The bannings of Martin Sellner, Brittany Pettibone, Lauren Southern and now Lutz Bachmann are just the latest of many, many examples of how the British government bans foes of jihad terror while admitting its proponents.
Pamela Geller and I are banned from entering the country for the crime of telling the truth about Islam and jihad. According to Breitbart, “Sellner, who described the detention centre as looking akin to a typical American prison, said he was told by authorities that his speaking at Hyde Park could cause violence and disrupt community cohesion.” That’s just what they claimed about Pamela Geller and me: that our visit could cause violence and disrupt community cohesion. But we, of course, have never advocated or approved of any violence. The UK Home Office meant that our visit could cause violence from Muslims. They were bowing to jihadist intimidation.
Meanwhile, Britain has a steadily lengthening record of admitting jihad preachers without a moment of hesitation.
Syed Muzaffar Shah Qadri’s preaching of hatred and jihad violence was so hardline that he was banned from preaching in Pakistan, but the UK Home Office welcomed him into Britain.
The UK Home Office also admitted Shaykh Hamza Sodagar into the country, despite the fact that he has said: “If there’s homosexual men, the punishment is one of five things. One – the easiest one maybe – chop their head off, that’s the easiest. Second – burn them to death. Third – throw ’em off a cliff. Fourth – tear down a wall on them so they die under that. Fifth – a combination of the above.”
Theresa May’s relentlessly appeasement-minded government also admitted two jihad preachers who had praised the murderer of a foe of Pakistan’s blasphemy laws. One of them was welcomed by the Archbishop of Canterbury.
Nor does the UK admit only preachers of jihad terror. It admits jihad terrorists as well, even when it knows they are jihad terrorists. The Muslim migrant teen who bombed the London Tube told border officials that he was trained by ISIS, but was admitted anyway.
Meanwhile, the UK banned three bishops from areas of Iraq and Syria where Christians are persecuted from entering the country.
“PEGIDA Founder Lutz Bachmann Banned from UK After Officials Find Speakers’ Corner Speech in Baggage,” by Jack Montgomery, Breitbart, March 18, 2018:
PEGIDA founder Lutz Bachmann has been prevented from entering Britain to deliver a speech at Speakers’ Corner, partly on the grounds that he “knows” identitarian activist Martin Sellner.
Bachmann had planned on delivering a speech written by the Generation Identity leader, who was recently detained along with YouTube political pundit Brittany Pettibone and then ejected from the country, partly on the grounds that GI is “viewed in the UK as a right wing organization” and partly on the grounds that Pettibone intended to “interview Tommy Robinson — a far right leader whose materials and speeches incite racial hatred”, according to seemingly official documents.
Bachmann also shared a picture of a document which he claims is from the officials who stopped him, which asserts that PEGIDA is “involved in the promotion and incitement of racial hatred and division of communities” and notes that “[by] your own admission during interview you have known [Sellner] well for some years” as grounds for denying his Free Movement rights.
“A speech was discovered during a baggage search which you have stated you are intending to deliver to the general public at speakers corner, Hyde Park,” the poorly written document states.
“This speech relates to your organization “Pediga” [sic] which is devoted to “combating the threat of Islam”, the activities of this organization have been involved in the promotion and incitement of racial hatred and division of communities. Furthermore this speech appears to have been written and it is believed should have been delivered by Martin Sellner an individual who is a member of an Austrian group which also promotes racial hatred and works against community cohesion and who according to your own admission during interview you have known very well for some years.
“According to Home Office records Mr Martin Sellner was recently refused admission to the UK on the grounds of public policy which he refers to in his speech which you intend to deliver.”…
MFritz says
Not worth the paper it is printed on. As the UK itself has become a nation no longer worth any respect.
D J says
Well there were a couple of thousand of us there I guess. It was non-violemt and the Police were not threatemed.
It was bigger than PegidaUK’s Solihull stroll, but we need more ordinary people to stamd up amd be counted.
At least the banning orders caused a Streisand effect with thousamds already viewing the videos.
gravenimage says
Thanks for the view on the ground, D J.
Glad there was such a large turnout. I had heard that Tommy Robinson was one of the speakers. Was this correct?
D J says
He was the only speaker.
It was cheerfully noisy so it was a good idea to print out the speech.
gravenimage says
Thank you, D J.
garbut says
There were outbreaks of violence by muslims which are now on YouTube.
But overall, antifa etc,were vastly outnumbered by patriots.
This was a huge endorsement of Tommy Robinson whose channel is attracting thousands
and thousands of new subscribers EVERY single day now.
The police have to think twice now about harassing him.
Banning your opponents has backfired badly on the UK authorities.
gravenimage says
Yay!
LeftisruiningCanada says
Great News! Was concerned for the safety of all good British folk there.
