This kind of “grooming” is likely far more common in Muslim households in Britain than Mrs Justice Parker (and Theresa May) realizes or would like to admit. But British authorities can’t take all the children into foster care, or even most or many of them, can they?
“‘RELIGIOUS WARRIORS’ Two Muslim boys removed from father’s care after High Court rules they were being groomed to be ‘religious warriors,’” by Neal Baker, The Sun, March 8, 2018 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):
TWO Muslim brothers have been taken into care after their father groomed them as “religious warriors”.
Social workers found the boys, aged between 11 and the mid-teens, lived in a “radicalised Islamic household”.
They were “at potential risk of dangerous activities” because of the parenting of their father born in Uganda, the High Court heard.
Photographs seen by the Family Division judge Mrs Justice Parker showed the boys in Islamic “fighter” poses” wielding swords.
The family, including a girl in her mid-teens, were stopped at a ferry port in Harwich, Essex three years ago amid police fears they were bound for ISIS-held Syria….
mortimer says
HAS ONE BRITISH JUDGE ACTUALLY DONE THE READING LIST? Dare we think that judge Parker has actually READ and STUDIED the Koran, Sahih Bukhari, the Sira and canonical commentaries? Has Justice Parker heard of Said Qutb or Maulana Maududi or Muhammad Faraj… all critically important JIHAD THEORISTS STUDIED BY THE JIHADISTS.
Does SCOTLAND YARD HAVE A SINGLE AGENT who has READ THOSE DOCUMENTS?
Does ANY UK police department have an investigator with a THOROUGH UNDERSTANDING OF THE JIHAD DOCTRINE?
Are there any PROSECTORS in England who has FORMALLY or INFORMALLY STUDIED the JIHAD doctrine, the MISOGYNY doctrine, the KAFIR doctrine, the TAQIYYA doctrine, the NEAR ENEMY doctrine, the AL WALAA WAL BARAA doctrine.
Are all of UK’s law enforcement personnel INADEQUATE and UNPREPARED TO DO THEIR JOBS?
UK voters SHOULD DEMAND that SUPREMACIST Islamic doctrines be taught to ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL, PROSECUTORS and JUDGES. THEY MUST BE EDUCATED in these matters, or else, they will not be CAPABLE of doing their job of PUTTING THE JIHADISTS OUT OF BUSINESS.
Ecosse1314 says
Totally agree…but thiz goes for every country in the world. Remember Mr Spencer used to lecture your FBI recruits but was told his presence was no longer required.
elee says
I applaud. Read up and wake up.
strong aingel says
Its not difficult to spot these people. We need to remove them and their spawn from the UK. There is no reason why they should have been let in, and likewise none to keep them. The future of our children and theirs requires robust action now. Destroy Islam, eradicate its followers. That is the only safety net available in space and time ..
Lebel says
Did you not get the memo? jihadwatch is only against Islam and nobody is calling for genocide against Muslims.
/sarc
LeftisruiningCanada says
Maybe he meant that they should be eradicated via “DEPROGRAMMING” them right out of islam?
CogitoErgoSum says
Or … they could be taken out of Islam by conversion to another religion. But if that were done, then it would be the Muslims who did not convert who would be obliged to do the “eradicating,” now wouldn’t it?
Anne Smith says
A great pity these people were stopped at Harwich. They should have been waved on their way – with the whole family.
The fewer of them in Britain the better.
Now we, the poor suffering honest British tax payers, have got to pay for their upkeep for how many years?
One absolutely despairs of our rulers.
Emilie Green says
A common Muzzie practice is whispering into the ear of a newly-birthed child the shahada.
The child is cursed from that moment on. It’s all down hill from there.
Raja says
By calling for the slaughter of non-Muslims Islam is in a state of war just like the Palestinians who are at war with Israel, officially. There is a lot of lies and deceit in Islam and its think tank to make this war functional perpetually.
elee says
Child victims perpetrate crimes against the next generation of children. This is the cycle of victimization and abuse discovered in studies of pedophiles. The model applies to Muslims too. Kudos to this Judge.
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
I hope they Will not put these Kids under the care of mithraist churchmen for them to have anus and vaginal sex with them.
LeftisruiningCanada says
try and behave yourself Ibrahim.
CRUSADER says
OH! BEHAVE, Baby!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1lJFlB-89Q
CRUSADER says
Mr Irritates’ attempt at using Latin words is improving.
He will become a true blue Roman, yet! Keep it up!
SALVE !
CRUSADER says
What says Stella?
Is there caution on this to learn from?
dreggsofhumanity says
I’m just wondering how many of us non muslims the leftist liberals would like to be found dead and do they really think they’re exempt.
