Ali Muhammad Brown described himself as a “strict Muslim.” He “told investigators that his four male victims represented ‘a life for a life’ for ‘Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, all these places where innocent lives are being taken every single day.’”
This endless cycle of revenge is sanctioned by the Qur’an: “And We ordained for them therein a life for a life, an eye for an eye, a nose for a nose, an ear for an ear, a tooth for a tooth, and for wounds is legal retribution. But whoever gives charity, it is an expiation for him. And whoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed – then it is those who are the wrongdoers.” (5:45)
Read here an exclusive firsthand account from someone who knew Ali Muhammad Brown.
“Seattle man accused of terrorism pleads guilty to NJ murder,” by David Porter, Associated Press, March 6, 2018:
NEWARK, N.J. —A man who authorities say killed four people in two states in revenge for U.S. policy in the Middle East has pleaded guilty to killing a college student in New Jersey.
The Essex County prosecutor’s office said Tuesday that Ali Muhammad Brown admitted shooting 19-year-old Brandon Tevlin in late June 2014 as Tevlin sat at a traffic light in West Orange, a few miles from Newark.
Brown, a 33-year-old former Seattle resident, pleaded guilty to multiple charges, including murder, murder, robbery and terrorism. He was the first person charged with terrorism connected to a homicide under a New Jersey law.
Brown also is awaiting trial in three killings in Washington state from earlier in 2014.
In court papers filed in Seattle, authorities said Brown described himself to detectives after his New Jersey arrest as a strict Muslim who had become angry with the U.S. government’s role in Iraq, Iran and Afghanistan. He claimed the government’s actions led to the deaths of innocent civilians and children.
In a subsequent recorded interview in New Jersey, Washington authorities wrote, Brown described his idea of a “just kill,” in which the target was men unaccompanied by women, children or elderly people….
mariam rove says
Killing innocent people who had nothing to do with anything is the hallmark of coward muslims. period. M
mortimer says
No, MR, “retribution in blood is COMPULSORY” in Islam.
-K.11.173 “Believers, retaliation is decreed for you in bloodshed.”
-K.2.178 “O you who believe! Retaliation is prescribed for you in the matter of the slain.”
– K.5:33 “The reprisal against those who wage war on Allah and His Messenger, and go about the earth corrupting it, is that they should be killed or crucified, or have their alternate hands and feet cut off, or be banished from the land.” Waging war against Allah is rejecting Him.”–Tafsir of Imam al-Bukhari
J D S says
Islam can not be shown in a favorable light no matter who or what tries to do so…….neither Muslims or non Muslims can find any way to prove Islam to be a Jesus based religion.
Muhammad , if he ever existed, copied from the old and new Testament, or someone did. He was illiterate, and not really understanding what was read to him, came up with a mish mash of gobbledygook that came to be called the Koran. And after people didn’t flock to his made up unfounded religion he started FORCING people to join and then held them there by FESR , which holds true to this very day……and that can not be disputed…Quoting Quaradwi, most renowned of Muslim clerics…”if they had gotten rid of the apostasy law, Islam wouldn’t exist today” need I say more.
Emilie Green says
Is a “strict Muslim” more dangerous than a “devout Muslim?”
mortimer says
Emilie, you know the answer. Our dumb politicians DON’T know or PRETEND not to know.
SweetOlBob says
Emilie:
Was this guy a convert to islam or was he a supposed refugee ?
All muslims coming from theocratic, islamic countries are inbred to a degree. Somewhere, back in their history, there is a first cousin, or an aunt, or even a sister bred into the bloodline who produces children.
The resulting gene pool damage, if it doesn’t produce idiocy or truly deformed children, lurks in the background until it bursts forth, shouting “Aloha Snackbar” ! Then it either kills or cripples a totally innocent by-stander who is not a filthy muslim.
If they don’t act out their religious commanded performance, the inbreds act as “holy” men and specialize in radicalizing any infidel who is stupid enough to join them.
just asking and just saying.
Ray Jarman says
It is time that this member of the cult of the pernicious murdering thug be executed. I would gladly pull the lever for ten thousand volts and ten amps into him but very slowly to let him know that he is dying and is in horrific pain. These devils belong in the 8th Circle of Hell in Dante Alighieri’s “Divine Comedy.”
mortimer says
Ray, we have to take the Koran to court and try it as HATE LITERATURE in countries where such laws exist.
WorkingClassPost says
Yes.
Remember Anders Brevik. His ‘manifesto’ was read in court and is still used to try and wrongly implicate anyone mentioned in it, even Robert Spencer, who Breivik was actually critical of.
So why don’t they take a self confessed ‘strict muslim’ practitioner’s motivating manifesto into account?
Silly question, I know, but still worth asking from time to time.
