Celebrating the values of our new overlords and preparing the people for what is coming.
“Woman in a Hijab Stars in Hair Product Advertisement for L’Oreal,” by Victoria Friedman, Breitbart, January 18, 2018:
L’Oréal Paris UK has cast a woman who wears an Islamic headscarf as a model in a hair care product campaign.
Youtuber and Instagram personality Amena Khan called the L’Oréal campaign, launched Monday, “game changing” for showcasing a woman who completely covers her hair in the hair care advertisement.
“How many brands are doing things like this? Not many. They’re literally putting a girl in a headscarf – whose hair you can’t see – in a hair campaign,” she told the British edition of Vogue.
The fashion magazine applauded the “conversations” the ad will “provoke”, saying that L’Oréal has now “democratised” its “Worth It” messaging.
“Whether or not your hair is on display it doesn’t affect how much you care about it,” Ms. Khan says in her portion of the one minute-ad which featured other “diverse British ambassadors and influencers”.
L’Oréal Paris UK General Manager Adrien Koskas called the commercial a “disruptive campaign for the haircare market”….
George says
Lots of luck to L’Oreal in competition with sellers of hair care products that actually use visuals of hair as salient characteristics.
mortimer says
A hair ad without any hair visible.
Bill says
Virtue signaling. It is laughable.
But if the point of it were simply to advertise to a new market, I would be fine with it. However, it is really part of the social conditioning to make everyone accept and then adopt Islam and its doctrines.
gravenimage says
Grimly true, Bill.
CRUSADER says
Selling a lifestyle, isn’t that right, Graven? That’s the real thrust of commercial marketing.
Particularly if it is about fashion.
Advertising often is about selling an image to follow….making changes in one’s life to fit into what is being proffered….
gravenimage says
That anyone would be enticed by this image is grotesque. This only works if someone is a ‘virtue signalling’ tool.
I hope this backfires, though–the public may not be as dhimmified as L’Oreal thinks.
Unknown says
Yes, it’s laughable but it is also the mirror of what is happening on UK.
Z says
Nothing about this makes sense
Garfield says
Unless you’re some kind of sicko globalist wanting to propagandize the majority to bow down to a minority…whose beliefs are SUPREMACIST in nature. Then it makes sense.
gravenimage says
Woman in a hijab stars in hair product advertisement for L’Oreal
………………………
Imply that you have lovely hair–and if you show it to anyone, you are a filthy whore…
I would ask if L’Oreal has lost their minds, but we don’t really need an answer to that question.
VRWC member77 says
graven,
Would you agree with the best response being to inform every woman who cares to listen about this ad and to boycott L’Oreal products? They may consume their products without knowledge of the ad. If they’re told about it with context they may stop buying the product. Idiots like L’Oreal will get the message or they will continue down their path of fire. Either one works for me.
gravenimage says
I think everyone should contact L’Oreal and tell them what they think of this insanity.
Here is their Hair department in the United States:
Hair
Phone: 1-800-631-7358
Monday – Friday
9:00 AM – 7:00 PM ET
Here’s contact information in France:
L’Oréal International
41, Rue Martre
92217 Clichy Cedex France
+33(0) 1 47 56 70 00
I couldn’t find an email, but maybe someone else can do some research.
Garfield says
Exactly! The are trying to normalise the idea of women as chattel…and as you said filthy whores if they don’t cover their hair.
Its sick. They’re saying see? Women covered in bags are great! You can be stylish and feminine with a bag on your head. See, it doesn’t mean you’re subjugated under a barbaric pile of lies and controlled by men! Its fun to be Islamic!
Now if they would just add some further advice: ladies! Don’t forget to cut your daughters clitoirs off!!
CRUSADER says
Women ARE chattel.
Says so in the Holys–t Quoran…
Flavius Claudius Iulianus says
Now there’s new name for a L’Oreal product line: Chattel.
PRCS says
Chattel!
Good one.
Save Europe says
Well, as their ads’ slogans always say – ‘ because they’re worth it…’
CRUSADER says
Well, they are going for the burqa soon across Turkey, so the fashionable cover girl look is needing to broaden across borders and cultural horizons…..
It’s another way to make women into houris for jihadists to appreciate and feel at home….
Frank Anderson says
IMAGINATION!!! “Seen one, Seen ’em all.”
gravenimage says
It’s often said that what ads do is not sell products, but sell image or lifestyles.
So they are going for “Islamic sh*thole” here…
The only way anyone can consider this attractive is if they are more concerned with virtue signalling than anything else.
Of course, this ad campaign may well tank–that no one will want what they are *really* selling. One can only hope so…
CRUSADER says
GravenImage ~
I like how presidential you sound with your masterful choice of verbiage to describe “Islamic holes” 🙂
I will adamantly add this to my own lexicon.
Andy says
We in the west will ALL be in the grave if the Islamic SHITHOLES have there way!!!!
We better stop being polite and politically correct.
Brennan Kingsland says
The epitome of political correctness and social justice…AKA stupidity!
Champ says
Loreal the hijab is bondage so why would you want to support slavery? Bad move!
Champ says
Newsflash Loreal: slavery has been abolished!
Chand says
But Champ, in many places Christian and Hindu/Sikh women cover their heads too. Is it an issue of ‘bondage’ or ‘slavery’ then too?
Ecosse1314 says
Is it imposed on them within the Hindu /Christian communities
gravenimage says
Chand knows full well that Muslim women have been “Honor Killed” for not wearing Hijab. Does he have a word of criticism for this? Don’t hold your breath…
Champ says
Hey Nincompoop, spare me your inane defense of islam. Your question is too stupid to even bother with. Get lost.
Chand says
No, Champ, you dumbo, head scarves are not forced on ALL Muslim women who happen to don them. Many do so out of sheer choice. And maybe to defy the Infidels or to differentiate themselves from non Muslims.
I am not defending Islam. I don’t give a crap if it or all other religions goes down the tube. I am defending the rights of humans to wear whatever they bloody well want.
