There is a group called Resisting Hate that can be found on Twitter and Facebook and other social media platforms. It was co-founded by a woman named Roanna Carleton-Taylor, who has had a relationship with the influential British “anti-hate” group TellMama that stretches back for quite some time. On 30th September 2016, TellMama tweeted out a blog written by a @bored_rose (Roanna) about how Twitter wasn’t “tackling hate speech” properly. You’ll get a clearer idea of what TellMama and Roanna think of as being “hate speech” by the time you get to the bottom of this article.
Resisting Hate. What a good idea. How would a person go about resisting hate? I would imagine it would include engaging in dialogue, having open discourse and an exchange of ideas, all leading to some negotiated centre-ground from which everyone could operate without fear and from where each person could freely express their opinions without being shouted down as a “racist” or “bigot.” That would be a good start. Let’s listen to each other and let’s try to find a compromise, let’s find out what unites rather than divides us. What are our problems and what are we opposed to? Let’s figure it all out and be friends. None of those options seem to be in @ResistingHate’s narrative, however.
Roanna Carleton-Taylor (co-founder) is one of the most hateful people on the Internet. She has tweeted out her full support for a hard-line troll called Joker (or variant spellings thereof, a man so hateful that his accounts are constantly being suspended as soon as he makes them, and this has been going on for at least a four-year period on Twitter). She has gone so far as to publicly state that she will NEVER reveal his identity because he is such a good friend of hers (Nov 13, 2017).
Loyalty to one’s friends is a good thing. Absolutely. But there are a trio of people on Twitter that Roanna is best mates with. Joker, Monkey (username is generally a variant spelling on Begs_Ali), and Lazarus (username always with a reference to the moon). Joker likes to call people “faggots” and “white spastics” and “n-ggers” or “nigs,” and he likes to tell people he is a pharmacist who can access people’s private information which he posts online. He posts pictures of his NHS card and patients’ medical records. He also says he likes to “f-ck with white people’s medication” (racism), and that he’s going to “cut up white faglets” and throw them off scaffolding (homophobia). He threatened to visit a trans woman’s home and f-ck her up (transphobia). The Monkey character says she sends people’s details to ISIS and she says that young white girls who were raped by Muslim men were “sucking c-ck for cider and fags.” The Lazarus account is simply not worth talking about. You’d lose brain cells trying to debate with him the man is that moronic.
Why would a group called “ResistingHate” support the three biggest haters on Twitter? Joker, Monkey and Lazarus don’t simply name-call on Twitter. They spend their (funded?) time “doxxing” people, portraying people as racists and attempting to lose people their jobs and make them unemployable. The trio post people’s home addresses online, as well as posting children’s pictures, parents’ photographs, medical history and anything else they can get their hands on, all in a bid to discredit a person.
Roanna, very un-ironically, was short-listed last year for a “Community Volunteer Upstander Award” award by a group of organizations called #no2h8. The people handing out the awards clearly didn’t do their homework. Roanna is not for discourse at all. She’s aligned with the majority of hard-left groups on Twitter. If she finds someone she feels guilty of “wrong-think,” then she puts out the command for everyone to mass-report the person as being spam or hacked. In this way, Roanna gets people’s accounts shut down. No one has any chance to defend themselves, and Roanna gets to bully her way through Twitter, and she gets to decide who has a platform and who doesn’t. She proudly, very recently, posted an article written by herself about why doxxing and ruining people’s lives is necessary. Twitter quickly removed it. Seems not everyone is in agreement with Roanna’s admitted illegal methods of resisting hatred.
https://resistinghate.org/d0xing-fascists-is-necessary/
Her relations with the Twitter accounts of Joker, Monkey and Lazarus are even more puzzling in light of the organisations that comprise the #No2H8 assembly. TellMama are involved (both Roanna’s friends threaten to send people’s details to ISIS and throw gays off buildings – is this helping Islamic relations in the UK?), as are Trans Media Watch (look at the screenshot below of Roanna referring to a trans woman as being an “it”), Stonewall (remember Roanna’s good mate Joker’s favourite word is “faggot”), Show Racism The Red Card (“n-gger” is another of Roanna’s friend’s favourite words), and other organisations/charities that sponsored and hosted the event all claim to want to raise awareness against hatred and all kinds of bigotry, yet Roanna is good mates online with the biggest homophobes and racists, and has never attempted to “stop their hate,” get them offline, or report them to the police. Instead, she and her moronic minions are targeting Katie Hopkins. Roanna’s friend, Monkey, likes to call every one a “mong” (the n-word for people with learning difficulties, and yet a mental health charity called Wandsworth and Westminster Mind are also involved in nominating people for these awards). Monkey proudly declared the other week that her new word to insult people is “flid” – thalidomide.
Roanna cites her hero, a Dr. Kurdy (quoted by TellMama – the group who lied about “hate crimes” in order to continue obtaining their governmental funding by filing mean tweets as being hate crimes). Dr. Kurdy was stabbed in the neck by a homeless man as he was entering a mosque, and he says “I forgive because I have to listen to why people hate in order to talk with them.” I find it most bizarre that Roanna Carleton-Taylor, whilst citing a hero’s ethos, isn’t willing to emulate it. She doesn’t listen to people to understand why anyone hates, she simply sounds out her Twitter bugle and has anyone whose opinions don’t agree with hers shut down. There’s no way forward from this type of hatred and intolerance.
If enough people mass-report you on Twitter for being spam or for targeted harassment, whether you are guilty of it or not, your account will be suspended. Resisting Hate put out posts telling their followers “you know what to do,” whilst linking to the “offending” person who has an opinion different from their own. They haven’t reported the Joker account for wanting to kill “faggots”; they haven’t reported Monkey for threatening to pass details on to ISIS (or for using the words mong and flid), and they haven’t reported Lazarus for threatening violence (he drove up to a man’s house one day and then drove off even faster when he saw he was no match for the man who came out of his house to confront him). Resisting Hate actively supports, engages with, and protects these accounts. Their latest recruit is a failed Scottish ex-soldier, a Muslim convert who, drunk one night, sent threatening texts to another mosque member telling him that he was going to “kill unbelievables” (sic). The police looked through his computer and decided he was an idiot who is no threat to anyone. His name is Alexander Tiffin. The mistake he made was that when you googled his name, you could click on one picture and it took you straight to his Resisting Hate Twitter account, which was called @lawlesstiger_RH. As soon as it was pointed out who he was, he deleted his Twitter account. Why would he do this if Resisting Hate are so noble? Do they have something to hide?
This all leaves me wondering what kind of hate Resisting Hate are resisting. They seem to be creating and supporting hatred by encouraging racism, transphobia, homophobia and bigotry and hatred towards anyone with a mental health problem or a physical disability, and by trying to doxx people in order to make them unemployable if the person’s opinion doesn’t agree with their own. Roanna was recently engaged in a “debate” with a slightly center-right trans person. Roanna dehumanized the trans person by calling her “him” and “it,” simply because the trans person didn’t adhere to Roanna’s strict criteria of how people must think, and certainly not how trans people must think. The trans woman had asked Roanna to report the Joker character, who had threatened to come to her house and “f-ck her up.” Roanna replied that the trans woman would be “waiting a long time” before she reported her friend Joker.
Is this tolerance? After a while, and after many other twitter users pointing out Resisting Hate’s hypocrisy, Resisting Hate asked the trans woman if they could DM her to offer an apology for calling a trans lady “him” and “it.” The trans woman said, very correctly, that anything they had to say could be said in public since everything else they had thrown at her had been very public. Resisting Hate wanted to offer the trans woman an apology on their terms. The world is comprised of different time zones, and the trans woman told them she would accept their apology for their hateful behaviour if they pinned their apology to their page for 24 hours, so that all of their followers in all different time zones could see it. Resisting Hate said “NO” to that request, which makes me wonder how heartfelt their apology must have been.
Roanna used to tweet as “bored_rose” (a very well-known troll who relentlessly targeted people, including a woman whose husband was on life support, and was part of a group who then mocked the woman when her husband died), then she changed her @ to NoHateWitchy whilst still engaging with and in full support of Joker, Monkey, and Lazarus. She now chooses to go under her real name of Roanna Carleton-Taylor, after having been nominated for “crime-fighter” of the year (which she didn’t win – God only knows who researched the nominees, a quick glance over her Twitter account reveals Roanna to be aligned with jihadists, homophobes and racists).
Resisting Hate aren’t resisting hate, they are reviving it.
mortimer says
So Twitter seems to have no problem supporting those who actually solicit the murder of white people and the torture of gays? Is that because Twitter engineers are Muslims from the Third World who are paid low wages? That was seemingly the discovery of Project Veritas. Twitter’s third-world software programmers were having fun SHADOW BANNING anyone who criticized Islam, but Islamic terrorism supporters seemingly are not banned.
Andy says
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JyyusfIaLbY
Halal Bacon says
I am triggered by her fuglyness
Ordinary Joe says
Anne Marie is superb! – thanks for the link.
Andy says
My pleasure, Ordinary Joe
Carol says
At 6:35 Anne Marie begins to discuss calls for a “second” referendum and she mentions that this is what happened to Ireland. Pat Condell did this video (6 years ago) describing how the EU handles this and what they ended up doing to Ireland::
Come On, Ireland
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6M8an_XKL8
elee says
Some people find resonance in the world she lives in. Ultimately all we can do is expose them. In a free world those who choose the psychic sewers get to live there. Those who don’t live better lives, “be they stubbornly long or suddenly a mortal splendor.” If all are informed and choose freely this evil won’t sell in Britain or in Bahrain. Given a chance, freedom commends itself to most who look into freedom and its alternative.
