Is Sweden diverse enough yet? No. There will be much, much more of this. With Muslim migrants comes Sharia, which some will wish to implement in their new land. Multiculturalist dhimmis will be only too happy to oblige, although in this case one of the judges appears to be a hijab-wearing, Sharia-observant Muslim herself. Islamic law allows a man to beat his wife (in accordance with Qur’an 4:34) and devalues a woman’s testimony. Hence this ruling.
“‘Hair-Raising’: Sharia Law Makes Its Debut in Swedish Court,” Sputnik, March 6, 2018:
“The man stems from a good family, unlike the woman.” With this argument, a Swedish court has acquitted an Iraqi man charged with abusing his wife, sparking outrage over the first instance where “Sharia Law” was applied by the Nordic nation’s legal system.
In a landmark case, the Solna District Court has acquitted an Iraqi man suspected of abusing wife by pushing her against furniture, pulling her hair and hitting her face with a shoe. The court called the credibility of the woman’s testimony into question, stressing her “lowly” parentage, the daily newspaper Aftonbladet reported.
In addition to stressing that the man “came from a good family,” unlike the woman, the court ruled that the fact that the woman turned to the police instead of the husband’s family “further” undermined her credibility. According to the court, “the normal thing” to do “in these circles” would be to try and resolve the conflict within the family.
The ruling, adopted by a divided court, triggered an immediate response from Sweden’s legal circles.
“This is one of the most prejudiced and strange judgments I have read. Not completely unexpectedly dictated by two lay judges. Still no one in charge who wants to do something about the lay judge system?” former Swedish Bar Association president Bengt Ivarsson tweeted.
Prosecutor Josefine Dahlqvist appealed the ruling straight away, claiming that the ruling violated the foundations of Sweden’s legal system.
One of the two lay judges who freed the man is Center Party veteran Ebtisam Aldebe, who is known for having advocated special legislation for Sweden’s Muslims (especially in divorce and inheritance rights) in a 2006 interview with Swedish broadcaster SVT. Aldebe ran for parliament in 2014 and is a member of the social committee in Solna. Aldebe also played a key role in rejecting at least three Christian converts asylum during her time as board member in Stockholm’s Administrative Court, according to the Christian newspaper Världen Idag.
“I’ve ruled in many cases. I’ve ruled in favor of men in some cases and in favor of women in others. In this case, I followed the law. Swedish law,” Ebtisam Aldebe argued in her defense.
However, Center Party leader Annie Lööf condemned the ruling and called for both lay judges to leave their roles.
“Horrendous judgment in Solna. Hair-raising reasoning and values that have no place in a state built on legal principles. These values have no place in our party. Our politics are based on all people’s equal rights and value, and being equal before the law,” Lööf tweeted.
Roger Haddad, justice spokesman for the Liberal Party, which alongside the Center Party is part of the four-party center-right Alliance opposition, stressed that “politically appointed lay judges” were unacceptable.
“I definitely do not want those who are in favor of sharia laws in Sweden,” Haddad tweeted….
Dum Spiro says
Hey — HEY — Maybe he just pushed her against furniture LIGHTLY, pulled her hair LIGHTLY and hit her face with a shoe LIGHTLY!
LIGHTEN UP!
/sarc
Maybe no bruises showed…
— Spero
Cunamarra says
Yeah there was a case in New York where a Muslim man struck at his wife’s neck with a scimitar, lightly.
J D S says
Swedenofiniquity!
PaulM says
WOW!!! Well, if I had any doubts about Sweden being able to crawl out of the sewer they are in, no longer!!
Once a Nation abrogates it’s foundational laws and constitution that has sustained it through thick and thin for hundreds of years, as has now been demonstrated….that Nation is DONE FOR. The Event Horizon has officially been crossed.
