Mohamed Noor, the Muslim cop in Minneapolis who shot an unarmed woman, Justine Damond, had been fast-tracked onto the force so that the Minneapolis police could showcase their “diversity.” Now it looks as if the Portland, Maine Police Department was trying to do the same thing with Zahra Munye Abu. After the shooting of Justine Damond, there should have been a searching reevaluation of the wisdom of hiring police officers based on their religion and ethnicity rather than their merit. But of course there was not. And so Muslim police officers keep being hired because they’re Muslim, not because they’re competent police officers, and here we are again.
“Portland police officer whose hiring made history is put on leave after arrest in Massachusetts,” by Matt Byrne, Press Herald, January 16, 2018 (thanks to the Geller Report):
A 24-year-old Portland police officer has been charged with five misdemeanors, including assault and battery, after being arrested Saturday night at a concert venue in Worcester, Massachusetts.
Worcester police said Zahra Munye Abu, of Portland, is also facing charges of trespassing, resisting arrest, disorderly conduct and disturbing the peace.
Abu caused a disturbance while attending a Ja Rule and Ashanti concert at the Palladium Nightclub on Main Street, said Worcester police Sgt. Kerry F. Hazelhurst.
“The nightclub was hosting several live musical acts,” Hazelhurst said in an email. “She was (given) several opportunities to leave and refused. Eventually she was placed under arrest.”
Worcester police would not provide more details about the incident, and members of Abu’s family declined to comment when contacted by phone at their home.
Portland Police Chief Michael Sauschuck said Abu has been placed on administrative leave with pay pending a review of the matter….
Abu is a high-profile member of the Portland police force because she is the first member of Maine’s Somali immigrant community to become a police officer in Maine.
She was born to Somali parents in a Kenyan refugee camp and has lived in Portland since she was 2 years old. She graduated from Deering High School in Portland and studied criminal justice and women-and-gender issues at the University of Southern Maine.
If convicted, Abu faces a maximum penalty of up to 2½ years in a county jail on the assault and battery and the resisting arrest charges. Each of the other charges include less severe maximum penalties.
MFritz says
Well, too much “diversity” will kill you.
Andy says
Political correctness has to STOP!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMl4kIxw-jo
Political Correctness Gone Mad
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7uCyBVD-9U
Andy says
FUISLAM
The enemy is Islam!!!! Stupid!!!
Dave says
You can dress ’em but you cannot take ’em anywhere.
Westman says
If convicted, “…Abu faces a maximum penalty of up to 2½ years in a county jail on the assault and battery and the resisting arrest charges.”
What is that image silhouetted in the moonlight? A flying pig?
StellaSaidSo says
I doubt she will serve a single day in prison.
Nor will Noor. There will be no justice for Justine. How many victims of violent crimes committed by Muslims ever get justice? Right now, I can’t think of a single one.
eagle says
CAIR will give her a get free pass, wait and see. This is where the Muslim Brotherhood listed its front groups in the U.S.. Note that prominent organizations like CAIR, ISNA, ICNA and others are named here. Entire Document can be read here: http://www.investigativeproject.org/documents/misc/20.pdf The first half is Arabic and second half is the English Translation. Let’s get some legislation started and ban and jail these anti-American organizations.
b.a. freeman says
*thank* U, eagle!
J D S says
Wait a minute….what is this Muslim doing in a concert in a night club,??? Why isn’t the Muslim community punishing him. Doesn’t
Islam condemned this.
Police forces and military forces, worldwide, are jumping the gun on allowing them entry into their organizations .Even background checks may not be enough. BE CAREFUL you have the interest and safety of the public in your hands.
gravenimage says
Zahra Munye Abu is a Muslimah, which makes going to a concert even less permissible. But Muslims flout the strictures of Islam in the West all the time. I don’t mind this–its their rarely giving up their violence and demands for supremacy that are the problems.
Johnny Cuyana says
The notion of diversity — in the presence of national values, clearly defined — is, at the least, redundant, and worse than worthless; where, this notion, more precisely, adherence to this notion, is destructive to the nation and the culture; where, such adherence could lead to national and cultural suicide.