Biastai says
Yup! They also threaten you when they Dox, but are in fact impotent left wing leaches! They threatened my business, which continues to thrive.
Tried to intimidate me on the phone! ?Tried to create an account using a picture of my son on Twitter to troll me, A minor I might add!
Police have this all down as a crime. They are criminals. But shit ones at that.
All their addresses and details are easily available. As are their businesses, their family details and photographs! However, it is the left that trolls like this. Weak and feeble.
B
Biastai says
*leeches. 🙂
isaac says
Hey can you connect? Share stories? If you contact Robert and ask him to pass your email along to A Londoner it would be amazing. It would help build a case around them.
Billy Chickens says
Rosanna is JOKER, MONKEY and LAZARUS.
isaac says
She very well could be. Have you had the misfortune to encounter this odious creature on any of your social media platforms?
Billy Chickens says
No, but now I’ll be prepared if I do.
Halal Kitty of Resisting Hate says
???the name is in the article and yet you’re still too dumb to spell her name right ????
isaac says
Best thing is to block them. They feed off your attention. Let them die without your oxygen.
Terry Gain says
Resisting Hate. Great, where do I sign up? And when and where is the first Koran burning festival?
isaac says
Excellent response.
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
Mr Spencer, you are the leader of myopic Islamic haters in the West calling all muslims as potentials terrorists, and as such They shall be banned. you consider such hate propagandas against muslims as freedom of speech. This group also has right to oppose and counter your views as part of their right to freedom of speech. what is the problem ?
Buraq says
@ Ibrahim itace Muhammed
For your information, Ibe, the rightly guided Mr Spencer has never said that ‘all Muslims are potential terrorists’.
In fact, it is Allah who commands all Muslims to be terrorists. For example, in Al Qur’an, Allah commands all Muslims ‘to fight until all religion, all of it, is for Allah.’ So, it’s Allah who tars all Muslims with the same brush, not Mr Spencer! Take your complaint to Allah, don’t tell lies here! Clown!
isaac says
Great reply
No Fear says
Ditto
Champ says
Bravo, Buraq!!!
gravenimage says
Fine post, Buraq.
The thing is that Ibrahim itace muhammed has affirmed that Muslims can rape Infidel women, that they can slaughter anyone who does not submit to Islam, and that he looks forward to taking part in the genocide of the Jews–yet he somehow does not consider this terrorism.
isaac says
Try READING the article and tell me what part of n-gger, f-ggot, spastic, mong, and flid you’re happy to be part of freedom of speech. These words misrepresent people to the degree that you falsely accuse Robert of misrepresenting islam. READ the article.
don vito says
itass, watch out for mad devil Trump, you might get droned.
Andy says
One can only hope! don vito.
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
your drones are obsolete brought down by Iran. we have developed more sophisticate ones that could smoke Savage mad devil Trump out blowing sound wind, track him down and bring him to justice for crimes against humanity. Take note
Prabh108 says
liar- drone was brought down by pakshitstan – not izlamo-iran
Iran under islam cannot be land of Aryan – iran following genitalia mutilating semtich creed
iran is non-arya until iran goes back to Dharmic zarathustran practices.
It is against my Dharma to have any contact with moslem mlecch but nevertheless it is sometimes necessary to set vehicular jihadist scumlords such as yourself straight
Arya Science rejects Islam. Arya can spot izlamo-nose and izlamo stench from miles away. Stop squatting on Arya territories of Hindosthan jihadist scum. Ghar Wapsi is your only hope dirty mlecch.
Lakshmi di Jai – Word LUCK has origin in Lakshmi Devi – may you never find luck until Ghar Wapsi.
Body designed for pleasure. Soul designed for bliss. Beauty destroying mlecch in 3 to 5 short centuries Earth will be liberated from your dirty creed. Castrate the mujahideen.
gravenimage says
What is Ibrahim itace muhammed babbling about now?
MFritz says
Please DON’T feed the troll! He’s so VERY CLEARLY a fake.
(And, no, leftistsruiningcanada, I’m STILL not going to tell you WHY and HOW because you can google it yourself – and I’m not helping this criminal to improve his “act” by telling you.)
Wellington says
MFritz: How do you know he is a fake? Why not just, in brief, give your reasoning for this. Telling someone to go to Google does not constitute any kind of argument, you know.
Fake or not, Ibrahim is malicious and while malicious people should not ALWAYS be answered neither should they NEVER be answered. If you don’t want to answer him, then don’t, but please don’t tell others what to do.
Buraq says
@ Ibrahim itace Muhammed on Jan 19th at 3.40 pm
You wrote, in your high-handed, supremacist way: Buraq, you must be an ignorant idiot. is that Quranic saying Muslims should go about carrying out acts of terrorism?
You’re a clown, if you think you can fool me, Ibe. As you well know, what we infidels call terrorism is called ‘jihad’ by slaves to the most violent ideology ever to exist on planet Earth – slaves like you!
Al Qur’an is packed with Allah’s eternal commands to carry out terrorist/jihad attacks on infidels. Paced, you clown!
gravenimage says
No, he’s not a fake. Ibrahim itace muhammed is a Nigerian Muslim. Read his Facebook page:
https://www.facebook.com/people/Ibrahim-Itace-Muhammed/100008365110176
MFritz says
“I saw it on television, so it must be real!”
You mean the very same Nigeria where these emails come from with the “prince” in need of money that “only you” can provide?
This guy is a FAKE. A hired goon. Some nobody student asshole with a pay check from Soros for every provocation he posts here and elsewhere.
Maybe I should get an UGANDAN fb-page just to prove my point and pretend I was a living meme too… “Do ya know tha way?”
gravenimage says
MFritz, your idea that Jihadists do not exist, but are just an idea ginned up by George Soros is mistaken.
isaac says
You post some hilarious replies. I love it.
Wellington says
Give it up, Ibrahim. Your religion is awful, a mortal enemy of liberty and was founded by a person who said, “I have been made victorious with terror.” {Bukhari Hadith 4.52.220}
Mohammed was a brutal psychopath, narcissist, rapist and pedophile. He bastardized the far more proper conception of any Godhead proffered by the Jews and Christians by turning God into a cosmic jerk who instructs his believers to use torture to keep non-believers in line (or dead) and demands submission 24/7.
Islam sucks. There is no Allah. And Mohammed was evil. Learn this.
gravenimage says
+1
LeftisruiningCanada says
Ibrahim. Talmud!
Andy says
To:Ibrahim itace muhammed
ISLAM IS THE PROBLEM!!!
Learning islam says
Off Topic JW Presenter
• Sexual Impotence: mo used to complain to allah about his impotency so allah sent Gabriel with some celestial food that give mo “ the sexsual potency of 40 men – Al Jamii al-Kabir, Al Suyuti, p. 2672#906
• Sexual Prowess? Narrated Aisha: “Magic was worked on allah’s apostle so that he used to think that he had sexual relations with his wives while he actually had not”
Hadith Bukhari book 7 volume 071 haddith 660
an interesting narrative (contained in Umdat al-Qari and Faid al-Qabir). Reportedly, Allah sent Gabriel with some sort of celestial food (called al-kofid) to Muhammad, commanding the latter to “Eat!”—identical to when Gabriel came to Muhammad saying “Read!” (i.e., iqra, the word for Koran). The report goes on to quote Muhammad saying that the food given to him “gave me the sexual potency of 40 heavenly men.”
from the Sunan of al-Tirmidhi, where it says that the “heavenly man” has the sexual potency of 100 mortal men.
“So, doing the math, 40×100, we can conclude that Muhammad, whenever he ate his heavenly aphrodisiac, had the sexual potency of 4000 men? Really, O umma, is this the claim to fame of your prophet—that he was a raving sex maniac?” Then, less seriously, “Imagine the surprise when Westerners find out that, once again, it was Muhammad who first discovered Viagra!”
• how for 1400 years barriers have been erected around Muhammad so no one—Muslim or infidel—could critique his life: “But the time has come; the barrier is broken
• stern WARNING! FOR ADULTS ONLY! THIS COMMENT CONTAINS UPSETTING AND SHAMEFUL FACTS ABOUT MOHAMMED’S BIZARRE SEXUAL BEHAVIOR. VIEWER DISCRETION ADVISED! VIEWER IS REQUESTED TO UNDERSTAND THAT NONE OF THESE DEPRAVED AND CRIMINAL ACTS ARE SEEN AS CRIMES TO MUSLIMS, EXCEPT IF THEY ARE COMMITTED BY SOMEONE ELSE. ———————————————————————————————————————-
• Here’s just a few examples from Islam’s own sacred authorities which the cowardly media and politically correct public schools and churches refuse to tell us about of the perverse sexual activity of “Islam’s perfect man.
The truth about Mohammed’s bizarre sex life is plain to see and easily found on the pages of Islam’s own recognized authorities. The best estimate based only on Islam’s own sources has Mohammed engaging in sexual relations with at least 66 women. He had 11 – 13 wives at one time and sexually exploited slaves, concubines and children. a list of all the women—66 are known—to have had sexual relations with Muhammad.
according to Sirat Al-Halabi, Muhammad can have a woman no matter what, even against her will; and if Muhammad desired a married woman, her husband would have had to divorce her. According to Ibn Sa’ad, who wrote another authoritative biographical account of Muhammad, “The prophet did not die till all women were permitted him” (see Kitab Al Tabaqat Al Kubra, v.8, 194).