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
Lifruinicanada, are you in doubt that if these Kids are put under the care of mithraist churchmen they Will not have anus and vaginal sex with them ? mithraist Christian clergies cannot be trusted.
kuriakose says
You liar. Such practices are not taught or condoned in Christianity. What individuals do contrary to Church teachings cannot and should not be ascribed to Christianity. Whereas, in your vile religion such practices are taught and being practised. Eg look at this hadith:
Sahih Muslim – Book of Menstruation – hadith #525 – Commentary
Our companions have said that if the penile head has penetrated a woman’s anus, or a man’s anus, or an animal’s vagina or its anus then it is necessary to wash whether the one being penetrated is alive or dead, young or old, whether it was done intentionally or absentmindedly, whether it was done willfully or forcefully. This also applies if the woman places the male member inside her while the man is asleep, whether the penis is erect or not, whether the penis is circumcised or uncircumcised. All these situations require that the person committing the act and the one the act is committed on must wash themselves, unless the person committing the act or the person the act is committed on is a young male or female. In that case it cannot be said that the person must wash, for they do not have the responsibility, rather it is said that this person is in a state of impurity. If that person can discern (the sexual act) then his guardian can command him to wash just as he commands him to perform the ablution washing for prayers. For if he prays without washing, his prayer has not been performed correctly; likewise if he doesn’t wash after he reaches puberty he must be forced to wash. If he washed as a youth and then reaches puberty, then he does not have to repeat the washing. Our companions have said that intercourse occurs when a healthy male’s penile head completely penetrates (an orifice), as has been unanimously agreed. Thus, when the penile head has completely disappeared (inside the orifice), then all the regulations concerning washing apply. It is unanimously agreed that it is not necessary that the entire penile shaft penetrate to apply the regulations of washing. If part of the penile head penetrates, then the regulations of washing are not imposed as is agreed, except by an odd few of our companions who said that even in this case all the regulations of washing apply. However, this opinion is wrong, rejected and abandoned. If the male member was severed and what remained was less than the length of the penile head, then none of the washing regulations apply. If the part remaining was equal in length to the penile head length then that part must completely penetrate for the regulation of washing to apply. If the part remaining was greater in length to the penile head length then there are two famous opinions for our companions. The most correct is that if the portion that penetrates is equal to the length of the penile head, then the regulations for washing apply. The other opinion is that none of the regulations for washing apply until the entire remaining length of the penile shaft completely penetrates and Allah knows best. If a man wraps a sheath around his male member and then ejaculates inside a woman’s vagina, then there are three opinions from our companions. The most famous is that the man must wash. The second is that he does not have to wash because he ejaculated inside the sheath. The third is that if the sheath is thick and prevents climax and wetness (in the vagina) then washing is not necessary, otherwise it is necessary and Allah knows best. If a woman inserts (in her vagina) an animal’s penis she must wash, and if she inserts a detached penis (thakaran maktu-an, lit. “a severed male member”) there are two opinions; the most correct is that she must wash.
You vile muhamaddan, any hole, including animal’s, dead or alive, will do satiate your lust. That’s the fruits of your religion.
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
Ignorant fool kuriakose, It is only talking about what Will make ritual bath compulsory, whether the sex is permissible or not permissible. Anus sex and sex with animals are not permissible and carry death penalty. one Who did it, but not caught has to take rituel bath and seek forgiveness from Allah
kuriakose says
Liar thou art, vile muhameddan! It says exactly what it says. What about your prophet marrying a 6 year old and practising thighing on her until he could consummate the marriage? Pretty vile and sanctioned in your religion, eh? Your prophet is a vile person who could not control his sex drive. Your allaah is nothing but a pimp for the giant brothel in jannah for the muhamaddens.
Wellington says
What Muslim adult male can be trusted, Ibrahim? I’d say where sex is concerned, freedom too, a true Golden Rule for all, overall graciousness, average IQ level, et al., best, in the courts of public opinion and common sense, to presume EVERY Muslim guilty until proven innocent. Actually, you could serve as a “role model” to prove my point here. You’d be sterling in this role. Absolutely superb.
LeftisruiningCanada says
The point which again you are doing your absolute best to avoid, is that Christian clergy do not have as their most perfect example of conduct a man who married a 6 year old, rubbed his winky all over her until she was 9 then, at that ripe old age of womanhood, started having filthy old man sex with her.
If a Christian clargyman does something like that to a child, it is ALWAYS BAD.
ESPECIALLY if he ‘marries’ her.
ALWAYS.
From now on, i am going to take your filthy language and accusations as mere projection on your part, since there can be no doubt that you know what mohammad did, and don’t feel the least bit bad about it.
I AM THE INFIDEL YOUR IMAM WARNED YOU ABOUT says
Here we go again……. Ibrahim itace muhammed once again drops out of Mo’s anus full of shit
LeftisruiningCanada says
It is unfortunate that the term ‘grooming’ is applied to these two boy being taught islam, and also to the groups of filthy vermin who likely pimped hundreds of thousands of young girls between themselves for rape and torture sessions.
Doesn’t seem quite right.