Dimwits like you cannot stop them.
Champ says
Chand the clown, your reading comprehension is deplorable …
I never stated that ..”head scarves are not forced on ALL Muslim women who happen to don them.”
This fiction is your own head trash. So own it, dumb-ass.
But there’s no getting around the fact that the hijab represents slavery to those whom are awake and with their brains still intact, so of course I am NOT referring to you. I do not expect you to comprehend this concept even in the slightest.
As to your defending islam you do so perhaps unwittingly; nevertheless, it’s true that you do–which only adds to your profound stupidity.
gravenimage says
Chand wrote:
No, Champ, you dumbo, head scarves are not forced on ALL Muslim women who happen to don them…
……………………
Notice that the appalling Chand has not a word of criticism for Muslims forcing women to wear head scarves. Just sickening.
Marina says
L’Oreal was my favorite brand. But I am going to quit buying.
gravenimage says
Write them and tell then what you think of this sick ad campaign.
tim gallagher says
I agree with the comments above about the insanity of the maker of hair care products having an advert where the hair is covered. You couldn’t make this insane stuff up. More alarming is the first sentence by Robert about our future “overlords”. God, I hope not. I know Muslims want to take over and dominate the world and kill and oppress all non-Muslims, but even though I often get pessimistic about our future, I generally think enough people will wake up in time and absolutely smash barbaric, evil Islam. I certainly hope so. I hate seeing the sort of caving in to Islam which this L’Oréal ad represents. It’s pathetic.
CRUSADER says
How is that to happen, Tim Gallagher?
If Islam infiltrates as it has, and there are growing adherents in most sectors of society, they will side with their ummah.
If somehow we in the West go into 1492 Spanish mode, and kick them out, that might be great, but then they will threaten Dirty Bombs and Nuke Strikes and all sorts of mayhem the way Tet Offensive hit us in VC land…. Coercing many of our leaders to capitulate in some manner, to compromise and relent.
If, while under the policing gun, some go underground and hide out while practicing their evil ideology:
How do you monitor Muslims? They look like everybody else, particularly when practicing taqiyya.
Tricky stuff.
Better not to have let so many in to begin with.
Better that ObinLaden didn’t want to conduct warfare against the far enemy, as it inspired the quickening of the pace against the West…. clicking the Muslim Brotherhood clock earlier….
even though much has been set up over these past decades while we in the West have been
sucking our thumbs and thinking the Crusades were long over.
DEUS VULT
+++++++++
Stacy Girl says
There are too many invaders throughout the West now. Something very big—9/11–resulted in even MORE islamo-invading because we had to prove WE weren’t at war with THEM. Honestly, I believe Trump was elected as a counter to this madness. The media are the enemy. Thank God for Robert Spencer.
Save Europe says
Don’t be so pessimistic. We will win. We have the majority and control of the essential ‘weps.’
Garfield says
+1
tim gallagher says
Thanks for your responses. I do feel pretty pessimistic about our prospects of winning this war against Islam, CRUSADER. When I read this report about the L’Oréal advert, I was struck by, and alarmed by, the great campaigner against Islam, Robert Spencer, someone I admire a lot, actually mentioning Muslims as our future “overlords”. But, if enough people do wake up, I still believe we can win. Maybe I just have to believe that. We can’t give up. Of course, the answer is to keep Muslims out. Avoid all the trouble they so obviously bring. As you say, “better to have not let so many in in the first place”. I woke up in the early 2000’s and have been writing to our Australian politicians telling them to end Muslim migration and giving them the quotes from the Koran calling for Muslims to murder non-Muslims because I’m convinced many politicians know absolutely nothing about Islam. I don’t think I’ve had much effect so far, but we can’t just give up. As you say, Stacy Girl, God bless Robert Spencer. And I hope you’re right, Save Europe, that we will win. What a nightmare future it’ll be if we don’t.
gravenimage says
Tim, Robert Spencer’s reference to “overlords” likely come from the cartoon show The Simpsons, where the weasely newscaster Kent Brockman says of invading Sci Fi ants that he “welcomes our new insect overlords”.
There *are* a lot of dhimmis, but Robert Spencer’s reference is ironic, and is *not* a call for surrender.
We must all stand up against the incursions of Islam.
tim gallagher says
gravenimage, your interpretation is no doubt right. No- one is fighting harder against evil Islam than Robert Spencer. I’m sure he’ll never give up the fight. When I read the article, I just read the bit about the “overloads” and the new order and thought, God, even Robert feels pessimistic about the outcome sometimes. Which wouldn’t surprise me given the barbaric Islamic crap he has to report on day after day and the lack of progress the fight against Islam seems to make a lot of the time. I guess the “overlords” are the Muslims and their supporters amongst the left-wing fascist brigade. Anyway, the fight goes on. No doubt he was being ironic. I didn’t think for one moment that Robert would ever surrender. I do sometimes wonder how he has the energy to do all the work he does (as in, the blog, the books, the TV interviews and speeches) but it’s great that he does have such energy. It’s a great gift to have.
gravenimage says
Thanks for your reply, Tim. Don’t despair!
Jf says
Lets change the Loreal slogan, “Because I’m worth it” to “Because my testimony is worth half of a man’s. And I’m persecuted if I show the outside world my hair”.
CRUSADER says
Because being a “houri” for Allah is worth it?
Garfield says
+1
Northern Virginiastan says
British Vogue applauds because L’Oreal Paris UK is a major advertiser.
Save Europe says
That’s possibly why that idiot, Macron, visited the UK yesterday. I get it now!!! His Wife-Grandmother probably utilises L’Oreal, I’d say.
Bev says
Hey L’Oreal who is the rocket scientist behind this insane ad. First the hijab is nothing but a symbol of oppression and submission. 2nd you can’t see the hair. Does anyone in mgmt have even a slight clue at the way Islam (just so you know is an ideology, not a race) treats women and children. You might want to look it up. STOP MAKING OPPRESSION SEXY.