Civilized people consider that to be the behavior of a criminal. Today he would be arrested, convicted, imprisoned and possibly executed. He would definitely be registered as a sex offender.Yet, muslims continue to regard Mohammad with great respect as their prophet.
“What prophet is this you follow?!” “Where is his morality? This is the man that Muslims follow slavishly? Use your minds!”
The question of morality and how it is—or should be—one of the hallmarks of “prophethood.” At the start, the focal question: “Was Muhammad the prophet a moral man—the most upright man, worthy of being emulated
an Ibn Taymiyya quote, which evaluated the signs of prophethood. Taymiyya asserted that there are many false-prophets, such as Musailima “the Liar,” a contemporary of Muhammad. Taymiyya concluded that many of these so-called prophets are, in fact, “possessed,” and that the only way to determine the authenticity of any prophet is by examining his biography (sira) and deeds, and see if he be found worthy of the title.
Being that this is the first of several episodes devoted to examining the concepts of morality and prophethood (with the notion that the former reinforces the latter), the theme for this particular episode was “purity” (tahara): “Was Muhammad a ‘pure’ man?”—in this context, a question concerning his sexual mores (or lack thereof).
warning: “for adults only!
“Is this the prophet I follow?” as he delineated some of Muhammad’s sexual habits.
First, from the Koran, read verses unequivocally stating that Muhammad is the paragon of all virtue and morality, such as “And most surely you [Muhammad] conform (yourself) to sublime morality [68: 4].”
• a hadith depicting Muhammad lying next to a dead woman in her grave, as well as pointing to hadith categories called “intercourse with a dead woman,”
isaac says
That was amazing. Thanks for that.
libertyORdeath says
“Civilized people consider that to be the behavior of a criminal. Today he would be arrested, convicted, imprisoned and possibly executed. He would definitely be registered as a sex offender.”
Unfortunately there are copious examples of Muslims committing the same kinds of sexual crimes in our time and in our countries with no legal or other consequences. And why wouldn’t they? Their religion, prophet and community have sanctioned the use of women as objects for 1400 years and now the “liberal” West has given them license to do the same under the guise of “religious freedom”.
I honestly wouldn’t have believed that western feminists would come to the point of not only looking the other way when it comes to misogyny and sexual abuse but actually supporting and defending it. I am seriously worried for the future generations if this trend continues.
LeftisruiningCanada says
Soon, Feminists will be demanding the Hijab.
Wait and see.
isaac says
It’s already made its way onto the catwalk, so you could well be right.
Learning islam says
Muhammad had sex with a dead Aunt fatima (ali’s mother ).
In a democratic system ALLAH is the president and muhammad is the prime minister. Allah was the slave of muhammad. Muhammad made sex with his dead aunty fatima (ali’s mother ). How a man can do this? Satan was born in the form of muhammad.
• ” The Muslim legal text, al-Sharwani’s Hawashi, confirms that sex with a dead woman is not sinful or wrong according to Islamic law. This law is based on the example set by Muhammad. According to the hadith, Muhammad had sex with a dead woman before she was put in the grave.
• The gravediggers were so embarrassed that they proceeded to bury the woman’s corpse and the prophet with dirt, exclaiming, “O Prophet, we see you do a thing you never did with anyone else.” Muhammad answered: “I have dressed her in my shirt so that she may be dressed in heavenly robes, and I have farewell intercourse with her in her grave so that the torments of the grave may be alleviated from her.” Recently a new law was proposed in the Muslim Brotherhood dominated Egyptian parliament. It would allow for “farewell intercourse” with a wife’s dead body. Obviously Muslims know very well about this demented practice by Mohammed. Postmortem sex is apparently a traditional value within Islam. Civilized people call it necrophilia and it’s a criminal act. for whom he had a sick and unhealthy attraction to her.
• Look also Sahih Muslim 34424 (the same case of sex with dead aunt) Commentary of Imam Al-Nawawi on the Hadith Sahih Muslim: Book 003, Number 0684
• Muhammad having sex with his dead Aunt in the Grave. [“Kanz Al Umal” (The Treasure of the Workers, by Ali Ibn Husam Aldin, commonly known as Al-Mutaki Al-Hindi. He based his book on the hadiths and sayings listed in “Al-Jami Al-Saghir,” written by Jalal ul-Din Al-Suyuti.) “‘I (Muhammad) put on her my shirt that she may wear the clothes of heaven, and I slept with her in her coffin (grave) that I may lessen the pressure of the grave. She was the best of Allah’s creatures to me after Abu Talib’… The prophet was referring to Fatima , the mother of Ali. “The Arabic word used here for slept is “Id’tajat,” and literally means “lay down” with her. It is often used to mean, “Lay down to have sex.”
• an account portraying how the prophet sexually exploited a “retarded” woman. According to 23 sources (e.g., Sahih Muslim vol.4, p.1812) a feeble-minded woman came up to Muhammad saying, “O prophet of Allah! I have something for you.” He clandestinely met her out back and took this “something” from her.
“I fear now that many believers will want to implement this sunna—don’t do it, guys, this is just to illustrate…. Listen you Muslims: don’t hate me for revealing all this to you; don’t lie in wait to kill me. I am merely revealing what your books contain. And, as always, we humbly await the great sheikhs and ulema to address these issues and show us where we went wrong.”
How well do you know islam? you only know what clerics teach you.. you are not encouraged to ask questions.. if the hadiths are unreliable, then we have to disbelieve muhammad’s supposed miracles which are mentioned in them…
Learning islam says
what is the historical context behind muhammads pedophilia?
if he was a prophet, he would have forseen that his actions would be judged as a crime in the future.
________________________________________
• Muhammad’s marriage to 6 year old Aisha. (Sahih Al-Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 58, Number 234 and 236).
Aisha is the child bride of Mohammed. He married her when she was only six and immediately began the practice of pleasuring himself between her thighs.
• Mohammad even proclaimed his affections and intentions of marriage towards little girls, often as young as 2-3 years old. Civilized people call this pedophilia- a wicked, criminal act.
one from the Musnad of Ahmad bin Hanbal, which records Muhammad seeing a 2-3 year old girl in her mother’s arms. Muhammad was so “impressed” by her that he said, “By Allah, if this girl reaches marrying age and I am still alive, I will surely marry her.”
Another hadith goes on to say that Muhammad ended up dying before this particular girl reached marriage age, Poor prophet! He missed one!”
keep this last hadith in mind, for “context,” another hadith from theSunan of Bin Said, which records Muhammad saying “I hugged so-and-so when she was a child and found that I greatly desired her.”
“What prophet is this you follow?!” “Where is his morality? This is the man that Muslims follow slavishly? Use your minds
• Aisha cleans Muhammad’s semen stains. (Sahih Al-Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 4, Number 229-233),
• Muhammad fondling Aisha during her ‘Menses’. (Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 6, Number 298-300), (Sunan Abu Dawud, Book 1, Number 0270)
• Mohammed’s sexual behavior also demonstrated transvestite tendencies.
There are 32 different references of Mohammad lying in bed dressed in women’s clothing. In a hadith from Sahih Bukhari (2/911), Mohammad is recorded saying, “Revelations never come to me when I’m dressed in women’s clothing-except when I’m dressed in Aisha’s,” implying that it was something of a habit for the prophet to dress in female clothing.
• Muhammad liked to have intercourse with Aisha and his other wives when they were menstruating. (Sahih Muslim, Book 003, Number 0577-0579)
• Muhammad loved to recite the Quran when his wives were in Menses while lying between their legs! (Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 6, Number 296), (Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 9, Book 93, Number 639)
• Muhammad exhibited homosexual tendencies?”
Mohammed’s sexual behavior demonstrated homosexual tendencies.
The anecdote revolved around a hadith that, while some ulema say is “weak,” is, nonetheless present in 44 Islamic books—including some highly respected collections, such as Sunan Bayhaqi and Al Halabi.
According to this hadith, a man named Zahir, who used to declare that “the prophet loves me,” said that one day Muhammad crept unawares behind him and put him in a bear-hug. Zahir, alarmed, yelled, “Get off me!” After turning his head and discovering that it was Muhammad, he stopped struggling and proceeded to “push his back into the prophet’s chest—prayers and blessings upon him.”
Another curious hadith contained in Sunan Bayhaqi and which traces to Sunan Abu Dawud (one of the six canonical hadith collections), has Muhammad lifting up his shirt for a man who proceeded to kiss his entire torso, “from his bellybutton to his armpits.”
“Imagine if the sheikh of Al Azhar [nearest Muslim equivalent to the pope] went around lifting his shirt for men to kiss his torso” (he proceeded to make smacking kissing noises, for effect).
• No less than 20 Islamic sources-such as the hadiths of Ahmad bin Hanbal-relay that Mohammad used to suck on the tongues of boys and girls, and even his own daughter. Along with sucking her tongue, Mohammad would also nuzzle his face in his own daughter’s bosom every night before going to sleep.
from various sources, such as a hadith relayed by Abu Hurreira (deemed an extremely reliable narrator), where Muhammad sucked on the tongues of his cousin (and future caliph) Ali’s two boys, Hassan and Hussein—they of revered Shia memory.
a hadith of Muhammad sucking on the tongue of his own daughter, Fatima.
the Arabic word for “suck” (muss) cannot, as some apologists insist, mean anything but “suck.”
