Imam Qari Asim has had some thoughts on the occasion of “International Women’s Day”:
International Women’s Day is an incredibly important date, which should act as a reminder that we must live its values on every other day of the year. This year, more than ever, men have a responsibility to take part in the conversation, and have a responsibility to do what they can to further women’s rights. It is not women’s responsibility alone.
I am often asked about women’s role in Islam. The reality is that women are an integral part of both Islam and Britain alike. The Quran regards men and women as equals in the sight of God. It’s time, then, that we champion the success of Muslim women such as Malala Yousafzai, Mishal Husain and Nadiya Hussain, who are throwing [sic for ‘shining’] a positive spotlight on the contribution that Muslim women make to British society and who give young girls up and down the country and around the world someone to look up to.
Islam grants women, as it does men, fundamental rights to life, property, and opinion, and has done so for more than 14 centuries. However, it cannot be denied that despite this, they’ve had to fight for equality every step of the way. Men have sought control over their finances, opinions and fundamental rights to life, but “Time’s Up” on those controls; it’s time for a cultural shift.
Women are an “integral part of both Islam and Britain?” Well, yes, I suppose it is nice to have the obvious expressed, in the theatre of the absurd that is Islamic apologetics. But what’s this about the Qur’an regarding “men and women as equals”? If that is so, why does a daughter inherit half of what a son inherits? Why is a woman’s testimony worth only half that of a man? Why does a husband have the right to “beat” a disobedient wife, but a wife has no such right to “beat” her husband? Why does a Muslim man have a right to as many as four wives, while a Muslim woman can only have one husband? Why can a Muslim man divorce his wife merely by uttering the triple-talaq, while a wife must go through a complicated procedure, not always successful, to divorce her husband? Neither the Qur’an nor the Hadith treat women and men as “equals in the sight of God,” and Imam Qari Asim knows this perfectly well, but devoutly hopes you don’t and never will.
And what “fundamental rights to life, property, and opinion” is he talking about? Where is this “fundamental right to life” expressed anywhere in the Qur’an? Of course, Kuffars, men and women, have no such right: “kill the Infidel wherever you find him” the Qur’an commands in several places. But where is the verse — youth wants to know — that gives Muslim women, or men, the right to life? As to “property,” a woman does have a “fundamental right” in Islam to own and dispose of her own property (but must get her husband’s permission if she wishes to give more than one-third of what she possesses to charity). However, a woman” has no “right” to inherit equally with a man. As to the “fundamental right” of a woman to her opinion, there is no way to prevent her from having an opinion, but what counts is whether or not she has a right to express her opinion. And what good is having an opinion if you are forbidden from expressing it? In Islam, neither men nor women have a right to express an opinion that calls any part of Islam into question, or that is judged to be blasphemous. Free speech is not desirable, much less recognized as a right, in Islam.
I’ll never fully understand the fight that women experience daily. I do, however, recognise that fight and see suffering in society as well as in the Muslim community that I know needs to be stopped. From domestic violence to honour-based violence, being denied access to certain mosques, or having headscarves ripped off by an ignorant member of the public, it’s time for women to be treated equally and with dignity.
Notice how Imam Qari Asim does not explain that some forms of “domestic violence” can be justified in Islam: a “disobedient” wife can be beaten. Nor does he explain that the “honor-based violence” actually includes “honor-killings” or homicide, where a Muslim male kills a female in the family for “dishonoring” it and in some Muslim lands, goes either unpunished or receives an absurdly light punishment. Reasons that have been given to justify such murders include: refusing to enter an arranged marriage; being in a relationship that is disapproved by their family; having sex outside marriage; becoming the victim of rape; dressing in ways which are deemed inappropriate; engaging in non-heterosexual relations; renouncing a faith.
Sadly, we have seen some sickening instances in the news of some British Muslims and those of Pakistani heritage disproportionately involved in the localised grooming of vulnerable girls. Their actions are as horrifying as those exploiting my religion in their fight for Isis. None of these actions represent Islam, and they do not represent our communities or society. Any regressive demands – whether it be forced marriage, honour killing or social and economic exclusion – voiced in the name of Islam must not be tolerated.
