Theresa May’s government is set to surrender to European Union demands that mass, uncontrolled immigration continues for years after Brexit, an official familiar with talks has revealed.
A major survey found that the UK public voted for Brexit because of the EU’s reckless immigration policy, so given May’s surrender, Brexit now seems counterintuitive. The British public is now stuck with a bill induced by Brexit in addition to an exorbitant bill stemming from continued irresponsible immigration policies, based on the EU’s misguided view that the swarm of migrants from the Middle East and Africa will somehow fill a future population vacuum due to low birth rates. EU and the UK leaders actually believe that these migrants will assimilate, find jobs and become responsible British citizens who will start paying taxes to finance their new countries’ leftist dependence on social welfare.
The trouble is the quality of those coming in: a significant number of Muslim migrants subscribe to a set of laws (Sharia) that are contrary to democratic institutions; they have also demonstrated an unwillingness to work. Most have remained on the welfare system years after entering Europe and expect that they will be cared for in years to come, in accordance with the principles of the jizya. They are bankrupting Europe, not to mention causing escalating costs of security, given threats of jihad and the surge in violent crimes.
The UK is doomed with Theresa May, who is in way over her head.
“Source: Appeaser Theresa to Surrender to the EU on Free Movement During Post-Brexit ‘Transition,’” by Liam Deacon, Breitbart, February 22, 2018:
Theresa May’s government is set to surrender to European Union demands that mass, uncontrolled immigration continues for years after Brexit, an official familiar with talks has revealed.
David Davis, the Secretary of State for Brexit, is expected to give a statement to Parliament today outlining his government’s official response to the EU’s latest negotiating guidelines for the so-called ‘transition’ period.
According to a British official who spoke to Politico, the Government will not reject, explicitly, EU demands that all new arrivals during the ‘transition’ are given the same rights as those coming before Brexit day — despite Mrs. May’s promises that Free Movement will officially end in 2019.
The ‘transition period’ was initially touted as lasting for two years, but recent reports suggest the government will propose making it open-ended, with no specific end date fixed.
Britain had initially wanted the cut-off date for new migrants being given full rights to be the 29th of March last year, when Article 50 was triggered, to stop a last-minute rush of new arrivals…..
RichardL says
you make it sound as if Theresa May would act against her own wishes. Nothing could be further from the truth: May wants to make sure that there is absolutely no turning back the clock and the UK stays forever the Mohammedan hellhole it already is.
Jayell says
Theresa the Appeasa!
Halal Bacon says
No tubby toast for her if she doesn’t from her islamic puppet masters
Charlie Martel says
EU migration is not the problem. The problem is mass Muslim migration. Who is confusing the two, and why?
brane pilot says
EU has and intends to maintain open borders with the Third World.
England has open borders with the EU.
The EU demands that those borders remain open, so the Third World can migrate across Europe to England.
Ecosse1314 says
I think your brain is pilotless in this post. There is no such county as England negotiating brexit. It is the UK government.
Westman says
I can’t find where Charlie says England negotiated Brexit. He is absolutely correct that the “migrants” first choice of locations in the UK will be England, particularly London.
LeftisruiningCanada says
Scot’s pride is a fine thing, but perhaps bringing it up here is misplaced.
Ecosse1314 says
Rubbish we have things like ports and airports in Scotland Wales and N Ireland.This site is meant to be about accuracy. Well treating the rest of the UK as non existent is not misplaced.It is simply wrong and inaccurate
terence steele says
its the barcelona declaration…………………………https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iIM3r-0kgrM
StellaSaidSo says
Scuttling BREXIT was always May’s intention. She is obeying her NWO globalist puppet masters.
If Britain does not demand that May step down and JRM step up, there will be no BREXIT and no freedom for Britain from the EU yoke.
IanB says
+1
Rob says
+2!
Carol (the 1st) says
Had to look up JRM but here’s an article:
https://www.change.org/p/theresa-may-mp-promote-jacob-rees-mogg-now-to-push-the-uk-towards-the-best-possible-brexit
No Muzzies Here says
Wondering why so many heads of state use all their energies to destroy the countries that elected them: Trudeau, Obama, Merkel, May. I have to conclude that they sought power precisely so that they would be able to destroy their countries.
StellaSaidSo says
They were SELECTED before they were ELECTED. If a candidate does not have the backing of the lying and cheating globalists, it is very difficult to win an election. DJT was an exception.