J D S says
YES Mortimer..it WILL take laws to take Islam out…we have religious freedoms…but no religion that is recognized has the sword verses. murder, rape , slavery .thievery, lying and on and on, as it’s core…..so there is precedent for passing laws to make Islam, for the most part. Illegal…but whose to take up the gauntlet? Therein lies the problem.
No Muzzies Here says
Anger, hatred and ugliness is evident on his face.
mortimer says
NMH, he is IMITATING Mohammed as well as Mohammed’s facial expressions. Mohammed laughed only after people were killed.
mortimer says
DO WESTERN LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS and INTELLIGENCE UNDERSTAND ISLAMIC “RETRIBUTION” ???
Retribution is a COMPULSORY Islamic teaching! Even though Muslims live in the West benefiting from the blessings of freedom, the rule of law and prosperity, they still bring the Honor-Shame Paradigm with them. Honor is restored to a Muslim through the shedding of blood. No kafir is ‘innocent’. All kafirs deserve to be killed only because they reject Mohammed. The citizens of an entire kafir country can be held responsible because they taxes to support their military which attacks jihadists overseas. Islam thus considers all civilians legitimate targets for revenge in settling a matter of Islamic honor.
Jack Diamond says
Collective responsibility and collective punishment are the Islamic m.o. We are all kaffirs. We are all Crusaders, what have you.
This is practiced regularly in Pakistan where fake rumors of a desecrated Qur’an are enough to raise a mob up into a fury to rampage and pillage entire Christian communities. In Egypt, if one Copt upsets the Muslims, all Christians are fair game. In 2012 a mob of 3,000 Muslims attacked Christians because a Muslim accused a Christian of having an “intimate photo” of a Muslim woman on his phone. Such anecdotes are endless.
Any excuse will do, when the Danish cartoons were published (embellished by imams with worse cartoons to further incite violence), Muslims in Nigeria (Maiduguri) went on a rampage burning Christian shops and churches and killing Christians; a Catholic priest was murdered in Turkey by a Muslim teenager; a Danish lawyer was shot and killed in Moscow by a Muslim. Over the Danish cartoons.
This was also the way of life under dhimmitude. The Moroccan jurist al-Maghili wrote: “the fact that one individual (or one group) among them has broken the statute is enough to invalidate it for all of them.” Mark Durie writes, “even a breach by a single individual dhimmi could result in jihad against the whole community.”
The infamous fatwa cited by ISIS, issued by Saudi Sheikh Nasr Al-Fahd, sanctioned the murder of (at least) 10 million Americans in the name of paying evil for evil, life for life, with no regard for either the innocent, for Muslim aggressions, or for math.
‘Because Allah Almighty says “to punish in similar fashion as you were afflicted”, and the Almighty says “Attack who attacks you in similar ways as you were attacked,” and the Almighty says “Pay evil with evil,” so the observer sees American aggression on Muslims and their lands during the past decades concludes the permission to use aggression with reciprocity only as has been collected by some of the brothers the number of dead from amongst the Muslims with their weapons of direct and indirect, methods to bring the number close to ten million. And as for the lands that [America] burned with their bombs and their explosives and rockets not one can enumerate except Allah, and whatever else happened in Afghanistan and Iraq, and this is what caused the wars on many of the Muslims causing homelessness. So if bomb is launched at them that will kill ten million of them, and it will burn their land as much as they burned the Muslim lands this is therefore permissible without the need to mention any other evidence.’
Exhibit A. Ali Muhammad Brown. Strict Muslim.
“There are no moderate Muslims. There are also no radical Muslims. All Muslims believe in the same book, every word of it. They just practice it to different extents. We call those who follow their faith to the letter radical and the wish-washy ones moderate. There is only one Islam: The Islam of Muhammad and the Quran. It is the only Islam that matters. The rest is a bunch of lies. This Islam is violent. It instructs the believer to lie to the unbelievers, to cast terror in their hearts and to murder them.”
–Ali Sina
Islam is violent. It instructs the believer to lie to the unbelievers, to cast terror in their hearts and to murder them.
mortimer says
Exactly, JD, they all sing from the SAME ‘hymnbook’. They all have the same Sira, Koran and hadiths.
Those texts MAY NOT BE CHANGED, EDITED or IMPROVED. They must be accepted as LITERALLY TRUE.
The only difference among Muslims is the DEGREE of enforcement of Allah ETERNAL DECREES to rape, decapitate, chop, mutilate, throw off roves, stone, or crucify.
Some moderate Muslims only allow MODERATE CRUCIFIXIONS.
gravenimage says
Fine exchange, Mortimer and Jack. Important points.