As to grooming gangs, look at how he puts it: Pakistanis are “disproportionately involved.” No, not disproportionately — it is only Pakistanis (or as he delicately puts it, “those of Pakistani heritage”) who have been involved. Then he describes “localized” grooming; the adjective is meant to dishonestly suggest that the grooming goes on in only in a few places, but the grooming gangs are known to have operated all over England, and some claim that it may have involved possibly as many as one million victims. Rotherham, with at least 1400 victims, is the one we have heard about the most, but it is not an isolated example.
Then there is the exculpation of Islam: the grooming gangs are just like members of ISIS, for both “[exploit] my religion.” He adds, just to drive the absurd point home, that “none of these actions represent Islam.” But they do, for in Islam, Infidel women are fair game for Muslim men; they can be treated as “those slaves whom the right hand possesses.” The Pakistani predators allowed themselves to believe that their actions, victimizing only Infidel women, were justified in Islam.
I refuse to stand by and remain silent while extremist narratives dictate that Islam oppresses women. White supremacist groups like the English Defence League only fuel Islamophobia by claiming that the actions of a few represent the whole of Islam. Sexual offenders bring nothing but shame on their religion, their families and communities. We need to be robust in always calling out who the criminal is, whether it be a far-right individual or a member of the Muslim community, and work to protect and stand up for women.
It’s not “extremist narratives” — from Islamophobes — that “dictate that Islam oppresses women.” It’s the Qur’an, that declares a woman’s testimony worth half that of a man; that a woman can only inherit half the property that a male relative inherits; that permits polygamy and triple-talaq divorce for the man. The Qur’an tells Believers that “Men are managers of the affairs of women because Allah has made the one superior to the other.” It is in a hadith of Bukhari (6:301) that we learn the reason why a woman’s testimony is worth half that of a man: “[Muhammad] said, ‘Is not the evidence of two women equal to the witness of one man?’” They replied in the affirmative. He said, “This is the deficiency in her intelligence.”
More nonsense, and more false equivalence. The English Defense League is not a “white supremacist group,” no matter how often it is described as such; its main mission is to warn about the stealth jihad, and especially the demographic danger Muslims pose in the U.K. The imam says that “we must be robust in calling out who the criminal is, whether it be a far-right individual or a member of the Muslim community.” How many acts of industrial-strength criminality, akin to the mass rapes in many parts of Britain by members of the grooming gangs, with possibly a million victims, have “far-right individuals” taken part in? Five? One? None?
Focusing on someone’s race or religion when calling them out for doing something illegal detracts from the real issue. The real issue is exploitation of vulnerable people.
But the “real issue” of the grooming gangs of England is not the “exploitation of vulnerable people.” That’s far too bland and misleading a description. In the first place, there is the sheer scope of the crimes of these gangs. In the town of Rotherham, at least 1400 girls were made victims of grooming gangs of Pakistanis. And it bears repeating: all over Great Britain, it has been estimated that a million girls may have been victims. This is not just the “exploitation of vulnerable people”; the word “exploitation” does not do justice to the immensity of the crimes. It was the sheer horror of those crimes that caused people to at first disbelieve the reports. Policy analyst George Igler has noted that “when you encounter an issue that is just so unbelievable, just so outside your frame of reference and understanding, the immediate human reaction is just one to not believe it at all.” The grooming went like this: A girl would be picked up, sometimes outside her children’s home (if she was a ward of the state) or at school (if she hadn’t yet dropped out of school) by so-called “romeos” — young Muslim men well-versed in the arts of the pick-up and of sweet-talk. They would make the girls feel important; they were given gifts and drugs. They were being groomed to be drug-addicted sex slaves. Then came the gang rapes. They were threatened with death if they tried to flee.
And George Igler said that “the thing you have to understand about this rape of children is it’s not just sexual abuse. It is unspeakable levels of violence, victims being raped with knives, victims being raped with bottles, victims having their tongues nailed to tables. These are sometimes girls who are picked up from a children’s home on a Friday, are being raped during the course of a weekend by hundreds of men and returned with bleeding groins back to the children’s’ home on a Monday morning and they [the authorities] don’t do anything about it at all.”…None of this is adequately conveyed by the imam’s phrase about the “exploitation of vulnerable people.”