“this is the same word used when discussing Muhammad’s ‘activities’ with his wives, especially his beloved child-bride, Aisha.”
“Dear lady, imagine, for a moment, coming home to find your husband sucking on your daughter’s tongue? What would you do? It’s even worse: it’s your prophet—the most “morally upright” man, a man to be emulated by the world! A man who on record used to go around sucking the tongues of his wives, his daughters, and young boys: Are these the activities of the man described in the Koran as being the pinnacle of moral perfection?”
“Muhammad would not sleep until he kissed his daughter Fatima and nuzzled his face in her bosom Dear lady! what would you say to your husband sleeping with his face in your daughter’s breast—is that the height of morality?!”
Commentaries in the Tafsir of al-Qurtubi—an authoritative exegesis in Islam.
one anecdote where Aisha said that, one day, while Muhammad was lying naked in bed, Zaid came knocking; Muhammad, without getting dressed, opened the door and “hugged and kissed him”—in the nude. Elsewhere, Qurtubi concludes that, “the prophet—prayers and blessings upon him—was constantly preoccupied with women.”
Muslims: “So this is your prophet—the most morally upright man? Instead of being preoccupied with, say, prayer or good deeds, he was preoccupied with women?”
from more sources, such as Sunan al-Nisa’i, wherein Muhammad used to in a single night “visit” all his women, without washing in between.: “Why even record such obscene and embarrassing things?”
Perhaps most entertaining, an anecdote recorded in Ibn Kathir’s al-Bidaya we al-Nihaya. Here is a translation for this lengthy account:
After conquering the Jews of Khaybar, and plundering their belongings, among other things, a donkey fell into the lot of the prophet, who proceeded to ask the donkey: “What is your name?”
The donkey answered, “Yazid Ibn Shihab. Allah had brought forth from my ancestry 60 donkeys, none of whom were ridden on except by prophets. None of the descendants of my grandfather remain but me, and none of the prophets remain but you and I expected you to ride me. Before you, I belonged to a Jewish man, whom I caused to stumble and fall frequently so he used to kick my stomach and beat my back.”
, “a taqiyya-practicing donkey!” “The prophet – may Allah’s prayers and peace be upon him – said to him, ‘I will call you Ya’foor. O Ya’foor!’ Ya’foor replied, ‘I obey.’ The prophet asked, ‘Do you lust after females?’ The donkey replied, ‘No!’”
“Even the donkey blushed for shame concerning your prophet’s over-sexed inquiries! Here we have what is supposed to be a miracle—a talking donkey; and of all things to communicate to this animal, your prophet’s most urgent question was whether the donkey lusts after females?”
• from Sahih Bukhari (5/2012), an accountCivilized people censor homosexuality and transvestism as abnormal sins against the laws of nature and nature’s God. Mohammad is on record in Faid al-Qabit (3/371) saying
“My greatest loves are women and perfume: the hungry is satisfied after eating, but I never have enough of women.” Another hadith: “I can hold back from food and drink-but not from women.” Finally, a hadith in al-Siyuti (6/395) quotes Mohammad as saying “In heaven, Mary mother of Jesus, will be one of my wives.” Civilized people call this insatiable lust sexual addiction. Mohammed is a whoremonger, who tried to turn even heaven into a brothel. Shame on Muslims & the media for condoning the actions of a man who has brought more misery to mankind, and especially women, than any other man since Adam. ——————————————————————————— REFERENCES TO PROPHET MOHAMMED’S CRIMES. ———————————————————————————
• Muhammad married his adopted Son’s wife called ‘Zaynab’ after lusting for her and then banned Adoption in Islam. (Surah 33:37, Sahih Al-Bukhari, Volume 6, Book 60, Number 305, Sahih Muslim, Book 008, Number 3330, Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 9, Book 93, Number 516,The History of Al-Tabari: The Victory of Islam, translated by Michael Fishbein, 1997], Volume VIII, pp. 2-3)
• Muhammad and the Quran sanctioned sex with your wives and ‘married’ slave girls. (Surah 70:22-30, 23:5,6, 4:24, 33:50),
• Muhammad speaks of sex with Slave Girls. (Sahih Bukhari – Volume 3, #432, Volume 9, #506, Volume 5, #637, Sahih Muslim, Volume 2, #3371) ”
• Muhammad disagreed with ‘coitus interruptus’ with slave girls – he supported RAPE!.”
• Muhammad forces a 17 yr old Jewish girl called Safiyyah to marry him and rapes her on the same day her husband and family are killed in the battle of Khaibar. (Sahih Al-Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 59, Number 522, Volume 1, Book 8, Number 367). “Al Tabari reported in his (‘The History of al-Tabari: The Victory of Islam’, Translated by Michael Fishbein) that even some of Muhammad’s wives and companions were shocked that he forced Safiyyah to marry him after beheading her husband, brother and father.”
• The evil self-proclaimed prophet, Muhammad, LIVED and DIED with the medical condition known today as PRIAPISM.
Simply put, because his penis was erect all the time, it caused him pain, and in order to remove the pain, he had to copulate, and copulate he did, with anyone and with anything, mostly animals.
Proof of his priapism is the scene on his death bed. “Muhammad’s Death Erection Abu al-Fida (1273 – 1331 AD) was a Muslim geographer and historian. He relates that Prophet Muhammad suffered from a death erection.
Ali ibn Abi Ṭalib, the fourth Rightly-guided Caliph of Islam (and also Muhammad’s son-in-law and cousin) washed his body after his death, and had exclaimed, “O prophet, thy penis is erect unto the sky!” Do we know of any other prophet or important man, who started a following, who penis was still living when the rest of him died? He was a sexual pervert with a voracious sexual appetite! Muhammad was unique, because his Allah, the same Allah in the Koran, was his nothing more than his own Penis.
isaac says
Thank you for all of that information
Learning islam says
the sort of foul language Muhammad — the “greatest example”
the sort of despicable language Muhammad used—In fact, your prophet said one of the most obscene Arabic words—the equivalent of the ‘f-word’ [google the “f-word” to understand what he was talking about]. ”
appears in 67 books, including Sahih Bukhari, the text containing this word, “inkat-ha” — or, in context, Muhammad asking a man about a woman if he “f***** her” —
What would you Muslims do if the Sheikh of al Azhar went around using such language? Worse — it’s your prophet, the ‘greatest creation.’”
According to Qaid al-Qadir (v.1, p.381), Muhammad told Muslims to retort to uppity infidels by saying things like —Go bite on your mother’s clitoris!” or, according to Zad al-Mi’ad (v.3, p305), “Go bite on your dad’s penis!”
“O prophet of Allah…prophet of Allah….Would that you would’ve heeded your lord Jesus’ counsel: ‘The good man brings good things out of the good stored up in his heart, and the evil man brings evil things out of the evil stored up in his heart. For out of the overflow of his heart his mouth speaks’ (Luke 6:45).”
from Sahih Bukhari (5/2012), an account where Muhammad went into the house of a young woman named Umaima bint Nua’m and commanded her to “Give yourself to me!” The woman responded, “Shall a queen give herself to the rabble?” Shaking his fist, Muhammad threatened her, and then sent her off to her parents.
“You see, people, even back then, in those dark ages, there were still people who had principles, who did not give way to threats and coercion. However, the real question here is, why was Muhammad contradicting the commandments of his own Koran—”if a believing woman gives herself to the prophet” (33:50)—trying to coerce this young lady?”
no less than 34 books, including the Tafsir of al-Qurtubi and Sahih Muslim, record that Muhammad used to “fondle”——”kiss and have sex while fasting, though he forbade others from doing so.”prophet has special dispensations:
“Come on man! Couldn’t you find another one of your 66 women? It just had to be the one menstruating?”
“But seriously, people: are you not ashamed of these things? I know I am—just mentioning them. And this is your ‘prophet’—the ‘exemplary man’?”
a hadith, narrated by Aisha, and contained in the canonical six, wherein the prophet’s young wife recounted how, whenever she was menstruating, if the prophet “wanted her,” he used to “command” her to have sex with him—”Commanded! This is rape! Who is this character you are following?”
from a number of other hadiths, all demonstrative of Muhammad’s sexual proclivities toward menstruating women—which the Koran forbids—adding, “People, if this is how the ‘prophet of God’ behaves, what can we expect from the average man?”
“Well, could other men behave this way?”
“Sure, the prophet was always generous to his followers, giving them ways out. According to eight hadith compilations, Ibn Abbas relayed that Muhammad said if a man cannot help himself and copulates with his menstruating wife, all he has to do is pay one dinar in atonement; if he sleeps with her towards the end of her cycle, when she isn’t bleeding as much, he need only pay half a dinar—a discount!” [saying “discount” in English].
“As you pointed out, since Muhammad had so many women, why did he even feel the need to resort to the ones that were menstruating?”
. The simple reason, my friend, is that Muhammad used to like smelling”—here he went sniff, sniff—”menstruation blood.” He then quoted from al-Siyuti, where Aisha relayed that Muhammad said to her “Come here,” to which she replied, “But I am menstruating, O prophet of God.” So he said “Expose your thighs”; she did so and “he proceeded to lay his cheek and chest on her thighs.”