Good bye Sweden. Shame on you for abandoning your people to a fascist, Dictatorial Regime. The blood of your people is on the hands of the political elitists. May you be rewarded accordingly..
tim gallagher says
Totally agree, PaulM. It’s a bizarre world we inhabit where, at least in Australia where I live, and I presume in all western countries, there’s this endless outrage about how terrible domestic violence against women is, and a TV ad campaign against domestic violence still running, ( all of which I agree with) but then you get this Muslim domestic violence perpetrator being let off. It’s pathetic. However, I do think there will be a fightback, even in countries like Sweden, so I don’t think it’s a permanent situation, a permanent surrender. I hope not at any rate. With Islam, it’s barbarism versus our civilisation. It’s them or us. Total incompatibility. Our civilised, foundational laws versus barbaric Sharia garbage. Muslims have to be kept out. What a mess Sweden seems to be at present.
PaulM says
I must say, I do agree with your rationale being applied for most countries. I believe in my heart that there are enough of us left that will eventually have no other recourse but self defense. Because without a doubt, Anarchy will abound, there simply are no other alternatives, NONE!!! Considering that our respective governments are such pusillanimous pansies and groveling, sniveling amoebas, laying there being stomped under the jack boots of muslims.
And I have no intention of standing around with my thumb up my ass whining like some gutless, cowardly, fascist leftist while my daughters are tortured, raped and then killed.
tim gallagher says
PaulM, I keep thinking it’s all about vast numbers of the populations of our countries waking up to evil menace that Islam represents and demanding our governments get tough. Unfortunately, so far there just don’t seem to be large enough numbers to force our governments (by voting in the awake and tough parties) to do the right and necessary things. Only countries like Hungary, Czech Republic and Poland seem to have large numbers of their populations awake to Islam. The recent developments in Italy look promising. I just hope the majority of people wake up or we are all in huge trouble. I agree with you about how weak our governments are, although I think our politicians are just ignorant fools who know nothing about Islam’s nature. If they knew how evil Islam is, they might actually get tougher. We’re going to get nowhere unless big segments of our populations wake up to Islam’s barbaric nature. In Australia, it hasn’t happened yet. I wish we were more like Hungary and had a leader like Orban.
elee says
Wasn’t there a recent item about Swedish libbers proclaiming how much they loved Islam?
Hey libbers, read up and wake up!
Isabellathecrusader says
She probably forgot to defrost something for dinner in which case this ruling was entirely justified.
The scariest thing in this case is that the woman judge believes she and all women are subject to the whims of men and is willing to enforce them no matter what the cost to women like the lady here who got royally screwed and even, to herself.
Terry Gain says
This idiot Judge is Islamophobic. – scared out of her mind by Islam. I doubt that she would allow a non-Muslim man to batter his wife and not get the punishment he deserves.
Isabellathecrusader says
I don’t think so Terry, she has a Muslim name not a Swedish one. And she rules Islamically because she believes in the Sharia. She’s got to go, now.
gravenimage says
Yes–sickening that Sweden is allowing this!
Kay says
Yes. I hope the outcry grows and is successful.
I see Mohammedens have figured how to work another of the West’s systems against their “hosts”. Probably this “lay” system worked before the influx of Mohammedens.
Chas49 says
Americans need to learn a lesson from this bs.
Marina says
Muslims should never be allowed to hold any high level positions.
Terry Gain says
Marina
If a country is stupid enough to allow Muslim immigration, it can’t and shouldn’t prevent Muslims from enjoying the same rights as all citizens. The only safe and effective way to defend against Islamization is not to allow them in. They have no right to be let in, but once here they can’t be discriminated against or we will destroy what we are trying to protect.
Timothy says
30.6% of Sweden will be Islamic by the middle of the century. This is Pew’s findings. That is a lot of sharia.
Karen says
It certainly is, and that is shocking.
gravenimage says
Horrifying.
Chaz says
Like Richard Pryor said, “when you go down to the courthouse, you will find just-us.” Not good to be woman in Sweden. Where are all the Swedish libtards, with their panties in a bunch, over this.