Thanks for the updates 🙂
StellaSaidSo says
Well said, garbut. I watched live coverage of this event on several channels, and it was very clear that some individuals wanted to cause trouble. Fortunately, they were vastly outnumbered by patriotic Britons defending free speech. The authorities have made a huge error in attempting to silence dissent.
Jayell says
And, speaking as a UK national, I totally agree. I’m writing this in Hong Kong (which is supposed to be China but actually feels more like London-by-the-Sea as it might have been 60-70+ years ago) and the sense of being in a ‘civilised’ environment surounded by ‘civilised’ people (compared with London) is quite overwhelming. This impression is somewhat magnified by the lasting impression of having to go through Heathrow Airport, where the ancestors of the vast majority of the employees would never have been around the place to know Winston Churchill, or Queen Victoria, King Charles I, William Shakespeare and Henry VIII, let alone learn anything about traditional British manners and the English words ‘please’ and ‘thank you’. And the young female operating the X-ray machine in Security was wearing a headscarf!!!!! Talking about Winston Churchill, I had the pleasure of watching “The Darkest Hour’ on the plane, including the scene where Churchill took a trip on the London Underground to Westminster Station – which never happened, ‘Westminster Station’ looked exactly like the abandoned Strand Station (completely different) with the wrong kind of train and ‘Londoners’ on board who were hardly likely to have been within 8-10,000 miles of London at the time the film was set. So what else did they re-write about Churchill and anything else in UK history? This is the UK’s ‘darkest hour’ now (ask Tommy Robinson) and I’m not sure that I want to be on that plane going back.
DFD says
Hi Jayell, I am Anglo-German. I grew up in Berlin and London, considered these to be my home towns. Not any more! Not any more? For many, many years by now. Your post described it accurately…
Whenever I have to visit London, it’s an alien place, and I’m not referring to the buildings, towns and cities change. But the people there, they aren’t Londoners. Sad.
gravenimage says
So grim. London is–or was–one of the great cities of the world. This is fast being eroded, especially with the hideous invasion of Muslims there.
Wellington says
And the Queen and royal family have said nothing about this dismal and completely unnecessary loss of freedom, gravenimage. I have gone from being an admirer of the British monarchy to being an admirer of it no more.
When your free nation has gone to an unfree status and you have the capacity to thwart this in some way, even though it may go against technical constitutional requirements (and I would argue that it doesn’t but whatever, nonetheless, et al.), and you still do nothing, then you are yourself a nothing, or actually something less than a nothing.
Once again I invoke what LBJ (and I am not a big fan of this man) said about the American Presidency when told he shouldn’t put the Presidency on the line, to wit, what good is the Presidency if you can’t put it on the line from time to time? Ditto for the British monarchy. Though the political parties of the UK are certainly more at fault for allowing the loss of freedom in a once free nation, the monarchy of the UK simply cannot escape all responsibility here.
The Queen and her family have let their nation down. Big time.
Axolotl Grunch says
Wellington. The monarchy is an anachronism and long passed it’s sell-by date. Pretty much the only thing it could do to justify it’s existence is the one thing it never does – speak-out on behalf of ‘the little people’
gravenimage says
Yes, Wellington–the Queen should speak out.
And Axolotl Grunch, monarchs *have* served as the conscience of their nations before–just look at the Netherlands and Denmark during WWII.
J D S says
Apparently anyone in the UK or anyone wanting to go there, who speaks out against the wiles of islam is just automatically classed as a racist (This is just what the Islamist want to happen everywhere and have been striving for it to happen from the very beginning with their most recent re approach to world domination) and it is working just as planned.
Jean Terry says
Political correctness is the ruin of a country. It is politically correct in Britain to spew hatred and rage against people and groups of people the Islamists don’t like. But it is not okay to just tell it like it is. The truth. May and others sit in their ivory towers while all the citizens she is supposed to protect are in danger. It also shows when the wrong people, usually liberals, take charge the state begins to turn against it’s own people while supporting those who break the law. England and Europe as we know them are disappearing.
Frank 95054 says
Well stated. The only recourse is a civil war to restore Freedom. The UK’s political class, as well as, its Royals betray the people for Islamist ideology. The flooding of England with Muslims was a planned invasion by those who seek to eliminate a Nation, and its borders.
gravenimage says
Just voting in some sane candidates would help–no need to civil war.
gravenimage says
for civil war
StellaSaidSo says
Correct, Frank. It is all planned. As FDR observed, ‘there are no accidents in politics’. Civil war is inevitable if the floodgates are not closed immediately and problems addressed. The ballot box is only a solution if time permits and the right candidates are available. And even then there is no guarantee that the necessary change will follow.
