became successful without any backlash, the Islamic groups then started their campaign against the ones like Robert Spencer who were trying to educate the kuffar. There was no substantial pushback from anyone and growing support from liberals and progessives, so they decided to push the envelope and go after those individuals who stood up and told the truth.

    Next step is to enshrine ANY criticism, whether valid or not, of Islam into law. As has been done in Sweden and recently a 90 year old man has been charged for criticism of Islam.

    We have to start pushing back at those who claim Islamaphobia when the truth is being told. If we don’t act NOW to stop groups like CAIR and the Muslim Brotherhood from influencing our governments with their false claims of Islamaphobia, we will ALL be either subjugated to Islam or criminalized for speaking out.

    It’s history repeating itself yet again
    “First they came for the communists, and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a communist,
    Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a trade unionist,
    Then they came for the jews, and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a jew,
    Then they came for me, and there was no one left to speak for me.”

    • Shmoovie says

      Jan 29, 2018 at 11:24 am

      Tom wrote: “We have to start pushing back at those who claim Islamaphobia when the truth is being told.” Agreed +10.
      So maddening when the hard lefty you’re speaking with has never heard of the things you’re saying and just shakes his head at you. They only know that you’re a ‘phobe– THAT’S one word they’re sure to have heard.

    • StellaSaidSo says

      Jan 29, 2018 at 1:38 pm

      Good points, Tom. Especially about the need to push back against accusations of ‘Islamophobia’.

    • vlamp says

      Jan 29, 2018 at 9:12 pm

      i love your last paragraph..im stealing it to share.

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 30, 2018 at 1:13 am

      Fine post.

  13. Jaladhi says

    Jan 29, 2018 at 10:27 am

    Truth is always Islamophobic to Muslims! By their definition even Sira, and hadiths are Islamophobic!! Maybe we should tell them since they cannot recognize Islamophobia in Islamic texts!!

  14. Shmoovie says

    Jan 29, 2018 at 10:32 am

    CAIR is indignant that a teacher dared question the unquestionable; that this teacher chose some truth (differing from the majority of his peers) and didn’t edit the subject into anything other than a flattering, respectful light. The teacher might have used other sites for different wording but wouldn’t the end message (‘islam has some serious, troubling issues– here is a taste’) be the same? Imo these students are old enough. They might even do some research into CAIR itself…
    Agree with the commenter who wrote the teacher deserves props for stepping into this ‘storm’. If CAIR can’t bear even this amount of light hitting islam, well, that’s one hypersensitive cockroach.

  15. Buraq says

    Jan 29, 2018 at 11:32 am

    Well, infants don’t wear hijabs, so they’re just asking for it, yeah? And as any adherent of this twisted creed will tell you, it’s not a man’s fault that his libido snaps the leash at the sight of a naked woman, girl, or even a baby!

    Filthy clowns! (I hope you got all that, Ibrahim itace Muhamed)

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 30, 2018 at 1:14 am

      Ibrahim itace muhammed has said that Infidels can be raped and kept as sex slaves in Jihad.

  16. RichardL says

    Jan 29, 2018 at 12:31 pm

    Muslim congressman Keith Ellison just posted on Twitter a photo of him holding an Antifa guide and his caption was a quote from the koran: how to strike fear into the heart of Donald Trump. A good little terrorist, the congressman.

    https://www.dailywire.com/news/26464/controversial-deputy-dnc-chair-keith-ellison-jeremy-frankel

  17. Z says

    Jan 29, 2018 at 12:44 pm

    You know when I was in high school I read this informative book that told me that women were second class citizens in Afghanistan and it was true

  18. Ren says

    Jan 29, 2018 at 1:05 pm

    Haha. CAIR is protesting their own religion. This proves muslims are abhorring the conduct of their phony prophet Muhammad. Yet they keep adhering to the teachings of Muhammad. This shows how stupid and crazy muslims are.

  19. CRUSADER says

    Jan 29, 2018 at 1:20 pm

    ACT for America
    had been working on school text books in recent years….

    It is an important topic…

    TNT (Truth ‘n Textbooks)

    Changes at Truth in Textbooks (Formerly Known as Truth in Texas …
    https://truthintexastextbooks.com/changes-at-truth-in-texas-textbooks/

    Jan 17, 2016 – Truth in Textbooks (TNT), formerly known as Truth in Texas Textbooks (TTT) is joining with Textbook Alert to form the most extensive teams of social studies … TNT will also provide experts to assist in helping navigate working with schools, school boards and other educational entities to affect change.