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
Even under the common law of evidence, evidence of a victim needs corroboration to make It reliable. under the sharia the act beating wife without following the stated in the Quran before that extent or where the beating is severe even if the steps are followed Will lead to dissolution of the marriage,which May harm the family. As such There is need for reliable evidence
CogitoErgoSum says
Ibrahim, I know that the Quran tells us that it is okay for a man to beat his wife if she disobeys him but I’m unable to find the verse that says it is to be done in front of several witnesses. Can you provide me the proper quote on that?
Westman says
An interesting argument, Ibrahim. How do you personally determine when it’s the right time to beat your wife and how severely?
Ashley says
There is something seriously wrong with you, Ibrahim.
Seriously wrong.
6woods says
Yep. His illness is called islam.
mortimer says
And the inbreeding of 50 generations.
Karen says
The point is that sharia rules of evidence are different for men and women; specifically, the bar is lower for men. This is called a double standard, as you very well know, so quit with the deception. You aren’t fooling anyone.
And by the way, where no evidence exists, it comes down to the credibility of the testimony. Sharia prejudices the decision against women in this respect also, so it is completely incompatible with Western values of equality under the law.
No Sharia in the West!
Terry Gain says
Ibrahim
Don’t forget that a woman’s evidence is worth half of a man’s, all justified by your barbaric “religion” because, according to your false prophet, women are deficient in intelligence.
AleX says
@ibe itace
Like prophet, like follower.
gravenimage says
The repulsive Ibrahim itace muhammed wrote:
Even under the common law of evidence, evidence of a victim needs corroboration to make It reliable.
…………………………
Right–under Islam it doesn’t matter if the wife is beaten to a bloody pulp and the husband has blood all over his fists–if she doesn’t have four adult male Muslims willing to vouch for her, she is f*cked.
Of course, she’d be f*cked in any case, since it is perfectly Halal for Muslims to beat their wives, if they so much as *fear* disobedience.
More:
under the sharia the act beating wife without following the stated in the Quran before that extent or where the beating is severe even if the steps are followed Will lead to dissolution of the marriage,which May harm the family. As such There is need for reliable evidence
…………………………
In other words, Muslims have to send their wives to separate beds *before* they beat the crap out of them–just to make sure it is properly Islamic.
As for this leading to the dissolution of the family, Ibrahim itace muhammed knows this is often bullsh*t–Shari’ah courts regularly refuse to grant beating victims divorces, and instead send the victims back to their abusers–it is only Muslim men who can divorce simply by reciting the “Triple Talaq”.
God, I hate Islam.
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
Ignorant Satan (holy spirit) worshiper Gravenimage, it is only in case of zina (adultery or fornication) that 4 male witnesses are required. In this case only two reliable winesses are required and in this case of matreating wife even wide spreading News of beating wife from neigbors is ok.
CRUSADER says
Now, now, Mr Irritates.
Go to your corner.
BEHAVE !!!
gravenimage says
Uhb huh…and shouldn’t Ibrahim itace muhammed remind us here that a woman’s testimony is worth half of a man’s in Islam?
Joe Creho says
Are there English classes anywhere near where you live, Ibrahim?
Ashley says
Ibrahim could mop up the floor if the spelling bee contained the following challenge words: FILTHY. PENIS. SODOMY. ANAL. MUTILIATION. URINE. EXCRETEMENT. BESTIALITY. WHORE. BEHEADING. GENITAL. SEMEN.
Just don’t expect a miracle if Ibrahim is presented with: CAT. TOASTER. BATHTUB.
He’ll fuck up.
gravenimage says
And don’t forget “foreskin”, Ashley–Ibrahim itace muhammed is obsessed with Infidel men’s foreskins.
Emilie Green says
“. . . the court ruled that the fact that the woman turned to the police instead of the husband’s family ‘further’ undermined her credibility.” [How does that even make sense?]