J D S says
I just can’t understand the peoples, in all of Europe,not just the UK…..This Islam take over has been ongoing for some time now and elections have also been ongoing but I haven’t seen a change in the government’s operation pertaining to Islam and it’s adherents….So that makes me think that it’s the citizens fault or they don’t vote at all or no one runs that has a different perspective or Muslim voters outnumber the Brits or elections are rigged…..I have put forth several scenarios ….Any suggestions out there in JW land. I’m also going out on a limb and saying the U.S, Canada and Australia and Mexico as well, are ripe for the picking also..Any thoughts there???
dumbledoresarmy says
‘”No accidents in politics”.. that has to be one of the silliest lines I have ever heard. It reflects modern hubris, the idea that we can be as gods.
Our medieval forebears knew better – their grimly realistic grasp of the limits of mere human capacity is summed up in the famous chant “O Fortuna/ velut luna..”.
Rabbie Burns knew it too – “… the best-laid plans o’mice and men/ gang aft a-gley”.
When good plans made by good people do not unfold as hoped-for, then it is confusing and sad; a mystery.
But as for the evil plans made by evil people… especially when they are long-range plans with grandiose ideas of transcending time.. are *sure* to come a cropper, more often than not; quite probably more often than the plans made by good and decent people. Because a good person will act with humility, not overreaching, and with attention to reality; whereas it is of the nature of evil to have HUGE blind spots, to overreach, to deceive itself as well as others. see the Psalms when it talks about the evil person falling into the pit that he has dug for others. To assign virtual omnipotence and omniscience to evil people – or even to evil demons! – is really, really foolish… and is just what evil people, or evil spirits also, *want* you to do. But it’s wrong.
NO mere mortal, fallible human being, no matter how clever, no matter how good OR evil, can foresee all ends! We cannot fully foresee let alone micromanage the future actions, thoughts, responses of our friends or family, let alone of millions of strangers. We are not gods, we are not God. Therefore: CHANCE *will* play a part. Unforeseen consequences will happen.. over and over again. The sheer contingency of life on this planet guarantees it.
In the space-opera novels of Lois McMaster Bujold there is a much wiser line that is quoted, possibly from a source in military history – “NO battle plan survives first-contact with the enemy”.
gravenimage says
Agreed, DDA.
LeftisruiningCanada says
Agreed again, DDA
DFD says
“…England and Europe as we know them are disappearing…”
RAPIDLY!
Jayell says
‘England’ – the home of the English? I’m English, and a lot of it certainly doesn’t feel like ‘home’ any more. And London,
(and everything it used to stand for) has been less and less an ‘English’ capital city for years. According to Tommy Robinson’s experience, you can’t even say what you want at Speaker’s Corner any more if the Authorities (no doubt influenced by the current Mayor and his cronies) don’t like what they think you’ll say. That’s an unofficial world heritage site that’s even been enjoyed by Marx snd Lenin that’s now being destroyed. When a rail line through East London was re-opened a few years ago, the locals wanted to rename a station in the infamous borough of Tower Hamlets ‘Bangla Town’, and you don’t need a Ph.D. to work out who was behind that! And that symbol of pride from a community whose sole claims to fame in the capital have been to import gross public corruption, acid attacks, and to drain welfare resources. ‘China Town’ has existed peacefully in London’s West End for many decades, but the locals there never ever suggested renaming any tube stations.
Anne Smith says
My is far too busy protecting her own job – possibly the only thing she actually cares about – than to bother about protecting all the genuine British people in UK.
She seems to think the Muslim vote is the one thing which can keep her on top – to which end she will grovel and cringe in the most sickening fashion.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aFQslqJZ4qQ
Gail says
Well, Khan was elected Mayor, by whom???
dumbledoresarmy says
Mostly by the Muslims, who swarm in certain key portions of the city; but even given that, they ‘punched above their weight’ (that is, above their actual demographic weight, even though that is already considerable) by deploying with a heaping dollop of voter fraud (postal votes, etc).
gravenimage says
A lot of foolish native Brtions also believed they were being “open minded” in casting a vote for this Muslim thug.
LeftisruiningCanada says
“Thou Shalt Not Anger The Muslims.”
LeftisruiningCanada says
(thought shalt not oppose they enslavement)
Karen says
“Community Cohesion” is more important than you, the individual, so please disappear.
Karen says
Groupthink, the filthy legacy of leftist thinking.
LeftisruiningCanada says
Exactly. When the basic unit of a nation become “the community”, there is no limit to the evils which may be inflicted upon the individual.
The individual doesn’t really exist.
dumbledoresarmy says
‘Community cohesion’ seems to me to be code for “Dhimmitude”.