Johnny Cuyana says
In my haste [during my lunch hour] and in full recognition of my need for an editor, I submit my first —
and hopefully, last — edited version of my original post:
The notion of diversity — in the presence of national values, clearly defined, such as here in the USA and other western Nations — is, at the least, redundant and superfluous, and very possibly worse than worthless; where, this notion, more precisely, the prioritization of the adherence to this notion [over those of the existing national values], is destructive to the nation and the culture; where, such adherence could lead to national and cultural suicide.
CRUSADER says
huh?
Peter says
He said
I’m hungry and diversity is bad
Johnny Cuyana says
PART 1 of 2: Crusader, thank you for reading and responding to my posts. My apologies for delayed counter-response; too many work and family obligations.
Nonetheless, here is my shortest variant response:
Adherence to diversity, at the expense of foundational Western values, is evil and corrosive; where, strict adherence to diversity in the longer run, most likely, will lead to national destruction. [Foundational Western values are those derived primarily from Judeo-Christian ethics and natural law.]
And, Crusader, here is my longer variant response:
[a] Foundational values are what define and maintain the existence of any nation and its culture; otherwise, without such values, why have a nation; where, if there are no defining values — or, where they have been rejected and are no longer maintained — just get rid of any and all physical and administrative frontiers … and let the free-for-all begin;
[b] A primary USA foundational value, for each and every legal citizen, is the recognition of the endowment, by our Creator, of “certain inalienable rights” … fairly and equally;
[c] This value — if adhered to, in accordance with the law of the people — ensures that irrespective of any “diversity” any and all legal citizens can do as they please in order to pursue their happiness;
[d] Therefore, if we legal USA citizens, prioritize our foundational values, the notion of diversity, in any positive sense, is irrelevant totally; where it is redundant because the notion of diversity is exceeding what is normal, i.e., that which is already addressed implicitly within this foundational value; and, where it is superfluous because the notion of diversity is exceeding what is necessary, i.e., again, that which is already addressed implicitly within this foundational value.
IOW, if one adheres to our foundational values, one is already permitted to go ahead, and be as diverse as one wants; where diversity is your business and neither that of the govt nor of the people. [Famously, MLK Jr had it right: the content of character, i.e., one’s moral compass, one’s values, is much more important than the diversity of one’s skin color, or one’s native language, or style of dress or, etc];
[e] But, if, conversely, diversity is prioritized — and, by definition, such would be at the expense of foundational values — the notion of inalienable rights, for one and all would be vacated; where, IOW, society may want diversity, but, no longer would society have all those universal inalienable rights … because such rights, necessarily, would have been sacrificed for the sake of diversity; where, as usual, attempts to serve two conflicting masters is one of humanity’s everlasting fool’s errands.
[f] So, if one is advocating for the disregard, or rejection, of foundational values and the laws derived therefrom — IOW, advocating for breaking of the peoples’ laws — then one is advocating for the erosion of the foundation of the nation and the culture; and, taken to the logical conclusion, should such happen, it would lead to the complete destruction of that nation and culture. In our present context, prioritization of PC diversity is progressing, bit by bit, in front of our very eyes, such as is the case of this blog article subject; where many Americans, for whatever reasons, are forsaking our values … to a point where, if taken to the logical conclusion, could lead to our national suicide.
As a mental exercise, think about the type of govt which would be required, where universal inalienable rights were to be de-prioritized and, then, replaced by the demand for diversity; further, think about what types of laws would be needed to enforce this diversity … let alone the question on what criteria such laws would be based. Who and how does one decide what is “diverse” … and then use a gun to enforce the same? This is the age-old technique of “divide and conquer”, based purely on political preferences, made legal. How could national and cultural destruction NOT ensue? [Actually, we do not need to conduct this mental exercise, because such diversity “laws” — much to the chagrin of many of those who love freedom — already exists in more than several institutions within our national and local societies].
Johnny Cuyana says
PART 2 of 2: Note: for my one vote, I support the hypothesis that this widespread forsaking of our foundational American values — by way too many of both younger and older legal citizens — is because of our collective ignorance; where this ignorance is, although, ultimately the shortcoming of each and every FREEBORN citizen — maintaining freedom requires effort by all legal citizens — a trend largely the result of decades of the successful insidious planned brainwashing by the anti-freedom globalist Democratic [and RINO] leadership; where, of course, this includes powerful interests on the international level, where such interests are quite keen to “lend a hand” to national deterioration of our values. And, no, I do not believe that, for freedom-loving legal citizens, the fight against such is a hopeless endeavor; actually, I believe very much like R. Spencer, that, in the longer run, the forces of truth and light — essentially the support and promotion of American values — will win out; but, most likely, this great fight, which began at the inception of humanity, will continue much beyond the foreseeable future.