Older Canadian says
I have never boycotted a company before.
But this L’Oreal’s endorsement of one of the most abusive, hideous, cruelest, mind controlling symbol against women, ever created by man, has done it for me.
Dapto says
L’Oreal’s Advertising the public will never have to use our products again if you wear a headscarf.
Older Canadian says
How insensitve to the poor women in Iran, who are risking their lives for the freedom to not to have their hair hidden.
Can you just image how the Iranian women will feel when they find out, and they will find out about this ad. It will be a real kick in the gut to them. How sad.
PRCS says
Excellent point, old guy.
Wonder if L’Oreal advertises in Iran.
Save Europe says
+1
Isabella says
I am disgusted by L’Oreal. Not buying the brand anymore. I cannot support the glorification of woman submission.
Annie Oakley says
I am forced to conclude that her hair must look like she combs it with hand grenades.
Cheer Bear Girl says
LOL!
Save Europe says
….which came from Sweden…..
Cheer Bear Girl says
This stupid Ad doesn’t inspire me to buy any of their products. I am a woman who hates to wear make up anyway. I won’t buy their garbage if they’re promoting submission to Islam rulers.
Peter says
Every girlfriend I’ve had has looked much better with less makeup on.
I think most men would think likewise.
Save Europe says
Agreed Peter ?
LeftisruiningCanada says
The next phase of the campaign will focus on only showing your fabulous glossy flowing hair to your husband –
“Loreal, the best a man can get”
Peter says
Maybe L’Oreal should go into the dirty laundry business.
MFritz says
“Hair today, haram tomorrow.”
As if L’Oreal – and anything it represents – would EVER be approved by the bearded old men with the medieval world view.
Frank Anderson says
“TELL THE TRUTH, REVEREND!”
PRCS says
The first comment at Breitbart is “Behead and Shoulders”.
MFritz says
L’Oreal – Coming soon to a shithole country near you!
LeftisruiningCanada says
😀
gravenimage says
That comment is brilliant.
Champ says
At the risk of this being a bad business move, at least no one can accuse Loreal of ‘islamophobia’ …hey they know what’s important / sarc.
MFritz says
I wonder how much money L’Oreal makes in countries such as Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran, Saudi Arabia and Somalia.
gravenimage says
You aren’t wrong:
“L’Oreal targets doubling turnover in Middle East”
http://gulfnews.com/business/companies/l-oreal-targets-doubling-turnover-in-middle-east-1.2015933
Champ says
Many here have already decided not to buy Loreal due to this campaign …so time will tell if this was a good business decision.
Charlie Martel says
OK that’s my network signed up to the L’Oreal boycott!
Peter says
Fast forward to 2022
Iranian woman wins Miss World Contest wearing full burka.
Judges comment on how beautiful she is though never having seen one uncovered inch of her body.
OIC spokesperson declares … “It’s about bloody time”
gravenimage says
+1
Stacy Girl says
As a woman, I find it ridiculous that women in pink kitty hats “fight” for rights alongside Linda Sarsour.
Cruise over to L’Oreal’s site. The CEO is a French male. Does he know what a no-go zone is? There’s a woman wearing a shirt that says, “Strong is the New Pretty.” What a crock. Strong is Pamela Geller, Ayan Hirsi Ali, Brigitte Gabriel. Instead of lifting the veil, they wrap it around twice. As a regular purchaser, I will no longer buy L’Oreal and they will know why.
MFritz says
Well, the “nasty” women of last year are also the news of last year. Or have you heard anything of Cher, Madonna and, especially, Ashley Judd? Looks like the “freedom fighters” all went for cover once Hollywood got Weinsteined.
gravenimage says
Stacy Girl wrote:
Strong is Pamela Geller, Ayan Hirsi Ali, Brigitte Gabriel.
……………….
Hear, hear, Stacy Girl!
PRCS says
And, the “Muslim beauty blogger” Amani Al-Khatahtbeh, a.k.a., Muslim Girl, in the linked YouTube vid is rejecting a Revlon award because of its brand ambassador Gal Gadot, who she says supports the “oppression of women and girls.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmLXk4fkjbs
Garfield says
The sheer hatred and supremacist LIES these vile Muslimas spew is creepy as hell, evil and moronic.
Gal Gadol seems like a normal person with a niice husband and kids. Maybe the YouTuber in the headbag is jealous.
LeftisruiningCanada says
Not because she’s Israeli then….
PRCS says
Oh, what a tangled weave they weave…
gravenimage says
Gal Gadot is Israeli–and she played Wonder Woman:
http://digitalspyuk.cdnds.net/17/20/1600×800/landscape-1495182499-gal-gadot-wonder-woman.jpg
She is a truly beautiful woman!
Alice says
Ludicrous
Billy Chickens says
They could an ad for hand and body lotion with a woman in a burqa.
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
It is a sickness that filthy mithraist christians could not appreciate the wisdom behind Islamic modest dressing, which includes covering head hair of a woman,because head hair is a reflection of pubic hair decorating that garden of enjoyment . It should,therefore, be exclusive for the husband to enjoy. covering It from Outsiders Will make woman more valueable, while Exposing It to Outsiders like that of mithraist Christian ladies Will make woman so cheap like a loaf of bread one can buy from the market. Note:sex is both physiological and psychological.
Jack Diamond says
Note: in your case it’s just psycho.
Champ says
“…the wisdom behind Islamic”
The imbecile would have us believe that there’s “wisdom” within islam, when in fact islam is completely devoid of this virtue.
Kay says
Seriously? A reflection of pubic hair?
You are one sick dude!
And if such is the case, men should also be wearing boxers on their heads!
LeftisruiningCanada says
“Exposing It to Outsiders like that of mithraist Christian ladies Will make woman so cheap like a loaf of bread one can buy from the market.
Yes, it is possible to buy women from the market in islamic countries.
Mohammad did it, so it must be the height of perfection, right?