Turning to the husband’s family? That would have been the worse thing she might have done. Muslims are incredibly tribal.* Though she’s his wife, she still is considered a stranger, and will always be considered that. The husband’s family would have ganged up on her – and she knew that – to the point that her life would have been in danger.
*As the Muslim proverb goes, “Me against my brother, my brother and I against my cousin, and all of us against the stranger.”
Westman says
Yes. Guess whose family testified the woman was not from a “good” family? The Swedes are so busy with Epicureanism that they don’t see the guests have their own agenda.
Terry Gain says
It’s hard to believe that any Court in a western democracy wouldn’t consider this claim both scandalous and irrelevant.
gravenimage says
It’s only because Sweden has allowed Muslim judges to apply Shari’ah.
This is still utterly shocking. I knew things were bad in Sweden, but i had not believed they were anywhere near so far gone.
Does anyone know if a higher court is likely to overturn this appalling ruling?
Karen says
I wish I knew; I would certainly hope so. One good thing; I believe the “lay judge” responsible for this travesty has resigned.
Peter says
Sweden is no longer at the vanguard of women’s rights.
gravenimage says
That’s putting it mildly…
LeftisruiningCanada says
Not only are they NOT in the vanguard, it seems that they have switched sides and are now advancing in the opposite direction.
Westman says
The Monarch courts are back in a different form. Sweden has never escaped to freedom. They have no idea what “rule by the people” means. “The subject will do as the King’s court demands, even if it means women will be abused”. “Let the good times roll”.
Sam says
Good! Have Sweden enjoy Islam. Somehow I have no sympathy for Swedes. They deserve Islam
Linda says
At this point, I don’t really care what Muslims are doing as long as they’re only doing it to each other and not non-Muslims. However, this should be a warning to all women thinking of marrying a Muslim man. i.e. Don’t do it! Give Muslim men a wide berth.
gravenimage says
Oh, Muslims intend to impose all of this savagery on us, as well–and will be emboldened if we let them abuse Muslim women first.
Sentinel says
So in a dispute between a Muslim and a non-Muslim which law takes precedence ?
I have a horrible feeling that, since local law has already been deemed to be inferior by the courts, it is now worth any Muslim challenging the right for Sharia Law to take precedence in ANY legal case involving a Muslim.
Pack your bags and leave – while you still can. In Pakistan I believe it was the case that non-Muslims were not entitled to a passport.
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
Cogitoergosum, we have to follow thé standard scholarly interpretations of the Quran and Hadith by muslim jurists to avoid mischief. As such the muslim jurists deduced from the verse in suratu Nisa chapter 3 and Hadiths that the husband cannot béat his wife at Will. when she becomes so rude, he shall admonish her that what she is doing is bad against sharia. If she persist, he shall turn away from showing to her.If she persist he shall call her family to call her to order. If she persist he could resort to symbolic beating, not the one that Will cause injury. If the husband jumps to Last resort of symbolic béating or injures her, it Will be à ground for dissolution of the marriage by a sharia judge if she Proves It by calling reliable winesses in case the husband denies the allegation. If he admits It or the wife Proves It, the burden now shifts to him to Prove that he has exausted all the steps stated in the Quran. But if injury appears on her body, the husband has no defence because the sharia does not allow such beating.
Note:The holy prophet muhammad never béat any of his wives and advised Muslims to exercise restrain in losing their temper up to the extent of beating their lovely wives. It is a sign of virture for a good muslim not go to the extent of beating his wife even when he has exausted all the steps or has not cause on her.
Terry Gain says
Ibrahim
What does Islam say about the rights of a wife if her husband beats her, is dictatorial, rude, unclean, lazy or misogynistic. Or won’t control himself and confine himself to one spouse at a time.