Note: the above hypothesis, although it is one which I support strongly, is not mine alone, where definitely I am not — thank God — the originator; there are many fellow advocate legal citizens. However, if you are so inclined, I propose a simple exercise, to test whether this hypothesis has some merit. This test could be given, quickly and informally, to one or many individuals; where, keeping to the spirit of the exercise, these individuals should be legal citizens with at least a HS education: ask these citizens to list our primary foundational American values, and, better yet, have any idea how, these days, such values are used — or, NOT used — to guide our national, state and local legislation, enforcement and adjudication processes.
[There are five such foundational values, they are distinct but they are not all unique to the USA. There are other American values, of course, but ALL these others can be traced from these foundational five. If your experience will be similar to mine, I would be very surprised if more than half the “players” know the answer. OTOH, I would NOT be at all surprised if the great majority of these players do NOT know the answer. From these results, one may draw your own conclusions.]
The overall point is: to me, what is so remarkable is that many Americans — including so many politicians — and, in particular, many of those which hate, or want to transform fundamentally, our nation and culture, are NOT aware of our foundational American values; where, oh yes, they know the words, but to them they are JUST words, where, in actuality, they DO NOT understand and appreciate such in the proper context; at least, to where they are able, in their ignorance, to argue them. Even more frustrating is the FACT that many such legal and illegal citizens cannot articulate which foundational values, if not those of the USA, they would advocate alternatively.
Think about it [as I do on a regular basis]: many Americans, in this nation of such great bounty and liberty, do not understand nor appreciate THEIR OWN foundational values; yet, many of them, in their “grand wisdom”, i.e., the wisdom of fools, are so willing to argue against the policies, if not the very existence, of our nation … a nation, with many flaws, yet, in comparison with ALL the others, is leading the world is so many positive ways.
In closing, for those who may want to maintain a free society for one and all, I advocate that when placing people — e.g., local officials [such as on a school board], first responders, elected official and etc — into positions of authority, particularly govt positions, where such would wield immense power over ALL citizens, one must DISREGARD TOTALLY any and all notions of diversity — diversity is your private business — and, instead, demand adherence to foundational American values. Adherence to diversity, at the expense of adherence to foundational values, most likely, will lead to internal division, which, in turn, will lead to national and cultural damage and very possibly to total national destruction [which would be a form of national suicide].
gravenimage says
It depends on what form this “diversity” takes. With Muslims it is never a good idea.
R Russell says
The weaponing of the enemy and teaching them tactics.
Wonderful
gravenimage says
Yes–this is nuts.
isabella van der Wetshuizen says
What is a Somali doing in Portland
She should be home or in some other wonderful Muslim country
mortimer says
Diversity of her CRIMES.
Shmoovie says
But… she’s lived in Portland since age two! Where is CAIR?
The LACK of respect for the law these officers have shown should disqualify them from further connection to LE, but they’re ‘historic’ hires.
(Didn’t Noor intimidate his abused wife, by using the fact that he was about to join the police force? Might have been another case; the story vanished from news so quickly and it seems a no-no to mention it now.)
The Political Oracle says
If she was hired based on religion, it was an act of discrimination because another well qualified applicant could have been given that position. Portland police must explain.
gravenimage says
Maine: Muslim police officer put on leave, charged with five misdemeanors, including assault and battery
…………………
Very ugly–but this should not surprise.
Mark says
hey Lucy! ju got a lot of explaining to do….in a night club?
11B40 says
Greetings:
Kuffars should feel themselves subdued.
Freedom says
There is a huge ongoing violent crime wave caused by Somali muslim refugee youth in the state of Victoria in Australia.
Extremely violent home invasion, smash and grabs on jewelry stores in the main streets of Melbourne in broad daylight.
Gangs of Somali youths in the dozens attacking innocent shoppers in malls and on the streets. Bashing of police and emergency services workers.