Oh, Ibrahim…Talmud please.
gravenimage says
Yes–it is Muslims, not civilized Infidels, who sell women. *Ugh*.
gravenimage says
The vile Ibrahim itace muhammed wrote:
It is a sickness that filthy mithraist christians could not appreciate the wisdom behind Islamic modest dressing, which includes covering head hair of a woman,because head hair is a reflection of pubic hair decorating that garden of enjoyment .
…………………………..
Only Muslims like Ibrahim itace muhammed is unable to distinguish between the hair on a woman’s head and pubic hair. This would be amusing if it were not so sick.
And there is nothing “modest” about Muslim dressing. The texts of Islam note that women have to cover themselves to “avoid molestation”–in other words, Muslim men rape, and cover signals that Muslimahs are owned by Muslim men and are not to be raped–it also makes clear which women *are* fair game for rape.
I guess he means that there is “wisdom” in forced veiling for rapist Muslims.
But it is rape that is filthy, not rejecting it.
And needless to say, Ibrahim itace muhammed has never backed up his claims that Christianity is “mithraist”, and he never will.
More:
It should,therefore, be exclusive for the husband to enjoy.
…………………………..
We believe that women have free agency, beyond what some Muslim man has paid for them.
More:
covering It from Outsiders Will make woman more valueable,
…………………………..
Civilized people believe that women are *intrinsically* of value, regardless of what savage Muslims might think.
More:
while Exposing It to Outsiders like that of mithraist Christian ladies Will make woman so cheap like a loaf of bread one can buy from the market.
…………………………..
Only Muslims think that a woman being allowed to feel the sun and wind on her hair is “cheap”, but lauds vicious Muslims who would rape them. There is no morality in Islam. *Ugh*.
More:
Note:sex is both physiological and psychological.
…………………………..
Well, that is just bizarre, from someone whose creed tells that women can be raped, that pedophiles can marry little children, that if women don’t consent to sex that they can be beaten or “Honor Killed”.
When he refers to the psychological aspects of sex for women, he does not mean love, but pure terror.
Or–given how common FGM is in Islam, perhaps he is not referring to the women at all, but just Muslim men.
After all, they will feel so traumatized if their wives can live freely that they will have to “Honor Kill” them, and then they will only be able to have sex with the corpse for the next six hours before they have to find a new victim. *Ugh*.
Chand says
“………………head hair is a reflection of pubic hair decorating that garden of enjoyment.”
Wo! First time I’m coming across this!
Now where did this come from, Ibrahim? The Koran? Missed that part! Erotic poetry, more like………….
Problem is many women are clean shaving their ‘garden of delight’ these days…………….
No, Ibrahim, they are not ‘reflecting’ anything. Hair evolved for some biological advantage naturally, to protect, signal, attract mates, spread pheromones, etc.
And don’t be too sure about the ‘garden of delight’ thing. It can also become the GATE TO HELL!!
gravenimage says
Chand wrote:
And don’t be too sure about the ‘garden of delight’ thing. It can also become the GATE TO HELL!!
……………………….
And Chand reveals what a misogynist creep he is…
Eur says
In the West we are watering the tree from which muslims will hang us.
Sarah says
I’ve always voted with my money and my feet. Its the only way to send the message, these days. And I use several L’Oreal products on a daily basis. Not anymore.
You can have your toner, night cream, BB cream, mascara and eyeshadow, L’Oreal. I am happy to swear right here, right now, on a stack of bibles that I’ll never spend another cent on your filthy products.
Good luck flogging beauty care to women who can’t even show it off, I wonder how that’ll work out for you in the long run?
John says
Hala hair Products, Blacklisted now from us.
John says
halal
Nora says
Presumably this logic can quite appropriately be extended to other items e.g. an ad for an exquisite antique table can only be pictured covered by a tablecloth.
And buying a house? Not allowed to see a picture of of it first
FYI says
Well,let’s listen to one of the testimonies…
“Before, I used to love to go out and show off my lovely hair.Now,after application of L’oreal hair care products burned my scalp,I have to hide the bald patches with a hijab..”
CRUSADER says
*****
Of course this is truly insane because women in Israel are exceptionally strong and respected where as women in the Muslim world are very seriously depressed culturally…
And it probably goes without saying that Gal Gadot as wonder woman is a very recent and positive icon representing the strength of women.
Just give the award to someone else who is representing beauty on the inside rather than beauty on the outside and who is not willing to make something as pure as appreciating beauty a political or religious issue.
============================================================
Muslim “Beauty” Blogger refused accepting Revlon Award from GAL GADOT !!!
Muslims never miss an opportunity to hate on the Jews. No matter how happy or light or unrelated to their endless hatred a particular thing is, they always bring their evil to the festivities. Islamic Jew-hatred – it poisons these people to the point of madness and self destruction.
Why Revilon would even bestow this ugly piece of work with a beauty award is beyond me. Ronald Perelman, call your office.
===================
Muslim beauty blogger Amani Al-Khatahtbeh, a.k.a., Muslim Girl, is rejecting a Revlon award because of its brand ambassador Gal Gadot, who she says supports the “oppression of women and girls.”
“I cannot accept this award from Revlon with Gal Gadot as the ambassador,” Amani wrote Tuesday on Instagram of the Changemaker award from Revlon’s new #LiveBoldly campaign, an initiative to celebrate diverse beauty.
“Her vocal support of the Israeli Defense Forces’ action in Palestine goes against MuslimGirl.com’s morals and values,” Amani wrote. “I can’t, in good conscience, accept this award from the brand and celebrate Gal’s ambassadorship after the IDF imprisoned a 16-year-old girl named Ahed Tamimi last month, an activist who is currently still incarcerated. I think we are in a moment where we must persist that women’s empowerment includes ALL women. From the bottom of my heart, I feel I would not embody the meaning of the Changemaker Award if I were to accept it in these circumstances.”