ED says
Terry Gain,
Don’t believe Ibrahim’s vile lies. He cherry picks his Muslim jurists and scholars that support his position. He doesn’t mention all of the other scholars (or the sources themselves) that allow Muslim men to beat and rape their wives/sex slaves. He doesn’t mention how all of these other countries allow wife beating based on the expert opinion of their scholars and jurists. He pretends that is just a massive coincidence that this is a very common teaching throughout the Islamic world. Or why, even in the rare occurrence when an Islamic country tries to modernize its law system by making laws to protect women against violence, it excludes wives since the Quran promotes violence against women as a tool for the husband to maintain control. This is what recently happened in Morocco. https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/02/morocco-oks-law-against-violence-on-women-wives-excluded
He mentions “The Holy Prophet never beat any of his wives”. That’s not true. Muhammad beat his child bride, the one that he also sexually abused at the tender age of 9 (married her at age 6).
Muhammad “struck me on the chest which caused me pain, and then said: Did you think that Allah and His Apostle would deal unjustly with you?” — Aisha (Sahih Muslim 2127)
Throughout the Islamic sources you’ll see Muhammad and his followers committing all types of deplorable acts. Murder, wife abuse, rape, theft, suppression of speech, murdering apostates, etc. I would use the search bar on this site to read the sources for yourself (as well as the interpretation of these verses/sources from some of the most influential Muslims ever that confirm everything that Mr. Spencer says). From people like Ibrahim, you’ll get nothing but cherry-picking, half-truths, and lies. He’s not to be trusted. Proceed with caution. Take Care!
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
ignorant idiot ED, it was not à hostile assault .It was just lovely strike one can do even to his friend to draw his attention. Eg, one could hit the buttock of his wife saying you are nice.
gravenimage says
Ibrahim itace muhammed would have us believe that Muslims beating their wives to a pulp are just giving them “love taps”. *Ugh*.
Here is Saudi broadcaster Rania al-Baz, after her husband disfigured her:
https://www.google.com/search?q=Rania+al-Baz&rlz=1C1TSND_enUS657US657&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj9tNzCxt7ZAhVNXK0KHQJdB10Q_AUICigB&biw=780&bih=364#imgrc=TXwL2VEnQj9UvM:
PaulM says
What UTTER BULLSHIT!!! Only gutless, spineless, filthy, diseased, degenerate, depraved fascist muslim cowards who follow a non existent god and a fat little midget (muhammud) who got about on a flying donkey would command their acolytes to kick the living shit out of women, rape them, torture and then kill them. All because they were not breathing properly or some other insanity.
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
Paulm, How did jesus become Godman and begotten son of God at the same time ? when did Jesus as Godman creat the universe, was It before he was born or after ?How did God beget jesus at the begining and he became God ?
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
Did God beget jesus at the begining or when he was conceived by the power of holy Ghost after was born ?
gravenimage says
Ibrahim itace muhammed has no problem with Muslims beating their wives, but he is *enraged* over the Christian idea of a loving God. *Very* telling.
PaulM says
What the hell has that got to do with the incontrovertible fact that you and your ilk dry hump babies, rape little girls and torture, maim and kill women?
And, if you read the “True Bible” instead of the dishrag piece of fascist shit that is your koran you would note the following, (I don’t know why I bother…..to embarrass you I guess) that Jesus is/was God. Did all of the creating, Divested Himself of his Godhead to become human, died for mankind, was resurrected back to Godhood.
Ya, I know, you will find that hard to believe and understand, but I’ll tell you what, that is so much easier to understand and to believe than to accept that some fat little dwarf who got around on a flying donkey and went about dry humping babies and mercilessly raping his 9 year old “wife” and other children. And then professed to be blessed by some vile disgusting non existent pervert of a pagan god called allah…..give me a break.
6woods says
Listen, you moron. That’s filthy islamic law, which should hold absolutely no sway anywhere in the West. Your disgusting prophet (pig excrement be upon him) decreed all kinds of putrid, revolting, unspeakable things to be law.The fact that you’re defending this ugliness underscores, YET AGAIN, that Islam is a cancer on the body of mankind.
AleX says
@ibe itace
‘Symbolic beating?