  20. Cheer Bear Girl says

    Jan 29, 2018 at 2:16 pm

    Well at least these kids won’t be ignorant about Islam. We need to educate everyone we know about this dangerous cult. In Islam men can marry little girls even in their infancy. How appalling.

  21. Norger says

    Jan 29, 2018 at 5:20 pm

    This is “slander” of Islam, in the Islamic sense of the word “slander;” i. e. a truthful statement about Islam, but one which portrays Islam in an unfavorable light. Truth is Islamophobic.

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 30, 2018 at 1:16 am

      +1

  22. Indiana Tom says

    Jan 29, 2018 at 7:10 pm

    3. “Sharia Law…requires Muslims to lie to non-Muslims to advance their faith.” Depending on how you spin the Muslim texts, it would be the duty of Muslims to advance the faith regardless of method.

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 30, 2018 at 1:16 am

      True, Tom–but this is still pretty accurate.

  23. Indiana Tom says

    Jan 29, 2018 at 7:15 pm

    The material the teacher distributed contained information taken from the website billionbibles.org, which makes “inaccurate and disparaging” statements about Islam and Muslims,” said Masih Fouladi, CAIR-LA’s advocacy manager.
    You know that the B-24 is over the target area by the amount of FLAK bursting around it.

    • Norger says

      Jan 30, 2018 at 1:59 pm

      Self-evidently “disparaging,” yes. “Inaccurate,” most definitely not. But it’s remarkable how the MSM takes statements like this at face value. They don’t dare even “Google”’anything about Islam.

  24. gravenimage says

    Jan 29, 2018 at 9:40 pm

    Los Angeles: Hamas-linked CAIR protests “appalling, Islamophobic” accurate 7th grade material on Islam
    ……………………..

    Of course, CAIR will never say in what way this is appalling–they just hope we assume that it is inaccurate.

    I’m actually amazed anything this accurate got through the Los Angeles schools.

  25. Infidel says

    Jan 30, 2018 at 12:07 am

    Examples of One sided things regarding Muslims in India (taken from reader comments): 1> U should take all efforts to understand Islam but we will not make any attempt to understand your religion 2> U have to always be secular to us and treat us more than equals but we have the full rights to discriminate against U. 3> We can riot and do violence against U anytime but U have to always appease us and bow down to us. 4> We have the full rights to slaughter cows and eat beef right in front of Ur temples but U should not bring pork anywhere in our sights and offend us. 5> We can make full fun of Ur Gods and insult them all the time but U cannot even say even one harmless jokes against Allah and Prophet. 6> We can marry and even abduct Ur girls but U DARE NOT even look at our girls. 7> We have full rights to come and go into Ur areas and live there and buy property and businesses but U DARE NOT even walk thru our areas 8> We will wail loudly 5 times even in hardcore Hindu areas thru loudspeakers but Ur temples cannot exist in our areas leave alone do Pujas and ring bells 9> Our political leaders will only speak of Islam and Sharia and NO DEVELOPMENT but Ur leaders shall DARE NOT speak about Hinduism and speak only on development. 10> We will not follow Uniform Civil Code but U Hindus dare not make Hindu laws for Urself.

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 30, 2018 at 1:18 am

      This is basically what Muslims *always* do.

    • LeftisruiningCanada says

      Jan 30, 2018 at 9:52 pm

      Sounds like a how to guide on being a bumhole.

  26. Infidel says

    Jan 30, 2018 at 2:26 am

    MUST READ ARTICLE BY MELANIE PHILLIPS..
    Cowardice allows Muslim Extremism

    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/cowardice-allows-muslim-extremism-to-thrive-3fffl0btm

    • Infidel says

      Jan 30, 2018 at 2:49 am

      As I have been saying for long: THE MORE TOLERANT AND LIBERAL THE HOST SOCIETY, THE MORE VIRULENT AND VIOLENT THE ISLAMIC PARASITE

  27. John says

    Jan 30, 2018 at 8:50 pm

    Islam In millions upon millions of cases is the religion of backward primitive people who live in the stone age compared to westerners who live in the space age…….!!°°°°°

  28. Ian H says

    Jan 31, 2018 at 12:59 am

    There is very little in the Bible that specifically addresses the question of at what age people can marry. Islam has the problem of being ridiculously specific and thereby locking its adherents into the legal practices of the dark ages.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Crusades Were Right on Canadian Mental Health Association studies Muslim women’s mental health due to ‘discrimination’ and ‘hate crimes’
  • Crusades Were Right on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • curious george on Israel At A Crossroads?
  • Crusades Were Right on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • William Garrison on The Fantasy Islam of Rice University’s Craig Considine (Part 3)

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.