How can such perverse behavior come from a prophet—the ‘greatest role model’?”
He then read a Sahih Bukhari hadith (v.6, p.2744) relayed by Aisha where she said that, while menstruating, the prophet used to lay his head on her thighs and recite the Koran. “While reciting the Koran!!”
examining Muhammad’s faithlessness towards his wives (though one would have thought the plural renders the notion of faithfulness moot), his sexually exploitative behavior, and his reliance on very obscene language.
the well known story where the prophet betrayed his wife Hafsa with a slave-girl
In short, after sending Hafsa to visit her father, the latter, halfway there, realized that it was “her day”—that is, the day when, of all his wives, Muhammad would visit her for “conjugal relations.” She hurried back “She knew him well: if she wasn’t there on her day, he would go crazy and grab the first female passing by!”).
In fact, Hafsa caught Muhammad with a slave-girl on the former’s bed. Muhammad quickly evicted the slave-girl and told Hafsa that if she kept this between them, he would henceforth refrain from the slave-girl.
To no avail: Hafsa gabbed and soon all of Muhammad’s wives revolted against his incessant philandering; “When things got critical, Muhammad decided to drop a ‘new revelation’ on them; so he threw surat al-tahrim (66: 1-11) at them, wherein Allah supposedly chastises Muhammad for trying to please his wives by not sleeping around, threatening the wives to get in line lest the prophet divorce them—indeed, lest they all go to hell.”
“Imagine, dear lady, if your husband asked you to go on errand and then you return before your time only to find him in bed with another woman? What sort of man would that make him in your eyes? Yet it’s worse—it’s your prophet, whom you all extol as the most perfect human, to be slavishly emulated!”
“clever little Aisha knew him [Muhammad] well”: whenever such verses were revealed rescuing Muhammad, Aisha would often observe that “Verily, your lord [Allah] is ever quick to fulfill your whims and desires (e.g., al-Siyuti v.6, p.629).
“that many believers will want to implement this sunna
LeftisruiningCanada says
Yours posts could be even more effective if you included links and such.
Plus, if you anticipated the muslim counter arguments, your posts would be formidable.
gravenimage says
Good points.
Learning islam says
revelation” of convenience
Quran (33:37) – “But when Zaid had accomplished his want of her, We gave her to you as a wife, so that there should be no difficulty for the believers in respect of the wives of their adopted sons, when they have accomplished their want of them; and Allah’s command shall be performed.”
No doubt millions of young Muslims, trying to outdo one another at memorizing the Quran, have wondered about what this verse means and why it is there.
In fact, this is a “revelation” of convenience that Allah just happened to hand down at a time when Muhammad lusted after his daughter-in-law, Zaynab, – a state of affairs that disturbed local customs. The verse “commands” Muhammad to marry the woman (following her husband’s gracious divorce). As for why this should be part of the eternal word of God…?
Quran (33:50) – “O Prophet! surely We have made lawful to you your wives whom you have given their dowries, and those whom your right hand possesses out of those whom Allah has given to you as prisoners of war, and the daughters of your paternal uncles and the daughters of your paternal aunts, and the daughters of your maternal uncles and the daughters of your maternal aunts who fled with you; and a believing woman if she gave herself to the Prophet, if the Prophet desired to marry her– specially for you, not for the (rest of) believers; We know what We have ordained for them concerning their wives and those whom their right hands possess in order that no blame may attach to you; ” This is another special command that Muhammad handed down to himself that allows virtually unlimited sex, divinely sanctioned by Allah. One assumes that this “revelation” was meant to assuage some sort of disgruntlement in the community over Muhammad’s hedonism.
Quran (33:51) – “You may put off whom you please of them, and you may take to you whom you please, and whom you desire of those whom you had separated provisionally; no blame attaches to you; this is most proper, so that their eyes may be cool and they may not grieve, and that they should be pleased” This is in reference to a situation in which Muhammad’s wives were grumbling about his preference for sleeping with a slave girl (Mary the Copt) instead of them.
Accordingly, Muhammad may sleep with whichever wife (or slave) he wishes without having to hear the others complain… as revealed in Allah’s literal and perfect words to more than a billion Muslims.
Quran (66:1-5) – “O Prophet! Why do you ban (for yourself) that which Allah has made lawful to you, seeking to please your wives?… Allah has already ordained for you, the dissolution of your oaths ” Another remarkably personal passage of sexual convenience in a book billed as Allah’s perfect and eternal message to mankind. Muhammad was caught sleeping with a slave woman on the night that he was supposed to be with one of his wives. Initially promising to be faithful, “Allah” tells his prophet to break that promise and enjoy sex with his slaves. If his wives objected then “it may be if he divorced you (all) that his Lord will give him instead of you, wives better than you.”
Quran (4:24) – “And all married women (are forbidden unto you) save those (captives) whom your right hands possess.” Allah even permitted Muhammad and his men to have sex with married slaves, such as those captured in battle.
isaac says
Outstanding. Thank you. Do you have a blog page or a website?
gravenimage says
Good posts, Learning Islam.
CRUSADER says
Wow.
LearningIslam has much “DOXing” going on about that dude Mohamhead.
Talk about “unmasking” !
isaac says
Too funny. Doxxing muhammad. I love it.
MFritz says
More like “Resisting reality”. But their methods (i.e. doxxing) are clearly criminal. Commiting crimes to “help the good cause”. Very typical of SJWs gone insane.
LeftisruiningCanada says
Alinsky would be proud of these guys.
CRUSADER says
Good ole Sal Alinsky.
Have we heard from him much lately?
LeftisruiningCanada says
I’m not one for necromancy, but i’m sure some of his ilk might be able to help you out.
gravenimage says
I afraid we hear from him all the time…
MFritz says
Or Kristy Winters. Another one of those insane feminists who consider any crime to be “just” as long as it helps their SJW-cause.
Halal Kitty of Resisting Hate says
Awwww. Bless
isaac says
‘Shitting in the streets’….LOLZY…. with no clit either…. there’s a storm coming your way babe. Just wait and see. Hold on to your stitched up vag.
gravenimage says
Halal Kitty, if you are pro-gay marriage–as it appears you are here:
https://resistinghate.org/homophobes-and-gay-marriage-in-australia/
then why are you OK with someone saying they are going to throw gay people off scaffolding? And don’t you know that this is indeed Halal?
You also sneer at the idea of Muslim pedophilia on your site. Don’t you realize that this is a real issue? Or are you for it?
6woods says
She’s for it…or maybe she’s against it. What does it matter? She’s on crack. She doesn’t know what she’s for or against. No principles.
isaac says
Great comment. For Resisting Hate, it’s not about politics or left or right. It’s simply sheer hatred of anyone whose point of view they don’t like. That’s the problem.
Johnny Cuyana says
gravenimage, don’t fall for this suspected ploy; so, please be informed:
death cult mohammedans will create, with the kaffir, any kind of faux “honor among thieves and liars” arrangements … but, just for the period of time needed to promote their cult agenda. To wit, in a case such as this, if indeed, halal kitty does hold these apparent conflicting views:
[a] mohammedans will side with pro-gay-marriage groups; because
[b] such will help to further erode the Western one-man-one-woman-marriage norms; but
[c] ultimately, and more important to them, in the event gay marriage is made good all over, the mohammedans will clamor for POLYGAMY, one of their pet perversion; and,
[d] once polygamy is in place, all “marriage” arrangements with the pro-gay special interests groups are fini, and
[e] once again, the targeting and murdering of gays will become “fair game”.
In their war against the kaffir, it’s all part of their acceptable “war is deceit” notion.
Easy-peasy … if you are a lying death cult mohammedan.
Sarah says
I can’t help but wonder at these types of people. Would they ever do this kind of thing to others, if they didn’t have the faux comfort of anonymity that the internet provides them?
I’ve said some pretty intense stuff over the years, at times, online. But I have never said anything that I wouldn’t say to someone’s face. Yeah, I’m pretty confrontational by nature anyway, so it doesn’t make me brave or courageous, as not everyone is naturally comfortable with genuine face-to-face confrontation for a trillion different reasons.
So these ‘trolls’, are they true cowards, or are they actually quite capable of behaving this way in real life, face to face with another human being? I’m willing to bet some are pathetic and weak, but I’m willing to bet that some are perfectly capable and willing to spray their cruelty in real-time. That makes at least some of them, the utter dregs of the human species.
What is wrong with you, that you think its OK to absolutely destroy someone’s life, while you have absolutely zero authority to do so, all because you don’t like where that person is coming from? I can tell you right now, I can’t stand that idiot, Itace Muhammed Ibrahim or whatever his name is, who comments on this site. I think he’s a loser, a coward and a hypocrite. But I have no interest or desire to do anything so inherently vile and cruel as try to dox the idiot.
He has his opinions, I downright hate them 99% of the time, but I still hold to his right to have them. As much as he’s a total tool and I wish he’d get a life and go away. Trying to actively silence him by destroying him – hell, that’s almost as bad as going to his home and blowing it up – decent human beings just don’t do that kind of thing. And I am presuming, as much as this guy is a spazz, he is also, not going to such heinous extremes like these ‘trolls’ in the article.
And I guess that sums it all up, really. Herein lies the difference between decent human beings and those who are not. Those who are the dregs of our species.
isaac says
That’s a great comment and exactly how I feel about the whole situation.