This is how they call abuse in Nigeria?
MFritz says
Liar. And not from Nigeria. Don’t feed the troll!
gravenimage says
The vile Ibrahim itace muhammed wrote:
Cogitoergosum, we have to follow thé standard scholarly interpretations of the Quran and Hadith by muslim jurists to avoid mischief.
………………….
“Mischief” here means anything that is un-Islamic. Beating your wives is certainly islamic.
More:
As such the muslim jurists deduced from the verse in suratu Nisa chapter 3 and Hadiths that the husband cannot béat his wife at Will. when she becomes so rude, he shall admonish her that what she is doing is bad against sharia. If she persist, he shall turn away from showing to her.If she persist he shall call her family to call her to order. If she persist he could resort to symbolic beating, not the one that Will cause injury. If the husband jumps to Last resort of symbolic béating or injures her, it Will be à ground for dissolution of the marriage by a sharia judge if she Proves It by calling reliable winesses in case the husband denies the allegation. If he admits It or the wife Proves It, the burden now shifts to him to Prove that he has exausted all the steps stated in the Quran. But if injury appears on her body, the husband has no defence because the sharia does not allow such beating.
………………….
What crap. Qur’an 3:43 affirms that Muslims can beat their wives if they so much as fear disobedience. And this Sura says *nothing* about the beating being light or symbolic.
And note his out that she can only get a divorce if four Muslim males happen to hanging out at the house witnessing the beating and willing to testify on her behalf. How often would *this* happen?
More:
Note:The holy prophet muhammad never béat any of his wives and advised Muslims to exercise restrain in losing their temper up to the extent of beating their lovely wives. It is a sign of virture for a good muslim not go to the extent of beating his wife even when he has exausted all the steps or has not cause on her.
………………….
What crap. Muhammed beat his child bride. Further, he laughed when his brutal companions beat their own wives.
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
Ignorant Satan (holy spirit) worshiper Gravenimage, Hadith is the First guide in the interpretations of the Quran. when the verse states”fadribuhunna(you could béat them) “the hadith explains”darban ghair mubarrahin ( beating that never causes injury )”.In another Hadith the prophet explained that the beating shall be symbolic just to call the wife to order as last resort.
CRUSADER says
Now, now, Mr Irritates.
Go to your corner.
BEHAVE !!!!
gravenimage says
Firstly, the Qur’an says *nothing* about the beating being light or symbolic. Then, notice that women are not allowed to beat their husbands, symbolically or otherwise.
Here are some other Islamic texts. Here is the “Prophet” laughing about wife beating:
Jabir b. ‘Abdullah reported: Abu Bakr came and sought permission to see Allah’s Messenger. He found people sitting at his door and none amongst them had been granted permission, but it was granted to Abu Bakr and he went in. Then came ‘Umar and he sought permission and it was granted to him, and he found Allah’s Apostle sitting sad and silent with his wives around him. He (Hadrat ‘Umar) said: I would say something which would make the Holy Prophet laugh, so he said: Messenger of Allah, I wish you had seen (the treatment meted out to) the daughter of Kharija when she asked me some money, and I got up and slapped her on her neck. Allah’s Messenger laughed and said: They are around me as you see, asking for extra money. Abu Bakr then got up went to ‘Aisha and slapped her on the neck, and ‘Umar stood up before Hafsa and slapped her saying: You ask Allah’s Messenger which he does not possess. They said: By Allah, we do not ask Allah’s Messenger for anything he does not possess.” Muhammad laughed at hearing about his friend Umar slapping his wife when they asked for more money…
Ren says
Good for her since she’s adhering to islam that allows a man to beat his wife. Stupidity comes at a cost.
abad says
Swedenstan
What is WRONG with Sweden’s leaders to allow Moslems onto their oil??!!
6woods says
One World Order. Population Replacement. It’s deliberate, and, unfortunately, unstoppable.
