British authorities let these Muslim rape gangs operate freely for years, because they were afraid of being called “racist” and “Islamophobic” for stopping them. This BBC story falsely claims: “The report noted that there was no evidence that police and other agencies had been reluctant to investigate amid “misplaced” concerns over political correctness or allegations of racism.” In reality, those “misplaced” concerns have been noted for years. Labour MP Sarah Champion pointed it out. In Rotherham, British officials admitted this: they “described their nervousness about identifying the ethnic origins of perpetrators for fear of being thought as racist; others remembered clear direction from their managers not to do so.”
So this report is just another whitewash of the Islamic motivation and character of the Muslim rape gangs, and that ensures that Muslim rape gang activity will continue in shattered, staggering, dhimmi Britain.
Sexual assault occurs in all cultures, but only in Islam does it have divine sanction. The Qur’an teaches that Infidel women can be lawfully taken for sexual use (cf. its allowance for a man to take “captives of the right hand,” 4:3, 4:24, 23:1-6, 33:50, 70:30). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused. And ever is Allah Forgiving and Merciful.” (33:59) The implication there is that if women do not cover themselves adequately with their outer garments, they may be abused, and that such abuse would be justified.
“Operation Sanctuary review finds adult abuse ‘extensive,'” BBC, February 23, 2018:
Vulnerable women are most likely being “extensively” abused across the UK and ministers need to urgently review sex exploitation laws, a report says.
David Spicer led a review in the wake of Operation Sanctuary which saw 18 people jailed for the sexual abuse of young women groomed in Newcastle.
He said exploitation was not being recognised in adults.
The operation identified about 700 victims in total across the Northumbria Police area, 108 in Newcastle.
The government said it would “look carefully” at Mr Spicer’s 33 recommendations, which also included a need for research into the cultural background of abusers, many of whom in the case of Sanctuary were from a “predominantly Asian or British Minority Ethnic culture or background”.
Mr Spicer, who carried out the serious case review for the Newcastle Safeguarding Adults and Children Boards, said it was clear “adults were being targeted, groomed and exploited” as well as children….
He also said the government needs to research the “profiles, motivations and cultural and background influences of perpetrators of sexual exploitation”.
In the Newcastle case, most of the men were British-born but all came from Bangladeshi, Pakistani, Indian, Iraqi, Iranian or Turkish communities.
Think tank the Quillam Foundation, which focuses on counter-extremism, said 84% of the 264 offenders convicted of grooming between 2005 and 2017 were of south Asian heritage.
Mr Spicer said the perpetrator he spoke to “displayed no regret” and “spoke in a derogatory manner about a lack of morals in British girls”.
The report noted that there was no evidence that police and other agencies had been reluctant to investigate amid “misplaced” concerns over political correctness or allegations of racism….
MFritz says
So it’s not political bias and fear of criticism, it’s ignorance, laziness and incompetence that’s hindering the British police from doing their work?
mortimer says
And… of course … the police are not HIDING, CLOAKING or DISSEMBLING their TRUE FEELINGS about the ‘RACIST’ slander that would fall upon them if they merely DISAGREE with the official policy.
Nah, police would NEVER merely pretend to agree with their bosses, would they? Police would never PRETEND to agree with the pandering politicians, would they? Police would never conceal their true feelings in order to keep their jobs, would they?
(sarc/off)
THE REPORT IS WORTHLESS and an exercise in COVERUP.
Phil Copson says
“….Police would never conceal their true feelings in order to keep their jobs, would they?….”
Funny you should say that……I asked a friend only today why he wasn’t sending out the jokes and cartoons that I used to get from him regularly, and he said that people are getting a bit nervous about what they have in their In-boxes: In particular, one friend – who had worked in admin’ for her local police force for some 20 years – read one of his jokes at work – (we’ll assume that she was on her lunch-break…) – and was seen laughing at what she had on-screen.
A colleague asked if they could share the joke, and within minutes she’d been reported as a racist, and was sacked. Her union refused to support her despite umpteen years of paying her union dues.
(A) this is a wild over-reaction, and (B) it is illogical to the point of insanity – how can anyone possibly be held responsible for the content of an unsolicited communication from a third party ?
If this is a general principle though, maybe I can turn it to advantage? all I have to do is send a really fruity one to Theresa May involving the Ayatollah Khomeini, a one-legged jockey, and a bowl of whipped-cream, and she’ll be booted out of Number 10 faster than an MP can fiddle their expenses….