The systematic, depraved, monstrously cruel exploitation of underage girls for sex by Muslim men continued for years in Rotherham — and elsewhere in England — without being stopped. The Pakistanis would pass the girls around among themselves, as if they were party favors, or make them available, in some cases, for mass rape by hundreds of fellow Pakistanis over a weekend.
The imam tells us it is wrong to focus “on someone’s race or religion” just because he “has done something illegal,” for he claims that only “detracts” [for “distracts”] from what the writer calls the “real issue.”
But the “real issue” here has everything to do with race and religion. All of the young girls who were sexually brutalized were white, English, and non-Muslim. All of their victimizers, the ones who, sometimes by the dozen, sometimes by the hundreds, would rape their victims, and just for fun, rape them too, with knives, with bottles, and torture them, even nailing their tongues to tables — that’ll teach them not to talk! — were Pakistani Muslims. Those men had been brought up in a culture where they were taught that non-Muslims were the “most vile of creatures” and that Infidel women were especially to be despised for the supposed looseness of their dress and morals. You could do with them what you wished. The rape gangs operated according to Islamic principles. As Robert Spencer has pointed out, “the Qur’an teaches that Infidel women can be lawfully taken for sexual use (cf. its allowance for a man to take ‘captives of the right hand,’ 4:3, 4:24, 23:1-6, 33:50, 70:30).” There are no reports of any Muslim girls being the victims of Muslim grooming gangs; that, of course, wouldn’t be right.
The message I have to [sic] the men in my congregation on International Women’s Day will be to start by thanking the women in your life for the sacrifices they have made – big or small – and take time to recognise what it must be like to be a woman around the world. Women in our communities, whether at work or in a mosque, must be valued and welcomed. British Muslim women are increasingly confronting inequalities and discrimination. A woman’s strength should be celebrated and supported – not abused or silenced.
If British Muslim women are “increasingly” confronting — that is, challenging — inequalities and discrimination, it is because they live in a non-Muslim society where the law does not sanction the “inequalities and discrimination” upheld by Islam. When they first arrive in Great Britain, isolated from the broader British society, living in a Muslim ghetto, Muslim women may not realize quite how different their lot is under British law. Gradually, as they come to understand that law, they are fortified, and readier to challenge their inferior status under Islam. They eventually realize that they do not inherit only half what male relatives do; that their testimony at law is equal to that of a man; that they cannot be divorced by a husband who merely utters the triple-talaq; that they cannot legally be “beaten” even if they are deemed “disobedient,” as can happen in Muslim countries where Qur’an 4:34 is observed. Since polygamy is not allowed in Great Britain, they need not endure the humiliations of being one wife among several. They take their strength from living in the land of the Kuffar, where women by both law and custom are equal to men. They are thus ready to take on the “inequalities and discrimination” that Muslim men still attempt to observe, even living in Great Britain.
Or could our writer the imam possibly mean his readers to understand that the “inequalities and discrimination” to which he refers are those which British Muslim women supposedly endure from the “islamophobic” Kuffar? Just on the off chance that he did, I looked high and low, but could not find online a single instance where a Muslim woman has endured “inequalities and discrimination” at the hands of non-Muslims in Great Britain. What I have found, instead, is a widespread and hypertrophied fear among Infidels of being considered “islamophobic,” or guilty of anti-Muslim “racism,” and they have bent over backwards in Britain to show that they treat Muslims as equals or, if they discriminate, it is in their favor. The authorities, in schools and children’s homes, who did not report the grooming gangs, the police who for so long did not investigate those gangs, were determined not to be called “racists” or “islamophobes,” and so they allowed gangs, made up entirely of Muslim men, to victimize girls. all of whom were white, English, and non-Muslim. For those very reasons, in the eyes of their Muslim tormentors, they deserved the horrific treatment they received. But that, I’m afraid, is not something that imam Qari Asim is in any mood to discuss, not even on International Women’s Day.
mortimer says
Imam Qari Asim is painting a happy face on a monster … Islamic misogyny.