StellaSaidSo says
Deliberate, yes. Unstoppable, no – provided we all wake up in time. We are still a numerical majority, and the globalists just experienced another setback, so let’s not quit yet!
6woods says
That was my point. If ‘we’ haven’t woken up after 30,000+ terror attacks world-wide just since 9/11, then when will we? And we’re very
close to enacting blasphemy laws here in Canada.
Mockingjay says
“The court called the credibility of the woman’s testimony into question, stressing her “lowly” parentage…,”
– What the HELL is this, Sweden? You are now also, in addition to sharia law, applying the caste system?
– A woman from a “lowly” family simply has no case against a “high” family?
Good God, please help me. This can’t be happening.
– Was the Europe I’ve been living in all my life nothing but a LIE?
tedh754 says
Islam is doing to Sweden what even Hitler chose not to.
gravenimage says
Sweden: Court rules using Sharia, acquits man who beat his wife, discounts her testimony
……………………..
This is *sickening*–this is not a Shari’ah court, but a *Swedish court*.
That they are ruling based on family background–determined *by whom*?–completely goes against Western values of equality before the law.
How is being *a wife beater* proof of a good family?
And where are beaten women supposed to go to their abuser’s family, rather than the police and courts? Only in Muslim “circles”, where she would have no other recourse.
Of course, it now appears she has no other recourse *in Sweden itself*. *Ugh*.
6woods says
This woman should tear off her hijab, burn it, declare Islam to be pig-swill, and turn to her feminist sisters in Sweden for help. Sadly, those “feminist sisters” will drag her back to the wolf’s den and lock her in.
God (and I’m an atheist), I loathe virtue-signalling leftists more than I despise mo’s putrid cult…and that’s sayin’ somethin’!
Chas49 says
Just goes to a long way to proving how far gone the EU really is. Yea, we really need to follow their leadership. I’ll get right on that.
brane pilot says
Political power is an end in itself. It requires no justification or higher purpose.
When the destruction of a functioning society is a path to political power, as it is everywhere in Western Civilization, that path will be pursued.
Why the destruction of the West is a path to political power is a mystery for philosophers.
To celebrate the destruction of the imperfect is virtue, even if it results in a descent into savagery.
MFritz says
Sweden is dead. Once such a “secondary” rule of justice is established in a country, it’s basically no longer a democracy.
Lydia Church says
And thus democracy did not die with a bang, but with a whimper in Sweden… as the masses went about their daily business…
and the global kabal hopes no one will notice, there will be no outcry, they will call any outcry ‘bigotry,’ and this will slowly become the ‘new normal.’
dragaozao says
Hey! Isn´t today the international women’s day? Well, then… Great time to be a woman in Sweden! And the future promisses even better moments… After all, the swedish government is the most feminist in the world. So they call themselves.
AP says
The judge is another under cover Muslim. Plain and simple.
Politicianophobia says
What would you expect from a judge wearing a hijab?
I bra him, I would like to tell you to f*ck off but you would probably thigh for an extended period of time and then attack some sweet, little girl, you being a filthy, feckless, freak, fornicator muslim.
Christian Beltram says
Donald Trump is President of the United States today because the people who voted for him do not want cases like this to ever occur in the United States.
Politicianophobia says
Damn, I know better, I was angry with I bra him. If his Mother, Grandmother, Great Grandmother, Great, Great Grandmother and Great, Great, Great Grandmother were all halfwits and hysterical women, as Islam suggests, I know where he is probably in IQ range, and should not pick on him.
UNCLE VLADDI says
Letting foreign laws rule your country is to let foreign governments rule your country – it’s clearly TREASON, and should be treated as such.
Hogdude says
Goodbye, Sweden. We hardly knew ye.
gush says
So, reverse duluth model?
Yeah, and people wonder why they love islamists so much.
Youareidiots says
Sweden HATES it’s children and wives, they have chosen evil and terror for the rest of there miserable lives, nothing like a self hating swede!