Andy says
StellaSaidSo says
COMMON PURPOSE explains a lot. The UK police are infested with it, as are many other institutions and organisations in UK. And the influence of this cultural Marxist pestilence is not limited to UK.
Rob says
Because of it all, plus political head-in-sand attitudes, the UK is well on it’s way to sharia government…what became of the “Great…”?
Anne Smith says
Ignorance, laziness and stupidity have always existed in the Police Force, or as it is now called, the Police Service.
Yes, Common Purpose now exists in the upper echelons and it is impossible to get promotion without going on a CP course.
The Police always take the line of least effort in these cases and blaming the victims has almost become a way of life for them. Additionally many of these victims are not living at home but are institutionalised in children’s care homes where the care workers would rather die than be accused of racism so they are allowed to go out with highly unsuitable “escorts” in order to promote “diversity”.
J D S says
Isn’t this ridiculous…..
Fear has kept Muslims at bay for centuries…Fear of leaving islam because of death threats Now the authorities are held by FEAR of being called racist and islamophobes….What a predicament.
Get over it…Get some guts and do what the laws,you are supposed to uphold, are there for.
WorkingClassPost says
The UK media can’t not cover this story, but they still manage to hide its implications.
Just heard a mainstream radio news report which had a brief ‘interview’ with some unknown woman, who talked about broken homes and drugs/alcohol abuse (presumably relating to the victims, but even that wasn’t clear).
No mention of who gave drugs and alcohol to children and under-age girls, and certainly no mention of why.
Jayell says
“Just heard a mainstream radio news report which had a brief ‘interview’ with some unknown woman……no mention of who gave drugs and alcohol to children and under-age girls, and certainly no mention of why.”
Don’t surprise me. This was the BBC?
Jayell says
“In Rotherham, British officials admitted this: they “described their nervousness about identifying the ethnic origins of perpetrators for fear of being thought as racist; others remembered clear direction from their managers not to do so.”…..
If the UK had been invaded in 1940-41, or if Chamberlain & Co. had come to some kind of ‘understanding’ with Hitler,the Establishment (i.e., Government and associated organisations, the Education establishment, the police and whatever was left of the military establishment) and the broadcasting and news media would have had their higher ranking personnel ‘reviewed’ and maybe replaced to ensure that everyone concerned was of the ‘correct persuasion’ or at least amenable to their new Nazi masters, and behaved themselves accordingly. No doubt if they weren’t, or they didn’t, they might have encountered unexpected problems with employment or/and might have received ‘friendly’ visits from the forces of law and order to ensure that they understood rules of good citizenship, or they might have discovered that they’ve broken some law without realising or maybe upset someone who apparently mattered more than they did, and face explaining themselves to a judge.
How odd! That’s pretty well exactly what we’ve got now! And no-onde noticed the Nazi tanks invading! Or maybe they just changed their uniforms.
End PC says
The shocking but informative book “Easy Meat: Inside Britain’s Grooming Gang Scandal” by P. McLoughlin points out that
“Muslims make up around 90% of [sex] offenders from the lists of convictions, where guilt and innocence had been tested in a courtroom. But Muslims make up 5% of the population.”
Doing the Math he shows that this implies (probability speaking) that a Muslim man is 170 times more likely than a non-Muslim man to commit these sex crimes. And it has been argued – convincingly IMO – that their Islamic ideology lends itself to rationalizing these sex crimes on non-Muslim girls – their only victims.
While most Muslims don’t commit these crimes, still Britain welcomes Muslim immigrants like old friends. That’s insane.
Anne Smith says
Not all Britons welcome them.
Rob says
+1!
LeftisruiningCanada says
““predominantly Asian or British Minority Ethnic culture or background”.”
There’s one word which can replace all of that word salad while being far more useful in profiling suspects.
LeftisruiningCanada says
These collected images of the squishy-faced sex slavers is enough to make any Western man get on the war path.
Just sayin’
Center of the road says
This article is inaccurate. Most islamic countries don’t have laws against rape, just sex outside of marriage. So if a woman was raped in Dubai and reported it to the police, she would be charged with sex outside of marriage. So an uneducated muslim used to Sharia law would be in for culture shock if they immigrated to the west. Similar thing with indians (note the gang rape, arranged marriage culture in India) that immigrate (https://www.dailyo.in/voices/sexual-assault-indian-man-prabhu-ramamoorthy-harass-flight-co-passenger-las-vegas/story/1/21657.html).