And as such it is, of course, a Big Lie and reversal of reality. Because the *last* thing that Islam brings to any society is ‘community cohesion’… one of the ummah’s main battle tactics is, in fact, ‘split the camp’, by identifying, exploiting and exacerbating pre-existing divisions/ fault lines within the targeted faith group, nation, or society, and *also* – if such divisions/ fault lines do not already exist, or are minimal – *endeavouring to *create* division and set people against each other. Besides, of course, the simple fact that orthodox Islam *divides* the world into two camps – Dar al Islam, Conquered Territory, and Dar al Harb, Territory of War, the latter to be warred against by any and all means, unceasingly, until it is destroyed and replaced by dar al Islam. And also the fact that orthodox Islam practises a cult-based apartheid system, namely, the Dhimma, dividing its ‘societies’ into Ubermenschen (Muslims) and despised, degraded, bullied, abused and exploited Untermenschen (Dhimmis).
Muslims and Islamophiles are the very last people who should be lecturing *anyone* about ‘community cohesion’.
The Ummah is targeting the *entire Infidel* world, whether east or west, free or unfree or semi-free, and always has done, for this sort of nasty game of ‘split the camp’. Even within the dar al Islam, the different types of dhimmi (Jews and Christians, for example, in places like Egypt or Mesopotamia or Turkey) were routinely played off against each other, by their Muslim overlords and oppressors.
Meanwhile, tragically, authoritarian and highly-corrupt Russia fears and suspects the West and is playing – and has been, ever since the Communists first took over – similar vile and stupid games, but aimed mostly at the West rather than at other totalitarians whether Muslim or non-Muslim. And I’ll bet that totalitarian communist China is playing the same ‘split the camp’ of its perceived enemies – all free or semi-free countries – as well, and would be very happy for the mohammedans to weaken and destroy them.
Human sin and folly on the macro scale is a very depressing spectacle.
Karen says
Yes, very depressing. Imagine a free and democratic Russian republic and China republic, and the force for good they would be in the world. Great post!
gravenimage says
True, DDA.
StellaSaidSo says
‘The individual doesn’t really exist.’
This is exactly where we’re headed if the elites have their way.
‘Communitarianism’ (and more) explained –
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c37XfgxnxVI
LeftisruiningCanada says
I’ll listen to that as an mp3 soon.
The first few minutes mention many familiar things. Should be interesting to see where she goes with it all. Thanks.
Communitarianism is important. It’s a key idea in both communism and fascism. It also makes me feel ill.
StellaSaidSo says
Communitarianism is explained in the first few minutes, but the whole lecture is worth watching, along with others by Rosa Koire, who has been campaigning against Agenda 21 in the US for several years. Here she is in Santa Rosa, Calif, in 2011. (Warning: this info should make us all feel ill.)
httsp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ugaQzc7OpmY
StellaSaidSo says
Oops, caffeine time. Try again:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ugaQzc7OpmY
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
It was inevitable that free speech would come under constraints with the evolution of media, especially TV and the Internet. But Islam is the lube that greases the skids. No better reason to shut somebody up than fear of angering the already restive Moslem populations recently grown on Infidel soil.
gravenimage says
Actually, APF, I disagree–television and the internet, especially the latter–should lead to *more* freedom of speech, not less.
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
Decades ago Marshal McLuhan published a book called The Medium Is The Message in which he postulated that response behaviors to electronic media would be triggered by whether the content was hot or cold. So, true about alternative sources made newly available by the Internet, but the shutdown of opinion is pervasive, especially as impelled by prevailing opinions pre-formed by the education system, entertainment and elsewhere.
Just look at colleges today. Free speech is low on the list on campus.
gravenimage says
APF, McLuhan posited that moral evaluation of content delivered via a medium such as television is virtually impossible. I simply don’t believe that this is the case–certainly, it never has been for me.
Moreover, there has actually been *less* censorship on television, with the rise of first UHF stations, then cable, then Roku and Netflix, etc.
This basic trend is even more the case with the internet, where you find all kinds of opinion.
As for the crushing of freedom of speech, I think this has far more to do with the widespread embrace of hard leftism, and far less to do with the invention of television or computers or other technology.
StellaSaidSo says
Exactly, APF. The internet has provided the public with alternative news sources. That those who seek to control the narrative would attempt to silence those who challenge it is no surprise.
Gail says
I did not see any British or Auzzie papers covering the Speakers Corner event or the ousting of the 4 free speech advocates. Anyone out there who maybe saw coverage. Mark Stein, Fox news??? BBC?
gravenimage says
Gail, Mark Steyn did indeed cover part of this story, here:
“Speakers Cornered”
https://www.steynonline.com/8516/speakers-cornered
Michael Copeland says
It is curious how the UK’s porous border, that has admitted unknown thousands of illegals, suddenly becomes strict, effective, and closed to speakers who tell the truth.