UGLY
not
Beauty
Politicianophobia says
Their new slogan COVER YOUR HEAD OR YOU WILL SOON BE DEAD.
Hogdude says
A sad historical note on a disappearing product from the world scene. Goodbye, L’Oréal.
RodSerling says
An advertisement that generates interest and “buzz” is more likely to be successful than one that does not. From a business perspective, it is only common sense for L’Oreal to advertise to the growing number of Muslim women in the West who wear the hijab, veil, etc. The company is making the same kind of calculation that our politicians make, i.e., that what they say or do will gain support from significant numbers of Muslims, but will not lose support from significant numbers of non-Muslims. It’s an investment. The votes, and the business, from Muslims will only increase in the coming years, and therefore political parties and businesses that want to survive have to compete for this demographic. This type of ad campaign will likely attract business from the significant growing demographic of Muslims in the West, while at the same time there is practically no risk of loss of business from significant numbers of non-Muslims. The mainstream media, which is subject to the same demographic, social, and market factors as political parties and businesses, will view them as socially progressive and give them positive coverage, i.e., free advertising. The number of female non-Muslims in the West who dislike the ad campaign, to the extent that they now won’t buy L’Oreal products, are much fewer than the number of female Muslims and left-wing progressives who will begin buying or buy more L’Oreal products.
StellaSaidSo says
You’re right, of course, RodSerling. A boycott needs to be very big indeed if it is to have an impact on a company the size of L’Oréal. Let the leftards and Muslimas buy the L’Oreal products that we now reject – after all, they need all the help they can get!
Politicianophobia says
I bra him, I do believe you are in the later stage of syphilis, the bacteria is now in your little brain. Too bad death will be next and the world will be rid of another perverted muslim.
gravenimage says
He’s got Islam on the brain–even worse than syphilis.
Del says
In future use a burka and a dummy. Don’t waste money hiring a Muslima.
Prabh108 says
Make your own shampoo at home if possible.
Hindu-American Julia Roberts works for Lancôme. In China Lancôme is forced to torture animals by amoral/immoral chandal gov’t of china – china illegally occupying Tibet which is rightfully territory of India. Gautam Buddh is not Chinese. (Dr. Elst has article entitled “Gautam Buddh is every inch the Hindu.)
(torturing animals is not science). So in some sick (no pun intended against Sikhi) way this makes sense. Why not a terrorist producing Moslem be hired too, right? Fair is fair. Hindu model Julia and this dirty Mooslee.
Hinduism produces Ahimsa.
Islam produces vehicular jihadist scumlords.
It is the ideology – Hinduism and allied creeds liberate. Islam enslaves.
More slaves alive today than at any other time in history. Time compression is a science. YogRishi Baba Ramdev compress time and make it the age of Truth now. Our milk-producing mammals and our girls are in danger. And the men go off to fight unjust wars of looting. (nutty nato – Vadakayil reveals nutty nato is private army of infamous colonial criminals Rothschild.)
Let us through power of thought put an end to slavery. Excellent online books about how to think powerful destiny altering thoughts. Divine thoughts are yellow. Angry thoughts are red. Selfish thoughts are brown. Osho states it is good to be selfish – I selfishly wish to cross pelican crossing without being hit by vehicular jihadist scum. Blavatsky reveals Hindus were in New World long before hunter-gatherers known as redindian. Earth belongs to Mahapurakh not mlecch.
Good books save lives. Bad books can destroy a person from the inside out.
Parents: please protect your children.
Headbag traces origin to greece according to Sivananda. Any girl with covered head is screaming out loud that she is a slave – unless of course she is a member of the Dharmic community of Nations or if it is very hot or very cold outside or it is special special occasion. Men do indeed don religious headdress – on special occasions, not 24 hours a day. Royalty wear dastar – ‘turban’.
DUO (Dharmic Unity Organization) to replace hopeless uno – DUO meet in park not stinky highrises of new York.
Words wed and wit: origin is VED(a)
True anti-jihadists are freedom fighters. Freedom fighters must be well educated. Earth belongs to Mahapurakh and friends of Mahapurakh. Antiquity of Veda 90 000 years +
om shanti om (Ram Ram Ram)
Please note if metaphysically bordello in sky can be ruined, then it may be possible to ethically stop what I term the “rapid reptilian reincarnation” of Civilization destroying mlecches. Then again, Islam contradicts science. So, there is probably no dirty non-veg bordello. Concept of afterlife in pseudo-religion Islam is bit demented.
Online research reveals that persons who do not meditate and pray regularly are cursed with birth in Moslem family. Let me rush home to pick up “Bliss Divine” by Sivananda.
Hindu fascism rocks!!! Svarag is best.
May all enemies of India perish.
LeftisruiningCanada says
totally wild dude, like, far out. woah.
gravenimage says
🙂
Chand says
Prabh108 says “Online research reveals that persons who do not meditate and pray regularly are cursed with birth in Moslem family.”
But then if one is born a male in a Muslim family and dies doing Jihad, he’ll be getting 72 houris in Allah’s paradise. Allah always provides, doesn’t He? So there is hope even for the lost souls who do not pray and meditate regularly!
Chand says
“Hindu fascism rocks!!!”
Yeah, rock on, Dude! Put all the bloody Muslims in the gas chamber while you are at it too……………………
Henry jones says
Now, I’m not an economics or marketing major, but don’t products sell better…when the consumer sees them?
Haynes is making an ad for ankle socks but the models will be wearing boots…
Frank Anderson says
Mr. Jones, I don’t see why we would want to give advice to people who want to destroy us and everything about us. If they did listen it would only help them finish off our liberties. Do they really care what we think, or why we think what we do?
Henry jones says
Well, my comment was directed to Loreal, not radicals. I don’t see loreal as a threat, but rather more sheep who think Islam is peaceful.