If we allow them in, we need to educate them on our laws so they don’t make these mistakes.
Lydia Church says
Don’t have laws against rape? THAT is the problem! And it is still rape, so the rapists are still guilty!
And again, a woman gets raped in Dubai and reports the crime, and they charge HER with sex outside of marriage, that someone committed against her will, by violating her? (Rape!) That is another crime!
So typical, rape a woman, and then blame HER of loose morals! The man is the one with the loose morals, and he is a guilty, selfish, evil wicked sinner who trespasses against and violates a woman’s body, scarring her physically, psychologically, and emotionally for life (yes, against her will/without consent/hence the rape charge) all for a quick carnal selfish gratification (not to mention that in consensual sex, it is assumed that both will be satisfied sexually, not just the male!) that will land his fanny in hellfire!
I do agree that they need to be educated on our culture and laws before allowing them in, for any who are allowed in. They must agree first, many may not even want to come in then, all for the better in that case, in the case of those thinking they are entitled to rape women, they can crawl back down their
sh_ _ -hole.
Linda says
Mistakes, are you that brainwashed?
Jayell says
“Most islamic countries don’t have laws against rape, just sex outside of marriage.”
So most Islamic law doesn’t consider the circumstances in which an act of sexual intercourse occurs? Therefore the question of consent in immaterial? Therefore if one party decides to have sex with a second party, the second party has no right of refusal? What would be the situation in a case of homosexual rape?
LeftisruiningCanada says
There was a time, not so long ago really, when the cast of TV shows and movies and such used to have what everyone referred to as the ‘token black’ character.
After all these years of enforced cultural enrichment, affirmative action, and sheer bloody minded mass importations, it is heartening to see that even rape gangs now feel that they must include a ‘token white’ as part of their ensemble.
Bernard Bayless says
LOL! No coverup! If you believe that, I have a bridge to sell you!
LeftisruiningCanada says
Oooooh great, i need a nice bridge.
Does it look like that one from London? Always liked that one.
I need it to get to some beach front property i just bought down in Arizona, as they said something about having to cross a canal to reach it.
Jack Holan says
Just lovely, if they form an Academic Team of Cultural Anthropologists, Psychologists and whoever they figure out the WHY.
Does anyone care to venture a guess WHY this approach is doomed to failure before it’s formed? If these Academics cannot honestly describe who Populates the study this charade of Science is hocus pocus and a waste of taxpayer money.
A sure solution if ANYONE IS FOUND GUILTY GUILTY OF A CLASS 1 Felony Grooming Girls and Women as sex slaves.
Use of automatic castrations! This will end these careers.
LeftisruiningCanada says
Automatic?
You mean they have to castrate themselves?
Sounds like an appropriate punishment.
henrik jensen says
thick lye. This black man in u.k. ( name look it up ) got shot in the 90’ies govermemt reportet institutioalized racism in police. Lying shitheads they are.
FYI says
Those pictures look like they should be part of a leftist,pc,multicult modern Anthropology exhibit.
“islam and its great contribution to life in Britain”
Sponsored by the Wahhabi foundation,the Salafists,the “nice” Sufis…
Rob says
+1!
T C says
Consider… ‘Groped by Holy Mosque guard during Hajj’ in Mecca
BBC VIDEO: A number of women have taken to social media to say they’ve been sexually assaulted during the Hajj pilgrimage…
http://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-middle-east-43174322/groped-by-holy-mosque-guard-during-hajj-in-mecca
Historian says
The original article is not clearly written–common problem in journalism where the desire for brevity ends up sacrificing clarity. It’s possible that it was only saying that this PARTICULAR report about PARTICULAR operation in this PARTICULAR area called New Castle found no evidence that police used phony “Islamophobia” or “racism” accusations as an excuse not to investigate or arrest. This New Castle operation was apparently recent, and after scandalous exposure of how so much sex trafficking in UK was ignored and even covered up for years because of the religion and perceived “race” of perps, the police in this operation may have been more careful about not committing the same sort of outrageous injustice against victims. The article does notice that all the perps came from a non-English “background” as well as being mostly British-born.
The statement in the article MAY not have been referring to ALL the sex trafficking perpetrated in UK over these many years. that was, as Spencer correctly reports, often covered up, ignored, but only this most recent investigation in the New Castle area. To be clear, the article should have said something like: unlike with earlier cases in the UK, there was no evidence that local police were afraid of ‘racism’ accusations during this particular operation….