It doesn’t fool anyone. The reality is that women are slaves and the absolute property of men in Islam for time and eternity.
Benedict says
“The reality is that women are an integral part of both Islam and Britain alike. The Quran regards men and women as equals in the sight of God” –
What the Imam celebrates is not the equality of women and men in Islam. He celebrates that Islam is now an integral part of Britain and the prospect that Britain will be an integral part of Islam and the Ummah in a foreseeable future. –
“Islam grants ..” –
A country that lets Islam grant its people anything whatsoever is doomed for spiritual darkness and destruction.
gravenimage says
True, Benedict–and Islam plans on treating the British the same way it treats women.
Westman says
Imam Qari Asim’s statement about Women’s day seemed to contradict the Quran’s half-value of women:
“International Women’s Day is an incredibly important date, which should act as a reminder that we must live its values on every other day of the year.”
The contradiction was resolved upon realizing that the grooming gangs can take the odd days and “good” Muslims can take the even days; retaining the Quranic half value of women’s testimony, inheritance, and intelligence.
London’s Mayor Khan, currently playing Stalin with the social media, should be quick to pick up this Imam’s conflation of Muslim grooming gangs with non-existant nativist grooming gangs.
One is inclined to feel sorry for good people who are Muslims, by accident of birth, who cannot escape the free world’s reaction to the ugliness of the Quran that hangs about their necks as a millstone.
gravenimage says
I think he just means that Islam needs women to breed more Jihadists. He just hopes the filthy Infidels don’t get that.
LeftisruiningCanada says
“Their actions are as horrifying as those exploiting my religion in their fight for Isis. None of these actions represent Islam, and they do not represent our communities or society”
The fact is that the sex slave gangs definitely represent mohammad and the degenerate culture of Pakistan that he helped create.
The texts of islam and the life of mohammad are very easily ‘exploited’ by those who want to own little non-muslim girls to be their abused and destroyed play things, since mohammad gave his example and word to follow.
I can’t decide whether these imam are simply lying to us, are willfully ignoring the many bad parts of mohammad’s life, or are so arrogant in their position as a teacher of islam that they truly believe that their version of islam is the only way it can possibly be.
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
Hugh Fitzgerald, what it meant women are equal with m’en before Allah is that he who is righteous, whether male or female, Will be given his reward and be the best in the sight of Allah. when It comes to social responsibility, each is assigned with a position and responsibility befiting to him. Husband is always thé head of the family and is responsable to take of his wife and children
.Allah said husband shall associate with his wife with love, mercy and kindness(Aashiruhunna bil maaruf). He should not be harsh to his wife. The wife shall respect the husband and show him love. she should not be rude that could weaken the love between them. That is why the Quran stated that he shall admonish her to be of good behavior. when she refuses to amend he should report the matter to her family to call her to order. If she refuses to amend he could resort to boycotting her in love. if she persist he could resort to symbolic beating which Will not injure her just to call her to order. But prophet muhammad advised Muslims to exercise restrain to avoid such resort to symbolic beating. In fact It a sîgn of a person to be considered as a good muslim for him not resort to beating his wife . Thé holy prophet muhammad said “yamlakuhunna la’im(it is only a rascal person Will be dictatorial ànd mistreats his wife)”.it means the husband runs the family in consultation with his wife. prophet muhammad used to consult his wives on running the affairs of the family and urged his followers to do the same . In fact all his wives described him as the best husband who never mistreated any one of them.
LeftisruiningCanada says
By “consult” you of course mean “knocked them around”.
Buraq says
@ Ibrahim itace Muhamed
You have some explaining to do, habibi! Sahih Muslim book 004, Hadith number 2127 clearly narrates the following:
. …… he (the Holy Prophet) entered the (house), and said: Why is it, O ‘Aisha, that you are out of breath? I said: There is nothing. He said: Tell me or the Subtle and the Aware would inform me. I said: Messenger of Allah, may my father and mother be ransom for you, and then I told him (the whole story). He said: Was it the darkness (of your shadow) that I saw in front of me? I said: Yes. He struck me on the chest which caused me pain, and then said: Did you think that Allah and His Apostle would deal unjustly with you?