Frank Anderson says
Mr. Jones, I wonder how many WOLVES are among the collaborating sheep within the advertising activities of Loreal, reaching up to all levels that approved the campaign? It has been argued for centuries, with some substantial measure of success, that silence is consent. This advertising is more than silence. It is active in aiding, abetting, counseling and ACTING in furtherance of muslim goals all of which are contrary to the liberty that “infidels” enjoy.
Under US law, which almost certainly doesn’t apply here anyone who aids, abets, counsels or acts in furtherance of a crime is equally guilty. Read 18 United States Code Section 2. Excusing Loreal for “ignorance” is to me quite similar to excusing any collaborator, including Neville Chamberlain, for their contributions to the rise of Nazism and the fighting of WWII. Are you for or against muslim conquest? Do you support or oppose those who would support that conquest? The longer it takes to make a decision and take a stand, the more it will cost to halt that conquest. I think WWII is a perfect illustration that delay only makes the inevitable conflict worse.
gravenimage says
Frank, I’ve done some advertising work myself. The likelihood that many of these ad people know anything about Islam is slim.
Most of them have no idea, I’m sure, that this is abetting the horrors of Shari’ah. They just think they are being cool and “multicultural”.
Frank Anderson says
GI, the lawyer impulse in me goes to the language in the Gary Greenough case:
“It is well established that
[t]]he elements of a conspiracy . . . are: (1) an agreement between two or more persons, (2) an unlawful purpose, and (3) an overt act committed by one of the conspirators in furtherance of the conspiracy . . . . The existence of the conspiracy can be proved by inference evidence . . . . Direct evidence of an agreement to join a criminal conspiracy is rare, so a defendant’s assent can be inferred from acts furthering the conspiracy’s purpose. The government is not required to prove that each alleged conspirator knew all the details of the conspiracy; it is enough to establish that a defendant knew the essentials of the conspiracy . . . that the defendant intended to join or associate himself with the objective of the conspiracy . . . even if he did not join it until after its inception, and even if he played only a minor role in the total scheme ” United States v. Gary Greenough, 609 F.Supp 1090, 1093-1094 (S.D. Ala. 1985).
As I see it the ongoing muslim conquest is a effort to subvert and overthrow the United States Constitution and all the rights it provides. It is not necessary that the originator(s) and all who approved this advertising campaign have any particular knowledge, only that they “know the essentials” and “intend to join or associate with the objective. . .” While this is a District Court opinion (explanation) it is drawn from far higher authority which is cited in the case. Opinions may differ. [The US Attorney who prosecuted this case is now the Attorney General of the United States.]
gravenimage says
Frank Anderson wrote:
As I see it the ongoing muslim conquest is a effort to subvert and overthrow the United States Constitution and all the rights it provides. It is not necessary that the originator(s) and all who approved this advertising campaign have any particular knowledge, only that they “know the essentials” and “intend to join or associate with the objective. . .”
………………………..
Frank, most of the artists I know–and, by extension, likely most of the ad people–don’t “know the essentials” of Islam *at all*.
They think Muslims are just “needy refugees”, and that the Hijab is just a ‘cute’ head covering, like a beret or a pink “pussy hat”.
Most of them assume that anyone who has issues with the Hijab are just mean ‘racists’ who don’t appreciate diversity.
For instance, this is a common poster up in the windows of bay area restaurants and shops:
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/52f93b58e4b03018f9550664/t/5830aba746c3c4d861790967/1479585619867/everyone-welcome-bazant-sml-color.jpg
Do you think the well-meaning idiot who produced this friendly, smiling image–and most of those who post it–have *any idea* the threat Islam poses? I can assure you that they haven’t got a clue.
They are more ignorant than evil.
Frank Anderson says
Always with greatest respect, “Ignorance is no excuse. . .” “Deliberate ignorance constitutes knowledge of the truth.” How much evil is acceptable when diluted by ignorance? Making excuses is a major contributor to more ignorance and indecision. Holding people to account for their support to those who would enslave or kill us starts with the famous “Light one candle rather than curse the darkness.”.
gravenimage says
Frank, I’m fighting this suicidal ignorance all the time.
I think education is the answer, though–not prosecution. Remember, a large part of the population in every country in the West–actually the majority in many places–is in denial over the threat of Islam.
Frank Anderson says
GI, I think you have hit on part of the answer. I have a personal problem with people routinely threatening to kill or paralyze me by following too close. (Depending on road conditions no less than 20 feet for every 10 miles per hour). Firearms kill about 30 people a day in the US, out of more or less 300 million firearms; motor vehicles kill over 90 people a day with about 100 million vehicles. Thus I contend motor vehicles are at least 6 (maybe 9) times more deadly than firearms.
Imagine the shock of a police officer and a deputy sheriff when I handed them a copy of THE state law explaining that slowing down when an unsafe condition exists is the perfectly lawful response to a felony assault with a deadly weapon, that these officers had just perpetrated on recorded video and audio. It appears that neither of these “law enforcement officers” had ever heard of the law. Handing them that copy of the law takes away their excuse if they file false, illegal and ungrounded charges after threatening me with deadly force, and exposes them to every legal consequence of their violation of law. Informing these “uninformed” deliberately ignorant advertising morons of the evil they are promoting takes away their excuse if they continue. Now, how to “educate” them when daily news shows the violence and evil of islam. Have they never watched the news?
gravenimage says
There is no doubt that the denial runs deep, Frank.
But sites like Jihad Watch *are* slowly waking people up to the threat of Islam, and this is something we can all help with. Just hope it is fast enough.
I have enjoyed our exchange, in any case.
Politicianophobia says
Dear solid, sweet Frank Anderson, I do hope you have a Happy New Year.
Frank Anderson says
Pol. . ., In more than 60 years, more than half of which I have been (and still am) a [retired] lawyer very few people, especially my clients have said sweet in reference to me. I am a believer in the wisdom of “don’t get ulcers: GIVE THEM to those who deserve them.” Damn being anyone’s doormat. Having been legally dead for about 2 hours and near death a second time with a blood clot in my lung, every day is a New Year worth celebrating and seeking ways to show our Father my gratitude for His loaned gift in trust.
gravenimage says
Happy New Year to you both!