Jenny H says
He might have been the exception partly because he could fund his own campaign and thus was financially independent.
LeftisruiningCanada says
They either agree with it, have been bought off with something, or have been threatened with some super high tech torture for themselves or their families. Or any combo thereof.
I’m not ruling out memberships and devotions to satanic secret societies either.
And please don’t think i’m being sarcastic.
brane pilot says
When the people are sheep, the government leads them to slaughter.
This is a firm lesson of history.
MFritz says
Theresa May is a gold brick. She doesn’t want to do her work because she’s not working for the British people but for the globalists. And so she does EVERYTHING for Brexit not to continue. And as long as she and her party remain in power NOTHING will change in this regard.
Walter Sieruk says
That prime minster of England, Theresa May, when make public statements about those violent and vicious terrorist attacks on London Bridge and nearby Borough Market. She has declared this heinous religious terror attack as the outcome of “an ideology that is a perversion of Islam,” That statement shows that she didn’t do her homework. For those jihadist Muslims were putting in the practice the instruction of real, actual, non-watered down hard core Islam. As the Quran in, for example, Surah 9:123 instructs “O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you…” Running over non-Muslims with a van and then stabbing them is a very effective way of showing people who are not Muslims harshness. Also Surah 9:111 teaches “The believers fight in Allah’s Cause, they slay and are slain, they kill and are killed…” The whole foundation for the ideology of Islamic terrorism is the theology of the Quran. As seen in those two, just sited, verses from the Quran and other verses well, such as, Surah 4:89. 5:33 47:4. Teresa May also denounced “Extremism.” This type of “Extremism” is based on the Quran.
Carol (the 1st) says
I doubt these leaders are too bored or too busy to research “somewhat relevant” topics. I’m sure May follows the required homework assignments and that’s why “an ideology that is a perversion of Islam” flowed so trippingly off the tongue.
We are becoming annoying inmates on this big ball of theirs.
malcolm says
May struts around thinking she is Margaret Thatcher, reality speaks much differently.
4-6 years left to visit the once mighty England, after that the tear down of the culture and history begin in earnest. No one will want to visit after that.
Jaladhi says
Europe is gone, UK is gone,so are Canada, Australia, NZ, so one has to ask how far behind we are?? The way things are going here in the universities, media and politicians, iI am sure we are not far behind!
Wellington says
The fundamental problem remains, i.e., the refusal, for whatever indefensible reason, to understand that Western Civilization and Islam are incompatible. Thinking that they are represents the equivalent of trying to put a square peg into a circle.
Guy Forester says
Anyone that thought May was going to do the will of the people and effect the Brexit was smoking something REALLY good, man.
gravenimage says
Appeaser Theresa May surrenders to EU open immigration demands for years after Brexit
…………………
Sickening thwarting of the will of the British people.
Jack Holan says
Theresa May’s name will go down in history as the Prime Minister Who facilitated the Sun to set on the British Empire and crush all of English Culture & Society.
Do Brits know the estimated numbers it will take to support the newbys during transition if they ever assimilate and work? Look at Germany France and Sweden for guidance about that and the daily violence + criminality. Do the Brits know the added numbers will lower the services they receive??
Mark says
The worst thing is that the government has said that industry needs immigrants and after brexit they will replace European immigrants with those from Africa and South Asia (primarily Pakistan). Things will be much worse
P in America says
So she gets her big political desire. She is a war Prime Minister.
Blood, death, and hijrah jihad shall continue as Sharia rolls over the land.
Death to Islam.
Jacqueline says
Because Britain seems to be having such a hard time getting out of the European Union, I tried, via the internet, to get the name(s) of who heads the European Union. I can’t find any. The EU government doesn’t have a central location. The “members” have opted, in recent years, for Brussels, Belgium as the EU administration center. The current and past representatives sent to Brussels by the member governments are not named. According to University of Oxford Professor, Paul Craig, the EU administers five institutions (1) the European Council (2) the Council of the European Union (3), the European Parliament (4) the European Commission (5) the Court of Justice. According to Wikipedia, it costs about 2 billion dollars a year to run this shadowy government comprised of unidentified, unelected persons. To me, this is scary. No matter what anybody’s suspicions of the United Nations participants’ motives, at least they are identifiable humans. When I stop to think about it, nightly news comments reference the EU’s opinions, policies, edicts, but no name is ever associated with them.