Ian Thomas is lying, of course. In Rotherham, British officials “described their nervousness about identifying the ethnic origins of perpetrators for fear of being thought as racist; others remembered clear direction from their managers not to do so.”
And while British authorities were afraid to crack down on the Muslim rape gangs because they were afraid of being called “racist,” the Muslim rapists themselves made it clear that race was very much a factor in what they were doing. “You white women are good at it,” said one. “All white women are good for one thing, for men like me to f*** and use as trash,” said another.
Yet no one has noticed that a major factor in this rape gang activity was not race, but religion. The Qur’an teaches that Infidel women can be lawfully taken for sexual use (cf. its allowance for a man to take “captives of the right hand,” 4:3, 4:24, 23:1-6, 33:50, 70:30). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused. And ever is Allah Forgiving and Merciful.” (33:59) The implication there is that if women do not cover themselves adequately with their outer garments, they may be abused, and that such abuse would be justified.
But discussion of that is as far off the radar screen in shattered, staggering, dhimmi Britain as rocket ships from Pluto. The British government and establishment media persist in seeing the entire problem of jihad terrorism as a racial issue: brown people blow things up and kill people because they’re oppressed by white people, you see, and so if the white people will just be nice to the brown people, then all will be well, and all this talk of jihad and Sharia will melt away like the morning dew.
So witless officials such as Ian Thomas prove that they’re on the politically correct reservation by denying that the wholesale rape and trafficking of white British girls by Pakistani Muslim men has anything to do with race, and will trumpet some outlier case in which the victim was a Muslim or the perpetrator a white man (even a convert to Islam will do) in order to make their spurious case. But the larger denial is that of Thomas and the rest of the British establishment, in refusing to acknowledge the possibility that this behavior may be connected to the Islamic faith of the perpetrators — a faith that even white people can hold. No one in Britain dares to talk about that, as Perfidious Albion lurches toward its rapidly approaching doom.
“Rotherham: Child Services Boss Denies Race Was a Factor in Grooming Gang Scandal,” by Victoria Friedman, Breitbart, January 29, 2018:
The chief of children’s services in Rotherham has denied that there was a racial aspect to the city’s historic child abuse scandal which saw 1,400 underage, white, English girls groomed and raped by Pakistani-origin Muslim men over a 16-year period.
Ian Thomas, the strategic director of children’s services at Rotherham council, was speaking to BBC Radio 4’s Today programme after the once-failing department was rated as “good” by the education and child provisions watchdog Ofsted in a report published Monday.
Thomas was appointed following the damning findings of the 2014 Jay Report which noted that council staff were not able to speak about the common ethnic profile of the attackers for fear of being called racists….
“There’s no monopoly on CSE [Child Sexual Exploitation],” Thomas said.
“We focus on what children tell us… They will lead us to their abusers and that requires excellent relationship based practice so we’ve proven, given the profile of the perpetrators over the past 20 months, that race is not an issue for us,” he continued.
Attempting again to get clarity on the race issue, Montague said: “The reason why I raise race is because what became apparent was that there was a pattern [and] people were not allowed to talk about race… In this case, you needed to [see the race].”
“No,” Thomas said. “We needed to see the abuse. In terms of CSE, and the race dimension around CSE no race has the monopoly on CSE.”
“Indeed, but when you have a pattern of mainly Pakistani-originated men targeting mainly white English girls then surely you do need to take account of race?” asked Montague.
“No. We take account of abuse. We put the child at the centre and take account of the abuse,” said the director of children’s services.
Last year, a victim of a Rotherham Muslim grooming gang revealed she was told, as a 13-year-old, “numerous times” by police and social workers not to mention race.
Rotherham’s director of children’s services also confirmed in the BBC interview that 75 per cent of the council services staff who were employed during the child exploitation scandal are still employed at Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council.
In November, Breitbart London reported that Rotherham Council had been nominated for “social work employer of the year”.
In the same month, rape gang survivors told Channel 4 that groomers are still abusing young girls in the city.

StellaSaidSo says
Ian Thomas should be fired immediately. Not just for lying in the face of overwhelming evidence, but for being stupid enough to think that anyone would believe him. This fool should not be in charge of children’s services for Rotherham Council. He should be emptying bins.
Jayell says
He deserves to be in one of the bins.
Anne Smith says
This fool is probably one of the many graduates from the Marxist Common Purpose training programme. A course of Common Purpose is now an essential for anyone wanting to rise in the social services or local council departments.
Common Purpose proudly boasts of teaching people to lead beyond authority. Theresa May has praised its ethics and direction – so not a lot of hope while she is in charge. It is in effect a Marxist indoctrination programme which endorses the Kaeergi Coudenhove doctrine.
StellaSaidSo says
Yes, there is a strong whiff of Common Purpose here, Anne. I suspect Theresa May is also a ‘graduate’.
mortimer says
Of course, Ian Thomas IS LYING ! The whole point of going easy on the PAKISTANI MUSLIM RAPE GANG was to AVOID police being charged with RACISM.
It is more shameful for the police to have some FOOL throw the word ‘RACIST’ at them than for them to be CONDEMNED for NOT PROTECTING ENGLISH GIRLS from UNSCRUPULOUS, HATE-FILLED MUSLIM RAPISTS.
The police clearly LET THE PUBLIC DOWN.
mortimer says
The Pakistani Muslims are the real ‘RACISTS’ and the real ‘RELIGIOUS BIGOTS’ here.
Jayell says
Yet they are the ones to cry ‘racism’ or ‘bigotry’ at the first opportunity, like a scratched record. Do they know what these words mean? Everyone knows ‘it takes one to know one’ (as the old saying has it) but they still try it on regardless even though they’re transparent as a plate-glass window. There must be a connection with their educational attainment.