And who does the Somali community blame for this violent behavior.
Do they blame the drip feed hatred of infidels that is there from their infancy or the obvious violence that results from the adherence to metronomic verses of hatred in the Qur’an?
Of cause not?
They blame the non-muslim community’s view of Somali muslims as being violent as the actual cause of their violence !
Sound familiar?
Meanwhile the obsequious politicians and police hierarchy are falling over each other to please these violent thugs.
Just another micro example of the global roll over and expose your belly syndrome that the obsequious Western world has allowed themselves to become.
CRUSADER says
Seems as though Somalia should be put on the Travel Ban list?
CRUSADER says
Is there a 2nd Amendment there in OZ / DownUnder ?
Freedom says
No we don’t have an equivalent to your 2nd Amendment.
We have very restrictive and controlled gun ownership laws.
The only time we can bear arms is when we’re wearing a T-shirt.
LeftisruiningCanada says
If islam has it’s way, that won’t last so long either.
David says
WTF is going on with Law Enforcement? It is not being enforced, so it is not fit for purpose…. Orders from above?What is behind all this? I am baffled.
lebel says
What does this have to do with Jihad? nothing
Its the weekly person-with-muslim-name-alleged-to-have-done-something-wrong thread
LeftisruiningCanada says
What do you think we think “jihad’ means lebel?
lebel says
“attending a Ja Rule and Ashanti concert ” this is fully in line with Koranic injunctions
LeftisruiningCanada says
About as halal as beering up in a strip club before heading out for a bit of hijacked airline skyscraper demolition, but it’s not as simple as that is it
gravenimage says
Spot on.
CRUSADER says
It might be “bigoted” to have any opinion to express on this matter, folks.
According to the Pyramid of White Supremacy (recommend you look that one up!)…..
White Supremacy Pyramid —
— (better not trust a white person / aka “haole” or “honky”)
Image result for pyramid of white supremacy
Even the Muslims are getting into this act:
بوكيبلينكي on Twitter:
“Take a look at the pyramid of white supremacy and the stages of fascisc https://t.co/45A1GNlaUy”
(Not that it is recommended to link on to the above Twitter suggestion….
This is just a demonstration / illustration of what is being peddled by LEFTISM)
LeftisruiningCanada says
Quite the projection spectacle isn’t it!
They are right though, “genocides are always planned”.
Islam has been planning the eradication of all non muslims for nearly 1400 years.
ed says
Diversity Is working wonders for the EU and England .
David says
Perhaps it should be Die-versity
LeftisruiningCanada says
Diversity = Divestiture
paul budrunas says
This is a sidenote to Johnny Cuyana’s post where he says that “adherence (to diversity) could lead to national and cultural suicide”. As sure as I’m pecking this out, it absolutely will lead to national and cultural suicide…see Britain, Germany, France experiences,,,they are far gone Great idea, let’s do the same dumbass things here!
Sarah says
I have never seen a Muslim female Police Officer in my country. Maybe Muslim male Police Officers, but I haven’t recognized the tell-tale beards of the devout Muslims, so I wouldn’t know for sure.
Frankly, if I had some dipshit in a regulation hijab try to order me around, it’d be worth getting hauled down for a talking to at the station, just to defy her. I’ve no respect for anyone who follows that ideology, I certainly have no interest in listening to the orders of one.
WPM says
Trouble is if you defy her ,her religion say she could and should kill you as a non -Moslem and the police officer is armed.
J D S says
Wait a minute….what is this Muslim doing at a concert in a night club,??? Why isn’t the Muslim community punishing her Doesn’t
Islam condemned this Muslims being in nightclubs and converts?
Police forces and military forces, worldwide, are jumping the gun on allowing them entry into their organizations. Even background checks may not be enough. BE CAREFUL you have the interest and safety of the public in your hands.
TassieR says
The Noor case clearly demonstrates that now, in the lefties-infested states, any blacks (be they Somalies or not, Muslims or not) are permitted to murder innocent white women – is it the last stage of their Affirmative Action or just the next one?
infidel says
What charming people these Somalians are!! VOW!!
p bay says
Libtardss use them because of “enemy of my enemy”
tgusa says
Go ahead and hire them US police but don’t come whining to anyone after they decide to blow up your building with all your friends in it.