So, Muhamed struck his child bride on the chest and caused her pain! Get outta that one, Houdini!
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
Buraq, It was not hostile or violent strike,he just hit her chest to draw her attention. you can do such things even to your friend. Did Aisha complain that the prophet used violence on her ? Read the context carefully.
LeftisruiningCanada says
Yeah, right. It was a non violent and friendly painful punch to the chest of a teenage girl by a 50+ y/o warlord, come prophet of god.
What’s the big deal?
Jack Diamond says
Aisha: “Do you make us (women) equal to dogs and donkeys?” Bukhari, 1: 9: 486
The answer is yes. The is how much Islam raised the status of women.
You have [the right] that they should not cause any one of whom you dislike to tread on your beds; and that they should not commit any open indecency (fāḥishah). If they do, then God permits you to shut them in separate rooms and to beat them, but not severely. If they abstain from [evil], they have the right to their food and clothing in accordance with custom (bi’l-ma‘rūf). Treat women well, for they are [like] domestic animals (‘awānin)” –Tabari, The Last Sermon
“(as to) those on whose part you fear desertion, admonish them, and leave them alone in the sleeping-places and beat them; then if they obey you, do not seek a way against them; surely Allah is High.” s.4:34
{She doesn’t have to even disobey him, he has only to fear she will disobey him or that she is even thinking of disobeying him and he may beat her. Are there any consequences for a husband beating his wife? Will he have to answer for beating her?} “No! Umar narrated, “The Prophet said, ‘A man will not be asked as to why he beat his wife.’” Dawud 11:2142
Aisha narrated, “He (Muhammad) struck me on the chest which caused me pain”
Sahih Muslim: 4: 2127
Caused her pain, not “drew her attention.”
Narrated Aisha:Abu Bakr came to towards me and struck me violently with his fist and said, “You have detained the people because of your necklace.” But I remained motionless as if I was dead lest I should awake Allah’s Apostle although that hit was very painful.
Sahih Bukhari 8:82:828
That hit was very painful, not a love tap that “drew her attention”
“As for Ali he said “Women are plentiful, and you can easily change one for another. Ask the slave girl; she will tell you the truth.” So the Apostle called Burayra to ask her and Ali got up and gave her a violent beating, saying, ‘Tell the Apostle the truth.’”
Ibn Ishaq: p 496
When a woman who was beaten severely by her husband went to Muhammad to complain he reproached her and ignored her request.
“Narrated Ikrima: ‘Rifaa divorced his wife whereupon Abdur-Rahman married her. Aisha said that the lady came wearing a green veil and complained to her (Aisha) and showed her a green spot on her skin caused by beating. It was the habit of ladies to support each other, so when Allah’s messenger came, Aisha said, “I have not seen any woman suffering as much as the believing women. Look! Her skin is greener than her clothes!”
–Bukhari 7:6:715
{beaten so hard her skin turned green, not love taps to draw her attention}
“Discipline. The husband has the right to discipline his wife if she disobeys him in something good, not if she disobeys him in something sinful, because Allaah has enjoined disciplining women by forsaking them in bed and by hitting them, when they do not obey. The Hanafis mentioned four situations in which a husband is permitted to discipline his wife by hitting her. These are: not adorning herself when he wants her to; not responding when he calls her to bed and she is taahirah (pure, i.e., not menstruating); not praying; and going out of the house without his permission.”
‘What are the rights of the husband and what are the rights of the wife?’
Sheikh Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid, Islam Q&A, Fatwa No. 10680
Muhammad’s high opinion of women:
“After me I have not left any affliction more harmful to men than women.” {Bukhari}
He said, “I also saw the Hell-fire and I had never seen such a horrible sight. I saw that most of the inhabitants were women.” The people asked, “O Allah’s Apostle! Why is it so?” The Prophet replied, “Because of their ungratefulness.” It was asked whether they are ungrateful to Allah. The Prophet said, “They are ungrateful to their husbands”…
{No mention of men suffering any consequences for mistreating their wives}
3 quick examples of the consequences, in dar al-Islam:
in Afghanistan:
Nearly 90 percent of Afghan women suffer from domestic abuse, according to the United Nations Development Fund for Women.
in Iran,
Statistics in Iran show that 66% of Iranian women, at the beginning of the marriage have been at least physically abused once. Some forms of physical abuse that occur include: biting, bondage, imprisonment in their own home, scratching, hair pulling, and even starving.