LeftisruiningCanada says
They’re simply the lowest form of human life, who will say or do anything if it serves their immediate purposes. No principle apart from “do as thou wilt”. No truth, just present necessity. No honor, just towers of pride that would make even a space elevator look meager.
Crying “Racist” just happens to be effective in the UK, so they say it.
R Russell says
It wasn’t race. It was ideology. Race is a euphemism for Ideology, but the ideology cannot be admitted either so Race is used as a way to confuse the masses.
Unless the UK wakens up and discovers a supernatural friendship with the Bible Jesus the country is doomed to submit to Islam.
Am I being weird? Yes many will think I am. Wait 10 years and we can discuss it again. That is if we still have the freedom to do so.
StellaSaidSo says
‘It wasn’t race. It was ideology.’
It was both. The ideology is inherently racist. Note, eg, the attitude > blacks, who are referred to as ‘raisin-heads’.
Many of the Rotherham victims reported remarks made by their abusers which leave no doubt that the victims’ ‘whiteness’ was an issue.
LeftisruiningCanada says
Yes, there is exactly NO doubt what these dregs were doing and why.
Anne Smith says
Winston Churchill’s excellent words of wisdom about Islam in h is book “The River War” still hold true today and Pakistan, where these men hail from, is one of the most retrograde backward Islamic states, where, in the name of Islam, they are happy to kill volunteer Aid workers to protect their children from the polio vaccination!!
Such stupidity and backward morality should never have been welcomed into the UK.
It is time to stop volunteering to help these depraved people and if Western Governments want to help they should stop sending shedloads of money to corrupt governments. Let them sort their own messes out.
Krishna says
Those Pakistanis are targeting even Sikhs and Hindu girls
LeftisruiningCanada says
That’s true Krishna, and the Sikhs were some of the first to draw attention to it in the UK, by getting involved, and sometimes by getting violent.
It’s likely that white British girls were seen as the easier targets after that.
Anne Smith says
The first person to draw attention to this ongoing scandal was the BNP leader, Nick Griffiths and for his pains he was demonised and victimised by the BBC and most of the media.
StellaSaidSo says
Anne Cryer MP (Labor, Keighley) was the first to raise the alarm (in 2002), followed by Nick Griffin (not Griffiths), who was also demonised by the authorities and the media. The same thing happened to Tommy Robinson when he took up the issue.
The nightmare continues. See Alex Jones interview with Tommy Robinson, YouTube title ‘Tommy Robinson on Info Wars Muslim Grooming Gangs’.
LeftisruiningCanada says
Reading in “Easy Meat”, i found the following:
3.1 1988 Sikh/Muslim Violence
The earliest manifestation of the Muslim grooming gangs, which we can establish with an objective reference, is in 1988. That year, in Wolverhampton, there were violent confrontations between Muslims and Sikhs. Sikh men formed into gangs to protect young Sikh girls from being groomed by gangs of Muslim men.
The main Sikh gang was called Shere Punjab. Some of the Sikh gang members received criminal convictions because of their attacks on Muslim gangs. In 1988 Look East, the BBC current affairs programme concentrating on Asian issues, included a segment on the ‘gang-warfare’ in Birmingham between Sikh gangs and Muslim gangs………..According to a Muslim youth worker in the programme, it all started when the Sikh gang ‘handed leaflets out saying that Muslim youths are coming round our schools… they are abducting our girls… and they are raping them an putting them into prostitution”
The next page contains referenves to another outbreak of the same thing in 1989:
“Sikh girls ‘used as sex slaves’
GANGS OF Muslim men toured daytime discotheques kidnapping Sikh girls to use as sex slaves, a court was told yesterday.
The jury at the trial of 13 Sikh men at Birmingham Crown Court heard claims that one gang forced girls into prostitution and blackmailed their parents.
The Sikhs were said to be members of the Shere Punjab, a vigilante gang, who were arrested – armed with sticks and bottles – while on their way to confront the rival Muslim gang, the Aston Panthers, in Handsworth, Birmingham, last June.
Gurmek Singh Chahal, 20, told the court [the Muslim gang] the Panthers used Indian girls for sex and prostitution…10
(10 ‘Sikh girls “used as sex slaves’”, The Independent, 24 Jun 1989)
No Muzzies Here says
They are so ugly that goats run away from them when they approach.
MFritz says
This cancer will not go away as long as you don’t cut it out.
thesailor says
I think that sums up the whole situation quite succinctly.
DHazard says
He is denying race has anything to do with the rape gangs for exactly the same reason he (or his peers) overlooked their existence; fear of being called a racist.
So what about motivation? It’s part of every criminal investigation. Power and money played a part but to completely fail to even consider the religious justification is, by the left’s new definition of the word, racist.
So the people who could have saved the souls of thousands of girls are lying racists, which puts them one shahada away from being lying, racist Muslims. Worse, they aided and abetted wide scale, organized gang rape. They should be in jail along with the rapists.
LeftisruiningCanada says
“He is denying race has anything to do with the rape gangs for exactly the same reason he (or his peers) overlooked their existence; fear of being called a racist. ”
Bingo. Bar tender, pour DHazard a drink of whatever he wants.
Politicianophobia says
Make it a double.
jihadiskullsmasher says
Don’t trust the lying british media.You know if they label a white person a racist, bigot, islamaphobe, white supremacist etc that the person they are slandering is a decent truth telling patriot. The msm and authorities are terrified that their treason to the British people will be exposed.