Flavius Claudius Iulianus says
That is very telling, isn’t it?
StellaSaidSo says
Yep. It tells us, loud and clear, exactly who the British gov’t represents. Normal, decent people who ask awkward questions are not welcome, but Muslim hate preachers and rape gangs go about their vile business unimpeded.
Flavius Claudius Iulianus says
+1
And it also tells us that the influx of “migrants” is not an unintentional consequence of world events. It is intentional and has a purpose: the Great Replacement.
Benedict says
“According to Home Office records Mr Martin Sellner was recently refused admission to the UK on the grounds of public policy which he refers to in his speech which you intend to deliver.”…
……………………….
So what’s the problem? Mr Martin Sellner should mail the speech he intended to deliver to the “Free Speech Society” in Britain and let one of the members here – with power in his voice – perform the speech on his behalf at Hyde Park Corner and invite the police to listen while thanking them for the publicity.
You can keep people out of Britain but you can’t keep words out of Britain.
DFD says
Good point!
—————
Benedict says
Correction: Speakers’ Corner instead of Hyde Park Corner.
dumbledoresarmy says
That is precisely what happened.
Indeed, Sellner wrote a new speech, and gave it to Tommy Robinson, and Tommy delivered it… to *two thousand* people who braved deep snow on the transport routes and freezing cold, to be there in person. (Probably as many again would have come, had they been physically *able*).
brane pilot says
I can remember Eisenhower.
I can tell you for a fact that what was once called ‘England’ bears no resemblance to the political insane asylum that has taken its place.
Open borders is the tool that has been used to transform once functional societies into polyglot ghettos.
In defeating Hitler in Europe, the USA merely enabled something as bad or worse to take root.
HItler at least understood that Europeans have a right to an ethnic and cultural identity.
These new totalitarians, seek to debase Europeans in their own ancient homelands.
Look to South Africa for the end game they are pursuing.
There is a very good reason that South Africa is experiencing a media blackout in the Western press.
Wellington says
So, the USA is the real guilty party in WWII and not Hitler? Should have just let Hitler has his way and all that.
Ah, where to begin? Well, I’ll begin here: A la Joe Louis, whatever was wrong with America or the West, it ain’t nothin’ Hitler could have fixed (all the while he was murdering 6 million Jews, 3 million Poles, et al.)
Reconsider.
gravenimage says
Spot on, Wellington–and thanks for that quote.
Moreover, Hitler did not believe that Jews or Gypsies or Slavs had a right to their ethnic and cultural identity–or even their own lives.
gravenimage says
Oh, we’ve heard *this* before–that if only we had allowed evil to prevail without a fight seventy years ago that–somehow–all would be well today.
Firstly, you fight the what you face in the here and now. What if you were somehow able to learn that if the West is able to defend herself against that Islam now that it somehow strengthens China, which is poised to wipe us out with nuclear bombs in the 2090s? Would you roll over for Islam now?
I wouldn’t. I would face the evil that confronts us now, and hope that our children and grandchildren will be able to face off whatever threats arise in the future.
Whatever you might believe, supinely caving in to evil does *not* make us safer, nor does it set a good precedent and model for our children.
Moreover, you must not be aware of how Islamophilic Hitler was–he admired Islam while considering Christianity weak.
Things are bad enough today dealing with oppressive dhimmi European governments like that in Britain today. We might, instead, have to face down the SS and the death camps–this would *not* be an improvement.
Karen says
I am sorely tempted to mark a stack of Robert Spencer books with sticky notes that say, “Free, please take one”, stuff them in a suitcase, and hop on a plane for the UK, just to see what happens.
No Muzzies Here says
The UK checks luggage to find out if you object to the Islamization of the UK. If you do, you are blocked. However, it freely admits individuals who plan to Islamize the UK through violent means.
gravenimage says
UK bans German Pegida founder after finding speech by other banned person in his luggage
………………………………
This is insane–more and more crushing of freedom of speech in Britain. This would be hideous enough in any case, of course, but that there are no such bans in most cases on Imams calling for the destruction of the UK and slaughter of her people makes this all the more grotesque.
I remember my English mother telling me about Speaker’s Corner in Hyde Park when I was a child. You could say *anything* there–even talk about overthrowing the government–the only thing not allowed were direct calls to murder individuals. Anything else, on any topic, was fine.
I heard about Speaker’s Corner periodically, but then heard little about it for decades. It seemed to be an eccentric bit of anachronism that was not much needed anymore, because freedom of speech was so general in the UK that it was not necessary any longer.