LeftisruiningCanada says
It is a testament to our fine and (by the Grace of Christ) elevated western values that you would permit his dyspeptic utterances, but rest assured he (Ibrahim, as representing Islam) would do away with your, and our, freedoms for opposition if he could.
He represents a strain of thought that would have no qualms with annihilating all dissenting opinion. (the annihilating would of course be of the bodies of those who dissent….the idea, much to their annoyance, cannot be destroyed.)
His strain of thought has done so many times, in the past.
——————————
“Herein lies the difference between decent human beings and those who are not (decent)”
——————————
Herein lies the difference between slavery, and resistance to slavery..correct.
Carol says
Silly sadists (or possibly Satanists?) not worth the time of day. Possibly trying to smear Western people with what they are themselves. Probably get snorts for their trouble on lunch break.
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
Buraq, you must be an ignorant idiot. is that Quranic saying muslims should go about carryingout acts of terrorism ? what is terrorism ? Is fighting at battle front an act of terrorism ? if that is the case ,then filthy mithraist christians are also terrorists when they fought and kiłled more than 20 million muslims and Jews during crusade wars in the name of mithraist Christ. They are also terrorists when they fought and kiłled more than 50 millions wide during colonisation. Again, wicked mithraist christians carried genocidal killings of Aboriginists in Americans and settled there, including your foreparents Who came from Europe. Not long ago, the evil united states led collation where They kiłled more than 3 million Iraqis where some unexploded cluster bombs were found bearing mithraist evîl biblical verses.
Tell me how many non-muslims kiłled in all jîhad fightings and at where ? or how many non-combatant civilians were kiłled in any jihad fighting operations and at where ? you can then compare and contrast Who is more terrorist, according to your définition of terrorism, between muslims and filthy mithraist christians.
To m’y understanding, terrorism simply means indicriminate killings of innocent defenceless people by supprise attacks as Misguided Isis are doing aligning It to Islamic jîhad, which is not. Jihad fighting is an organised military confrontation between muslim forces and hostile non-muslim forces within rules of engagement laid down by the sharia. As such any muslim who kiłls non-muslims in contravention of such rules of engagement is not fighting jihad, and he Will be punished. such rules of engagement were spelt out by prophet muhammad himself. It means Isis and other terrorist groups are operating contrary to what prophet muhammad taught. you ask them where They get justification for their terrorist acts. Can they know the Quran more than prophet muhammad ?
Champ says
What’s crazy is that there are millions more like him …
gravenimage says
The appalling Ibrahim itace muhammed wrote:
Buraq, you must be an ignorant idiot. is that Quranic saying muslims should go about carryingout acts of terrorism ?
…………………………….
Well, yes it is. The Qur’an is full of exhortations for Muslims to slaughter Infidels simply because they are not Muslim. And in the Hadith, Muhammed said, “I have been made victorious through terror”.
More:
what is terrorism ? Is fighting at battle front an act of terrorism ?
…………………………….
If the attack was unprovoked, then it is certainly terrorism. Muslims have attacked, enslaved, and conquered innocent people all over the world.
Moreover, Ibrahim itace muhammed has affirmed that Muslims may slaughter any Infidels who do not submit to Islam.
More:
if that is the case ,then filthy mithraist christians are also terrorists when they fought and kiłled more than 20 million muslims and Jews during crusade wars in the name of mithraist Christ.
…………………………….
Uh…given that an estimated 1.7 million people died in the Crusades on all sides–including people who never even made it to the Levant–this number is absurd.
And never mind that the Crusades were a *defensive* series of wars fought after centuries of Islamic conquest and oppression of Christians.
And yes–Jewish people were killed by Christians in the Crusades–not a proud moment. Really shameful.
It is notable, though, that Ibrahim itace muhammed has himself said that he is looking forward to taking part in the genocide of the Jews. The idea that he championing Jewish people is absurd.
More:
They are also terrorists when they fought and kiłled more than 50 millions wide during colonisation. Again, wicked mithraist christians carried genocidal killings of Aboriginists in Americans and settled there, including your foreparents Who came from Europe. Not long ago, the evil united states led collation where They kiłled more than 3 million Iraqis where some unexploded cluster bombs were found bearing mithraist evîl biblical verses.
…………………………….
Generally the most inflated figure is 500,000–I see that Ibrahim itace muhammed has multiplied that by six now. He does so enjoy pulling figures out of his *ss.
And he has made this ludicrous claim about bombs with Bible verses, but has never backed this up. I have never been able to find so much as an unsubstantiated claim–so Ibrahim itace muhammed has likely made this up himself.
And *right now*, he and his fellow Nigerian Muslims are engaged in genocide against the Christian and animist population there. He has never said anything critical of this.
More:
Tell me how many non-muslims kiłled in all jîhad fightings and at where ? or how many non-combatant civilians were kiłled in any jihad fighting operations and at where ? you can then compare and contrast Who is more terrorist, according to your définition of terrorism, between muslims and filthy mithraist christians.
…………………………….
Muslims have slaughtered an estimated *270 million people*. That’s quite a bloody figure–one that Ibrahim itace muhammed should be very proud of.
More:
To m’y understanding, terrorism simply means indicriminate killings of innocent defenceless people by supprise attacks as Misguided Isis are doing aligning It to Islamic jîhad, which is not. Jihad fighting is an organised military confrontation between muslim forces and hostile non-muslim forces within rules of engagement laid down by the sharia. As such any muslim who kiłls non-muslims in contravention of such rules of engagement is not fighting jihad, and he Will be punished. such rules of engagement were spelt out by prophet muhammad himself. It means Isis and other terrorist groups are operating contrary to what prophet muhammad taught. you ask them where They get justification for their terrorist acts. Can they know the Quran more than prophet muhammad ?
…………………………….
Uh…right. The “Prophet” Muhammed attacked any people where he did not hear the Adhan (Muslim call to prayer) at dawn–in other words, *any* non-Muslim people.
It is also well known that Muslims do not consider any unbelievers to be innocent. Given that Ibrahim itace muhammed has said that anyone who does not submit to Islam should be slaughtered, his claims that ISIS is somehow getting it all so very wrong is just ridiculous.
As I’ve noted before, he does not actually disagree with ISIS on any points–more likely he does not like them because they are rival Jihadists.
LeftisruiningCanada says
Ibrahim, how do you define ‘innocent’ or “non combatant”?
Of course, Christians have done bad things, you think we don’t know that or admit it? You should see how well the native indians are looked after in Canada.
But you, you don’t seem to think that muslims have ever done anything wrong to anybody, ever.
It’s that kind of blindness that seems to dominate the minds of muslims like you Ibrahim.
And, by the way, when can we look forward to reading your indepth and accurate expose of the Talmud?
I’m still looking forward to you defense of this mithraist Christianity nonsense you so love to repeat. You do know repeating something doesn’t make it true, don’ you?
We don’t think like you muslims, Ibrahim….here, it’s not how loudly or how confidently you say something which wins the debate. Do you understand that?
Why have you ignored our conversation, that you started in the first place?
Coward are you?
Every time you dodge answering these questions you just confirm to everyone how worthless your islam is. You sneak around avoiding having to expose the weakness of your ideas and beliefs. It’s so bad, you just make quotes up, trying to vilify others. By doing so, you again tell us that you have NOTHING of value. Only lies and death. You also tell us how stupid all your muslim brothers are, because they probably believe your lies because, like you, they are too stupid to bother checking things out.
Wellington says
Fine post and thus seconded, my neighbor to the north.
Interesting and instructive how no defense of Islam “ever works.” The more one examines Islam, I mean truly examines it, it is impossible for any sensible person to defend it. Other major faiths, yes. Islam, most certainly not.
Hope all is well with you in a world that is not well. Take care. It is always worth reading your posts.
LeftisruiningCanada says
Good morning neighbor, doin’ ok this side of the line for now, thanks for asking.
Hope it’s well with you too Wellington…better in fact. 🙂
gravenimage says
Good posts, LeftisruiningCanada and Wellington. Glad to call you both friends. 🙂
Sheryl says
The ex Scottish soldier lives near me and has mental illness. He isn’t much of a convert to Islam because he gets drunk and makes a fool of himself.
Carol says
au contraire – many muslims can’t handle alcohol and some claim this is the reason it is haram. And it’s obvious that mental illness and making a fool of oneself are part of the gift wrap.
Learning islam says
Dear isaac , I do not have a blog page or a website.
Dear Crusader, MFritz, Issac or any Jihad Watch Reader, I can cut from quran, sira, ( biography) and hadith but unable to paste. Any advice, how to do it.. I found mohammed and his women U-tube which has 61 mohammed’s women names out of 66. I like to paste all with sources for the readers.
Muhammad forbade his widows from remarrying, even making sure that this “divine” order was forever preserved in the eternal word of Allah – Quran (33:53). To add insult to injury, they were all summarily disinherited from Muhammad’s estate by his successor (courtesy of another divine order “given” to Abu Bakr from Allah).
isaac says
Hey no I don’t have a blog post either I’m afraid. I think you can get a WordPress one for free and they seem to be easy enough to use.
gravenimage says
Learning Islam wrote:
Dear Crusader, MFritz, Issac or any Jihad Watch Reader, I can cut from quran, sira, ( biography) and hadith but unable to paste.
……………………..
Learning Islam, cutting is [control-C]. Pasting is the less obvious [control-V].
Hope that answers the question.
CRUSADER says
Talk about Hate Groups…
….look what was said about Robert Spencer (the “Islamophobe”)….