Muslim2018 says
In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.
Jihad Watch authors and supporters can continue to frustrate themselves against the inevitable. It shows that Allah is real and no matter what you say or do Islam will prove itself as superior and true. For truth is always superior to falsehood and darkness. All of the bad things that some Muslim groups are doing in the name of Islam is a test for the believers and a purging period. In that I mean, the terrorists and their brutality are creating dialogue between Muslims and non Muslims throughout the world. Those who are sincere and honest will search into Islam and embrace the truth; the insincere and the liars will read into Islam and reject the truth as their hearts are sealed, then you have the fools who are sheep, they bleat, follow others blindly and are led astray. Let’s reflect on what Allah, Glory be to Him the Most High teaches.
Surah 61:8, “They want to extinguish the light of Allah with their mouths, but Allah will perfect His light, although the disbelievers dislike it.”
All praises be to Allah, Islam as a way of life and the believing Muslims in Allah are free and abhor the killing of unarmed combatants or the killing of civilians (Muslims and non Muslims) indiscriminately. May Allah deal with swiftly all those who tarnish the name of Islam through their misdeeds. Ameen.
Yes so you may “jump high and jump low” Allah will raise from among us believers who will contribute to the good of mankind through Islam. The best thing for many of you to do is visit a masjid or visit practicing Muslims, get to know them on a human level. Visit a masjid, speak with Muslims instead of being angry at your computer screens. I invite those with an ounce of justice and sincerity in your hearts to simply look into Islam, hear what Muslims are saying. You may start here.
http://www.whyislam.org
Champ says
What a truckload of taqiyya we have here …
And your ‘prophet’ was an evil pervert, so you can’t make a silk purse out of a sow’s ear.
Not even SORTA interested.
tt says
All half-truths spiced with plagiarised Jewish verses.
StellaSaidSo says
‘…simply look into Islam…’
We looked into Islam. We have seen the hate that is in the Koran. And we hear what Muslims are saying.
That is why we loathe Islam.
Jack Diamond says
Tell us specifically which killing of unarmed or civilian NON-MUSLIMS you abhor and which Muslims and groups (and Muslim countries who might support them) who have done this, you abhor and condemn, in the name of Islam? Please provide a list.
Instead of pointing people to some da’wa propaganda website, answer the question yourself. Then enlighten us on the following:
“It is reported on the authority of Sa’bb Jaththama that the Prophet of Allah when asked about the women and children of the polytheists being killed during the night, said, they are from them.”
–Sahih Muslim bk019,n4321
“No Muslim should be killed in {equality of punishment} for killing a kafir (disbeliever).”
–Sahih Bukhari v9,bk83,n50
“A believer will not be killed for an infidel.”
–Abu Dawud bk39n4491
“There are no animals viler than those who do not believe {in Islam} and remain unbelievers.”
–Qur’an s.8:55
“Those who reject truth {Islam} among the People of the Book and among the polytheists will abide in Hellfire, they are the worst of creatures (of anything in creation}.”
–s.98:6
“You will not find any people that believe in Allah and the Last Day loving those who oppose Allah and His Messenger, even though they were their fathers, sons, brothers or kindred.”
–s. 58:22
“O you who believe! Do not take the Jews and Christians {People of the Book} for friends of allies (awliya). They are friends to each other, and the one among you that turns to them is one of them {an apostate from Islam}.”
–s.5:51
“Muhammad is God’s apostle. Those who follow him are ruthless to the unbelievers but merciful to one another.”
–s.48:29
Now, explain the meaning of this verse to us:
“Fight {qital, qatal ‘kill, maim, slaughter,massacre’, aka KILL} those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which has been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the Religion of Truth {Islam} (even if they are) among the People of the Book, until they pay the jizya with willing submission and feel themselves subdued.”
–s.9:29
Explain why Allah & Muhammad here wants to “fight to kill” people simply based on what they believe or don’t believe concerning Allah & Muhammad. Explain why those people have to pay a ransom for their lives {jizya} and what living under submission exactly means according to Islamic law.
Explain a connection between this and Sahih Bukhari v.1bk2n25:
“Allah’s apostle said, ‘I have been ordered (by Allah) to fight against the people until they testify that none has the right to be worshipped (but Allah) and that Muhammad is Allah’s apostle, and offer the prayers perfectly and give the obligatory charity, so if they perform all that, then they save their lives and their property from me {i.e. otherwise they don’t}.”
LeftisruiningCanada says
“The best thing for many of you to do is visit a masjid or visit practicing Muslims, get to know them on a human level. Visit a masjid, speak with Muslims instead of being angry at your computer screens. I invite those with an ounce of justice and sincerity in your hearts to simply look into Islam, hear what Muslims are saying. You may start here. ”
Why would we go and find some muslims to lie to us (for allahs sake of course) when we can and do listen to what mohammad has been saying for 1400 years?
He lies too, but it saves needing a middleman.
gravenimage says
Muslim2018 wrote:
In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.
………………………….
Well, this answers one minor question–I had wondered if “Muslim2017” was going to update to “Muslim2018”, continue to post as “Muslim2017”, or just disappear. Is he pretending to be modern here? Nah…he still adheres to a dark ages creed.
More:
Jihad Watch authors and supporters can continue to frustrate themselves against the inevitable.
………………………….
In other words: Surrender, Infidels. Resistance is futile.
Or so “Muslim2018” would like us to believe.
More:
It shows that Allah is real and no matter what you say or do Islam will prove itself as superior and true.
………………………….
Some silly Infidels running an ad featuring a Muslimah in a headbag proves that Islam is superior? How, exactly?
And no–civilized Infidels do *not* consider “marrying” children, raping and abusing women, and mass slaughtering unbelievers to be superior to our civilized values. Only thuggish Mohammedans think like this. *Ugh*.
More:
For truth is always superior to falsehood and darkness.