Would that this were true now. It seems that now one can no longer speak freely even at Speaker’s Corner, even if the speech is entirely non-violent–if it is not “poltically correct, and runs afoul of the dishonest whitewash of the savagery of Islam. Insane.
mortimer says
The HOME OFFICE is CONFLATING race with religion and therefore their ban can be challenged in court.
The Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006 AMENDED the Public Order Act 1986 by adding Part 3A. That Part says, “A person who uses threatening words or behaviour, or displays any written material which is THREATENING, is guilty of an offence if he intends thereby to stir up religious hatred.” The Part protects freedom of expression by stating in Section 29J:
“NOTHING in this Part shall be read or given effect in a way which PROHIBITS or RESTRICTS discussion, CRITICISM or expressions of ANTIPATHY, dislike, ridicule, insult or abuse of particular religions or the BELIEFS or PRACTICES of their adherents, or of any other belief system or the BELIEFS or practices of its adherents, or proselytising or urging adherents of a different religion or belief system to cease practising their religion or belief system.”
Conclusion: SINCE CRITICIZING and expressing ANTIPATHY towards ISLAMIC PRACTICES (that is towards the IDEOLOGY of Islam) is LEGAL in the UK, the Home Office is breaking the law by banning the freedom to EXPRESS ANTIPATHY TOWARDS ISLAMIC BELIEFS or PRACTICES.
gravenimage says
This is entirely logical, Mortimer–as such, I’m not sure you would get very far in the British courts these days…
DFD says
From Europe
==========
1st the BAD NEWS:
————————–
Martin, Brittany, and Lauren have already been expelled. They want to sue the UK or the UK gov. ‘Could work… Lutz Bachman now waits for deportation.
She’s rather busy, Sharia May, isn’t she? The ‘free press’ is of course fully supportive.
I wrote a post about this on the 10th, there I also wrote about Kornelia Kirchweger, affectionately known as the ‘Brain Bitch’ and her speech scheduled for the 23rd in Linz. Same link as for Sellner & Co. i.e. https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/03/germany-muslim-migrant-crime-increases-61-in-just-one-region#comment-1855949
GOOD NEWS:
——————-
Why did I come back to that? Well, Sellner and Kirchweger are both Austrians. Now, Austria and Germany both operate an organization called “Verfassungschutz” (VS), internal state police, secret. Their job is to protect the constitution from enemies of the constitution – in Germany that’s run by Heiko Maas, and therewith by Annetta Kahane… That is to say the VS offices are thoroughly infiltrated by left wingers, that is school of Frankfurt.
But in Austria there’s a change, with the FPÖ in power. The FPÖ prepared secretly a raid upon the VS office by the EGS, which is not in its legal area of jurisdiction. However, the Austrian ministry of the interior stated that the EGS has no connection with the VS and thus was especially chosen for the job. So, it was prepared in secrecy and then carried out the raid, the EGS were dressed like modern day storm troopers, you know, like US and other police, OK, result:
They seized all records back to 2006 relating to the identiteares, non-commy student orgs, anti-jihad groups and bloggers, etc. Thus the socialists/Anarchists, (that is the Soros, May, Merkel, Sarkozy, Macron etc. gang in Austria) ***lost ALL records in one operation***. And the data is now in the hands of our people.
You can guess, the Austrian ‘Free Press’ isn’t spitting venom, it’s vomiting it. Peter Goldgruber of the FPÖ referred to the press ‘reports’ as fake news. Further, the boss of the Austrian Verfassungsschutz, Peter Gridling, has been suspended by Herbert Kickl, the minister of the interior – and may get arrested. Boy, are the socialists and anarchists up in arms, and outright hysterical.
The rather dubious characters into which the VS offices have deteriorated can be seen on the German VS. During the election in 2017 the VS of Bavaria raided the offices and the home of the AfD candidate Peter Bystron, they even took the DVD player of his children… He sued and won. The court confirmed that it was utterly illegal and UNCONSTITUTIONAL (by the VS!). The main stream media which ran headlines of the VS raid against the “NAZI” – chirp, chirp, not a word.
Thanks for the attention of those who are interested….
Axolotl Grunch says
Thanks DFD. Interesting stuff.
Wellington says
Thanks, DFD, for that info.
Laurence says
“Britain has a steadily lengthening record of admitting jihad preachers without a moment of hesitation.”
And the reason that (now, Little) Britain welcomes jihad preachers is because denying them entry “could cause violence and disrupt community cohesion.”
Sigh. . . the reason the UK uses to keep out the good is the same reason the UK uses to allow in the bad. And all the while, the usual suspects and reprobates who actually are those prone to cause violence and disrupt the UK’s sacred cow of “community cohesion” already live in their midst, and continue to exert their influence through fear and intimidation, threats and violence leveled against an individual or against a larger gathering or group, as well as through the use of flinging around baseless accusations at any and all who do or might oppose them in hope of silencing them.