This below is from ….wait for it and try not to laugh … “media matters”:
———————————————————————————
https://www.mediamatters.org/blog/2015/03/25/fox-figures-ted-cruz-speaking-alongside-leading/203036
Fox Figures, Ted Cruz Speaking Alongside Leading Islamophobe Who Was Cited By Norwegian Terrorist
Blog ››› March 25, 2015 12:30 PM EDT ››› LIBBY WATSON
(photo of spencer and co)
Fox News figures and Republican 2016 hopeful Sen. Ted Cruz (TX) are slated to appear alongside Robert Spencer — one of conservative media’s favorite leaders in “Islam bashing” — at a conference this week, amid cries from Muslim rights groups for Cruz to cancel the engagement.
The Young America’s Foundation (YAF) will host the conservative New England Freedom Conference this week in New Hampshire. In addition to Fox Business host John Stossel, Fox contributor Katie Pavlich and Cruz, the event will feature noted extremist Robert Spencer and promised, “If you are interested in public policy, free speech, less government, and a strong national defense, this conference is for you. Along with Senator Ted Cruz, you will hear from Jihad Watch’s Robert Spencer about Islamic terrorism and jihad.”
Spencer is described by the Southern Poverty Law Center’s Extremist Files as “one of America’s most prolific and vociferous anti-Muslim propagandists.” He’s a prominent figure with Jidhad Watch and Stop Islamization of America (SOIA) – two organizations deemed hate groups by SPLC.
Spencer was also described by the Center for American Progress (CAP) in a 2011 report on Islamophobia as one of their five top “misinformation experts.” The CAP report highlighted some disturbing facts, including that he and Jihad Watch “were cited 162 times in the nearly 1,500-page manifesto of Anders Breivik, the confessed Norway terrorist who claimed responsibility for killing 76 people, mostly youths,” and quotes former Nixon adviser and deputy director of the National Security Council Robert Crane in describing Spencer as “the principal leader… in the new academic field of Islam bashing.”
His anti-Islamic rhetoric has solidified Spencer a place as a right-wing media darling, turned to by Fox Newsand conservative sites like National Review Online as a go-to expert on Islam despite his extreme leanings. Fox turned to Spencer as recently as January to spew Islamophobia during a discussion about the deadly attacks on satirical French newspaper Charlie Hebdo. Appearing on Hannity, Spencer cited the “much higher” birth rate of Muslim populations to fearmonger that “Sharia enclaves” will “inevitably grow and continue to grow until, finally, that’s all there is.”
It is for extremist rhetoric such as this that Muslim advocacy groups like The Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) have called on Cruz to cancel his upcoming appearance with Spencer at YAF. In a March 24 press release, the group pointed to the designation of Spencer’s organizations as hate groups by the SPLC as one of the reasons why Cruz should step back from the event. “As the first Republican to declare his candidacy for president, CAIR recommends that Senator Cruz reach out to members of the American Muslim and other U.S. minority communities to better understand their issues and concerns, ” explained CAIR Government Affairs Manager Robert McCaw.
——
HA !
Champ says
Roanna is such a ridiculous person …
And haters gotta hate cause she certainly doesn’t “resist” it. What a crock.
gravenimage says
This “Resisting Hate” seems as anti-hate as Antifa is anti-fascist–in other words, not at all.
Billy Chickens says
There’s nothing more pathetic than people googling their names to see if they’re in the news.
Halal Kitty of Resisting Hate hatefully excoriated me (several comments above) for not spelling what’s her name’s name correctly (I’m just a lowly chicken, after all).
So to whatever your name is who I never heard of before reading this article, misspelling your name will not happen again because I’m not interested in you, your hate group or what you have to say, mainly because you’re wearing a Satanist symbol around your neck.
StellaSaidSo says
Such morons don’t deserve the oxygen of publicity, but if we must mention them, the least we can do is misspell their names.
Billy Chickens says
LOL!
Carol says
Since she posted as @bored_rose your inner genius jumped to the conclusion that her real name might differ from the funkyl ‘Roanna’. Halal Kitty actually looked stupid herself when she jeered that it was a spelling error.
isaac says
On twitter, their response to this article was ‘lol’. You would imagine any group who was serious about fighting hate and protecting their reputation would be able to refute the allegations put against them. But they can’t coz they’re all true.
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
Leftruinigcanada, ï am glad that you have admitted that mithraist christians carried out genocidal killings of muslims during crusade wars, colonisation,erasing and cleansing of Aboriginists in Americas,Though you said they are not in accordance with mithraist Bible. But when ï opened thé covers of mithraist Bible, kJ version, ï found in Samuel 15:3 a command or order from mithraist god to kill all those living, including infants whose heads shall be smashed on the rocks. in the NT part, in Matthew, Jesus said he did not Come for peace, but sword. It means all genocide killings carried out by church are pursuant to mithraist biblical injunctions. To conclude otherwise Will be no more than a folklore.
I still maintain my position that present day christianity is paganic from mithraism of old inspired by thé Satan christians Call holy spirit despite your réfutations of the works of scholars ï referred to by attacking their persons rather than the substance, which is an adhominem fallacy. This is also the case on Racism in the evil talmud i quoted published by Boston talmud society currently believed and used by fascist evil zionist state of Israel in its obnoxious racist policies against palestinians.
Leftruinigcanada, mithraist christianity is rotten and not salable, because it too irratiational .That is why you have many atheists in the west, because no human with good rational calculation will accept pagan doctrines líke Godman Who was kiłled by the same human he came to save, resurrected and ascended to heaven saving those who believe that he was kiłled. Is that not an idiocy to the core ?
Billy Chickens says
Ibrahim I. M., Have you never read the Quran and Hadith? Killing killing killing…Muslims have killed over 270 MILLION people in the past 1400 years and the number rises every day.
Muhammad’s “Angel Gabriel” was Satan appearing as Gabriel, therefore the Quran is the world of the devil. Muhammad himself even said that he had seen a jinn until his wife convinced him otherwise.
LeftisruiningCanada says
“, ï am glad that you have admitted that mithraist christians carried out genocidal killings of muslims during crusade wars, colonisation,erasing and cleansing of Aboriginists in Americas”
Didn’t really admit to your twisted distortions of truth though. We can look at specifics if you like, but i’m guessing you don’t.
“Though you said they are not in accordance with mithraist Bible. But when ï opened thé covers of mithraist Bible, kJ version, ï found in Samuel 15:3 a command or order from mithraist god to kill all those living, including infants whose heads shall be smashed on the rocks”
Of course, your false quote (not surprising) doesn’t say the bit about smashing with rocks, but you have the main idea correct.
Interestingly, the people of Amelek are thought by many to be the ancestors of the Bedouin who are still to be found in the area. The reason they were being attacked in this way was as punishment for the unprovoked desert raid type attacks upon Israel when they were weak. Idolatry and sin in general cannot be factored out either.
Funny that you would be so upset about the punishment of a people that so resemble your mohammad and his band of petty thieves.
If you can show me how this judgment upon a criminal people for actually having done wrong is worse than what mohammad was told to do, and, if you can show that Israel was commanded to keep on killing everyone that didn’t become a believer in the God of Israel FOR THE REST OF TIME, then you may have a point.
As usual, you incredible lack of joined up thinking is giving us all a great show on the dangers of islam.
“in the NT part, in Matthew, Jesus said he did not Come for peace, but sword. It means all genocide killings carried out by church are pursuant to mithraist biblical injunctions. To conclude otherwise Will be no more than a folklore.”
Oh dishonorable Ibrahim, have you even bothered to read the chapter?
“32So everyone who acknowledges me before men, I also will acknowledge before my Father who is in heaven, 33but whoever denies me before men, I also will deny before my Father who is in heaven.34“Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I have not come to bring peace, but a sword. 35For I have come to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law. 36And a person’s enemies will be those of his own household. 37Whoever loves father or mother more than me is not worthy of me, and whoever loves son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. 38And whoever does not take his cross and follow me is not worthy of me. 39Whoever finds his life will lose it, and whoever loses his life for my sake will find it.”
There is a parallel verse in Luke: http://biblehub.com/commentaries/luke/12-51.htm
Christ is so obviously talking about what happens when someone in a family becomes a follower of Him, while the rest follow some other God. He is so very clearly saying that faith in Him is going to the main priority in a person’ life, and that it will lead to rejections by and of family, and even persecution and death.
Those people who are set free from islam often face their own families trying to kill them, which is a perfect example of what Christ was telling us there.
You will have no way to counter that reading, because it’s so obvious.
LeftisruiningCanada says
“I still maintain my position that present day christianity is paganic from mithraism of old inspired by thé Satan christians Call holy spirit despite your réfutations of the works of scholars ï referred to by attacking their persons rather than the substance, which is an adhominem fallacy”
I know that you still maintain your belief Ibrahim, but you also maintain your cowardly refusal to engage in any sensible discussion on the subject.
Instead of choosing a few specific examples so that it is possible to look at the details and evidences, you keep citing entire books, or at best whole pages, expecting me to refute the whole thing.
If you were serious, you would want to focus on a very small number of points at a time, and build your case by supporting each one.
I mentioned the character and beliefs of the authors because you offered nothing else for me to respond to. I did not try to refute their statements based on an ad hominem argument, and even said that they might say some truthful things at times.