London-based Refugee Workers Association Woman’s Group (GIK-DER) revealed disturbing news last week [in November, 2006] that up to 80% Turkish and Kurdish women are victims of domestic violence and sexual harassment. At the same time 70% of Turkish and Kurdish husbands cheat on their wives.
According to a government study titled “Research on Domestic Violence against Women in Turkey,” 41.9 percent of Turkish women are subjected to physical and sexual violence. Women at a “low-income level” are assaulted at a rate of 49.9 percent, while the number for higher-income women is still high, at 28.7 percent.
Altogether, 33.7 percent of women said they considered suicide as a solution to their problems.
{WikiIslam “Wife Beating in Islam”}
gravenimage says
Ah…right. When I want to get my loved one’s attention, I always strike them in the chest and “cause them pain”. sarc/off
Just grotesque whitewash of abuse from the appalling Ibrahim itace muhammed.
Eur says
Mohammed said”ajamalajid a Jamalajad, yaiuaribiya lulukunah”…. ahhhaahahhaahaa blablablablabla
LeftisruiningCanada says
ahhhh durkadurkadurka.
gravenimage says
Ibrahim itace muhammed wrote:
Hugh Fitzgerald, what it meant women are equal with m’en before Allah is that he who is righteous, whether male or female, Will be given his reward and be the best in the sight of Allah. when It comes to social responsibility, each is assigned with a position and responsibility befiting to him. Husband is always thé head of the family and is responsable to take of his wife and children
…………………..
What he means is that Muslims have the right to beat the crap out of their wives and children. *Ugh*.
Buraq says
Imam Qari Asim is one of the ‘go to’ op-edders who write for “The Independent”. However, his capacity for self-delusion is breath taking. In his op-ed piece of 20th August, 2017 entitled ‘This is why young, Europeans are joining Isis’ he writes :
‘A profiling of these terrorists reveals that there are several factors that can turn a young person into a terrorist, and some of these factors are not exclusive to Muslims because *Isis recruits are not Muslims only.*’ (!)
So, according to this clown, there are young guys paying their way to the front line to die in the way of Allah who are not Muslim!
So, you can be sure that anything else this clown writes is probably riddled with nonsense!
Marina says
Imam Qari didn’t mention FGM.
Islamic mirror says
• There are no excuses allowed for any reason: “By him in Whose Hand lies my life, a woman cannot carry out the right of her Lord, till she carries out the right of her husband. And if he asks her to surrender herself [to him for sexual intercourse] she should not refuse him even if she is on a camel’s saddle.” — Ibn Majah 1854
(“This sentence sends out a message to people who think they are outside the law with behaviour which cannot be excused)
• Man’s sexual needs are considered so urgent that it is better for food to burn in the oven than a man to burn in waiting for his wife to satisfy his desire. If she refuses, the angels of heaven will turn against her.
• “The prophet of Allah said: When a man calls his wife to satisfy his desire, let her come to him though she is occupied at the oven/riding on camel.”[38] . Women cannot enter heaven without man
• Hadith, Sahih Bukhari, Volume 4, Book 54, Number 460:
Narrated Abu Huraira:
Allah’s Apostle said, “If a husband calls his wife to his bed (i.e. to have sexual relation) and she refuses and causes him to sleep in anger, the angels will curse her till morning.”
• hadith depicts Muhammad saying: “If a husband calls his wife to his bed [i.e. to have sexual relation] and she refuses and causes him to sleep in anger, the angels will curse her till morning” (Bukhari 4.54.460).