Britain, once so proud and courageous, but now so humiliated and timid. Why do you continue to behave so guiltily and bring such shame upon yourself. The world sees what you are doing and mourns the loss of that small yet once proud and mighty Island.
We miss you ‘Great’ Britain, if it is at all yet still possible, please, we implore you, do return once again.
Jayell says
‘Community Cohesion’? In the UK? Which ‘communities’, exactly? If this is supposed to mean the UK ‘community’ as a whole, then someone’s been watching too many Walt Disney cartoon features, because the only ‘cohesion’ seems to be either in someone’s fairyland imagination or amongst our Friends of the Great Prophet who seem to be perpetually on their mobile phones in the street as no doubt they collude to take over the joint or commit some outrage. The ragbag of ill-fitting demographic components from some very dubious worlwide suppliers that purports to make up today’s ‘UK community’ would need some pretty drastic engineering to give any semblance it ‘hanging together’ – which, no doubt, explains the ‘law enforcement’ (sic) activities – or curious lack of them – of today’s UK police and immigration officials.
DHazard says
Sometimes I wonder what would happen if you created a Youtube channel that showed only direct quotes from the Quran and Hadith, along with the commentary from famous historical Islamic sources. For instance, just quote the entire chapter out of which Muslims like to cherry pick the part about “if you kill one man it’s like killing the entire world”. Then everyone who saw the video would find that the verse only pertained to Jews, and even then with exceptions. Maybe make it sort of an audio book video with a speaker who had a New York Jewish accent. Behind the script (in both Arabic and English) would be videos contrasting life in Western countries with scenes from places like Bangladesh, Pakistan, Syria, etc. Intentionally leave out videos of bombings, decapitations, etc. Name the channel something like: “The Real Islam” or “The True Muslim” or “A Lamp for Muslims” or “Islam From the Inside”. In other words, confuse people as to whether you’re just a Muslim or an “Islamophobe”.
Islam’s scriptures are so full of hate speech that they are indefensible. That’s why the UK bans certain people from entering. They say things that make Muslims angry because they’re true. Since no policemen or politician in the UK wants to deal with angry Muslims they just ban the people that might fire them up.
Billy Chickens says
Nazi Britain!!
Jayell says
Very apt. What’s happening in the UK now, courtesy of the Muslims, is very much what would have happened if the nazis had invaded in the 1940’s.
Anne Smith says
That is not actually far from the truth, because Hitler prepared very detailed plans for his take over of Britain and the EU is actually implementing them today.
The EU was, in its earliest days run by many ex Nazi civil servants and the whole programme was based on Hitler’s plans for how he would run Europe after he had won the war.
Well he didn’t win the war, but Germany is even now running Europe and plans are in a late stage for a European Army to be formed from contingents from each country, which will naturally be under the control of the most powerful EU member, Germany. Officially it is to be under the control of the EU Commission, but as everyone knows, that really means Germany and at present Frau Merkel, who seems to have succeeded where Hitler failed.
StellaSaidSo says
‘The EU is a continuation of Germany by other means.’ (Peter Hitchens)
Winston says
1.
There are German tanks bearing Turkish flags invading Syria. Perhaps the European Army is already with us.
2.
The British Royals, also from Germany by the way (they changed their names halfway through the First World War when it became obvious Germany was going to lose) would do well to study the case of the Godless Florin.
gravenimage says
Anne, given that the EU only dates from 1993, I rather doubt that it was mostly run by ex Nazi civil servants–even the youngest of them–say, at about twenty at the end of the war–would have been in their late 60s at the EU’s founding.
gravenimage says
Winston, Turkey has purchased tanks from Germany in the past. Is this what you mean?
Moshe says
Mr. Spencer, I believe that you and Ms. Geller can reverse the British ban on your entrance into the UK if only you can say something good about the Muslim community once per day. Is this too much to ask? You each post story after story of negative news–relentlessly negative from death to terror at home and around the world–and yet surely there must be positive news as well.
I am not recommending self-censorship. Please just be even-handed, and the British government may reconsider your status.
For inspiration, you might revisit the landmark speech of former President Obama in Cairo. “As a boy,” he reminisced, “I spent several years in Indonesia and heard the call of the azaan at the break of dawn and the fall of dusk. As a young man, I worked in Chicago communities where many found dignity and peace in their Muslim faith.
“As a student of history, I also know civilization’s debt to Islam,” continued this transformational young leader. Perhaps once a day you can balance tales of terror with inspiring stories of Muslim-Americans advancing the frontiers of science and the arts.
It was not for nothing that President Obama was awarded the prestigious Nobel Peace Prize. You and Ms. Geller might follow in his courageous example. Thank you for your consideration.
gravenimage says
I just fine “Moshe” terribly tedious at this point.