The utter lack of credibility that your favorite authors have, was noted because it means we have to doubly sure to check everything they say…especially the quotations they make, several of which i have already discovered to be dishonest on page 16 of H Ellerbe’s book.
Funny how you have a similar citation ‘technique’.
“This is also the case on Racism in the evil talmud i quoted published by Boston talmud society currently believed and used by fascist evil zionist state of Israel in its obnoxious racist policies against palestinians.”
You posted a few false quotes up that you said were from the Talmud, one of which wasn’t even from the Talmud, but from a guy writing 600 years after the Talmud, who’s quote you changed anyway.
If you want to quote me some more, i’ll be happy to fact check them for you. I’m guessing they will all be simple fabrications anyway.
Why not provide links to primary sources to prove to us all that the Talmud really is as bad as you claim? Why all the ducking and weaving?
And there was you bragging about your rich Jewish family heritage Ibrahim. More lies perhaps?
You see how this works, right Ibrahim? The more you lie and fail to back up your statements with links to real documents (not just other unqualified people saying the same thing as you without primary sources) the more other people like me start to not trust you, and find your subsequent statements ridiculous.
Your utter lack of interaction with sources i offer back to you, is quite noteworthy.
“That is why you have many atheists in the west, because no human with good rational calculation will accept pagan doctrines líke Godman Who was kiłled by the same human he came to save, resurrected and ascended to heaven saving those who believe that he was kiłled. Is that not an idiocy to the core ?”
Ah yes, the dangers of personal choice in religion, always a touchy and shocking subject for a muslim.
I’m sure you will agree with me that it is always preferable to retain outward shows of obedience in a population by threats of torture and death, than to risk allowing people who don’t believe to go their own way….
But then, that would be really idiocy to the core, wouldn’t it Ibrahim?
(you haven’t proven that the Christian concept of Christ’s deity is pagan. You have stated it, but not proven it. Do you realize the difference?)
gravenimage says
Fine post.
gravenimage says
More from Ibrahim itace muhammed:
Leftruinigcanada, ï am glad that you have admitted that mithraist christians carried out genocidal killings of muslims during crusade wars, colonisation,erasing and cleansing of Aboriginists in Americas,Though you said they are not in accordance with mithraist Bible.
……………………………
Actually, LeftisruiningCanada said no such thing. But who would ever expect accuracy from Ibrahim itace muhammed?
More:
But when ï opened thé covers of mithraist Bible, kJ version, ï found in Samuel 15:3 a command or order from mithraist god to kill all those living, including infants whose heads shall be smashed on the rocks.
……………………………
There is no reference in that verse to smashing anyone with rocks. Why is Ibrahim itace muhammed so dishonest? Wait–don’t answer that…
More:
in the NT part, in Matthew, Jesus said he did not Come for peace, but sword.
……………………………
The full verse is this:
Matthew 10:34-36:
“Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. And a man’s foes shall be they of his own household.”
This just means that those who follow Christ have to be prepared that becoming a Christian can bring strife from family members and other loved ones, and that Christians need to be prepared for that.
Jesus never perpetrated a single act of violence, unlike the blood-drenched “Prophet” Muhammed.
More:
It means all genocide killings carried out by church are pursuant to mithraist biblical injunctions. To conclude otherwise Will be no more than a folklore.
……………………………
What claptrap. See above.
More:
I still maintain my position that present day christianity is paganic from mithraism of old inspired by thé Satan christians Call holy spirit despite your réfutations of the works of scholars ï referred to by attacking their persons rather than the substance, which is an adhominem fallacy.
……………………………
Actually, despite so many posters calling him on this ahistorical bs, Ibrahim itace muhammed has never cited any scholars that I have seen–not even charlatans. Citations, please.
More:
This is also the case on Racism in the evil talmud i quoted published by Boston talmud society currently believed and used by fascist evil zionist state of Israel in its obnoxious racist policies against palestinians.
……………………………
Is this another fake Talmud quote from Ibrahim itace muhammed? Note that he does not even cite anything here.
More:
Leftruinigcanada, mithraist christianity is rotten and not salable, because it too irratiational .
……………………………
Ibrahim itace muhammed hates Christianity because it does not support Muslim child marriage, the rape of Infidels, and the slaughter of unbelievers, as Islam does. He considers this moral decency “irratiational”.
More:
That is why you have many atheists in the west, because no human with good rational calculation will accept pagan doctrines líke Godman Who was kiłled by the same human he came to save, resurrected and ascended to heaven saving those who believe that he was kiłled. Is that not an idiocy to the core ?
……………………………
There are Atheists in the West because the West has religious freedom–one can believe in any faith, or none.
Ibrahim itace muhammed is confused, because in Islam anyone who tries to leave is targeted for murder. He himself has said that anyone who leaves Islam can be killed. *Ugh*.
As for Christianity, of course he is unable to grasp the idea that God can love his creation. In Islam, “Allah” is a vicious, blood-thirsty deity, and Ibrahim itace muhammed is enraged at the idea of a loving, caring Creator. How sad.
MH says
She seems to have a platform here:
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/author/roanna-carletontaylor/
isaac says
Yes, far left and heavy on the islamophobia. They’ll take anyone who shares their views, no matter how atrocious a writer they are.
Baucent says
She has the intense stare of the truly mad.
isaac says
Absolutely.
StellaSaidSo says
Reminds me of Ibrahim Hooper.
Kathy says
Far from resisting hate, this toxic female(?) clearly embraces hatred in all its sicker aspects with a fervour that is truly mind-blowing! She is obviously psychotic and hasn’t been taking her meds for a long time now, she and her various alter egos desperately need to be committed to an asylum for the criminally insane, for their own good as well as for the good of society as a whole.
Billy Chickens says
And she wears a Satan’s star necklace.
LeftisruiningCanada says
Has the look doesn’t she.
LeftisruiningCanada says
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/roanna-carletontaylor/no-far-right-haters-pagans_b_17457776.html
No need to guess
LeftisruiningCanada says
And she is very confused in her political categories:
“The extreme right wing would be Political Fascism”
In her strong desire to disparage anything not Socialist, which by definition makes anything to the right of it bad, she has made the common mistake of trying to shunt Fascism over to the extreme Right.
Apart from Fascism’s focus on a strong nation, rather than being internationalist as other kinds of Socialism tend to be, there is nothing Right wing about it. Fascists generally despise Capitalism and individual economic and social liberty every bit as much as any Communist, just for different reasons.
No, Fascism is a creature of the Authoritarian Left. I only looks right wing to people who need a way to use the slur of “Fascism” on their most disliked opponents.
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/roanna-carletontaylor/what-exactly-do-we-mean-b_b_17393486.html
isaac says
She says she is a ‘witch’ and she has a video online showing people how to be a pound shop witch on a budget.
Billy Chickens says
Islam is not an Abrahamic faith and does not “predate” Christianity. Islam’s Allah is Satan who dictated the Quran to Muhammad when he (Satan) appeared to Muhammad as “Gabriel the Archangel”.
UNCLE VLADDI says
Haven’t you heard?!
Being angry at (“hateful” towards) criminals is now the most vile sin, while pitying (“tolerating”) them all as “fellow victims,” is to be deemed the highest moral virtue, these days!
So much so, that the only advice we hear from “our” hypocrite governments, their pet media, and the corporazi globalist banksters who own them all, seems to invariably be:
“Anyone who doesn’t automatically pity all criminals as fellow victims should be hated!”
Which is why hurting the feelings of criminals by accusing them of their crimes, is now a “hateful” crime itself!
Ciaran Goggins says
They may have scored an own goal. I like Jews, Muslims, gays and before you think I’m on the wrong page I was, and remain, a target of “Resisting Hate”. Why? I had the temerity to write about false rape allegations. Joker is now outed as Sameed Damji. Monkey is Alina Friedman , and Laz is Nick Raybould. Over a year ago Karen Graham of Bury (who is closely linked to these freaks) swore that they would “get me”. They put an old address and mobile (given to them by Norfolk Police) online. I will keep up my research into police corruption and all they did was increase the Alt Right by one.
isaac says
Thanks for that
Ciaran Goggins says
You are welcome. We have a confirm on Laz – Raybould I am unsure Sluganna is Joker, plus other accounts. She iS quiet today! Strong rumour she is paid by Derbyshire police..
isaac says
There’s an article going round about the unholy alliance between Resisting hate and TellMama…that’s put them all in to panic mode.Connections established https://wordpress.com/post/twitterfidel.wordpress.com/31
puffnblow says
These people seem to be dodgy I can’t find out where they get their funds from and they seem to spend all day making lists and sending lots of emails trying to get people sacked or banned – they claim they were responsible for getting K. Hopkins sacked – so nobody except them complained – the same with Tommy Robinson’s lifetime ban on Twitter today – they are the sole cause of it and have been mail-bombing complaints in – they so not seem to have much if any public support but are being allowed to try to ruin people’s lives – more hateful than most people on the planet like all of these HateNotHope sort of very well-financed from mysterious sources fascist organisations in the UK – the public need help to protect ourselves from our own Govt who use these Hatefilled organisations to stifle dissent especially about the Islamists’ actual power that is increasing in the UK and our Govt is helping them spread by not letting anybody speak about the problems this is causing….
https://resistinghate.org/resisting-hate-view-on-robinsons-suspension/
isaac says
they’re tied in with fiyaz mughal and hope not hate…but too ashamed to publicly admit it, that’s how nasty they are.