• Al-Tirmidhi 3272 – “When Allah’s Messenger was asked which woman was best he replied, ‘The one who pleases (her husband) when he looks at her, obeys him when he gives a command, and does not go against his wishes regarding her person or property by doing anything of which he disapproves’.” (See also Abu Dawud 1664)
• [It is not fitting for a Believer, man or woman, when a matter has been decided by Allah and His Messenger to have any option about their decision…”
Koran 33:36,
part of Islamic law
P.S. Denying any verse in the Koran is punished by death. This can be carried out, vigilante-style, by anyone: there is no penalty “since it is killing someone who deserves to die” (Manual of Islamic Law, “Reliance of the Traveller” o8.4).
• they try to call this a religion:-‘She must make herself available to her husband whenever he says ”I’m ready, I need you.”Could it be any clearer that islam is nothing more than the sick, perverted wish-list of a sick, perverted man]?
Sahih Bukhari (62:81) – “The Prophet said: “‘The stipulations most entitled to be abided by are those with which you are given the right to enjoy the (women’s) private parts (i.e. the stipulations of the marriage contract).’” In other words, the most important thing a woman brings to marriage is between her legs
The majority of the inhabitants of hell are women:
Hadith depicts Muhammad saying that the majority of the inhabitants of hell are women: “I looked into Paradise and I saw that the majority of its people were the poor. And I looked into Hell and I saw that the majority of its people are women.” Sahih Bukhari 3241; Sahih Muslim 2737)
what disgusting deception this is; it provides no hope. that’s as the allah god of islam (unknowable; the best of all deceivers) would have it – even according to the companions. the allah god cannot provide hope. impotent and weak it is.
however: HEAVEN –
• When asked about this, he explained: “I was shown Hell and I have never seen anything more terrifying than it. And I saw that the majority of its people are women.” They said, “Why, O Messenger of Allah?” He said, “Because of their ingratitude (kufr).” It was said, “Are they ungrateful to Allah?” He said, “They are ungrateful to their companions (husbands) and ungrateful for good treatment. If you are kind to one of them for a lifetime then she sees one (undesirable) thing in you, she will say, ‘I have never had anything good from you.’” (Sahih Bukhari 1052)
• Sahih Bukhari (2:28) & Sahih Bukhari (54:464) – Women comprise the majority of Hell’s occupants. This is important because the only women in heaven mentioned explicitly by Muhammad are the virgins who serve the sexual desires of men. (A weak Hadith, Kanz al-`ummal, 22:10, even suggests that 99% of women go to Hell).
• Muhammad despised you so much that he did not invite you to Paradise. Read Suras 44, 55 & 56 and see for yourselves that the only females in Paradise are the Hur, sex toys of “special creation”, who await there for the gratification of your husbands…who will be so busy enjoying their carnal attentions that they will have no further need for you. You, therefore, are surplus to requirements; you, therefore, are not invited to the party. With all my heart I ask you -READ YOUR QURAN, AND BE SHOCKED.
25 percent women will enter heaven and 75 percent into hell.
Mohammed, , said:”heaven is built from bricks of gold and bricks of silver placed alternately…”
In an authentic Hadeeth, the Prophet, , said to women: “I have seen you constituting the majority of the dwellers of Hell …”In another Hadeeth, the Prophet, , said: “The least in number among the dwellers of Paradise are women.”[Al-Bukhari and Muslim]
However, it was narrated in another authentic Hadeeth that each man of this world will have two wives from this world in Paradise plus 72 virgins
Women who enter Paradise will be restored their youth and virginity, as the Prophet, , said: “…Old women will not enter Paradise… when Allah The Almighty admits them to Paradise, He will make them virgins.”
Saudi Sheikh Yahya Al-Jana’ explains the precise ‘pleasures’ of a man who has the merit to enter the ‘Paradise’ of the next world. Note: Most women don’t make it there.
Saudi Sheikh Yahya Al-Jana’ waxes lyrical about the joy virgins
There are not many women in paradise. It is mostly men who enter paradise. (Prophet Mohammed) said that some women would not even smell paradise. although it can be smelled from a distance that would take 500 years to cross. Why? They are unveiled playing, up charms. Wearing tight clothes in shopping malls putting on perfumes and jewllary, talking to young men , sending her pictures via filthy social media platforms.