………………………….
Note what “Muslim2018” considers “darkness”–opposing the rape of women and children and mass murder of unbelievers.
Islam is not just immoral; it is the very inversion of morality.
More:
All of the bad things that some Muslim groups are doing in the name of Islam is a test for the believers and a purging period. In that I mean, the terrorists and their brutality are creating dialogue between Muslims and non Muslims throughout the world.
………………………….
Notice that “Muslim2018” does not say, exactly, what those “bad things” might be.
Is he referring Jihad terrorism? That is what he implies. He does not, notably, say that he any intention of trying to *stop* his pious coreligionists from waging violent Jihad against us, nor does he say that we have the right to defend against Jihad.
And what sort of “dialog” does Jihad terror create between Muslims and non-Muslims? The message of Jihad is that Infidels must submit to Islam lest we want to be raped or murdered–does “Muslim2018” have a problem with this message? It does not sound like it.
And, really, how could he? This is orthodox Islam, and has been ever since the days of the “Prophet”.
More:
Those who are sincere and honest will search into Islam and embrace the truth; the insincere and the liars will read into Islam and reject the truth as their hearts are sealed, then you have the fools who are sheep, they bleat, follow others blindly and are led astray. Let’s reflect on what Allah, Glory be to Him the Most High teaches.
………………………….
In other words, we are to look at the oppression and sanguinary violence of Islam and consider it something good. This is only true if we ourselves are sadists; not if we are civilized people.
And what happens if we reject this “truth”? Well, we know what Islam has in store of us then, don’t we?
More:
Surah 61:8, “They want to extinguish the light of Allah with their mouths, but Allah will perfect His light, although the disbelievers dislike it.”
………………………….
What do the subsequent Ayats have to say? Here’s Qur’an 61:11-13:
“It is that you believe in Allah and His Messenger and strive in the cause of Allah with your wealth and your lives. That is best for you, if you should know.”
“He will forgive for you your sins and admit you to gardens beneath which rivers flow and pleasant dwellings in gardens of perpetual residence. That is the great attainment.”
“And you will obtain another favor that you love – victory from Allah and an imminent conquest; and give good tidings to the believers.”
…
“Striving in the cause of Allah” means waging violent Jihad. And those who murder Infidels will have their sins forgiven and be admitted to paradise, where they can rape Houris for eternity.
And the last verse speaks for itself–when pious Muslims wage violent Jihad and conquer the unbelievers, they gain victory.
More:
All praises be to Allah, Islam as a way of life and the believing Muslims in Allah are free and abhor the killing of unarmed combatants or the killing of civilians (Muslims and non Muslims) indiscriminately. May Allah deal with swiftly all those who tarnish the name of Islam through their misdeeds. Ameen.
………………………….
“Indiscriminately”, huh? And if they murder them in the name of Islam and its spread? That’s what the vicious “Prophet” Muhammed did, as “Muslim2018” well knows. Then it is worthy of emulation–nothing more so.
More:
Yes so you may “jump high and jump low” Allah will raise from among us believers who will contribute to the good of mankind through Islam.
………………………….
What could possibly be better for mankind than that bloody oppression of unbelievers? From the perspective of pious Muslims who want to enslave us, absolutely nothing.
I’m not familiar with the phrase “jump high and jump low”, but its meaning is pretty clear. In other words, Muslims can do *anything* to Infidels to try to get them to convert, from whitewashing Islam to threats and violence. *Ugh*.
More:
The best thing for many of you to do is visit a masjid or visit practicing Muslims, get to know them on a human level. Visit a masjid, speak with Muslims instead of being angry at your computer screens. I invite those with an ounce of justice and sincerity in your hearts to simply look into Islam, hear what Muslims are saying.
………………………….
Listen to a load of Da’wa–this may help you forget those 32,000+ Jihad terror attacks since 9/11–or maybe not…
More:
You may start here.
http://www.whyislam.org
………………………….
And so I did. Not too long after 9/11 I ran into a table illegally set up in a downtown subway station in San Francisco. It was manned by a couple of Iranian Muslims. One was bearded and threatening, and did nothing but scowl at me, an unveiled woman–but the other one was clean-shaven and superficially approachable.
I had just been educating myself about Islam, reading the Qur’an and Hadiths and learning about the life of the “Prophet”. I decided to see what they had to say.
He started off with the usual “Islam is a religion of peace” DTaqiyya, then he learned that I knew more about Islam than he thought. I decided it was impossible to cover everything, so I focused on two issues–the role of women in Islam and the Muslim “Jesus”.
First he started off with the claim that women are equal to men in Islam–but then I cited Qu’ran 4:34, where men are superior to woman and can beat their wives if they are disobedient. He acknowledged this, and back-pedaled, saying that men and women are “equal” but have “different roles”–and that entails their being beaten and even “Honor Killed” if they disobey their husbands. He affirmed that this was perfectly Islamic. He had nothing critical to say about this.
I then broached the Muslim “Jesus” (really, “Isa”). First, he nattered on about how Islam “respects Jesus”. I asked if the Muslim Jesus was not quite a bit different from the Christian Jesus–that he was not the Savior, that he was not a healer or peacemaker, and that–most of all–his role in the last days was to *kill Christians*.
I had no idea what he would say to this–I assumed he would find some way to weasel out of acknowledging it–instead, to my surprise, he got excited, saying “well, of course, because they [Christians] lied about him!”.
I was disgusted by this point, given what this pious Muslim had openly admitted about his foul creed. He seemed quite happy, though, and plied me with pamphlets before I left. He seemed unaware that I was just further repulsed by Islam.
So–I agree with “Muslim2018”. Talking to Muslims–so long as you know enough about Islam that you can’t be snowed by Taqiyya–can be *very* enlightening. *Ugh*.
LeftisruiningCanada says
nice break down.
always good that there is a response to posts like that one.
gravenimage says
Many fine replies to the Taqiyya-spewing “Muslim2018”.