J D S says
Every zONe poster needs to write call email or sit on the footsteps of our elected officials and make them understand that it will take the passage of laws to take out Islam or at least the more bad in it….as I stated in another post our religious freedom law pertains to civil religions and Islam sure isn’t civil. Of course with the way Washington is treating Islam it probably won’t do any good to talk to our officials but if we don’t try then it’s our problem.
LeftisruiningCanada says
“Brown described his idea of a “just kill,” in which the target was men unaccompanied by women, children or elderly people”
So long as the lone victim was unarmed and didn’t know the attacker was coming.
Far from a ‘just kill’, it sounds like the idea was to just kill.
CogitoErgoSum says
It is now clear to me that the United States is part of Dar al-Harb and the non-Muslims living here are kafir harbis in the eyes of Muslims. Per Islamic doctrine any Muslim may kill a kafir harbi with no obligatory indemnity whatsoever until the land controlled by the kafir harbis has been made a part of the land of the Muslims (Dar al-Islam). The very fact that a person is a Muslim makes that person my enemy (per THEIR rules and not mine). Every Muslim who is allowed onto U.S. territory is an enemy of the United States. It’s time to face up to this and to understand the consequences of Muslim immigration. The laws of our land are protecting us now but as the numbers of the Muslims increase in a country, the safety of the non-Muslims in that country will inevitably decrease.
The fact that most Muslims living in the United States today do not follow this doctrine concerning kafir harbis is no guarantee that the Muslims in the future will do the same. It’s a matter of time and numbers. The doctrine is out there and it will be out there waiting to be implemented sometime in the future ….. when the numbers add up.
gravenimage says
“Strict Muslim” pleads guilty to New Jersey murder meant to “avenge” U.S. Mideast policy
…………………………….
In other words, he was waging violent Jihad against us because we dared to defend–no matter how sporadically–against violent Jihad.
HugoHackenbush says
Hope NJ has the death penalty. And…why was this “strict Muslim” not charged with treason? Did he not give “aid and comfort to the enemy” by killing US citizens? Don’t know all the legal technicalities here but I have yet to see one of these criminals charged with treason.
Here is the section from the constitution:
Section 3.
“Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.
The Congress shall have power to declare the punishment of treason, but no attainder of treason shall work corruption of blood, or forfeiture except during the life of the person attainted.”
From the US criminal code:
Ҥ2381. Treason
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.”
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 807; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(2)(J), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§1, 2 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §§1, 2, 35 Stat. 1088).
Section consolidates sections 1 and 2 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed.
The language referring to collection of the fine was omitted as obsolete and repugnant to the more humane policy of modern law which does not impose criminal consequences on the innocent.
The words “every person so convicted of treason” were omitted as redundant.
Minor change was made in phraseology.
Amendments
1994—Pub. L. 103–322 inserted “under this title but” before “not less than $10,000”.
WPM says
New Jersey and Washington State do not have the death penalty ,the feds could push for treason but I do not think they will. Many people have been sentence for crimes against the state in the past and have been pardon when the right “left wing president” comes into office. More then one FALN terrorist under Obama ,Clinton had his share of pardons .Brutal murder is easier to get a murder convection with little chance of getting out. It is more important to go after his supporters , the Islam network ,his Mosque , his friends and family that knew his plans .Go after his fellow traveling Islam Nazis , use RICO laws to bankrupt the Mosques who spread Islamic hate as a daily bread eaten to grow these losers.
J D S says
Personally I think laws should be passed to the effect that anyone who commits terrorism against the citizenry of the U.S., be he or she a citizen of the U.S. or not ..that person should be tried by the U.S and not by the state where the terrorism was committed and if even one citizen is killed during the act then the death penalty should be the law, if the perpetrator is found guilty. Just sayin…..
Lydia Church says
More “tolerance” on the loose!
FYI says
Does the “strict muslim” even know about his “prophet”?
You know………muhammed being a SLAVE TRADER IN BLACK PEOPLE.
To own black people as slaves is odious.
To sell one black slave is appaling:but to sell TWO BLACK SLAVES for one non-black slave is even worse!
….
because it shows the true nature of islam’s “prophet”.
mo would have the likes of this convert in chains!!
……. as we saw at the recent slave trading of African men in Libya
SAHIH MUSLIM 3901
Mo the slave trader in black people…
Niemoller says
This is the face of evil; don’t be cowed by his rationale; the nazis had theirs too. Remember what this Islamonazi wants: a state like ISIS, where non-Muslims are beheaded, raped, sold, enslaved, and butchered.
This cowardly wimp is the US Boko Haram. He’d be raping and executing Nigerian non-Muslims were he there. Or he’d be the Muslim terrorist in any of many dozens of countries–wherever Islam exists.
Our politicians have betrayed us and the basics of universal human rights; they take Islamic blood money; they dine with Islamists; they are collaborating with existential evil; they must be stopped.
Politicianophobia says
Just another manic muslim.