Flavius Claudius Iulianus says
+1
Wellington says
The Nobel Peace Prize is not prestigious except in the eyes of Leftists and terrorists. Remember, Arafat was a recipient. And Obama got it for doing exactly what? It’s not just a nothing prize; it’s a worse than nothing prize. It has farce written all over it.
StellaSaidSo says
You jest, of course, Moshe.
Eur says
I hate Islam but this guy, the creator of pegida, it seems sinister and dangerous. We can not let these people so unpleasant and probably neo-Nazi take ownership of the fight against Islam.
gravenimage says
Eur, I haven’t found anything like this about Lutz Bachmannat this point–excepting general accusations of “neo-Nazism” with nothing to back it up.
If your do have any information that he is actually a Fascist, please let us know.
Eur says
It is easy to find information about this man. Search on the Internet, he has a violent past, drug trafficker, racist …. This man can not lead any movement against Islamization because it reduces the credibility of the cause. This is a very serious matter where we play freedom, this subject that was characterized by his idolized Hitler can not take the flag of the cause for which we fight. Nazism and Islam is the same garbage.
My grandfathers fought against fascism and my grandsons probably will fight against Islam.
gravenimage says
Eur, I very much agree that Fascists are no allies of ours. My mother and aunt were in the British army and stood against Hitler in WWII.
But while I see that Lutz Bachmann was prosecuted for “incitement of racial hatred” for refering to migrants as “scumbags”, I haven’t found much of real substance against him.
As for his being racist, he opened and ran a nightclub in South Africa catering to Blacks. That doesn’t sound all that racist.
I do know he had a background in petty crime–dealling drugs and such–which I do not excuse–but if he has reformed that does not make much difference to me.
I guess I’ll keep poking around.
Fred H says
It’s only a matter of time before the British government loses control of the powerful opposing forces. This is exactly what happened in Palestine in 1948: British forces had to withdraw before being consumed in a full-scale conflagration of the government’s own making. Only problem is, there is nowhere to withdraw to this time.
Lydia Church says
So you guys who warn of the danger are banned, while the jihad terrorists are welcomed as they roll out the red carpet, and invite more terrorism and violence!
Oh sure, that makes perfect sense, in looney land!
Meanwhile…the bannings escalate…
GI is “viewed in the UK as a right wing organization” …. Huh! Gasp!!!! Vaaaht dit I hheeearrrh?!
A RRRRRRIGHT – WINGKKK orgkaniszasstionh?!?!
Whoa, ve can’t haff dattt!!!
Halt!!!
Only lefties are allowed to exist in the Orwellian Order!
Grab them and put them in the gulag, now comrads!
Lydia Church says
“The lamps are going out all over Europe, we shall not see them lit again in our life-time”,
….British Foreign Secretary Sir Edward Grey remarked to a friend on the eve of the United Kingdom’s entry into the First World War.
Charlie says
Banning? Censorship? Using tactics rather than debate always lead to conflict. UK is shutting down the very people who purport to resist and protect its own cultural values by exiling from the land those who assert that Britain is being invaded by a people who hold them in contempt and scorn for their disbelief in Islam. Indeed UK authorities are unwittingly endorsing blasphemy laws by censorship and exile:
Quran 5:33; Sahih International:
Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and strive upon earth [to cause] corruption is none but that they be killed or crucified or that their hands and feet be cut off from opposite sides or that they be exiled from the land. That is for them a disgrace in this world; and for them in the Hereafter is a great punishment,
So far exile is the option used and most are exiled with hands and feet still intact.
Georg says
Here is how to get into the UK without disrupting community cohesion:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BVgIJLGQ3tY
gravenimage says
Disgusting.
MoInTheKnow says
Let Prime Minister Theresa May from now on forever be known and called Sharia May.
She deserves nothing less!
StellaSaidSo says
I can think of other names for PM May, but they’re a lot less polite!
MoInTheKnow says
Yes Stella, I also have other words to describe Sharia May. I was just being polite!
J D S says
I just can’t understand the peoples, in all of Europe,not just the UK…..This Islam take over has been ongoing for some time now and elections have also been ongoing but I haven’t seen a change in the government’s operation pertaining to Islam and it’s adherents….So that makes me think that it’s the citizens fault or they don’t vote at all or no one runs that has a different perspective or Muslim voters outnumber the Brits or elections are rigged…..I have put forth several scenarios ….Any suggestions out there in JW land. I’m also going out on a limb and saying the U.S, Canada and Australia and Mexico as well, are ripe for the picking also..Any thoughts there???
gravenimage says
J D S, many in the West are still in denial over the threat of Islam.