• Allah described (the virgins of paradise) very specifically. He even described their breasts: indeed for the pious there is place for triumph. Gardens and grape yards, full -breasted women of equal age.” “Full-breasted women of equal age” refer to the virgin of paradise.Allah described their breasts in order to let you know what awaits for you in paradise. There is no shame talking about these things. (Allah) wants make you vie for (paradise).
Mohammed said, “by Allah, a man have a hundred virgins in a single morning.” And what it is more amazing is that each time he returns one of them, he will find that she is virgin again and that she is even more lustful and feminine.
• ‘Most of Those Who Enter the Gates of Hell Are Women’
At a Friday sermon at the al-Salam mosque in Giza, Egypt, an imam explains to men where women will end up and how ‘in paradise,’ a man ‘will be given the strength of a 100 men when it comes to lust, pleasure, eating, drinking and sexual intercourse.’
• ‘The lady who plucks her eyebrows and the one who gets them plucked, they’re both cursed by Allah.’
• And in another hadith: “The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) went out to the musalla (prayer place) on the day of Eid al-Adha or Eid al-Fitr. He passed by the women and said, ‘O women! Give charity, for I have seen that you form the majority of the people of Hell.’ They asked, ‘Why is that, O Messenger of Allah?’ He replied, ‘You curse frequently and are ungrateful to your husbands. I have not seen anyone more deficient in intelligence and religious commitment than you. A cautious sensible man could be led astray by some of you.’ The women asked, ‘O Messenger of Allah, what is deficient in our intelligence and religious commitment?’ He said, ‘Is not the testimony of two women equal to the testimony of one man?’ They said, ‘Yes.’ He said, ‘This is the deficiency in her intelligence. Is it not true that a woman can neither pray nor fast during her menses?’ The women said, ‘Yes.’ He said, ‘This is the deficiency in her religious commitment.’” (Sahih Bukhari 304)
Everything in islam appears to be geared towards satisfying the male.
Islamic mirror says
As for Surah 68:42, this is talking about MAN not Allah SWT being bare, MEN and WOMEN will be bare and in the most vulnerable state they have ever been. It was even said that Men and women will be naked together but they will be so concerned about their judgment that will be the only thing on their minds.
This is pathetic, the day of judgment will be different than the life on earth, your hands, eyes, tongued, etc. will testify against you. Every sinful person will see other sinful people’s misdeeds and conducts of their worldly life. On that day our veil from our eyes will be lifted and the truth of every mystery will be clear. So, why would it be problematic that on that day Allah SWT (GOD) will reveal him self and Man will finally be able to conceive to glory of GOD?
Islamic mirror says
People are not brain dead , They can read and understand ,will not accept 7th century interpretation by Islamic apologists.
Mohammed goes to bed with Ayesha, waits for her to fall asleep, leaves and goes to a public area. She follows him, watches him stand around for a long time and then raise his hand to the sky 3 times (again with the number 3 obsession), and then she runs back and jumps into bed. He comes home, finds her out of breath, reveals that he’d known all along that she was following him, and then he punches her in the chest.
Mohammed, man of God, punches his adolescent wife on the chest.
Mohammed himself once deliberately struck ‘Aisha “on the chest which caused me pain”, according to Sahih Muslim vol.2 book 4 ch.352 no.2127 p.462.
-Muhammad’s molestation of baby Aisha
Muhammad would He practice Mahr-Khathat (thighing), from age 6 to age 8.thigh( also known as “child molestation” in the West) with baby Aisha
gravenimage says
Good posts, Islamic Mirror.
Karen says
Qari Asim says: “International Women’s Day is an incredibly important date, which should act as a reminder that we must live its values on every other day of the year.”
Would that be Monday-Wednesday-Friday?
gravenimage says
Hugh Fitzgerald: An Imam Celebrates — Sort Of — Women
………………
Not really. This is just more Taqiyya to snow the ever-hopeful “filthy Infidels”.
MFritz says
He’s not stupid. Islam NEEDS women. Without them their society collapses. So he does a bit of pandering, doesn’t go into inconvenient details (fgm etc.) and claims to be a “understanding”.